Complications of gastrointestinal radiologic procedures: I. Complications of routine fluoroscopic studies

Colorectal perforation by self-induced hydrostatic pressure: a report of two cases

BACKGROUND

Most iatrogenic colorectal perforations occur as a result of endoscopic or fluoroscopic studies. Accidents associated with hydrostatic pressure-induced perforation are rarely reported, and self-induced hydrostatic pressure is an extremely rare cause of perforation because the anal sphincter complex may provide a protective barrier against perianal hydrostatic pressure. We present two cases of rectosigmoid colon perforation secondary to self-induced hydrostatic pressure.

CASE REPORTS

A 61-year-old man and a 45-year-old man presented with abdominal pain after forceful entry of tap water into the rectum, during rinsing of the anus after defecation in the first case, and during self-administered enema in the second case. Emergency operations were performed with the suspicion of hydrostatic pressure-induced rectal injury, and showed rectosigmoid mesenteric perforation in both cases. Resection of the diseased segment and end colostomy (Hartmann's procedure) was performed in the first case, and primary resection and anastomosis in the second case. The pathologic results showed abrupt loss of the colonic wall in the mesenteric border, without evidence of other inflammatory disease; these findings were consistent with acute mechanical colon injury. The postoperative course in both cases was uneventful.

CONCLUSION

These cases put forth an unusual type of colorectal injury, caused specifically by hydrostatic pressure, thus adding to the available literature on hydrostatic pressure-induced injury.

Routine barium enema prior to closure of defunctioning ileostomy is not necessary

PURPOSE

The use of barium enemas to confirm the anastomotic integrity prior to ileostomy closure is still controversial. The purpose of the study was to determine the utility of routine contrast enema prior to ileostomy closure and its impact on patient management in patients with a low pelvic anastomosis.

METHODS

One hundred forty-five patients had a temporary loop ileostomy constructed to protect a low colorectal or coloanal anastomosis following low anterior resection for rectal cancer. All patients were evaluated by physical examination, proctoscopy, and barium enema prior to ileostomy closure.

RESULTS

The median time from ileostomy creation to closure was 8 months. Five (3.5%) of the 144 patients were found to have clinically relevant strictures at the colorectal anastomosis on routine barium enema. One patient (0.7%) showed anastomotic leak on their barium enema. Overall, 141 patients (97.9%) had an uncomplicated postoperative course. Postoperative complication occurred in three patients (2.1%). None of them showed abnormal barium enema finding, which suggested that routine contrast enema examination did not predict postoperative complication.

CONCLUSION

Routine barium enema evaluation of low pelvic anastomoses before loop ileostomy closure did not provide any additional information for postoperative colorectal anastomotic complication.

Iatrogenic perforation at colonic imaging

AIM

Adequate colonic imaging is generally an invasive procedure with attendant risks, particularly perforation. Endoscopy, barium enema and computed tomographic colonography (CTC) are the main techniques for investigating patients with symptoms of, or screening for, colorectal cancer. The potential complications of these investigations have to be weighed against the benefits. This article reviews the literature on the incidence, presentation and management of iatrogenic colonic perforation at colonic imaging.

METHOD

A literature review of relevant studies was undertaken using PubMed, Cochrane library and personal archives of references. Manual cross-referencing was performed, and relevant references from selected articles were reviewed. Studies reporting complications of endoscopy, barium enema and CT colonography were included in this review.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies were identified comprising 640,433 colonoscopies, with iatrogenic perforation recorded in 585 patients (0.06%). The reported perforation rate with double-contrast barium enema was between 0.02 and 0.24%. Serious complications with CTC were infrequent, though nine perforations were reported in a case series of 24,365 patients (0.036%) undergoing CTC.

CONCLUSION

Perforation remains an infrequent and almost certainly under-reported, complication of all colonic imaging modalities. Risk awareness, early diagnosis and active management of iatrogenic perforation minimizes an adverse outcome.

Intestinal obstruction from inspissated barium (Barolith): a systematic review of all cases from 1950 to 2006

OBJECTIVE

Having encountered a case of large bowel obstruction secondary to a barolith and successfully treated it using colonoscopic dissolution, we systematically reviewed all cases of barolith obstruction to appreciate its incidence and explore its methods of treatment.

METHOD

A literature search was carried out in the databases British Nursing Index, Cinahal, Embase, Medline, and Pub Med. There was no restriction placed on language of publication in the search.

RESULTS

There were 22 reports describing a total of 31 cases. About one third of the reported cases were successfully treated with conservative measures including the use of laxatives. Significantly, surgery was performed in nearly half of the patients. Interestingly, endoscopic dissolution was attempted in only 3 cases and it was successful in all of them.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review reveals several reported cases of barolith obstruction from 1950-2006. Only three case reports described colonoscopic dissolution. In our institute, we have recently encountered a case of large bowel obstruction secondary to a barolith and we successfully treated it using colonoscopic dissolution. Given the absence of guidelines to treat barolith induced obstruction, we are of the opinion that should a barolith obstruction occur, in the absence of perforation or ischaemic bowel, endoscopic dissolution by an experienced endoscopist under general anaesthetic offers a safe, effective, and minimally invasive method of relieving the obstruction. Should this fail surgery is indicated.

Rectal perforations after barium enema: a review

PURPOSE

Rectal injuries during barium enema are rare but life-threatening complications. The last review about this subject was published more than ten years ago. In the present review, we present an overview on the subject and especially focus on changes in treatment strategies and developments of less risky visualization techniques.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in the PubMed library using the key words-barium enema, complications, peritonitis, and rectal perforation-as well as related articles and other references obtained from these articles.

RESULTS

The most frequent cause of perforation is iatrogenic and catheter-related. Other causes are related to weakness of the colorectal wall or obstruction. Five types of perforations have been described: 1) perforations of the anal canal below the levator; 2) incomplete perforations; 3) perforations into the retroperitoneum; 4) transmural perforations into adjacent viscera; 5) perforations into the free intraperitoneal cavity. Most incomplete perforations and one-half of the retroperitoneal perforations have minimal clinical signs. Intraperitoneal perforations lead to the most catastrophic course, starting with rectal bleeding and mild abdominal complaints. This is rapidly followed by progressive sepsis and peritonitis, and leads to a high mortality rate. Surgery is not always required for intramural or small retroperitoneal perforations. These can be treated conservatively and require surgical debridement only in case of large amounts of extravasation or abscesses. Surgical repair of large rectal mucosal lesions or anal sphincter lesions is advised. Perirectal abscesses require drainage. Intraperitoneal perforations with gross extravasation need immediate aggressive surgical treatment in a critical care setting, because the threat of shock is high. Intraperitoneal perforations, neglected perforations, gross barium extravasation, poorly prepared colon, and venous intravasation of barium are prognostically unfavorable. The severest late complication in intraperitoneal perforations is ileus. Meticulous technical performance of the barium enema is the most important factor in prevention.

CONCLUSIONS

Rectal perforations after barium enema are rare. The overall mortality rate decreased in recent decades from approximately 50 to 35 percent as the result of advances in supportive and intensive care. Because of these advances, more aggressive surgical strategies were undertaken. With the advent of endoscopy, less barium enemas are performed. Consequently, the absolute incidence of complications has decreased. It is expected that in the future barium enemas will be replaced by more sensitive and less risky techniques, such as CT colonography and magnetic resonance colonography.

The role of contrast radiography in presumed bowel obstruction

A retrospective review of 229 patients with a final diagnosis of small-bowel obstruction was undertaken to evaluate the role of contrast radiography in the management of their conditions. In 84 patients (37%) the clinical findings and plain abdominal roentgenograms were sufficient for diagnosis and subsequent management. Of the remaining 145 patients with equivocal findings, 27% had an upper gastrointestinal series, 29% a barium enema, and 44% had both. Useful information (complete obstruction, unobstructed passage of contrast, or diagnosis other than adhesional obstruction) was obtained from 86% of the radiographic studies. Three patients had negative contrast studies yet eventually underwent adhesiolysis (enterolysis) and were classified as false-negative. Two patients had evidence of high-grade obstruction yet had nonoperative resolution and were classified as false-positive. The mortality in the contrast group (7%) was not statistically different than that in the no-contrast group (7%). Contrast radiography is a safe and effective means of increasing diagnostic accuracy in patients with presumed small-bowel obstruction. (SURGERY 1989; 106: 496-501.).

From The Division of Trauma and Critical Care Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich.

Telebrix Gastro in the management of adhesive small bowel obstruction

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine whether an abdominal radiograph 8 hours after ingesting oral Telebrix Gastro is a reliable marker for non-operative management in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction.

METHODS

During a 5-year period (January 1, 1995, through December 31, 2000), 97 patients were admitted for small bowel occlusion due to adhesion with no indication for immediate surgery. All received 100 mL of Telebrix Gastro via gastric tube for small bowel obstruction due to adhesion. If the contrast reached the colon within 8 hours on plain abdominal radiograph, the test was considered to be negative.

RESULTS

126 cases of small bowel occlusions were analyzed due to recurring episodes for 11 patients. The test was negative in 113 cases (89.7%), and in this group, only two patients underwent surgery, the remaining being managed non-operatively. The 13 cases (10.3%) with a positive test for occlusion underwent surgery. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the finding of contrast media reaching the colon as an indicator for conservative treatment were 98%, 100%, and 98%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A water-soluble contrast study can be of significant help in the clinical management of patients suspected of having small bowel obstruction.

Radiologic diagnosis of gastrointestinal perforation

Perforations of the gastrointestinal tract have many causes. Holes in the wall of gastrointestinal organs can be created by blunt or penetrating trauma, iatrogenic injury, inflammatory conditions that penetrate the serosa or adventitia, extrinsic neoplasms that invade the gastrointestinal tract, or primary neoplasms that penetrate outside the wall of gastrointestinal organs. This article provides a radiologic approach for investigating the wide variety of gastrointestinal perforations. General principles about contrast agents and studies are reviewed, and then perforations in specific gastrointestinal organs are discussed.

Barium enema and endoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia: sensitivity, specificity, complications and its determinants

AIM

To analyse sensitivity, specificity and complication rate of endoscopy, and barium enema for the detection of colorectal neoplasia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A MEDLINE search was performed (1980-2000) directed at the endoscopic and radiologic literature on barium enema. Articles were selected based on the type of study, availability of sensitivity and specificity values in sizeable patient groups, and reports on complications. Sixty articles were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Endoscopy proved to have superior sensitivity for polyps in patients at high-risk for colorectal neoplasia. The role of endoscopy and radiology in average-risk screening populations is not known. Sensitivity and specificity rates ranged widely, probably due to bias. For the detection of small polyps endoscopy has superior performance, whereas sensitivity is similar for endoscopy and barium enema for the detection of larger (>1 cm) polyps and tumours. Overall, endoscopy is associated with a higher complication rate.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopy is the preferred detection method in high-risk patients. The role of endoscopy and radiology in a screening setting requires evaluation. This review provides the test characteristics of endoscopy and radiology which are relevant for a cost-effectiveness analysis. Double-contrast barium enema may play an important role for screening purposes, owing to its good sensitivity for detecting larger (>1 cm) polyps and its lack of major complications. de Zwart, I. M.et al. (2001). Clinical Radiology56, 401-409.

Value of double-contrast barium enema performed immediately after incomplete colonoscopy

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ease, completeness, and clinical utility of double-contrast barium enema (DCBE) performed immediately after incomplete colonoscopy.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

During a 30-month period, a prospective study was performed in 103 patients (79 women, 24 men) to determine the ease and completeness of DCBE immediately after failed colonoscopy and any additional useful information provided by the enema. The ease with which DCBE was performed was graded from 1 (easy) to 10 (difficult).

RESULTS

DCBE revealed the entire colon in 97 patients (94%). Incomplete DCBE was a result of obstruction and incontinence in three patients each. The mean score for ease of performing DCBE was 5.0. In 14 patients (14%), significant additional diagnostic information was provided by the immediate DCBE. In eight patients, abnormalities were identified on DCBE that had not been seen at colonoscopy (five malignant neoplasms, one diverticular mass, two extrinsic masses, and multiple strictures). In four patients, a suspected colonoscopic abnormality was excluded with DCBE findings; and in two patients, a colonoscopic abnormality was further characterized with DCBE.

CONCLUSION

Immediate DCBE after incomplete colonoscopy allows complete colonic evaluation in most cases, often adds vital diagnostic information, and eliminates repeated bowel preparation and unnecessary delay in diagnosis.

Complications of barium enema examinations: a survey of UK Consultant Radiologists 1992 to 1994

Questionnaires were sent to all Consultant Radiologists in the UK regarding complications from barium enema examinations. The 756 respondents performed a total of 738,216 examinations over the three year period 1992 to 1994. Seventy-seven Consultants (10.2%) reported a total of 82 complications including 13 deaths: an overall mortality rate of 1 in 56,786. Only three of 30 (10%) cases of bowel perforation died, as compared with nine out of 16 (56%) cases of cardiac arrhythmia. The only remaining death was a consequence of vaginal intubation. Details of all the reported complications are recorded. This was an entirely retrospective study.

Retention balloon catheters and barium enemas: attitudes, current practice and relative safety in the UK

Balloon catheters have been associated with increased morbidity and mortality leading some to believe they should be banned, yet others find them both useful and safe if used properly. Questionnaires were sent to all Consultant Radiologists in the UK to document current practice. Particular attention focused on whether eight safety aspects are considered during their use. In this entirely retrospective study complications with both balloon and standard tip catheters were recorded during the 3-year-period 1992 to 1994 to assess their relative safety. Twenty-two percent of UK Radiologists routinely used a rectal balloon. This was not associated with any increase in mortality, but extraperitoneal rectal perforation was increased by a factor of 2.5. The routine use of retention balloon catheters may not be justified.

Clinical presentation and management of iatrogenic colon perforations

BACKGROUND

Because iatrogenic colonic perforation is uncommon, surgical management of this complication has been based on the civilian trauma experience. In this study, we determine the incidence, clinical presentation, and management of colonic perforations resulting from colonoscopy or barium enema.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The medical records of all patients with colorectal perforations due to barium enema or colonoscopy seen over a 5-year period were reviewed.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients, 12 males and 9 females aged 66 +/- 16 years, undergoing evaluation for polyps and bleeding (11), diverticulosis (4), diarrhea (2), or miscellaneous indications (4) sustained colonic perforation from colonoscopy (18; 0.20%) or barium enema (3; 0.10%). Abdominal pain, 66% (13), and fever, 24% (5), were the most frequent symptoms encountered and extraluminal air, 67% (14), the most common radiologic finding. The site of perforation was the rectosigmoid in 62% (13) of patients. Eighteen patients underwent surgery; 11 within 24 hours (group I) and 7 patients within 6.0 +/- 4 days (group II). Fifty percent (9 of 18) had primary repair or resection with anastomosis without mortality. Of the 6 patients initially treated nonoperatively, 3 subsequently underwent surgery. Both deaths, one in group I and one in group II, occurred in patients who had colonic diversion for perforation following colonoscopy.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that in the absence of significant contamination either primary repair or resection and anastomosis can be performed with acceptable morbidity for iatrogenic perforations of the colon.

Quality of air contrast barium enema performed the same day as incomplete colonoscopy with air insufflation

The quality of 17 air contrast barium enemas performed the same day as incomplete colonoscopies using air insufflation was compared with 21 air contrast barium enemas performed on a different day from incomplete colonoscopies. A gastrointestinal radiologist blinded to the timing of the procedures reviewed the barium studies scoring them as 1 (unsatisfactory) to 4 (excellent) in four areas. The mean overall quality score for the air contrast barium enemas done the same day as incomplete colonoscopy was 3.29 vs. 2.97 for those done on a different day (p = 0.24). There were no significant differences in quality scores between same-day versus different-day air contrast barium enemas for the specific parameters of quality of distention, barium coating, and amount of spasm. We conclude that when colonoscopy using air insufflation is incomplete because of looping or angulation, air contrast barium enema can be done the same day without impairing the quality of the barium study.

The acute contrast enema in suspected large bowel obstruction: value and technique

In order to determine the value of the acute contrast enema (ACE) as compared to the plain abdominal film for the diagnosis of colonic obstruction and to determine the optimal technique for performing this examination, we reviewed 140 cases performed over a 4 year period. The study shows that when provided with the case history and the plain abdominal films of patients referred for an ACE the diagnosis of colonic obstruction can be made with a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 72%, whereas the ACE has a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 98%. The ACE resulted in two false negatives, one false positive and one technical failure, analysis of which has enabled an optimal technique for the performance of this examination to be recommended.

Colorectal cancer. Principles of postoperative follow-up

Monitoring patients after primary large bowel surgery for malignancy is predicated on the concept that early detection of recurrence may provide salvage treatment for cure. Knowledge of the pathologic site and stage provides important information as to the probability of recurrence and the patterns of failure that are likely to occur. Available methods to detect recurrence include clinical, roentgenographic, and serum tests that are done more frequently during the first 2 years after surgery. Monitoring plasma carcinoembryonic antigen levels can lead to identification of asymptomatic recurrences, but there is controversy about the curability of recurrences outside the liver. Newer techniques (such as computed tomographic portography, intraoperative ultrasonography, and radioimmunoguided surgery) provide greater diagnostic accuracy and lead to more appropriate procedures during "second-look" operations. For example, hepatic resection in properly selected patients offers up to a 30% chance of cure and should be pursued aggressively. A search for metachronous cancers by endoscopy also should be done. Knowledge of the potential and patterns of failure can provide a useful guide during the postoperative follow-up care of the patient with large bowel cancer.

The role of barium enema in detecting colorectal disease. A radiologist's perspective

The single-contrast barium enema examination remains useful for patients with acute diseases such as bowel obstruction, diverticulitis, appendicitis, and fistulas. It is also the procedure of choice for those patients who are too elderly, debilitated, or ill to cooperate with the maneuvers necessary for a double-contrast examination. The double-contrast technique is more sensitive than the single-contrast technique for detection of polyps, early inflammatory bowel disease, and lesions of the rectum. In the older population, there has been an increase in the incidence of colonic polyps and carcinomas in the right side of the colon. This emphasizes the need to examine the entire colon in these patients. The double-contrast barium enema is a safe, accurate, and cost-effective tool for accomplishing this. It is also recommended as the initial procedure in the examination of patients with positive results on fecal occult blood testing.

Barium enemas in the frail elderly

PURPOSE

The objective of this investigation was to determine the frequency of and predictors for inadequate barium enemas in the frail elderly.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The medical and radiologic records of 171 elderly institutionalized patients (mean age = 85.3 years), who underwent barium enema examinations, were retrospectively reviewed. The study outcome of primary interest was the radiologist's report of the adequacy of examination as indicated in the written summary of the results of the barium enema procedure.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight (51.5%) of the 171 studies were deemed inadequate, with poor bowel preparation a primary or contributing factor in 89.7% of the inadequate studies. Among a variety of demographic and clinical factors, only long-term laxative and/or cathartic use was associated with an inadequate study (odds ratio = 7.0; 95% confidence interval 2.7 to 18.0).

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate a very high frequency of inadequate barium enema examinations in the very old and suggest a need for improved methods of bowel preparation in this patient population, especially in those who are long-term users of laxatives and cathartics.

Recognition and prevention of barium enema complications

The barium enema is a safe and accurate diagnostic study of the colon but, in rare cases, complications may result. Many of these can be prevented by proper equipment and careful attention to technique. When a complication does occur, prompt recognition and management is vital in decreasing morbidity and mortality. Perforation of the bowel is the most frequent serious complication, occurring in approximately 0.02% to 0.04% of patients. Rarely the colon may burst due to excessive transmural pressure alone. However, a colon weakened by iatrogenic trauma or disease is more likely to perforate during an enema than is a normal healthy bowel. Injury to the rectal mucosa or anal canal due to the enema tip or retention balloon is probably the most common traumatic cause of barium enema perforation. Inflation of a retention balloon within a stricture, neoplasm, inflamed rectum, or colostomy stoma is particularly hazardous. Recent deep biopsy or polypectomy with electrocautery makes the bowel more vulnerable to rupture. The tensile strength of the bowel wall is impaired in elderly patients, patients receiving long-term steroid therapy, and in disease states including neoplasm, diverticulitis, inflammatory bowel disease, and ischemia. Intraperitoneal perforation leads to a severe, acute peritonitis with intravascular volume depletion. The ensuing shock may be rapidly fatal. Prompt fluid replacement and laparotomy are essential. If the patient survives the initial shock and sepsis, later complications caused by dense intraperitoneal adhesions may develop. Extraperitoneal perforation is usually less catastrophic but may result in pain, sepsis, cellulitis, abscess, rectal stricture, or fistula. Intramural extravasation often forms a persistent submucosal barium granuloma which may ulcerate or be mistaken for a neoplasm. The most dramatic complication of barium enema is venous intravasation of barium. Fortunately, this is quite rare as it may be immediately lethal. Most cases have been attributed to trauma from the enema tip or retention balloon, mucosal inflammation, or misplacement of the tip in the vagina. Bacteremia has been found in as many as 23% of patients following barium enema and, in rare cases, may cause symptomatic septicemia. Other less common complications include barium impaction, water intoxication, allergic reactions, and cardiac arrhythmias. Preparatory laxatives and cleansing enemas have been implicated in some instances of dehydration, rectal trauma, water intoxication, and perforation. Careful review of the indications for examination, previous radiographs, and clinical history will identify many of the patients at greater risk for complications so that appropriate precautions may be observed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Aspiration and the elderly

Aspiration is prevalent in the elderly but its association with impairment of oral intake and gastroesophageal reflux is often misunderstood. This paper describes the causes, pathophysiology, and consequences of aspiration and their unique features in aged persons. It also explains how videofluoroscopic evaluation can assess current function while limiting factors that result in misinformation. The management of aspiration is discussed, emphasizing the importance and difficulties in maintaining functional well-being and possible complications of therapy.

Same-day versus separate-day sigmoidoscopy and double contrast barium enema: a randomized controlled study

A randomized controlled study was carried out in 400 patients to investigate whether same-day sigmoidoscopy impairs the quality of a double contrast barium enema. There was no difference with regard to spasm, fluid, and air retention as well as barium coat in patients undergoing both procedures during the same day or on different days. The overall quality of the radiographic films received similar ratings in a blind appraisal by an outside radiologist. In contrast, the performance of sigmoidoscopy was facilitated by the more thorough bowel cleansing for same-day procedures. It is concluded that same-day sigmoidoscopy and double contrast barium enema diminishes the cost and patient discomfort for colonic investigation without impairing its quality, provided that CO2 instead of air is used during the endoscopic study.

Should colonoscopy be the first investigation for colonic disease?

Many patients with suspected colonic disease undergo rigid sigmoidoscopy, barium enema examination, and ultimately total colonoscopy, but the need for preliminary radiology has not been formally assessed. A total of 168 patients requiring large bowel investigation were therefore randomised to undergo either rigid sigmoidoscopy plus double contrast barium enema examination or total colonoscopy. Disease was found in 56 patients, including 14 with a carcinoma, 11 with polyps, and 16 with inflammatory bowel disease, the remainder having diverticular disease alone. Of the 89 patients allocated to double contrast barium enema examination, nine required a subsequent colonoscopy for suspected tumour or polyps, three because of incomplete radiological examination, and 12 for rectal bleeding for which no cause was found at the radiological examination. In 16 patients this yielded further information or altered treatment. Of the 79 patients undergoing total colonoscopy, only six required subsequent radiology. As both procedures were well tolerated with no major complications total colonoscopy may be the preferred initial investigation where facilities allow.

Pneumoperitoneum, omental emphysema and intramural barium perforation following double contrast barium enema

Perforation above the peritoneal reflection is a rare complication of a barium enema. We describe a case in which perforation in the transverse colon during a double contrast study resulted in intramural extravasation of barium, pneumoperitoneum and omental emphysema.

Endoscopy or radiography?--The patient's choice. Prospective comparative survey of patient acceptability of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and radiography

Patient acceptability of endoscopy and the double-contrast barium meal test was compared in a prospective randomized fashion. Ninety-six inpatients were interviewed with a standardized questionnaire within 24 hours of completion of double-contrast barium meal test and endoscopy, after recovery from administered sedation. Twenty-five percent of patients reported moderate to severe discomfort with each procedure. The levels of discomfort reported were similar for both procedures. The majority of patients would readily undergo a repeated procedure, if requested. There was a tendency (p less than 0.1) for patients to prefer endoscopy overall. No specific patient group that preferred one procedure over the other could be identified, although older patients (more than 55 years) showed a tendency to prefer endoscopy. The choice of one procedure over the other should no longer be based on the presumed superior acceptability of the double-contrast barium meal test.

Gastrografin aspiration in a 3 3/4-year-old girl

A case of Gastrografin aspiration in a 3 3/4-year-old child admitted for multiple trauma is described.

Severe allergic reaction: an unusual complication of barium enema

This article describes a severe allergic reaction to a barium sulfate compound used during double-contrast colon examination. This unusual complication is probably induced by chemical agents used as additives in the commercially available barium preparations. The pertinent literature is briefly reviewed.

Barium peritonitis. Experience of five pediatric cases

Barium peritonitis secondary to perforation of the gut is an infrequent complication of radiological G-I tract examinations. It is thought to imply a high mortality rate. However, this conception seems to be based on data obtained during the early 1950's. More recent case reports and small series indicate a more favourable prognosis depending on effective antibiotics and successful maintenance of severely ill patients. The scant information concerning the fate of pediatric cases warranted presentation of the experience of 5 patients, who all survived. Our approach to treatment and the suggested use of barium studies, in particular barium enema, in obscure abdominal emergency cases are offered.