p53 nuclear overexpression may not be an independent prognostic marker in early colorectal cancer

Does anti-p53 antibody status predict for clinical outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, plus bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy?

BACKGROUND

TP53 gene mutation is widely known as one of the determinants of impaired chemosensitivity. p53 is a tumor-suppressor protein in humans encoded by the TP53 gene. Some studies have shown that TP53 gene mutation and accumulation of the p53 protein are closely related with serum anti-p53 antibody positivity. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive significance of the serum p53 antibody status in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, plus bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy.

METHODS

Ninety patients treated with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy were enrolled, including 70 whose KRAS genotype was revealed at the beginning of treatment. Before chemotherapy initiation, the serum p53 antibody level was quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using MESACUP® anti-p53 test kits. The cutoff value for positivity was 1.3 U/mL, as calculated previously. The KRAS genotype of the tumor samples was analyzed using the Luminex® assay.

RESULTS

Overall response rates of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria were 77.7 % (42/54) in anti-p53-negative patients and 69.4 % (25/36) in anti-p53-positive patients. The odds ratio was 1.07. Median overall survival was 36.1 months in the anti-p53-positive patients, and not available in the anti-p53-negative patients (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95 % confidence interval, 0.37-1.77; P = 0.61). The corresponding values for median progression-free survival were 13.3 months and 14.6 months (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95 % confidence interval, 0.41-1.17; P = 0.17), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum anti-p53 antibody positivity did not predict chemoresistance in mCRC treated with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, plus bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy.

The potential of carcinoembryonic antigen, p53, Ki-67 and glutathion Stransferase-π as clinico-histopathological markers for colorectal cancer

Objective

Colorectal cancer is one of the major contributors to cancer death worldwide. Lack of reliable colorectal cancer markers has hampered the management of these cancer patients. Our main purpose was to study the correlation between histopathological variables of colorectal adenocarcinomas and identify histopathological markers that are of prognostic value in patients with colorectal cancer.

Methods

In the present study, we examined the expression of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), p53, Ki-67 and glutathion Stransferase (GST) -π by using immunohistochemical staining methods in 126 colorectal carcinoma patients and evaluated the lymph node metastasis status in these patients by histopathological examination.

Results

The positive rates of CEA, p53, Ki-67 and GST-π expression in the colorectal cancer tissue specimens examined were 95.23%, 55.56%, 53.38% and 82.30%, respectively. Expression of p53 and Ki-67 was significantly correlated with the Dukes stages of the tumor, with higher levels of these proteins in Dukes'C and D tumors than those in Dukes' A and B tumors. Furthermore, the expression of p53, GST-π and Ki-67 correlated with prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer. Additionally, the expression of p53 in colorectal cancer was closely related to the expression of Ki-67 and the expression of GST-π was directly correlated with that of p53.

Conclusion

The expression of CEA, p53, Ki-67 and GST-π was correlated with various clinical features of patients with colorectal cancer. The combined use of these histopathological markers appeared to be a promising tool in predicting the prognosis of patients with this type of cancer.

p53 Nuclear accumulation and Bcl-2 expression in contiguous adenomatous components of colorectal adenocarcinomas predict aggressive tumor behavior

For subsets of colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC) patients, nuclear accumulation of p53 (p53(nac)) and Bcl-2 expression are prognostic indicators. To understand their role in the progression of CRC we evaluated 90 CRCs and their contiguous adenomatous components (CAdCs) for immunohistochemical expression of these markers. In general, p53(nac) and Bcl-2 expression was significantly increased when comparing normal colonic epithelia to CAdCs and CRCs. Thirteen (14%) CAdCs that demonstrated p53(nac) continued to express p53(nac) in their contiguous CRCs. A similar trend was observed in Bcl-2 expression in that the majority of CAdCs expressing Bcl-2 continued to express it in their matching CRCs (39/44). Patients whose CAdCs and their contiguous CRCs demonstrate p53(nac) had shorter median survival (35.9 months) than those patients whose CAdCs and CRCs did not (80.56 months). However, patients whose CAdCs had p53(nac) and lacked Bcl-2 expression had the lowest median survival (15.74 months) when compared with patients whose CAdCs did not demonstrate p53(nac) but had increased expression of Bcl-2 (71.77 months). These findings suggest that in those adenomas that demonstrate p53(nac) but lack Bcl-2 expression, their contiguous CRCs are more likely to be aggressive as they progress.

Prognostic significance of bcl-2 and p53 expression in colorectal carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to detect the expression of bcl-2 and p53 proteins in colorectal carcinomas and to determine their association with the patient survival and stage of the diseases.

METHODS

Immunohistochemistry method was used to detect the expression of bcl-2 and p53 proteins in 93 cases of colorectal carcinoma. The stain results were obtained by analyzing the clinic-pathological characteristics of patients.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven percent (53/93) of the colorectal carcinomas were bcl-2 protein positive. The positive rate of bcl-2 protein in lymph node involvement cases was lower (15/37) than the cases without node involvement (38/58, P<0.01). The positive rate of p53 protein was 43% (40/93) in colon-rectum carcinomas. No significant correlation was observed between p53 protein expression and clinic-pathological manifestations (P>0.05) but the survival was significantly worse (P=0.0001) in the p53 protein positive cases. Neither bcl-2 nor p53 alone was correlated with stage of the disease. When combined bcl-2/p53 status was analyzed, a group with bcl-2(+) and p53(-) had the best prognosis. This group was significantly associated with earlier Dukes' stages (P=0.1763). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, lymph node involvement and p53 protein expression were two independent factors correlated with survival time.

CONCLUSION

The expression of bcl-2 and p53 represent biological characteristics of colorectal carcinomas. Assessment of both bcl-2 and p53 status may be valuable in predicting the prognosis of patients.

Molecular lesions in colorectal cancer: impact on prognosis? Original data and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

In the Dukes' B and C stages of colorectal carcinoma there are considerable variations in the observed courses of the disease. Since post-operative chemotherapy in patients with Dukes' C (node-positive) colon carcinoma has been demonstrated to be effective in improving overall-survival, a more exact prognosis assessment gains additional significance and therapeutic relevance.

DISCUSSION

One also hopes to derive improved prognostic factors from the clarification of the molecular pathogenesis. Because of its frequency and the accessibility and recognizability of its developmental stages colorectal carcinoma is among the best investigated of all solid tumors. Despite a multitude of suggested molecular candidate markers none of these changes has yet been able enter the everyday life of the clinic. However, it is to be expected that some of the molecular alterations presently discussed will gain importance before long in the clinical treatment of patients with colorectal carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

Considering also our own findings, this review presents the latest developments in the scientific discussion of the tumor suppressor/oncogenes p53, k-ras, and DCC, biochemical determinants of the 5-fluorouracil metabolism, and defects of the DNA repair system.

What we could do now: molecular pathology of colorectal cancer

The contribution of molecular genetics to colorectal cancer has been largely restricted to relatively rare inherited tumours and to the detection of germ line mutations predisposing to these cancers. However, much is now known about the somatic events leading to colorectal cancer in general. Several studies have examined the relation between genetic features and prognosis. The purpose of this article is to review these studies and summarise the current state of this subject. Although many of the published studies are small and inconclusive, it is clear that several different pathways exist for the development of this cancer, and some molecular characteristics seem to correlate with clinicopathological features. At present, studies are confined to evaluating a small number of molecular markers; however, with the advent of methods for the rapid genetic profiling of large numbers of colorectal cancers, it will be possible to evaluate fully the clinical usefulness of a range of colorectal cancer genotypes.

Mutations and allelic loss of p53 in primary tumor DNA from potentially cured patients with colorectal carcinoma

PURPOSE

To compare p53 alterations in survivors and nonsurvivors after surgery for colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-nine potentially cured patients with colorectal carcinoma, without recurrent disease for more than 6 years after their primary surgery, were selected to match a group of 41 colorectal cancer patients with early metastatic spread to the liver. All patients were screened for mutations in the p53 gene, exons 5 to 9, by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and subsequent sequencing.

RESULTS

The frequency of p53 mutations was significantly different in cured patients (60%) compared with patients with early relapse (41%, P <.05). A significant difference was found in the distribution of mutations, indicating that potentially cured patients had a different proportion of mutations in conserved regions of p53 (P =.02). This difference was explained by a significantly different frequency of mutations in exon 8 (40% v 15%, P =.03), which is part of the conserved region V. All mutations in region V were codon 273 mutations in cured patients, whereas three of four mutations were located in codon 273 in patients with metastatic disease. Allelic loss of p53 (loss of heterozygosity [LOH]) was demonstrated in 26% of the cured patients and in 39% of patients with metastatic disease (P =.36). The combination of mutation and LOH of p53 was the same (17%) in both groups.

CONCLUSION

A large number of p53 mutations in colorectal cancer do not promote disease progression. Some mutations, particularly within conserved regions, may even counteract negative functional effects of other p53 structural alterations. A complete loss of p53 function was not related to survival or progression after curative operation of colorectal carcinoma.

[Expression of p21 WAF1/CIP1 protein in colorectal cancers: study of its relation to p53 mutation and Ki67 antigen expression]

Mutations of the p53 gene are the most common genetic alteration in malignant human tumors. A cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, p21WAF1/CIP1, is thought to be an important mediator of p53-induced cell cycle arrest. Although numerous studies have reported p53 expression and mutation in colorectal cancer few of them have correlated p53 expression with that of its downstream effector p21 and with the proliferation index as measured by expression of the Ki67 nuclear antigen. We studied p53, p21 and Ki67 expression by immunohistochemistry and molecular biology in 35 colorectal carcinomas. We compared these findings with each other and with clinical factors. Sixty three percent of tumors expressed p53 whereas seventy one percent expressed p21WAF1/CIP1. In adenocarcinomas, p21 staining was heterogeneous: p21-reactive cells were seen in the most differentiated areas. There was no correlation between p21WAF1/CIP1 and p53 expression, p53 mutation, Ki67 expression or clinical factors such as sex or location of the tumor. On the other hand, there was a statistical relationship between p21 expression and survival: our results indicated an association between high p21 expression and lower stages p21WAF1/CIP1 appears to be induced independently of p53 in these tumors and may be associated with differentiation rather than proliferation.

The results of colorectal cancer treatment by p53 status: treatment-specific overview

PURPOSE

Both negative and positive influences of mutant p53 on treatment outcome have been reported, and we present here a meta-analysis of published studies where outcome was reported for defined treatment groups.

METHODS

We identified articles on the effect of p53 status by treatment modality, excluding those not stratified by method of treatment. A common hazard ratio was estimated from studies that reported a multivariate analysis. We also estimated the numbers of patients expressing the endpoint at the mean or median follow-up time and calculated a pooled odds ratio.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight articles were evaluable (23 using immunohistochemistry to detect overexpression of p53 and 8 using DNA sequencing), for a total of 4,416 patients. For patients treated with surgery only, the immunohistochemistry studies showed a significant influence of p53 status on disease-free survival and a marginally significant influence on overall survival. In the studies using DNA sequencing, by contrast, there was a significant influence of p53 mutations on overall survival, but not disease-free survival. For patients treated with surgery and radiotherapy, the influence of p53 status on disease-free survival was either insignificant or marginally significant, depending on test used; there was no influence on overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this pooled analysis of published studies where treatment was accounted for shows that there is a borderline significant hazard associated with p53 overexpression or mutation vs. p53 wild-type, it is unlikely that p53 can be applied in a routine clinical setting alongside factors such as T stage, nodal status, and residual tumor, whose prognostic value is much stronger.

Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. Literature review for clinical application

PURPOSE

Identification of prognostic factors is a primary basis for planning the treatment and predicting the outcome of patients with colorectal cancer. Reviewing studies from the literature performed using univariate and multivariate analyses and their own study, the authors critically discuss the prognostic value of the clinicopathologic parameters of the tumor.

METHODS

Among 853 patients with colorectal tumors seen at the Department of Clinical Surgery of the Catholic University of Rome, Italy, 690 cases that were curatively resected the study. Overall survival rate, related to the clinicopathologic variables, was calculated, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Five-year and ten-year overall survival rates were 70 and 55 percent, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that node involvement, distant metastases, bowel obstruction, and patient gender are factors independently related to outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Data from the literature and the present study suggest that only a few clinical parameters, particularly bowel obstruction, and some pathologic factors (tumor stage, vessels invasion, and tumor ploidy) are related to patient survival rate and are the most reliable prognostic criteria. In prospective clinical studies, any other new pathologic or molecular factors should be matched with these parameters to confirm their value in outcome prediction.

Early colorectal cancer: recognition, classification and treatment

BACKGROUND

With the introduction of colorectal cancer screening and improvements in endoscopic technology, the recognition and management of early colorectal cancer assumes increasing importance.

METHODS

A literature review was undertaken using Medline (National Library of Medicine, Washington DC, USA) searches of the headings early colonic, colorectal and rectal cancer, carcinoma and adenocarcinoma up to and including 1997. All relevant references were examined.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The diagnosis, classification and treatment options are described. Accurate diagnosis, preoperative and histopathological staging is crucial in the management of early colorectal cancer.

Genetic prognostic markers in colorectal cancer

The contribution of molecular genetics to colorectal cancer has been restricted largely to relatively rare inherited tumours and to the detection of germline mutations predisposing to these cancers. However, much is now also known about somatic events leading to colorectal cancer. A number of studies has been undertaken examining possible relations between genetic features and prognostic indices. While many of these studies are small and inconclusive, it is clear that a number of different pathways exist for the development of this cancer and some molecular characteristics correlate with clinicopathological features. With the advent of methods for the rapid genotyping of large numbers of colorectal cancers, it should be possible to evaluate fully the clinical usefulness of colorectal cancer genotypes through multivariate analyses.

Molecular biology of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in Western populations. This cancer develops as a result of the pathologic transformation of normal colonic epithelium to an adenomatous polyp and ultimately an invasive cancer. The multistep progression requires years and possibly decades and is accompanied by a number of recently characterized genetic alterations. Mutations in two classes of genes, tumor-suppressor genes and proto-oncogenes, are thought to impart a proliferative advantage to cells and contribute to development of the malignant phenotype. Inactivating mutations of both copies (alleles) of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene--a tumor-suppressor gene on chromosome 5q--mark one of the earliest events in colorectal carcinogenesis. Germline mutation of the APC gene and subsequent somatic mutation of the second APC allele cause the inherited familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome. This syndrome is characterized by the presence of hundreds to thousands of colonic adenomatous polyps. If these polyps are left untreated, colorectal cancer develops. Mutation leading to dysregulation of the K-ras protooncogene is also thought to be an early event in colon cancer formation. Conversely, loss of heterozygosity on the long arm of chromosome 18 (18q) occurs later in the sequence of development from adenoma to carcinoma, and this mutation may predict poor prognosis. Loss of the 18q region is thought to contribute to inactivation of the DCC tumor-suppressor gene. More recent evidence suggests that other tumor-suppressor genes--DPC4 and MADR2 of the transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) pathway--also may be inactivated by allelic loss on chromosome 18q. In addition, mutation of the tumor-suppressor gene p53 on chromosome 17p appears to be a late phenomenon in colorectal carcinogenesis. This mutation may allow the growing tumor with multiple genetic alterations to evade cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Neoplastic progression is probably accompanied by additional, undiscovered genetic events, which are indicated by allelic loss on chromosomes 1q, 4p, 6p, 8p, 9q, and 22q in 25% to 50% of colorectal cancers. Recently, a third class of genes, DNA repair genes, has been implicated in tumorigenesis of colorectal cancer. Study findings suggest that DNA mismatch repair deficiency, due to germline mutation of the hMSH2, hMLH1, hPMS1, or hPMS2 genes, contributes to development of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. The majority of tumors in patients with this disease and 10% to 15% of sporadic colon cancers display microsatellite instability, also know as the replication error positive (RER+) phenotype. This molecular marker of DNA mismatch repair deficiency may predict improved patient survival. Mismatch repair deficiency is thought to lead to mutation and inactivation of the genes for type II TGF-beta receptor and insulin-like growth-factor II receptor. Individuals from families at high risk for colorectal cancer (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer or familial adenomatous polyposis) should be offered genetic counseling, predictive molecular testing, and when indicated, endoscopic surveillance at appropriate intervals. Recent studies have examined colorectal carcinogenesis in the light of other genetic processes. Telomerase activity is present in almost all cancers, including colorectal cancer, but rarely in benign lesions such as adenomatous polyps or normal tissues. Furthermore, genetic alterations that allow transformed colorectal epithelial cells to escape cell cycle arrest or apoptosis also have been recognized. In addition, hypomethylation or hypermethylation of DNA sequences may alter gene expression without nucleic acid mutation.

Coexpression of Bcl-2, c-Myc, and p53 oncoproteins as prognostic discriminants in patients with colorectal carcinoma

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to evaluate the clinical use of Bcl-2, c-Myc, and p53 oncoproteins, either singly or in combination, as prognostic discriminants relative to recurrence and overall survival in patients with Dukes B or C colorectal carcinoma.

METHODS

Analyses were made on archival pathology tissues of 48 patients with colorectal cancer. The oncoproteins were localized using commercially available monoclonal antibodies: clone 124 for Bcl-2, 9E11 for c-Myc, and DO-7 for p53. The avidin-biotin peroxidase complex method was used. Patients were followed up for a period of 2 to 36 months.

RESULTS

Expression of Bcl-2 and c-Myc was cytoplasmic, whereas nuclear p53 immunoreactivity was localized in the tumor cells. Sixty percent (29/48), 65 percent (31/48), and 37 percent (18/48) of the tumors showed overexpression of Bcl-2, c-Myc, and p53 oncoproteins, respectively. Fifty-four percent (18/33) and 100 percent (9/9) of moderately and poorly differentiated tumors, respectively, were positive for Bcl-2 (P < 0.01). No such correlation was noted for c-Myc and p53 oncoproteins. Univariate analysis showed that patients with Bcl-2 and c-Myc overexpression were associated with poorer overall survival than patients with Bcl-2-negative (P < 0.0124) and c-Myc-negative (P < 0.036) tumors. In addition, when patients were subgrouped according to Dukes stage, a statistically significant poorer overall survival was observed in Dukes C patients with Bcl-2-positive tumors (P < 0.017). Furthermore, multivariate analysis revealed that coexpression of three oncoproteins was predictive of a worse prognosis than for those individuals expressing none of the oncoproteins (P < 0.031) and only one positive oncoprotein (P < 0.014).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that oncoprotein coexpression possesses significant prognostic and potential therapeutic value; incorporation of molecular markers into future prospective randomized trials is advisable.

Prognostic significance of Bcl-2 expression and p53 nuclear accumulation in colorectal adenocarcinoma

The products of bcl-2 and p53 genes are involved in the regulation of apoptosis and proliferation and have been associated with prognosis in several malignancies, including colorectal adenocarcinoma. Although 2 European studies have reported a prognostic significance of Bcl-2 expression in colorectal adenocarcinomas, a study from the United States did not observe such an association. Therefore, we used immunohistochemistry to evaluate the prognostic significance of Bcl-2 expression, p53 nuclear accumulation and their concomitant expression in 134 US patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma. Antigen retrieval was required for adequate detection of Bcl-2 expression. Fifty percent of the colorectal tumors were classified as expressing Bcl-2, and Bcl-2 expression was associated with longer patient survival. Antigen retrieval was not necessary for detecting nuclear accumulation of p53 by immunohistochemistry. Nuclear accumulation of p53 was detected in 44% of colorectal adenocarcinomas and was associated with decreased patient survival. Tumors that did not express detectable levels of Bcl-2 but exhibited nuclear accumulation of p53 were associated with the shortest patient survival (log rank, p = 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that Bcl-2 expression (p = 0.018), p53 nuclear accumulation (p = 0.024) and regional lymph-node metastasis (p = 0.005) were independent prognostic factors. Although a trend toward an inverse correlation between Bcl-2 and p53 expression was observed, the prognostic value of Bcl-2 expression was independent of p53 status. Thus, assessment of both Bcl-2 and p53 status may be valuable in predicting the prognosis of patients with colorectal adenocarcinomas.

Association between sucrase-isomaltase and p53 expression in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Sucrase-isomaltase (SI) is a tissue-based phenotypic marker that is an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer (CRC). DF3 and galectin 3 are two other tissue-based markers that are upregulated during neoplastic transformation. Because p53 mutations are acquired during neoplastic progression, we reasoned that alterations in SI and p53 may be associated despite an apparent lack of biological interaction.

METHODS

Paraffin sections from 183 patients who underwent surgery at New England Deaconess Hospital (NEDH) between 1965 and 1977 were analyzed first by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the expression of the markers SI, DF3, and galectin 3, which were scored as absent or present. Paraffin sections from a second group of 59 patients who underwent surgery at NEDH between 1985 and 1992 were analyzed by IHC for the expression of p53 as well as SI, DF3, and galectin 3. p53 nuclear staining was scored as absent or present. Previous work has shown that p53 is mutated in all cells with nuclear staining and in 10% of tumors that are unstained.

RESULTS

SI expression was not associated with the expression of either DF3 or galectin 3, and neither DF3 nor galectin 3 were prognostic factors in CRC. None of the phenotypic markers were associated with any of the clinicopathologic variables. However, 21 of 24 p53-positive cases (88%) expressed SI, whereas 15 of 35 p53-negative cases (43%) were also SI negative (p = 0.02, Fisher exact test). p53 expression was not associated with expression of DF3 or galectin 3.

CONCLUSIONS

SI expression and p53 mutation are associated significantly in CRC. Although the mechanism underlying such an association in presently unknown, the association may define a subset of patients with a worse prognosis.