Is there a role for prophylactic subtotal colectomy among hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer germline mutation carriers?

Phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity of Lynch syndrome: a complex diagnostic challenge

Lynch syndrome is the hereditary disorder that most frequently predisposes to colorectal cancer as well as predisposing to a number of extracolonic cancers, most prominently endometrial cancer. It is caused by germline mutations in the mismatch repair genes. Both its phenotype and genotype show marked heterogeneity. This review gives a historical overview of the syndrome, its heterogeneity, its genomic landscape, and its implications for complex diagnosis, genetic counseling and putative implications for immunotherapy.

Milestones of Lynch syndrome: 1895-2015

Lynch syndrome, which is now recognized as the most common hereditary colorectal cancer condition, is characterized by the predisposition to a spectrum of cancers, primarily colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer. We chronicle over a century of discoveries that revolutionized the diagnosis and clinical management of Lynch syndrome, beginning in 1895 with Warthin's observations of familial cancer clusters, through the clinical era led by Lynch and the genetic era heralded by the discovery of causative mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes, to ongoing challenges.

Hereditary cancer syndromes with high risk of endometrial and ovarian cancer: surgical options for personalized care

Cancer genomics has increased our recognition of specific hereditary cancer mutations. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome and Lynch syndrome are two such entities in which women carrying specific mutations may be at high risk for developing breast, ovarian, and/or endometrial cancers. Risk reducing surgery such as prophylactic mastectomy, oophorectomy, and/or hysterectomy may allow women to decrease these risks after completing childbearing. Background, indications, and consequences of these procedures are reviewed.

Q48P mutation in the hMLH1 gene associated with Lynch syndrome in three Hungarian families

Lynch syndrome (Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, HNPCC) is an inherited disease with variable phenotype causing the development of colon cancer and other malignancies. The basis of the disease is believed to be the mismatch repair gene mutations. Genetic screening has been performed among the patients who have undergone surgery for colon cancer at the University of Debrecen, Department of Surgery. Tumor samples of the screened patients were submitted to immunohistochemistry on hMLH1, hMSH2 and hMSH6 genes, microsatellite instability testing, followed by sequencing and multiple ligation dependent probe amplification. Three families were identified with the missense mutation c.143A>C (p.Q48P) of hMLH1 gene. In one of the families a segregation analysis of this particular variant was also accomplished. The segregation analysis revealed a clear correlation between the tumor cases and the occurrence of this mutation. However, none of the analyzed 100 healthy controls demonstrated the same aberration. There is only one published evidence in the literature about the presence of this rare variant in any population. The Gln to Pro switch in the ATPase domain, a conservative region of the hMLH1 gene, creates significant changes in the protein structure. These results indicate that this mutation is the abnormality responsible for the patients' phenotype and it is feasible that this particular aberration occurs more frequently among Hungarian Lynch syndrome patients.

Identification and surveillance of 19 Lynch syndrome families in southern Italy: report of six novel germline mutations and a common founder mutation

Lynch syndrome (LS), or hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), is an autosomal dominant condition responsible for early onset cancer mostly in the colonrectum and endometrium as well as in other organ sites. Lynch syndrome is caused by germline mutations in mismatch repair genes, prevalently in hMSH2, hMLH1, and less frequently in hMSH6 and hPMS2. Twenty-nine non-related index cases with colorectal cancer (CRC) were collected from a region in southeast Italy (Apulia). Among this set of patients, fifteen fulfilled the Amsterdam criteria II. The presence of tumor microsatellite instability (MSI) was assessed in all index cases and 19 (15 AC+/4 AC-) were classified as MSI-H. Mutation analysis performed on all patients, identified 15 pathogenic mutations in hMLH1 and 4 in hMSH2. 4/15 mutations in hMLH1 and 2/4 hMSH2 mutations have not been previously reported. Three previously reported mutations were further investigated for the possibility of a common founder effect. Genetic counseling was offered to all probands and extended to 183 relatives after molecular testing and 85 (46%) mutation carriers were identified. Eighty mutation carriers underwent an accurate clinical and instrumental surveillance protocol. Our results confirm that the identification of LS patients based exclusively on family history may miss patients carrying germline mutations in the MMR genes. Moreover, our results demonstrated that molecular screening and subsequent instrumental surveillance are very effective in identifying CRCs at earlier stages and reducing the number of deaths from secondary cancers in HNPCC patients.

Prophylactic total gastrectomy for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer. Review of the literature

Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) is characterized as an autosomal dominant cancer susceptibility syndrome largely attributable to germline mutations and deletions in the gene encoding E-cadherin, CDH1. Mutation carriers have a more than 70% lifetime risk of developing DGC and an elevated probability of lobular breast cancer. The aim of this review was to evaluate the results of surgical treatment for HDGC with special reference to the extent of its histological spread and to analyze the recent literature in order to provide an update on the current concepts of prophylactic gastrectomy for disease prevention. Nevertheless, it is not clear that our current knowledge of molecular and genetic diagnostics calls for the addition of HDGC to the roster of malignant familial syndromes in which early counseling and preventive surgical intervention should become the standard of care. Endoscopic screening cannot be recommended because the stomach appears normal and biopsies often fail to demonstrate signet ring cell adenocarcinoma. Prophylactic gastrectomy has provided many members of affected families with relief from GC with minimal implications.

Surgical management of colorectal cancer: A review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Colon cancer management continues to evolve with significant advances in chemotherapy, surgical technique and palliative interventions. As the options of therapy have improved, so have the challenges of management of primary colon cancer.

REVIEW

A review of historical and up to date literature was undertaken utilising Medline/PubMed to examine relevant topics of interest-related to the surgical management. Enhanced knowledge of genetics associated with colon cancer has improved our care of patients with hereditary colon cancer syndromes. Additionally, traditional approaches to surgical intervention for primary colon cancer have been questioned and will be discussed in this review including the role of laparoscopy, use of mechanical bowel preparation, management of the primary tumour in the face of metastatic disease, as well as the role of palliative intervention in select patients.

CONCLUSION

Colon cancer has seen improvement and expansion of therapeutic approaches to primary colon cancer. Laparoscopy and palliative interventions have become widely accepted with level I evidence to demonstrate good patient outcomes. Traditional dogma with mechanical bowel preparation has been challenged and debunked with regards to the efficacious benefits previously accepted. The management of the primary tumour has now become increasingly complex as it appears to be a reasonable approach to manage the primary tumour non-operatively in select cases of extracolonic disease requiring management.

Phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity in the Lynch syndrome: diagnostic, surveillance and management implications

Lynch syndrome is the most common form of hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC). This review covers the cardinal features of Lynch syndrome with particular emphasis upon its diagnostic criteria, molecular genetics, natural history, genetic counseling, surveillance and management. Considerable attention has been given to the etiologic role of mismatch repair (MMR) genes as well as low penetrance alleles and modifier genes. The American founder mutation, a deletion of exons 1-6 of MSH2, is discussed in some detail, owing to its high frequency in the US (19 000-30 000 carriers). Genetic counseling is essential prior to patients' undergoing DNA testing and again when receiving their test results. Families with a lower incidence of CRC and extracolonic cancers, in the face of being positive for Amsterdam I criteria but who do not have MMR deficiency by tumor testing, are probably not Lynch syndrome, and thereby should preferably be designated as familial CRC of undetermined type. Patients who are either noncompliant or poorly compliant with colonoscopy, and who are MMR mutation positive, may be candidates for prophylactic colectomy, while MMR mutation-positive women who are noncompliant with gynecologic surveillance may be candidates for prophylactic hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.

[Our experience with the incidence of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer]

INTRODUCTION

Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC) is the most frequent genetic disease leading to colorectal malignancies. 3-5 percent of all colorectal cancer cases are related to Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer. Currently there is no reliable data on the incidence of the disease in Hungary.

METHODS

The family history of 809 patients with colorectal cancer was investigated between 1997 and 2006. Data collection was performed in a retrospective manner in the rst and in a prospective manner in the second phase of the study. Subsequent immunohistochemical and microsatellite instability analysis, and DNA sequencing was carried out to detect any underlying MMR gene mutation. Moreover, multiple ligation dependent probe amplication was applied for recognizing large deletions in MMR genes.

RESULTS

During the investigation 10 pathogenic mutations and several polymorphisms were found. Seven mutations were detected in families fulfilling the Amsterdam Criteria, while the remaining three fulfilled the Bethesda Criteria. In the second phase of the study -- which better reflects the real population characteristics -- six percent of our patients fulfilled completely the Amsterdam Criteria and we managed to nd pathogenic MMR gene mutations in 1,7 percent of our patients.

CONCLUSION

8 out of 10 pathogenic mutations were novel and published rst time by ourselves. No repeatedly occurring mutations were found in our patients. It seems that these genetic alterations are located sporadically on different exons of the involved MMR genes. Our mutation detection rate was 77 percent in the Amsterdam positive patients who were completely examined, which appears to be better than the published data in the relevant literature. Importantly, 30 percent of the mutation carrier could be missed applying only this single criteria system. In order to detect the highest number of HNPCC patients, we suggest using both the Amsterdam as well as the Bethesda Criteria.

[Hereditary colorectal cancer]

One of the main challenges in the clinical management of familial colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the overlap of syndromes with different underlying genetic causes and the differentiated risk management of colorectal and associated malignancies. The Lynch syndrome (hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, HNPCC) is characterized by the development of colorectal, endometrial, gastric and other cancers and is caused by a mutation in one of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Microsatellite instability (MSI) and/or immunohistochemistry (IHC) are important prognostic factors and may predict the response to chemotherapy. Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) may be seen as a counterpart to Lynch syndrome, responsible for <1% of all CRC cases. Recently the MUTYH gene has been identified as a further polyposis gene. The associated disorder has been termed MYH-associated polyposis (MAP) and displays an autosomal recessive pattern of inheritance. For clinical management, distinguishing between Lynch syndrome, attenuated FAP and MAP is important for risk assessment, surveillance recommendations and indication for prophylactic surgery.

Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: prophylactic surgical oncology implications

Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) is an autosomal dominantly inherited syndrome attributed to mutations of the E-cadherin gene, CDH1. There is no proven effective screening for early HDGC, and symptomatic disease is almost universally fatal. The only available effective option for CDH1 carriers is prophylactic total gastrectomy, but the variable age of onset of HDGC and the reduced penetrance (about 70%) of the CDHI gene further complicate patients' decision making.

Screening for Rectal Cancer – Will it Improve Cure Rates?

Here we give an overview of colorectal cancer screening strategies with an emphasis on the diagnosis and management of rectal cancer. We review the published studies on screening in the high-risk population, including patients with a history of colorectal cancer, inflammatory bowel disease and inherited conditions. In the average-risk population, the evidence base for a number of screening strategies is evaluated, including endoscopy, contrast studies and faecal occult blood testing. Screening guidelines in the high-risk population are predominantly based on case-control studies comparing the incidence of colorectal cancer in screened and control groups. Screening the average-risk population for colorectal cancer reduces cancer-specific mortality by 15% after biennial guaiac faecal occult blood testing and 50-80% after flexible sigmoidoscopy. All of the screening strategies outlined have a greater sensitivity for distal lesions than proximal lesions.

The surgeon's role in cancer prevention. The model in colorectal carcinoma

Cancer Prevention is an emerging field, capturing the old traditional concept of anticipating the development of a major disease and preventing its full impact by early detection, treatment, or aborting the tumorigenic process by a "molecular vaccine" and alleviating the full impact of the disease. Surgeons are important clinician scientists who can carry this discipline forward and develop its full potential in the clinics and in the community. Advances in molecular biology, genetics, and other technologies have permitted seminal understanding of the carcinogenic pathways and identification of targets and intermediate end points in neoplasia. In this review, we will see that we have the means of preventing significant numbers of colorectal carcinomas (CRC).

[Regional growth preferences in hereditary, synchronous, and metachronous colorectal carcinomas. Basics of tumor surgery Part II]

This article discusses the therapeutic importance of the loss of self-regulation of cell division in polypoid adenomas and in the cloacogenic, cancerophilic rectal segment. Regional growth preferences can observed in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and ulcerative colitis, as in other diseases featuring a cancerous disposition on the mucosa. For example, rectal carcinomas are more common than colon carcinomas if one considers the total mucosal surface area at risk. Malignant changes do not occur randomly in existing adenomas of FAP patients, and the adenomas' cell division--as in other adenomas--is governed by some degree of self-regulation. In FAP patients undergoing proctocolectomy, preferred new growth areas for carcinomas include the duodenum and ileum. In patients with synchronous colorectal cancers, the rectum is more commonly affected than other colon segments. If the rectum is resected, metachronous carcinomas are exceedingly rare in the remaining colon segments. Clinical decisions about rectal resection must be informed by understanding of the importance of this organ for anorectal continence as well as the described growth of colorectal malignancies.

The Role of Prophylactic Surgery in Cancer Prevention

BACKGROUND

Since the human genome has been sequenced many mysteries of cell biology have been unravelled, thereby clarifying the pathogenesis of several diseases, particularly cancer. In members of kindreds with certain hereditary diseases, it is now possible early in life to predict with great certainty whether or not a family member has inherited the mutated allele causing the disease. In hereditary malignancies this has been particularly important, because in affected family members there is the possibility of removing the organ destined to develop cancer before malignancy develops or while it is in situ. At first consideration, it would appear that "prophylactic surgery" would have a place in many hereditary malignancies; however, the procedure has applicability only if certain criteria are met: (1) the genetic mutation causing the hereditary malignancy must have a very high penetrance and be expressed regardless of environmental factors; (2) there must be a highly reliable test to identify patients who have inherited the mutated gene; (3) the organ must be removed with minimal morbidity and virtually no mortality; (4) there must be a suitable replacement for the function of the removed organ; and (5) there must be a reliable method of determining over time that the patient has been cured by "prophylactic surgery."

CONCLUSIONS

In this monograph we review several hereditary malignancies and consider those where prophylactic surgery might be useful. As we learn, there are various barriers to performing the procedure in many common hereditary cancer syndromes. The archetype disease syndromes, which meet each of the five criteria mentioned above and where prophylactic surgery is most useful, are the type 2 multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) syndromes: MEN2A, MEN2B, and the related familial medullary thyroid carcinoma. An additional benefit of the Human Genome Project, has been the development of pharmacologic and biologic compounds that block the metabolic pathway(s) activated by specific genetic mutations. Many of these compounds have shown efficacy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancers, and there is the likelihood that they will prove beneficial in preventing the outgrowth of malignant cells in patients destined to develop a hereditary cancer.

ASCO/SSO review of current role of risk-reducing surgery in common hereditary cancer syndromes

BACKGROUND

A significant portion of cancers are accounted for by a heritable component, which has increasingly been linked to mutations in specific genes. Clinical interventions have been formulated for mutation carriers within affected families. The primary interventions for mutation carriers of highly penetrant syndromes are surgical.

METHODS

The American Society of Clinical Oncology and the Society of Surgical Oncology formed a task force charged with presenting an educational symposium on surgical management of hereditary cancer syndromes at annual society meetings, and this resulted in a position paper on this topic. The content of both the symposium and the position paper was developed as a consensus statement.

RESULTS

This article addresses hereditary breast, colorectal, ovarian/endometrial, and multiple endocrine neoplasias. A brief introduction on the genetics and natural history of each disease is provided, followed by detailed descriptions of modern surgical approaches, clinical and genetic indications, timing of prophylactic surgery, and the efficacy of surgery (when known). Although several recent reviews have addressed the role of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility, this article focuses on the issues surrounding surgical technique, timing, and indications for surgical prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk-reducing surgical treatment of hereditary cancer is a complex undertaking. It requires a clear understanding of the natural history of the disease, realistic appreciation of the potential benefits and risks of these procedures in potentially otherwise healthy individuals, and the long-term sequelae of such interventions, as well as the individual patient's and family's perceptions of surgical risk and anticipated benefit.

ASCO/SSO review of current role of risk-reducing surgery in common hereditary cancer syndromes

Although the etiology of solid cancers is multifactorial, with environmental and genetic factors playing a variable role, a significant portion of the burden of cancer is accounted for by a heritable component. Increasingly, the heritable component of cancer predispositions has been linked to mutations in specific genes, and clinical interventions have been formulated for mutation carriers within affected families. The primary interventions for mutations carriers for highly penetrant syndromes such as multiple endocrine neoplasias, familial adenomatous polyposis, hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer, and hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndromes are primarily surgical. For that reason, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) have undertaken an educational effort within the oncology community. A joint ASCO/SSO Task Force was charged with presenting an educational symposium on the surgical management of hereditary cancer syndromes at the annual ASCO and SSO meetings, resulting in an educational position article on this topic. Both the content of the symposium and the article were developed as a consensus statement by the Task Force, with the intent of summarizing the current standard of care. This article is divided into four sections addressing breast, colorectal, ovarian and endometrial cancers, and multiple endocrine neoplasia. For each, a brief introduction on the genetics and natural history of the disease is provided, followed by a detailed description of modern surgical approaches, including a description of the clinical and genetic indications and timing of prophylactic surgery, and the efficacy of prophylactic surgery when known. Although a number of recent reviews have addressed the role of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility, including the richly illustrated Cancer Genetics and Cancer Predisposition Testing curriculum by the ASCO Cancer Genetics Working Group (available through http://www.asco.org), this article focuses on the issues surrounding the why, how, and when of surgical prophylaxis for inherited forms of cancer. This is a complex process, which requires a clear understanding of the natural history of the disease and variance of penetrance, a realistic appreciation of the potential benefit and risk of a risk-reducing procedure in a potentially otherwise healthy individual, the long-term sequelae of such surgical intervention, as well as the individual patient and family's perception of surgical risk and anticipated benefit.

Occult endometrial cancer and decision making for prophylactic hysterectomy in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is the most frequent form of hereditary colorectal cancer. In addition to the high lifetime risk for colorectal cancer in mutation carriers, there is also a remarkably increased risk for endometrial cancer (EC).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, clinical and molecular approach to the individual decision making as to whether or not to perform a prophylactic hysterectomy in a subset of HNPCC patients is discussed. 147 female patients meeting at least one criterion of the Bethesda guidelines were included in this analysis between 1995 and 2003. After clinical and genetic counseling, patients gave informed written consent and microsatellite analysis, immunohistochemistry and sequencing of the mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 was performed.

RESULTS

11 of the analyzed patients had a personal history of EC and had undergone previous hysterectomy at ages 26 to 62 years. Prophylactic hysterectomy with oophorectomy was considered in postmenopausal women meeting the Amsterdam criteria and/or carrying a disease causing mismatch repair gene mutation who were operated on because of diagnosed colorectal cancer in our center for hereditary cancer. This procedure was performed in 4 patients. None of them had shown any symptoms of a gynecologic malignancy. Preoperative gynecological examination showed no evidence for EC or ovarian cancer in these patients. Postoperative histological examination showed EC stage T1b N0 M0 in 2 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Since the efficiency of gynecological surveillance is uncertain, prophylactic hysterectomy could be an option for a subset of HNPCC patients and mutation carriers.

Is MSI-H of value in predicting the development of metachronous colorectal cancer?

Nearly 10% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) develop a metachronous cancer after curative resection of their primary malignancy, however identifying these patients is problematic. Although microsatellite instability (MSI) is associated with the development of multiple CRC, this is predominantly seen in those with hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). This study has examined the value of MSI analysis in identifying patients at risk of developing metachronous cancer from the general population. MSI analysis was performed at the Bat25, Bat26, Bat40, D2S123, D5S346 and D17S250 loci using polymerase chain reaction and single-stranded conformational polymorphism on DNA extracted from 62 specimens taken from 49 patients with metachronous CRC, and from 71 primary single CRCs. MSI status was classified into MSI-H, MSI-L and MSS. MSI-H was more prevalent in metachronous cancers, 34/62 compared to 8/71 single cancers (P < 0.0001). The incidence of MSI-H from proximal colon cancers in index metachronous group, 4/22 was similar to single cancer group, 7/71 (P = 0.28), however MSI-H was more commonly identified in index metachronous cancers located distal to the splenic flexure 9/22 than single cancers 1/71 (P < 0.0001). Patients presenting with MSI-H colorectal cancers distal to the splenic flexure are more likely to develop a metachronous cancer and will benefit from surveillance.

The role of MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 in the development of multiple colorectal cancers

There is increased incidence of microsatellite instability (MSI) in patients who develop multiple primary colorectal cancers (CRC), although the association with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) is unclear. This study aims to evaluate the underlying genetic cause of MSI in these patients. Microsatellite instability was investigated in 111 paraffin-embedded CRCs obtained from 78 patients with metachronous and synchronous cancers, and a control group consisting of 74 cancers from patients with a single CRC. Tumours were classified as high level (MSI-H), low level (MSI-L) or stable (MSS). MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 gene expression was measured by immunohistochemistry. Methylation of the MLH1 promoter region was evaluated in MSI-H cancers that failed to express MLH1, and mutational analysis performed in MSI-H samples that expressed MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 proteins. The frequency of MSI-H was significantly greater in the multiple, 58 out of 111 (52%), compared to the single cancers, 10 out of 74 (13.5%), P < 0.01. Of the 32 patients from whom two or more cancers were analysed, eight (25%) demonstrated MSI-H in both cancers, 13 (41%) demonstrated MSI-H in one cancer and 11 (34%) failed to demonstrate any MSI-H. MSI-H single cancers failed to express MLH1 or MSH2 in seven out of nine (78%) cases and MSI-L/MSS cancers failed to express MLH1 or MSH2 in one out of 45 (2.2%) cases, all cancers expressed MSH6. MSI-H multiple cancers failed to express MLH1 or MSH2 in 21 out of 43 (48%) cases and MSI-L/MSS cancers failed to express MLH1 or MSH2 in four out of 32 (12.5%) cases. MSH6 expression was lost in five MSI-H multiple cancers, four of which also failed to express MLH1 or MSH2. Loss of expression of the same mismatch repair (MMR) gene was identified in both cancers from six out of 19 (31%) patients. Methylation was identified in 11 out of 17 (65%) multiple and three out of six (50%) single MSI-H cancers that failed to express MLH1. Mutational analysis of 10 MSI-H multiple cancers that expressed MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 failed to demonstrate mutations in the MLH1 or MSH2 genes. We suggest that, although MSI-H is more commonly identified in those with multiple colorectal cancers, this does not commonly arise from a classical HNPCC pathway.

Gastric cancer: new genetic developments

Gastric cancer's (GC) incidence shows large geographic differences worldwide with the lowest rates occurring in most Western industrialized countries including the United States and the United Kingdom; in contrast, relatively high rates of GC occur in Japan, Korea, China, and South America, particularly Chile. The Laurén classification system classifies GC under two major histopathological variants: 1) an intestinal type and 2) a diffuse type. The intestinal type is more common in the general population, more likely to be sporadic and related to environmental factors such as diet, particularly salted fish and meat as well as smoked foods, cigarette smoking, and alcohol use. It exhibits components of glandular, solid, or intestinal architecture, as well as tubular structures. On the other hand, the diffuse type is more likely to have a primary genetic etiology, a subset of which, known as hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC), is due to the E-cadherin (CDH1) germline mutation. The diffuse type pathology is characterized by poorly cohesive clusters of cells which infiltrate the gastric wall, leading to its widespread thickening and rigidity of the gastric wall, known as linitis plastica. Helicobacter pylori infection is associated with risk for both the intestinal and diffuse varieties of gastric cancer. Germline truncating mutations of the CDH1 gene, which codes for the E-cadherin protein, were initially identified in three Maori families from New Zealand that were predisposed to diffuse GC. Since then, similar mutations have been described in more than 40 additional HDGC families of diverse ethnic backgrounds. It is noteworthy that two-thirds of HDGC families reported to date have proved negative for the CDH1 germline mutation. A number of candidate genes have been identified through analysis of the molecular biology of E-cadherin. Patients with evidence of the CDH1 germline mutation in the context of a family history of HDGC must be considered as candidates for prophylactic gastrectomy, given the extreme difficulty in its early diagnosis and its exceedingly poor prognosis when there is regional or distant spread. Specifically, the E-cadherin cytoplasmic tail interacts with catenins, assembling the cell-adhesion complex involved with E-cadherin mediated cell:cell adhesion. Beta-catenin and gamma-catenin compete for the same binding site on the E-cadherin cytoplasmic tail, directly linking the adhesion complex to the cytoskeleton through alpha-catenin. Beta-catenin gene (CTNNB1) mutations have been described predominantly in intestinal-type gastric cancers and CTNNB1 gene amplification and overexpression have recently been described in a mixed-type gastric cancer. This paper reviews the genetics of both intestinal and diffuse types of gastric carcinoma, their differential diagnosis, molecular genetics, pathology, and, when known, their mode of genetic transmission within families.

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer identification and surveillance of high-risk families

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer is an autosomal dominant condition caused by highly penetrant gene mutations. It is characterized by increased susceptibility for a specific group of cancer, mainly colorectal cancer. The syndrome originates from the inheritance of mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes. The most commonly affected genes in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer are hMLH1 and hMSH2. Their deficient expression renders the cell susceptible to the accumulation of many molecular defects, a condition which can be evaluated by the instability in sections of base repeats in the genoma known as microsatellite instability. The molecular detection of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer is possible in most of the highly suspicious cases. Genetic tests for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer also allow characterization of the individual that bears the mutation within a family. The high cost and restricted availability of these tests hamper their use for every person presenting colorectal cancer. Due to this fact, some clinical criteria have been developed by a hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer international organization to select families with a high probability of carrying the mutation. Once families at risk are identified, they are encouraged to join a screening program that aims at early detection of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer-related cancers, increasing the possibility of its prevention and early detection.

Screening for an inherited susceptibility to colorectal cancer

The principal Mendelian disorders predisposing to colorectal cancer are familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). FAP is caused by mutations in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene. HNPCC is caused by a mutation in one of at least five mismatch repair genes. It is important to identify individuals with these conditions because colon cancer will occur in at least 80% and onset is earlier than in the general population. Potential benefits of identification include improved compliance with recommended surveillance, early detection of polyps, reduction in cancer mortality, and reassurance for relatives found to be negative with attendant savings in the time and expense of surveillance. For classic FAP, the large number of polyps readily identifies affected persons. For HNPCC, identification of individuals meriting DNA sequencing requires either recognition of a suspect family history or finding high microsatellite instability in a tumor. Individuals accepting the offer of genetic counseling and DNA testing often have more cancers in their family, are motivated to inform relatives, have a larger social network, and have more confidence in their coping ability. Individuals who decline are often concerned about their own or their family's emotional reaction or fear discrimination.

Inherited predisposition to cancer: a historical overview

The hereditary predisposition to cancer dates historically to interest piqued by physicians as well as family members wherein striking phenotypic features were shown to cluster in families, inclusive of the rather grotesque cutaneous findings in von Recklinghausen's neurofibromatosis, which date back to the sixteenth century. The search for the role of primary genetic factors was heralded by studies at the infrahuman level, particularly on laboratory mouse strains with strong susceptibility to carcinogen-induced cancer, and conversely, with resistance to the same carcinogens. These studies, developed in the 19th and 20th centuries, continue today. This article traces the historical aspects of hereditary cancer dealing with identification and ultimate molecular genetic confirmation of commonly occurring cancers, particularly of the colon in the case of familial adenomatous polyposis and its attenuated form, both due to the APC germline mutation; the Lynch syndrome due to mutations in mismatch repair genes, the most common of which were found to be MSH2, MLH1, and MSH6 germline mutations; the hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndrome with BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations; the Li-Fraumeni (SBLA) syndrome due to the p53 mutation; and the familial atypical multiple mole melanoma in association with pancreatic cancer due to the CDKN2A (p16) germline mutation. These and other hereditary cancer syndromes have been discussed in some detail relevant to their characterization, which, for many conditions, took place in the late 18th century and, in the more modern molecular genetic era, during the past two decades. Emphasis has been placed upon the manner in which improved cancer control will emanate from these discoveries.

Treatment of Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Syndromes

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Although most colorectal cancers are sporadic, about 25% have a familial predisposition and 5% to 7% are hereditary and occur in genetically distinct high-risk families. Advances in treatment options and management of hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes that have occurred over the past years have been principally due to advances in the understanding of the genetics of these syndromes and in additional options for testing. This has led to the possibility of preclinical diagnosis and early surveillance and treatment. In addition, improvements in medical and surgical management have also occurred. This article focuses on four hereditary colon cancer syndromes: familial adenomatous polyposis, hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, juvenile polyposis syndrome, and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome.

Clinical management of hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Although most colorectal cancers are sporadic, approximately 25% have a familial predisposition, and 5 to 7% are hereditary and occur in genetically distinct high-risk families. This review focuses on four hereditary colon cancer syndromes: familial adenomatosus polyposis, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, juvenile polyposis syndrome, and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome.

RECENT FINDINGS

The management of the inherited colorectal cancer syndromes has progressed substantially over the past years because of advancement of genetic understanding and testing options, which have led to the possibility of preclinical diagnosis and early surveillance and treatment. Genetic testing is based on identification of specific abnormalities and should be combined with counseling of affected families.

SUMMARY

Recent advances have contributed to the understanding of the molecular basis of various types of colorectal cancer, and among these, the inherited colorectal cancer syndromes have attracted much attention. Expanding recognition of clinical characteristics, targeted surveillance strategies and new methods of treatment have led to improved clinical management of these syndromes.

The reliability of immunohistochemistry as a prescreening method for the diagnosis of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC)--results of an international collaborative study

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome (HNPCC) is an autosomal dominant condition accounting for 2-5% of all colorectal carcinomas as well as a small subset of endometrial, upper urinary tract and other gastrointestinal cancers. An assay to detect the underlying defect in HNPCC, inactivation of a DNA mismatch repair enzyme, would be useful in identifying HNPCC probands. Monoclonal antibodies against hMLH1 and hMSH2, two DNA mismatch repair proteins which account for most HNPCC cancers, are commercially available. This study sought to investigate the potential utility of these antibodies in determining the expression status of these proteins in paraffin-embedded formalin-fixed tissue and to identify key technical protocol components associated with successful staining. A set of 20 colorectal carcinoma cases of known hMLH1 and hMSH2 mutation and expression status underwent immunoperoxidase staining at multiple institutions, each of which used their own technical protocol. Staining for hMSH2 was successful in most laboratories while staining for hMLH1 proved problematic in multiple labs. However, a significant minority of laboratories demonstrated excellent results including high discriminatory power with both monoclonal antibodies. These laboratories appropriately identified hMLH1 or hMSH2 inactivation with high sensitivity and specificity. The key protocol point associated with successful staining was an antigen retrieval step involving heat treatment and either EDTA or citrate buffer. This study demonstrates the potential utility of immunohistochemistry in detecting HNPCC probands and identifies key technical components for successful staining.

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: preventive management

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is the most common form of hereditary colorectal cancer. Inherited mutations in the mismatch repair genes associated with this syndrome have an approximate 80% lifetime risk of colorectal cancer. Since there are no premonitory signs of susceptibility to HNPCC, family history is the initial method for identifying those at increased risk. At risk individuals should undergo genetic counseling and testing. Although an algorithmic indication for genetic testing in at risk HNPCC patients is yet to be determined, many advocate initial screening for microsatellite instability (MSI) of the cancer specimen in individuals suspected of carrying HNPCC mutations. Those who test positive for MSI can then undergo further testing for mutations in the associated germline mismatch repair genes. Techniques for detecting these mutations currently include in vitro synthesized-protein assay, single-strand conformational polymorphism, and DNA sequencing. Given the aggressive nature of HNPCC adenomas, individuals who test positive for HNPCC mutations are recommended to undergo yearly colonoscopic surveillance starting at the age of 25. A reasonable alternative to lifetime colonoscopic surveillance for the prevention of colorectal cancer in these individuals is prophylactic colectomy. The prevention of colorectal cancer through pharmacological means is under investigation as another option in the management of HNPCC patients. Specifically, chemoprevention trials are currently ongoing to evaluate the efficacy of COX-2 inhibitors in the prevention of colorectal cancer in HNPCC and familial adenomatous polyposis patients.

Carrier risk status changes resulting from mutation testing in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer and hereditary breast-ovarian cancer

CONTEXT

In hereditary cancer syndrome families with an identified cancer associated mutation, mutation testing changes the carrier risk status of the tested person and may change the carrier risk status of relatives.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the change in the distribution of carrier risk status resulting from testing in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer (HBOC) and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) families.

DESIGN

This was an observational cohort study.

PATIENTS

The cohort included members of 75 HBOC and 47 HNPCC families. Of the 10 910 cohort members, 1408 were tested for a mutation and learned their test results.

OUTCOME MEASURE

Carrier risk for all cohort members was assessed before and after mutation testing.

RESULTS

There was a change in carrier risk status in 2906 subjects after testing of 1408 family members. The most common type of carrier risk change, from at risk to non-carrier status, accounted for 77% of the risk changes; 12% were a change to known carrier status from a lower risk. Sixty percent of persons with a carrier risk status change were not themselves tested; their risk status changed because of a relative's test result.

CONCLUSIONS

Carrier risk status changes from uncertainty to certainty (that is, to carrier or to non-carrier) account for 89% of risk changes resulting from testing. These risk changes affect cancer prevention recommendations, most commonly reducing their burden. Current practices do not ensure that untested family members are informed about changes in their carrier risk status which result from mutation testing of their relatives.

Lynch syndrome: implications for the surgeon

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), or Lynch syndrome, is an autosomal dominant syndrome characterized by onset of colorectal cancer (CRC) at an early age, right-sided predominance, excess synchronous and metachronous colorectal neoplasms, and extracolonic neoplasms. It is the most common of the hereditary CRCs, so the practicing surgeon should expect to encounter patients with this disease. The diagnosis of HNPCC, which begins with a complete family history and a high index of suspicion by the clinician, has important implications in the management and surveillance of not only the affected individual but also for the individual's family. In this article, the diagnosis and management of Lynch syndrome will be reviewed, with emphasis on the implications for the surgeon.

Three new mutations in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome II) in Uruguay

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is the most common hereditary form of colorectal cancer (CRC). Our purpose is to describe three extended HNPCC families, each of which manifests novel germline mutations in Uruguay, a small country that is a study model for cancer investigation given its high cancer incidence and mortality rate. This is a study of three extended HNPCC families in which extensive genealogic information, medical history, and pathology findings are critically reviewed. DNA testing was performed for evidence of HNPCC mutations. The findings reveal three novel germline mutations, namely MLH1, with a deletion resulting in a frameshift and a premature stop codon (codon 228) in one of the families; in the second family, MSH2 exon 1, codon 61 at nucleotide 181, which results in immediate stop of translation; and in the third family, a mutation in MSH2 at exon 3: the amino acid at nucleotide 530, codon 117, causing a frameshift and a premature stop codon eight base pairs later. We conclude that it is important to study HNPCC mismatch repair genes because of emerging evidence for genotypic and phenotypic heterogeneity, which will harbor the potential to eventually translate this knowledge into specific screening and management protocols. Future projections for such mutations could even contribute to the emergence of molecular-based designer drugs developed through advances in genomics, proteomics, high-throughput screening, and bioinformatics, which would be effective therapeutically for these high-cancer risk patients.

Preventive surgery for colon cancer in familial adenomatous polyposis and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome

BACKGROUND

A better understanding of the molecular basis of hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes such as hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome (HNPCC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) has profound consequences for both the diagnosis and (prophylactic) treatment of (pre)malignant neoplastic lesions.

DISCUSSION

Sequence analysis of the underlying genes for these conditions and the detection of disease-causing genetic alterations in an index patient enable predictive testing for individuals at risk within an affected family. However, the clinical implications of predictive molecular testing depend on the overall penetrance and variability in the expression of pathogenic mutations. The extent of these parameters differs considerably among the various known hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes. Hence the integration of genetic information into the daily surgical practice remains challenging.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides an update on the indications for family assessment, purpose and limitations of the genetic testing and resulting recommendations for prophylactic surgery in FAP and HNPCC.

Pathogenesis and clinical management of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is an inherited genetic condition associated with microsatellite instability; it accounts for around 5 per cent of all cases of colorectal cancer. This review examines recent data on management strategies for this condition.

METHODS

A Medline-based literature search was performed using the keywords 'HNPCC' and 'microsatellite instability'. Additional original papers were obtained from citations in articles identified by the initial search.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The Amsterdam criteria identify patients in whom the presence of an inherited mutation should be investigated. Those with a mutation should be offered counselling and screening. The role of prophylactic surgery has been superseded by regular colonoscopy, which dramatically reduces the risk of colorectal cancer. Screening for extracolonic malignancy is also advocated, but the benefits are uncertain. Chemoprevention may be of value in lowering the incidence of bowel cancer in affected patients, but further studies are required.

Report of 16 kindreds and one kindred with hMLH1 germline mutation

AIM: To analyze the diagnosis and treatment of 16 hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) kindreds, and to report the first kindred with hMLH1 germline mutation in Mainland China.

METHODS: The diagnosis, treatment and follow-up study of 16 HNPCC kindreds were retrospectively reviewed. Data concerning site of the malignant tumor, age at the diagnosis, history of synchronous and/or metachronous cancer, and histopathology of tumors were recorded. All treatments had won formal consent. PCR and SSCP were used to screen the coding region of hMLH1 and hMSH2 genes. Variant bands were sequenced by a 377 DNA sequencer.

RESULTS: Among sixteen kindreds, sixty-eight patients had a mean age of 50.8 years, including twenty-one multiple cancer patients and forty-six colorectal cancer patients (metachronous colorectal cancers in sixteen). A total of one hundred and one malignant neoplasms were found in these sixty-eight patients, including 50 colonic, 17 rectal, 11 gastric, 7 endometrial, and 4 esophageal cancers. 39.5% colorectal patients had metachronous cancers within ten years who needed reoperations. A germline G265T nonsense mutation was found in the third exon of hMLH1, resulting in a stop codon and truncated protein. Three phenotypically normal family members were also found to carry the mutated gene.

CONCLUSION: HNPCC is a typical auto-dominant hereditary disease, the main characteristics include early onset and frequency of cancers; predominance of colorectal, especially right-sided colon cancers; frequency of multiple primary cancers (especially colorectal cancers). Segmental resection for colorectal cancers is not eligible for colorectal cancer patient in HNPCC kindreds. Intensive follow-up is essential for all patients and possible gene carriers. The first HNPCC kindred with hMLH1 gene germline mutation was identified in Mainland China, and three phenotypically normal family members were found to be carriers of the mutated gene. The G265T germline (nonsense) mutation in the third exon of hMLH1 found here had not been reported previously in the literature.

Mismatch repair and the hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer syndrome (HNPCC)

The hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC)-syndrome is the most common form of hereditary colorectal cancers, and accounts for 2-7% of the total colorectal cancer burden. Since there are no single clinical features specific for HNPCC, diagnosis is based on family history (Amsterdam or Bethesda criteria) and is confirmed by the detection of a mutation in one of the responsible mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Two types of HNPCC-families can be distinguished. Type I HNPCC tumors are exclusively located in the colon, whereas in Type II HNPCC patients, extracolonic tumors are present in the stomach, endometrium, ovary, and urinary tract. The identification of the human homologues of yeast mismatch repair genes hMSH2, hMSH3, hMSH6, hMLH1, hMLH3, hPMS1 (scMLH2), and hPMS2 (scPMS1) offered the prospect of genetic screening leading to an extensive search for mutations in HNPCC-families. The majority of the alterations have been found in hMSH2 (40%) and hMLH1 (40%) genes. Mutations in the other MMR genes appear rare, absent, and/or associated with atypical families (1-5%). As a result of the mismatch repair deficiency, replication misincorporation errors accumulate, resulting in a mutator phenotype. Diagnosis of HNPCC-associated replication errors is most easily determined by the examination of a panel of the National Cancer Institute (NCI)-recommended simple repeated sequences (microsatellites), combined with immunohistochemical analysis. Although the exact molecular mechanism of the tumor development in these patients remains poorly understood, the identification of tumors that harbor a microsatellite instability has clinical and prognostic implications.

Hereditary cancer: family history, diagnosis, molecular genetics, ecogenetics, and management strategies

The translation of knowledge about hereditary breast cancer and its improved control, as well as prevention through prophylactic surgery, has been significantly accelerated through the veritable explosive discoveries in molecular genetics inclusive of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations. Needed however, among the physician community, medical geneticists, and genetic counselors, is a raised level of knowledge about hereditary breast cancer syndromes. Particular attention needs to be given to their extant genotypic and phenotypic heterogeneity, their natural history, and foremost, the requirement of a sufficiently detailed family history, with knowledge as to how to interpret its significance so that hereditary cancer syndrome can be diagnosed, should it, in fact, exist in the particular family. Collectively, surveillance and management programs can then be developed for the patient and his or her high-risk relatives. We believe very firmly that this knowledge needs to be extended to the individual patient(s), first- and second-degree relatives so that they can benefit from this knowledge.

Molecular genetics and endometrial cancer

Endometrial cancer is the ninth most common malignancy in females. Inherited forms of this malignancy exist. Mutations in mismatch repair genes result in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, which confers a lifetime risk of bowel cancer between 60-80% and an endometrial cancer risk of up to 60%. Current screening involves the use of transvaginal ultrasound and hysteroscopy. Genetic testing for mutations in the mismatch repair genes is available, and if a pathogenic change is found within a family, predictive testing becomes available for unaffected family members. If blood samples from family members are unavailable, tumour blocks may be studied to assess microsatellite instability, a feature of mismatch repair gene mutations. While mutations in the mismatch repair genes are found in inherited endometrial cancer they are rarely seen in sporadic cancers. However, there are a range of somatic gene mutations that are currently being studied in order to provide insight into the pathogenesis of endometrial cancer.