Coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Long-term results at the Mayo and Cleveland Clinics

Functional outcomes and local control are acceptable following hand-sewn colo-anal anastomoses for rectal cancer: Results of long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Rectal cancer that grows so close to the anal canal that an adequate distal margin cannot be achieved with a double-stapled anastomosis (DSA) has been managed with abdominoperineal resection. Inter-sphincteric dissection and hand-sewn colo-anal anastomoses (HSCAA) allows anastomosis in some cases where DSA is impossible. There are concerns that HSCAA may lead to complications, local recurrence and poor continence. Our aim was to assess our experience with HSCAA in terms of recurrence, complications, continence and quality of life.

METHODS

Consecutive patients at two metropolitan hospitals who underwent an ultra-low anterior resection with hand-sewn colo-anal anastomoses for low rectal cancer during a 10-year period were asked to complete a questionnaire which allowed continence and quality-of-life scores to be calculated. Recurrence and complication rates were obtained from a retrospective medical record review.

RESULTS

A total of 26 patients underwent HSCAA. Six patients were not sent a questionnaire (3 deaths, 1 with ileostomy, 1 with ileostomy reversal within 3 months and one who had transferred care to another hospital). Fifteen patients returned questionnaires. Local recurrence occurred in zero cases. Two developed systemic recurrence. Four patients developed anastomotic stricture and three had anastomotic leak. Median Faecal Incontinence Severity Index score was 28 and median FIQoL scores were 3.00, 2.78, 3.86 and 3.00. One patient wished that they had had a permanent stoma rather than anastomosis.

CONCLUSION

HSCAA delivered good local control of rectal cancer and high avoidance of permanent stoma. Faecal continence is impaired; however, the results are acceptable to the majority of patients.

[Surgical treatment of low anterior resection syndrome]

OBJECTIVE

To compare functional outcomes of various rectal reconstruction after total mesorectal excision.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective randomized trial included 90 patients with mid-to-low rectal carcinoma who underwent total mesorectal excision.

RESULTS

There were 22 patients after J-pouch surgery, 30 patients with side-to-end anastomoses and 38 patients with end-to-end anastomoses. Eight patients (26.6%) required conversion of J-P to E-E (7 patients) and S-E (1) anastomosis for technical reasons. Postoperative morbidity was similar (13.6, 16.7 and 34.2% in J-P, S-E and E-E groups, respectively, p=0.705). Sensory threshold, earliest and constant defecation urge and maximal tolerable volume were higher for J-P surgery within 3-6-12 months after surgery. Stool frequency was significantly lower after J-P surgery compared to S-E and E-E anastomoses within 3-6-12 months. Wexner scores were 3, 5, 6 after 6 months (p<0.05) and 0, 1, 1 after 12 months for J-P, S-E and E-E, respectively (p>0.05). Evacuation dysfunction was observed in 59.1% with J-P, 33.3% with S-E and 21.1% with E-E anastomoses in 6 months after stoma closure.

CONCLUSION

J-pouch reconstruction demonstrates higher neorectal volume that ensures reduced stool frequency up to 12 months after stoma closure. However, technical challenges of J-pouch surgery and evacuation dysfunction restrain application of this procedure in clinical practice.

Quality of life in rectal cancer surgery: What do the patient ask?

Rectal cancer surgery has dramatically changed with the introduction of the total mesorectal excision (TME), which has demonstrated to significantly reduce the risk of local recurrence. The combination of TME with radiochemotherapy has led to a reduction of local failure to less than 5%. On the other hand, surgery for rectal cancer is also impaired by the potential for a significant loss in quality of life. This is a new challenge surgeons should think about nowadays: If patients live more, they also want to live better. The fight against cancer cannot only be based on survival, recurrence rate and other oncological endpoints. Patients are also asking for a decent quality of life. Rectal cancer is probably a paradigmatic example: Its treatment is often associated with the loss or severe impairment of faecal function, alteration of body anatomy, urogenital problems and, sometimes, intractable pain. The evolution of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the last decades is an important example, which emphasizes the importance that themes like scar, recovery, pain and quality of life might play for patients. The attention to quality of life from both patients and surgeons led to several surgical innovations in the treatment of rectal cancer: Sphincter saving procedures, reservoir techniques (pouch and coloplasty) to mitigate postoperative faecal disorders, nerve-sparing techniques to reduce the risk for sexual dysfunction. Even more conservative procedures have been proposed alternatively to the abdominal-perineal resection, like the local excisions or transanal endoscopic microsurgery, till the possibility of a wait and see approach in selected cases after radiation therapy.

Laparoscopic resection for middle and low rectal cancer

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the technical feasibility, safety and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic resection for middle and low rectal cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2004 to December 2011, review of prospectively collected database revealed a series of 97 laparoscopic resections for middle and low rectal cancer within 10 cm from the anal verge. Five patients with multiple primary cancers were excluded. Operation time, intra-operative blood loss, surgical complications, duration of hospital stay, retrieved lymph nodes, tumour, node, metastasis (TNM) stage and recurrence were retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

Tumours were located within 5 cm of the anal verge in 28 patients (30.4%) and from 5 cm to 10 cm in 64 patients (69.6%). Abdominoperineal resection was performed in 12 patients (13%), and conversion to open surgery was necessary in four patients (4.3%). The mean operation time was 199.7 min (range 105-450 min) and the mean intra-operative blood loss was 169.9 mL (range 20-800 mL). The mean hospital stay was 11.8 days (range 5-45 days) and a mean of 12.2 lymph nodes were retrieved. The incidence of surgical complications was 11.9%, including anastomosis site leakage in five patients (5.4%). There were no mortalities resulting from laparoscopic surgery. The median follow-up period was 28.4 months (range 7-85 months). Recurrence occurred in eight patients (8.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic resection can be applied for middle and low rectal cancers with acceptable surgical and oncological outcomes.

Update and debate issues in surgical treatment of middle and low rectal cancer

Based on a review of the literature, this paper provides an update on surgical treatment of middle and low rectal cancer and discusses issues of debate surrounding that treatment. The main goal of the surgical treatment of rectal cancer is radical resection of the tumor and surrounding lymphatic tissue. Local excision of early rectal cancer can be another treatment option, in which the patient can avoid possible complications related to radical surgery. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) has been recommended for patients with cT3-4N0 or any T N+ rectal cancer because CRT shows better local control and less toxicity than adjuvant CRT. However, recent clinical trials showed promising results for local excision after neoadjuvant CRT in selected patients with low rectal cancer. In addition, the "wait and see" concept is another modality that has been reported for the management of tumors that show complete clinical remission after neoadjuvant CRT. Although radical surgery for middle and low rectal cancer is the cornerstone therapy, an ultralow anterior resection with or without intersphincteric resection (ISR) has become an alternative standard surgical method for selected patients. Many studies have reported on the oncological safety of the ISR, but few of them have addressed the issue the functional outcome. Furthermore, an abdominoperineal resection (APR) has problems with high rates of tumor perforations and positive circumferential resection margins, and those factors have contributed to its having a high rate of local recurrence and a poor survival rate for rectal cancer compared with sphincter-saving procedures. Recently, great efforts have been made to reduce these problems, and the total levator excision or the extended APR concept has emerged. Surgical management for low rectal cancer should aim to radically excise the tumor and to preserve as much of the sphincter function as possible by using multidisciplinary approaches. However, further prospective clinical trials are needed for tailored treatment of rectal cancer patients.

External coloanal anastomosis without covering stoma in low-lying rectal cancer

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and functional outcome of external coloanal anastomosis without covering stoma in treating low-lying rectal cancer. All patients undergoing the coloanal anastomosis for low lying rectal carcer in the Department of General Surgery, Minia University Hospital, between May 2006 and May 2009 were included. Seventy two patients underwent coloanal anastomosis, and follow up was available for all patients. Mean follow up period was 12.6 ± 4.7 months. Postoperatively, fecal continence was normal in 84.7% of patients. Postoperative complications included anastomotic fistula in 3 patients (4.2%) and anastomotic stenosis in 6 patients (8.3%). There was no effect of pre or postoperative adjuvant therapy on the procedure outcome. There was no local recurrence during follow up period. Three patients died at the end of follow up period due to distant metastasis. In treatment of low-lying rectal cancer, abdominoperineal resection should be avoided if coloanal anastomosis provides similar control of the disease as it is safe and has good functional results and acceptable complication rate.

Permanent stoma after low anterior resection for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A low anterior resection procedure for removing a rectal tumor aims to preserve the sphincter and avoid a permanent stoma. Permanent stomas are primarily necessary in cases of poor anorectal function and local recurrence. The aim of this study was to clarify whether anastomosis-related complications and local recurrence influenced the rate of permanent stomas in a long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Of 1032 consecutive patients with rectal cancer, 397 were treated by low anterior resection (R0 and R1 resections) between 1985 and 2007 at the Department of General and Abdominal Surgery of the University Hospital, Mainz (Germany). All patient data were collected prospectively. A retrospective, multivariate analysis was conducted to determine factors that influenced the occurrence of delayed and nonreversal of defunctioning stoma, the rate of repeat stoma after closure, and the need for a permanent stoma in patients whose stomas were not initially defunctioning.

RESULTS

A defunctioning stoma was created in 292 of 397 patients (74%); 12% of stomas were not reversible (33/279 that survived the operation >90 d); 11% (28/246) required a repeat stoma after stoma closure; 10% (10/105) of patients whose stomas were not initially defunctioning received a late permanent stoma. The overall rate of a permanent stoma was 18%. The main reasons for a permanent stoma were anastomosis-related complications and local recurrence. Risk factors for anastomosis-related complication were male gender, low tumor site, and tumor stage. Despite a significant reduction in local recurrence rates from 1997 to 2007, the rate of creating a permanent stoma did not change.

CONCLUSIONS

The possibility of a permanent stoma should be considered when planning surgery for treating rectal cancer. It might be preferable in older patients, in poor condition and with more advanced rectal cancers, to consider an abdominoperineal resection or Hartmann procedure instead of a low anterior resection.

Anastomotic leak rate and outcome for laparoscopic intra-corporeal stapled anastomosis

AIMS

A prospective clinical audit of all patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery with the intention of primary colonic left-sided intracorporeal stapled anastomosis to identify the rate of anastomotic leaks on an intention to treat basis with or without defunctioning stoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery resulting in left-sided stapled anastomosis were included with no selection criteria applied. All operations were conducted by the same surgical team and the same preparation and intraoperative methods were used. The factors analyzed for this audit were patient demographics (age and sex), indication for operation, procedure performed, height of anastomosis, leak rate and the outcome, inpatient stay, mortality, rate of defunctioning stomas, and rate of conversion to open procedure. Results for anastomotic leakage were compared with known results from the Wessex Colorectal Audit for open colorectal surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 69 patients (43 females, 26 males; median age 69 years, range 19 - 86 years) underwent colonic procedures with left-sided intracorporeal stapled anastomoses. Of these, 14 patients underwent reversal of Hartmann's, 42 - Anterior Resection, 11 - Sigmoid Colectomy, 2 - Left Hemicolectomy. Excluding reversals of Hartmann's, 29 operations were performed for malignant and 26 for benign disease. Five patients were defunctioned, and 3 were subsequently reversed. The median height of anastomosis was 12 cm, range 4 - 18 cm from anal verge as measured either intra-operatively, or by rigid sigmoidoscopy post-operatively. Four cases were converted to open surgery. There was 1 post-operative death within 30 days. There was 1 anastomotic leak (the patient that died), and 1 patient developed a colo-vesical fistula. Median post-operative stay was 7 days, range 2-19.

CONCLUSION

This clinical audit confirms that the anastomotic leak rate for left-sided colorectal stapled anastomosis is no worse than that for open surgery. Therefore the decision making process for defunctioning stoma should be guided by the same principles as open surgery.

Reconstructive techniques after rectal resection for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Total mesorectal resection (TME) has led to improved survival and reduced local recurrence in patients with rectal cancer. Straight coloanal anastomosis after TME can lead to problems with frequent bowel movements, fecal urgency and incontinence. The colonic J pouch, side-to-end anastomosis and transverse coloplasty have been developed as alternative surgical strategies in order to improve bowel function.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to determine which rectal reconstructive technique results in the best postoperative bowel function.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A systematic search of the literature (MEDLINE, Cancerlit, Embase and Cochrane Databases) was conducted from inception to Feb 14, 2006 by two independent investigators.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials in which patients with rectal cancer undergoing low rectal resection and coloanal anastomosis were randomized to at least two different anastomotic techniques. Furthermore, a measure of postoperative bowel function was necessary for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Studies identified for potential inclusion were independently assessed for eligibility by at least two reviewers. Data from included trials was collected using a standardized data collection form. Data was collated and qualitatively summarized for bowel function outcomes and meta-analysis statistical techniques were used to pool data on postoperative complications.

MAIN RESULTS

Of 2609 relevant studies, 16 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met our inclusion criteria. Nine RCTs (n=473) compared straight coloanal anastomosis (SCA) to the colonic J pouch (CJP). Up to 18 months postoperatively, the CJP was superior to SCA in most studies in bowel frequency, urgency, fecal incontinence and use of antidiarrheal medication. There were too few patients with long-term bowel function outcomes to determine if this advantage continued after 18 months postop. Four RCTs (n=215) compared the side-to-end anastomosis (STE) to the CJP. These studies showed no difference in bowel function outcomes between these two techniques. Similarly, three RCTs (n=158) compared transverse coloplasty (TC) to CJP. Similarly, there were no differences in bowel function outcomes in these small studies. Overall, there were no significant differences in postoperative complications with any of the anastomotic strategies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In several randomized controlled trials, the CJP has been shown to be superior to the SCA in bowel function outcomes in patients with rectal cancer for at least 18 months after gastrointestinal continuity is re-established. The TC and STE anastomoses have been shown to have similar bowel function outcomes when compared to the CJP in small randomized controlled trials; further study is necessary to determine the role of these alternative coloanal anastomotic strategies.

[Not Available]

OBJECTIVES

A prospective audit of all patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery with the intention of primary colonic left-sided intracorporeal stapled anastomosis to identify the clinical anastomotic leak rate on an intention to treat basis.

METHODS

All patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery resulting in left-sided stapled anastomosis were included. All operations were conducted by the same surgical team with the same pre-operative preparation and surgical technique. The factors analysed for this audit were patient demographics (age and sex), indication for operation, procedure performed, height of anastomosis, leak rate and the outcome, inpatient stay, mortality, rate of defunctioning stomas, and rate of conversion to open procedure.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients (49 females, 35 males; median age 70 years, range 19-89 years) underwent colonic procedures with left-sided intracorporeal stapled anastomosis. An intra-operative air leak was evident in one patient, whose anastomosis was oversewn intracorporeally and defunctioned by ileostomy. There were only two clinically evident anastomotic leaks post-operatively (2.9%). One patient died of overwhelming sepsis within 48h of re-operation: Seven patients (8.3%) had a primary defunctioning stoma, with two further stomas formed due to anastomotic leakage. Five cases (6%) were converted to open surgery. The median post-operative stay was six days, range 2-23. Thirty-day mortality was 50% in the leak group and 0% in the non-leak group.

CONCLUSION

We believe that this study demonstrates that the anastomotic leak rate from intra-corporeal laparoscopic anastomosis is no greater than for open surgery or laparoscopic surgery with extra-corporeal anastomosis.

Evaluation of selective defunctioning stoma after low anterior resection for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leakage is a major concern after resection for low rectal cancer. Therefore, the use of a defunctioning stoma (DS) has been suggested, but limited data exist to clearly determine the necessity of a routine diversion. In our department, the indication of DS was evaluated subjectively by the operating surgeon. The aim of this study was to evaluate the selective use of fecal diversion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective chart review of patients who underwent low anterior resection for carcinoma was performed. The incidence and consequences of clinical leaks were determined in these patients who were considered in two groups: defunctioning stoma and no defunctioning stoma.

RESULTS

From 1995 to 2005, 132 consecutive patients underwent low anterior resection; a DS was performed in 42 patients (31.8%). Median level of anastomosis was 4 cm in both groups. Overall clinical leakage rate was 9.8%: 7.1% (n = 3) with a DS and 11% (n = 10) without a stoma. Mortality rate was 1.5% (n = 2), both in the unprotected group. No patient in the diversion group required a permanent stoma, contrasting with four unprotected patients in which continuity could not be restored after break down of the anastomosis.

CONCLUSION

Finding lower clinical leakage rate in a probable higher risk group and better outcome when a leak occurs in our study constituted strong evidence of the effectiveness of a DS. Selective use of a DS based on subjective assessment at the time of surgery could not allow experienced surgeons to perform single-stage procedure safely. Construction of a DS seems useful for patients with distal rectal cancer.

Intersphincteric resection in patients with very low rectal cancer: a review of the Japanese experience

PURPOSE

This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility and oncologic and functional outcomes of intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer.

METHODS

A feasibility study was performed using 213 specimens from abdominoperineal resections of rectal cancer. Oncologic and functional outcomes were investigated in 228 patients with rectal cancer located <5 cm from the anal verge who underwent intersphincteric resection at seven institutions in Japan between 1995 and 2004.

RESULTS

Curative operations were accomplished by intersphincteric resection in 86 percent of patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection. Complete microscopic curative surgery was achieved by intersphincteric resection in 225 of 228 patients. Morbidity was 24 percent, and mortality was 0.4 percent. During the median observation time of 41 months, rate of local recurrence was 5.8 percent at three years, and five-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 91.9 percent and 83.2 percent, respectively. In 181 patients who received stoma closure, 68 percent displayed good continence, and only 7 percent showed worsened continence at 24 months after stoma closure. Patients with total intersphincteric resection displayed significantly worse continence than patients with partial or subtotal resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Curability with intersphincteric resection was verified histologically, and acceptable oncologic and functional outcomes were obtained by using these procedures in patients with very low rectal cancer. However, information on potential functional adverse effects after intersphincteric resection should be provided to patients preoperatively.

Long-term functional and quality of life outcomes after coloanal anastomosis for distal rectal cancer

PURPOSE

This study was designed to evaluate the long-term functional and quality-of-life outcomes of patients after coloanal anastomosis for distal rectal cancer.

METHODS

A total of 192 patients underwent coloanal anastomosis between 1982 and 2001 at two tertiary referral institutions. Standardized and validated questionnaires to assess functional and quality-of-life outcomes were mailed to 151 patients, of which 121 patients responded (median follow-up, 65 months).

RESULTS

Patients receiving pelvic radiotherapy had more bowel function problems than patients who did not receive pelvic radiotherapy. No significant differences in relevant functional and quality-of-life outcomes were seen among patients who received preoperative or postoperative pelvic radiotherapy. Patients requiring permanent diversion as a result of complications of the surgery had decreased quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Coloanal anastomosis for distal rectal cancer has favorable long-term outcomes. Pelvic radiotherapy has an adverse effect on subsequent bowel function (whether given preoperatively or postoperatively) in patients who maintain intestinal continuity. Loss of intestinal continuity after a coloanal anastomosis is associated with diminished quality of life.

The influence of abdomino-peranal (intersphincteric) resection of lower third rectal carcinoma on the rates of sphincter preservation and locoregional recurrence

OBJECTIVE

The most extended form of rectal resection, representing the very last option for sphincter preservation is abdomino-peranal intersphincteric resection for tumours of the lower third which otherwise would not be resectable with preservation of the sphincter by an abdominal approach alone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The data of 476 patients with a carcinoma in the lower third of the rectum who underwent primary treatment for stage I-III disease by low anterior resection, abdomino-peranal (intersphincteric) resection or abdominoperineal excision between 1985 and 2001 were analysed. The time periods 1985-94 and 1995-2001 were compared.

RESULTS

The rate of intersphincteric resections increased from 3% in 1985-94 to 27% in 1995-2001 while abdominoperineal excisions decreased. Postoperative complication rate was not increased in intersphincteric resections (25%) while postoperative mortality did not differ between the operative procedures. The overall 5-year-rate of locoregional recurrence decreased from 18% to 16%. In intersphincteric resections 14.2% of the patients treated with radiochemotherapy developed locoregional recurrence, while this rate was 46.5% (7/18) if adjuvant treatment was not administered (P = 0.0200). The cancer-related 5-year survival rate was not altered by intersphincteric resection.

CONCLUSION

In carcinomas of the lower third of the rectum, the application of abdomino-peranal intersphincteric resection can reduce the need for rectal excision by 20%. Neo-/adjuvant radiochemotherapy is required to reduce locoregional recurrence to an acceptable level.

Meta-analysis of colonic reservoirs versus straight coloanal anastomosis after anterior resection

Background and methods

The comparative benefits and drawbacks of straight coloanal anastomosis (CAA), colonic J-pouch and coloplasty anastomosis after anterior resection are uncertain. Studies published between 1986 and 2005 of colonic J-pouch versus transverse coloplasty or straight CAA were analysed. Endpoints included postoperative complications, and functional and physiological outcomes measured within 6 months, 1 year and 2 years or more after the procedure. A random-effect model was used to aggregate the study endpoints and assess heterogeneity.

Results

Thirty-five studies containing 2240 patients (1066 straight CAA, 1050 J-pouch and 124 coloplasty) were included. There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the three groups. There was a significant reduction in the frequency of defaecation per day by 1·88, 1·35 and 0·74 motions at the three time intervals in the J-pouch group compared with the straight CAA group. Faecal urgency was less prevalent in patients with a J-pouch than those with a straight CAA (odds ratio 0·27 at 6 months or less and 0·21 at 1 year). There was no difference in functional outcome between J-pouch and coloplasty anastomosis.

Conclusions

The colonic J-pouch provided functional benefits over straight anastomosis with no increase in postoperative complications. Coloplasty appeared to have similar benefits but further studies are required for validation.

Estándares de calidad de la cirugía del cáncer de recto

The results of surgery for rectal cancer have classically been measured through indicators such as morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay. In the last few years other parameters have been included that evaluate healthcare quality such as the functional results of the surgical technique employed and quality of life. Total resection of the mesorectum, performed by experienced surgeons, is the surgical technique of choice. Currently, the sphincter can be preserved in 70% of patients. Anastomotic dehiscence after anterior resection of the rectum is the most serious complication and the most important risk factor is the height of the anastomosis. The overall dehiscence rate should be less than 15% and operative mortality should be between 2% and 3%. The colonic reservoir improves functional outcome and consequently it is the procedure of choice to reconstruct transit after low anterior resection. Local recurrence should be less than 10% and 5-year survival should be between 70% and 80%. In general, quality of life is better after anterior resection of the rectum than after abdominoperineal amputation, despite the functional deterioration presented by some patients.

Changes in outcome with sphincter preserving surgery for rectal cancer in Korea, 1991-2000

AIM

To report the clinical and oncological data of patients operated on for rectal cancers 3-5 cm from the AV over a 10 year period, including the Sphincter preservation (SP) rate.

METHODS

We reviewed medical records of 304 patients with rectal cancers 3-5 cm from the AV who underwent surgical resection from January 1991 through December 2000. The 10 years were divided into three periods based on the introduction of new surgical techniques, specifically, ultralow anterior resection (ULAR) with double stapling in March 1994 and ULAR with coloanal anastomosis in April 1997. The rates of SP, complications and patient survival during these periods were compared.

RESULTS

The SP rate increased significantly over the 10 years, from 16.4% in period I (January 1991-February 1994), to 53.0% in period II (March 1994-March 1997), to 86.5% in period III (April 1997-December 2000) (p<0.001). Over time, the age of the patients increased (p=0.004), the length of the distal resection margin became shorter (p=0.005), and the rate of lymph node metastasis increased (p=0.016). The factors significantly influencing SP were the period (p<0.001) and the distance from the AV (p<0.001). Over time, morbidity did not increase, and overall and disease free survival rates did not decrease. In contrast, the overall survival of N2 cases significantly increased over time (p=0.0492).

CONCLUSION

Over 10 years, the SP rate in rectal cancers 3-5 cm from the AV was significantly increased by the introduction of the double stapling and coloanal anastomosis techniques. These surgical methods, however, had no effect on morbidity, disease free survival and overall survival rates.

Survival after surgical treatment of cancer of the rectum

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Rectal carcinoma is one of the most prevalent tumour types. Prognostic factors are of special interest to estimate prognosis of the individual patient.

PATIENTS/METHODS

The data of 1,067 consecutive patients with solitary invasive rectal carcinoma, resected between 1988 and 1999 at the Department of Surgery of the University of Erlangen, were analysed. Cancer-related survival rate was calculated by univariate and multivariate analysis with respect to all relevant proven and probable prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The R classification was found to be the parameter with the greatest influence on survival of patients with rectal carcinoma. Other tumour-related prognostic factors that influenced prognosis significantly were the anatomical extent, described by the TNM classification of the UICC, tumour grade and extramural venous invasion (EVI). In addition, the operating surgeon, a therapy-related factor, and the preoperative serum CEA level were found to influence prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Tumour-related prognostic factors have the greatest influence on clinical decisions with regard to choice of a therapeutic concept. The increasing survival rates after treatment of rectal carcinoma have led to a focus on postoperative quality of life. Postoperative long-term global quality of life is similar to the preoperative level. Oncological outcome is still the most important factor, and tumour recurrence leads to a strong impairment of quality of life.

Functional outcome after intersphincteric resection of the rectum with coloanal anastomosis in low rectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

Anterior rectal resection with partial removal of the internal sphincter is an option for low rectal cancer. The objective of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome after this intersphincteric rectal resection.

METHODS

Anal continence was evaluated by anorectal manometry and a standardized questionnaire (Wexner Score) in 33 patients 28+/-15 weeks and 100+/-45 weeks, respectively, after intersphincteric resection. Nineteen of the 33 patients were reconstructed with a straight anastomosis; 12 received a colonic J-pouch.

RESULTS

Post-operatively, 25.8% of the patients were incontinent to solid stool and 54.8% were incontinent to liquid stool at least once a week. Mean and maximum resting tone (24+/-10 and 40+/-13 mmHg), maximum tolerable volume (77+/-28 ml) and rectal compliance (1.4+/-1.2 ml/mmHg) were reduced in anorectal manometry. Squeeze pressures remained unchanged. Only the maximum tolerable volume correlated significantly with the continence score (r=-0.45, p<0.05). The Wexner score and maximum tolerable volume were significantly better after colonic J-pouch reconstruction than after straight anastomosis (9.9+/-4.5 vs 13.4+/-4.0, p<0.05, 65+/-20 ml vs 100+/-27 ml, p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Intersphincteric resection of the rectum leads to impaired post-operative continence. The functional outcome is improved with a colonic J-pouch.

Early results of intersphincteric resection for patients with very low rectal cancer: an active approach to avoid a permanent colostomy

PURPOSE

Abdominoperineal resection has been the standard surgery for very low rectal cancer located within 5 cm of the anal verge. However, permanent colostomy exerts serious limitations on quality of life. The present study aimed to investigate curability and functional results of intersphincteric resection and additional partial external sphincteric resection for carcinoma of the anorectal junction.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients were prospectively studied from November 1999 to September 2002. All patients displayed adenocarcinoma (T3: n = 26; T2: n = 7; T1: n = 2) located between 0 and 2 cm above the dentate line. Abdominotransanal rectal resection with total mesorectal excision was performed in all patients (total intersphincteric resection: n = 14; subtotal intersphincteric resection: n = 5; additional partial external sphincteric resection: n = 6). All patients underwent diverting colostomy, which was closed at a median of six months postoperatively. Twenty patients received preoperative radiochemotherapy.

RESULTS

All patients had curative intent with microscopic safety margins (mean surgical cut end: 4 mm; mean distal cut end: 10 mm). No postoperative mortality was encountered. Morbidity was identified in 13 patients (perianastomotic abscess: n = 4; anastomotic leakage and fistula: n = 4; postoperative bleeding: n = 2; wound infection: n = 1; anastomotic stenosis: n = 1; anovaginal fistula: n = 1). One of these patients received a permanent colostomy. Five patients developed recurrence (liver: n = 1; lung: n = 2; local and lung: n = 1; abdominal wall: n = 1) during the median observation period (23 months). Two of these patients underwent curative resection of liver or lung metastases. Twenty-one patients have received stoma closure, and although continence was satisfactory in all, 5 displayed occasional minor soiling 12 months after stoma closure. Anal canal manometry demonstrated significant reduction in maximum resting pressure (median: 50 cmH(2)O at 12 months after stoma closure), but acceptable function results were obtained.

CONCLUSION

Curability and anal function were achieved by means of intersphincteric resection without or with additional partial external sphincteric resection. These procedures can be recommended for low rectal cancer patients who are candidates for abdominoperineal resection.

Impact of Preoperative Staging and Chemoradiation Versus Postoperative Chemoradiation on Outcome in Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Decision Analysis

BACKGROUND

Although radical resection and postoperative chemoradiation have been the standard therapy for patients with rectal cancer, preoperative staging by local imaging and chemoradiation are widely used. We used a decision analysis to compare the two strategies for rectal cancer management.

METHODS

We developed a decision model to compare survival outcomes after postoperative chemoradiation versus preoperative staging and chemoradiation in patients aged 70 years with resectable rectal cancer. In the postoperative chemoradiation strategy, patients undergo radical resection and receive postoperative chemoradiation. In the preoperative staging and chemoradiation strategy, patients with locally advanced cancer receive preoperative chemoradiation and radical resection, whereas those with amenable localized tumors undergo local excision. The cohorts of patients were entered into a Markov model incorporating age-adjusted and disease-specific mortality. Outcomes were evaluated by modeling 5-year disease-specific survival for preoperative chemoradiation as less than, equal to, or greater than that of postoperative chemoradiation. Base-case probabilities were derived from published data; the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program database; and U.S. Life Tables. One-way and two-way sensitivity analyses were performed. The outcome measures were life expectancy and quality-adjusted life expectancy.

RESULTS

Life expectancy and quality-adjusted life expectancy were 9.72 and 8.72 years, respectively, in the postoperative chemoradiation strategy. In the preoperative staging and chemoradiation strategy, life expectancy was 9.36, 9.72, and 10.09 years and quality-adjusted life expectancy was 8.71, 9.04, and 9.37 years when 5-year disease-specific survival was less than, equal to, or greater than that of postoperative chemoradiation, respectively. The decision model was sensitive to differences in the long-term toxicity of pre- and postoperative chemoradiation. When the 5-year disease-specific survival for patients after pre- or postoperative chemoradiation was equal, the decision model was sensitive to surgical mortality and to the probability of residual lymph node disease after local excision.

CONCLUSION

If efficacy and toxicity after preoperative chemoradiation are equal to or better than that after postoperative chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, then preoperative staging to select patients appropriate for preoperative chemoradiation is beneficial.

Feasibility of early closure of loop ileostomies: a pilot study

PURPOSE

A loop ileostomy is constructed to protect a distal anastomosis, and closure is usually performed not earlier than after two to three months. Earlier closure might reduce stoma-related morbidity, improve quality of life, and still effectively protect the distal anastomosis. This pilot study was designed to investigate the feasibility of early closure of loop ileostomies, i.e., during the same hospital admission as the initial operation.

METHODS

Twenty-seven consecutive patients with a protective loop ileostomy were included. If patient's recovery was uneventful, water-soluble contrast enema examination was performed, preferably after seven to eight days. If no radiologic signs of leakage were detected, the ileostomy was closed during the same hospital admission.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (8 females; mean age, 60 years) were analyzed. Eighteen patients had early ileostomy closure on average 11 (range, 7-21) days after the initial procedure. In nine patients the procedure was postponed because of leakage of the anastomosis (n = 3), delayed recovery (n = 1), small bowel obstruction (n = 1), gastroparesis (n = 1), logistic reasons (n = 2), or irradical cancer resection followed by radiotherapy (n = 1). There was no mortality and four mild complications occurred after early closure: superficial wound infection (n = 2), intravenous-catheter sepsis (n = 1), small bowel obstruction (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

Closure of a loop ileostomy early after the initial operation was feasible in 18 of 27 patients and was associated with low morbidity and no mortality.

Rectal resection with low anastomosis: functional outcome

OBJECTIVE

Function after anterior, low anterior and intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer was studied.

METHOD

Of 139 patients 122 responded to a standardized questionnaire (Cleveland Clinic Continence Score) 108 +/- 46 weeks postoperatively and 70 underwent anorectal manometry at 26 +/- 15 weeks.

RESULTS

The postoperative continence score was dependent on the procedure (anterior resection 4.1 +/- 4.6, low anterior resection 6.9 +/- 5.6, intersphincteric resection 11.5 +/- 5.2; P < 0.0001). It was poorer after radiochemotherapy (9.0 vs. 5.7; P = 0.030), but after colonic pouch reconstruction there was no significant difference between low anterior resection (5.6 vs. 7.3) and intersphincteric resection (10.0 vs. 12.5). Mean and maximal resting pressures were significantly reduced after intersphincteric resection (24 +/- 9 and 40 +/- 13 mmHg, respectively, P < 0.001) and further reduced by radiochemotherapy. Squeeze pressure was unaffected by the operative procedures and radiochemotherapy. Maximum tolerable volume and rectal compliance were reduced, after both low anterior and intersphincteric resection. Statistical correlation between continence score and maximal resting pressure (P = 0.014), mean resting pressure (P = 0.002), urge volume (P = 0.037), and neorectal compliance (P = 0.0018) reached significance. Satisfaction with the functional outcome was expressed by 71% of patients.

CONCLUSION

After rectal resection the degree of impaired continence depended on the operative procedure and the form of reestablishment of intestinal continuity. Radiochemotherapy affected the outcome adversely. Despite reduced function, overall patient satisfaction was high.

Transvaginal local excision of rectal carcinoma

PURPOSE

To recommend a new approach-transvaginal local excision of early rectal cancers-and report the results of the approach applied by dedicated surgeons at a specialized colorectal unit during a 10-year period.

METHODS

The surgical outcome of 18 patients undergoing transvaginal local resection between January 1991 and August 2001 was reviewed. Patients were identified according to the consultants' personal records and cross-referenced with the operating room logs. Data were collected retrospectively, and follow-up was performed on all patients.

RESULTS

A total of 18 patients underwent 18 procedures during the study period. Follow-up ranged from 2 months to 104 months. There were no treatment-related complications. Two patients suffered from recurrences at a median follow-up time of 35.7 months, but they underwent subsequent surgical treatment: APR (one) and LAR (one). No evidence of disease was found during a median follow-up of 20 months (12 and 28 months). No one died.

CONCLUSIONS

Transvaginal local excision is an alternative and feasible technique with low rates of death and complications for the treatment of rectal cancer in strictly selected cases.

Options for sphincter preservation in surgery for low rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Abdominoperineal excision of the rectum with a permanent end-sigmoid colostomy was the classical operation for cancer of the distal third of the rectum. A number of factors have recently led to a more conservative approach, allowing sphincter preservation when excising tumours that are not invading the anal sphincter.

METHODS

The review is based on the published literature of the treatment of low rectal cancers accessed by searching Medline and other online databases. It includes a description of all the surgical options currently available for low rectal tumours, and a discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of the types of anastomosis and reconstruction.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

It is now technically possible to remove rectal cancer that is extending into the anal canal with preservation of the anal sphincter mechanism and with a satisfactory oncological outcome. Ultra-low colorectal and coloanal anastomosis, together with a colonic pouch or coloplasty, produces acceptable function in many patients. However, there is still controversy about the risk of tumour implantation, the place of downsizing neoadjuvant therapy, and true long-term functional outcome. Despite these concerns, surgeons should strive to perform rectal resection with sphincter preservation for low-lying rectal cancer whenever possible.

Evaluation of preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy on long-term functional results of straight coloanal anastomosis

PURPOSE

Preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer avoids radiation to the reconstructed rectum and may circumvent the detrimental effects on bowel function associated with postoperative radiotherapy. We compared the long-term functional results of patients who received preoperative radiotherapy, postoperative radiotherapy, or no radiotherapy in conjunction with low anterior resection and coloanal anastomosis to assess the impact of pelvic radiation on anorectal function.

METHODS

One hundred nine patients treated by low anterior resection and straight coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer between 1986 and 1997 were assessed with a standardized questionnaire at two to eight years after resection. All radiotherapy was given to a total dose of 4,500 to 5,400 cGy with conventional doses and techniques. Most patients received concurrent 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.

RESULTS

There were 39 patients in the preoperative radiotherapy group, 11 patients in the postoperative radiotherapy group, and 59 patients in the no radiotherapy group. The postoperative radiotherapy group reported a significantly greater number of bowel movements per 24-hour period (P < 0.01) and significantly more episodes of clustered bowel movements (P < 0.02) than either the preoperative radiotherapy group or the no radiotherapy group. No significant difference in anal continence or satisfaction with bowel function was found among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

In this study of straight (nonreservoir) coloanal anastomoses, postoperative pelvic radiotherapy had significant adverse effects on anorectal function, with higher rates of clustering and frequency of defecation than with preoperative radiotherapy. No differences in continence rates were demonstrated, perhaps because of the sample size of the compared groups. We attribute the adverse effects of postoperative radiotherapy to irradiation of the neorectum, which is spared when treatment is given preoperatively. The deleterious effects of adjuvant radiation on long-term anorectal function can be reduced by preoperative treatment.

Elective resection and anastomosis for colorectal cancer: a prospective audit of mortality and morbidity 1976-1998

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this paper is to audit the morbidity and mortality for colorectal cancer after open elective resection and anastomosis by a single colorectal surgeon (MK), with reference to any differences between intraperitoneal (IPA) and extra-peritoneal anastomoses (EPA).

METHODS

The prospective documentation of postoperative complications was compiled by the surgeon, charge nurses and a research assistant (PB). The operations were performed in three hospitals between 1976 and 1998.

RESULTS

Some 1392 consecutive patients were treated electively by 1418 resections with anastomosis. There were 23 postoperative deaths (1.6%). Significant adverse events, which were potentially avoidable, occurred in 10 (43.5%) of the patients who died. The morbidity rate was 41.6%. Clinical anastomotic leaks occurred more frequently in EPA (27/581, 4.7%) than in IPA (2/827, 0.2%; P < 0.0001). Anastomotic leak caused the death of two patients (0.14%).Routine prophylactic anticoagulation did not decrease the incidence of pulmonary embolism. Significant thrombophlebitis at the intravenous cannula site occurred in 54 patients (3.8%), wound infection in 29 (2.1%), and postural peripheral nerve injury in the upper limbs occurred in 11 patients (0.8%). Thirty-eight patients (2.7%) were returned to the operating theatre for 42 unscheduled operations.

CONCLUSION

Mortality associated with elective resection of colorectal cancer with anastomosis is principally related to age, cardio-vascular disease and avoidable adverse events. A wide range of complications may follow this type of surgery, especially after extra peritoneal operations. A classification of anastomotic leaks is suggested to assist in comparisons of this complication which remains a significant concern following extra peritoneal anastomoses.

Randomized clinical trial comparing quality of life after straight and pouch coloanal reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Functional results after rectal resection with straight coloanal anastomosis are poor. While most functional aspects are improved with coloanal J pouch anastomosis, it is still unclear whether this translates into better quality of life. The aim of this trial was to investigate health-related quality of life as a primary endpoint in patients undergoing sphincter-saving rectal resection.

METHODS

Sixty-four patients were randomized to either straight (n = 32) or coloanal J pouch (n = 32) anastomosis. Patients were studied before operation, at the time of stoma reversal and at 3-month intervals for 1 year thereafter. Quality of life was measured using two generic (Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30) and one disease-specific (EORTC QLQ-CR38) instruments. Functional results using a standardized score as well as manometric variables were recorded.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients (19 with a pouch and 20 with a straight anastomosis) completed the trial. There was a marked difference between the two groups with regard to quality of life profile. Patients with a pouch reconstruction had a significantly better quality of life, particularly in the early postoperative period.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing low anterior rectal resection and coloanal J pouch reconstruction may expect not only better functional results but also an improved quality of life in the early months after surgery compared with patients who receive a straight coloanal anastomosis.

Surgical treatment of colon and rectal cancer

There are many indications for surgical intervention in the current treatment of cancer of the colon and rectum. The hallmark of surgical therapy remains en bloc resection of the primary tumor, accompanied by removal of the mesenteric lymph nodes. Surgical resection is also the principal and most successful treatment for local recurrences and isolated metastases. Although the application of minimally invasive techniques is growing in all aspects of surgery and is accepted in the treatment of benign lesions of the colon, laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer cannot be recommended apart from randomized, controlled trials. Similarly, the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer remains to be defined. Various surgical modalities have been developed for the treatment of unresectable colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver. Further studies should help to elucidate the exact role of these therapies in the treatment of this common clinical problem. In summary, surgical treatment plays an important role in multiple aspects of the care of the patient with colorectal cancer.

Local excision and postoperative radiotherapy for distal rectal cancer

PURPOSE

To assess the outcome following local excision and postoperative radiotherapy (RT) for distal rectal carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-three patients received postoperative radiotherapy following local surgery for primary rectal carcinoma at Princess Margaret Hospital from 1983 to 1998. Selection factors for postoperative RT were patient preference, poor operative risks, and "elective" where conservative therapy was regarded as optimal therapy. Median distance of the primary lesion from the anal verge was 4 cm (range, 1--8 cm). There were 24 T1, 36 T2, and 8 T3 lesions. The T category could not be determined in 5. Of 55 tumor specimens in which margins could be adequately assessed, they were positive in 18. RT was delivered using multiple fields by 6- to 25-MV photons. Median tumor dose was 50 Gy (range, 38--60 Gy), and 62 patients received 50 Gy in 2.5-Gy daily fractions. The tumor volume included the primary with 3--5 cm margins. No patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 48 months (range, 10--165 months).

RESULTS

Overall 5-year survival and disease-free survival were 67% and 55%, respectively. Tumor recurrence was observed in 23 patients. There were 14 isolated local relapses; 6 patients developed local and distant disease; and 3 relapsed distantly only. For patients with T1, T2, and T3 lesions, 5-year local relapse-free rates were 61%, 75%, and 78%, respectively, and 5-year survival rates were 76%, 58%, and 33%, respectively. The 5-year local relapse-free rate was lower in the presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) compared to no LVI, 52% vs. 89%, p = 0.03, or where tumor fragmentation occurred during local excision compared to no fragmentation, 51% vs. 76%, p = 0.02. Eleven of 14 patients with local relapse only underwent abdominoperineal resection, 8 achieved local control, and 4 remained cancer free. The ultimate local control, including salvage surgery, was 86% at 5 and 10 years. The 5-year colostomy-free rate was 82%. There were 2 patients who experienced RTOG Grade 3 late complications, and 1 with Grade 4 complication (bowel obstruction requiring surgery).

CONCLUSION

The local relapse rate for patients with T1 disease was high compared to other series of local excision and postoperative RT. Patients with LVI or tumor fragmentation during excision have high local relapse rates and may not be good candidates for conservative surgery and postoperative RT.

[Direct and reservoir colonic-anal anastomoses. Short and long term results]

STUDY AIM

This retrospective study was designed to assess the operative, oncologic and functional results of total proctectomy with coloanal anastomosis (CAA).

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Between 1990 and 1994, 81 patients (44 males/37 females: mean age: 59 years) were operated for a cancer (n = 67) or a benign lesion (n = 14) of the rectum. Sixty-four patients had a straight CAA and 17 patients had a colonic J-pouch.

RESULTS

There was no operative mortality. Two patients were reoperated for colonic necrosis and underwent abdominoperineal resection. An anastomotic leak was observed in 11 patients and its severity was decreased by a diverting stoma. An anastomotic stricture was observed in 10 patients. Of the 67 patients with cancer, 19 (28%) developed metastases and 11 (16%) developed local recurrence. The 5-year survival rate was 69%. Twelve months after the operation, continence was similar with the two types of CAA, but the mean daily stool frequency was lower in patients with a reservoir. With a long follow-up (mean = 9 years), functional results were good with regard to continence and stool frequency, almost similar with the two types of CAA; functional disorders (noctumal stools, fragmentation, urgency) were reported by 25 to 40% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Total proctectomy with coloanal anastomosis yields good oncologic results. With regard to functional results, the superiority of the colonic J-pouch, which is observed in the first postoperative year, was lost beyond this period; long-term results are good for continence and stool frequency, but some disorders persist in a significant proportion of patients.

Functional results of delayed coloanal anastomosis after preoperative radiotherapy for lower third rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess functional outcomes of patients who had a delayed coloanal anastomosis for a lower third rectal cancer after preoperative radiotherapy.

STUDY DESIGN

From January 1988 to December 1997, 35 patients with an adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the rectum received preoperative radiotherapy (45Gy) followed by a rectal resection, combining an abdominal and transanal approach. Colorectal resection was performed about 32 days after the end of the radiotherapy. The distal colon stump was pulled through the anal canal. On postoperative day 5 the colonic stump was resected and a direct coloanal anastomosis performed without colostomia diversion.

RESULTS

There was no mortality. There was no leakage. One patient had a pelvic abscess. One patient had a necrosis of the left colon requiring reoperation. Another delayed coloanal anastomosis could be performed. Median followup was 43 months (range 6 to 113 months). Functional results were evaluated with a new scoring system including 13 items. Function was considered good in 59% and 70% at 1 and 2 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This new procedure is a safe and effective sphincter-preserving operation that avoids a diverting stoma for patients with rectal cancer of the lower third of the rectum. This technique is well adapted for patients receiving preoperative radiotherapy, with low local morbidity and good functional results. Further adaptation could be imagined for a coelioscopic approach.

Surgeon influenced variables in resectional rectal cancer surgery

PURPOSE

Surgeon influenced variables in rectal cancer surgery were assessed.

METHODS

The literature was reviewed to discuss technical and educational issues that may affect the outcome of surgery for rectal cancer. Particular attention was paid to recently debated topics such as adjuvant therapy, colonic J-pouches, total mesorectal excision, and surgeons' training.

RESULTS

In some selected cases, transanal techniques with or without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy have improved the success of local excision. The biology of rectal cancer has begun to be understood. However, until a more complete understanding with an appreciation of therapeutic implications has been arrived at, surgeon influenced variables will continue to be of paramount importance. Multiple studies have shown tremendous surgeon variability in the outcome after rectal cancer surgery. Some of the variables that have been shown to be important include tumor-free distal and lateral margins, a total mesorectal excision, and an appropriate anastomosis. It has been well demonstrated that proctectomy with straight coloanal anastomosis compromises function as compared with preoperative levels or healthy controls. These deficiencies are further exacerbated by adjuvant therapy. Significant functional improvements, particularly in the first 12 to 24 months after surgery, have been achieved with use of colonic J-pouch.

CONCLUSION

There are many ways by which the surgeon can optimize curative resection for rectal cancer. Appropriate distal and tumor-free lateral margins with total mesorectal excision should be the goals for all tumors in the lower two-thirds of the rectum. Reconstruction should be performed, whenever technically possible, by a colonic J-pouch. Surgeons should be cognizant of their own practice patterns, volume, capabilities, and very importantly results. These results should be audited frequently and willingly shared with patients.

Long-term results of low anterior resection with intersphincteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum: analysis of 31 patients

INTRODUCTION

Between 1985 and 1996, 190 patients underwent a low anterior rectal resection with coloanal anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum.

METHODS

This article reports on 31 (17 males) of these patients with a very low localization of the tumor (distal tumor margin 1.3 +/- 0.9 cm above the dentate line). If the function of the sphincter was acceptable and we could exclude tumor infiltration into the sphincter through endosonography, we relocated the resection plane distally into the intersphincteric region to attain an acceptable margin of safety. In all of these cases, it was impossible for us to perform the usual surgical procedure of a mechanical anastomosis by means of a circular stapler. After intersphincteric rectal resection, the anastomosis was handsewn, using interrupted sutures from the perineal approach, 2.5 to 3 cm above the anal verge, implementing Parks' retractor. A protective stoma was performed in all cases. All data were documented prospectively.

RESULTS

COMPLICATIONS

Postoperative mortality was 0 percent. Postoperatively, none of the patients showed an indication for relaparotomy. The leakage rate was 48 percent. Only 16 percent later needed additional surgery for anastomotic strictures or for rectovaginal fistulas. Long-term observations showed that the anastomosis healed well in 27 patients (87.1 percent). Four patients (12.9 percent) decided to have a terminal colostomy performed (anastomotic stricture, 3 patients; anorectal incontinence, 1 patient).

FOLLOW-UP

During the follow-up period of 6.8 +/- 3.7 years, six patients (19.4 percent) developed a tumor progression (9.7 percent local recurrences and 12.9 percent distant spread). The five-year survival rate was 79 percent (Dukes A, 100 percent (n = 18); Dukes B, 67 percent (n = 4); and Dukes C, 44 percent (n = 9)). Continence: One-third of patients developed anorectal incontinence for liquid (29.6 percent) or solid stool (3.7 percent). Average stool frequency was 3.3 times per day. Resting pressure decreased significantly by 29 percent (preoperative, 105 +/- 37 cm H2O and postoperative, 75 +/- 19 cm H2O; P < 0.05), whereas squeeze pressure did not change.

CONCLUSION

In selected patients with tumors close to the dentate line, an intersphincteric resection of the rectum may help to avoid an abdominoperineal excision of the rectum with a terminal stoma, without any curtailment of oncologic standards. A protective stoma for three months is advantageous.

Preoperative Chemoradiation and Coloanal J Pouch Reconstruction for Low Rectal Cancer

Our objective was to determine clinical outcomes of treatment of low rectal adenocarcinoma with neoadjuvant chemoradiation, rectal excision, and coloanal J pouch reconstruction. A retrospective review of 69 patients with stage B2 or higher lesions was performed. Preoperative chemoradiation was followed by low anterior resection and coloanal J pouch anastomosis, with end loop ileostomy. Data were analyzed using the SPSS computer software. There were 46 males and 23 females, with a median age of 63 years. Pathologic staging showed no tumor in the specimen, i.e.: stage 0,14 per cent; stage A, 14 per cent; stage B, 53 per cent; stage C, 18 per cent; and stage D, 1.4 per cent. Postoperative mortality was 2.8 per cent, and the pelvic leak rate was 4.3 per cent. After curative resection, 89 per cent patients are alive and 83 per cent are disease free with a mean follow-up of 50 months. The local recurrence rate is 7.2 per cent. Nodal status was the most important predictor of survival and disease-free survival. Most (96%) have fewer than two bowel movements a day and are satisfied with the functional results. We conclude that preoperative chemoradiation and coloanal J pouch reconstruction can achieve low recurrence rates and prolonged survival for most patients with low rectal cancer with an acceptable quality of life.

Fecal continence following partial resection of the anal canal in distal rectal cancer: long-term results after coloanal anastomoses

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to assess the influence of partial excision of the superior portion of the anal canal (AC) when necessary for tumor margin clearance in distal rectal cancer on fecal continence after coloanal anastomoses.

METHODS

Between 1977 to 1993, 209 patients with middle and lower third rectal cancers underwent complete rectal excision and coloanal anastomoses. For very low tumors, located at or below 5 cm from the anal verge (AV), varying portions of the superior segment of the AC were excised for tumor margin clearance. The magnitude of resections was inversely proportional to the height of the anastomosis from the AV. The patients were categorized into 3 groups according to their level of anastomoses from AV: group 1, patients with anastomoses from 0.5 to less than 2 cm from AV (1 to 2.5 cm of AC resected, i.e., major resection); group 2, anastomoses at 2 to less than 3 cm from AV (less than 1 cm of AC resected, i.e., minor resection); group 3, with anastomoses at 3 to 3.5 cm from AV (AC completely preserved). A standard questionnaire, physical examination, and anal manometry at intervals of 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months were performed prospectively to assess anal continence.

RESULTS

The patients in the 3 categories were matched for age, gender, stage, presence or absence of a colonic J-pouch, preoperative neoadjuvant radiotherapy and surgical technique. Fourteen patients with postoperative radiotherapy were excluded from the clinical assessment. Mean follow-up was 33.5 months. There were 43 patients in group 1, 75 in group 2, and 73 in group 3 for clinical assessment. In the first year, there was progressive improvement in anal continence in all 3 groups. At 2 years, 50% in group 1, 73% in group 2, and 62% in group 3 were fully continent. The proportion of patients fully continent in group 1 remained unchanged as compared to continued improvement for groups 2 and 3 following the first year. At 4 years, 50% in group 1, 80% in group 2, and 68% in group 3 were completely continent. The difference among the 3 groups was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

For distal rectal cancer, where tumor margin clearance necessitates partial resection of the superior portion of the AC, when limited to less than 1 cm, the proportion of patients remaining fully continent is similar to those with complete AC preservation. More substantial excisions of the AC can still result in satisfactory anal continence, such that following the fourth year, one half of the patients can expect to be fully continent.

Rectal excision and colonic pouch-anal anastomosis for rectal cancer: oncologic results at five years

PURPOSE

Preservation of the anal sphincter is now accepted as a primary aim in surgical treatment of rectal cancer. The use of colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis after complete rectal excision is one method that permits retention of continence without compromising oncologic principles. This study aimed to assess carcinologic results of rectal excision followed by colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis, with particular reference to rate of locoregional recurrence.

METHOD

From 1984 to 1990 complete rectal excision and colonic pouch-anal anastomosis were performed in 167 patients for cancer of the middle or low rectum. A total of 154 patients were followed for this study for a minimum of five years, with evaluation of the frequency of locoregional recurrence.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients died during the period of surveillance, giving a five-year survival rate of 68.8 percent. Twenty patients (13 percent) presented with locoregional recurrence at an average of 31 months after surgery. In 11 cases (7 percent) the local recurrence was not associated with metastatic disease, and six of these patients underwent further curative surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm that coloanal anastomosis after complete rectal excision is a valuable option in the surgical treatment of rectal cancer and is accompanied by a frequency of isolated locoregional recurrence of less than 7 percent, of which half underwent surgical resection with curative intent.

Coloanal anastomosis for distal third rectal cancer: prospective study of oncologic results

PURPOSE

Jeopardizing cure and risking high local recurrence have served as arguments against sphincter-saving resection for patients with distal third rectal cancer. This prospective study examines and compares the local recurrence and survival rates in patients with distal third rectal cancer treated by either coloanal anastomosis or abdominoperineal resection.

METHODS

Between 1977 and 1993, 174 patients underwent coloanal anastomoses and 38 patients underwent abdominoperineal resection. All tumors were located 4 to 7 cm from the anal verge. One hundred ninety-three patients (91 percent) underwent rectal excision with a curative intent. Mean follow-up was 66 months after sphincter-saving resection and 65 months after abdominoperineal resection.

RESULTS

Mean anastomotic height from the anal verge was 2.3 cm after sphincter-saving resection. Overall local recurrence rate was 7.9 percent after sphincter-saving resection and 12.9 percent after abdominoperineal resection. The five-year actuarial survival rate was 78 percent after sphincter-saving resection and 74 percent after abdominoperineal resection.

CONCLUSION

Local recurrence and survival are not compromised in patients with distal third rectal cancer when treated by sphincter-saving resection, provided that oncologic principles are not violated. Coloanal anastomosis can be performed with an acceptable morbidity.

Long-term functional results of colonic J pouch versus straight coloanal anastomosis

BACKGROUND

There are very few studies evaluating the long-term functional outcome of coloanal anastomoses. This retrospective study aimed to compare long-term functional results of straight and colonic J pouch anastomoses.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients, 25 with a straight anastomosis and 12 with a J pouch anastomosis, responded to a standardized telephone questionnaire. The mean time since surgery was 10 (range 4-18) years.

RESULTS

The mean daily stool frequency was similar in both groups of patients (1.1 in patients with a reservoir, 1.5 in patients with a straight anastomosis). In both groups, two-thirds of patients had perfect continence or limited gas incontinence. Faecal incontinence was reported by two patients with a straight anastomosis and one patient with a pouch. Nocturnal stools and fragmentation were slightly more frequent in patients with a straight anastomosis. Half of the patients regularly used medication. Thirty-five of the 37 patients reported satisfaction with functional results.

CONCLUSION

Long-term functional results of coloanal anastomoses are satisfactory and, unlike early results, similar for both types of anastomosis. The functional benefit of a reservoir, seen in the first year after operation, is less evident with increasing time.

Intersphincteric resection with excision of internal anal sphincter for conservative treatment of very low rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Standard surgical treatment for low rectal cancer situated below 5 cm from the anal verge or at less than 1 cm from the anal ring is abdominoperineal resection. This is because of the necessity both to achieve a sufficient distal margin and to preserve the whole of the anal sphincter. The aim of this study was to evaluate morbidity, oncologic, and functional results of intersphincteric resection with excision of the internal anal sphincter and low coloanal anastomosis for carcinomas of the anorectal junction.

METHODS

From January 1990 to December 1996, 16 patients were studied prospectively. All patients had an infiltrating adenocarcinoma (5 T2 and 11 T3), located between 2.5 and 4.5 (mean, 3.6) cm from the anal verge. Rectal resection with a minimum distal margin of 2 (mean, 2.4) cm was performed in all cases; six patients underwent partial resection of the internal sphincter, and ten patients had a subtotal resection. A colonic J-pouch was associated with coloanal anastomoses in eight cases. Twelve patients had preoperative radiotherapy, 3 with concomitant chemotherapy; 5 patients had postoperative chemotherapy.

RESULTS

There was no postoperative mortality. Morbidity occurred in four patients, of whom two underwent permanent colostomy after pelvic hemorrhage or anovaginal fistula. After a median follow-up of 44 (range, 11-92) months, no local recurrence was observed, and two patients died of distal metastases. The five-year actuarial survival rate was 75 percent. Continence was normal in one-half of patients and was altered in the other patients who suffered from occasional minor leaks. The median resting pressure was lower after subtotal than after partial resection of the internal sphincter (40 vs. 70 cm H2O; P = 0.02), but functional results were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

These preliminary results suggest that intersphincteric resection can be an alternative to abdominoperineal resection for selected rectal tumors situated at the anorectal junction, without compromising chance of cure. Functional results and continence were not altered by subtotal resection of the internal anal sphincter.

Functional results of colonic J-pouch anastomosis for rectal cancer

The purpose of this study was to clarify the functional outcomes of colonic J-pouch anastomosis (J-LAR) for lower rectal cancer in comparison with those of traditional straight anastomosis (S-LAR). A questionnaire regarding anorectal function was conducted 1 year after operation on patients who underwent J-LAR (n = 15) and S-LAR (n = 30). The clinical functions were assessed by an incontinence scoring system. The physiologic function was assessed by anorectal manometry and the balloon expulsion test. No patients demonstrated a diverting stoma. The bowel frequency (range) 1 year after operation was 4.8 (3-6) in the S-LAR group and significantly decreased to 1.8 (1-3) in the J-LAR group (P < 0.05). Complete evacuation was 50.2% (40%-60%) in the S-LAR group and significantly increased to 80.6% (60%-90%) in the J-LAR group (P < 0.05). Neorectal compliance was 2.2 (1.4-2.9) ml/mmHg in the S-LAR group and significantly increased to 3.1 (1.3-3.5) ml/mmHg in the J-LAR group (P < 0.01). No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding the maximum resting or maximum voluntary squeezing pressure. In conclusion, our findings suggested colonic pouch anastomosis performed after a low anterior resection to support the compliance of the (neo)rectum to be an important factor for retaining a satisfactory bowel frequency.