Pouchogram: predictor of clinical outcome following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

Pouchogram Prior to Ileostomy Reversal after Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Pediatric Patients: Is it Useful in the Setting of Routine EUA?

PURPOSE

To determine if there is a role for routine pouchogram before ileostomy reversal after IPAA in pediatric patients.

METHODS

The medical records of pediatric patients who underwent pouchogram between 2007 and 2017 prior to ileostomy reversal after IPAA at two affiliated hospitals were reviewed for concordance between exam under anesthesia (EUA) and pouchogram findings, management of abnormal pouchogram findings, and short and long-term outcomes after ileostomy reversal. Clinical notes were used to find patient-reported symptoms at the time of pouchogram.

RESULTS

Sixty patients (57% female) underwent pouchogram before planned ileostomy reversal. The median time from IPAA formation to pouchogram was 60.5 days (IQR: 46-77) and median follow-up was 4 years (IQR: 1-6). Fifty-seven patients (95%) were asymptomatic prior to reversal. Of the 40 asymptomatic patients with a normal EUA, pouchogram detected one stricture (3%), but reversal proceeded as planned. In the 16 patients with strictures on EUA, pouchogram only detected six (40%). One of 50 (2%) asymptomatic patients with normal pouchogram had anastomotic dehiscence found on EUA. Despite normal pouchogram and EUA, four asymptomatic patients required subsequent diversion for pouch-related complications between 13 and 60 months after ileostomy reversal. Three patients had pelvic pain prior to pouchogram; associated symptoms included perineal pain (n = 1) hematochezia (n = 1), and tenesmus (n = 1). EUA and pouchogram were concordant in two patients (n = 1 anastomotic complication, n = 1 pouch septum) and ileostomy reversal was delayed. In the remaining symptomatic patient, pouchogram detected an anastomotic leak where EUA detected only a stricture, and this prompted a delay in reversal. Long term, none of these patients required diversion or excision of their pouch.

CONCLUSION

Routine pouchogram in asymptomatic pediatric patients does not change management and can be omitted, thereby sparing patients discomfort and unnecessary radiation exposure. Pouchogram may have diagnostic value in symptomatic patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

TYPE OF STUDY

Study of Diagnostic Test.

Abnormal Pouchogram Predicts Pouch Failure Even in Asymptomatic Patients

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic complications after restorative total proctocolectomy with IPAA for ulcerative colitis alter functional outcomes and quality of life and may lead to pouch failure. Routine contrast enema of the pouch assesses anastomotic integrity before ileostomy reversal, but its clinical use is challenged.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this research was to assess the relationship among preoperative clinical characteristics, abnormal pouchography, and long-term pouch complications.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective chart review.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at a tertiary care center between 2000 and 2010.

PATIENTS

Ulcerative colitis patients with IPAA undergoing pouchography before ileostomy closure were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient demographics, incidence of pouch-related complications, and findings on pouchogram were recorded. Primary outcome was pouch failure, defined as excision or permanent diversion of the ileoanal pouch. Independent predictors of pouch failure were determined by multivariate regression.

RESULTS

A total of 262 patients with ulcerative colitis were included. Contrast extravasation was seen in 27 patients (10.3%): 14 (51.9%) were clinically asymptomatic at the time of pouchogram. Six (22.2%) of 27 patients with extravasation developed pouch failure despite normalization of the pouchogram before ileostomy closure. Forty patients (15.3%) were found to have pouch-anal anastomotic stenosis; only 1 developed pouch failure. Pre-IPAA serum albumin and hemoglobin levels were inversely associated with contrast extravasation (serum albumin: OR = 0.42; hemoglobin: OR = 0.77; p < 0.05). Contrast extravasation was associated with delayed takedown operation (average = 67 d), increased risk (OR = 5.25; p < 0.01), and shorter time (median = 32.0 vs 72.5 mo; HR = 5.88; p < 0.05) to pouch failure, as well as increased risk of pouch-related complications (p < 0.05).

LIMITATIONS

The study was limited by its retrospective nature and small number of patients who developed pouch failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Pouchography before ileostomy takedown is useful in identifying patients with ulcerative colitis at risk for postoperative complications. Radiologic resolution of IPAA-related leak does not reliably predict healing; caution is warranted in this subgroup. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A818.

Water-Soluble Enema Prior to Ileostomy Closure in Patients Undergoing Low Anterior Resection: Is It Necessary?

BACKGROUND

Diverting ileostomy is recommended in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and low anterior resection for low-rectal cancer. Prior to ileostomy reversal, water-soluble enema is performed to assess the low colorectal anastomosis. The aim of this study was to assess whether performance of routine water-soluble enema prior to ileostomy takedown is necessary.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All mid-low rectal cancer patients who underwent low anterior resection with temporary diverting ileostomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, between 2006 and 2013, were identified, retrospectively. The colorectal anastomosis prior to ileostomy takedown was evaluated by digital rectal exam, rigid proctoscopy, and water-soluble enema. The rectal exam and proctoscopy findings were compared to those of the water-soluble enema. The efficacy of routine water-soluble enema was assessed.

RESULTS

Three hundred and twelve (184 male) patients (mean age 62.2 ± 17 years) met the inclusion criteria. Ten patients (3 %) experienced a contained anastomotic leak in the early postoperative period, of whom six had a positive intraoperative air leak test at the index operation. At follow-up, 12 patients (4 %) presented with anastomotic stricture, which was diagnosed by rectal exam and proctoscopy. In 11 of them, water-soluble enema showed anastomotic stricture. In terms of anastomotic defects, sinus was documented in two patients (0.6 %), yet digital rectal exam and proctoscopy were normal. No late septic complications related to the colorectal anastomosis after ileostomy closure were reported. The sensitivity of rectal exam, and proctoscopy for the diagnosis of anastomotic stricture was 100 %, while its negative predictive value for the diagnosis of anastomotic defect was 99 %.

CONCLUSION

Routine water-soluble enema for the evaluation of colorectal anastomosis before ileostomy takedown does not provide additional information that changes patient management. The efficacy of this test in patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and low anterior resection should be reassessed.

Role of ileostomy in restorative proctocolectomy

Restorative proctocolectomy (RP) is the treatment of choice in patients affected with refractory ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis. Surgery in elective settings is often performed in 2 stages, fashioning an ileostomy which is closed 2-3-mo later. It is still debated whether omitting ileostomy could offer advantages in the management of patients undergoing RP.

Intraoperative, postoperative and reoperative problems with ileoanal pouches

BACKGROUND

Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has been developed and refined since its introduction in the late 1970s. Nonetheless, it is a procedure associated with significant morbidity. The aim of this review was to provide a structured approach to the challenges that surgeons and physicians encounter in the management of intraoperative, postoperative and reoperative problems associated with ileoanal pouches.

METHODS

The review was based on relevant studies identified from an electronic search of MEDLINE, Embase and PubMed databases from 1975 to April 2011. There were no language or publication year restrictions. Original references in published articles were reviewed.

RESULTS

Although the majority of patients experience long-term success with an ileoanal pouch, significant morbidity surrounds IPAA. Surgical intervention is often critical to achieve optimal control of the situation.

CONCLUSION

A structured management plan will minimize the adverse consequences of the problems associated with pouches.

Anastomotic sinuses after ileoanal pouch construction: incidence, management, and outcome

PURPOSE

This study was designed to analyze the incidence, management, and outcome of pouch sinuses after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis at one institution.

METHODS

We identified 282 ileal pouch-anal anastomosis patients between 1992 and 2002 who had a pouchogram before planned ileostomy closure. The management and outcome of patients with pouchograms revealing pouch sinuses were reviewed.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (7.8 percent) had a pouch sinus at pouchogram. Nineteen patients were observed and underwent repeat pouchogram. Of these, ten had sinus resolution (mean, 3.6 months) and underwent successful ileostomy closure. Eight patients underwent examination under anesthesia +/- sinus debridement. Six of these patients had subsequent pouchograms with five showing sinus resolution. The patient without resolution was not reversed. Of the eight patients who underwent examination under anesthesia +/- debridement, seven underwent ileostomy closure (mean, 4.9 months), with healing in six and pelvic sepsis in one. Four patients underwent successful ileostomy takedown despite persistent sinus. Overall, 21 of the 22 pouch sinus patients underwent ileostomy closure and only 1 had postoperative pelvic sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

Pouch sinuses after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with ileostomy are uncommon. Most heal within six months. The majority of patients with sinuses eventually undergo successful ileostomy closure. Pelvic septic complications are rare but can occur despite sinus healing on pouchogram.

Utility of Contrast Enema for Detecting Anastomotic Strictures After Total Proctocolectomy and Ileal Pouch–Anal Anastomosis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to determine the utility of contrast enemas for detecting clinically relevant anastomotic strictures after total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and to facilitate management by defining a critical anastomotic caliber at or below which obstruction is likely to develop after ileostomy closure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our radiology database revealed 42 patients with contrast enemas after total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis who fulfilled our exclusion criteria. The initial postoperative contrast enemas were reviewed blindly to determine the diameter of the ileoanal anastomosis. The diagnosis of a stricture was made only if the patient had signs of intestinal obstruction after ileostomy closure with confirmation on follow-up contrast enema or sigmoidoscopy and clinical improvement after anastomotic dilatation. The data were then correlated to determine if there was a critical anastomotic caliber at or below which such strictures were likely to develop. Using this threshold value, the sensitivity and specificity of routine contrast enemas for detecting clinically relevant anastomotic strictures were then determined.

RESULTS

Six (14%) of the 42 patients who underwent total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis had strictures at the ileoanal anastomosis on contrast enemas. The mean diameter of the anastomosis was 5.8 mm in the six patients with anastomotic strictures versus 15 mm in the 36 patients without strictures (p = 0.0002). If an anastomotic diameter of 8 mm is defined as the critical caliber at or below which clinically relevant strictures are present, the sensitivity of contrast enemas for detecting strictures at the ileoanal anastomosis was 100% (six of six patients) and the specificity was 92% (33 of 36 patients).

CONCLUSION

Routine contrast enema after total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is a sensitive test for detecting clinically relevant strictures at the ileoanal anastomosis when an anastomotic diameter of 8 mm or less is used as the threshold value for diagnosing these strictures. Such patients may need dilatation procedures to decrease the risk of anastomotic obstruction after ileostomy closure.

Is routine pouchogram prior to ileostomy closure in colonic J-pouch really necessary?

INTRODUCTION

Colonic J-pouch with coloanal anastomosis has gained popularity in the surgical treatment of middle and lower rectal pathologies. If a diverting ileostomy is performed, a pouchogram is frequently performed prior to ileostomy closure. The aim of this study was to assess the routine use of pouchogram prior to ileostomy closure in patients with colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis.

METHODS

All patients who underwent a colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis between 1990 and 2000 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with temporary loop ileostomy who had pouchogram prior to ileostomy closure were included. Pouchogram results were compared to the patient's post ileostomy closure clinical outcome. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of pouchogram were assessed.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients had a pouchogram prior to ileostomy closure. Radiological abnormalities were evident in 6 patients, including 4 strictures, 1 pouch-vaginal fistula and 1 leak. Of these findings, 4 were false positives (3 strictures and 1 leak) and two were true positives (1 stricture and 1 pouch-vaginal fistula). The actual rate of pouch complications was 9.5% (8 complications) including 3 anastomotic leaks, all with normal pouchogram, 3 strictures requiring dilatation under anaesthesia, only one detected by pouchogram, and 2 pouch-vaginal fistulas, only one diagnosed by pouchogram. The sensitivity and specificity of pouchogram, respectively, was 0 and 98% for anastomotic leak, 33 and 96% for stricture, and 50 and 100% for pouch-vaginal fistula. Overall, pouchogram changed the management in only 1 of 84 patients.

CONCLUSION

Pouchogram has a low sensitivity in predicting complications following ileostomy closure in patients after colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis and rarely changes the management of these patients. The use of pouchogram prior to ileostomy closure may be unnecessary and should be reserved in cases of clinical suspicion of complications.

Total colectomy and J-pouch ileorectal anastomosis for obstructed tumours of the rectosigmoid junction

BACKGROUND

Subtotal colectomy with ileosigmoid or ileorectal anastomosis is one of the standard procedures for obstructed tumours of the left colon. The lower the level of the anastomosis, the greater the number of bowel motions per day. The aim of the present study was to assess whether an ileal pouch-rectal anastomosis is associated with fewer bowel motions per day.

METHODS

In four patients with obstructed carcinoma of the rectosigmoid junction and upper rectum, a total colectomy with removal of the upper rectum for adequate tumour clearance was used, followed by construction of a 10 cm ileal J-pouch that was subsequently anastomosed to the distal rectal stump.

RESULTS

Postoperative recovery was uneventful in all patients. At 3 months postoperatively, anorectal manometry showed anal resting and squeeze pressures at lower normal limits and a neorectal capacity ranging from 160 to 310 mL. One year postoperatively, all patients experienced one to three normal bowel motions daily and no episodes of incontinence.

CONCLUSIONS

Total colectomy with ileal J-pouch-rectal anastomosis is a reasonable operative alternative in cases with obstructed tumours of the rectosigmoid junction, which necessitate removal of the upper rectum.

Horizontal inclination of the longitudinal axis of the colonic J-pouch: defining causes of evacuation difficulty

PURPOSE

Functional outcome after low anterior resection for rectal cancer is improved by the construction of a colonic J-pouch. One disadvantage of this type of reconstruction is evacuation difficulty, which has been associated with large pouches. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the causes of evacuation difficulty in large pouches using pouchography.

METHODS

The angle between the longitudinal axis of the pouch and the horizontal line (pouch-horizontal angle) on lateral pouchography was determined in 26 patients with 10-cm J-pouch reconstructions (10-J group) and 27 patients with 5-cm J-pouch reconstructions (5-J group). Measurement were made at three months, one year, and two years after surgery. Clinical function was evaluated using a questionnaire one year postoperatively.

RESULTS

The pouch-horizontal angle in the 10-J group was significantly smaller than that in the 5-J group at all three time points. In both groups the pouch-horizontal angle at one year was significantly smaller than that at three months. There were no significant differences between the pouch-horizontal angles at one and two years. An evacuation difficulty was significantly more common in the 10-J group than the 5-J group.

CONCLUSIONS

The evacuation difficulty observed in patients with large colonic J-pouch reconstructions may be attributed to the development of a horizontal inclination within one year of surgery.

Enlargement of colonic pouch after proctectomy and coloanal anastomosis: potential cause for evacuation difficulty

PURPOSE

Although the functional outcome after low anterior resection for rectal cancer using colonic J-pouch reconstruction is superior to that using conventional straight reconstruction, the one drawback of colonic J-pouch reconstruction is difficulty with evacuation. Recently it has been suggested that construction of a larger colonic J-pouch causes the evacuation difficulty. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the cause of evacuation difficulty with colonic J-pouch reconstruction.

METHODS

We compared pouchography of 26 patients with 10-cm colonic J-pouch reconstructions (10-J group) and 27 patients with 5-cm colonic J-pouch reconstructions (5-J group) at three months, one year, and two years after surgery. Functional assessments were performed one year postoperatively. Clinical function was evaluated using a questionnaire. Evacuation function was evaluated by the balloon expulsion and saline evacuation tests.

RESULTS

The greatest width of the pouch in the 10-J group in the anteroposterior view was significantly greater than that in the 5-J group at all three measurement times (3 months, 4.9 vs. 4 cm; P = 0.0011; 1 year, 9 vs. 5.6 cm; P < 0.0001; 2 years, 9.2 vs. 5.8 cm; P < 0.0001). The value in the 10-J group at one year after surgery was 1.9 times that at three postoperative months; in the 5-J group this ratio was 1.4. There was a significant difference between these ratios (P < 0.0001). No significant difference existed between the values at two years and one year after surgery in either the 10-J or the 5-J group. An evacuation difficulty was significantly more common in the 10-J group than the 5-J group. Evacuation function in the 10-J group was significantly inferior to that in the 5-J group.

CONCLUSIONS

The evacuation difficulty observed in patients with larger colonic J-pouch reconstructions is associated with excessive distention of the pouch occurring within one year of surgery.

Treatment of colorectal and ileoanal anastomotic sinuses

PURPOSE

This study is designed to describe a technique and report results for treating low anastomotic sinuses.

METHODS

Restorative proctocolectomy and complicated low anterior resections were protected with diverting loop ileostomy. Contrast enemas identified anastomotic problems before ileostomy closure. Pouch-anal or colorectal anastomotic sinuses that failed to resolve with observation were treated before intestinal continuity was restored. With the patient receiving regional or general anesthesia, a rigid proctoscope or anoscope was used to identify the sinus opening. The common wall between the sinus and the bowel lumen was divided under direct vision with laparoscopic cautery scissors, and the sinus cavity was debrided with a suction cautery wand placed through the scope.

RESULTS

Six patients with anastomotic sinuses have received outpatient treatment in the described manner during the past two years. Four patients had restorative proctocolectomies for ulcerative colitis, and two had low anastomosis for rectal cancer. Three patients presented with pelvic sepsis before the contrast study; the remainder were asymptomatic. Division of anastomotic sinus was performed one to eight months after diagnosis of the sinus. Following division, anastomotic cavities resolved in five patients by 1 month and in one patient by 12 months. In these six patients, there was one dilatable anastomotic stricture but no other anastomotic complications at follow-up 5 to 16 (mean, 9.2) months after sinus division.

CONCLUSION

When used in conjunction with fecal diversion, sinus unroofing by division of the common wall between the sinus and bowel lumen treats low pelvic sinuses.

Stenosis of the pouch anal anastomosis following restorative proctocolectomy

PURPOSE

To compare the incidence of stenosis after hand-sewn and stapled ileoanal anastomosis. Stenosis of the ileoanal anastomosis occurs in 5-16% of patients undergoing a restorative proctocolectomy but the incidence using a stapled technique is unknown.

METHODS

Between 1976 and 1990, 266 patients underwent restorative proctocolectomy or proctectomy at one hospital. In two hundred and eighteen the anastomosis was hand sewn and stapled in 48 (single 33; double 15).

RESULTS

Stenosis occurred in 31 (14.2%) of the hand-sewn and in 19 (39.6%) of the stapled anastomoses. This difference was highly significant (P < 0.001). Stenosis was not related to the size of the staple head used or to the stapling technique. There was no relationship between the development of stenosis and pelvic sepsis. Twenty six (hand-sewn 16, stapled 10) of the 48 patients with stenosis needed dilatation under general anaesthetic.

CONCLUSION

Stapled anastomoses may result in a high incidence of anastomotic stenosis.

Complications of the ileal pouch: is the pouchogram a useful predictor?

A series of ileal pouchograms from 25 consecutive patients has been analysed retrospectively. Ileal pouchography may demonstrate abnormalities which delay closure of the covering ileostomy. The aim was to determine whether disruption of the ileoanal anastomosis and/or leak at pouchography correlated with pelvic sepsis after ileostomy closure. Disruption of the stapled ileoanal anastomosis is a sensitive (88%) but not specific predictor (57%) for subsequent pelvic sepsis. The predictive value of a negative test is high (89%). Leak of contrast from the anastomosis is specific (81%) but not sensitive (56%) for pelvic sepsis. No significant relationship was demonstrated between width of the presacral space and the presence of pelvic sepsis. No significant relationship was demonstrated between diameter of the ileoanal anastomosis and symptoms of stricture. The presence of anastomotic disruption or leak at pouchography prior to ileostomy closure are useful predictors of potential pelvic sepsis.

Stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with resection of the anal transition zone

We assessed the outcome of stapled ileal J-pouch-anal anastomosis with intersphincteric resection of the anal transition zone in 83 consecutive patients with ulcerative colitis (n = 71) or familial adenomatous polyposis (n = 12). There was no postoperative mortality. Two patients (2.4%) required permanent ileostomy for manifestation of unsuspected Crohn's disease. Major postoperative complications consisted of pelvic sepsis, anastomotic leakage, and pancreatitis with 3.6% each. Both, frequency of bowel movements and degree of continence improved with time. Two years after takedown of the diverting ileostomy 45 patients with ulcerative colitis and 12 with familial adenomatous polyposis were assessed with a frequency of bowel movements of 5.6 +/- 2 and 3.2 +/- 1 per 24 h, respectively (P < 0.05). At this time none of them had major daytime or nighttime incontinence. Minor incontinence was reported by 9% and 14% of the patients with ulcerative colitis during day-time and night-time, respectively. The patients with familial adenomatous polyposis demonstrated better results, without day-time seepage and intermittent nocturnal seepage in only 9%. It is concluded that direct ileal J-pouch-anal anastomosis is a safe procedure with excellent functional results for patients with ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis.

Water-soluble contrast pouchography--technique and findings in 85 patients

A simple and safe technique for examining the ileal pouch in the post-operative period is described, and the findings in 85 patients reviewed. Extravasation from the ileo-anal anastomosis was seen in 10/85 (11%). In 14/85 (16%) the lateral view of the filled pouch showed a presacral space > 4 cm, which in 10 (71%) was due to a significant abnormality: six having an anastomotic leak with presacral abscess, two a large presacral haematoma, and two an abscess without anastomotic leak. Pouchography is recommended as a routine examination prior to closure of the covering ileostomy.

Current surgical therapy for mucosal ulcerative colitis

PURPOSE

There are numerous surgical options for the treatment of mucosal ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

This article reviews the currently available options for the treatment of mucosal ulcerative colitis. Separate discussions will explore both the options in the emergency and elective settings.

RESULTS

Patients with mucosal ulcerative colitis may undergo surgery either as an emergency or in the elective setting. Emergency surgery is usually performed for one of the life-threatening complications of ulcerative colitis: fulminant colitis, toxic megacolon, or massive hemorrhage. The most commonly performed procedure under these conditions is a subtotal colectomy with end ileostomy. The rectal stump may be handled in a variety of ways. This procedure avoids proctectomy or anastomosis. Thus, patients will still have all necessary anatomic structures to allow for any of the definitive elective procedures. Elective surgery is performed for intractable disease, complications of medical therapy, dysplasia, or, occasionally, extraintestinal manifestations. In the elective setting, a definitive operation can be done to remove most or all of the disease-bearing colorectum and leave the patient with a means to control fecal elimination. Total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis leaves the patient with diseased bowel but obviates the need for pelvic dissection. Although total proctocolectomy removes all potentially diseased mucosa, these patients have a permanent ileostomy. The stoma can either be a standard Brooke's ileostomy or a continent Kock pouch. The most common definitive procedure currently performed is the near-total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. This option can be completed either with a rectal mucosectomy and hand-sewn anastomosis or with a double-stapled anastomosis, preserving the anal transition zone. This procedure is successful in eradicating almost all diseased mucosa while allowing the patient per anal defecation. Bowel movement frequency, degree of anal continence, and return to social and professional commitments have met with a great deal of satisfaction in most patients. A newer alternative to this procedure employs laparoscopy to facilitate a smaller incision. A one-stage procedure which omits the protective ileostomy and thus saves the patient one operation has also been used with some success in selected cases.

CONCLUSION

There are several surgical options for the treatment of mucosal ulcerative colitis. Each one has a role and should be discussed with the patient.

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: is preoperative anal manometry predictive of postoperative functional outcome?

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the value of preoperative anal manometry in predicting post-operative continence.

METHODS

Anal manometry was performed in 73 consecutive patients before ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery (m1), before loop ileostomy closure (m2), and at a follow-up of one (m3) and two (m4) years. Mean and maximum resting and squeezing pressures were documented at each occasion. One year after surgery, pressures were correlated (r) with an incontinence score.

RESULTS

A significant (P < 0.05) decrease in mean resting pressures was observed after IPAA (m1 = 66 mmHg; m2 = 42.8 mmHg), followed by a significant (P < 0.05) improvement of mean resting pressure after loop ileostomy closure (m3 = 53.8 mmHg; m4 = 54.7 mmHg). Mean squeezing pressures did not change (P > 0.05) at any time during the study (m1 = 114 mmHg; m2 = 102.9 mmHg; m3 = 103.4 mmHg; m4 = 95.8 mmHg). There was no correlation between preoperative mean resting pressure and postoperative (mI) incontinence score.

CONCLUSION

Anal manometry showed a characteristic trend in internal anal sphincter injury after IPAA followed by recovery after ileostomy closure. However, it failed to prove helpful in the prediction of clinical outcome. Thus, although this study supports the continued use of manometry in a research setting, it challenges the value of routine manometry in a clinical context.