A species comparison of the histamine H2-receptor on mast cells and basophils

Histamine receptors and COVID-19

OBJECTIVE

Reports that the over-the-counter histamine H2 receptor antagonist famotidine could help treat the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) appeared from April 2020. We, therefore, examined reports on interactions between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and histamine receptor antagonists.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed by 19 September 2020, and updated on 28 October 2020, in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar using (COVID-19 OR coronavirus OR SARS-CoV-2) AND (histamine antagonist OR famotidine OR cimetidine). ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for COVID-19 and (famotidine or histamine).

RESULTS

Famotidine may be a useful addition in COVID-19 treatment, but the results from prospective randomized trials are as yet awaited. Bioinformatics/drug repurposing studies indicated that, among several medicines, H1 and H2 receptor antagonists may interact with key viral enzymes. However, in vitro studies have to date failed to show a direct inhibition of famotidine on SARS-CoV-2 replication.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical research into the potential benefits of H2 receptor antagonists in managing COVID-19 inflammation began from a simple observation and now is being tested in multi-centre clinical trials. The positive effects of famotidine may be due to H2 receptor-mediated immunomodulatory actions on mast cell histamine-cytokine cross-talk, rather than a direct action on SARS-CoV-2.

Human skin mast cells express H2 and H4, but not H3 receptors

Mast cells generate and release histamine during anaphylactic reactions, and there is pharmacological evidence that histamine regulates this process via specific receptors. Therefore, we examined human leukemic (HMC-1) and normal skin mast cells for the expression of all four currently known histamine receptors. Both cell types expressed H2 and H4 receptors at mRNA and protein levels, whereas H3 receptor specific mRNA and receptor protein was undetectable. Similarly, immunohistochemistry of cutaneous tissue showed an absence of H3 receptor in these cells. Despite transcription of mRNA, H1 receptor protein was only moderately expressed in HMC-1 cells and was virtually absent in skin mast cells. Furthermore, only H1, H2, and H4 receptors were detectable by Western blot analysis of HMC-1 cells. Radiolabeled histamine binding was strongly inhibited only by H2 (ranitidine)- and H3/H4 (FUB 108)-specific antagonists. Histamine-induced increase of cAMP was inhibited by the H2 receptor antagonist famotidine, whereas induction of IP3 was not observed, making signaling via the H1 receptor unlikely. These data show that human mast cells constitutively express primarily H2 and H4 receptors and that H2 receptors are functionally linked to cellular processes. They provide new insights into the mechanisms that govern auto- and paracrine histamine-induced mast cell functions.

Pathophysiological significance of the distribution of histamine receptor sub-types: a proposed dual role for histamine in inflammation and type I hypersensitivity reactions

The pathophysiological significance of histaminergic receptors located on the membranes of immunocompetent cells is reviewed. H2-receptor agonists decrease the immunological histamine release from isolated serosal mast cells and from isolated hearts taken from actively sensitised guinea-pigs. Histamine and H2-receptor agonists inhibit the generation of superoxide anion from human neutrophils activated by FMLP and by substance P. These observations lend further support to the hypothesis of an immunodepression exerted by the activation of H2-receptors, which can be converted to immunostimulation by treatment with H2-receptor antagonists.

The antianaphylactic action of histamine H2-receptor agonists in the guinea-pig isolated heart

The effects of histamine and of H1- and H2-receptor agonists on the response to specific antigen were studied in isolated hearts taken from actively sensitized guinea-pigs. Histamine and H2-receptor agonists (dimaprit, impromidine) dose-dependently decrease the positive chronotropic and inotropic effects, and the severity of arrhythmias evoked by the challenge of sensitized hearts with specific antigen. Nordimaprit and the selective H1-receptor agonist 2-pyridyl-ethyl-amine (2-PEA) did not modify the patterns of cardiac anaphylaxis. The positive inotropic and chronotropic responses of the isolated heart to exogenous histamine appear to be partly reduced in the presence of dimaprit. The H2-receptor agonists decrease the amount of histamine released during cardiac anaphylaxis which is increased by cimetidine, while nordimaprit and PEA were ineffective, indicating an inhibitory function afforded by H2-receptors in cardiac anaphylaxis.

Surface histamine receptors in rat peritoneal mast cells. Separation of receptor-bearing cells via binding to a histamine-protein conjugate, Cell-ect

The Seragen Cell-ect Total Histamine KitTM was used to separate histamine receptor-bearing rat peritoneal mast cells from cells lacking these receptors. It was found that approximately 75% of the peritoneal mast cell population carried cell surface histamine receptors. The results further suggest that the mast cell histamine receptors present are mainly of an H1-type, as judged by the capacity of a specific H1-antagonist to reduce the histamine receptor-dependent cell adhesion. Moreover, an H1-agonist is less efficient in this respect and an H2-antagonist does not affect the cell adhesion at all. A possible functional role for these receptors, however, remains to be clarified.

A new in vivo method for the measurement of repetitive anaphylactic responses in the guinea-pig

The established Konzett-Rossler bronchorespiratory model has been combined with a unique ovalbumin sensitization procedure to give a novel method to measure anaphylaxis in the anaesthetized guinea-pig. Following antigen challenge, up to eight equal bronchoconstrictor responses to the same dose can be generated from a single animal over a 120 min period. Total inhibition of the anaphylactic response can be elicited by four different classes of compound, namely salbutamol, mepyramine, theophylline and dimaprit. Cromoglycate failed to cause any inhibition. The method is discussed with particular reference to the antigen sensitization procedure, which differs substantially from other regimens previously employed and gives rise to heat labile antibody.