Techniques of rectocele repair and their effects on bowel function

Laparoscopic or transanal repair of rectocele? Comparison of a reduction in rectocele size

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the reduction in rectocele size after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (LVR) with that after transanal repair (TAR).

METHODS

Forty-six patients with rectocele who underwent LVR and 45 patients with rectocele who received TAR between February 2012 and December 2022 were included. This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. All patients had clinical evidence of a symptomatic rectocele. Bowel function was evaluated using the constipation scoring system (CSS) and fecal incontinence severity index (FISI). Substantial symptom improvement was defined as at least a 50% reduction in the CSS or FISI scores. Evacuation proctography was performed before surgery and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Constipation was substantially improved in 40-70% of the LVR patients and 70-90% of the TAR patients over 5 years. Fecal incontinence was markedly improved in 60-90% of the LVR patients across 5 years and in 75% of the TAR patients at 1 year. Postoperative proctography showed a reduction in rectocele size in the LVR patients (30 [20-59] mm preoperatively vs. 11 [0-44] mm postoperatively, P < 0.0001) and TAR patients (33 [20-55] mm preoperatively vs. 8 [0-27] mm postoperatively, P < 0.0001). The reduction rate of rectocele size in the LVR patients was significantly lower than that in the TAR patients (63 [3-100] % vs. 79 [45-100] %, P = 0.047).

CONCLUSION

The reduction in rectocele size was lower in the patients who underwent LVR than in those who received TAR.

Horizontal versus vertical plication of the rectovaginal septum in transperineal repair of anterior rectocele: a pilot randomized clinical trial

AIM

Anterior rectocele is usually an asymptomatic condition in many women, yet it can be associated with obstructed defaecation syndrome (ODS). Transperineal repair of rectocele (TPR) has been followed by variable rates of improvement in ODS. The present pilot randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate the outcome of TPR with vertical plication (VP) of the rectovaginal septum compared to horizontal plication (HP).

METHODS

Adult women with anterior rectocele were recruited to the study and were randomly allocated to one of two equal groups. The first group underwent TPR with VP of the rectovaginal septum and the second group underwent TPR with HP. The main outcome measures were improvement in ODS, recurrence of rectocele, complications and dyspareunia.

RESULTS

The trial included 40 female patients with anterior rectocele. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the postoperative Wexner score. Complete cure and significant improvement in ODS symptoms were comparable after the two techniques. The reduction in rectocele size after HP was significantly greater than after VP (1.7 vs. 2.6, P < 0.0001). Significant improvement in dyspareunia was recorded after HP (P = 0.001) but not after VP (P = 0.1). There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to operating time, complications and recurrence.

CONCLUSION

VP and HP of the rectovaginal septum in TPR were associated with a comparable improvement in ODS symptoms and similar complication rates. HP was followed by a greater reduction in the rectocele size and greater improvement in dyspareunia than VP.

Posterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse: Suture-Based Repair

Pelvic organ prolapse is common in parous women, although few report symptoms. The incidence of posterior compartment prolapse, or rectocele, is less well-reported. Posterior vaginal wall prolapse is associated with pain, constipation, and splinting. Surgery is the mainstay of therapy for symptomatic rectoceles. Though several surgical techniques have been described, no clear indications for type of repair have emerged. This article reviews the management strategies and draws conclusions about suture-based and site-specific techniques.

Comparative Study Between Trans-perineal Repair With or Without Limited Internal Sphincterotomy in the Treatment of Type I Anterior Rectocele: a Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Two types of rectocele exist; type I is characterized by relatively high resting anal pressures, whereas type II has lower resting anal pressures with associated pelvic organ prolapse. We compared trans-perineal repair (TPR) of rectocele with or without limited internal sphincterotomy (LIS) in the treatment of type I anterior rectocele.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

Consecutive patients with anterior rectocele were evaluated for inclusion. Sixty-two female patients with type I anterior rectocele were randomized and equally allocated to receive TPR alone (group I) or TPR with LIS (group II). The primary outcome was the clinical improvement of constipation. Secondary outcomes were recurrence of rectocele, operative time, and postoperative complications including fecal incontinence (FI).

RESULTS

Clinical improvement of constipation and patients' satisfaction were significantly higher in group II at 1 year of follow-up (93.3 versus 70 %). Constipation scores significantly decreased in both groups postoperatively with more reduction being observed in group II (11.1 ± 2.1 in group I versus 8 ± 1.97 in group II). Significant reduction in the resting anal pressure was noticed in group II. Recurrence was recorded in three (10 %) patients of group I and one patient of group II. No significant differences between the two groups regarding the operative time and hospital stay were noted.

CONCLUSION

Adding LIS to TPR of type I rectocele achieved better clinical improvement than TPR alone. The only drawback of LIS was the development of a minor degree of FI, which was temporary in duration.

Consistently inconsistent, the posterior vaginal wall

Posterior vaginal wall prolapse is one of the most common prolapses encountered by gynecological surgeons. What appears to be a straightforward condition to diagnose and treat surgically for physicians has proven to be frustratingly unpredictable with regard to symptom relief for patients. Functional disorders such as dyssynergic defecation and constipation are often attributed to posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Little scientific evidence supports this assumption, emphasizing that structure and function are not synonymous when treating posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Rectoceles, enteroceles, sigmoidoceles, peritoneoceles, rectal and intraanal intussusception, rectal prolapse, and descending perineal syndrome are all conditions that have an impact on the posterior vaginal wall. All too often these different anatomic conditions are treated with the same surgical approach, addressing a posterior vaginal wall bulge with a traditional posterior colporrhaphy. Studies that examine the correlation between stage of posterior wall prolapse and patient symptoms have failed to reliably do so. Surgical outcomes measured by prolapse staging appear successful, yet patient expectations are often not met. As increasing attention is being placed on patient satisfaction outcomes concerning surgical treatments, this fact will need to be addressed. Surgeons will have to clearly communicate what can and what cannot be expected with surgical repair of posterior vaginal wall prolapse.

Morbidity and functional mid-term outcomes using Prolift pelvic floor repair systems

INTRODUCTION

We assess midterm morbidity and functional outcomes using the Prolift (Gynecare/Ethicon, Somerville, NJ) system and identify potential related risk factors. The Prolift mesh system to treat genital prolapse was introduced in 2005. It was withdrawn from the market in early 2013 after rising doubts about safety.

METHODS

Over a 7-year period, we retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 112 consecutive patients who underwent the Prolift procedure since 2006. Intraoperative and postoperative complications, anatomical and functional outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 49.5 months (range: 16-85). The mean age was 64.7 ± 10.9 years (range: 40-86). Of the 112 patients, 74 patients had stage 3 (66.1%) and 8 patients had stage 4 (7.14%) vaginal prolapse. Prolift surgery was performed for pro-lapse recurrence for 26 patients (23.2%). Total mesh was used in 32 patients (29%), an isolated anterior mesh in 57 patients (51%) and an isolated posterior mesh in 23 patients (21%). Concomitant surgical procedures were performed for 44 patients (39.3%). Overall, 72% (18/25) of the complications were managed medically. We reported a failure rate of 8% (n = 9) occurring after a median follow-up of 9.5 months (range: 1-45). Among the 64 patients who had preoperative sexual activity (57.1%), de novo dyspareunia occurred in 9 patients (16.07%). We extracted predictive factors concerning failure, complications and sexuality.

CONCLUSION

Despite its market withdrawal, the Prolift system was associated with good midterm anatomic outcomes and few severe complications. Long-term follow-up data are still lacking, but surgeons and patients may be reassured.

Comparison of Long-term Clinical Outcomes according to the Change in the Rectocele Depth between Transanal and Transvaginal Repairs for a Symptomatic Rectocele

Purpose

This study was aimed to compare the results of a transanal repair with those of a transvaginal levatorplasty and to determine the long-term clinical outcomes according to the change in the depth of the rectocele after the procedure.

Methods

Of 50 women who underwent a rectocele repair from March 2005 to February 2007, 26 women (group A) received a transanal repair, and 24 (group B) received a transvaginal repair with or without levatorplasty. At 12 months after the procedures, 45 (group A/B, 22/23 women) among the 50 women completed physiologic studies, including anal manometry and defecography, and clinical-outcome measurements. The variations of the clinical outcomes with changes in the depth of the rectocele were also evaluated in 42 women (group A/B, 20/22) at the median follow-up of 50 months.

Results

On the defecographic findings, the postoperative depth of the rectocele decreased significantly in both groups (group A vs. B, 1.91 ± 0.20 vs. 2.25 ± 0.46, P = 0.040). At 12 months after surgery, 17 women in each group (group A/B, 77/75%) reported improvement of their symptoms. However, only 11 and 13 women (group A/B, 55/59%) of groups A and B, respectively, maintained their improvement at the median follow-up of 50 months. Better results were reported in patients with a greater change in the depth of their rectocele (≥4 cm) after the procedure (P = 0.001)

Conclusion

In both procedures, clinical outcomes might become progressively worse as the length of the follow-up is increased.

[Rectocele repair with porcine dermal collagen implant associated with infracoccygeal sacropexy]

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate an infracoccygeal colpopexy procedure by tension-free synthetic tape for vaginal apical prolapse associated with a posterior mesh procedure using porcine dermal graft for rectocele repair.

METHODS

A retrospective study concerning 35 women. The surgical procedure included rectocele repair with porcine dermal collagen implant (porcine dermal matrix, native) associated with transgluteal infracoccygeal sacropexy using a polypropylene sling.

RESULTS

Median follow up was 48 months (42-54). A vaginal hysterectomy was associated in 43% and a cure of cystocele was associated in 63% of cases. No intra-operative complication was noted. The prevalence of dyschesia decreased from 25% (eight patients) preoperatively to 3% (one patient) postoperatively. No cases of de novo dyspareunia was noted. Five (14%) patients had a recurrent prolapse (two cases of rectocele stage 2, one case of grade 3 rectocele associated with a cystocele, a case of uterine prolapse associated with cystocele and one case of recurrent isolated uterine prolapse). Among them, three patients (9%) required a re-intervention for prolapse recurrence. No vaginal mesh exposure was observed. Perineal pain was reported by 12 (33%) patients at one month follow-up, but no patient complained with perineal pain one year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Infracoccygeal sacropexy associated with rectocele repair using porcine dermal collagen implant was associated with satisfactory results at medium term follow-up.

Treatment of obstructed defecation

Obstructed defecation is a common problem that adversely affects the quality of life for many patients. Known causes of obstructed defecation include pelvic dyssynergy, rectocele, rectal intussusception, enterocele, pelvic organ prolapse, and overt rectal prolapse. Management of this condition requires an understanding of urinary, defecatory, and sexual function to achieve an optimal outcome. The goal of surgical treatment is to restore the various pelvic organs to their appropriate anatomic positions. However, there is a poor correlation between anatomic and functional results. As the pelvis contains many structures, a pelvic support or function defect frequently affects other pelvic organs. Optimal outcomes can only be achieved by selecting appropriate treatment modalities that address all of the components of a patient's problem.

Rectocele

Rectoceles are common and involve a herniation of the rectum into the posterior vaginal wall that results in a vaginal bulge. Women with rectoceles generally complain of perineal and vaginal pressure, obstructive defecation, constipation, or the need to splint or digitally reduce the vagina to effectuate a bowel movement. Rectoceles are associated with age and parturition and arise from either a tear or stretching of the rectovaginal fascia, and can be repaired via a vaginal, anal, or perineal approach. Although the rate of successful anatomic repair is high, reports of functional outcome are more variable.

Outcomes after the repair of rectoceles with transperineal insertion of a bioprosthetic graft

PURPOSE

This study was performed to determine the early outcomes with the use of bioprosthetic grafts for the management of rectoceles and to compare them to those achieved with transanal techniques.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed for patients treated for a rectocele. Data collected included age, technique of repair, complications, and functional outcomes. Defecatory function was determined using the Birmingham Bowel and Urinary Symptoms Questionnaire, a validated instrument for the measurement of bowel symptoms. The questionnaire was administered preoperatively and at 12 weeks and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

In this series, 88 women underwent a transanal repair, compared to 32 women who had their rectocele managed with a bioprosthetic graft. After 1 year of follow-up, patients whose rectocele was repaired using a bioprosthetic had significantly fewer complications with comparable functional results between the 2 techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that transperineal, bioprosthetic repair of rectoceles is associated with similar functional results but fewer complications when compared to transanal techniques during the early postoperative period. Randomized studies with longer-term follow-up will be required before the role of bioprosthetic repair of rectoceles can be determined.

Sacrocolpopexy without concomitant posterior repair improves posterior compartment defects

The aim of this study is to determine posterior compartment topography 1-year after sacrocolpopexy (SC). Women who had SC without concomitant anterior or posterior repairs for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) were included. Vaginal topography was assessed at baseline and 1-year postoperatively using POP quantification (POPQ). At baseline, 24% had stage IV POP, 68% stage III, and 8% stage II. One year after surgery, 75% had stage 0/I POP, 24% stage II, and 1% stage III. 112 (75%) were objectively cured (stage 0 or I POP). Anterior compartment was the most common site of POP persistence or recurrence (Ba ≥ stage II in 23 women) followed by posterior compartment (Bp ≥ stage II in 12 women) and apex (C ≥ stage II in 2 women). In 1-year follow-up, SC without concomitant posterior repair restores posterior vaginal topography in the majority of women with undergoing SC.

Functional disorders: rectocele

The baseline prevalence of rectocele is not well defined as many women are asymptomatic and do not seek medical help. Gynecologists tend to perform posterior wall repairs more commonly than colorectal surgeons because they also address patients with vaginal symptoms in addition to those with defecatory dysfunction. Overall, surgical correction success rates for rectocele correction are quite high when using a vaginal approach. Vaginal dissection, as opposed to transrectal or transperineal approaches, results in better visualization and access to the endopelvic fascia and levator musculature, allowing for more firm anatomic correction. In addition, the maintenance of rectal mucosal integrity may reduce the risk of postoperative complications such as infection and fistula formation. With the rapidly growing popularity of synthetic and biologic implant kits in the field of pelvic reconstruction, outcomes data reporting is increasing and allowing surgeons to better understand the effect of various surgical techniques on vaginal, sexual, and defecatory symptoms.

Biocompatible properties of surgical mesh using an animal model

AIM

To study the biocompatibility of surgical meshes for use in pelvic reconstructive surgery using an animal model.

METHODS

Eight different types of mesh: Atrium, Dexon, Gynemesh, IVS tape, Prolene, SPARC tape, TVT tape and Vypro II, were implanted into the abdominal walls of rats for 3 months' duration. Explanted meshes were assessed, using light microscopy, for parameters of rejection and incorporation.

RESULTS

Type 1 (Atrium, Gynemesh, Prolene, SPARC and TVT) and type 3 (Vypro II, Dexon and IVS) meshes demonstrated different biocompatible properties. Inflammatory cellular response and fibrosis at the interface of mesh and host tissue was most marked with Vypro II and IVS. All type 1 meshes displayed similar cellular responses despite markedly different mesh architecture.

CONCLUSIONS

The inflammatory response and fibrous reaction in the non-absorbable type 3 meshes tested (IVS and Vypro II) was more marked than the type 1 meshes. The increased inflammatory and fibrotic response may be because of the multifilamentous polypropylene components of these meshes. Material and filament composition of mesh is the main factor in determining cellular response.

A novel technique for rectocele repair in elderly women

We have developed a transvaginal technique for rectocele repair which we believe to be particularly suitable for older woman. A transverse incision was made in the mucocutaneous border of the vaginal introitus. The rectal wall was separated from the rectovaginal septum. The vaginal wall was divided in the middle. The first flap was sewn to the second and this onto the first. This intervention permits the contemporary correction of other pathologies frequently found in older women, such as cystocele and prolapse of the uterus. Twenty-two elderly women underwent operations using this technique; the mean follow-up period was 48 months (range, 24-84 months). The need to assist evacuation digitally disappeared in all patients.

Persistent symptoms of functional outlet obstruction after rectocele repair

BACKGROUND

Rectocele is frequently associated with constipation, but it is not known whether a causal relationship exists.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of rectocele repair on symptoms of constipation.

METHOD

Thirty-five women (28-79 years) consecutively operated for rectocele repair (11 transanal approach and 24 transperineal) were included in the prospective study. Using a structured questionnaire, the following criteria for constipation were evaluated: (a) straining, (b) sensation of anal blockage, (c) sensation of incomplete evacuation, (d) manual manoeuvres to facilitate defecation, (e) stool consistency and (f) stool frequency. The evaluation was performed before and 1 year after rectocele repair.

RESULTS

Before the operation all patients had two or more constipation criteria, including sensation of anal blockage. One year after the operation, the incidence of all symptoms significantly improved (from 3.9 +/- 0.2 to 1.9 +/- 0.3; P < 0.01). However, in 18 patients two or more criteria of constipation persisted, two patients presented one criterion, and only 15 patients became asymptomatic. Neither parity nor the type of surgical approach (endorectal vs transperineal) was related to the response to treatment. In eight patients who had a previous hysterectomy the result was significantly worse.

CONCLUSION

In a considerable proportion of patients, constipation persists after rectocele repair, suggesting that these symptoms are related to an underlying dysfunction.

Rectocele Repair Using Biomaterial Augmentation: Current Documentation and Clinical Experience

Although the etiology of rectocele remains debated, surgical innovations are currently promoted to improve anatomic outcome while avoiding dyspareunia and alleviating rectal emptying difficulties following rectocele surgery. Use of biomaterials in rectocele repair has become widespread in a short time, but the clinical documentation of their effectiveness and complications is limited. Medline and the Cochrane database were searched electronically from 1964 to May 2005 using the Pubmed and Ovid search engines. All English language publications including any of the search terms "rectocele," "implant," "mesh," "biomaterial," "prolapse," "synthetical," "pelvic floor," "biological," and "compatibility" were reviewed. This review outlines the basic principles for use of biomaterials in pelvic reconstructive surgery and provides a condensation of peer-reviewed articles describing clinical use of biomaterials in rectocele surgery. Historical and new concepts in rectocele surgery are discussed. Factors of importance for human in vivo biomaterial compatibility are presented together with current knowledge from clinical studies. Potential risks and problems associated with the use of biomaterials in rectocele and pelvic reconstructive surgery in general are described. Although use of biomaterials in rectocele and other pelvic organ prolapse surgery offers exciting possibilities, it raises treatment costs and may be associated with unknown and potentially severe complications at short and long term. Clinical benefits are currently unknown and need to be proven in clinical studies.

TARGET AUDIENCE

Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians

TARGET AUDIENCE

After completion of this article, the reader should be able to explain that the objective of surgical treatment is to improve anatomic outcome and alleviate rectal emptying difficulties, describe the efficacy of biomaterials in rectocele repair, and summarize the potential risks and problems associated with use of biomaterials in rectocele and pelvic reconstructive surgery.

The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity to symptoms and quality of life

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relationship and location of vaginal prolapse severity to symptoms and quality of life.

DESIGN

A prospective observational study.

SETTING

Urogynaecology Unit, Imperial College, St Mary's Hospital, London.

POPULATION

Women with and without symptoms of vaginal prolapse.

METHODS

All women completed a validated Prolapse Quality of Life (P-QOL) questionnaire. This included a urinary, bowel and sexual symptom questionnaire. All women were examined using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q). POP-Q scores in those with and without prolapse symptoms were compared. Urinary and bowel symptoms and sexual function were compared and related to prolapse severity and location.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

POP-Q scores, P-QOL scores, urinary and bowel symptoms and sexual function.

RESULTS

Three hundred and fifty-five women were recruited-233 symptomatic and 122 asymptomatic of prolapse. The median P-QOL domain scores ranged between 42-100 in symptomatic women and 0-25 in those who were asymptomatic. The stage of prolapse was significantly higher in those symptomatic of prolapse (P < 0.001) except for perineal body (PB) measurement. Urinary symptoms were not correlated with uterovaginal prolapse severity whereas bowel symptoms were strongly associated with posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Cervical descent was found to have a relationship with sexual dysfunction symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Women who present with symptoms specific to pelvic organ prolapse demonstrate greater degrees of pelvic relaxation than women who present without symptoms. Prolapse severity and quality of life scores are significantly different in those women symptomatic of prolapse. There was a stronger relationship between posterior prolapse and bowel symptoms than anterior prolapse and urinary symptoms. Sexual dysfunction was related to cervical descent.

Functional and anatomic outcome after transvaginal rectocele repair using collagen mesh: a prospective study

PURPOSE

This study was designed to evaluate rectocele repair using collagen mesh.

METHODS

32 female patients underwent surgical repair using collagen mesh. Outcome was assessed in 29 patients and preoperative assessment included standardized questionnaire, clinical examination, and defecography. At the six-month follow-up, patients answered a standardized questionnaire and underwent clinical examination. At the 12-month follow-up, patients answered a standardized questionnaire, underwent clinical examination, and defecography.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, 26 patients had a Stage II and 3 patients had a Stage III rectocele. At the 6-month follow-up, five patients had rectocele > or = Stage II (P < 0.001) and at the 12-month follow-up, seven patients had rectocele > or = Stage II (P < 0.001) at clinical examination. At the preoperative defecography, all patients presented a rectocele. At the 12-month defecography, 14 patients had no rectocele (P < 0.001) and 15 had a rectocele. At the six-month follow-up, there was a significant decrease in rectal emptying difficulties, need of digital support of the posterior vaginal wall at defecation, and defecation frequency. At the 12-month follow-up, symptom improvement remained, but was less pronounced.

CONCLUSIONS

Rectocele repair using collagen mesh improved anatomic support, but there is a substantial risk for recurrence with unsatisfactory anatomic and functional outcome one year after surgery. Rectocele repair using mesh was not associated with an increased risk of dyspareunia. Rectocele repair using biomaterial mesh reinforcement needs further evaluation before adopted into clinical practice.

Treatment of obstructed defecation

Obstructed defecation is a common problem that adversely affects the quality of life for many patients. Known causes of obstructed defecation include pelvic dyssynergy, rectocele, rectal intussusception, enterocele, pelvic organ prolapse, and overt rectal prolapse. Management of this condition requires an understanding of urinary, defecatory, and sexual function to achieve optimal outcomes. The goal of surgical treatment is to restore the various pelvic organs to their appropriate anatomic positions. However, there is a poor correlation between anatomic and functional results. It must be remembered that the pelvis contains many structures and that defects of pelvic support or function frequently affect other pelvic organs. Optimal outcomes can be achieved only by selecting appropriate treatment modalities that address all of the components of an individual patient's problem.

Laparoscopic or transanal repair of rectocele? A retrospective matched cohort study

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to analyze the functional and physiologic outcome of patients undergoing laparoscopic rectocele repair compared to a matched cohort undergoing transanal repair.

METHODS

Forty patients with a rectocele who had undergone laparoscopic pelvic floor repair by a laparoscopic gynecologist were matched for age and rectocele size with 40 patients who had undergone a transanal repair by a colorectal surgeon. All patients had clinical evidence of a symptomatic rectocele. All patients were assessed postoperatively with a quality of life (SF-36) score, a modified St. Mark's continence score, a urinary dysfunction score, a Watt's sexual dysfunction score, and a linear analog patient satisfaction score. Fifteen patients in each group had also undergone preoperative and postoperative anal manometry.

RESULTS

At 44 months median follow-up, the transanal approach resulted in significantly more patients reporting bowel symptom alleviation (P < 0.002) and higher patient satisfaction (P < 0.003). The bowel symptom improvement was also sustained over a significantly longer period (P < 0.03). Only 11 patients (28 percent) in the laparoscopic group reported more than 50 percent improvement in their bowel symptoms compared to 25 patients (63 percent) in the transanal group. On univariate analysis of 50 percent bowel symptom improvement, a larger rectocele (P < 0.009), transanal repair (P < 0.02), and presenting with obstructive defecation rather than fecal incontinence (P < 0.03) were statistically significant. Rectocele size (P < 0.012) and treatment cohort (P < 0.006) remained significant on multivariate analysis. Postoperatively, bowel symptom alleviation correlated with patient satisfaction in both groups (P < 0.015). Although not statistically significant, five patients (13 percent) in the transanal group developed postoperative fecal incontinence, which was associated with a low maximum anal resting pressure preoperatively that was further diminished postoperatively (P > 0.06). Only one patient (3 percent) in the laparoscopic group reported a decline in fecal continence, but four patients (10 percent) reported worsening of their symptoms of obstructed defecation. Postoperative dyspareunia was reported by 24 patients in total (30 percent), with significantly more in the transanal group (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The transanal repair results in a statistically greater alleviation of bowel symptoms and greater patient satisfaction scores. However, this approach may have a greater degree of functional co-morbidity than the laparoscopic rectocele repair.

Functional and physiological outcome following transanal repair of rectocele

BACKGROUND

Rectoceles are traditionally repaired transvaginally and sexual dysfunction can be a significant complication. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional and physiological outcome following transanal repair of rectoceles.

METHODS

Forty-five patients of mean age 57.1 (range 34-78) years with a symptomatic anterior rectocele, selected by contrast retention greater than 15 per cent on isotope defaecography, underwent transanal repair of rectocele. Preoperative and postoperative symptoms were assessed by means of a questionnaire. A proportion of patients underwent anorectal physiology and isotope defaecography before and after surgery.

RESULTS

Median(range) follow-up was 24 (2-50) months. One patient developed a wound infection after surgery. Thirty-five patients reported an excellent, good or fair result, with seven reporting a moderate and three a poor result. There was a reduction in incomplete evacuation (P < 0.001) confirmed by isotope defaecography (mean(s.d.) rectal emptying before surgery 57(14) per cent versus 76(9) per cent after surgery; P = 0.020), and a reduction in vaginal (P < 0.001) and perineal (P = 0.004) digitation. Symptomatic feeling of prolapse (vaginal bulging) was significantly improved (P < 0.001). There was no increase in incontinence (P = 0.688). Resting and squeeze anal canal pressures were unchanged after operation. Surgery did not result in sexual dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

Transanal repair of rectocele is a safe alternative to posterior colporrhaphy. It provides improvement in symptoms, reflected by anatomical improvement with minimal complications and no increase in dyspareunia.

Transanal or vaginal approach to rectocele repair: a prospective, randomized pilot study

PURPOSE

This study was designed to compare outcomes of transanal and vaginal techniques for rectocele repair.

METHODS

Thirty females with symptomatic rectocele were enrolled in a prospective, randomized study. Fifteen underwent transanal rectoceleplasty, the other 15 underwent vaginal posterior colporrhaphy. Patients were assessed by clinical interview and examination, defecography, colon transit study, and anorectal manometry before randomization and 12 months postoperatively. Patients with compromised anal sphincter function or other symptomatic prolapse were excluded.

RESULTS

The study groups were comparable in terms of demographic factors and rectocelerelated symptoms and signs. Eleven (73 percent) patients in the vaginal group and 10 (66 percent) in the transanal group digitally assisted rectal emptying preoperatively. The mean depth of the rectocele was 6.0 +/- 1.6 cm vs. 5.6 +/- 1.8 cm (P = 0.53) in the respective groups. At follow-up, 14 (93 percent) patients in the vaginal group and 11 (73 percent) in the transanal group reported improvement in symptoms (P = 0.08). Need to digitally assist rectal emptying decreased significantly in both groups, to one (7 percent) for the vaginal group and four (27 percent) for the transanal group (P = 0.17 between groups). The respective recurrence rates of rectocele were one (7 percent) vs. six (40 percent) (P = 0.04), and enterocele rates were zero vs. four (P = 0.05). In the vaginal group defecography showed a significant decrease in rectocele depth whereas in the transanal group the difference did not reach statistical significance. None of the patients reported de novo dyspareunia, but 27 percent reported improvement.

CONCLUSION

Patients' symptoms were significantly alleviated by both operative techniques. The transanal technique was associated with more clinically diagnosed recurrences of rectocele and/or enterocele. Adverse effects on sexual life were avoided by use of both techniques.

Traitement des rectocèles et des élytrocèles par voie abdominale : apport de la laparoscopie

AIM OF THE STUDY

To report the results of abdominal promontory rectopexy and douglassectomy in the management of rectocele and enterocele.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1992 and 2002, 72 patients were operated by one colorectal surgeon. Laparotomy was used in 37 cases between 1992 and 2001 and the laparoscopic approach in 35 cases from 1995 to 2002. Promontory rectal fixation required only one mesh secured between the anterolateral right side of the rectum and the lumbosacral ligament. The same mesh was used to fix the vagina or the cervix. Combined therapeutic or prophylactic urinary interventions are frequent in the series.

RESULTS

The follow-up was more than one year in 63 patients with a mean value of 58 months with no patient lost. Recurrence of posterior vaginal prolapse was noted in only two cases. Dyschesia and urinary incontinence were improved respectively in 80 and 70% of the cases and a significant improvement in anal incontinence was observed in 95% of the patients.

CONCLUSION

The abdominal way allows a suitable treatment in patients with advanced stage rectocele and enterocele and evidence of pelvic organ prolapse. The laparoscopic approach is superior in terms of morbidity and functional results.

Rectocele: pathogenesis and surgical management

BACKGROUND

Rectocele is a common finding in patients with intractable evacuatory disorders. Although much rectocele surgery is conducted by gynecologists en passant with other forms of vaginal surgery, many reports lack appreciation of the importance of coincident anorectal symptoms, and do not report functional and clinical outcome data. The pathogenesis of rectocele is still controversial, as is the embryological and anatomical importance of the rectovaginal septum as well as recognizable defects in its integrity and its relevance in formal repair when rectocele is operated upon as the principal condition in patients with intractable evacuatory difficulty.

DISCUSSION

The investigation and surgical management of rectocele is controversial given the relatively small numbers of operated patients in any single specialist unit and the relative lack of prospective data concerning functional outcome in operated cases. The imaging of rectocele patients is currently in a state of change, and the newer diagnostic modalities including dynamic magnetic resonance imaging frequently display a multiplicity of pelvic floor disorders. When surgery is indicated, coloproctologists most commonly utilize an endorectal defect-specific repair, but there are few controlled randomized data regarding outcome and response criteria of specific symptoms with particular surgical approaches. A Medline-based literature search was conducted for this review to assess the clinical results of defect-specific rectocele repairs using the endorectal, transvaginal, transperineal, or combined approaches. Only the studies are included that report both pre- and postoperative symptoms including constipation, evacuatory difficulty, pelvic pain, the impression of a pelvic mass, fecal incontinence, dyspareunia or the need for assisted digitation to aid defecation.

CONCLUSION

The history of rectocele repair, its clinical and diagnostic features and the advantages, disadvantages and indications for the different surgical techniques are presented in this review. Suggested diagnostic and surgical therapeutic algorithms for management have been included. It is recommended that a multicenter controlled randomized trial comparing surgical approaches for symptomatic evacuatory dysfunction where rectocele is the principal abnormality should be conducted.

Dynamic evaluation of female pelvic organ prolapse by extended proctography

More accurate preoperative assessment by DCP or MR imaging hopefully should reduce the incidence of operative failure. These techniques help the surgeon to plan the different components of pelvic reconstructive surgery and, importantly, whether a transvaginal or transabdominal approach will be required. The current trend is toward the transabdominal route. Available evidence suggests that the reoperative rate is halved when the abdominal approach is employed. Large enteroceles and marked vaginal vault prolapse, in particular, are much more amenable to correction by transabdominal surgery. It should be recognized that enteroceles and sigmoidoceles often escape preoperative detection unless radiologic evaluation is performed. Global assessment of pelvic organ prolapse is optimized by ensuring that competing organs are effectively emptied by virtue of a triphasic approach. As expressed succinctly by Halligan, "the global pelvic floor specialist has arrived, and his closest ally is the radiologist".

How could management of rectoceles be optimized?

A posterior vaginal wall prolapse, also known as a rectocele, is a common condition and is an outpouching of the posterior vaginal wall and anterior rectal wall into the lumen of the vagina.1-5 Although more common in parous women, rectoceles of over 1 cm in size have been demonstrated in over 40% of nulliparous women. As rectoceles may be asymptomatic, their true prevalence is not clear. Many women with rectoceles present to their gynaecologist who may not ascertain any anorectal symptoms or perform a rectal examination. Conversely, colorectal surgeons often disregard a vaginal examination.6 Conventionally, gynaecologists have managed rectoceles, but increasingly colorectal surgeons are involved because of the prevalence of anorectal symptoms. There are many surgical techniques for the management of a symptomatic rectocele. There is, however, little data to suggest which is the most effective technique, or whether specific techniques are more appropriate in certain circumstances.7

Posterior vaginal wall defects and their relation to measures of pelvic floor neuromuscular function and posterior compartment symptoms

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe the pelvic floor neuromuscular function and posterior compartment symptoms in patients with posterior vaginal wall prolapse.

STUDY DESIGN

Two hundred twenty-seven women who were referred to a urogynecology and urology clinic were enrolled prospectively. Each patient completed a health history questionnaire and standardized physical examination that specifically graded uterovaginal prolapse according to the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine women had a pelvic organ prolapse quantification system point (most dependent portion of the posterior vaginal wall during straining as measured from the hymeneal ring) of < or =-1. Older age, a history of hysterectomy, a genital hiatus of >3 cm (48% vs 24%; P =.002), and perineal descent of > or =2 cm (14% vs 5%; P =.042) were significantly more common in women with posterior vaginal prolapse. When women with posterior prolapse and symptomatic complaints were compared with asymptomatic women with prolapse, a perineal descent of > or =2 cm (21% vs 0%; P =.004) was significantly more common in the symptomatic group.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic floor neuromuscular function should be related to posterior vaginal prolapse and symptoms; however, only perineal descent appears associated strongly with both symptoms and prolapse in this population.

Analysis of patients with poor outcome of rectocele repair

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to analyze the prognostic value of clinical data and physiologic tests in patients undergoing rectocele repair for obstructed defecation.

METHODS

Between 1988 and 1996, 89 consecutive female patients with obstructed defecation caused by a rectocele were enrolled in the study. Median age at time of presentation was 55 (range, 35-81) years. All patients underwent a combined transvaginal and transanal rectocele repair. End evaluation to assess long-term results was performed by an independent observer after a median duration of follow up of 52 (range, 12-92) months. The presence of the following five symptoms was evaluated: prolonged and unsuccessful straining at stool, feelings of incomplete evacuation, manual assistance during defecation, false urge to defecate, and a stool frequency of less than three times per week. When none or just one of these symptoms was present, outcome of rectocele repair was considered successful. The outcome was considered as a failure when two or more of these symptoms were recorded. Furthermore, all patients were asked to score the outcome of their operations as excellent, good, moderate, or poor. Clinical data and the results of physiologic tests obtained in patients with a poor outcome of surgery were compared with those obtained in patients with a successful outcome.

RESULTS

Objective outcome of rectocele repair, based on the presence of symptoms, was found to be successful in 63 (71 percent) patients. Sixty-one patients considered outcome of surgery excellent or good (69 percent). Graded subjective outcomes between the two groups showed significantly better grades in cases of success. Duration of symptoms, number of symptoms, age, parity, and previous hysterectomy had no influence on the final outcome of surgery. Defecographic parameters, such as size of the rectocele, barium trapping in the rectocele, poor rectal evacuation, or intussusception, had no prognostic value. Signs of anismus based on defecography, electromyography, and balloon-expulsion studies did not influence outcome of surgery. The presence of symptoms such as defecation frequency, manual assistance, severe straining, false urge to defecate, or feelings of incomplete evacuation had no impact on the outcome. However, in patients without a daily urge to defecate or with a stool frequency of less than once per week, results of rectocele repair were significantly worse than in patients with a daily urge to defecate or a defecation frequency of more than once per week or both. In 14 of 26 patients with a poor outcome, colonic transit studies were performed. A delayed passage was observed throughout the entire colon in seven patients, in the left part of the colon and the rectosigmoid colon in four patients, and in the rectosigmoid colon in one patient. In two patients colonic transit was normal.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined transvaginal and transanal rectocele repair is beneficial for the majority of patients with obstructed defecation. In patients without a daily urge to defecate or a stool frequency of less than once per week, indicating colonic malfunctioning, the outcome of rectocele repair seems to be poor.

The anatomic and functional outcomes of defect-specific rectocele repairs

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to evaluate the anatomic, functional, and quality-of-life effects of site-specific posterior colporrhaphy in the surgical management of rectocele.

STUDY DESIGN

In a retrospective observational study 125 patients were studied who had undergone site-specific posterior colporrhaphy between 1995 and 1996, either alone or in conjunction with other pelvic procedures. Physical examination was performed >/=6 months after the operation to assess the anatomic success of the repair. Standardized questionnaires were used to assess quality of life, sexual function, and bowel function.

RESULTS

Surgical correction was found at follow-up examination to have been achieved in 82% of eligible patients (73/89). All daily aspects of living improved significantly (P <.05), including ability to do housework (56% improvement or cure), travel (58% improvement or cure), and social activities (60% improvement or cure). Emotional well-being also significantly improved after the operation, as measured by thoughts of embarrassment (57% improvement or cure) or frustration (71% improvement or cure). Sexual function was not affected; however, reports of dyspareunia significantly (P <.04) improved or were cured after the operation in 73% of patients (19/26), worsened in 19% of patients (5/26), and arose de novo in 3 patients. Results showed no other significant differences in vaginal dryness, orgasm ability, sexual desire, sexual frequency, or sexual satisfaction. Bowel symptoms were assessed subjectively and were noted to have significantly improved (P <.008) after the operation. The following improvement or cure rates were obtained: stooling difficulties, 55%; pelvic pain or pressure, 73%; vaginal mass, 74%; and splinting, 65%.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that defect-specific posterior colporrhaphy is equal to or superior to traditional posterior colporrhaphy. This type of repair provides durable anatomic support and is successful in restoring bowel function. It does not detrimentally affect sexual function, may aid in the resumption of sexual activity, and significantly improves quality of life and social aspects of daily living.