Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in patients requiring hospitalization

The burden of respiratory syncytial virus in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most common pathogen associated with acute lower respiratory tract infections in young children. RSV is also a major viral pathogen causing severe lung disease in the adult population, particularly among the elderly. We conducted a review of adult RSV studies published from January 1970 to February 2017 to determine the burden of disease among adults worldwide. There were no restrictions on health care setting or definition of RSV infection. A total of 1530 published studies were identified, 95 of which were included in this review. The incidence rates of hospitalised RSV acute respiratory tract infection (ARI) in adults >65 years old ranged from 7.3 to 13.0/10⁵ population in Africa and Asia and from 190 to 254/10⁵ population in the USA. Higher incidence rates (195–1790/10⁵ population) were observed in adults ≥50 years old for outpatient or emergency visits in the USA. Of all ARI patients, RSV accounted for 1–10% in adults and 2–14% in patients with chronic diseases or transplantation. Given the limitations in the existing data, significant efforts should be made to generate evidence on the burden of RSV infections in adults and to estimate the potential impact of future preventive interventions.

Synergistic Antimicrobial Effects of Cefabronchin®

Antibiotic resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae has risen to worrying levels in the past few decades worldwide, and subsequently, effective treatment of respiratory tract infections has become even more challenging. While the need to develop new strategies to combat bacterial infections is urgent, novel antibiotic compounds are no longer a priority of the pharmaceutical industry. However, resistance-modifying agents can alleviate the spread of antibiotic resistance and render existing antibiotics effective again. In the present study, we aimed to determine the combinatory antimicrobial effects of the commercial herbal product Cefabronchin^® and antibiotic compounds, such as amoxicillin and clarithromycin, on 6 clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae. Therefore, the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of each agent before and after adding Cefabronchin^® at different concentrations was determined by applying the checkerboard method. Sub-inhibitory concentrations of the added Cefabronchin^® were found to reduce the MIC down to between 3.4% and 29.2% of the amoxicillin MIC and down to between 10.4% and 45.8% of the clarithromycin MIC in all 6 strains. In conclusion, this study provides evidence for the improved antimicrobial effects of commonly used antibiotics in combination with Cefabronchin^® in order to combat infections with antibiotic-resistant S. pneumoniae strains.

Testing for Respiratory Viruses in Adults With Severe Lower Respiratory Infection

Viral pathogens are a common cause of severe lower respiratory tract infection in adults. Our ability to rapidly and accurately identify viral infections has dramatically improved as slow culture-based techniques have been largely replaced by multiplex high-throughput systems. Given these advances, reevaluation of the role of respiratory viral testing in adults presenting with lower respiratory tract infection is important. This article reviews the potential benefits of testing, provides an overview of the most commonly used diagnostic techniques, and considers whether current evidence supports routine testing.

Management of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent adults: updated Swedish guidelines 2017

Based on expert group work, Swedish recommendations for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults are here updated. The management of sepsis-induced hypotension is addressed in detail, including monitoring and parenteral therapy. The importance of respiratory support in cases of acute respiratory failure is emphasized. Treatment with high-flow oxygen and non-invasive ventilation is recommended. The use of statins or steroids in general therapy is not found to be fully supported by evidence. In the management of pleural infection, new data show favourable effects of tissue plasminogen activator and deoxyribonuclease installation. Detailed recommendations for the vaccination of risk groups are afforded.

Swedish guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent adults--Swedish Society of Infectious Diseases 2012

This document presents the 2012 evidence based guidelines of the Swedish Society of Infectious Diseases for the in- hospital management of adult immunocompetent patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The prognostic score 'CRB-65' is recommended for the initial assessment of all CAP patients, and should be regarded as an aid for decision-making concerning the level of care required, microbiological investigation, and antibiotic treatment. Due to the favourable antibiotic resistance situation in Sweden, an initial narrow-spectrum antibiotic treatment primarily directed at Streptococcus pneumoniae is recommended in most situations. The recommended treatment for patients with severe CAP (CRB-65 score 2) is penicillin G in most situations. In critically ill patients (CRB-65 score 3-4), combination therapy with cefotaxime/macrolide or penicillin G/fluoroquinolone is recommended. A thorough microbiological investigation should be undertaken in all patients, including blood cultures, respiratory tract sampling, and urine antigens, with the addition of extensive sampling for more uncommon respiratory pathogens in the case of severe disease. Recommended measures for the prevention of CAP include vaccination for influenza and pneumococci, as well as smoking cessation.

Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections--full version

This document is an update of Guidelines published in 2005 and now includes scientific publications through to May 2010. It provides evidence-based recommendations for the most common management questions occurring in routine clinical practice in the management of adult patients with LRTI. Topics include management outside hospital, management inside hospital (including community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD), acute exacerbations of bronchiectasis) and prevention. Background sections and graded evidence tables are also included. The target audience for the Guideline is thus all those whose routine practice includes the management of adult LRTI.

Definite, probable, and possible bacterial aetiologies of community-acquired pneumonia at different CRB-65 scores

According to the recommendations of the Swedish Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) guidelines, the selection of empirical antibiotic therapy should be based on the CRB-65 rule. The guidelines recommend empirical therapy directed predominantly against Streptococcus pneumoniae for patients with low CRB-65 scores and broad-spectrum therapy for patients with high CRB-65 scores. In order to study the utility of the recommendations, we analyzed the data from an aetiological study previously performed on 235 hospitalized adult CAP patients at our medical centre. A definite, probable, or possible bacterial aetiology was noted in 194 cases (83%), including 112 cases (48%) with S. pneumoniae aetiology. The following frequencies of definite-probable aetiologies were noted in the patients with CRB-65 score 0-1 (n=155) and CRB-65 score 2-4 (n=80): S. pneumoniae 30% and 35%, Haemophilus influenzae 6.5% and 14% (p=0.063), Mycoplasma pneumoniae 15% and 5.0% (p=0.019), Chlamydophila species 2.6% and 1.2%, Legionella pneumophila 1.9% and 0%, and Staphylococcus aureus 1.3% and 1.2%, respectively. The high frequency of S. pneumoniae in the study supports the recommendations to predominantly cover this bacterium in the empirical therapy of patients with low CRB-65 scores. In the case of treatment failure in these patients, the study indicates that coverage against M. pneumoniae and H. influenzae should be considered.

Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia revisited within the German Competence Network for Community-acquired pneumonia (CAPNETZ)

BACKGROUND

Currently, broad empiric antimicrobial treatment including atypical coverage is recommended for patients with mild to moderate community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Therefore, the relative impact of each atypical pathogen, particularly Mycoplasma pneumoniae deserves renewed attention.

METHODS

Based on prospective data from 4532 patients with CAP included in the German CAP-Competence Network (CAPNETZ), we studied the incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcome of patients with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (MPP). The diagnosis of MPP was based on a positive PCR from respiratory samples and/or a positive IgM-titer from an acute phase serum sample.

RESULTS

307 patients (6.8%) had definite MPP (148 with positive PCR, 204 with positive IgM, 46 with positive PCR and IgM). Compared to patients with other definite and unknown etiologies, patients with MPP were significantly younger (41 +/- 16 versus 62 +/- 17 and 61 +/- 18 years), had fewer co-morbidities, presented with a less severe disease, showed a lower inflammatory response in terms of leukocyte counts (median 8850 versus 13200 and 11000 microL) and CRP values (60 versus 173 and 73 mg/L), and had better outcomes, including a shorter length of hospitalization (9 +/- 5 versus 14 +/- 11 and 12 +/- 9 days), fewer patients requiring mechanical ventilation (0.3 versus 4.5 and 2.1%), and a minimal mortality (0.7 versus 8.7 and 6.5%).

CONCLUSION

In this large series of patients with definite MPP according to very strict criteria, MPP appears as a condition with a high incidence, quite specific clinical presentation, and a largely benign course. In view of a widely favorable clinical outcome, recent recommendations including regular coverage of atypical pathogens in patients with mild to moderate CAP might be reconsidered for patients in Germany as well as in other countries with comparable epidemiological settings.

The etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in Australia: why penicillin plus doxycycline or a macrolide is the most appropriate therapy

BACKGROUND

Available data on the etiology of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in Australia are very limited. Local treatment guidelines promote the use of combination therapy with agents such as penicillin or amoxycillin combined with either doxycycline or a macrolide.

METHODS

The Australian CAP Study (ACAPS) was a prospective, multicenter study of 885 episodes of CAP in which all patients underwent detailed assessment for bacterial and viral pathogens (cultures, urinary antigen testing, serological methods, and polymerase chain reaction). Antibiotic agents and relevant clinical outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

The etiology was identified in 404 (45.6%) of 885 episodes, with the most frequent causes being Streptococcus pneumoniae (14%), Mycoplasma pneumoniae (9%), and respiratory viruses (15%; influenza, picornavirus, respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus, and adenovirus). Antibiotic-resistant pathogens were rare: only 5.4% of patients had an infection for which therapy with penicillin plus doxycycline would potentially fail. Concordance with local antibiotic recommendations was high (82.4%), with the most commonly prescribed regimens being a penicillin plus either doxycycline or a macrolide (55.8%) or ceftriaxone plus either doxycycline or a macrolide (36.8%). The 30-day mortality rate was 5.6% (50 of 885 episodes), and mechanical ventilation or vasopressor support were required in 94 episodes (10.6%). Outcomes were not compromised by receipt of narrower-spectrum beta-lactams, and they did not differ on the basis of whether a pathogen was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The vast majority of patients with CAP can be treated successfully with narrow-spectrum beta-lactam treatment, such as penicillin combined with doxycycline or a macrolide. Greater use of such therapy could potentially reduce the emergence of antibiotic resistance among common bacterial pathogens.

Swedish guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent adults

This document presents the evidence-based guidelines of the Swedish Society of Infectious Diseases for the management of adult immunocompetent patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), who are assessed at hospital. The prognostic score 'CURB-65' is recommended for all CAP patients in the emergency room. The score provides an assessment tool for the decision regarding outpatient treatment or level of hospital supervision, the choice of microbiological investigations, and empirical antibiotic treatment. In patients with non-severe CAP (CURB-65 score 0-2) we recommend initial narrow-spectrum antibiotic treatment, orally or intravenously, primarily directed at Streptococcus pneumoniae. In those with CURB-65 score 3, penicillin G or a cephalosporin intravenously is recommended. For CURB-65 score 0-3 atypical pathogens should be covered only when they are suspected on clinical or epidemiological grounds. In patients with CURB-65 score 4-5 intravenous combination therapy with either cephalosporin/macrolide or penicillin G/fluoroquinolone is recommended. Efforts should be made to identify the CAP aetiology in order to support the ongoing antibiotic treatment or to suggest treatment alterations. Recommended measures for prevention of CAP include influenza -- and pneumococcal -- vaccination to risk groups and efforts for smoking cessation.

Epidemiology of community-acquired pneumonia in adult patients at the dawn of the 21st century: a prospective study on the Mediterranean coast of Spain

This study presents data from a prospective study of adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Of 493 patients included in the study, 223 (45.2%) were aged > or = 65 years, and 265 (53.7%) had one or more underlying diseases, mostly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus or dementia. In total, 281 microorganisms were identified in 250 (50.7%) patients, with two or more pathogens detected in 28 (5.7%) cases. Microbial diagnosis varied according to age, severity, co-morbidity and site-of-care, but there was much overlap among groups. Streptococcus pneumoniae was the single most prevalent organism in outpatients, patients admitted to hospital, and patients who died, either as a single pathogen or combined with another organism. Infections caused by 'atypical' pathogens were seen across all groups, including the elderly and patients with co-morbidities. Mortality varied according to the pneumonia severity index (PSI) of the pneumonia patient outcomes research team. Shock (OR 34.48), an age of > 65 years (OR 25) and altered mental status (OR 9.92) were factors associated independently with 30-day mortality. Key findings from this study were the advanced age of the population with CAP, and the high prevalence of dementia as an underlying disease. The study also revealed that microbiological diagnosis of CAP remains problematic. Although certain epidemiological features may help to predict the microbial aetiology, the overlap among groups reduces the usefulness of this information in guiding therapeutic decisions. Greater effort should be made to improve identification methods for microbial pathogens causing CAP.

Community-acquired pneumonia of mixed etiology: prevalence, clinical characteristics, and outcome

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) of mixed etiology has increasingly been appreciated in the literature, but its clinical significance remains unknown. The aim of this analysis was to describe the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and outcome of CAP of mixed etiology. Data were obtained from a 2-year prospective study of consecutive patients with CAP in whom an extensive microbiological workup was performed. Predefined strict criteria were used to establish the etiology. A total of 493 patients were included. A single pathogen was detected in 222 (45%) cases and two or more pathogens in 28 (5.7%) cases. Mixed infections were seen across all age groups and in patients treated both in hospital and as outpatients. The most frequent combinations of pathogens were those of a bacterium plus an "atypical" organism (28.6%) and of two bacterial organisms (28.6%). Compared with patients with monomicrobial pneumonia, patients with mixed pneumonia were more likely to have underlying conditions (64% vs. 45%, p=0.04) and dementia (25% vs. 10%, p=0.02). The incidence of a defined series of complications was higher in patients with mixed pneumonia (39.3% vs. 18.6%; OR=2.84; p=0.02). Community-acquired pneumonia of mixed etiology is uncommon. Patients with mixed pneumonia are more likely to have underlying medical conditions, and they may have a more severe course of disease.

Microbial etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in the adult population of 4 municipalities in eastern Finland

To determine the etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in the adult population of a defined area, specific antibody responses in paired serum samples, levels of circulating pneumococcal immune complexes in serum samples, and pneumococcal antigen in urine were measured. Samples (304 paired serum samples and 300 acute urine samples) were obtained from 345 patients > or =15 years old with community-acquired, radiologically confirmed pneumonia, which comprised all cases in the population of 4 municipalities in eastern Finland during 1 year. Specific infecting organisms were identified in 183 patients (including 49 with mixed infection), as follows: Streptococcus pneumoniae, 125 patients; Haemophilus influenzae, 12; Moraxella catarrhalis, 8; chlamydiae, 37 (of which, Chlamydia pneumoniae, 30); Mycoplasma pneumoniae, 30; and virus species, 27. The proportion of patients with pneumococcal infections increased and of those with Mycoplasma infections decreased with age, but for each age group, the etiologic profile was similar among inpatients and among outpatients. S. pneumoniae was the most important etiologic agent. The annual incidence of pneumococcal pneumonia per 1000 inhabitants aged > or =60 years was 8.0.

Community-acquired pneumonia. A prospective outpatient study

We initiated a prospective study with a group of practitioners to assess the etiology, clinical presentation, and outcome of community-acquired pneumonia in patients diagnosed in the outpatient setting. All patients with signs and symptoms suggestive of pneumonia and an infiltrate on chest X-ray underwent an extensive standard workup and were followed over 4 weeks. Over a 4-year period, 184 patients were eligible, of whom 170 (age range, 15-96 yr; median, 43 yr) were included and analyzed. In 78 (46%), no etiologic agent could be demonstrated. In the remaining 92 patients, 107 etiologic agents were implicated: 43 were due to "pyogenic" bacteria (39 Streptococcus pneumoniae, 3 Haemophilus spp., 1 Streptococcus spp.), 39 were due to "atypical" bacteria (24 Mycoplasma pneumoniae, 9 Chlamydia pneumoniae, 4 Coxiella burnetii, 2 Legionella spp.), and 25 were due to viruses (20 influenza viruses and 5 other respiratory viruses). There were only a few statistically significant clinical differences between the different etiologic categories (higher age and comorbidities in viral or in episodes of undetermined etiology, higher neutrophil counts in "pyogenic" episodes, more frequent bilateral and interstitial infiltrates in viral episodes). There were 2 deaths, both in patients with advanced age (83 and 86 years old), and several comorbidities. Only 14 patients (8.2%) required hospitalization. In 6 patients (3.4%), the pneumonia episode uncovered a local neoplasia. This study shows that most cases of community-acquired pneumonia have a favorable outcome and can be successfully managed in an outpatient setting. Moreover, in the absence of rapid and reliable clinical or laboratory tests to establish a definite etiologic diagnosis at presentation, the spectrum of the etiologic agents suggest that initial antibiotic therapy should cover both S. pneumoniae and atypical bacteria, as well as possible influenza viruses during the epidemic season.

Cost-effectiveness of sparfloxacin compared with other oral antimicrobials in outpatient treatment of community-acquired pneumonia

We examined the cost-effectiveness of sparfloxacin compared with other selected oral antimicrobials in outpatient treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) using clinical pathway-based decision analysis. Cost estimates were obtained from medical claims databases and Medicare reimbursement schedules. Probability estimates were derived from published clinical trials, the medical literature, and clinical expert opinion. Overall adjusted efficacy rates were 89% for sparfloxacin, 79.4% for azithromycin, 77.8% for clarithromycin, 73% for cefaclor, 70.8% for amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, and 69% for erythromycin. The expected total cost/CAP episode of treatment with sparfloxacin was $216.07 compared with $258.97, $297.08, $345.75, $389.80, and $395.93 for azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, and cefaclor, respectively. Therapy with sparfloxacin for managing CAP is cost effective-relative to other commonly prescribed antibiotics, resulting in net cost savings.

A randomized trial of cefepime and ceftazidime for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia

We compared the effectiveness and safety of ceftazidime and cefepime in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. The 148 enrolled patients received 2 g ceftazidime three times daily or 2 g cefepime twice daily. The clinical success rate was the same for both drugs. Even the microbiological effectiveness was similar. Both drug regimens were well tolerated. We conclude that 2 g ceftazidime three times daily were as effective as 2 g cefepime twice daily for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients. The cost of ceftazidime treatment was, however, higher than the cost of cefepime treatment.

Pneumococcal disease in Sweden: experiences and current situation

During the last decade, the incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease in Sweden has risen, seemingly due chiefly to an increasing incidence of pneumococcal bacteremia among the elderly. On the other hand, mortality due to invasive disease in Sweden is low, approximately 10% for bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia. Beta-lactam resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae is still a relatively minor problem in Sweden, with only 3%-4% of strains demonstrating decreased susceptibility to penicillin. However, local outbreaks of pneumococcal disease with up to 10% resistance have occurred among children, especially in southern Sweden.

Incremental effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccine on simultaneously administered influenza vaccine in preventing pneumonia and pneumococcal pneumonia among persons aged 65 years or older

The effectiveness of simultaneously administered influenza and pneumococcal vaccines vs. influenza vaccine alone in preventing pneumonia, pneumococcal pneumonia and pneumococcal bacteraemia among the elderly was studied. The vaccines were offered to all persons aged 65 years or older (N=43,500) living in 35 administrative districts in Northern Finland. A total of 26,925 persons (62%) decided to participate. Allocation to the vaccination groups took place by year of birth (odd/even). The total follow-up of those vaccinated consisted of 38,037 person years. The incremental effectiveness of the pneumococcal vaccine was -20 (95% CI -50- + 10%) for pneumonia, -20 (95% CI -90- + 20%) for pneumococcal pneumonia and + 60% (95% CI -40- +90%) for pneumococcal bacteraemia. Thus the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine did not offer any additional protection from pneumonia among elderly people in Finland although it reduced the incidence of bacteraemia.

Implications for macrolide treatment in community-acquired pneumonia. Hopkins CAP Team

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To identify associated clinical parameters, concurrent respiratory tract infections, and the association between macrolide-based therapy and mortality in patients with community-acquired pneumonia ascribed to atypical.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of prospective, cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Tertiary care hospital.

PATIENTS

Three hundred eighty-five consecutive patients who were admitted to the Johns Hopkins Hospital from November 11, 1990, through November 10, 1991, and treated for community-acquired pneumonia.

RESULTS

An atypical pathogen was identified in 29 of 385 adults (7.5%). A second pathogen was detected in 16 of 29 patients (55.2%) in whom an atypical pathogen was detected, compared with 13 of 137 patients (9.5%) in whom conventional bacterial pathogens were detected (odds ratio, 10.22; 95% confidence interval, 3.7 to 28.8; p<0.0001). During hospitalization, only four patients (13.8%) with detection of an atypical pathogen received at least 7 days of either a macrolide or tetracycline. No patient identified to have an atypical pathogen died. For patients who either provided paired sera or who died, 24 of 197 (12.2%) had atypical pathogens detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite vigorous study methods, atypical pathogens were uncommon in our hospitalized population. A second concurrent respiratory pathogen was identified for most patients with atypical pneumonia. Although macrolide use was rare in this patient population, mortality was zero for patients in whom an atypical pathogen was detected, affirming that macrolide-based therapy need not be routine in the therapeutic management of community-acquired pneumonia.

Community-acquired pneumonia guidelines--an international comparison: a view from Europe

Following an outline that details the pathogens causing community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) identified in studies from Europe, this article reviews the guidelines for the management of CAP in four European countries--France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom. The method behind the development of each document is described, followed by a comparison of the scope of each document. All four documents provide guidelines for the management of two groups of patients--the severely ill and the nonseverely ill patient. A penicillin or macrolide feature for the nonseverely ill and the combination of a third-generation cephalosporin plus a macrolide for the severely ill patient are described in all four guidelines. Despite their different origins and methods, these four guidelines have more similarities than differences--the latter serving to emphasize some of the areas that require further research in this important condition. An important area for research is the impact that these guidelines have on practice and especially on clinical outcomes.

Practical considerations and guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common condition which has a significant mortality. The management of a patient with CAP is centred around assessment and correction of gas exchange and fluid balance together with administration of appropriate antibiotics. Up to 10 different pathogens regularly cause CAP, of which Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most important. These different pathogens cannot be distinguished by clinical features or simple laboratory tests. Microbiological tests are slow and insensitive, so empirical therapy is necessary, at least initially. Accurate assessment of illness severity is the most important factor determining initial management, since this assists the decision of whether to admit the patient to hospital in addition to guiding antibiotic choice and route of administration. Two different approaches to severity assessment are outlined. Our antibiotic recommendation for empirical therapy for the patient managed at home and the previously fit patient admitted to hospital is amoxicillin. Amoxicillin/clavulanate plus a macrolide is our choice for the severely ill previously fit patient and a third-generation cephalosporin plus a macrolide is recommended for the severely ill patient with comorbidity. Alternative pathogens and specific treatment regimens are also described. There may be several causes of treatment failure, and in patients who fail to respond to therapy, it is essential to review all the initial clinical and laboratory information, which if necessary must be repeated.

Recurrence of pneumonia in middle-aged and elderly adults after hospital-treated pneumonia: aetiology and predisposing conditions

In order to investigate the predisposing conditions and aetiologic agents in patients with recurrent pneumonia, we prospectively studied 653 immunocompetent patients, 50-85 years of age, who had been treated in hospital for community-acquired pneumonia. After an average patient follow-up period of 32 months, 11 variables were examined for association with the following end points: death, recurrence of pneumonia and recurrence of pneumococcal pneumonia. During the follow-up period there were 171 episodes of pneumonia in 115 of the 653 patients, and 52 deaths (all causes). Multivariate analysis showed that age, male sex, congestive heart failure and presence of other chronic diseases were significantly associated with higher mortality. Age and chronic pulmonary disease were associated with recurrence of pneumonia. The major aetiologic agents were Streptococcus pneumoniae (26%), Haemophilus influenzae (11%) and Moraxella catarrhalis (6%). We conclude that pneumonia recurrences are common in middle-aged and elderly patients after treatment in hospital for community-acquired pneumonia. The recurrence risk is higher in elderly patients, and in those with chronic pulmonary diseases. Given the prominence of H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis found in the present study, these organisms should always be considered when choosing the initial antibiotic in patients with recurrent pneumonia.

Investigation of a Q-fever outbreak in northern Italy

OBJECTIVES

A study was conducted to evaluate the extent of a Q-fever epidemic through active case finding in the area of Vicenza (north-eastern Italy), and to identify risk factors for Q-fever in this outbreak.

METHODS

1) Descriptive epidemiology; 2) Seroepidemiological survey; 3) Case-control study. 1) Epidemic curve and maps with the location of cases. Identification of the road followed by the flocks of sheep. 2) Cross-sectional study on humans and flocks of sheep tested for anti-Coxiella burnetii antibodies. 3) Cases were defined by the presence of fever > 38 degrees C plus serological confirmation. Controls were 94 apparently healthy individuals attending outpatient facilities for control visits or certification, group-matched by geographical area, age and gender. A standardized questionnaire was administered by trained interviewers. Odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to evaluate risk factors for Q-fever.

RESULTS

A total 58 cases were identified in a 5-month period. Male to female ratio was 2.8:1; mean age was 42 years (range: 20-65 years). Twenty-eight patients (48%) were hospitalized. Fever was accompanied by asthenia (81%), headache (76%), chills (72%), and myalgia and arthralgia (53%); cough was present in 47% of patients. Rx abnormalities were found in 81% of the patients undergoing chest X-ray. Among 111 apparently healthy family members who underwent serological testing, four (3.6%) had antibodies to Coxiella burnetii. Three flocks which passed through the outbreak area between late May and early June were shown to be infected, with prevalence of antibodies ranging between 45 and 53%. The case-control study showed a significant association with exposure to flocks of sheep (Odds ratio = 6.1; 95% CI 2.5, 16.3). Other potential risk factors were not more commonly reported by cases with respect to controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Indirect exposure to flocks of sheep was a determinant of this outbreak of Q-fever. This finding suggests that transmission occurred through inhalation of contaminated airborne particles. The importance of control measures should be stressed in areas traversed by flocks of sheep.

Early recognition of Streptococcus pneumoniae in patients with community-acquired pneumonia

The objective of this study was to assess the predictive value of signs, symptoms, and rapidly available laboratory parameters for pneumococci in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). A prospective study on patients with CAP who were admitted to hospital was conducted. Clinical and laboratory data were collected according to a protocol. Two hundred sixty-eight patients aged 18 years or older, not living in a nursing home or not admitted to hospital within one week of this admission, with a new infiltrate on the chest radiograph consistent with pneumonia were included. According to microbiological and serological tests, patients were allocated to one of two aetiological groups, Streptococcus pneumoniae or "other pathogens". Seventy-three variables were examined for a correlation with one of the aetiological categories by means of univariate and multivariate analysis. The resulting discriminant function was considered a clinical test for which posttest probabilities for pneumococcal pneumonia were calculated. Streptococcus pneumoniae was demonstrated in 79 patients and other pathogens in 83; no pathogens were detectable in 106 patients. The variables "cardiovascular disease", "acute onset", "pleuritic pain", "gram-positive bacteria in the sputum Gram stain", and "leucocyte count" correctly predicted the cause of CAP in 80% of all cases in both groups. Depending on the prevalence of Streptococcus pneumoniae, posttest probabilities for pneumococcal pneumonia were up to 90%. It is concluded that data on history, together with the result of the Gram stain of sputum and the leucocyte count, can help to distinguish Streptococcus pneumoniae from other pathogens causing CAP.

Multiple pathogens in adult patients admitted with community-acquired pneumonia: a one year prospective study of 346 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the causes of community-acquired pneumonia in adult patients admitted to hospital.

METHODS

A prospective study was performed on 346 consecutive adult patients (54% men) of mean (SD) 49.3 (19.5) years (range 17-94) admitted to a university affiliated regional hospital in southern Israel with community-acquired pneumonia over a period of one year. Convalescent serum samples were obtained from 308 patients (89%). The aetiological diagnosis for community-acquired pneumonia was based on positive blood cultures and/or significant changes in antibody titres to Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, respiratory viruses, Coxiella burnetii, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae, and Legionella sp.

RESULTS

The aetiology of community-acquired pneumonia was identified in 279 patients (80.6%). The distribution of causal agents was as follows: S pneumoniae, 148 patients (42.8%); M pneumoniae, 101 (29.2%); C pneumoniae, 62 (17.9%); Legionella sp, 56 (16.2%); respiratory viruses, 35 (10.1%); C burnetii, 20 (5.8%); H influenzae 19 (5.5%); and other causes, 21 patients (6.0%). In patients above the age of 55 years C pneumoniae was the second most frequent aetiological agent (25.5%). In 133 patients (38.4%) more than one causal agent was found.

CONCLUSIONS

The causal agents for community-acquired pneumonia in Israel are different from those described in other parts of the world. In many of the patients more than one causal agent was found. In all these patients treatment should include a macrolide antibiotic, at least in the first stage of their illness.

Aetiology of community-acquired pneumonia: a prospective study among adults requiring admission to hospital

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of microorganisms causing community-acquired pneumonia in patients who required admission to hospital was investigated and the percentage of cases whose aetiology remained unknown due to the study design and logistical problems estimated.

METHODS

Between January 1991 and April 1993 all patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to six hospitals were included in the study. Aetiological diagnosis, categorised as definite, probable and possible, was based on the results of routine microbiological and serological tests.

RESULTS

Three hundred and thirty four patients with a median age of 65 (range 17-92) years were enrolled in the study. The diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia was definite in 108 cases, and probable or possible in 73 and 27 cases, respectively, including dual infections. Streptococcus pneumoniae was the predominant pathogen (27%) followed by viruses and Haemophilus influenzae (both about 8%) and Mycoplasma pneumoniae (6%). Chlamydia spp (3%) and Legionella pneumophila (2%) were less frequently detected. No diagnosis was made in 45% of the cases. With adjustment for anti-microbial therapy before admission and for other logistical considerations, it is estimated that the aetiology could have been ascertained in 65% of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most frequently detected cause of community-acquired pneumonia. The inability to detect a micro-organism results mainly from the use of routine diagnostic tests and, to a lesser extent, from logistical problems or the use of antibiotics before admission.

Severe community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia. The French Study Group of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in ICU

Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most frequent pathogen of severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) necessitating hospitalization. The main objective of this multicentre prospective study was to determine the value of clinical, biological, and radiological features for predicting pneumococcal etiology and to define prognostic factors. Streptococcus pneumoniae was isolated in 43/132 patients (33%) with CAP requiring ICU treatment. The mean age of the patients with pneumococcal pneumonia was 55 +/- 17 (SD) yrs and 34 were male. On admission, 14 patients with pneumococcal pneumonia were in shock, 24 were mentally confused, and 27 required mechanical ventilation during their hospitalization. Among the clinical, biological, and radiological features, fever > 39 degrees C, pleuritic chest pain, lobar distribution or alveolar consolidation, and an increase in immature granulocytes > or = 5% of WBC were more frequent in pneumococcal pneumonia than in other etiologies. Mortality was 35%. Fatal outcome was significantly related to the presence of impaired alertness, septic shock, mechanical ventilation, acute renal failure, and bacteremic pneumonia.

Severe community-acquired pneumonia. Etiology, epidemiology, and prognosis factors. French Study Group for Community-Acquired Pneumonia in the Intensive Care Unit

A prospective study of 132 patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) treated in the ICU was carried out to determine the causative agents, the value of the clinical, biological, and radiologic features in predicting the etiology, and to define prognostic factors. The study group included 98 men and 34 women (mean age: 58 +/- 18 years). The most frequent underlying condition was COPD (51 patients, 39 percent). On admission, 35 patients were in shock, 71 were mentally confused, and 81 (61 percent) required mechanical ventilation during their hospitalization. The clinical, laboratory, and radiologic parameters were of little value for predicting the etiology in patients with severe CAP. An etiologic diagnosis was made in 95 (72 percent) patients. The most frequent pathogens were Streptococcus pneumoniae (43 cases [45 percent]), Gram-negative bacilli (14 cases [15 percent]), and Haemophilus influenzae (14 cases [15 percent]) Mortality was 24 percent. It was significantly associated with a age more than 60 years, septic shock, impairment of alertness, mechanical ventilation requirement, bacteremic pneumonia, and S pneumoniae or Enterobacteriaceae as the causes of the pneumonia. Recommendations for antibiotic chemotherapy in patients with severe CAP admitted to the ICU are included.

Randomized comparative trial with ampicillin/sulbactam versus cefamandole in the therapy of community acquired pneumonia

In a randomized prospective study ampicillin/sulbactam and cefamandole were compared in the therapy of patients hospitalized with community acquired pneumonia. Patients receiving ampicillin/sulbactam (n = 37) and cefamandole (n = 38) were similar with respect to age (mean age 70 vs. 76 years respectively), clinical characteristics, severity of illness and underlying disease. Pathogens isolated from patients in the cefamandole and ampicillin/sulbactam group, respectively, were Streptococcus pneumoniae (7 vs. 7 patients), Haemophilus parainfluenzae (7 vs. 6 patients), Haemophilus influenzae (5 vs. 5 patients), Staphylococcus aureus (5 vs. 4 patients), Escherichia coli (4 vs. 4 patients), Klebsiella pneumoniae (3 vs. 3 patients), Enterobacter spp. (2 vs. 3 patients), Moraxella catarrhalis (1 vs. 2 patients), and organisms of the oral flora (4 vs. 3 patients). The rate of resistance to penicillin was 80%, to clindamycin 76%, to erythromycin 45%, to ampicillin 43%, and to cefazolin 18%. Overall successful treatment rates of 81% for cefamandole and 97% for ampicillin/sulbactam (p = 0.05) were observed. Both cefamandole and ampicillin/sulbactam were shown to be effective agents for therapy of community acquired pneumonia; however ampicillin/sulbactam demonstrated superior overall clinical efficacy.

Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia. Evaluation by transtracheal aspiration, blood culture, or serology

In a 5-year period, 254 patients with community-acquired pneumonia were attended to. Transtracheal aspiration (TTA) could be performed on 119 patients, blood cultures were performed on 201 patients, and 74 patients underwent serologic examinations. By use of these procedures, an etiologic diagnosis was established in 93 cases. Streptococcus pneumoniae was the most common pathogen as it was found in 35 cases. Eleven of these 35 patients (31.4 percent) had pneumococcemia, and the mortality in this group was 27.3 percent. None of the patients with pneumococcal pneumonia and negative blood culture died. Haemophilus influenzae was the only isolated pathogen from transtracheal aspirated sputum in 16 cases and accounted for 17.5 percent of pneumonias in previous healthy individuals under 50 years of age. Mycoplasma pneumonia infections, Legionella pneumophila infections, and Chlamydia infections were found in ten, eight, and three cases, respectively. The overall agreement between microscopy and culture of respiratory secretions obtained by TTA was 58.8 percent, and microscopy can be a guide when choosing the initial antibiotic treatment. No statistically significant difference in the rate of isolating bacteria among patients treated with antibiotics prior to TTA and patients not previously treated with antibiotics was seen. When contraindications were respected, we found TTA to be a safe procedure.

Treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized study comparing clarithromycin with erythromycin. Canada-Sweden Clarithromycin-Pneumonia Study Group

The efficacy and safety of orally administered clarithromycin and erythromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia were assessed in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study. Two hundred sixty-eight patients were randomized to receive either clarithromycin, 250 mg twice a day, or erythromycin stearate, 500 mg 4 times a day, for 7 to 14 days. Efficacy was evaluable in 173 patients (92 for clarithromycin, 81 for erythromycin). No statistically significant difference in clinical success rate (cure or improvement) was observed between the two groups (clarithromycin, 97 percent; erythromycin, 96 percent). Both groups had identical radiologic response (97 percent with resolution or improvement). Similarly, no statistically significant difference in bacteriologic response toward the target pathogens was observed among evaluable patients (clarithromycin, 23/26; erythromycin, 17/17; p value = 0.287). Clinical response toward Mycoplasma and Chlamydia pneumonia was comparable between the two groups (clarithromycin, 15/16; erythromycin, 10/11). However, patients receiving erythromycin had a twofold higher incidence of adverse events, mostly related to the gastrointestinal system, and were five times more likely to withdraw from therapy because of drug-related adverse events. These results show that clarithromycin is as effective as erythromycin in the outpatient treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Furthermore, the lower incidence of adverse events associated with clarithromycin indicates that it is more acceptable to patients and, therefore, can enhance compliance.

A three-year study of severe community-acquired pneumonia with emphasis on outcome

Fifty-eight consecutive patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia were studied prospectively during a three-year period. The group included 44 men and 14 women (mean age: 45.0 +/- 15.7 years). The cause of pneumonia was diagnosed in 35 (60.3 percent) cases, and the most common pathogens were Streptococcus pneumoniae (37.1 percent), Legionella pneumophila (22.8 percent) and Gram-negative bacilli (11.4 percent). The fact that Mycobacterium tuberculosis was present in four (11.4 percent) patients and Pneumocystis carinii in three (8.5 percent) is worthy of note. The overall death rate was 22.4 percent. More than 50 percent of deaths occurred within the first five days and were caused by septic shock, hemoptysis (tuberculosis) or hypoxia. However, hypoxia remains the main fatal complication and all late-occurring deaths (> 5 days) observed were due to this cause. These data could be important in planning strategies and protocols to improve prognosis.

Validation of the medical expert system PNEUMON-IA

The present study validates the expert system PNEUMON-IA. The aim of PNEUMON-IA is assessing the etiology of community-acquired pneumonias from clinical, radiological, and laboratory data obtained at the onset of the disease. Validation was performed using data from medical records of 76 patients with proven clinical diagnosis of pneumonia. The etiological diagnoses provided by PNEUMON-IA were compared to those established by five specialists unrelated to the development of the expert system. For each etiological possibility, both PNEUMON-IA and the experts provided a causal possibility, expressed as a linguistic label (i.e., "almost impossible"). Linguistic labels were then converted to numeric values. In the majority of cases, an etiological diagnosis was unavailable to be used as a gold standard. To overcome this limitation, distances between arrays of etiological possibilities given by specialists and by PNEUMON-IA were considered as an agreement measure between diagnoses. Cluster analysis based on those distances was used to classify PNEUMON-IA among experts. Results showed the same differences between specialists and PNEUMON-IA as among the specialists themselves. The method used to validate PNEUMON-IA could prove useful to assess the performance of expert systems in fields where no gold standard is available.

Efficacy and safety of temafloxacin versus those of amoxicillin in hospitalized adults with community-acquired pneumonia

Temafloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone, was compared with amoxicillin in the treatment of adult hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. In this double-blind, multicenter study, patients were randomly assigned to treatment with temafloxacin at 600 mg twice daily (n = 125) or amoxicillin at 500 mg three times daily (n = 121); the average duration of treatment was 10 days. Clinical recovery rates were similar for patients treated with temafloxacin and amoxicillin (89 and 85%), as were bacterial eradication rates (99 and 97%). This was also true for subgroups of patients with pneumococcal pneumonia (n = 100), nonpneumococcal pneumonia (n = 122), or atypical pneumonia (n = 12). Outcomes for temafloxacin- and amoxicillin-treated patients were also similar in terms of defervescence, improvement in leukocytosis, and radiographic evidence of infection. The frequency and severity of adverse events were similar in both groups, consisting primarily of digestive disorders and skin manifestations. We conclude that temafloxacin may be recommended as an alternative antibacterial drug for patients with suspected pneumococcal pneumonia who fail to respond to benzylpenicillin or amoxicillin when the incidence of multiresistant pneumococcal strains is low. In countries where the incidence of these strains is high, temafloxacin may also be recommended.

Antibiotic treatment in pneumonia due to Q fever

BACKGROUND

Whether Q fever responds better to doxycycline or erythromycin is unknown.

METHODS

The efficacy of doxycycline and erythromycin in the treatment of pneumonia due to Q fever was assessed in a prospective, randomised, double blind study of 82 patients with a diagnosis of pneumonia and features suggestive of Q fever infection; 48 proved to have Q fever. Of the 48, 23 received doxycycline 100 mg twice a day and 25 patients received erythromycin 500 mg six hourly, both for 10 days.

RESULTS

Both treatment groups had similar demographic characteristics. Fever showed a more rapid reduction in the doxycycline group (3(1.6) days versus 4.3(2) days). Side effects were observed in two patients receiving doxycycline compared with 11 patients receiving erythromycin (p less than 0.01). No differences were observed in other clinical or radiological measures. By day 40 the chest radiograph was normal in 47 of 48 patients.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate the self limiting and benign nature of most cases of pneumonia due to Q fever. Doxycycline was more effective than erythromycin.

The value of routine microbial investigation in community-acquired pneumonia

The way in which microbiological investigations are used in routine clinical practice and the value of such tests in directing antibiotic prescribing, was studied in adults admitted to hospital with a diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia. One-hundred and twenty-two consecutive patients admitted to one teaching and one district general hospital were studied between April 1988 and March 1989. Blood cultures were performed in 81% of cases, sputum was examined in 45% and complete serological tests were performed in 28%. No causative pathogen was found in 74% of cases and results of microbial tests directed a change in antibiotic therapy in only 8% of cases. Routine microbial investigation of all adults admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia is unhelpful and probably unnecessary. We suggest a strategy for microbial investigation linked to initial illness severity to replace the current haphazard approach.

Aetiology of community acquired pneumonia in Valencia, Spain: a multicentre prospective study

A year long multicentre prospective study was carried out in the Valencia region of Spain, to determine the cause of community acquired pneumonia. The study was based on 510 of 833 patients with pneumonia. Of these, 462 were admitted to hospital, where 31 patients died. A cause was established in only 281 cases--208 of bacterial, 60 of viral, and 13 of mixed infection. The most common microorganisms were Streptococcus pneumoniae (14.5%), Legionella sp (14%), Influenza virus (8%), and Mycoplasma pneumoniae (4%). There was a higher incidence of Legionella sp than in other studies.

Community acquired pneumonia: aetiology and prognostic index evaluation

A 10 month prospective study of all adults admitted to Waikato Hospital with community acquired pneumonia was performed to assess aetiology, mortality, hospital stay, and the value of a prognostic index based on that obtained from a British Thoracic Society study. The 92 patients in the survey had a mean age of 56 (range 13-97) years. A microbiological diagnosis was established in 72%; Streptococcus pneumoniae (33%), Mycoplasma pneumoniae (18%), and influenza A virus (8%) were the most common microorganisms. Other causative organisms were Legionella pneumophila (4 cases), Staphylococcus aureus (3), Klebsiella pneumoniae (2), Haemophilus influenzae (2), Nocardia brasiliensis (1), and Acinetobacter calcoaceticus (1). Chlamydia sp, influenza B virus and adenovirus were each found in one case; all were cultured on nasopharygeal aspirates. Aspiration was considered to be the underlying cause in five patients, two with epilepsy and one with pseudobulbar palsy. Five of the six deaths that occurred were in patients over 75 years of age and the other was 69. In four of the six the established causative organisms were Chlamydia sp (1), K pneumoniae (1), and S aureus (2). Patients had a 16 fold increased risk of death if they had two or more of the following on admission: a respiratory rate of 30/minute or more, diastolic blood pressure of 60 mm Hg or less, and either confusion or a plasma urea concentration greater than 7.0 mmol/l.