Does carotid eversion endarterectomy and reimplantation reduce the risk of restenosis?

Depth of cervical plexus block and phrenic nerve blockade: a randomized trial

Background and objectives

Cervical plexus blocks are commonly used to facilitate carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in the awake patient. These blocks can be divided into superficial, intermediate, and deep blocks by their relation to the fasciae of the neck. We hypothesized that the depth of block would have a significant impact on phrenic nerve blockade and consequently hemi-diaphragmatic motion.

Methods

We enrolled 45 patients in an observer blinded randomized controlled trial, scheduled for elective, awake CEA. Patients received either deep, intermediate, or superficial cervical plexus blocks, using 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine mixed with an MRI contrast agent. Before and after placement of the block, transabdominal ultrasound measurements of diaphragmatic movement were performed. Patients underwent MRI of the neck to evaluate spread of the injectate, as well as lung function measurements. The primary outcome was ipsilateral difference of hemi-diaphragmatic motion during forced inspiration between study groups.

Results

Postoperatively, forced inspiration movement of the ipsilateral diaphragm (4.34±1.06, 3.86±1.24, 2.04±1.20 (mean in cm±SD for superficial, intermediate and deep, respectively)) was statistically different between block groups (p<0.001). Differences were also seen during normal inspiration. Lung function, oxygen saturation, complication rates, and patient satisfaction did not differ. MRI studies indicated pronounced permeation across the superficial fascia, but nevertheless easily distinguishable spread of injectate within the targeted compartments.

Conclusions

We studied the characteristics and side effects of cervical plexus blocks by depth of injection. Diaphragmatic dysfunction was most pronounced in the deep cervical plexus block group.

Trial registration number

EudraCT 2017-001300-30.

Carotid Body Baroreceptor Preservation and Control of Arterial Pressure in Eversion Carotid Endarterectomy

The technique of the eversion carotid endarterectomy (ECEA), as an alternative to the conventional endarterectomy with primary or patch angioplasty, is an established technique for managing internal carotid artery stenoses and recently its application has been upgraded through the European Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines (Recommendation 55: Class 1, Level A). However, the typical eversion method has been associated with postoperative hypertension due to loss of the baroreceptor reflex; the standard oblique transection at the bulb performed in the eversion endarterectomy interrupts either the baroreceptor sensoring tissue, which is mostly located in the adventitia at the medial portion of the proximal internal carotid artery, or even the proper Hering nerve, a branch of the glossopharyngeal nerve. These actions deregulate the natural negative feedback of the carotid baroreceptor. Guided by the anatomical location of the baroreceptor sensor we have elaborated a slight modification of the classical ECEA to maintain as much as possible of the viable carotid baroreceptor sensoring surface. By extending the oblique incision distal to the carotid bifurcation in the medial part of the internal carotid artery stem, an eyebrow-like part of the proximal internal carotid artery is maintained and the axis from the sensoring tissue to the nerve of Hering is protected and following the endarterectomy, postoperative arterial blood pressure levels are lower than in the classical ECEA due to the maintenance of the efficiency of the baroreceptor reflex. During the period from September 2016 to November 2018, carotid endarterectomy was performed in 57 patients. Twenty-eight of them underwent the typical ECEA and 29 patients had the modified eyebrow eversion carotid endarterectomy (me-ECEA). The changes of blood pressure baseline during the postoperative course in ECEA and me-ECEA group were analyzed and compared. Postoperative hypertension was defined as an elevation of systolic blood pressure (SBP) greater than 140 mm Hg. Patients who underwent typical ECEA had significantly higher postoperative blood pressure values compared with those who underwent me-ECEA. Actually, the mean postoperative SBP was 172.67 ± 24.59 mm Hg in the typical ECEA group compared with 160.86 ± 12.83 mm Hg in the me-ECEA group ( p  = 0.023). The mean diastolic blood pressure in the ECEA group was 65.42 ± 11.39 mm Hg compared with 58.06 ± 9.06 mm Hg in the me-ECEA group ( p  = 0.009). Our proposed me-ECEA technique seems to be related to lower rates of postoperative hypertension compared with the typical ECEA, probably due to the sparing of the main mass of the baroreceptor apparatus; this improved modification (me-ECEA) of the typical eversion procedure could represent an alternative ECEA technique with its inherent advantages.

A comparison of results with eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy from the Vascular Quality Initiative and the Mid-America Vascular Study Group

OBJECTIVE

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is usually performed with eversion (ECEA) or conventional (CCEA) technique. Previous studies report conflicting results with respect to outcomes for ECEA and CCEA. We compared patient characteristics and outcomes for ECEA and CCEA.

METHODS

Deidentified data for CEA patients were obtained from the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative (SVS VQI) database for years 2003 to 2013. Second (contralateral) CEA, reoperative CEA, CEA after previous carotid stenting, or CEA concurrent with cardiac surgery were excluded, leaving 2365 ECEA and 17,155 CCEA for comparison. Univariate analysis compared patients, procedures, and outcomes. Survival analysis was also performed for mortality. Multivariate analysis was used selectively to examine the possible independent predictive value of variables on outcomes.

RESULTS

Groups were similar with respect to sex, demographics, comorbidities, and preoperative neurologic symptoms, except that ECEA patients tended to be older (71.3 vs 69.8 years; P < .001). CCEA was more often performed with general anesthesia (92% vs 80%; P < .001) and with a shunt (59% vs 24%; P < .001). Immediate perioperative ipsilateral neurologic events (ECEA, 1.3% vs CCEA, 1.2%; P = .86) and any ipsilateral stroke (ECEA, 0.8% vs CCEA, 0.9%; P = .84) were uncommon in both groups. ECEA tended to take less time (median 99 vs 114 minutes; P < .001). However, ECEA more often required a return to the operating room for bleeding (1.4% vs 0.8%; P = .002), a difference that logistic regression analysis showed was only partly explained by differential use of protamine. Life-table estimated 1-year freedom from any cortical neurologic event was similar (96.7% vs 96.7%). Estimated survival was similar comparing ECEA with CCEA at 1 year (96.7% vs 95.9%); however, estimated survival tended to decline more rapidly in ECEA patients after ∼2 years. Cox proportional hazards modeling confirmed that independent predictors of mortality included age, coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and smoking, but also demonstrated that CEA type was not an independent predictor of mortality. The 1-year freedom from recurrent stenosis >50% was lower for ECEA (88.8% vs 94.3%, P < .001). However, ECEA and CCEA both had a very high rate of freedom from reoperation at 1 year (99.5% vs 99.6%; P = .67).

CONCLUSIONS

ECEA and CCEA appear to provide similar freedom from neurologic morbidity, death, and reintervention. ECEA was associated with significantly shorter procedure times. Furthermore, ECEA obviates the expenses, including increased operative time, associated with use of a patch in CCEA, and a shunt, more often used in CCEA in this database. These potential benefits may be reduced by a slightly greater requirement for early return to the operating room for bleeding.

Comparison of two surgical techniques for carotid endarterectomy: conventional and eversion

BACKGROUND

The role of carotid endarterectomy for the treatment of atherosclerotic carotid bifurcation disease is now well established. The aim of this study was to compare durability, postoperative death, stroke, minor strokes, cranial nerve injuries, neck hematomas, myocardial infarctions, or surgical defects and restenosis at the operative site following short- and mid-term duration of the advantages eversion carotid endarterectomy (E-CEA) compared to conventional carotid endarterectomy (C-CEA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between March 2003 and November 2012, primary CEAs were performed in 380 consecutive patients by the same surgical groups. These patients were evaluated retrospectively. C-CEA was performed in 202 patients, and E-CEA was performed in 178 patients. Carotid duplex ultrasonography was performed in all patients at 1, 6, 12 and 24 months after CEA to identify residual atherosclerotic carotid disease.

RESULTS

Mean age was 67.3±13.4 years in the E-CEA group and 64.8±14.8 years in the C-CEA group. Mean cross-clamping time in the E-CEA group was 9.54±2.6 minutes and 12.62±2.7 minutes for C-CEA group (P=0.236). Three postoperative strokes occurred (one after E-CEA and two after C-CEA). In the E-CEA group and C-CEA group respectively, carotid stenosis rates were found in 4 patients (2.24%) and in 5 (2.97%) at a follow-up period of 26 months.

CONCLUSION

Classical endarterectomy still remains the gold standard surgical technique for patients who are selected for coronary artery disease surgery. Nevertheless, we believe that eversion endarterectomy, which has some advantages, must be kept in mind as an alternative approach.

Permissive hypertension during awake eversion carotid endarterectomy: a physiologic approach for cerebral protection

BACKGROUND

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is often completed with general anesthesia and routine shunting; however, shunting is only required in a small group of at-risk patients to maintain adequate cerebral perfusion. Selective shunting during CEA is performed to normalize cerebral hemodynamics for patients determined to be at risk. Eversion CEA with selective shunting for neurologic dysfunction in patients that are awake/sedated is described, as well as routine use of permissive hypertension (PH), which uses standard cardiovascular medications to recruit the cerebral collateral network and reduce the need for shunting.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review of all CEA procedures performed from July 2006 to April 2013 was conducted. Procedures were divided into 3 groups: pre-PH phase (group A), PH-test phase (group B), and routine PH phase (group C). Operative reports and anesthesia documentation were reviewed for clamp time, need for shunting, and mean hemodynamics during each case.

RESULTS

During the study period, 232 CEAs met inclusion criteria and were divided into 3 groups: group A (n = 75) was predominate reactionary shunting, group B (n = 41) was predominate reactionary blood pressure augmentation, and group C (n = 116) was pre-emptive PH. When combining groups A and B, the at-risk group consisted of 21 of 116 (18.1%) patients who had a neurologic compromise develop after clamping the internal carotid artery and required a shunt or altered blood pressure hemodynamics. In comparison with group C, routine use of PH pre-emptively before clamping as a standard intraoperative technique led to need for shunting in 1 of 116 (0.86%) (p ≤ 0.001) and significantly reduced operative time (p ≤ 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Routine use of PH during clamp time can recruit the cerebral collateral network and substantially reduce the at-risk group and need for shunting in awake/sedated patients.

Carotid surgery in private practice: what kind of change in the last 15 years?

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study analyzes and compares the results of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CE) for atherosclerotic stenosis obtained by 2 surgeons during two 5-year periods. Group 1 (G1) represents the first period (January 1994-December 1998) and group 2 (G2) represents the second period (January 2006-December 2010). Our objective was to answer the 2 following questions: (1) Has the population changed between these 2 periods with regard to age, risk factors, and symptoms? (2) Have the techniques we used in G2--local anesthesia and eversion technique--improved the results?

METHODS

G1 included 682 CE procedures on 610 patients and G2 included 629 procedures on 592 patients. The following factors were analyzed in G1 and G2: distribution of age and sex, the main risk factors (diabetes and cardiovascular risk), symptomatology, the degree of stenosis, the preoperative computed tomography (CT) data, the type of anesthesia (general or local), the use of an intraoperative shunt, surgical techniques, postoperative patency, cardiac complications, central and peripheral neurologic complications, and reoperations. In conformity with the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial classifications, stenosis of >70% was included in this survey. Loops, tumors, aneurysms, and restenosis were excluded. Heparin (300 U.I./kg) was administered. Shunt placing was selective. The 3 most common techniques used were eversion, longitudinal CE with patch angioplasty, and CE with direct closure. Postoperative patency was controlled by intravenous digital angiography or duplex ultrasonography. Follow-up occurred until postoperative day 30.

RESULTS

Compared with G1, the incidence of arterial hypertension, diabetes, and coronary atherosclerosis treated by angioplasty increased significantly in G2; local anesthesia replaced general anesthesia in G2, and fewer intraoperative shunts were used (P = 0.034). The technique of direct closure of the arteriotomy was no longer used. In contrast to G1, in G2 no postoperative carotid thromboses (P = 1.8) and no lethal strokes (P = 5.44) were observed. The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events on postoperative day 30 was 1.7% in G1 compared with 0.79% in G2. The combined mortality and morbidity rate--including reoperations and peripheral neurologic deficits--was 3.95% in G1 compared with 3.81% in G2.

CONCLUSION

Despite a major increase in risk factors, the combined use of local anesthesia and eversion technique, when technically feasible, improved our results in G2.

Clinical, anatomic, and procedural durability of carotid revascularization

Carotid endarterectomy and carotid angioplasty with stenting are 2 common approaches to revascularization. Phase III randomized clinical trials have focused on comparisons of periprocedural outcomes and composite outcomes that combine procedural events and clinical events during follow-up. The comparison of outcomes beyond the perioperative risk period, where the principal concern is durability, defined in clinical, anatomic, and procedural terms, has received less attention. The purpose of this review is to discuss factors that may influence durability and to compare the durability of carotid revascularization techniques beyond the perioperative period using data from randomized clinical trials.

Primary closure, routine patching, and eversion endarterectomy: what is the current state of the literature supporting use of these techniques?

Our objective in this article was to review the most recent literature on the status of carotid patching or primary carotid closure following carotid endarterectomy; to determine the best patch material if needed; and to clarify the place of eversion carotid endarterectomy in management of carotid artery atherosclerosis. In order to accomplish this, a literature review was performed of the Ovid, PubMed and MedLine databases using appropriate search terms. An evidence-based approach was taken; with all articles graded using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network system (levels of evidence 1 to 5) and recommendations were made using an A to D system. Most weight was given to well-conducted, adequately powered, randomized control trials. After review of the literature, we were able to make the following Grade A recommendation: carotid patching is superior to primary closure, resulting in fewer postoperative strokes and a lower incidence of restenosis in most surgeons' hands. However, it was also concluded that, based on review of the literature, that the choice of patch material in 2007 has little impact; eversion carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and conventional patch CEA have equivalent postoperative morbidity and similar incidences of long-term restenosis. In conclusion, the technique of CEA continues to evolve, but in most reported series, immediate and long-term outcomes are excellent. A variety of technical approaches are acceptable, but it appears that carotid patching remains superior to primary closure.

Restenosis after eversion vs patch closure carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVES

Recurrent stenosis after carotid endarterectomy (CEA), previously reported to occur in 1%/year after operation, is the finite limitation of CEA. Eversion endarterectomy has a perceived lower incidence of recurrent stenosis, although data to support this contention are conflicting. The goal of the present study was to compare the late anatomic results of patch closure (PC) vs eversion CEA.

METHODS

Between January 1, 1995 and June 30, 2005, 950 CEA were performed by the senior author with adoption of eversion (EV) as the primary technique as of January 1, 2001. With minimum of 1-year follow-up by study inclusion criteria, complete follow-up data (including a duplex scan) was available for 155 PC and 135 EV patients. Incidence of moderate (50% to 70%) and severe (>70%) restenosis was examined at < or =2 months and >1 year after operation. Study end-points included late stroke, survival, and freedom from restenosis (moderate and severe) and were assessed by actuarial methods.

RESULTS

There were no differences in relevant demographic/clinical parameters, indication for surgery (69% overall asymptomatic) or early perioperative stroke/death (1.1% overall; P = .25) between PC and EV. After correction for different mean follow-up intervals (PC = 5.5 years vs EV = 3.5 years) by actuarial methods, there was no significant difference in late moderate (P = .91) or severe (P = .54) recurrent stenosis between PC and EV. In the group of patients with at least 1-year follow-up, 11/290 (3.8%) patients (4/135 EV, 7/155 PC; P = .39) required reintervention on their operated carotid artery at a cumulative follow-up interval of 4.5 years. Three strokes (3/290; 1.1%) occurred during late follow-up, all in the PC group, with only one related to the operated carotid artery. Late survival was similar between EV and PC, (P = .86). Female gender (odds ratio [OR] 3.72[1.02-13.5], P = .046) was associated with severe restenosis irrespective of surgical technique. Univariate analysis also showed that female gender (OR 7.6[CI: 0.88-66.7], P = .042) was associated with late stroke.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate that restenosis rates are similar between eversion and patch CEA and likely represent biological remodeling phenomenon rather than technical variations of operations. While EV offers distinct advantages in certain anatomic circumstances, adoption of EV with the hope of decreasing restenosis is not warranted.

Initial experience with eversion carotid endarterectomy: Absence of a learning curve for the first 100 patients

OBJECTIVE

Eversion carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been touted as superior to standard CEA with patch closure because of allegedly lower restenosis rates and greater technical ease of performance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the early experience of one vascular surgeon beginning to use this technique.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study in an academic vascular surgical practice. The first 100 patients undergoing CEA via the eversion technique were compared with 100 contemporaneous patients who had standard CEA with patch closure. Residual (first examination within 3 months) or recurrent postoperative duplex scan stenosis, perioperative neurologic deficit, and mortality were analyzed by cumulative sum failure and Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis.

RESULTS

Operative indications were not significantly different between eversion and standard CEA patients (63% vs 60% asymptomatic, 10% vs 7% stroke, 4% vs 5% amaurosis, and 23% vs 28% transient ischemia). Intraoperative shunting was more commonly used during eversion CEA (87% vs 59%; P < .01). Perioperative neurologic deficits included amaurosis (n = 1) after eversion CEA and transient cerebral ischemia (n = 1) and retinal infarction (n = 1) after standard CEA, with one cardiac death each. By 36 months, one other patient in each group had experienced a transient ischemic event, but there were no strokes. Four carotids occluded within 36 months of eversion CEA, compared with one occlusion after standard CEA (not significant). Patients undergoing eversion CEA showed no difference in critical (>80%) residual or recurrent stenosis rates. However, after eversion CEA, a greater degree of greater than 50% recurrent stenosis was observed at 36 months (38% vs 6%; P < .001) despite similar residual stenosis rates. Cumulative sum failure analysis showed no plateau among patients undergoing eversion CEA, thus indicating the absence of a learning curve, at least within the first 100 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite enthusiasm by advocates for eversion CEA, the recurrent greater than 50% stenosis rate remained high for the first 100 patients who underwent this technique, with no evidence of a learning curve. This observation implies that vascular surgeons considering adoption of this technique should monitor their own early results carefully.

[Open therapy of carotid stenosis by endarterectomy]

Carotid endarterectomy is a routine procedure in vascular surgery. Besides clinical symptoms and the degree of stenosis, indication for surgery is influenced by the perioperative complication rate. This depends on stroke and the mortality rate and should not exceed 6% in symptomatic, high-grade stenosis, according to the Stroke Council of the American Heart Association. Techniques of carotid disobliteration include the conventional open thrombendarterectomy by means of a longitudinal arteriotomy and the eversion technique. In the former, closure by direct suture or patch plasty are possible. Different methods for cerebral protection during the clamping time exist, of which shunt protection is the most common. The various operative techniques are described and critically discussed.

Comparison of Standard Carotid Endarterectomy with Dacron Patch Angioplasty versus Eversion Carotid Endarterectomy during a 4-Year Period

Currently, the two primary approaches to carotid endarterectomy for extracranial carotid stenosis are carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty and eversion carotid endarterectomy. In a retrospective study over a 4-year period from 1998 to 2002, we had an opportunity to compare the two approaches as two surgeons utilized carotid endarterectomy with Dacron patch angioplasty and two other surgeons utilized eversion carotid endarterectomy. During the 4-year period, 189 carotid endarterectomies were performed, 125 with Dacron patch angioplasty (CE-P) and 64 with eversion (EE) endarterectomy. There were no significant differences in age of the patients, operative indication, or associated risk factors between the two groups. Perioperative outcome measurement in the CE-P versus EE included stroke or transient ischemic attack, 1.6 per cent versus 1.56 per cent, cranial nerve injury, 2.4 per cent versus 3.13 per cent; death, 0.8 per cent versus 0 per cent; need for operative conversion or revision, 2.4 per cent versus 7.81 per cent, respectively. Only the need for operative conversion or revision reached significant difference ( P < 0.05), although the need decreased to 4 per cent for the last 50 EE cases. Recurrent stenosis of 50 per cent to 79 per cent was 4.88 per cent versus 3.13 per cent and >80 per cent was 0.81 per cent versus 0 per cent in the CE-P versus EE group over a follow up of 16.3 months and 17.0 months, respectively. We conclude that both CE-P and EE are equally efficacious operative approaches to extracranial carotid occlusive disease.

Carotid bypass with polytetrafluoroethylene grafts: a study of 110 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the standard treatment for atherosclerotic lesions involving the carotid bifurcation. However, CEA can be challenging under some conditions. We describe the technique and outcome of prosthetic carotid bypass grafting (PCB) with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts as an elective alternative to CEA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data came from a series of 110 consecutive PCBs, that is, 9.6% of 1140 carotid revascularization procedures performed in our department between September 1986 and July 2002. Primary indications for PCB were extensive atherosclerotic lesions (n = 45, 40.9%), carotid stenosis associated with kinking (n = 29, 26.4%), recurrent stenosis (n = 18, 16.4%), and stenosis after radiation therapy (n = 7, 6.4%).

RESULTS

The combined stroke and death rate at 30 days was 0.9%. Mean duration of follow-up was 647 +/- 71 days. Four carotid bypass grafts (3.6%) became occluded, and stenosis recurred in 1 (0.9%). At 3 years, overall actuarial survival was 81.4 +/- 11.5 and actuarial stroke-free rate was 97.7 +/- 2.3. There were no fatal strokes.

CONCLUSION

PCB is a viable technique for treatment of extensive atherosclerotic carotid lesions, recurrent carotid stenosis, and carotid stenosis after radiation therapy. Postoperative stroke, occlusion, and recurrent stenosis rates are comparable to those associated with CEA performed under optimal conditions.

Selective shunting with eversion carotid endarterectomy

PURPOSE

The consensus is that eversion carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a safe, effective, and durable surgical technique. Concern remains, however, regarding insertion of a shunt during the procedure. We studied the advisability of shunting with eversion CEA by comparing patients who underwent eversion CEA with and without shunting.

METHODS

Over 9 years, 624 primary eversion CEAs were performed in 580 selected patients to treat symptomatic (n = 398, 63.8%) and asymptomatic (n = 226, 36.2%) carotid lesions. All eversion CEAs were performed by the same surgeon (E.B.), with the patient under deep general anesthesia, with continuous electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring for selective shunting, based exclusively on EEG changes consistent with cerebral ischemia. A Pruitt-Inahara shunt was used in 43 eversion CEAs (6.9%). All patients underwent postoperative duplex ultrasound scanning and clinical follow-up at 1, 6, and 12 months and once a year thereafter. Mean follow-up was 52 months (range, 3-91 months). The main end points were perioperative (30-day) stroke and death, and recurrent stenosis.

RESULTS

No perioperative death occurred in this series. Overall, ischemic perioperative stroke occurred in 4 of 624 patients (0.6%). Two strokes were minor and two were major. Only one (major) stroke occurred in the group with shunt insertion (1 of 43, 2.3%; P = not significant); the everted internal carotid artery was patent. Long-term follow-up was performed in all living patients. There was no late recurrent stenosis (>50%), and one late asymptomatic occlusive event occurred in the group without shunt insertion.

CONCLUSIONS

Shunt insertion can be safely performed during eversion CEA. Perioperative mortality and morbidity after eversion CEA are not statistically modified with shunting.

Clinical application of eversion carotid endarterectomy

The results of 250 eversion carotid endarterectomies (ECEAs) in 227 consecutive patients in 1 institution were evaluated. The outcomes of 250 consecutive ECEAs at North Shore University Hospital by a single surgeon, between January 1998 and August 2001, were recorded prospectively. In the single series of 250 ECEAs the 30-day operative mortality was 0.4% and the perioperative stroke rate was 0.8%. During a mean follow-up of 23 months, the recurrent stenosis rate was 0.8%. A reduction in stroke and mortality rates is often observed with ECEA.

Carotid Eversion Endarterectomy: Perioperative Outcome and Restenosis Incidence

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for stroke prevention can be performed with minimal perioperative mortality and morbidity rates. The type of surgical technique used is important to achieve optimal outcome from CEA. The purpose of this study was to analyze the perioperative and late results of carotid eversion endarterectomy (CEE) in more than 400 procedures. From August 1992 to December 1999, 402 primary CEEs were performed in 388 selected patients for symptomatic (235/58.4%) and asymptomatic (167/41.6%) carotid lesions. During the same period, 234 primary CEAs with patch closure were performed in 229 selected patients. All CEAs were carried out with continuous electroencephalographic monitoring for selective shunting, using deep general anesthesia. All patients underwent postoperative duplex ultrasound study and clinical follow-up at 1, 6, and 12 months and every year thereafter. The mean follow-up was 50 months (range 3-88). Main end points were perioperative stroke and death, and restenosis. Our results showed that use of the CEE procedure can reduce perioperative mortality and stroke risk rates to around zero and results in no restenosis.

Eversion vs conventional carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

to determine whether eversion carotid endarterectomy (CEA) was safe and more effective than conventional CEA.

METHODS

controlled trials comparing eversion vs conventional technique for CEA were identified from the Cochrane Stroke Review Group database plus additional hand searching. Researchers were contacted to identify additional published and unpublished studies. Randomised and pseudorandomised trials comparing eversion to conventional techniques in patients undergoing CEA were examined. Outcomes included stroke and death, carotid restenosis/occlusion, and local complications.

RESULTS

five trials were included comprising 2465 patients and 2590 arteries. There were no significant differences in the rate of perioperative stroke or death (1.7% vs 2.6%, odds ratio [OR] 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10-1.82) and stroke during follow-up (1.4% vs 1.7%; OR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.43-1.64) between eversion and conventional CEA techniques. Eversion CEA was associated with a significantly lower rate of restenosis >50% during follow-up (2.5% vs 5.2%, OR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.32-0.72). There were no statistically significant differences in local complications between the eversion and conventional group. When eversion procedures were compared with patch procedures only, non-significant differences were found in primary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

eversion CEA may be associated with low risk of arterial occlusion and restenosis. However, numbers are too small to definitively assess the benefits and disadvantages of eversion CEA. Reduced restenosis rates did not appear to be associated with clinical benefit in terms of reduced stroke risk, either perioperatively or later. Until further evidence is available, the choice of the CEA technique should be based on the experience and familiarity of the individual surgeon.

Durability of eversion carotid endarterectomy: comparison with primary closure and carotid patch angioplasty

OBJECTIVES

Despite numerous studies in which various methods for arteriotomy closure after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) have been addressed, the optimum surgical technique to reduce complications and late carotid restenosis has yet to be firmly established. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the results of the eversion CEA technique with those of conventional CEA with either primary closure or carotid patch angioplasty, and to determine under clinical conditions whether eversion CEA influences the results and restenosis rate.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Over a 3-year period, 322 CEAs performed on 296 consecutive patients were concurrently evaluated. This study included 118 eversion CEAs, 97 CEAs with primary closure, and 107 CEAs with patch angioplasty. There were no differences in demographics, in surgical indications, or in the severity of carotid disease (not significant [NS]). The choice of CEA technique was not randomized because of technical considerations and surgeon preference. After entry into the protocol, no patients were excluded or withdrawn. Carotid restenosis was defined as a > 60% lumen reduction at the CEA site with established duplex ultrasonography criteria.

RESULTS

The mean operative time for eversion CEA was 31 minutes, for CEA-primary closure it was 39 minutes, and for CEA-patch angioplasty it was 46 minutes (P <.01). The operative mortality rate for eversion CEA was 0.8% (1 patient), for CEA-primary closure it was 1.0% (1 patient), and for CEA-patch angioplasty it was 2.8% (3 patients) (NS). The postoperative stroke rate was 0.8% after eversion CEA, 1.0% after CEA-primary closure, and 2.8% after CEA-patch angioplasty (NS). The combined stroke and death rate in each group was thus 0.8% for eversion CEA (1 stroke-death), 1% for CEA with primary closure (1 stroke-death), and 5% for CEA with patch angioplasty (1 stroke-death, 2 fatal myocardial infarctions, and 2 nonfatal strokes) (NS). Transient ischemic attacks occurred in 2.5% after eversion CEA, in 5.2% after CEA-primary closure, and in 2.9% with CEA-patch angioplasty (NS). The mean clinical follow-up for all three groups was 23 months (range, 6-42 months) (NS). The restenosis rate was 1.7% after eversion CEA, 9.3% after CEA-primary closure, and 6.5% after CEA-patch angioplasty (P <.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective, nonrandomized clinical study indicates that eversion CEA is an effective surgical option comparable to conventional CEA with either primary arteriotomy closure or carotid patch angioplasty. No differences were found between eversion CEA and these more widely accepted CEA closure techniques with respect to operative morbidity and mortality. These data indicate, however, that eversion CEA has a lower restenosis rate than conventional CEA closure techniques and thus superior long-term durability.

Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy for preventing stroke

BACKGROUND

Carotid endarterectomy is conventionally undertaken by a longitudinal arteriotomy. Eversion carotid endarterectomy (CEA), which employs a transverse arteriotomy and reimplantation of the carotid artery, is reported to be associated with low perioperative stroke and restenosis rates but an increased risk of complications associated with a distal intimal flap.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to determine whether eversion CEA was safe and more effective than conventional CEA. The null-hypothesis was that there was no difference between the eversion and the conventional CEA techniques (performed either with primary closure or patch angioplasty).

SEARCH STRATEGY

The reviewers searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched: December 1999), and hand searched eight surgical journals and conference proceedings. Researchers were contacted to identify additional published and unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised trials comparing eversion to conventional techniques in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy were examined in this review. Outcomes were stroke and death, carotid restenosis/occlusion and local complications.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted independently by two reviewers to assess eligibility and describe trial characteristics, and by one reviewer for the meta-analyses. Discrepancies were resolved by discussion. When possible, unpublished data were obtained from investigators.

MAIN RESULTS

Five trials were included for a total of 2465 patients and 2590 arteries. Three trials included bilateral carotid endarterectomies. In one trial, arteries rather than patients were randomised so that it was not clear how many patients had been randomised in each group, therefore, information on the risk of stroke and death from this study were considered in a separate analysis. There were no significant differences in the rate of perioperative stroke and/or death (1.7% vs 2.6%, odds ratio [OR] 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10-1.82) and stroke during follow-up (1.4% vs 1.7%, OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.43-1.64) between eversion and conventional CEA techniques. Eversion CEA was associated with a significantly lower rate of restenosis >50% during follow-up (2.5% vs 5.2%, OR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.32 -0.72). However, there was no evidence that the eversion technique for CEA was associated with a lower rate of neurological events when compared to conventional CEA. There were no statistically significant differences in local complications between the eversion and conventional group. No data were available to define the cost-benefit of eversion CEA technique.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Eversion CEA may be associated with low risk of arterial occlusion and restenosis. However, numbers are too small to definitively assess benefits or harms. Reduced restenosis rates did not appear to be associated with clinical benefit in terms of reduced stroke risk, either perioperatively or later. Until further evidence is available, the choice of the CEA technique should depend on the experience and familiarity of the individual surgeon.

Carotid endarterectomy with reimplantation of the internal carotid artery: perioperative risk, and incidence of recurrent stenosis in 167 procedures

Between 1990-1998, 167 carotid endarterectomies with reimplantation were performed on 153 patients. Indications for operation were asymptomatic stenosis >60% (50.2%), transient ischemic attacks (17. 4%), amaurosis fugax (14.4%) and previous stroke (18%). Our method involves transection of the internal carotid artery at its origin, standard endarterectomy without any eversion maneuver and reimplantation. Our results showed one postoperative stroke, which occurred at the contralateral side and no deaths with an overall perioperative morbidity and mortality rate of 0.59%. In addition, two (1.19%) transient ischemic attacks and one (0.59%) temporary ataxic event were noted with complete resolution of the symptoms. The 5-yr primary patency rate was 96% with a 95% 5-yr freedom from ipsilateral stroke. The mean follow up period was 22 months. In conclusion, we believe that our method, is relatively easy to perform, it has excellent results and it eliminates some of the disadvantages associated with the eversion technique.

Use of shunts with eversion carotid endarterectomy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of carotid shunting in the context of eversion endarterectomy. A comparison of patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy by eversion with and without shunts was performed.

METHODS

Over a 5-year period, 2724 eversion carotid endarterectomies were performed. In most of these operations patients were under cervical block anesthesia. A shunt was used in 112 eversion endarterectomies (4.1%). Cervical block anesthesia was used in 103 patients (92.0%), general anesthesia was used in 5 patients (4.5%), and 4 patients (3.6%) were converted from cervical block to general anesthesia intraoperatively. The indications for shunting were neurologic deterioration in 99 patients (88.4%) who were under cervical block anesthesia, procedures performed in neurologically unstable or otherwise compromised patients who were under general anesthesia, and the operator's discretion in the remaining eight patients.

RESULTS

There was a combined stroke/death rate of 2.7% in the shunt group. These three cases included one death from myocardial infarction and one delayed death due to intracerebral hemorrhage after discharge. Shunt insertion was unrelated to the negative outcome in these two cases. One perioperative major stroke in the shunt group was identified. Follow-up averaged 12.3 months (range, 1-53 months).

CONCLUSION

Carotid shunts can be used effectively in the context of eversion endarterectomy. Shunt insertion is not associated with an increased stroke/death rate in these patients.

A prospective randomized study on bilateral carotid endarterectomy: patching versus eversion

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical outcome and restenosis incidence of patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy with patch closure (CEAP) on one side and carotid eversion endarterectomy (CEE) on the other.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Although a few investigators have compared the results of CEAP versus CEE, no reports have compared the outcome of CEAP versus CEE in the same patient.

METHODS

Eighty-six patients were randomly selected for sequential surgical treatment involving either CEAP/CEE or CEE/CEAP. All patients underwent postoperative duplex ultrasound study and clinical follow-up at 1, 6, and 12 months and every year thereafter. Various factors were analyzed to ascertain any association with restenosis, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the risk of restenosis.

RESULTS

Demographic and clinical data were similar in the CEAP and CEE groups. The selective shunting rate was statistically higher in the CEAP group. There were no perioperative deaths. Although the incidence of perioperative ipsilateral stroke was not significant, CEAP patients had a rate of combined transient ischemic attacks and strokes that approached statistical significance. The mean follow-up was 40 months. CEAP patients had a significantly higher incidence of restenosis and combined occlusive events and restenoses. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that CEE had a significantly better cumulative patency rate than CEAP and that freedom from restenoses at 24 and 36 months was 87% and 83% for CEAP and 98% and 98% for CEE, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CEE is less likely to cause perioperative neurologic complications and restenoses than CEAP. The significantly higher rate of unilateral recurrence suggests that local factors play a more important role than systemic factors in the occurrence of restenosis.

Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy: late results of a prospective multicenter randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

The durability of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) may be affected by carotid restenosis. The data from randomized trials show that the highest incidence of restenosis after CEA occurs from 12 to 18 months after surgery. The optimal CEA technique to reduce perioperative complications and restenosis rates is still undefined. This study examines the long-term clinical outcome and incidence of recurrent stenosis in patients who undergo eversion CEA. Previously published perioperative results of this study did not show statistically significant differences in study endpoints between the eversion and standard techniques.

METHODS

From October 1994 to March 1997, 1353 patients with surgical indications for carotid stenosis were randomly assigned to undergo eversion (n = 678) or standard CEA (n = 675; primary closure, 419; patch, 256). Withdrawal from the assigned treatment occurred in 1.6% of the patients (in 13 assigned to eversion CEA, and in nine assigned to standard CEA). The clinical and duplex scan follow-up examination was 99% complete, and the mean follow-up interval was 33 months (range, 12 to 55 months). The primary outcomes were perioperative and late major stroke and death, carotid restenosis (stenosis >/= 50% of the lumen diameter detected at duplex scanning), and carotid occlusion. The primary evaluation of study outcomes was conducted on the basis of an intention-to-treat analysis.

RESULTS

Restenosis was found at duplex scanning in 56 patients (19 in the eversion group, and 37 in the standard group). Within the standard group, the restenosis rates were 7.9% in the primary closure population and 1.5% in the patched population. Of the patients with restenosis, 36% underwent cerebral angiography that confirmed restenosis in all cases. The cumulative restenosis risk at 4 years was significantly lower in the group that underwent treatment with eversion CEA as compared with the standard group (3.6% vs 9.2%; P =.01), with an absolute risk reduction of 5. 6% and a relative risk reduction of 62%. Eighteen patients would have had to undergo treatment with eversion CEA to prevent one restenosis during the 4-year period. The incidence rate of ipsilateral stroke was 3.3% in the eversion population and 2.2% in the standard group. There were no significant differences in the cumulative risks of ipsilateral stroke (3.9% for eversion, and 2.2% for standard; P =.2) and death (13.1% for eversion, and 12.7% for standard; P =.7)) in the two groups. Of the 18 variables that were examined for their influence on restenosis, eversion CEA (hazard ratio, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.2 to 0.6; P =.0004) and patch CEA (hazard ratio, 0.2; 95% confidence interval, 0.07 to 0.6; P =. 002) were negative independent predictors of restenosis with multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

The EVEREST (EVERsion carotid Endarterectomy versus Standard Trial) showed that eversion CEA is safe, effective, and durable. No statistically significant differences were found in late outcome between the eversion and standard techniques at the available follow-up examination.

Eversion endarterectomy versus open thromboendarterectomy and patch plasty for the treatment of internal carotid artery stenosis

OBJECTIVE

in 1996 we changed our treatment for stenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA) from open thromboendarterectomy and PTFE-patch plasty (TEA) to eversion endarterectomy (EEA).

DESIGN

retrospective study.

METHODS

a total of 475 EEAs of the ICA were performed between 2/96 and 11/96. These results were compared to the results of TEA carried out between 2/94 and 11/94 (n=388).

RESULTS

clamping and operation time were significantly shorter for EEA. Neurological complications included transient ischaemic attacks in 1. 0% in the EEA group versus 1.3% after TEA (p=0.72), minor strokes (0. 6% vs. 1.8%, p=0.10) and major strokes in 1.5% versus 1.1% (p=0.59). The rate of restenosis >50% was 2.5% after EEA and 10.2% after TEA. The only detectable difference of statistical significance in complication rates was in the lesions of the hypoglossal nerve (5.3% vs. 2.6%, p=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

EEA of the ICA is a safe procedure for carotid reconstruction with the additional advantages of short clamping time, possibility of simultaneous shortening of an elongated ICA, and no requirement for patching.

Carotid endarterectomy by eversion technique: its safety and durability

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The outcome of standard longitudinal carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can be measured by preservation of neurologic function with a low incidence of restenosis. Closure of the internal carotid arteriotomy with or without a patch may predispose to restenosis. Alternatively, transection of the internal carotid artery at the bulb with eversion endarterectomy allows expeditious removal of the plaque and direct visualization of the endpoint. Because the proximal internal carotid artery is anastomosed to the common carotid artery, this obviates the need for patch closure. The authors report their results with this technique in more than 2200 procedures.

METHODS

From May 1993 to March 1998, 1855 patients underwent 2249 CEAs using the eversion technique. During the same period, 410 patients had 474 CEAs by standard technique. Three hundred fifteen procedures in the eversion group and 65 procedures in the standard group were combined CEA and coronary artery bypass grafts. Most solo CEAs (97%) were performed in awake patients using regional anesthesia. Shunts were used on demand in 6% of CEAs.

RESULTS

The operative mortality rate was 1.02% (16/1575) in the solo eversion group and 2.2% (9/410) in the standard group. There were 18 permanent neurologic deficits (0.8%) in the eversion group and 11 (2.3%) in the standard group. Transient neurologic deficits occurred in 20 patients (0.9%) in the eversion group and 13 patients (2.7%) in the standard group. Of the 1855 patients, 1786 (96%) presented for duplex ultrasound follow-up. There were seven (0.3%) stenoses greater than 60% in the eversion group versus five (1.1%) in the standard group.

CONCLUSIONS

Eversion CEA can be performed safely with a low rate of stroke and death and a minimal restenosis rate in short- and long-term follow-up.

A randomized study on eversion versus standard carotid endarterectomy: study design and preliminary results: the Everest Trial

PURPOSE

The EVEREST Trial was designed to determine whether the surgical technique influences the durability and complications of carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The current report focuses on the study design and preliminary results.

METHODS

EVEREST is a randomized multicenter trial. A total of 1353 patients with carotid stenosis requiring surgical treatment were randomly assigned to received standard (n = 675) or eversion (n = 678) CEA. Primary end points included carotid occlusion, major stroke, death, and restenosis rate.

RESULTS

The rate of perioperative major stroke and death (1.3 for each study group) and the incidence of early carotid occlusion (0.6% for eversion vs 0.4% for standard) were similar. No significant differences were found between eversion and standard CEA with respect to incidence of perioperative transient ischemic accident, minor stroke, cranial nerve injuries, neck hematoma, myocardial infarction, or surgical defects as detected with intraoperative quality controls. Clamping time was significantly shorter for eversion CEA compared with patch standard procedures (31.7 +/- 15.9 vs 34.5 +/- 14.4 minutes, p = 0.02). A shunt was inserted in 11% of patients undergoing eversion CEAs and in 16% of patients undergoing standard procedures. Overall 30-day events occurred in 13.3% of the eversion group and in 11.4% of the standard group (p = 0.3). At a mean follow-up of 14.9 months (range, 1 to 38 months), 16 (2.4%) restenoses occurred in the eversion group and 28 (4.1%) occurred in the standard group (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.3 to 1.1; p = 0.08).

CONCLUSION

The preliminary results of the EVEREST Trial suggest that eversion CEA is a safe and rapid procedure with low major complication rates. No significant differences in restenosis rates were observed between eversion and standard CEA at the available follow-up. Longer-term results are necessary to assess whether the eversion technique influences the durability of CEA.

Carotid recurrent stenosis and risk of ipsilateral stroke: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

The main goal of follow-up after carotid endarterectomy is to prevent new strokes caused by recurrent stenosis. To determine the most cost-effective follow-up schedule, it is necessary to know the incidence of recurrent stenosis and the risk of stroke it carries.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed using standard meta-analytical techniques.

RESULTS

Incidence of recurrent stenosis: The data were very heterogeneous. The risk of recurrent stenosis was 10% in the first year, 3% in the second, and 2% in the third. Long-term risk of recurrent stenosis is about 1% per year. Risk of stroke: The reported relative risks of stroke in patients with recurrent stenosis compared with patients without recurrent stenosis showed extreme heterogeneity and ranged from 10 to 0.10. The random effects summary estimator of relative risk was 1.88.

CONCLUSIONS

The data were very heterogeneous, and much better data are needed to arrive at truly reliable estimates of these important parameters of follow-up. It is clear, though, that the risk of recurrent stenosis is highest in the first few years after carotid endarterectomy and very low in later years. By use of general decision-analytic arguments, it can be argued that, given the test characteristics of carotid ultrasound, a small number of tests can be done in the first few years and that testing for restenosis should not be done after 4 years.

Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy: a prospective study

OBJECTIVES

To analyse comparatively eversion and conventional CEA for later association with restenosis, perioperative stroke/death and ipsilateral cerebrovascular events (early, late, disabling and non-disabling).

DESIGN

Prospective non-randomised clinical study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 469 patients underwent 514 procedures; 274 (53%) eversion CEA and 240 (47%) conventional CEA. Perioperative monitoring was carried out by clinical evaluation under local anaesthesia or by transcranial Doppler under general anaesthesia. Follow-up was carried out by clinical evaluation and Duplex scanning.

RESULTS

Clamping time was significantly shorter in the eversion group (25.5 +/- 7.4 vs. 28.3 +/- 10.1 min; p = 0.0001; CI delta 4.40/1.12). The perioperative disabling stroke/death rate was 0.7% for eversion vs. 1.2% for conventional CEA, p = 0.6; odds ratio (OR), 0.58. There were two early carotid occlusions (within 30 days) in both groups. According to life-table analysis, after 3 years the probability of > 50% carotid restenosis was significantly lower in the eversion group (2.2% vs. 6.9%, p = 0.03; relative risk reduction 67%). There were no significant differences between the two groups relative to new cerebrovascular events (92% in both groups, p = 0.6). Using multivariate analysis (Cox regression), eversion CEA, and to a lesser extent standard CEA with patch, appeared to protect the vessel from restenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The eversion technique was associated with reduced clamping time and probability of restenosis. However, because of the nature of a non-randomised study, the present analysis should be confirmed by a multicentre randomised trial.

Vessel wall and flow characteristics after carotid endarterectomy: eversion endarterectomy compared with Dacron patch plasty

OBJECTIVES

Experimental studies have demonstrated that decreases in vessel wall compliance and increases in turbulence may contribute to (re)stenosis. We studied vessel wall and flow characteristics after endarterectomy with Dacron patch plasty and after eversion endarterectomy, and compared those findings with the characteristics of non-stenotic, unoperated carotid arteries (controls).

METHODS

Seventy-four patients who underwent 84 carotid endarterectomies were studied postoperatively by ultrasonography (2-24 months) Recorded variables included the diameter of the bulb, strain, elastic modulus (stiffness), and presence of turbulent flow.

RESULTS

The vessel wall and flow characteristics of the two groups differed significantly. The diameter was higher and the strain lower in Dacron patch plasty than in controls; eversion endarterectomy did not differ from controls. The elastic modulus was higher (stiffer) in Dacron patch plasty than in eversion endarterectomy; neither Dacron patch plasty nor eversion endarterectomy differed significantly from controls. The stiffness index was not significantly different between the groups. Turbulence was present in Dacron patch plasty and eversion endarterectomy when compared with controls.

CONCLUSION

In diameter, strain and stiffness, the operated carotid artery resembles the non-stenotic, unoperated artery more closely after eversion endarterectomy than after Dacron patch plasty.

Eversion endarterectomy of the internal carotid artery: technique and results in 449 procedures

BACKGROUND

Preservation of neurological function with a low incidence of restenosis is a measure of the long-term durability of carotid endarterectomy. Routine and selective patch angioplasty of the internal carotid artery have both been used to reduce the incidence of restenosis. The European literature has had many reports of lower restenosis rates in patients undergoing eversion carotid endarterectomy. We evaluated our experience with the eversion carotid endarterectomy procedure over a 2-year period to identify any advantage of this technique.

METHODS

Between August 1993 and August 1995, 376 patients underwent 449 carotid endarterectomies (CEAs) using the eversion technique (described below). During the same period, 307 patients underwent 353 CEAs by standard endarterectomy. Demographics were similar in both groups. Fifty-two patients in the eversion group underwent combined open cardiac procedures and carotid endarterectomy. There were 47 such patients in the standard group. Duplex examination was performed after surgery at regular intervals to identify any recurrent stenosis.

RESULTS

Operative mortality was 4 of 376 (1.1%) and 6 of 307 (2%) in the eversion and standard groups, respectively. Shunts were used in 15 of 449 patients in the eversion group and 24 of 353 patients in the standard group. Cervical block anesthesia was used in 669 of 687 (97%) of patients undergoing CEA without coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). There were four permanent neurologic deficits in the eversion group and seven in the standard group, for respective stroke rates of 0.9% and 2%, and there were three transient neurologic deficits in the eversion group and nine in the standard group. There was one (0.2%) restenosis in the eversion group; there were four (1.1%) in the standard group by follow-up duplex scan.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that eversion carotid endarterectomy can be performed with low stroke and mortality rates in the treatment of extracranial carotid occlusive disease. The incidence of restenosis was lower and approached significance in eversion endarterectomy when compared to standard carotid endarterectomy in the short-term follow-up in this series.

Saphenous vein bypass: an alternative to internal carotid reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

Venous grafting is rarely employed for carotid reconstruction; the aim of this retrospective study was to assess its value as an alternative to endarterectomy.

MATERIAL

Between January 1980 and June 1990, we performed 212 carotid artery venous bypasses (CVB) on 208 patients. Twenty-nine patients were asymptomatic, 60 had non-hemispheric symptoms and 119 focal symptoms. The indication for surgery was stenosis in 185 cases, kinking in 18 and aneurysms in nine. The main criteria to use CVB were length of the lesion in 86 cases, extent of atherosclerosis in 75, dysplasia in 12, intraoperative failure of endarterectomy in 21, aneurysms in seven and long-term restenosis or occlusion in 12.

RESULTS

There were 11 deaths, three strokes and nine transient ischaemic attacks. Angiographic control showed one occlusion giving an immediate patency rate of 99.5%. Mean follow-up was 104.3 +/- 46.1 months with 15 patients lost to follow-up. Eighty patients died; life expectancy was 52.4 +/- 7.5 at 10 years. Including occlusions and restenosis as failures, the secondary patency rate was 96.4 +/- 3.7 at 10 years. The annual stroke rate was 1.3% and the neurologic event-free-population 87 +/- 2.4% at 10 years.

CONCLUSION

CVB is a valuable alternative to endarterectomy for reconstruction of the carotid artery. The indications are extensive atherosclerosis involving the common carotid artery, intraoperative anatomic failure of endarterectomy, and long-term restenosis.

Eversion endarterectomy of the internal carotid artery: midterm results of a new technique

A new eversion endarterectomy technique was used in 65 internal carotid artery reconstructions in 56 patients. The original features of the technique include a complete oblique transection of the internal carotid artery distal to the lesion and eversion endarterectomy through a longitudinal incision of the common carotid and external carotid arteries. The mean age of the patients was 68.2 +/- 7.8 years. Seventy-three percent of the patients had hypertension and 45.5% had coronary heart disease. Fifty-four percent experienced neurologic symptoms (transient in 36%, reversible in 6%, and permanent in 11%). Operations were performed under general anesthesia. An indwelling shunt was inserted whenever routine stump pressure was < 50 mmHg. There were no neurologic complications but one patient died of a compression hematoma of the neck, for a combined mortality and morbidity rate of 1.5%. Arteriograms were obtained from all patients on day 5 and showed complete restoration of normal anatomy in all cases and thrombosis of the external carotid artery in one. During a mean follow-up of 27 +/- 4.7 months no strokes were observed. Follow-up duplex scans showed no hemodynamically significant restenoses. Eversion endarterectomy is a reliable alternative to other reconstruction procedures of the internal carotid artery.

Carotid eversion endarterectomy: short- and long-term results

From January 1979 to December 1993, of 2723 carotid revascularizations performed on our service, 168 (6.2%) were isolated carotid eversion endarterectomies (CEEs) for atherosclerotic occlusive disease. Since 10 of these procedures were bilateral, there were 158 patients total (88 men and 70 women). Twenty-six (16.5%) had diabetes, 54 (34.2%) had coronary disease, and 107 (67.7%) had hypertension. The mean age was 68.9 +/- 8.9 years (range 38 and 85 years). Preoperative ischemic symptoms were hemispheric in 93 (55.4%) patients, retinal in 31 (18.4%), and vertebrobasilar in 37 (22%). They consisted of one or more strokes in 44 (26.2%) patients and one or more transient ischemic attacks in 99 (58.9%); 25 (14.9%) patients were asymptomatic. The operated lesion contained atherosclerotic stenotic plaque in all cases. The lesion was tightly stenotic (> 75%) and hemodynamically significant in 93 (55.4%) cases and irregular or ulcerated in all others. In 86 (51.2%) patients a coil or kink of the distal internal carotid artery was also present. The contralateral carotid artery was totally occluded in eight (4.7%) patients and tightly stenotic in seven (4.2%). All patients were operated on under deep general anesthesia; they were given systemic heparin and normal blood pressure was maintained. After freeing and cross-clamping of the carotid bifurcation, the end of the common carotid artery or the ostium of the internal carotid artery was sectioned. The section allowed a deep-plane endarterectomy through eversion and excellent control over the endarterectomized surface and its extremities. Since January 1989 completion arteriography has been routinely performed after CEE.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)