Pharyngoesophageal interrelationships: observations and working concepts

Inter-rater reliability and clinical relevance of subjective and objective interpretation of videofluoroscopy findings

Background

Dysphagia is commonly evaluated using videofluoroscopy (VFS). As its ratings are usually subjective normal-abnormal ratings, objective measurements have been developed. We compared the inter-rater reliability of the usual VFS ratings to the objective measurement VFS ratings and evaluated their clinical relevance.

Methods

Two blinded raters analyzed the subjective normal-abnormal ratings of 77 patients' VFS. Two other blinded raters analyzed the objective measurements of pharyngeal aerated area with bolus held in the oral cavity (PAhold), the pharyngeal area of residual bolus during swallowing (PAmax), the pharyngeal constriction ratio (PCR), the maximum pharyngoesophageal segment opening (PESmax), pharyngoesophageal segment opening duration (POD), airway closure duration (ACD), and total pharyngeal transit time (TPT). We evaluated the inter-rater agreement in the subjective ratings and the objective measurements. Clinical utility analysis compared the measurements with the VFS findings of pharyngeal phase abnormality, penetration/aspiration, and cricopharyngeal relaxation.

Results

In the pharyngeal findings, the subjective analysis inter-rater agreement was mainly moderate to strong. The strongest agreements were on the pharyngeal residues and penetration/aspiration findings. The objective measurements had fair to good inter-rater agreement. Clinical utility analysis found statistically significant connections between TPT and pharyngeal phase abnormality, normal PCR and lack of penetration/aspiration, and normal PESmax and normal cricopharyngeal relaxation.

Conclusions

The subjective analysis had moderate to strong inter-rater agreement in the pharyngeal VFS findings, especially concerning pharyngeal residues and penetration/aspiration detection, reflecting the efficacy and safety of swallowing. The objective measurements had fair to good inter-observer reproducibility and could thus improve the reliability of VFS diagnostics.

Level of evidence

4.

Implementation of Esophageal Screening in an Outpatient Hospital-Based Setting: A Quality Improvement Project

PURPOSE

Despite evidence supporting interconnectivity of oropharyngeal and esophageal swallowing, evaluation and treatment are dichotomized. When the videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) only considers oropharyngeal swallowing, the full scope of swallowing impairment may be missed. A lower rate of esophageal screening in an outpatient hospital setting may result from lack of speech-language pathologist (SLP) training and understanding of screening feasibility. This project was an internal quality improvement project (QIP) at Mayo Clinic in Arizona to (a) educate and train SLPs on conducting the Robust Esophageal Screening Test (REST) and (b) determine the feasibility of REST protocol implementation in a multidisciplinary swallow clinic.

METHOD

Fishbone analysis was used to identify potential causes of the gap in quality. Six Sigma methodology was used to outline the QIP. SLPs were trained in the REST protocol. To ensure adequate training, reliability ratings were assessed with the Cohen's kappa statistic. Esophageal screening via REST was implemented as an adjunct to the standard protocol during VFSS over a 3-month period for referred patients with dysphagia. Clinical findings were recorded.

RESULTS

All clinical rater SLPs reached the threshold of κ = .8 to ensure adequate rater reliability. Among 136 outpatients who underwent esophageal screening via REST, 100 patients completed the full REST screening and 36 completed a partial REST screening. Of the 100 full screenings, 80 patients had a failed screening, which indicated a potential esophageal swallowing impairment. Findings were discussed by members of the multidisciplinary dysphagia care team.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this QIP show that focusing on assessment of dysfunction and interplay across the swallowing continuum can substantially improve patient care by expediting and specifying next steps of the multidisciplinary dysphagia care team.

The Introduction of a Protocol for Esophageal Screening in Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Studies: Exploring Clinical Impacts and Barriers

PURPOSE

Esophageal screening is a valuable inclusion in videofluoroscopic swallowing studies (VFSSs). However, routine standardized esophageal screening does not always occur in clinical practice. This study introduced and evaluated an esophageal screening protocol at one Australian hospital.

METHOD

Radiology, gastroenterology, and speech-language pathology endorsed an esophageal screening protocol, which followed a timed 20-ml International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative Level 0 bolus from mouth to stomach in an upright anterior-posterior position. Measures exploring clinical impacts and barriers were recorded. Participants were compared with 100 consecutive VFSS patients prior to the introduction of the esophageal screening protocol.

RESULTS

During the esophageal screening protocol trial, 163 VFSSs were conducted with recruited patients. Aspiration risk (29%, n = 47/163) and positioning limitation (3%, n = 5/163) were barriers to esophageal screening. Rates of esophageal screening significantly increased with the esophageal screening protocol (χ2 = 63.462, p < .001). There was no difference in radiation dose for patients who had esophageal screening and those who did not in the esophageal screening protocol group (U = 1689.000, p = .237). The VFSS team breached the esophageal screening protocol for some patients, when evaluating esophageal transit time (n = 28) and recommending gastroenterology referral (n = 6). There was no difference between groups for rates of gastroenterology consults (χ2 = 1.805, p = .188) or dysphagia procedures (χ2 = 1.951, p = .209).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that routine esophageal screening provides additional clinical information to assist holistic dysphagia management without adverse operational impacts. Further research with the multidisciplinary dysphagia team has commenced to continue to optimize and refine esophageal screening practice.

The Modified Barium Swallow Study and Esophageal Screening: A Survey of Clinical Practice Patterns

PURPOSE

Modified barium swallow study (MBSS) is a videofluoroscopic evaluation of oropharyngeal swallowing. Views of esophageal bolus flow during MBSS are permitted under speech-language pathology practice guidelines. However, controversy exists over its implementation. Poor consensus and limited practice guidance may lead to clinical practice variations. Aims of the investigation were to (a) describe current practice patterns of speech-language pathologist visualizing bolus flow through the esophagus during the MBSS, (b) understand areas of variation when incorporating esophageal visualization during the MBSS, and (c) determine clinicians' willingness to modify MBSS procedures to include esophageal imaging.

METHOD

A web-based survey (Qualtrics XM) consisting of 26 questions was distributed via web posting and e-mail to members of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Special Interest Group 13 and Dysphagia Café. The survey was open for 3 months. Descriptive and associative statistics were completed. Field-testing was performed prior to dissemination of the survey to address content validity.

RESULTS

A total of 321 individuals participated; 265 responses were used for analysis. Ninety-three percent of respondents viewed the esophagus during the MBSS. Twelve percent followed to the proximal esophagus, 15% to the mid esophagus, 66% to the lower esophagus, and 6% to varied levels. Variability was also reported in contrast type, volume administered, and nomenclature used. Interestingly, few people (3.61%) disagreed that esophageal visualization should be performed during MBSS.

CONCLUSIONS

Speech-language pathology respondents in this study visualize contrast flow through the esophagus and are enthusiastic about expanding the standard MBSS. However, results of the survey demonstrate a lack of uniformity in assessment practices. Unfortunately, this may impact the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility when adding esophageal visualization to the MBSS. This study highlights the need for a standardized protocol and identifies current barriers and controversies that may prevent expanding the MBSS to more comprehensively evaluate individuals with dysphagia.

Abnormal Esophageal Clearance Identified During Modified Barium Swallow Study in an Acute Poststroke Cohort

PURPOSE

Dysphagia impacts many poststroke survivors with wide-ranging prevalence in the acute and chronic phases. One relatively unexplored manifestation of poststroke swallowing impairment is that of primary or co-occurring esophageal dysphagia. The incidence of esophageal dysphagia in this population is unknown despite the shared neuroanatomy and physiology with the oropharynx. We aimed to determine the presence of abnormal esophageal clearance in an acute poststroke sample using the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP) Component 17 (esophageal clearance) as our outcome measure.

METHOD

We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional, cohort study of 57 poststroke patients with acute, first-ever, ischemic strokes. All participants received a modified barium swallow study (MBSS) using the MBSImP protocol and scoring metrics. Swallowing impairment was determined using a combination of MBSImP scores and Penetration-Aspiration Scale scores. Swallowing outcome measures were collected including Functional Oral Intake Scale and International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) scores. We performed tests of association and logistic regression analysis to determine if statistically significant associations exist between judgments of esophageal clearance and other swallowing impairments and/or swallowing outcome measures.

RESULTS

In our study of poststroke patients who received an MBSS as part of their care, 57.9% had abnormal esophageal clearance. Statistically significant associations were also identified in measures of pharyngeal physiology (MBSImP scores) and swallowing outcome measures (IDDSI scores and alternate means of nutrition).

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal esophageal clearance was identified in greater than half of our poststroke patients. There is a dearth of scientific research regarding esophageal function poststroke. While esophageal visualization during the MBSS is not diagnostic of esophageal impairment, it may serve as an indicator for those poststroke patients who require dedicated esophageal testing to best determine the full nature of their swallowing pathophysiology and make the most effective treatment recommendations.

Visualizing the Esophagus During Modified Barium Swallow Studies: A Systematic Review

Purpose Despite the emphasis on using evidence-based practice for patient care, as clinicians, we sometimes find that there is insufficient evidence to support our clinical practices. One example of this is the "contentious" inclusion of routine, standardized visualization of the esophagus during modified barium swallow studies (MBSSs). This review sought to investigate the evidence for inclusion of routine esophageal visualization during the MBSS, a practice that is supported by the long-established interrelationship between all aspects of the oral, pharyngeal, and esophageal swallowing continuum. Method Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL databases. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines were followed to identify articles that met prespecified inclusion and exclusion terms. Results Five articles were included in this review, which identified that esophageal findings were present in 48.67% of those participants whose MBSS included esophageal visualization. Conclusion This review supports a standardized, validated, reliable visualization protocol of the esophagus during the MBSS as a critical component to the accurate diagnosis and formulation of treatment recommendations for patients with swallowing disorders.

Oesophageal screening during videofluoroscopy: International practices and perspectives of speech-language pathologists

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate international oesophageal screening (OS) practices during videofluoroscopy (VFS) amongst speech-language pathologists (SLPs) and to establish SLP perspectives regarding OS during VFS.Method: A 25-item online survey was developed and disseminated internationally. Respondents were SLPs with dysphagia and VFS experience. Information was sought on OS practices and perspectives. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse results.Result: A total of 202 SLPs completed the survey from USA, UK, Ireland, New Zealand, Australia and Austria. Fifty-eight per cent (n = 117/202) of SLPs internationally include an OS during VFS. This rate varies across USA (81%; 91/113), UK (69%; 18/26) and Ireland (60%; 18/30). Only 25% (29/117) of SLPs use a validated OS protocol. Most SLPs perform an OS in an anterior-posterior view (55%; 64/117) with patients seated (54%; 64/117). Bolus consistencies administered vary greatly. SLPs evaluate oesophageal bolus clearance (81% (95/117), bolus redirection (64%; 75/117), oesophageal transit time (49%; 57/117) and oesophageal pathology (11%; 13/117). Perceived challenges include scope of practice, patient positioning, protocol uncertainty and multidisciplinary support.Conclusion: Over half of SLPs internationally responding to the survey include an OS during VFS. Few follow validated protocols and analysis practices vary. OS guidelines and training opportunities are needed to ensure validated OS protocols are adopted into clinical practice.

The Emerging Importance of High-Resolution Manometry in the Evaluation and Treatment of Deglutition in Infants, Children, and Adults: New Opportunities for Speech-Language Pathologists

Purpose Diagnostic precision and prolonged testing before, during, and after deglutition is lacking across the age spectrum. Conventional clinical evaluation and radiologic methods are widely used but are reliant on human perception, carrying the risk of subjectivity. High-resolution manometry (HRM) is an emerging clinical and research tool and has the capability to objectively measure the dynamics, kinetics, regulatory, and correlation aspects of deglutition. Method We review the basics of manometry and the methods, metrics, and applications of this technology across the age spectrum. The goal is to aid in the translation of HRM from research tool to clinical use by the speech-language pathologist in the development of better global plans to understand normal and abnormal deglutition. Results HRM is an easily adaptable precise diagnostic tool that can be used to examine deglutition phases and abnormalities across the age spectrum from neonates to nonagenarians and can be a valuable adjunct to specialty evaluation of persistent deglutition disorders. Conclusion New opportunities will emerge upon further research for larger-scale translation once normative data and recognition of biomarkers of abnormality are ascertained.

Pharyngeal Versus Esophageal Stasis: Accuracy of Symptom Localization

Purpose The purpose of this article was to determine whether patients who complain of bolus stasis are accurate at localizing bolus stasis as measured by a videofluoroscopic swallowing study with an esophagram. Method This study used a prospective analysis of outcomes data from the University of Wisconsin-Madison Voice and Swallow Outcomes database in patients with complaints of bolus stasis who completed the combined videofluoroscopic swallowing study and esophagram to determine the accuracy of bolus stasis localization. Results Dysphagia evaluation was completed in 301 patients with complaints of bolus stasis. Patients with complaints of bolus stasis in the throat (i.e., pharynx and cervical esophagus) were less accurate at localizing bolus stasis than patients with complaints in the thoracic esophagus (p < .001). Esophageal stasis was the most common finding regardless of complaint location. Conclusion Patients are poor at localizing bolus stasis, and esophageal stasis is common in patients who complain of pharyngeal stasis. This work supports a comprehensive evaluation of both the pharynx and the esophagus for patients with complaints of bolus stasis in the throat. Future research should focus on identifying symptom profiles that could lead to targeted swallowing evaluations based on patient history and complaint.

Esophageal Transit Times Vary with Underlying Comorbid Disease

Objectives

Little is known about esophageal transit times (ETT) in relation to underlying comorbid disease or aspiration risk. Our study evaluated liquid ETT in patients relative to underlying comorbid disease and compared this with ETT in healthy adults. We examined whether prolonged ETT was associated with swallow risk.

Study Design

Prospective observational study.

Setting

Radiology department.

Subjects

Patients included those referred to speech pathology for a videofluoroscopic study of swallowing (VFSS) within a tertiary hospital.

Methods

A total of 617 patients (49% female; mean ± SD age, 77 ± 15 years) and 139 healthy adults (56% female; age, 59 ± 22 years) were included. All patients underwent a standardized VFSS with esophageal screening. Patients were categorized by chief underlying disorder: previous stroke (n = 207), other neurologic condition (n = 188), respiratory conditions (n = 91), or gastroenterology conditions (n = 131). All VFSSs were analyzed with objective measures. ETT and penetration-aspiration scores were compared between groups.

Results

Advancing age was significantly associated with increased ETT ( P < .05). When controlling for age, mean 20-mL ETT remained significantly different across groups: healthy adults, 11 seconds; stroke, 17 seconds; other neurologic condition, 15 seconds; gastroenterology, 14 seconds; and respiratory, 9 seconds ( P < .001). One-third of patients aspirated; no healthy adults aspirated. Increasing ETT was associated with aspiration events ( P < .001).

Conclusions

Liquid ETTs differ among patients with different underlying primary diagnoses. Patients following stroke show significantly prolonged ETT and increased risk of aspiration. Prolonged ETT may influence symptom complaint and warrants consideration.

Pharyngeal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease

This article discusses the extraesophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease, focusing primarily on the gamut of pharyngeal abnormalities that can be detected on barium swallows. Abnormalities of pharyngeal swallowing caused by gastroesophageal reflux are illustrated. We particularly emphasize how pharyngoesophageal relationships can guide the radiologist for performing tailored barium swallows to optimally evaluate pharyngeal abnormalities in patients with underlying gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Inter-rater reliability for speech-language therapists' judgement of oesophageal abnormality during oesophageal visualization

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal abnormalities are common findings in a speech-language therapy videofluoroscopy clinic. Fluoroscopic screening involving oropharynx alone fails to identify these patients. Oesophageal screening as an adjunct to videofluoroscopy is gaining popularity. Yet currently, little is known about the reliability of speech and language therapists' judgement of the oesophageal phase.

AIM

To measure the inter-rater reliability of oesophageal abnormality judgement in speech and language therapists during upright videofluoroscopy.

METHODS & PROCEDURES

Seventy-four speech and language therapists were trained in oesophageal physiology and oesophageal visualization. Participants were asked to provide a rating of bolus transit (> or <15 s) for 10 segments of videofluoroscopy with oesophageal visualization showing ingestion of one 20 ml fluid barium bolus. Participants then provided a binary judgement of (1) the presence of stasis, (2) the presence of redirection and (3) the need for referral for further investigation. If stasis were present, they then rated the level of stasis as cervical, aortic or thoracic.

OUTCOMES & RESULTS

Participants achieved substantial agreement for bolus transit time, presence of stasis, presence of redirection and need for referral (K = 1.0.63.63 and .61 respectively). The level of stasis achieved only fair agreement (K = .22) with disagreement primarily between aortic, thoracic or aortic/thoracic across clinicians.

CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS

Speech and language therapists demonstrated substantial agreement in judging oesophageal abnormality during videofluoroscopy. Oesophageal screening as an adjunct to videofluoroscopy can be used reliably in trained clinicians.

Can patients determine the level of their dysphagia?

AIM

To determine if patients can localise dysphagia level determined endoscopically or radiologically and association of gender, age, level and pathology.

METHODS

Retrospective review of consecutive patients presenting to dysphagia hotline between March 2004 and March 2015 was carried out. Demographics, clinical history and investigation findings were recorded including patient perception of obstruction level (pharyngeal, mid sternal or low sternal) was documented and the actual level of obstruction found on endoscopic or radiological examination (if any) was noted. All patients with evidence of obstruction including oesophageal carcinoma, peptic stricture, Schatzki ring, oesophageal pouch and cricopharyngeal hypertrophy were included in the study who had given a perceived level of dysphagia. The upper GI endoscopy reports (barium study where upper GI endoscopy was not performed) were reviewed to confirm the distance of obstructing lesion from central incisors. A previously described anatomical classification of oesophagus was used to define the level of obstruction to be upper, middle or lower oesophagus and this was compared with patient perceived level.

RESULTS

Three thousand six hundred and sixty-eight patients were included, 42.0% of who were female, mean age 70.7 ± 12.8 years old. Of those with obstructing lesions, 726 gave a perceived level of dysphagia: 37.2% had oesophageal cancer, 36.0% peptic stricture, 13.1% pharyngeal pouches, 10.3% Schatzki rings and 3.3% achalasia. Twenty-seven point five percent of patients reported pharyngeal level (upper) dysphagia, 36.9% mid sternal dysphagia and 25.9% lower sternal dysphagia (9.5% reported multiple levels). The level of obstructing lesion seen on diagnostic testing was upper (17.2%), mid (19.4%) or lower (62.9%) or combined (0.3%). When patients localised their level of dysphagia to a single level, the kappa statistic was 0.245 (P < 0.001), indicating fair agreement. 48% of patients reporting a single level of dysphagia were accurate in localising the obstructing pathology. With respect to pathology, patients with pharyngeal pouches were most accurate localising their level of dysphagia (P < 0.001). With respect to level of dysphagia, those with pharyngeal level lesions were best able to identify the level of dysphagia accurately (P < 0.001). No association (P > 0.05) was found between gender, patient age or clinical symptoms with their ability to detect the level of dysphagia.

CONCLUSION

Patient perceived level of dysphagia is unreliable in determining actual level of obstructing pathology and should not be used to tailor investigations.

Esophageal Swallowing Timing Measures in Healthy Adults During Videofluoroscopy

Objectives:

Establishing the range of normal esophageal bolus transit times (ETT) is valuable when distinguishing pathology from normal variance, especially in elderly patients, and has not been documented for paste or pill. The aim of this study was to measure esophageal transit of liquid, paste, and pill during upright videofluoroscopy.

Methods:

One hundred eighteen healthy adults (mean age 54; range 20-98 years; SD = 21.40) with no complaints of dysphagia completed a videofluoroscopy with esophageal visualization including 20 ml liquid barium, 5 ml paste, and pill.

Results:

Mean ETTs were: 20 ml fluid, 10.7 seconds (SD = 13.6, median = 5.76, IQR = 4.33, range, 2.0-60.0); pill, 25.3 seconds (SD = 24.0, median = 12.70, IQR = 49.81, range, 1.0-60.0); paste, 28.6 seconds (SD = 23.31, median = 17.47, IQR = 53, range, 4.0-60.0). Age was significantly associated with increasing 20 ml fluid ETT ( P < .001) but not pill ( P = .58) or paste ETT ( P = .12). Fluid ETT over 10 seconds occurred in 10% of participants between 20 and 59 years, in comparison to 35% over 60 years ( P < .001).

Conclusions:

These normative values provide a standardized protocol and guidance in interpretation when completing esophageal visualization as part of videofluoroscopy. While measuring fluid ETT may support referral for further specialist investigations, slower paste and pill ETT may be normal findings. Age-related slowing in fluid ETT was seen in healthy adults. Further investigation of ETT is needed in both normal and dysphagic subjects.

Esophageal Visualization as an Adjunct to the Videofluoroscopic Study of Swallowing

Objective

Complaints of dysphagia for solids lead to speech-language pathology (SLP) referral. Yet many of these patients are later diagnosed with esophageal rather than oropharyngeal dysphagia. Fluoroscopic screening involving the oropharynx alone fails to identify these patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of esophageal abnormalities in an SLP-led videofluoroscopic study of swallowing (VFSS) clinic.

Study Design

Prospective, observational study.

Setting

Radiology suite, public hospital.

Subjects and Methods

In total, 111 consecutive mixed-etiology patients referred to the clinic by otorhinolaryngology (ORL) (59) or by a speech-language pathologist (52) were recruited. A VFSS was performed according to protocol, and at completion, esophageal visualization (in anterior-posterior plane) was performed by administration of a large liquid barium bolus and a barium capsule. All VFSS recordings were analyzed using objective digital measures of timing and displacement.

Results

Sixty-eight percent of patients had an abnormal esophageal transit. One-third of those referred presented exclusively with esophageal abnormalities, while one-third had both oropharyngeal and esophageal abnormalities. Oral abnormalities, reduced pharyngoesophageal segment maximum opening (PESmax), and increasing age were significantly associated with esophageal abnormalities.

Conclusion

Fluoroscopic evaluation of the pharynx alone, without esophageal review, risks incomplete diagnosis of patients with esophageal disorders. Using esophageal visualization allows timely referral for further investigation by appropriate medical specialties, avoiding incomplete management of patients with dysphagia.

Oropharyngeal and Esophageal Swallowing Impairments: Their Association and the Predictive Value of the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile and Combined Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance—Esophageal Manometry

Objectives:

Deglutition is a highly integrated process of neural signaling and coordinated muscular contraction that begins with bolus preparation in the oral cavity and ends with closure of the lower esophageal sphincter after bolus passage. The goal of this study was to examine the relationship between measures of oropharyngeal and esophageal swallow function.

Methods:

A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent modified barium swallow study (MBSS) and multichannel intraluminal impedance–esophageal manometry (MII-EM) over 7 years at an academic institution. The MBSS was scored with the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP). Associations between impairments as measured by the MBSImP and MII-EM were assessed with a 2-sided Fisher's exact test.

Results:

One hundred sixty-four patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. Comparison of MBSImPcomponent and oral and pharyngeal total regional scores to MII-EM scores revealed a significant association between abnormal esophageal clearance on MBSS (MBSImP component 17) and abnormal findings on MII-EM (p < 0.001). Delay in initiation of pharyngeal swallow (MBSImPcomponent 6) was significantly associated with abnormal esophageal clearance on MBSS (p = 0.023).

Conclusions:

Abnormal esophageal clearance on MBSS (MBSImP component 17) indicates a need for further esophageal testing. A functional interrelationship between abnormalities of oropharyngeal and esophageal swallowing does exist, illuminating the importance of thorough pharyngoesophageal examination for dysphagia symptoms.

Esophageal Considerations After Spinal Cord Injury

Speech-Language Pathologists (SLPs) are frequently involved with patients after spinal cord injury due to the frequency of speech and swallowing problems. Any stage of swallowing can be adversely affected, and it is imperative that the SLP be aware that spinal cord injuries at various levels can produce a variety of deficits affecting oropharyngeal, esophageal, and many other functions. The SLP has a role in assessment and treatment of oropharyngeal dysphagia and also in recognizing how and when this injury should lead to screening and referral for disorders in the esophageal stage.

Evidence for oesophageal visceral hypersensitivity and aberrant symptom referral in patients with globus

We tested the hypotheses that globus patients demonstrate oesophageal visceral hypersensitivity and aberrant viscerosomatic referral of oesophageal stimuli. Oesophageal visceral perception was assessed by oesophageal balloon distension and electrical stimulation in nine patients with globus and compared with 11 healthy controls. Oesophageal perception and pain thresholds were determined. Subjects recorded the area of thoracic viscerosomatic referral on a body map in response to each stimulus. All the patients reported their first sensation at balloon volumes between 2 and 6 mL whereas controls reported their first sensation at volumes between 3 and 14 mL (P = 0.03). All the patients reported pain at balloon volumes between 5 and 12 mL whereas controls experienced pain at volumes between 8 and 20 mL (P = 0.001). In response to electrical stimulation to the oesophagus patients and controls demonstrated comparable sensory thresholds. In response to oesophageal balloon distension seven of nine patients, but no controls, referred the sensation to the region at or above the suprasternal notch (P = 0.001). Similarly, significant differences in viscerosomatic referral pattern were observed in response to oesophageal electrical stimulation (P = 0.03). Patients with globus demonstrate oesophageal visceral hypersensitivity to mechanical distension. The differential responses to stretch and electrical stimuli may indicate that the hypersensitivity is a peripheral, rather than central, phenomenon. The aberrant referral of oesophageal sensations in response to both mechanical and electrical stimulation supports the hypothesis that referral of symptoms to the neck might be a central phenomenon.

Patient localization of esophageal dysphagia

The accuracy of patients' symptom localization in dysphagia is not clear. This study aims to determine the accuracy of patient localization and to determine the correlation of localization with motility disorders. We reviewed 100 patients after completion of EGD, manometry, and a dysphagia questionnaire. Proximal and midesophageal localization were rarely associated with a proximal cause of dysphagia. Distal localization correlated in 80% of cases. Fifty-seven percent of patients reporting diffuse symptoms had manometric abnormalities, but only 9% of patients with manometric abnormalities reported diffuse symptoms. In conclusion, patient localization in esophageal dysphagia is not accurate. The data suggest that proximal localization is especially inaccurate, whereas distal localization may be more accurate. Finally, there is no correlation between diffuse localization and diagnosis of motility disorders.

Biomechanics of failed deglutitive upper esophageal sphincter relaxation in neurogenic dysphagia

Our aims were to examine the etiology and biomechanical properties of the nonrelaxing upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and the relationship between UES opening and failed relaxation. We examined the relationships among swallowed bolus volume, intrabolus pressure, sagittal UES diameter, the pharyngeal swallow response, and geniohyoid shortening in 18 patients with failed UES relaxation, 23 healthy aged controls, and 15 with Zenker's diverticulum. Etiology of failed UES relaxation was 56% medullary disease, 33% Parkinson's or extrapyramidal disease; and 11% idiopathic. Extent of UES opening ranged from absent to normal and correlated with preservation of the pharyngeal swallow response (P = 0.012) and geniohyoid shortening (P = 0.046). Intrabolus pressure was significantly greater compared with aged controls (P < 0.001) or Zenker's diverticulum (P < 0.001). The bolus volume-dependent increase in intrabolus pressure evident in controls was not observed in failed UES relaxation. The nonrelaxing UES therefore displays a constant loss of sphincter compliance throughout the full, and potentially normal, range of expansion during opening. Adequacy of UES opening is influenced by the degree of preservation of the pharyngeal swallow response and hyolaryngeal traction. In contrast, the stenotic UES displays a static loss of compliance, only apparent once the limit of sphincter expansion is reached.

Value of pharyngography in patients without suprasternal symptoms

The purpose of the present paper was to determine if pharyngeal or cervical oesophageal lesions may present with distal symptoms. All patients presenting for barium swallow underwent examination of the pharynx and oesophagus. The pharyngeal examination included spot films of the pharynx as well as views of the pharyngo-oesophageal segment filmed at three frames per second. During the 18-month period of the present study interrogations were carried out to identify patients without symptoms in the cervical or suprasternal region. One hundred and twelve patients were identified; 58 were male and 54 were female. The age range was 18-84 years. Examinations revealed abnormalities within the pharynx in 42 patients (38%); of this group of 42, 34 also had an oesophageal abnormality. The majority of the pharyngeal findings were minor. There were, however, three patients who each had a pharyngeal abnormality (pharyngeal carcinoma, obstructive cricopharyngeal narrowing, pharyngo-oesophageal junction stricture) as well as an oesophageal lesion (hiatal hernia, achalasia, reflux oesophagitis), either of which may have been the source of the symptoms. The remaining eight patients (7%) of this group of 42 with detected pharyngeal abnormality had normal oesophageal examinations. Most of these were again minor changes and were unlikely to be significant. There was, however, one patient in whom the only abnormality was an infiltrative cancer of the posterior wall of the pharyngo-oesophageal junction. In conclusion, the identification of patients in the present study with pharyngeal lesions and without distal abnormal findings indicates that a proximal lesion may present with downstream symptoms. Furthermore, there were also patients in whom the examination found abnormalities in multiple segments of the pharynx and oesophagus. We suggest that examination of the pharynx is warranted as part of the barium swallow in patients without cervical or suprasternal symptoms.

Pathophysiological mechanisms of oropharyngeal dysphagia in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

We investigated the pathophysiological mechanisms of dysphagia in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Forty-three patients with sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis were examined by clinical and electrophysiological methods that objectively measured the oropharyngeal phase of voluntarily initiated swallowing, and these results were compared with those obtained from 50 age-matched control subjects. Laryngeal movements were detected by a piezoelectric sensor and EMG of submental muscles, and needle EMG of the cricopharyngeal muscle of the upper oesophageal sphincter of both the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and control groups was recorded during swallowing. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients with dysphagia displayed the following abnormal findings. (i) Submental muscle activity of the laryngeal elevators, which produce reflex upward deflection of the larynx during wet swallowing, was significantly prolonged whereas the laryngeal relocation time of the swallowing reflex remained within normal limits. (ii) The cricopharyngeal sphincter muscle EMG demonstrated severe abnormalities during voluntarily initiated swallows. The opening of the sphincter was delayed and/or the closure occurred prematurely, the total duration of opening was shortened and, at times, unexpected motor unit bursts appeared during this period. (iii) During voluntarily initiated swallows there was significant lack of co-ordination between the laryngeal elevator muscles and the cricopharyngeal sphincter muscle. These results point to two pathophysiological mechanisms that operate to cause dysphagia in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. (i) The triggering of the swallowing reflex for the voluntarily initiated swallow is delayed and eventually abolished, whereas the spontaneous reflexive swallows are preserved until the preterminal stage of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. (ii) The cricopharyngeal sphincter muscle of the upper oesophageal sphincter becomes hyper-reflexic and hypertonic. As a result, the laryngeal protective system and the bolus transport system of deglutition lose their co-ordination during voluntarily initiated swallowing. We conclude that these pathophysiological changes are related mainly to the progressive degeneration of the excitatory and inhibitory corticobulbar pyramidal fibres.

Clinical and electrophysiological evaluation of dysphagia in myasthenia gravis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate dysphagia at the oropharyngeal stage of swallowing and to determine the pathophysiological mechanisms of dysphagia in patients with myasthenia gravis.

METHODS

Fifteen patients with myasthenia gravis with dysphagia and 10 patients without dysphagia were investigated by a combined electrophysiological and mechanical method described previously. Laryngeal movements were detected by a piezoelectric transducer and the related submental EMG (SM-EMG) and sometimes the EMG of cricopharyngeal muscle of the upper esophageal sphincter (CP-EMG) were recorded during dry or wet swallowing. The results of these electrophysiological variables were compared with those of normal age matched control subjects.

RESULTS

In patients with myasthenia gravis with dysphagia, it was found that the time necessary for the larynx to remain in its superior position during swallowing and swallowing variability in successive swallows increased significantly compared with normal subjects and with patients with myasthenia gravis without dysphagia. The total duration of SM-EMG activity was also prolonged in both groups but more severely in the dysphagic patients. Electromyographic activity of the CP sphincter was found to be normal in the dysphagic patients investigated. All the patients with myasthenia gravis with dysphagia had pathological dysphagia limits (<20 ml water) whereas other patients except two, were within normal limits.

CONCLUSIONS

Because the electrophysiological variables related to oropharyngeal swallowing were prolonged even in patients with myasthenia gravis without dysphagia, it is concluded that the submental and laryngeal elevators are involved subclinically in myasthenia gravis and, because of compensating mechanisms, the patient may not be dysphagic. As the CP-EMG behaviour was found to be normal, a coordination disorder between normal CP sphincter muscle and the affected striated muscles of the laryngeal elevators may be one of the reasons for dysphagia in myasthenia gravis. This method also made it possible to investigate the myasthenic involvement in the laryngeal elevators that cannot be evaluated by other electrophysiological methods in myasthenia gravis.

Electrodiagnostic methods for neurogenic dysphagia

OBJECTIVE

Swallowing mechanisms and neurogenic dysphagia have not been systematically studied by the EMG technique. It is desirable to evaluate neurogenic dysphagia for diagnostic and possibly for therapeutic purposes using electrophysiological methods.

METHODS

The following methods were described: mechanical upward/downward movements of the larynx were detected using a piezoelectric sensor, while submental integrated EMG activity was recorded during dry and wet swallowing. The EMG activity of cricopharyngeal muscle of the upper oesophageal sphincter was also recorded in some normal subjects and patients. Piecemeal deglutition and the dysphagia limit were determined in all patients to detect dysphagia objectively. In this study 75 normal subjects and 177 neurological patients with various degrees of dysphagia were investigated.

RESULTS

Voluntarily triggered oropharyngeal swallowing was commonly pathological in the majority of patients, with or without overt dysphagia. The dysphagia limit appeared to be an objective measure of the degree of dysphagia in more than 90% of patients. Pathophysiological mechanisms were different in at least three groups of patients with neurogenic dysphagia. In the group of patients with muscular disorders, laryngeal elevators were involved while the CP-sphincter was intact. The second group included patients with the clinical signs of corticobulbar fibre involvement such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and pseudobulbar palsy. In these patients, there was incoordination between paretic laryngeal elevators and hyperreflexic CP-sphincter. In the third group (patients with Parkinson's disease), the swallowing reflex was delayed and prolonged.

CONCLUSIONS

EMG methods described in the present study are very useful for the diagnosis of neurogenic dysphagia, objectively and quickly. They are important to understand the physiological mechanisms for deglutition and its disorders.

Piecemeal deglutition and dysphagia limit in normal subjects and in patients with swallowing disorders

OBJECTIVE

Before the advanced evaluation of deglutition and selection of a treatment method, objective screening methods are necessary for patients with dysphagia. In this study a new electroclinical test was established to evaluate patients with dysphagia.

METHODS

This test is based on determining piecemeal deglutition; which is a physiological phenomenon occurring when a bolus of a large volume is divided into two or more parts which are swallowed successively. The combined electrophysiological and mechanical method used to record laryngeal movements detected by a piezoelectric transducer, and activities of the related submental integrated EMG (SM-EMG)-and sometimes the cricopharyngeal muscle of the upper oesophageal sphincter (CP-EMG)-were performed during swallowing. Thirty normal subjects and 66 patients with overt dysphagia of neurogenic origin were investigated after detailed clinical evaluation. Twenty patients with a potential risk of dysphagia, but who were normal clinically at the time of investigation, were also evaluated to determine the specificity of the test. All subjects were instructed to swallow doses of water, gradually increasing in quantity from 1 ml to 20 ml, and any recurrence of the signals related to swallowing within the eight seconds was accepted as a sign of dysphagia limit.

RESULTS

In normal subjects as well as in the patients without dysphagia, piecemeal deglutition was never seen with less than 20 ml water. This volume was therefore accepted as the lower limit of piecemeal deglutition. In patients with dysphagia, dysphagia limits were significantly lower than those of normal subjects.

CONCLUSION

The method is a highly specific and sensitive test for the objective evaluation of oropharyngeal dysphagia even in patients with suspected dysphagia of neurogenic origin. It can also be safely and simply applied in any EMG laboratory.

Dysphagia. Evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment

This article reviews the presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of the varied pathologic conditions that result in dysphagia. The description of difficulty swallowing by a patient should direct the physician to an orderly series of diagnostic tests of esophageal function to help determine the cause of dysphagia. Some conditions that cause dysphagia also are presented in this review.

Premature contraction of the cricopharyngeus: a new sign of gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

A cricopharyngeal bar seen on barium fluoroscopy has been shown to be related to the presence of gastroesophageal reflux (GER). We investigated premature contraction of the cricopharyngeus (PCC) muscle, which may be a precursor of a fixed cricopharyngeal bar, to assess its significance in GER.

METHODS

The prevalence of PCC on barium swallow was recorded in three groups: (1) 83 patients with non-cardiac chest pain who were investigated for possible GER; (2) 21 patients with severe GER undergoing fundoplication; and (3) 25 normal controls.

RESULTS

Group 1: PCC was observed in 42 of 77 with documented GER (54.5%), and in two of six patients without GER. Group 2: PCC was present in 11 of 21 fundoplication subjects. Group 3: PCC was seen in five of 25 normal controls. The incidence of PCC in patients with GER was statistically significantly higher than in normal subjects (p = 0.002). The sensitivity of the presence of PCC as a predictor of GER is only 0.54, but the specificity is 0.774, with a positive predictive value of 0.883.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that observing premature cricopharyngeal contraction during the first swallows of an upper gastrointestinal (GI) study should direct attention to the possibility of GER.

Repetitive contractions of the upper esophageal body and sphincter in achalasia

This report describes repetitive contractions in the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and the repetitive upper esophageal spontaneous contractions (RUESCs) of patients with achalasia and relates this activity to repetitive contractile activity (RCA) recorded in the more distal esophageal body, to intraesophageal pressure (IEP), and to lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure. Two hundred and sixteen consecutive esophageal motility studies from 156 achalasia patients with retrospectively assessed. RUESCs were found in 105 patients (67%) and 125 of 216 studies (58%). General features of the RUESC were (1) coincidence with simultaneous repetitive increases in pressure throughout the entire esophageal body; (2) amplitude of pressure increases tended to be higher in the proximal esophagus; (3) RUESC frequency was different than respiration, except for 6 cases where continuous, RUESC and RCA were synchronized with inspiration; and (4) RUESCs were positively associated with increased IEP, and with increased LES pressure (> 40 mmHg). RCA in the esophageal body was uncommon without RUESC. It is concluded that (1) RUESCs are common in achalasia and appear to be closely linked to contractile activity in the upper esophageal body; (2) the close relationship of RUESC and RCA in the esophageal body to increased IEP and elevated LES pressure suggests that esophageal tone is high in these subjects; and (3) these findings indicate a potential mechanisms for localization of some of the clinical symptoms to the retrosternal and suprasternal areas, for the inability to readily belch, and for the development of structural features such as a prominent cricopharyngeal bar.

Specializations of the human upper respiratory and upper digestive systems as seen through comparative and developmental anatomy

The human upper respiratory, or aerodigestive, tract serves as the crossroads of our breathing, swallowing and vocalizing pathways. Accordingly, developmental or evolutionary change in any of these functions will, of necessity, affect the others. Our studies have shown that the position in the neck of the mammalian larynx is a major factor in determining function in this region. Most mammals, such as our closest relatives the nonhuman primates, exhibit a larynx positioned high in the neck. This permits an intranarial larynx to be present and creates largely separate respiratory and digestive routes. While infant humans retain this basic mammalian pattern, developmental descent of the larynx considerably alters this configuration. Adult humans have, accordingly, lost separation of the respiratory and digestive routes, but have gained an increased supralaryngeal region of the pharynx which allows for the production of the varied sounds of human speech. How this region has changed during human evolution has been difficult to assess due to the absence of preserved soft-tissue structures. Our studies have shown that the relationship between basicranial shape and laryngeal position in living mammals can be a valuable guide to reconstruct the region in ancestral humans. Based on these findings we have examined the basicrania of fossil ancestors--from over two million years ago to near recent times--and have reconstructed the position of the larynx and pharyngeal region in these early forms. This has allowed us insight into how our ancestors may have breathed and swallowed, and when the anatomy necessary for human speech evolved.

Pharyngeal constrictor paresis: an indicator of neurologic disease?

Pharyngeal constrictor paresis (PHCP) is sometimes found in videoradiography of the swallowing act in patients complaining of dysphagia. Ten patients with PHCP and 10 dysphagic, age- and sex-matched controls with normal videoradiography were neurologically evaluated and examined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and brainstem in order to learn the pathogenetic process behind PHCP. The study revealed 8 PHCP patients and 1 dysphagic control with abnormal clinical neurological findings such as myopathy, cerebrovascular disease, or extrapyramidal disease. The neurological examination revealed considerable information of prognostic and therapeutic value in PHCP patients. The MRI was abnormal in 7 PHCP patients and 4 dysphagic controls. However, the findings in MRI were nonspecific but the examination was found to be valuable in selected cases. It is concluded that PHCP is an indicator of neurological disease and accordingly, such patients should be examined by a neurologist to establish the cause of the disease.

Cricopharyngeal function and dysfunction

The cricopharyngeus is a narrow band of muscle strategically placed between the pharynx and esophagus. Its normal function is vital to the efficient transfer of foodstuffs to the esophagus. Cine- and videoradiography are the major methods of studying the pharyngo-esophageal segment. More recently, refinements in manometric methods have complemented radiology, and have enabled us to achieve a better understanding of cricopharyngeal function in health and disease. Such an understanding of the physical forces necessary for normal bolus transfer, and the recognition of abnormal patterns of pharyngeal and cricopharyngeal motility, will hopefully lead us to a more rational approach to therapy in patients with pharyngeal dysphagia.

Clinical and demographic data in 75 patients with near-fatal choking episodes

The clinical background and circumstances of 75 patients who had survived a near-fatal choking episode, i.e., had undergone a Heimlich maneuver, oropharyngeal suctioning, or intubation, is reported. Sixty had choked on a solid bolus (often of a complex texture like sandwiches and chicken soup). Four patients had choked on mashed banana. In 30 patients neurologic disease (such as cerebrovascular disease, Parkinson disease, or dementia) was present. Choking occurred during breakfast (16 patients), lunch (21), dinner (26), and snacks (12). Twenty-five choked at home, 18 in nursing homes, 14 in hospitals, nine in restaurants, and nine in drinking establishments. Twelve were being fed at the time of choking. Fifty-eight of the individuals had oral, pharyngeal, or esophageal abnormalities on radiographic examination that could explain the choking episode. Fourteen patients who were able to vocalize during the choking episode had probably suffered from esophageal impaction. Our study indicates that elderly individuals and those with neurogenic dysphagia are at risk for choking. Dysphagia diet (semisolids) may actually contribute to the risk in these patients. Young adults may also be at risk during episodes of consumption of alcohol and snacks.

Oropharyngeal and esophageal interrelationships in patients with nonobstructive dysphagia

Normal swallowing requires the close functional coordination of the mouth, pharynx, and esophagus, and if one of these components becomes functionally impaired, it is likely that the others may be affected. Using videofluoroscopy and manometry in this study, we examined the esophageal phase of swallowing in 12 patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia (group A) and the oropharyngeal components of swallowing in 29 patients with esophageal motor dysfunction and nonobstructive dysphagia (group B). A wide range of esophageal function abnormalities was seen in the first group, including delayed esophageal body peristalsis, spontaneous or simultaneous (tertiary) contractions, esophageal body dilation, proximal bolus redirection, and poor lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. Manometrically, 92% of group A patients were classified as having nonspecific esophageal motility disorder (NSEMD). In a similar fashion, group B patients exhibited many oropharyngeal function abnormalities on videofluorography including disturbed lingual peristalsis, slowed pharyngeal transit time with poor constriction of pharyngeal muscles, and laryngeal vestibular and tracheal bolus penetration. Manometrically, group B patients were classified as having NSEMD, achalasia, diffuse esophageal spasm, nutcracker esophagus, scleroderma, and chronic intestinal pseudoobstruction. In conclusion, oropharyngeal function is significantly altered in patients with esophageal motility disorders and dysphagia, and esophageal motor dysfunction occurs in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. These changes may represent either a compensatory mechanism or concomitant involvement of the oropharynx or the esophagus by the underlying neuromotor disorder. We suggest that assessment by esophageal motility and videofluoroscopy of both the oropharyngeal and esophageal phases of swallowing may improve diagnosis and therapy in patients with nonobstructive dysphagia.

Oropharyngeal and esophageal function in scleroderma

Fifty-one patients with systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) underwent videofluoroscopy during barium swallow to evaluate the incidence of oropharyngeal deglutition abnormalities and to correlate the radiologic patterns of esophageal motility abnormalities with patients' clinical features. Thirteen patients (26%) showed swallowing dysfunction, (e.g., oral leakage, retention, penetration, mild or moderate aspiration, and upper esophageal sphincter incoordination). These dysfunctions were more severe in patients with prominent esophageal dysmotility. Normal esophageal motility was not associated with swallowing alterations. Patients with an oropharyngeal disorder had a higher incidence of pulmonary disease. The clinical picture of the above-mentioned 13 patients was more severe, based on the duration of Raynaud's phenomenon and duration of skin sclerosis. Patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon had no oral or esophageal abnormalities. The esophageal phase of swallowing was abnormal in 80% of the patients with scleroderma. Esophageal dysfunction, therefore, seems to be frequent in the early stages of the disease. However, patients with advanced or extensive disease may have normal esophageal function.

Prevalence of swallowing complaints and clinical findings among 50-79-year-old men and women in an urban population

To determine the prevalence of swallowing and esophageal complaints in the general population, 300 men and 300 women were asked to answer a mailed questionnaire. The participation rate was 92.5%. Complaints were reported by 35%. The most common complaints were symptoms associated with gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and globus sensation, both with a rate of occurrence of 20%. Obstruction of the bolus reported by 3% was the individual symptom that most frequently brought patients to the doctor. To validate the questionnaire and to study possible organic causes behind these symptoms, 46 persons with symptoms were invited to undergo further examination. Cineradiography of the pharynx revealed that 7 of 14 patients with symptoms of GER had abnormalities in the esophagus. Eleven of 55 patients with GER symptoms at least once a week underwent endoscopy. One case of erosive esophagitis and one case of gastric ulcer were diagnosed. Four of nine patients with obstructive symptoms had defective closure of the laryngeal vestibule shown by cineradiography. Endoscopy in four patients with obstructive symptoms revealed benign findings. Thus, an epidemiologic study of patients with swallowing symptoms documented a low incidence of serious organic disease.

Interpretation of intraluminal manometric measurements in terms of swallowing mechanics

A unified discussion of the mechanics of the swallowing process, and its interpretation through manometric measurements of intraluminal pressure, are presented in this paper. The goals of the discussions are to provide the reader with basic knowledge of pharyngeal, esophageal, and sphincter mechanics; to relate the mechanical processes to intraluminal pressure recordings; and to clarify the relationship between intraluminal pressure and esophageal muscle contractile behavior. The esophageal phase of bolus transport, in particular, is discussed in some detail due to the relatively simple geometry and the straightforward description of peristalsis and muscle mechanics in this region. Several important issues are emphasized in the discussion. For example, pressure variation within a static bolus is fundamentally different from that within a moving bolus. Manometric recordings must be interpreted accordingly. The importance of differentiating between "hydrodynamic pressure," which is pressure measured within a fluid bolus, and "contact pressure," which is the direct squeeze of the luminal wall on the manometric port in a region devoid of bolus fluid, is discussed in some detail. We argue that pressure "amplitude" does not, in principle, give any indication of the forces required to drive the fluid bolus forward. What should be sought is the variation of intrabolus pressure relative to the contact pressure, particularly during periods in which the contractile segment fails to obliterate the esophageal lumen. Examples of intraluminal pressure recording in the esophagus, using manometry and mathematical models, are presented to demonstrate both the possibilities and the difficulties of interpreting manometric recordings in the absence of concurrent radiographic imaging. We discover that in regions of nearly complete luminal closure, the pressure signature and bolus geometry are strongly coupled during peristaltic transport, providing the possibility that in these regions quantitative measures of muscle performance might be developed without the need for radiographic imaging. On the other hand, the ambiguity in the interpretation of manometric recordings that often accompanies dysphagic conditions suggests that as more sophisticated interpretations are sought, manometry concurrent with radiography will play a more prominent role in patient evaluation.

Radiographic techniques and efficacy in evaluating esophageal dysphagia

The radiographic examination of the esophagus to determine structural and/or functional causes of dysphagia is best performed with multiple techniques. These include full-column studies to produce distended films with or without the use of a solid bolus, mucosal relief films to identify mucosal defects such as esophagitis or the presence of varices, double-contrast films, and motion recording (fluoroscopy). The efficacy of each technique depends on the quality of the study and the specific disorder to be detected. Esophageal lesions producing dysphagia are classified into extrinsic structural lesions, intrinsic structural lesions, and esophageal motility disorders. Radiographic studies are the preferred screening techniques for patients with dysphagia. Although not as sensitive for the evaluation of mucosal lesions, radiographic studies are superior to endoscopy for the detection of abnormal motility, esophageal rings, and strictures.