Genetic models in brain and behavior research, Part I

Comparison of the behavioural pharmacology of the Lister-Hooded with 2 commonly utilised albino rat strains

The use of animal models (particularly rats) in research for developing drugs for central nervous system diseases is well validated. However a range of strains are often utilised in these models. The Lister-Hooded (LH) strain is beginning to be increasingly used in preclinical investigations. Thus, the objective of the present study was to investigate the comparative behavioural pharmacology of this strain, with the two most widely used rat strains, namely the Sprague-Dawley (SD), and Wistar (W) strains. The tests used were the forced swim test (FST) for antidepressants, the amphetamine-locomotor activity test for antipsychotics, the elevated plus maze (EPM) for anxiolytics, as well as tests of general locomotor activity using home cage monitoring (HCM) and the open field test. Continuous HCM revealed a significantly higher daily activity and lower nocturnal activity for LH compared to the other strains; there were no strain-related differences in the open field test. In the FST, there were no strain differences in immobility time and a similar magnitude of desipramine-induced reduction in immobility across strains. In the locomotor activity test, control LH rats showed significantly higher activity whilst significant amphetamine-induced hyperactivity was seen only with the LH and W strains. In the EPM, control LH rats had a significantly larger percentage of open arm entries, whilst only the SD strain displayed a significant diazepam-induced increase in this parameter. These findings suggest that strain variation can cause markedly different results in behavioural pharmacological tests where locomotor activity plays a significant role, and should be taken into account when selecting a strain for evaluating the behavioural effects of psychotropic drugs. Such differences in locomotor activity in the LH strain could be accounted for by an altered diurnal pattern in this strain.

What can genetic models tell us about behavioral plasticity?

Biological diversity and learning have played an essential interactive role in the evolution of species, as intra-specific individual differences have exerted a buffering effect towards environmental changes, and learning ability per se has allowed their maintenance. By exploiting biological diversity individuals with defective learning and memory have been produced that allow the study of the neural substrates of encoding mechanisms, as has been done in studies from Drosophila to rodents. Various aspects of this neurogenetic approach are reviewed and pitfalls are indicated. It is clear that genetic models need to be implemented by an integrated multidisciplinary top-down approach based on behavioral, electrophysiological, histochemical, immunocytochemical and neurochemical techniques. Examples are presented from some animal models that illustrate how a systems level analysis of the neural substrates of information processing can be carried out using such an integrated scheme.

Genetic and environmental influences on reactive and spontaneous locomotor activities in rats

Paired groups of rats (derived from divergent, selective breeding or living in divergent environmental conditions) were compared with regard to locomotor activities. Intrapair differences were found to vary non-systematically, depending upon whether the rats were initially exposed to a test-environment with or without a slight environmental modification (reactive activities), or were allowed to habituate extensively to the environment (spontaneous activity). Since the behavioral patterns were found to represent distinct entities, this pointed to the necessity of differentiating clearly between spontaneous and reactive activities and indicated, once again, that both genetic and environmental influences are important in these behaviors and must be taken into account. Accepting and controlling for these variables makes it possible to use the factor of individual differences in laboratory animal behavior to advantage.

Genetic determinants of individual differences in avoidance learning: behavioral and endocrine characteristics

Bidirectional genetic selection for good and poor active avoidance learning in a shuttle box has been carried out in three independent laboratories using remarkably similar discrete-trial training procedures. The resulting strains are known as the Roman High and Low Avoidance (RHA and RLA), the Syracuse High and Low Avoidance (SHA and SLA) and the Australian High and Low Avoidance (AHA and ALA) strains, respectively. An additional unidirectionally selected strain, known as the Tokai High Avoider (THA) strain was developed in Japan using a free-operant Sidman avoidance procedure in a Skinner box. This paper reviews the selection of the Syracuse strains, enumerates the various behavioral and endocrine characteristics of the strains, and compares them to the other similarly selected strains. The behavioral work suggests that genetic selection from diverse breeding stocks has resulted in common characteristics that differentiate the strains in the emotional, not learning, domain. The endocrine data, however, are somewhat at odds. The Syracuse strains differentiate one way with respect to endocrine function, and the Roman strains differentiate in the opposite way. We suggest, therefore, that the endocrine correlates are not tightly linked to the avoidance genotype. Genetic analysis of all of the selected strains for both the avoidance phenotype and the endocrine correlates will be needed to test this hypothesis.