Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: long-term effects of propranolol versus verapamil in preventing sudden death in "low-risk" patients

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in childhood and adolescence - strategies to prevent sudden death

Clinically overt hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is the most common cause of sudden unexpected death in childhood and has significantly higher sudden death mortality in the 8- to 16-year age range than in the 17- to 30-year age range. A combination of electrocardiographic risk factors (a limb-lead ECG voltage sum >10 mV) and/or a septal wall thickness >190% of upper limit of normal for age (z-score > 3.72) defines a paediatric high-risk patient with great sensitivity. Syncope, blunted blood pressure response to exercise, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia and a malignant family history are additional risk factors. Of the medical treatments used, only beta-blocker therapy with lipophilic beta-blockers (i.e. propranolol, metoprolol or bisoprolol) have been shown to significantly reduce risk of sudden death, with doses ≥ 6 mg/kg BW in propranolol equivalents giving around a tenfold reduction in risk. Disopyramide therapy is a very useful adjunct to beta-blockers to improve prognosis in those patients that have dynamic outflow obstruction in spite of large doses of beta-blocker, and its use in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is not associated with significant pro-arrhythmia mortality. Calcium-channel blockers increase the risk of heart failure-associated death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients with severe generalized hypertrophy and should be avoided in such patients. Amiodarone does not protect against sudden death, and long-term use in children usually has to be terminated because of side effects. Therapy with internal cardioverter defibrillator implantation has high paediatric morbidity, 27% incidence of inappropriate shocks, and does not absolutely protect against mortality but is indicated as secondary prevention or in very high-risk patients.

Verapamil therapy in infants with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of acute and chronic treatment with verapamil in infants with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Prior studies have shown an improvement in adults with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who were treated with verapamil. Acutely, it reduced the degree of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Chronic therapy was associated with an improvement in symptoms and increased long-term survival. To date, no data are available on the efficacy of this drug in infants with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. We evaluated prospectively the safety and efficacy of verapamil in infants. The acute and chronic effects of verapamil on infants with an echocardiographic diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were evaluated at a single institution between 1980 and 1994, with long-term follow-up available until 1996. Acute effects of an intravenous bolus of 0.1 mg/kg and infusion at 0.007 mg/kg/min were evaluated, where possible, in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Oral verapamil at 3-5 mg/kg/day was started after catheterization. Follow-up included serial clinical, echocardiographic and Holter monitoring. A total of 22 patients were studied, 17 having a presumed diagnosis of primary hypertrophic cardiomyopathy including three with Noonan's syndrome. Acute infusion of the drug was well tolerated by all, without adverse electrophysiological effects. Haemodynamic effects were consistent with a negative inotropic action with significant falls in cardiac index (4.6+/-1.2 to 4.1+/-0.9 l/min/m2), systolic blood pressure (88+/-16 to 82+/-14 mmHg) and gradient across the left ventricular outflow tract (nine patients 48.2+/-30.4 to 28.4+/-24.1 mmHg). End-diastolic pressure was unchanged (14.0+/-6.8 to 13.9+/-4.7 mmHg). Three patients with primary hypertrophic cardiomyopathy died (two while being treated). In the group with primary hypertrophic cardiomyopathy continuing with long-term treatment, follow-up revealed regression in two, progression in three (two died) and stability in 10. For those treated, there was a trend towards improvement in clinical status. Verapamil is well tolerated acutely in infants with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The outcome was considerably better in these patients compared with prior reports, though careful long-term assessment is needed.

Sudden cardiac death in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: from bench to bedside with an emphasis on genetic markers

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common cause of death in the young, particularly in young competitive athletes. Death often occurs suddenly in asymptomatic, apparently healthy individuals. Several clinical parameters as well as genetic factors have been characterized that can identify those HCM patients who are at high risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD). The clinical parameters that have some predictive values for SCD in HCM patients are the following: a prior history of SCD, a family history of SCD, history of syncope, symptomatic ventricular tachycardia on Holter monitoring, inducible ventricular tachycardia during electrophysiologic studies, and myocardial ischemia in children with HCM. Recent identification of mutations in the beta myosin heavy chain gene and genotype-phenotype correlation in HCM patients have shown that the beta myosin heavy chain mutations are also prognosticators in HCM families. Several mutations such as Arg403Gln and Arg719Gln are associated with a high incidence of SCD, while Leu908Val mutation is associated with a benign course and a low incidence of SCD in HCM families. Additional genetic factors such as a polymorphism in angiotensin-converting enzyme I gene may also contribute to a high incidence of SCD in HCM families. Identification and characterization of HCM patients at high risk for SCD provide the opportunity to render prophylactic therapeutic interventions, such as implantation of defibrillators, in these individuals.