Dependence of water movement on sodium transport in kidney proximal tubule: a microperfusion study substituting lithium for sodium

The sugar daddy: the role of the renal proximal tubule in glucose homeostasis

Renal blood flow represents >20% of total cardiac output and with this comes the great responsibility of maintaining homeostasis through the intricate regulation of solute handling. Through the processes of filtration, reabsorption, and secretion, the kidneys ensure that solutes and other small molecules are either returned to circulation, catabolized within renal epithelial cells, or excreted through the process of urination. Although this occurs throughout the renal nephron, one segment is tasked with the bulk of solute reabsorption-the proximal tubule. Among others, the renal proximal tubule is entirely responsible for the reabsorption of glucose, a critical source of energy that fuels the body. In addition, it is the only other site of gluconeogenesis outside of the liver. When these processes go awry, pathophysiological conditions such as diabetes and acidosis result. In this review, we highlight the recent advances made in understanding these processes that occur within the renal proximal tubule. We focus on the physiological mechanisms at play regarding glucose reabsorption and glucose metabolism, emphasize the conditions that occur under diseased states, and explore the emerging class of therapeutics that are responsible for restoring homeostasis.

Hydrochlorothiazide attenuates lithium-induced nephrogenic diabetes insipidus independently of the sodium-chloride cotransporter

Lithium is the most common cause of nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (Li-NDI). Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) combined with amiloride is the mainstay treatment in Li-NDI. The paradoxical antidiuretic action of HCTZ in Li-NDI is generally attributed to increased sodium and water uptake in proximal tubules as a compensation for increased volume loss due to HCTZ inhibition of the Na-Cl cotransporter (NCC), but alternative actions for HCTZ have been suggested. Here, we investigated whether HCTZ exerted an NCC-independent effect in Li-NDI. In polarized mouse cortical collecting duct (mpkCCD) cells, HCTZ treatment attenuated the Li-induced downregulation of aquaporin-2 (AQP2) water channel abundance. In these cells, amiloride reduces cellular Li influx through the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC). HCTZ also reduced Li influx, but to a lower extent. HCTZ increased AQP2 abundance on top of that of amiloride and did not affect the ENaC-mediated transcellular voltage. MpkCCD cells did not express NCC mRNA or protein. These data indicated that in mpkCCD cells, HCTZ attenuated lithium-induced downregulation of AQP2 independently of NCC and ENaC. Treatment of Li-NDI NCC knockout mice with HCTZ revealed a significantly reduced urine volume, unchanged urine osmolality, and increased cortical AQP2 abundance compared with Li-treated NCC knockout mice. HCTZ treatment further resulted in reduced blood Li levels, creatinine clearance, and alkalinized urinary pH. Our in vitro and in vivo data indicate that part of the antidiuretic effect of HCTZ in Li-NDI is NCC independent and may involve a tubuloglomerular feedback response-mediated reduction in glomerular filtration rate due to proximal tubular carbonic anhydrase inhibition.

Renal handling of endogenous lithium in experimental diabetes mellitus in the rat

1. The usefulness of determining the renal handling of endogenous lithium as a marker of proximal tubular sodium reabsorption was assessed in streptozotocin induced diabetes mellitus in the Sprague-Dawley rat. 2. The clearance and fractional excretion of lithium were determined before and following the development of diabetes mellitus, and compared with measurements of proximal tubular reabsorption made directly using micropuncture techniques. Endogenous lithium was measured in order to avoid the toxic tubular effects of exogenously administered lithium salts. 3. Although a trend existed for a reduction in the fractional excretion of lithium in diabetic animals (1.8 +/- 0.3 vs 2.4 +/- 0.5%; P greater than 0.20), this did not reach statistical significance and did not accurately reflect the change in directly measured tubular Na reabsorption. 4. The decrease in proximal tubular Na reabsorption demonstrated in diabetic animals treated with phlorizin was not significantly reflected in the fractional lithium excretion, although again a corresponding trend was evident (1.9 +/- 0.8 vs 0.6 +/- 0.2%; P greater than 0.10. 5. In summary, the significant alterations in tubular Na handling in diabetes mellitus, previously demonstrated directly using micropuncture techniques, are not reflected in the renal handling of endogenous lithium. This indirect method is inadequate to assess proximal tubular Na transport in experimental diabetes mellitus.

Lithium absorption by the rabbit gall-bladder

Lithium (Li+) absorption across the low-resistance epithelium of the rabbit gall-bladder was studied in order to elucidate possible routes and mechanisms of Li+ transfer. Li+ at a concentration of 0.4 mM in both mucosal and serosal media did not affect isosmotic mucosa-to-serosa fluid absorption. At this low concentration net mucosa-to-serosa Li+ absorption was insignificant when the ambient Na+ concentration was 115 mM, although the gall-bladder had a significant Li+ permeability (2.7 X 10(-5) cm s-1) and a significant mucosa-to-serosa Li+ gradient developed as a result of fluid absorption. Net Li+ absorption was induced at reduced mucosal Na+ concentrations (by lowering the Na+ concentration down to 50 mM with or without substitution with sucrose, or by adding sucrose to the mucosal medium). This Li+ absorption occurred even in the absence of a mucosa-to-serosa Li+ gradient. Na+ and Li+ absorptions occurring at 50 mM Na+ were inhibited to the same degree by mucosal 1 mM amiloride. Substitution of 5-50 mM (44%) Na+ by Li+ in the external medium dose-dependently depressed Na+ absorption by up to 76%, while substitution by 50 mM choline had no significant effect. Li+ inhibition of Na+ absorption was elicited from the mucosal side and was not accounted for by compensatory Li+ absorption; water and Na+ absorption rates decreased nearly in parallel. The effects of 0.4 mM amiloride and of substitution with 20 mM Li+ were only partly additive. It is concluded that Li+ absorption in the rabbit gall-bladder cannot be explained by passive (paracellular) transport, but must be the result of transcellular, active transport. Both at low and at high concentrations Li+ may enter the cell via an Na+/H+ exchanger in the apical cell membrane. At high concentrations Li+ may inhibit Na+ absorption by interference with the exchange mechanism and/or via effects at the cytoplasmic level. The Li+ transfer mechanism across the basolateral cell membrane remains unknown.

Evaluation of lithium clearance as a marker of proximal tubule sodium handling

Estimations of proximal tubule sodium reabsorption with the FELi method come closer to direct measurements than any other indirect method. There is little doubt that most lithium reabsorption takes place in the proximal tubules, very likely in proportion to the reabsorption of sodium and water. It is also likely that changes in proximal tubule sodium reabsorption due to changes in volume status are paralleled by changes in proximal tubule lithium reabsorption, at least in the superficial nephrons. Nonetheless, changes in FELi probably do not purely reflect changes in proximal reabsorption, since lithium is also handled beyond the proximal tubules. Acknowledged problems are lithium reabsorption in Henle's loop and in the late distal and collecting tubules. The latter occurs in the rat and the dog, but not or much less in men. Sodium restriction enhances this lithium transport considerably. It is as yet uncertain whether other conditions, such as increased vasopressin activity or lowering of renal perfusion pressure, also influence this transport. Amiloride appears to prevent this reabsorption of lithium. Therefore, this drug can be used in lithium clearance studies whenever unwanted "distal" lithium reabsorption is expected. Lithium reabsorption in Henle's loop forms a greater problem as it cannot be prevented by any drug without influencing proximal tubule reabsorption. It is estimated that about 7% of the filtered lithium (one-tenth of total lithium reabsorption) is normally taken up here, preferentially in deep nephrons. In view of studies with furosemide, this reabsorption probably varies with sodium intake, but the proportion of this variation to that of proximal tubule lithium reabsorption is obscure. This remains an uncertain factor in any circumstance where the lithium clearance method is used. In some conditions the change in FELi may be so large relative to the expected changes in proximal reabsorption, that use of FELi as marker of end-proximal solute delivery seems unjustified. Disproportionately large suppression is likely during mineralo-corticoid-induced volume expansion, and stimulation during prostaglandin synthesis inhibition and vasopressin. Based on observations in these conditions the potential range of lithium reabsorption in the loop of Henle would be 0 to 15% of filtered load. In this review attention was paid mainly to the validity of lithium clearance as a pure "proximal marker". Many of our interpretations suffer from incomplete certainty with respect to the renal effects of tested maneuvers, a problem which is acknowledged.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Does water drag solutes through kidney proximal tubule?

Coupling of salt and water movements across kidney proximal tubules was studied in the presence of an induced transepithelial osmotic water flux. Convoluted proximal tubules from rabbit kidney were perfused in vitro with a control solution, with or without 50 mM/l of mannitol or raffinose in the both. Osmolalities of the perfused and collected fluids as well as the net water flux Jv were measured in each experiment. The net solute flux Js was calculated from the difference between the amount of total solutes delivered and collected at each end of the tubule. No apparent net transepithelial solute movements were detected in the presence of an osmotic water flux when active solute transport was inhibited either by an external to of 26 degrees C or by ouabain in the bath. The water flux observed was similar to that calculated assuming that only water crossed the epithelium, and no streaming potential was measured, whether or not active transport was blocked. It is concluded that the osmotic water flux through kidney proximal tubule does not drag a significant amount of solutes, probably because of the absence of convective solvent flux. This suggests the existence of different pathways for water and salt movement.

Lithium absorption in tight and leaky segments of intestine

There is significant absorption of Li+ by human jejunum and ileum, but negligible absorption by human colon. Thus, a proximal-to-distal gradient of decreasing Li+ absorption and increasing junctional tightness exists in intestine as well as in renal tubule. For six leaky epithelia the relative permeabilities of K+, Na+, and Li+ by the junctional route are in the sequence PK greater than PNa greater than PLi and all fall within a factor of 2.5. In contrast, for tight epithelia PLi approximately PNa much greater than PK in the amiloride-sensitive channel of the apical membrane, but PK much greater than PLi approximately PNa in the basolateral membrane. The ability of several tight epithelia to sustain nonzero transepithelial Li+ absorption despite this basolateral barrier may be due to Na+/Li+ countertransport at the basolateral membrane, resulting in secondary active transport of Li+ across the epithelium.