Does routine patch angioplasty after carotid endarterectomy lessen the risk of perioperative stroke?

Current Management of Extracranial Carotid Artery Disease

Stroke is the third most common cause of death in the United States. There are approximately 700,000 strokes/year; 80% are ischemic, and 20-30% of ischemic strokes are secondary to carotid disease. Carotid stenosis is traditionally treated by carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Multicenter, randomized, controlled trials have shown that surgery significantly reduces the risk of ipsilateral stroke in patients with severe symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Endovascular techniques for treating carotid stenosis have been developed over recent years. Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) with cerebral protection has become an alternative to CEA for high-surgical-risk patients and the procedure of choice for stenoses inaccessible by surgery. In this review we summarize the existing data regarding the traditional state of management of extracranial carotid artery stenosis and compare these data to a critical analysis of the recent results of CAS.

Long-term Comparative Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting Following Previous Carotid Endarterectomy vs De Novo Lesions

PURPOSE

To report the long-term outcomes of patients who underwent carotid artery stenting (CAS) for de novo carotid stenosis vs patients treated for restenosis after carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of all 385 patients (mean age 68.6±9.6 years; 231 men) who underwent 435 CAS procedures at a large tertiary care center between January 1999 and December 2013. For analysis, patients were stratified based on their lesion type [de novo (dn) vs post-CEA restenosis (res)] and subclassified by symptoms status [symptomatic (Sx) or asymptomatic (Asx)], creating 4 groups: (1) CAS-dn Asx, (2) CAS-dn Sx, (3) CAS-res Asx, and (4) CAS-res Sx. For the CAS-res group, the mean elapsed time from CEA to CAS was 72.4±63.6 months. Outcomes included target vessel reintervention (TVR) and in-stent restenosis (ISR), the latter defined by a carotid duplex ultrasound velocity >275 cm/s.

RESULTS

The main indication for initial carotid angiography with possible revascularization was severe carotid stenosis (≥70%-99% on duplex) in both CAS-dn and CAS-res groups (83.6% vs 83.7%, p=0.999). There were no significant differences in the percentage of patients with postintervention residual stenosis (<30%; 100% each arm) or complications between CAS-res vs CAS-dn: in-hospital stroke (1.4% vs 1.8%, respectively), myocardial infarction (0.9% vs 0%), or death (0.9% vs 0%). Mean follow-up was 62.4±45.6 months (median 53.5, range 1-180). Average clinical/TVR follow-up was greater for the CAS-res group (71.9±48.6 months) compared with 53.3±40.5 months for the CAS-dn group (p<0.001). Across the 4 study groups, there were no differences in freedom from ISR (p=0.174) or TVR (p=0.856). Multivariate analysis found peripheral vascular disease (PVD) as the sole ISR independent predictor [hazard ratio (HR) 1.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03 to 3.62, p=0.041], while significant predictors for TVR were age <65 years at the time of the procedure (HR 2.55, 95% CI 1.05 to 6.18, p=0.039) and PVD (HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.03 to 5.87, p=0.043).

CONCLUSION

The current study suggests that CAS is a feasible and durable therapeutic option for recurrent restenosis after CEA. Long-term outcomes were similar for patients treated for de novo lesions or post-CEA restenosis. Age and PVD appear to influence long-term CAS durability.

Primary Closure After a Carotid Endarterectomy

PURPOSE

The prevalences of restenosis and stroke after a carotid endarterectomy (CEA) tend to differ substantially according to the surgeon. Primary closure after a CEA was the routine procedure in our institute. The primary objectives of this study were to compare the results of patients of a primary arteriotomy closure in CEA between our own and others' results based on the findings in the literature.

METHODS

One hundred and sixty-six patients who underwent a primary closure were analyzed. Perioperative neurologic deficits were determined by the neurologist. Restenosis was defined as >50% stenosis on duplex scan. The range of follow-up was 7-112 months.

RESULTS

Stroke including transient ischemic attack occurred within 30 postoperative days in 3 patients and after 30 postoperative days in 1 of the 166 patients. Five patients showed >50% asymptomatic restenosis. Two patients were treated with stent insertion and one underwent reoperation. One patient showed total occlusion during the follow-up period without any neurological deficits. One patient showed 50%-70% stenosis, and no intervention was done.

CONCLUSIONS

The rates of recurrent stenosis and postoperative stroke were found to be sufficiently low following a primary closure to justify the continued use of this technique.

Primary closure of the carotid artery is associated with poorer outcomes during carotid endarterectomy

INTRODUCTION

Arterial endarterectomy and reconstruction during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can be performed in a variety of ways, including standard endarterectomy with primary closure, standard endarterectomy with patch angioplasty, and eversion endarterectomy. The optimal method of arterial reconstruction remains a matter of controversy. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of the method of arterial reconstruction during CEA on perioperative outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of consecutive CEAs performed by 81 surgeons during 1997 and 1998 in six regional hospitals was performed. Detailed clinical data regarding each case and all deaths and nonfatal strokes within 30 days of surgery were ascertained by an independent review of the inpatient chart, outpatient surgeon record, and the hospitals' administrative databases. Two physician investigators--one neurologist and one internist--confirmed each adverse event by independently reviewing patients' medical records.

RESULTS

A total of 1972 CEAs were performed. The mean age of the patients was 72.3 years, and 57.2% were male. Preoperative neurologic symptoms occurred in 28.7% of cases (n = 566), and the remaining 71.3% were asymptomatic before surgery (n = 1406). The method of arterial reconstruction was chosen by the surgeon. Primary closure was performed in 11.8% (n = 233), patch angioplasty in 69.8% (n = 1377), and eversion endarterectomy in 18.4% (n = 362). There was no significant difference in the preoperative symptom status of patients who underwent primary closure compared with the other methods of reconstruction (72.5% asymptomatic vs 71.1%, p = NS). Primary closure cases were significantly more likely to experience perioperative stroke compared with the other closure techniques (5.6% vs 2.2%, P = .006). Primary closure cases also had a higher incidence of perioperative stroke or death compared with the other closure techniques (6.0% vs 2.5%, P = .006). There were no significant differences with regard to either perioperative stroke, or perioperative stroke/death noted when comparing patch angioplasty with eversion endarterectomy: stroke, 2.2% vs 2.5% (P = NS) and stroke/death, 2.5% vs 2.5% (P = NS) respectively.

CONCLUSION

It appears that primary closure is associated with significantly worse perioperative outcomes compared with endarterectomy with patch angioplasty and eversion endarterectomy, even when the preoperative symptom status of the patient cohorts is equivalent. Although some of its advocates have reported that they can properly select appropriate patients for primary closure based on the size of the artery and other factors, the data demonstrate that these patients have poorer outcomes nonetheless. Primary closure during carotid endarterectomy should predominantly be abandoned in favor of either standard endarterectomy with patch angioplasty or eversion endarterectomy.

Sequential cohort study of Dacron patch closure following carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Carotid endarterectomy reduces the risk of stroke and death in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis. This study examined whether the technique used to close the arteriotomy influenced the rate of perioperative transient ischaemic attack (TIA), stroke or death.

METHODS

A cohort of 236 patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy at a single centre was studied; 117 patients had primary closure of the arteriotomy and 119 patients in a sequential series had closure with a Dacron patch. A standard endarterectomy with completion intraoperative duplex imaging and digital subtraction angiography was used throughout.

RESULTS

Patch closure was associated with a significant reduction in the 30-day combined death, stroke and TIA rate: 10.3 per cent for primary closure versus 2.5 per cent for patch closure (P = 0.017). The risk of any cerebral event (stroke or TIA) was also significantly reduced (7.7 versus 1.7 per cent; P = 0.033). Residual stenosis on completion angiography was more common after primary closure (24.6 versus 7.4 per cent; P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Dacron patch closure had a higher technical success rate on completion imaging and was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of perioperative stroke, TIA and death.

Prospective randomized trial of carotid endarterectomy with polytetrafluoroethylene versus collagen-impregnated dacron (Hemashield) patching: late follow-up

OBJECTIVE

To compare the late clinical outcome and incidence of recurrent stenosis after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) versus Hemashield patching.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Several randomized trials have confirmed the advantages of patching over primary closure when performing CEA.

METHODS

Two hundred CEAs (180 patients) were randomized into 100 with PTFE patching and 100 with Hemashield. All patients underwent postoperative color duplex ultrasounds at 1, 6, and 12 months, and every year thereafter. The mean follow-up was 26 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the risk of re-stenosis, stroke, and stroke-free survival. A multivariate analysis of various risk factors was also done.

RESULTS

Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar in both groups. The incidence of all ipsilateral strokes (early and late) was 8% (7% perioperative) for Hemashield versus 0% for PTFE patching. Both groups had similar mortality rates. The cumulative stroke-free rates at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months were 93%, 93%, 93%, and 89% for Hemashield versus 100%, 100%, 100%, and 100% for PTFE patching. The cumulative stroke-free survival rates at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months were 90%, 89%, 87%, and 79% for Hemashield versus 98%, 98%, 92%, and 92% for PTFE patching. Kaplan-Meier analysis also showed that freedom from 50% or greater re-stenosis at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months was 89%, 81%, 73%, and 66% for Hemashield versus 100%, 100%, 100%, and 92% for PTFE. Similarly, the freedom from 70% or greater re-stenosis at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months was 93%, 91%, 86%, and 78% for Hemashield versus 100%, 100%, 100%, and 100% for PTFE. Univariate and multivariate analyses of demographic and preoperative risk factors showed that only Hemashield was significantly associated with a higher incidence of 70% or greater recurrent stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

PTFE patching was superior to Hemashield in lowering the incidence of postoperative ipsilateral strokes and late recurrent stenosis.

A prospective, randomized study of saphenous vein patching versus synthetic patching during carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was the determination of whether the choice of either autogenous saphenous vein (ASV) or synthetic material for patch angioplasty significantly influences the results after carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

METHODS

With Institutional Review Board approval, 195 patients (145 men and 50 women; mean age, 69 years) who underwent 207 CEAs were prospectively randomized to arteriotomy closure with ASV or synthetic patches from July 1996 to January 2000. One hundred and one patients (52%) were randomized to the ASV cohort, and 94 (48%) were randomized to the synthetic cohort. Aside from a slight gender imbalance (70% versus 79% male in the ASV versus the synthetic group), there were no clinically important differences in baseline demographic variables, risk factors, or surgical indications between the ASV and synthetic groups.

RESULTS

With all 207 randomized procedures on an intent-to-treat basis, there were two early (<30 days) postoperative deaths (1%). There were three perioperative strokes in the ASV cohort (3.0%) and two in the synthetic cohort (2.1%; P =.99). Two of these early strokes occurred in a subset of nine patients who received neither patch material, all after randomization but before CEA. Two patients in each group had late strokes. The cumulative freedom from stroke rate at 1 year (ASV, 94%; synthetic, 95%) was virtually identical for both cohorts. With the 125 patients who had at least one postoperative duplex scan, the incidence rate of recurrent (>or=60%) carotid stenosis was 4.8% (three of 62) for the ASV group and 6.3% (four of 63) for the synthetic group (P =.99).

CONCLUSION

No significant differences in the stroke, mortality, or restenosis rates were shown between the ASV and the synthetic cohorts. While conceding the power limitations inherent in this study, we conclude that CEA may be safely performed with similar early results with ASV or synthetic patches.

Management of Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Review

Carotid endarterectomy clearly benefits high stroke-risk patients, but its value for asymptomatic patients is still being debated. If a high exposure is necessary for redo procedures or distal aneurysms, mandibular subluxation and styloidectomy may be required. Perioperative mortality and morbidity are acceptably low. Restenosis occurs in few patients.http://link.springer-ny.com/link/service/journals/00547/bibs/8n3p139.html

Duplex imaging findings predict stenosis after carotid endarterectomy

PURPOSE

This study was performed to determine whether early duplex findings predicted restenosis after carotid endarterectomy.

METHODS

One hundred ninety-two symptomatic patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy were studied with color duplex imaging at 1 day and 1 week after surgery to identify minor residual disease (causing < 50% stenosis), arterial kinking, and suture stricture, and to measure the external and luminal diameters of the carotid bulb and distal internal carotid artery. Patients were then observed prospectively with duplex surveillance for a median of 24 months to identify > 50% restenosis.

RESULTS

Twenty-five stenoses > 50% of the operated carotid artery (13%) were identified, four at 1 day (residual) and 21 at a median follow-up of 6 months (restenosis). On multiple logistic regression analysis, > 50% restenosis was found to be associated with minor day-1 residual stenosis (p = 0.01) and with small luminal diameter of the distal internal carotid artery (p = 0.03) as measured 1 week after carotid endarterectomy. Life table analysis showed restenosis at 24 months to be more common for patients with below-median than patients with above-median carotid bulb external diameter (18% vs 5%, respectively; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Duplex scanning within a week of carotid endarterectomy identifies > 50% residual stenosis, in addition to minor residual 25% to 50% stenosis and small carotid dimensions, which are good predictors of > 50% restenosis at 6 months.

Complications resulting from saphenous vein patch graft after carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVE

Reducing surgical risks to the minimum in carotid endarterectomy has become crucial, especially with the results of recent clinical trials extending indications to asymptomatic patients. The use of the saphenous vein patch graft (SVPG) has been suggested to reduce early postoperative thrombosis and cerebral infarct as well as late recurrent stenosis. However, the exact risks and complications involved in this technique are not known.

METHODS

During a 23-year period (1972-1994), 2888 carotid endarterectomies with SVPG for primary carotid stenosis were performed by the Neurosurgical Cerebrovascular Service at the Mayo Clinic. The data from all patients were retrospectively analyzed, emphasizing postoperative complications related to SVPG.

RESULTS

There were five postoperative vein ruptures (0.17%), four cases of aneurysm formation, and three cases of deep infection necessitating surgical intervention. The vein patch ruptured in one male patient and four female patients (mean age, 69 yr). All ruptures occurred within 4 days of the primary operation, including two during the first 24 hours. All patients with rupture underwent emergency surgery and were found to have intact suture lines and tears in the middle of the grafts. Two patients recovered without deficits, one suffered major disability, and the other two died. Aneurysm of the patch developed in two male patients and two female patients (mean age, 71 yr). All of the patients developed painless pulsatile neck masses 1 to 9 years after the initial surgery; two also had recurrent ischemic symptoms. All of the patients with aneurysms underwent surgical correction without consequences.

CONCLUSION

Although the benefit of routine use of SVPG in carotid endarterectomy is still the focus of debate, this analysis showed that its use adds a small but definite risk of serious complications related to inherent weakness of the venous tissue. If a surgeon chooses to use a patch graft, our recommendation is for use of a synthetic material rather than vein.

Acute platelet deposition after carotid endarterectomy in sheep: vein patch compared with gelatin-sealed Dacron and polytetrafluoroethylene patch closure

PURPOSE

Patch angioplasty is commonly used to close the arteriotomy after carotid endarterectomy is performed. The purpose of this study was to determine whether any significant variations were present in platelet deposition for different patch sizes and materials.

METHOD

The study measured 111-indium-labeled uptake in the sheep to compare thrombus deposition for three different patch materials: autologous vein, gelatin-sealed Dacron, and polytetrafluoroethylene and for 6- and 12-mm patch widths. Platelet uptake was measured on the patch itself and on the artery wall that was opposite to the patch and that had undergone endarterectomy. Scanning electron microscopy was used to confirm the localization of the labeled platelets on the patch and on the surface that had undergone endarterectomy.

RESULTS

Although considerable variation was seen among animals, platelet accumulation was lowest in the vein patches compared with the prosthetic patches (p < 0.01), but the deposition on the gelatine-sealed Dacron was not significantly different from that on polytetrafluoroethylene patches. Platelet deposition on the artery wall that had undergone endarterectomy was considerably less than on the patch but was higher when a synthetic patch was used rather than a vein patch (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Acute thrombus deposition after carotid endarterectomy was considerably less for vein patch closure than for synthetic patches. A 6-mm patch width caused less thrombus deposition both on the patch itself and on the artery wall compared with a 12-mm patch, but the difference was proportional to the patch width.

Outcome of selective patching following carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVES

Routine patch angioplasty has been advocated following carotid endarterectomy but patching can be associated with complications. This study assesses the effect of a selective patching policy based on distal internal carotid diameter on the rate of restenosis and outcome following carotid endarterectomy.

DESIGN, MATERIAL AND METHODS

A consecutive series of 213 patients underwent carotid endarterectomy performed by one surgeon. Preoperative carotid dimensions were measured intraoperatively using calipers. Following endarterectomy a 5mm Dacron patch was selectively employed if the distal internal carotid was 5mm or less (group 1, 95 patients) or 6mm or less (group 2, 118 patients). Patients underwent colour-coded Duplex scanning at 24 h, 1 week, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, and yearly following this.

RESULTS

Overall 27 restenoses (5 residual) of 50% or greater and two occlusions developed. Patching was performed in 47% of group 1 and 61% of group 2 arteries. In group 1 14% of patched compared with 24% of non-patched arteries developed restenosis at 24 months (p=0.4). In group 2 13% of patched compared to 11% of non-patched arteries developed restenosis at 12 months (p>0.5). Stroke rate at 24 months were similar for patched and non-patched patients in groups 1 (p>0.5) and 2 (p=0.4).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that patch angioplasty of larger carotid arteries may be unnecessary. Randomisation of larger arteries between patch and primary closure would be required to confirm this.