Parental origin and mechanism of formation of X chromosome structural abnormalities: four cases determined with RFLPs

Xp11.2 Duplication in Females: Unique Features of a Rare Copy Number Variation

Among the diseases with X-linked inheritance and intellectual disability, duplication of the Xp11.23p11.22 region is indeed a rare phenomenon, with less than 90 cases known in the literature. Most of them have been recognized with the routine application of array techniques, as these copy number variations (CNVs) are highly variable in size, occurring in recurrent and non-recurrent forms. Its pathogenic role is not debated anymore, but the information available about the pathomechanism, especially in affected females, is still very limited. It has been observed that the phenotype in females varies from normal to severe, which does not correlate with the size of the duplication or the genes involved, and which makes it very difficult to give an individual prognosis. Among the patients studied by the authors because of intellectual disability, epilepsy, and minor anomalies, overlapping duplications affecting the Xp11.23p11.22 region were detected in three females. Based on our detailed phenotype analysis, we concluded that Xp11.23p11.22 duplication is a neurodevelopmental disorder.

Autism in two females with duplications involving Xp11.22-p11.23

We present two phenotypically similar females with Xp duplication who have autism and epilepsy. Case 1 is a 14-year-old Honduran female with autism and medically refractory complex partial, secondarily generalized epilepsy. Case 2 is a 3-year-old Austrian female with autism and medically refractory complex partial epilepsy. Both patients also share features of severe intellectual disability (case 1 has a developmental quotient of 23, case 2 has a developmental quotient of 42) and dysmorphic facial features. Autism was confirmed by thorough clinical evaluations and testing. Case 1 has a karyotype of 46,X,dup(X)(p11.2-p22.33) and a highly skewed X-inactivation pattern (94:6). Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electroencephalogram (EEG) were abnormal. Case 2 has a 5-megabase duplication of Xp11.22-p11.23 on chromosome microarray analysis. The patient has a random X-inactivation pattern (77:23). Brain MRI was normal, but EEG was abnormal. Both patients have duplications involving the Xp11.22-p11.23 region, indicating that this is an area of interest for future translational autism research.

Partial Xp duplication in a girl with dysmorphic features: the change in replication pattern of late-replicating dupX chromosome

In this paper we present the case of a girl at the age of 32 months with dysmorphic features, including general muscular hypotonia, developmental delay and mental retardation. The cytogenetic analysis revealed de novo partial duplication of Xp: 46,X,dup(X)(p11.23-->p22.33: :p11.23-->p22.33). To characterize the duplication, X painting, Kallman (KAL), yeast artificial chromosomes (YACs) and bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) covering Xp11.23-->Xp22.33 region were used. Selective inactivation of the abnormal X chromosome using HpaII digestion of the AR gene was evident. After BrdU incorporation the abnormal X was late-replicating in all lymphocytes examined. There was one peculiar exception observed: the break-point region was consistently early replicating. The replicating pattern of this region corresponded to the active X chromosome. Methylation pattern of late replicating X chromosome was studied also using antibodies against 5-methylcytosine. The pattern corresponded to the normally inactive X chromosome, with the exception of the previously observed break-point region which revealed an early replicating pattern with strong fluorescent signal, similar to the pattern of the active X chromosome. The observed phenomenon could lead to the abnormal phenotype of the patient, with some normally inactive genes of the break-point region escaping the inactivation process. The abnormal clinical findings could also be due to tissue-dependent differences in the inactivation pattern.

Molecular cytogenetic identification of four X chromosome duplications

Four cases with previously unidentified X-chromosome abnormalities were studied by standard cytogenetic techniques and FISH in order to demonstrate the origin of the extra segment on the abnormal X chromosomes. All cases were identified as X-chromosome duplications by using a chromosome-specific painting probe. Application of appropriate locus-specific DNA probes as an adjunct to GTG- and RBG-banding proved useful in defining the breakpoints and the extent of the duplications. Although the duplicated X chromosome in female cases was selectively inactivated, as demonstrated by its late-replicating pattern, abnormal clinical findings were manifested in 3 female patients.

Partial X chromosome trisomy with functional disomy of Xp due to failure of X inactivation

A 5-month-old girl with mild phenotypic abnormalities, developmental delay, and seizures was found to have the de novo karyotype 46,XX,-13,+der(13)t(X;13)(p21.2;p11.1). The partial trisomy of Xp21.2-->pter was confirmed with fluorescence in situ hybridization, using an X chromosome painting probe and several cosmid and YAC probes for Xp sequences. Replication banding showed that one of the structurally normal X chromosomes was late-replicating, but that the Xp segment of the der(13) was early-replicating in all cells examined. Since segments of the X chromosome separated from the X inactivation center in Xq13.2 cannot undergo X inactivation, the result is functional disomy of distal Xp. As the loss of short arm material from chromosome 13 is not considered to be clinically significant, the genomic imbalance of Xp expressed in this patient most likely accounts for her abnormal phenotype.

Molecular cytogenetic analysis of a duplication Xp in a male: further delineation of a possible sex influencing region on the X chromosome

We describe a male infant with severe mental retardation and autism with a duplication of the short arm of the X chromosome. Chromosome painting confirmed the origin of this X duplication. Molecular cytogenetic analysis with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) identified one copy of the zinc finger protein on the X chromosome (ZFX) and two copies of the steroid sulfatase gene (STS), further delineating the breakpoints. Based on cytogenetic and molecular comparisons of cases from the literature of sex-reversal in dup(X),Y patients and our patient, we suggest that a possible secondary sex-influencing gene involved in the regulation of sex determination or testis morphogenesis is present at the distal Xp21.1 to p21.2 region.