The relationship between estrogen receptors in primary and secondary breast carcinomas and in sequential primary breast carcinomas

Comparison of Predictive Immunohistochemical Marker Expression of Primary Breast Cancer and Paired Distant Metastasis using Surgical Material: A Practice-Based Study

Parallel studies of primary breast carcinomas and corresponding distant metastases samples reveal considerable differences. Our aim was to highlight this issue from another perspective and provide further data based on 98 patient samples: 69 primary breast carcinoma and 85 distant metastases from bone, central nervous system (CNS) and lung (56 paired). Two independent series of immunohistochemical reactions with different antibodies for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2), along with HER2 fluroscence in situ hybridization (FISH) were performed on tissue microarrays to classify breast carcinoma and distant metastases samples into Luminal A, Luminal B-proliferating, Luminal B-HER2+, HER2+ and triple negative (TNBC) surrogate breast cancer groups. Correlation and agreement between the two assessments of ER and PgR were fair-to-moderate, and almost perfect for HER2 and Ki67. There was 40% discordance concerning immunophenotype between breast carcinomas and distant metastases. Most common metastatic site of ER+ breast carcinoma was the skeletal system (59.2%), whereas that of TNBCs was the CNS (58.8%) and lungs (23.5%). Distant metastases in bones were mostly luminal (54.3%), in the CNS, Luminal B (53.2%), and in the lung, TNBC (37.5%). The change of drugable properties of primary breast cancers in the respective bone and CNS metastases suggests that characterization of the metastasis is necessary for appropriate treatment planning.

The prognosis of synchronous and metachronous bilateral breast cancer in Chinese patients

This study was undertaken to determine the differences in the clinicopathology and survival between synchronous bilateral breast cancer (sBBC) and metachronous bilateral breast cancer (mBBC). Additionally, we analyzed the risk factors for single tumors to develop as sBBC or mBBC. Of the 190 bilateral breast cancer (BBC) cases, 84 cases were sBBC and 106 were mBBC. We defined sBBC as two tumors that developed within 12 months, while mBBC was defined as two tumors that developed over more than 12 months. The peak age of onset of the first mBBC tumors was significantly younger than that of sBBC tumors (p = 0.001). There was a higher concordance rate of ER/ER positivity and PR/PR positivity in the first and second tumors of sBBC than mBBC. The two sBBC breast cancers had relatively similar hormone conditions because of the low rate of ER and PR transformation from positive to negative or vice versa. We determined that patients who presented with extracapsular extension (p = 0.008) and ER positivity (p = 0.001) tend to have synchronous cancers, while patients with 3+ HER2 were more likely to develop metachronous tumors. The prognosis for mBBC was better than that for sBBC when the survival time of mBBC was measured from the initial observation of the first tumors.

Variability in hormone and growth factor receptor expression in primary versus recurrent, metastatic, and post-neoadjuvant breast carcinoma

The introduction of selective molecular targeted therapy, specifically tamoxifen and trastuzumab, has significantly altered the clinical behavior of breast carcinoma. Several questions remain, however, regarding potential phenotypic drifts in estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and epidermal growth factor receptor (Her-2/neu) expression between the primary and metastatic site. Whether patients should be tested for ER, PR, and Her-2/neu expression in the nodal or distant metastatic site, local recurrence and following neoadjuvant therapy, and whether this has an effect on prognosis remains elusive. A review of 45 studies addressing ER, PR, and Her-2/neu expression in lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, local recurrence, and post-neoadjuvant therapy revealed the following average phenotypic drift in ER, PR, and Her-2/neu expression, respectively: 13.1 % (median = 10.0 %), 13.8 % (median = 16.0 %), and 7.7 % (median = 5.0 %) for lymph node metastasis; 21.8 % (median = 19.5 %), 30.8 % (median = 33.5 %), and 7.6 % (median = 6.1 %) for distant metastasis; 19.8 % (median = 13.4 %), 27.1 % (median = 28.6 %), and 6.6 % (median = 1.6 %) for local recurrence; and 12.9 % (median = 8.0 %), 32.0 % (median = 20.0 %), and 8.9 % (median = 0 %) post-neoadjuvant therapy. The above findings support the notion of re-evaluating ER, PR, and Her-2/neu expression in distant metastasis, lymph node metastasis and to a lesser extent local recurrence. The effects of neoadjuvant therapy on receptor expression are more pronounced for PR, which may have a prognostic role in therapy efficacy.

Prognostic implications of estrogen receptor pattern of both tumors in contralateral breast cancer

Estrogen receptor (ER) status is important for breast cancer survival, it is however unclear how prognosis of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) is affected by ER-status of the two tumors. We conducted a large, population-based study of ER-status of both tumors in CBC patients and its influence on prognosis. The cohort consisted of all women diagnosed with CBC in Stockholm, Sweden during 1976-2005, with information on ER-status from medical records (N = 933). Prognosis was modeled as incidence rates of distant metastasis via Poisson regression. The proportion of CBCs with both cancers of the same ER-status was significantly larger than expected by chance. For synchronous (simultaneous) cancers the prognosis was significantly affected by the combined ER-status of both tumors (p = 0.01). Compared to unilateral breast cancer patients the incidence rate ratio (IRR) for patients with double ER-positive tumors was 1.25 (95 % CI: 0.88-1.76), for ER-discordant tumors 2.19 (95 % CI: 1.18-4.08) and for double ER-negative tumors 3.95 (95 % CI: 1.77-8.81). For metachronous (non-simultaneous) cancers, women with double ER-positive tumors had similarly bad prognosis (IRR = 2.95; 95 % CI: 2.39-3.64) as women with double ER-negative tumors (IRR = 2.88; 95 % CI: 1.83-4.52). Both shorter time span between first and second cancer and endocrine therapy for the first cancer further worsened prognosis of women with double ER-positive metachronous CBC. For synchronous CBC patients, ER-pattern of both tumors is an important prognosticator, while among metachronous CBC patients, double ER-positive tumors confer equally bad prognosis as double ER-negative cancers. Our results indicate that this might be due to endocrine therapy resistance.

[Hormone receptors and HER-2 changes during breast cancer progression: clinical implications]

Breast cancer remains a major public health problem. Even if there is an increase in this cancer curability, metastatic breast cancer remains a lethal disease in the vast majority of cases. Therapeutic advances in the chemotherapeutic and targeted therapies fields induced an increase in survival, however the proportion of long survivors remains low. Phenotypic instability, an early process initiated during tumour progression, and continued on the metastatic stage of the disease, can be one of the putative hypotheses explaining these results. An increasing amount of scientific data are pledging for a reanalysis of the phenotypic profile regarding hormone receptors and HER-2 status of metastatic lesions in order to identify drugable targets and allow individualisation of the treatment of these metastatic breast cancer patients. Phenotypic changes between the primary tumour and the paired metastatic lymph nodes are a challenging pitfall, raising the question of which site has to be assessed in the adjuvant treatment decision process. This article presents a comprehensive analysis of the frequency of theses phenotypic changes altogether with new modalities to evaluate this phenotypic status.

A strategy for distinguishing optimal cancer subtypes

Much attention is directed currently to identifying subtypes of cancers that are genetically and clinically distinct. The expectation is that subtyping on the basis of somatic genomic characteristics will supplant traditional pathological subtypes with respect to relevance for targeted therapies and clinical course. Less attention has been paid to the goal of validating subtypes on the basis of the distinctiveness of their etiologies. In this article it is shown that studies of individuals with double primary malignancies provide uniquely valuable information for establishing the etiologic distinctiveness of candidate tumor subtypes. Studies of double primaries have the potential to definitively rank candidate taxonomic systems with respect to their etiological relevance by determining which subtypes are most highly correlated in the double primaries. The concept is illustrated with data from studies of the concordance of estrogen and progestin status in bilateral breast cancers, where it is shown that double primaries are much more likely to be concordant with respect to estrogen receptor (ER) status than for PR status. The high concordance of ER status is consistent with a growing literature demonstrating the etiologic distinctiveness of ER+ and ER- tumors.

Concordance in histological and biological parameters between first and second primary breast cancers

BACKGROUND

Women with breast cancer are more likely to have a second breast cancer than women in the general population are to have a primary cancer. However, the biological relationship between primary and second breast cancers is not clear.

METHODS

A total of 30,617 patients diagnosed with bilateral breast cancers between 1990 and 2007 were identified through 17 cancer registries of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Logistic regression with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was used to model strength of association in hormone receptor status, grade, and histology between 2 cancers.

RESULTS

There was a strong association in estrogen receptor status between 2 bilateral tumors (OR, 7.64; 95% CI, 7.00-8.35). The strength of association in estrogen receptor status depended on the time interval between the first and second tumors and age at diagnosis. The OR was 25.9 for synchronous tumors (within 1 month) and 3.69 for metachronous tumors separated by ≥10 years. The strength of association was stronger in patients whose first cancer was diagnosed before age 50 (OR, 11.7) versus after age 50 (OR, 5.71). A similar pattern was observed for progesterone receptor, grade, and histological type, but with relatively weaker association.

CONCLUSIONS

The strong concordance in hormone receptor status of primary and second breast cancers suggests that 2 breast cancers arise in a common milieu and that tumor subtypes are predetermined in the early stage of breast carcinogenesis.

Impact of metastatic estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status on survival

Hormone responsive breast cancer is usually determined by the presence of estrogen receptors (ER) or progesterone receptors (PR) on primary invasive breast cancers. Adjuvant and metastatic hormone therapy are recommended based on primary ER and PR determination. Little information is available to determine if primary hormone receptors correlate with metastatic disease and if survival is influenced by metastatic receptor status. We retrospectively compared primary to metastatic tumor ER and PR content from 200 metastatic breast cancer patients. ER and PR analyses were available in both primary and metastatic disease in 200 and 173 patients, respectively. There was a correlation between both the ER and PR in the primary and metastatic lesion (p < 0.001). However, in 60 of 200 (30%) patients, discordance between primary and metastatic ER was noted. Tumors from 68 of 173 (39.3%) showed discordance for PR. In 39 (19.5%) patients, the ER primary status was positive and metastatic status was negative and in 21 (10.5%) patients, the primary status was negative and metastatic status was positive. Survival from the time of metastatic diagnosis was calculated. Those patients with ER positive primary and metastatic tumors (Positive/Positive) or only the metastatic lesion (Negative/Positive) had similar median survival (1131 and 1111 days, respectively). However, patients with tumors that changed from positive primary to negative metastasis (Positive/Negative) experienced significantly shorter median survival (669 days, p < 0.05). Likewise, median survival (580 days) was significantly shorter for patients with primary and metastasis ER negative (Negative/Negative, p < 0.001) compared to Positive/Positive (p < 0.001) or compared to Negative/Positive (p < 0.02). The changes in PR status were not associated with a change in survival. We found a significant discordance between hormone receptor content of primary versus metastatic breast cancer. The ER status of the metastatic lesion was a better predictor of survival. Therefore, optimal metastatic treatment cannot be determined solely on primary ER and PR analysis.

A patient with occult breast cancer presenting with an axillary lymph node metastasis and a synchronous contralateral breast cancer

Detection of a breast mass accompanied by a contralateral axillary lymphadenopathy presents a dilemma because of the possible presence of an occult breast cancer on the same side as the axillary lymphadenopathy. A patient presented with an axillary lymphadenopathy from an occult breast cancer and a synchronous contralateral breast cancer, for which the differential diagnosis was established through a significant difference in estrogen and progesterone receptor levels. The patient was treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by bilateral modified radical mastectomy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and adjuvant radiation therapy. She is alive and free of disease 1.5 years after the diagnosis.

Phenotypic similarities in bilateral breast cancer

Bilateral breast cancers that develop at similar times in an individual are likely to have been subjected to similar hormonal, environmental and genetic influences during tumourogenesis compared with metachronous tumours. As such, it is possible that tumour phenotype in synchronous bilateral breast cancer may display similar biological characteristics. The aim of this study was to identify phenotypic similarities between synchronous and metachronous bilateral breast cancers which may suggest a common origin. Thirty-three cases of synchronous and 46 cases of metachronous bilateral breast cancer that displayed similar tumour type were analysed for concordance in relation to various histological and immunohistochemical parameters. A higher level of concordance was demonstrated for synchronous cases with the highest level seen for oestrogen receptor. It is likely that this is related to similar tumourogenic pathways occurring at equivalent exposure times to various environmental and hormonal influences, although, in a proportion of cases, inherited genetic factors may play a role.

Estrogen receptor status of primary breast cancer is predictive of estrogen receptor status of contralateral breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Tamoxifen reduces the risk for contralateral breast cancer by approximately 30%-50%, with benefits probably limited to women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive primary disease. In a retrospective analysis of data from National Surgical and Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project trials B-18, B-22, and B-25, we determined whether the ER status of primary breast cancer predicts the ER status of a subsequent contralateral breast cancer and whether tamoxifen treatment affects this relationship. In these trials, tamoxifen at 20 mg/day had been administered only to women aged 50 years or older, rather than to those determined by the ER status of their primary tumor, allowing an assessment of the treatment's effects in ER-negative disease.

METHODS

Among the 5513 eligible patients, 176 patients developed a contralateral breast cancer. The ER status of the primary and contralateral tumor was determined and cross-classified for women who did not receive tamoxifen (i.e., those aged 49 years or younger) and for women who did (i.e., those aged 50 years or older). ER data were available for 110 evaluable invasive contralateral breast cancers.

RESULTS

Among patients who did not receive tamoxifen (n = 62), 89% with an ER-positive primary cancer had an ER-positive contralateral breast cancer and 70% with an ER-negative primary breast cancer had an ER-negative contralateral breast cancer (odds ratio for the association between primary and contralateral ER status = 14.8, 95% confidence interval = 3.8 to 74.3; P<.001). Among patients who received tamoxifen (n = 48), 56% with an ER-positive primary cancer had an ER-positive contralateral breast cancer and 78% with an ER-negative primary cancer had an ER-negative contralateral breast cancer (odds ratio = 3.4, 95% confidence interval = 0.53 to 39.2; P =.25).

CONCLUSION

The ER status of the primary breast cancer was associated with that of the contralateral breast for patients not receiving tamoxifen. Patients with an ER-positive primary cancer who received tamoxifen had a lower concordance rate with fewer ER-positive contralateral breast cancers, which may be a result of tamoxifen treatment.

Absence of progesterone receptor associated with secondary breast cancer in postmenopausal women

The relationship between expression of receptors for oestrogen and progesterone (ER and PR) and disease progression in breast cancer was investigated by comparing immunocytochemical determinations of ER and PR in fine needle aspirates from primary and secondary breast tumours. Rates of receptor expression were significantly higher in primary than in secondary lesions: for ER 63.3% (n = 689) compared with 45.3% (n = 223), and for PR 53.7% (n = 443) compared with 33.1% (n = 121). The effect of menopausal status was examined by subdividing the patient cohort into those over or under the age of 50 years. In both instances, ER expression in secondary tumours was relatively low; however, only postmenopausal patients had significantly lower rates of PR expression in secondary tumours. Consistent with this, an increase in the ER+PR- profile in secondary tumours compared with primary cases from postmenopausal patients was seen, and in a multivariate analysis, a specific absence of PR expression in secondary tumours was revealed. Comparison of ER and PR expression in simultaneously sampled primary tumours and lymph node metastases from the same patient showed that receptor expression was stable with progression to a metastatic site as results were concordant for ER in 92% (n = 88) and PR in 93.8% of cases (n = 65). These results suggest that absence of PR expression in primary breast cancer is associated with disease progression and may be a marker of an aggressive tumour phenotype.

Oestrogen receptor-alpha variant mRNA expression in primary human breast tumours and matched lymph node metastases

We have shown previously that the relative expression of a truncated oestrogen receptor-alpha variant mRNA (ER clone 4) is significantly increased in axillary node-positive primary breast tumours compared with node-negative tumours. In this study, we have examined the relative expression of clone 4-truncated, exon 5-deleted and exon 7-deleted oestrogen receptor-alpha variant mRNAs in 15 primary breast tumour samples and in synchronous axillary lymph node metastases. Overall, there were no significant differences between the primary tumours and the matched metastases in the relative expression of these three specific variant mRNAs. Furthermore, the pattern of all deleted oestrogen receptor-alpha variant mRNAs appeared conserved between any primary and its matched secondary tumour.

Estrogen receptor status of breast cancer: a marker of different stages of tumor or different entities of the disease?

Breast cancer can be divided into two types according to the estrogen receptor (ER) level of the tumor: ER-positive and ER-negative. Two hypotheses have been raised about the relationship between ER-positive and ER-negative breast tumors. One hypothesis considers ER status as an indicator of a different stage of the disease. The other regards ER-positive and ER-negative tumors as different entities. For both etiological and biological studies of breast cancer it is important to know which hypothesis is correct. In this paper, we review evidence for and against each hypothesis and suggest issues to be addressed in future studies.

Oestrogen receptor: a stable phenotype in breast cancer

Oestrogen receptor (ER) expression in breast cancer is regarded as a phenotype that may change during the natural history of the disease or during endocrine therapy. It has been suggested that in up to 70% of tumours that show acquired resistance the mechanism may be changed in ER status from positive to negative. This paper proposes an alternative hypothesis that ER expression in a stable phenotype in breast cancer. The paper reviews the literature on ER expression during the natural history of breast cancer in patients and also presents data on the effect of endocrine therapy on ER expression. If the alternative hypothesis is true it has important implications for treatment from chemoprevention to acquired endocrine resistance in advanced disease. Equally, if the hypothesis is true, attempts to develop laboratory models of endocrine resistance where ER-positive tumours become ER negative need to be re-evaluated.

Estrogen and progesterone receptor content in bilateral breast cancer

Estrogen and progesterone receptor content was determined in 34 patients with synchronous and 23 patients with asynchronous bilateral breast cancer. Steroid receptor content was measured quantitatively by DCC method. It was shown that progesterone receptor content could not be predicted, as well as, that steroid receptor content of the second tumor significantly influenced the development of asynchronous bilateral breast cancer. The high discordance rate concerning histologic type between two tumors within synchronous as well as asynchronous biopsies was observed. The obtained results indicate that both synchronous and asynchronous bilateral breast tumors may be considered as biologically different tumors whose both steroid receptor levels should be determined whenever possible.

Immunohistochemical study of estrogen receptors in primary breast carcinomas and their lymph node metastases including comparison of two monoclonal antibodies

Estrogen receptors (ER) status was investigated in 101 primary breast carcinomas and their axillary lymph node metastases to determine if the malignant cells retained or changed this phenotypic feature during the metastatic process. Immunohistochemistry with the ER-ICA kit (Abbott Laboratory) on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue was used (paraffin ER-ICA). The ER status in primary and secondary tumours was concordant in 80 patients (79%) and discordant in 21 (21%). Eighteen of these twenty-one patients had ER-positive primary tumours and ER-negative lymph node metastases. This discordance, which may be due to loss of ERs in the metastatic cells or tumour heterogeneity, could explain the well-known failure of endocrine treatment in some of the patients with ER-positive primary tumours. A new monoclonal antibody ID5 (DAKO) against ERs was applied on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue from 83 of these 101 primary carcinomas. These analyses and paraffin ER-ICA analyses were compared to prior analyses of the same 83 tumours using the ER-ICA kit on fresh frozen tissue ("gold standard", frozen ER-ICA). Kappa coefficient, sensitivity and specificity were 0.74, 0.96 and 0.75 for ID5 antibody, and 0.59, 0.72 and 0.96 for ER-ICA antibody on paraffin sections.

Estrogen and progesterone receptor concordance between primary and recurrent breast cancer

Estrogen and progesterone receptor status in breast cancer can determine therapeutic options and may provide prognostic information. The purpose of this study is to compare the concordance of the primary breast cancer steroid hormone receptor status to that of the recurrent breast cancer and to determine whether the type of second lesion (local recurrence, second primary, or metastatic lesion) and adjuvant therapy received changed the receptor concordance. The records of eighty-three patients with estrogen receptor (ER) analysis available for primary (p) and recurrent (r) breast cancer for 1976-1990 were reviewed. In addition, 32 of these patients also had available progesterone receptor (PR) values for primary and recurrent breast cancers. Statistical evaluation was performed by chi-square, Student's t-test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. ER concordance (primary/recurrent, p/r) was identified in 59/83 (71%) patients; PR concordance was identified in 18/32 (56%) patients. Whether the second lesion was a local recurrence, second primary, or a metastatic lesion did not affect ER concordance or PR concordance. Adjuvant chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, or radiation therapy, either alone or in combination, did not affect ER or PR concordance. The disease-free survival (DFS) for patients with ER (p+)/(r-) (primary receptor positive/recurrent receptor negative) was significantly shorter than those with ER (p-)/(r+)(27.6 +/- 7.4 months versus 50.6 +/- 7.6 mo, P = 0.04). The DFS for PR (p+)/(r-) patients was 28.8 +/- 7.9 months compared to the DFS of 46.8 +/- 11.8 months for PR (p-)/(r+) patients (P = NS). A significantly shorter DFS for ER (p+)/(r-) patients compared to ER (p-)/(r+) patients and a trend towards a shorter DFS for PR (p+)/(r-) patients compared to PR (p-)/(r+) patients may reflect a loss of hormonal regulation or an increase in cancer aggressiveness.

Intraoperative cytology in breast cancer diagnosis: comparison between cytologic and frozen section techniques

The diagnostic accuracy of frozen section (FS) examination and intraoperative cytology (IOC) has been compared in two different series of breast biopsies in which only one of the two methods has been used. The intraoperative results have been compared with the final histological diagnoses. Five-hundred-ten cases have been investigated by using FS only, and 407 by means of IOC. The two series were comparable because they included the same pathologies; moreover we have subdivided each series into four groups of pathologies to better evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of two methods. The total diagnostic accuracy of FS has been 93.13% vs. 95.33% of IOC. The value of diagnostic accuracy of FS and IOC in the four sub-groups substantially overlapped; there was only a little difference in the group of "various lesions" in which the diagnostic accuracy of IOC was higher. No false positive has been observed in IOC. FS have produced one false positive (0.19%), whereas false negatives have amounted to 1.77% for IOC and to 1.72% for FS. Deferred diagnoses have been 2.95% in IOC and 4.90% in FS examination. For both methods according to Galen and Gambino the following values have been calculated: sensitivity, specificity, efficiency, and predictive value. By comparing the data, the value of the cytological examination in the intraoperative diagnoses results is evident mainly when the latter is coupled with the gross observation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Sequential estrogen receptor determinations from primary breast cancer and at relapse: prognostic and therapeutic relevance. The International Breast Cancer Study Group (formerly Ludwig Group)

We retrospectively evaluated 401 selected patients who had estrogen receptor (ER) assays both at primary surgery and at relapse in an accessible site to determine the clinical relevance of the subsequent ER determination. The median time between ER assessments was 27 months (range: 2-122 months). The median follow-up time from diagnosis was 6 years (range: 2-12 years). For patients with ER+ tumors at primary diagnosis, 29% (76/261) had ER- tumors at relapse, while for ER- primaries, the conversion rate was 33% (46/140). Conversions from ER+ to ER- occurred more often when the time interval between assays was less than one year (p = 0.004), while conversions from ER- to ER+ tended to occur late (beyond three years; p = 0.0003). Treatments received between assays (usually adjuvant therapy) had only a slight influence on ER status conversion. Post-relapse survival was poor for patients who had the biopsy accessible recurrence within one year; an expression of the aggressive nature of the disease. Among patients whose accessible relapse was beyond one year, those with ER- primaries who converted to ER+ had a longer survival than those whose recurrence was classified again as ER- (p = 0.006). This group of patients with ER- primaries who recurred beyond one year with an ER+ tumor in an accessible site represented 29% (40/140) of all patients with ER- primaries and had an estimated overall survival rate of more than 60% at 6 years from the accessible relapse. ER determination upon relapse within one year has very little clinical relevance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Determination of estrogen receptors in paraffin-embedded tissue. Techniques and the value in breast cancer treatment

Estrogen receptor (ER) analysis in breast cancer has been used in three clinical situations: to select patients with advanced breast cancer for hormonal therapy, as a prognostic parameter, and for selection of women with early breast cancer to adjuvant hormonal treatment. ER has traditionally been measured using labelled hormone in binding assays--often in dextran-coated charcoal assays (DCC). Monoclonal antibodies to ER has permitted development of a solid phase enzyme immunoassay (ER-EIA) used for quantitative determination of ER in tissue homogenates, and have also been used for determination of ER using an immunohistochemical assay in frozen sections (ER-ICA) or in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue (ER-PAR). A large number of studies has compared ER-EIA with ER-DCC assays. There is a good linear correlation between the two types of assay but ER-EIA measure more ER and classify a larger fraction of tumors ER-positive than conventional ER assays. Lack of clinical data makes the significance of this uncertain. Numerous studies have reported on the correlation between ER-ICA and ER-DCC or ER-EIA. There is a good correlation among the assays on classification of ER status with a median 86% concordance, but a somewhat poorer correlation between semiquantified ER of immunohistochemical assays and ER determined by the quantitative methods (median coefficient of correlation 0.67). There is a large variation in the cut-off level for definition of ER-positive in immunohistochemical assays emphasizing the need for quality control studies. The major problem involved in ER analysis in paraffin-embedded tissue is a considerable loss of immunoreactivity compared to sections from frozen tissue. This can partly be overcome by modifications of the immunohistochemical technique using enzyme pretreatment and other amplification systems, but the sensitivity of ER-PAR remains lower than ER-ICA despite these modifications, and the ER status is less reliably determined in tumors with low ER contents (< 100 fmol). The prognostic value of ER-PAR was evaluated with a multivariate analysis. The endpoint was disease-free interval in systemically untreated patients with early breast cancer, and the variables used were: ER-DCC, ER-PAR, age, tumor size, tumor grade, and nodal status. A total of 133 patients from the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group's (DBCG) 77c protocols had a complete set of variables. The analysis showed that only nodal status, ER-DCC, and tumor grade were significant and independent prognostic variables. An overview of larger multivariate studies on mainly node-negative patients failed to show independent prognostic significance of ER-DCC.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Variations in the content of steroid receptors in breast cancer. Comparison between primary tumors and metastatic lesions

Steroid receptors were determined by the dextran-coated charcoal method in 193 breast cancer patients in different clinical stages of disease. Quantitative estrogen and progesterone values in primary tumors (n = 69) were compared with receptors in regional lymph node metastases (n = 28) and in distant malignant deposits (n = 65). The groups including receptor values from primaries and regional lymph node metastases (n = 15) and from primaries and distant metastatic lesions (n = 16) in the same patients were also analyzed. The obtained results indicated relative stability of both receptors in loco-regional disease, but with a tendency towards lower receptor values in lesions from advanced disease. This tendency is probably caused by the disease progression itself, but the influence of radio- or chemotherapy cannot be excluded.

Biological characterisation of primary and metachronous lesions in breast cancer patients

Proliferative activity, evaluated as [3H]thymidine labelling index ([3H]dT LI), and hormone receptors were determined on 97 primary breast cancers and on metachronous lesions from the same patient. Overall, the [3H]dT LI of metachronous lesions was significantly higher than that of the primary tumour (P = 0.003). Hormone receptor profiles of the two lesions were similar in about 75% of the cases; disagreements were mainly due to a disappearance of hormone receptors in metachronous lesions. In contralateral tumours, [3H]dT LI and hormone receptors were unrelated to those of the relative primary lesion. In this series of relapsing patients, [3H]dT LI was unrelated to hormone receptor status in the primary tumour, but it was higher in the metachronous lesions from patients with hormone receptor-negative primary tumours. For patients given no systemic therapy between surgery and relapse, the time to develop local-regional recurrences or contralateral tumours was inversely related to the [3H]dT LI of the metachronous lesions.

Bilateral breast cancer: one disease or two?

Our purpose was to determine whether bilateral breast cancer depends upon genetic predisposition to multiple tumors or, alternatively, represents two independent sporadic events. Biological concordance of hormone receptors and histopathology in bilateral tumors, family history of breast cancer, age at diagnosis, and survival were evaluated in 88 patients. The immunoreactivity of paired tumors from 51 patients to six different immunocytochemical markers was compared. Neither histologic patterns nor immunocytochemical reactions showed concordance between bilateral tumors. Absence of concordance (other than for estrogen receptors) and lack of associations with positive family history and early age of onset support an interpretation of independent tumor origins and does not suggest a major role for genetic determinants in the majority of cases of bilateral breast cancer.

Differential response to chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer in relation to estrogen receptor level. Results of a prospective randomized study

The predictive value of estrogen receptor (ER) level for response to chemotherapy was studied in 182 patients with metastatic breast cancer in a prospective study. Patients were stratified according to ER status and dominant site of disease and randomized to one of three regimens: cyclophosphamide, 5-Fluorouracil, and prednisone (CFP) versus CFP, methotrexate, and vincristine (CFPMV) versus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC). There was no significant differences in all response categories (P = 0.21), was taken as a predictor for response to chemotherapy, there was no significant difference in overall response (P = 0.61) between ER+ (62/108, 57%) and ER- patients (31/49, 63%). However, there was a significant trend toward a higher degree of response in ER- patients (more complete response [CR] nine of 49, 18%, and fewer failures six of 49, 12%) than in ER+ (less CR seven of 108, 7%, and more failures 37/108, 34%) (P = 0.006). Patients with higher measured levels of ER showed worse response (Kendall's tau C, P = 0.026). This trend for ER- patients to have better response than ER+ patients was generally consistent, regardless of the predominant site of metastases or chemotherapy regimen (P = 0.04 for CFP; P = 0.08 for CFPMV; and P = 0.20 for AC). The advantage of a better response for ER- patients was nullified by an earlier relapse which was reflected in longer duration of remission, time to treatment failure, and survival in favor of ER+ patients (12.3 months versus 7.3 months remission duration, 18.7 months versus 13.6 months survival in partial responders). These data suggest that ER- patients respond to a higher extent to chemotherapy but relapse sooner than ER+ patients, suggesting a more rapid growth for ER- tumors. In patients with ER- tumors and poorer prognosis on conventional chemotherapy, new trials of intensive consolidation after response should be considered.

Risk of contralateral breast cancer. Associations with histologic, clinical, and therapeutic factors

A case-control study was conducted to assess the risk factors associated with the development of a contralateral primary breast cancer among women who had had a first primary breast cancer. Hospital records were reviewed for 292 women with an incident contralateral breast cancer, diagnosed in one of eight hospitals between July 1, 1975 and December 31, 1983, and for a comparison group of 264 surviving unilateral breast cancer patients, previously diagnosed in the same hospitals. All subjects were identified through the records of the Connecticut Tumor Registry. Having an initial tumor containing lobular carcinoma was associated with an almost twofold increased risk of developing a contralateral cancer (aOR = 1.8; 95% CI: 1.0-3.5). Among those for whom a progesterone receptor assay was available, a positive assay was associated with an increased risk of a contralateral primary (aOR = 3.2; 95% CI: 1.0-9.5). AB blood type was also associated with an elevated risk, but this elevation was not statistically significant (aOR = 2.3; 95% CI: 0.7-7.7). Having received radiation treatment was not significantly associated with the risk of a contralateral primary (aOR = 0.9; 95% CI: 0.6-1.4), whereas chemotherapy treatment was associated with a significantly lowered risk (aOR = 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1-0.7). The association with chemotherapy appeared to be modified by body build (ROR = 1.5; 95% CI: 1.0-2.3 for a 2.5-unit differential in Quetelet's index).

Estrogen receptors in bilateral breast cancer

Estrogen receptor status, tumor histology, and the interval between the development of tumors were assessed in 99 patients with bilateral breast cancer. Tumors were first grouped into those simultaneously detected in both breasts or within 12 months of each other (synchronous bilateral breast cancer, of which there were 64) and second, those detected within more than 12 months of each other (asynchronous bilateral breast cancer, of which there were 35). Nineteen percent of all tumors were lobular carcinomas. Overall, the rate of receptor discordance between the two tumors was not significantly different from that previously reported between biopsies of primary tumor and metastases in patients with unilateral breast cancer. Synchronous receptor-positive tumors occurred significantly more frequently than expected, suggesting that the development of the two tumors was influenced by a common mechanism. In patients with asynchronous bilateral breast cancer there was a significantly longer interval between tumors if both were receptor-positive compared with concordant receptor-negative tumors and tumors with discordant receptor status. There was a significant discordance in the receptor status of asynchronous tumors when the histology also differed, indicating that the tumors in this group were likely to be separate primary tumors.

Steroid receptors, cellular kinetics, and lymph node status as prognostic factors in breast cancer

Steroid receptor status, cellular kinetics, abnormal proto-oncogene presence, and lymph node metastases all have been shown to provide prognostic information in breast cancer. The factors guide the choice of therapy and predict the course of the disease. Both disease-free survival and overall survival are predicted by these variables. Steroid receptors are the most reliable predictor of hormonal responsiveness. Lymph node involvement is crucial in determining the extent of the disease and the need for adjuvant therapy. Cellular kinetics and abnormal proto-oncogene presence predict tumor aggressiveness. Together these prognostic factors provide considerable information to the clinician.

Immunocytochemical study on the variation in estrogen receptors of primary and nodal metastases of breast cancer

The variation in estrogen receptors (ER) between primary and regional nodal metastatic lesions was examined by an estrogen receptor immunocytochemical assay (ER-ICA) in 25 mammary carcinoma patients. The ER status was evaluated in terms of the percentage of ER positive stained cells, staining intensity and distribution of those stained cells. The overall ER status was consistent in both sites, however, the percentage of ER positive cells and the staining intensity were not always consistent. A decrease in the percentage of ER positive cells and staining intensity was demonstrated in the nodal metastatic lesions of 4 and 3 cases out of a total 14 ER positive cases, respectively. The mean percentage of ER positive cells in the nodal metastatic lesions was 57 per cent compared with 73 per cent in primary lesions. Thus, a tendency of both the percentage of ER positive cells and the staining intensity to decrease in nodal metastases as when compared with primary lesions in breast cancer was demonstrated.

Relationship between estrogen receptor status in the primary tumor and its regional and distant metastases. An immunohistochemical study in human breast cancer

Treatment of metastatic breast cancer based on the estrogen receptor content (ER) of the primary tumor builds on the assumption that the ER status of the primary tumor and the metastases are largely equal. Studies addressing this question have used ligand-binding assays for ER determination and have consequently been subject to the limitations of this technique. Reported disparity rates have been 20%. In order to avoid some of these limitations, we used an immunohistochemical assay in paraffin-embedded tissue. Among a total of 92 examined regional lymph node metastases, ER status was equal with that of their 37 primaries in 84 cases (91%). Semiquantified ER content was significantly correlated in primary tumor and the metastases (r = 0.67, p less than 0.001). Among a total of 51 distant metastases, equal ER status was found in 44 (86%) cases and a quantitative relationship could not be established. Disparities can be due to methodological errors in the histochemical assay or tumor heterogeneity.

Estrogen and progesterone receptor content of primary and secondary breast carcinoma: influence of time and treatment

ER and PgR concentrations were assayed in primary and secondary breast carcinoma specimens from patients classified into 3 groups: (1) both specimens excised on the same occasion (61 patients); (2) specimens obtained on separate occasions with no intervening treatment (43 patients); (3) specimens obtained on separate occasions with intervening chemotherapy and/or irradiation (25 patients). There were highly significant linear correlations (P less than 0.001) between the concentrations of ER (expressed as log10) in primary and secondary specimens in all groups. The relationship between PgR concentrations in primary and secondary specimens in groups 1 and 2 was highly significant, although there appeared to be a greater tendency for loss of PgR in sequential, than in simultaneous secondary biopsies. When expressed in terms of hormone receptor status (HRS), the same rate of discordance was observed in groups 1 and 2 (30% when concentrations were expressed in terms of cytosol protein). In group 1 the major cause of discordance was the occurrence of receptor +ve secondaries in association with receptor -ve primaries, possibly because of the high cellularity of many involved axillary nodes. In group 2, the major cause of discordance was the occurrence of receptor -ve secondaries derived from receptor +ve primaries. In both groups discordance in PgR status was more frequent than in ER status. In group 3, overall discordance in HRS was 24% and was due equally to ER and PgR; however, the high concordance rate for PgR was probably due to the fact that the tumours were initially PgR -ve, and the secondaries were also -ve. These results confirm that ER content tends to be stable, even after long periods of time and the administration of chemotherapy and/or irradiation. Progesterone receptor content is much less stable, and may decrease during quite short time intervals even in the absence of treatment.

The predictive value of steroid hormone receptor analysis in breast, endometrial and ovarian cancer

The predictive value of female sex steroid, estrogen and progesterone, receptor (ER and PR, respectively) assays in breast, endometrial and ovarian cancer is reviewed with emphasis on comparative aspects of these malignant tumors in relation to their hormone dependency. The endocrine etiology of these three tumor types seems to be at least partly different, and so is the expression of these receptors in normal and malignant tissues of the breast, endometrium and ovary. There is a tendency for decreased receptor concentrations and disappearance of these receptors in association with advancement of these malignancies. There is also a decrease in the presence and concentrations of ER and PR in relation to loss of differentiation in breast and endometrial cancer. Receptor analyses have an established position in the selection of patients with advanced breast cancer for endocrine treatment, and they give promise of a similar application in endometrial cancer and in endometrioid cancer of the ovary. It is not clear whether the disease-free interval is related to the presence or concentrations of ER or PR as such in the tumor tissue. There is better survival in breast cancer patients with receptor-positive tumors, which might be due to a response to endocrine treatment. The same seems to be true for patients with endometrial cancer. Future progress in the application of female sex steroid receptor analyses in breast, endometrial and ovarian cancer needs additional controlled clinical trials and more highly developed receptor assays.