Palliative operations for colorectal cancer

Comparison of blowhole colostomy and loop ostomy for palliation of acute malignant colonic obstruction

Purpose

Surgery to create a stoma for decompression might be required for unresectable stage IV cancer patients with complete colonic obstruction. The aim of this study was to compare the results of blowhole colostomy with those of loop ostomy.

Methods

Palliative ileostomy or colostomy procedures performed at a single center between January 2011 and October 2020, were analyzed retrospectively. Fifty-nine patients were identified during this period. The demographic characteristics and outcomes between the blowhole colostomy group (n=24) and the loop ostomy group (n=35) were compared.

Results

The median operative time tended to be shorter in the blowhole colostomy group (52.5 minutes; interquartile range [IQR], 43-65) than in the loop ostomy group (60 minutes; IQR, 40-107), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.162). The median length of hospital stay was significantly shorter with blowhole colostomy (blowhole, 13 days [IQR, 9-23]; loop, 21 days [IQR, 14-37]; P=0.013). Mean cecum diameter was significantly larger in the blowhole group than in the loop group (8.83±1.91 cm vs. 6.78±2.36 cm, P=0.001), and the emergency operation rate was higher in the blowhole group than in the loop group (22 of 24 [91.7%] vs. 23 of 35 [65.7%], P=0.021).

Conclusion

In surgical emergencies, diverting a blowhole colostomy can be safe and effective for palliative management of colonic obstruction in patients with end-stage cancer and might reduce the operative time in emergent situations.

Impact of postoperative complications after primary tumor resection on survival in patients with incurable stage IV colorectal cancer: A multicenter retrospective cohort study

AIMS

Primary tumor resection for patients with incurable stage IV colorectal cancer can prevent tumor-related complications but may cause postoperative complications. Postoperative complications delay the administration of chemotherapy and can lead to the spread of malignancy. However, the impact of postoperative complications after primary tumor resection on survival in patients with incurable stage IV colorectal cancer remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate how postoperative complications after primary tumor resection affect survival in this patient group.

METHODS

We reviewed data on 966 patients with stage IV colorectal cancer who underwent palliative primary tumor resection between January 2006 and December 2007. We examined the association between major complications (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 grade 3 or more) and overall survival using Cox proportional hazard model and explored risk factors associated with major complications using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients (9.6%) had major complications. The 2-year overall survival rate was 32.7% in the group with major complications and 50.3% in the group with no major complications. Patients with major complications had a significantly poorer prognosis than those without major complications (hazard ratio: 1.62; 95% confidence interval: 1.21-2.18; P < .01). Male, rectal tumor, and open surgery were identified to be risk factors for major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative complications after primary tumor resection was associated with decreased long-term survival in patients with incurable stage IV colorectal cancer.

Trends in Primary Surgical Resection and Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, 2000-2016

BACKGROUND

When, whether, and in whom primary tumor resection (PTR) for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) is indicated remains unknown. With advances in multiagent systemic chemotherapy, PTR may be undertaken less frequently. The aim of this study was to obtain estimates of changes in the utilization of PTR and chemotherapy for metastatic CRC.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with metastatic CRC between 2000 and 2016 were identified from Surveillance Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry. Multivariable logistic regression defined odds of undergoing PTR. The analysis was also stratified by primary site (colon vs. rectum), age (younger than 50 vs. 50 y and older), and whether patients also underwent resection of metastatic sites (yes vs. no). The secondary endpoint of interest was the receipt of any chemotherapy, also assessed by multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 99,835 patients with metastatic CRC, 55,527 (55.7%) underwent PTR. The odds of undergoing PTR decreased with a later year of diagnosis, with patients diagnosed in 2016 being 61.1% less likely to undergo surgery than those diagnosed in 2000 (adjusted odds ratio=0.39, 95% confidence interval: 0.36-0.42, P<0.0001; absolute percentage: 62.3% to 43.8%). Similar trends by year for PTR were observed among each of the subgroups, although patients with colon primary, young adults (age younger than 50 y), and patients also undergoing metastasectomy were more likely to undergo PTR (P<0.001 for all). In contrast, the odds of receiving chemotherapy increased dramatically with a later year of diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio=2.21, 95% confidence interval: 2.04-2.40, P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

From 2000 to 2016, there was a sharp decline in the rate of PTR for patients with metastatic CRC, while the use of chemotherapy increased over the same period. Prospective studies are needed to define the optimal local treatment for patients with metastatic CRC.

Simultaneous Resection for Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastasis: the New Standard of Care?

BACKGROUND

Optimal surgical management for patients with synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastasis is controversial. We provide an analysis of surgical utilization and outcomes for patients presenting with synchronous colon and rectal cancer liver metastasis between simultaneous and staged approaches.

METHODS

SPARCS database was used to follow patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer with liver metastases from 2005 to 2014. Using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes, we identified patients undergoing staged and simultaneous resection. Our primary endpoint was major events at 30-day follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 1430 underwent surgery for synchronous colorectal primary and liver metastases between 2005 and 2014. There was no difference in adjusted rates of major events or anastomotic leak. Patients undergoing simultaneous resection were significantly less likely to experience prolonged length of stay (OR = 0.28; 95% CI = 0.21-0.37) or high hospital charges (OR = 0.24; 95% CI = 0.17-0.32) compared to staged resection even among patients undergoing total hepatic lobectomy and complex colorectal resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous resection was found to be equally as safe as staged resection even when evaluating patients undergoing more complex operations, and led to lower health care utilization. Under appropriate clinical circumstances, simultaneous resection offers benefits to patients and the health care system and should be the recommended surgical approach.

A scoring model for predicting survival following primary tumour resection in stage IV colorectal cancer patients with unresectable metastasis

BACKGROUND

Stage IV colorectal cancer patients with unresectable metastasis who undergo elective primary tumour resection experience heterogeneous post-operative survival. We aimed to develop a scoring model for predicting post-operative survival using pre-operative variables to identify patients who are least likely to experience extended survival following the procedure.

METHODS

Survival data were collected from stage IV colorectal cancer patients who had undergone elective primary tumour resection between January 1999 and December 2007. Coefficients of significant covariates from the multivariate Cox regression model were used to compute individual survival scores to classify patients into three prognostic groups. A survival function was derived for each group via Kaplan-Meier estimation. Internal validation was performed.

RESULTS

Advanced age (hazard ratio, HR 1.43 (1.16-1.78)); poorly differentiated tumour (HR 2.72 (1.49-5.04)); metastasis to liver (HR 1.76 (1.33-2.33)), lung (HR 1.37 (1.10-1.71)) and bone (HR 2.08 ((1.16-3.71)); carcinomatosis (HR 1.68 (1.30-2.16)); hypoalbuminaemia (HR 1.30 (1.04-1.61) and elevated carcinoembryonic antigen levels (HR 1.89 (1.49-2.39)) significantly shorten post-operative survival. The scoring model separated patients into three prognostic groups with distinct median survival lengths of 4.8, 12.4 and 18.6 months (p < 0.0001). Internal validation revealed a concordance probability estimate of 0.65 and a time-dependent area under receiver operating curve of 0.75 at 6 months. Temporal split-sample validation implied good local generalizability to future patient populations (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Predicting survival following elective primary tumour resection using pre-operative variables has been demonstrated with the scoring model developed. Model-based survival prognostication can support clinical decisions on elective primary tumour resection eligibility.

The role of primary tumor resection in colorectal cancer patients with asymptomatic, synchronous unresectable metastasis: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Approximately 20 % of all patients with colorectal cancer are diagnosed as having Stage IV cancer; 80 % of these present with unresectable metastatic lesions. It is controversial whether chemotherapy with or without primary tumor resection (PTR) is effective for the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer with unresectable metastasis. Primary tumor resection could prevent tumor-related complications such as intestinal obstruction, perforation, bleeding, or fistula. Moreover, it may be associated with an increase in overall survival. However, surgery delays the use of systemic chemotherapy and affects the systemic spread of malignancy.

Methods/design

Patients with colon and upper rectal cancer patients with asymptomatic, synchronous, unresectable metastasis will be included after screening. They will be randomized and assigned to receive chemotherapy with or without PTR. The primary endpoint measure is 2-year overall survival rate and the secondary endpoint measures are primary tumor-related complications, quality of life, surgery-related morbidity and mortality, interventions with curative intent, chemotherapy-related toxicity, and total cost until death or study closing day. The authors hypothesize that the group receiving PTR following chemotherapy would show a 10 % improvement in 2-year overall survival, compared with the group receiving chemotherapy alone. The accrual period is 3 years and the follow-up period is 2 years. Based on the inequality design, a two-sided log-rank test with α-error of 0.05 and a power of 80 % was conducted. Allowing for a drop-out rate of 10 %, 480 patients (240 per group) will need to be recruited. Patients will be followed up at every 3 months for 3 years and then every 6 months for 2 years after the last patient has been randomized.

Discussion

This randomized controlled trial aims to investigate whether PTR with chemotherapy shows better overall survival than chemotherapy alone for patients with asymptomatic, synchronous unresectable metastasis. This trial is expected to provide evidence so support clear treatment guidelines for patients with colorectal cancer with asymptomatic, synchronous unresectable metastasis.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01978249.

Surgery for the resolution of symptoms in malignant bowel obstruction in advanced gynaecological and gastrointestinal cancer

BACKGROUND

This is an update of the original Cochrane review published in Issue 4, 2000. Intestinal obstruction commonly occurs in progressive advanced gynaecological and gastrointestinal cancers. Management of these patients is difficult due to the patients' deteriorating mobility and function (performance status), the lack of further chemotherapeutic options, and the high mortality and morbidity associated with palliative surgery. There are marked variations in clinical practice concerning surgery in these patients between different countries, gynaecological oncology units and general hospitals, as well as referral patterns from oncologists under whom these patients are often admitted.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of surgery for intestinal obstruction due to advanced gynaecological and gastrointestinal cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases for the original review in 2000 and again for this update in June 2015: CENTRAL (2015, Issue 6); MEDLINE (OVID June week 1 2015); and EMBASE (OVID week 24, 2015).We also searched relevant journals, bibliographic databases, conference proceedings, reference lists, grey literature and the world wide web for the original review in 2000; we also used personal contact. This searching of other resources yielded very few additional studies. The Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Review Group no longer routinely handsearch journals. For these reasons, we did not repeat the searching of other resources for the June 2015 update.

SELECTION CRITERIA

As the review concentrates on the 'best evidence' available for the role of surgery in malignant bowel obstruction in known advanced gynaecological and gastrointestinal cancer we kept the inclusion criteria broad (including both prospective and retrospective studies) so as to include all studies relevant to the question. We sought published trials reporting on the effects of surgery for resolving symptoms in malignant bowel obstruction for adult patients with known advanced gynaecological and gastrointestinal cancer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used data extraction forms to collect data from the studies included in the review. Two review authors extracted the data independently to reduce error. Owing to concerns about the risk of bias we decided not to conduct a meta-analysis of data and we have presented a narrative description of the study results. We planned to resolve disagreements by discussion with the third review author.

MAIN RESULTS

In total we have identified 43 studies examining 4265 participants. The original review included 938 patients from 25 studies. The updated search identified an additional 18 studies with a combined total of 3327 participants between 1997 and June 2015. The results of these studies did not change the conclusions of the original review.No firm conclusions can be drawn from the many retrospective case series so the role of surgery in malignant bowel obstruction remains controversial. Clinical resolution varies from 26.7% to over 68%, though it is often unclear how this is defined. Despite being an inadequate proxy for symptom resolution or quality of life, the ability to feed orally was a popular outcome measure, with success rates ranging from 30% to 100%. Rates of re-obstruction varied, ranging from 0% to 63%, though time to re-obstruction was often not included. Postoperative morbidity and mortality also varied widely, although again the definition of both of these surgical outcomes differed between many of the papers. There were no data available for quality of life. The reporting of adverse effects was variable and this has been described where available. Where discussed, surgical procedures varied considerably and outcomes were not reported by specific intervention. Using the 'Risk of bias' assessment tool, most included studies were at high risk of bias for most domains.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The role of surgery in malignant bowel obstruction needs careful evaluation, using validated outcome measures of symptom control and quality of life scores. Further information could include re-obstruction rates together with the morbidity associated with the various surgical procedures.Currently, bowel obstruction is managed empirically and there are marked variations in clinical practice by different units. In order to compare outcomes in malignant bowel obstruction, there needs to be a greater degree of standardisation of management.Since the last version of this review none of the new included studies have provided additional information to change the conclusions.

Conditional survival in advanced colorectal cancer and surgery

BACKGROUND

Recent data show patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) are surviving longer. What is unknown is how specific treatment modalities affect long-term survival. Conditional survival, or survival prognosis based on time already survived, is becoming an acceptable means of estimating prognosis for long-term survivors. We evaluated the impact of cancer-directed surgery on long-term survival in patients with advanced CRC.

METHODS

We used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data to identify 64,956 patients with advanced (Stage IV) CRC diagnosed from 2000-2009. Conditional survival estimates by stage, age, and cancer-directed surgery were obtained based on Cox proportional hazards regression model of disease-specific survival.

RESULTS

A total of 64,956 (20.1%) patients had advanced disease at the time of diagnosis. The proportion of those patients who underwent cancer-directed surgery was 65.1% (n = 42,176). Cancer-directed surgery for patients with advanced stage disease was associated with a significant improvement in traditional survival estimates compared to patients who did not undergo surgery (hazard ratio = 2.22 [95% confidence interval, 2.17-2.27]). Conditional survival estimates show improvement in conditional 5-y disease-specific survival across all age groups, demonstrating sustained survival benefits for selected patients with advanced CRC.

CONCLUSIONS

Five-year disease-specific conditional survival improves dramatically over time for selected patients with advanced CRC who undergo cancer-directed surgery. This information is important in determining long-term prognosis and will help inform treatment planning for advanced CRC.

Prognostic Relevance of Palliative Primary Tumor Removal in 37,793 Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Population-Based, Propensity Score-Adjusted Trend Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether palliative primary tumor resection in colorectal cancer patients with incurable stage IV disease is associated with improved survival.

BACKGROUND

There is a heated debate regarding whether or not an asymptomatic primary tumor should be removed in patients with incurable stage IV colorectal disease.

METHODS

Stage IV colorectal cancer patients were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 1998 and 2009. Patients undergoing surgery to metastatic sites were excluded. Overall survival and cancer-specific survival were compared between patients with and without palliative primary tumor resection using risk-adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression models and stratified propensity score methods.

RESULTS

Overall, 37,793 stage IV colorectal cancer patients were identified. Of those, 23,004 (60.9%) underwent palliative primary tumor resection. The rate of patients undergoing palliative primary cancer resection decreased from 68.4% in 1998 to 50.7% in 2009 (P < 0.001). In Cox regression analysis after propensity score matching primary cancer resection was associated with a significantly improved overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) of death = 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.39-0.42, P < 0.001] and cancer-specific survival (HR of death = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.38-0.40, P < 0.001). The benefit of palliative primary cancer resection persisted during the time period 1998 to 2009 with HRs equal to or less than 0.47 for both overall and cancer-specific survival.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of this population-based cohort of stage IV colorectal cancer patients, palliative primary tumor resection was associated with improved overall and cancer-specific survival. Therefore, the dogma that an asymptomatic primary tumor never should be resected in patients with unresectable colorectal cancer metastases must be questioned.

GRECCAR 8: impact on survival of the primary tumor resection in rectal cancer with unresectable synchronous metastasis: a randomized multicentre study

BACKGROUND

A majority of patients with rectal cancer and metastasis are not eligible to curative treatment because of an extensive and unresectable metastatic disease. Primary tumor resection is still debated in this situation. Rectal surgery treats or prevents the symptoms and avoids the risk of acute complications related to the primary tumor. Several studies on colorectal cancers seem to show interesting results in terms of survival in favor to the resection of the primary tumor. To date, no randomized trial or even a prospective study has assessed the impact of primary tumor resection on overall survival in patients with colorectal cancer with unresectable metastasis. All published studies were retrospective and included colon and rectal cancers. Rectal cancer is associated with specific problems related to the rectal surgery. Surgery is more complex, and may be source of more morbidity and postoperative functional dysfunctions (stoma, digestive, sexual, urinary) than colic surgery. On the other hand, symptoms related to the progression of rectal tumor are often very disabling: pain, rectal syndrome.

METHODS/DESIGN

GRECCAR 8 is a multicentre randomized open-label controlled trial aimed to evaluate the impact on survival of the primary tumor resection in rectal cancer with unresectable synchronous metastasis. Patients must undergo upfront systemic chemotherapy for at least 4 courses before inclusion. Patients with progressive metastatic disease during upfront chemotherapy will be excluded from the study. Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to Arm A: primary tumor resection followed by systemic chemotherapy versus Arm B: systemic chemotherapy alone. Primary endpoint will be overall survival measured from the date of randomization to the date of death or to the end of follow-up (2 years). Secondary endpoints will include progression-free survival, quality of life, toxicity of chemotherapy, response of the primary tumor and metastatic disease to chemotherapy, postoperative morbidity and mortality, rate of patient not eligible for postoperative chemotherapy (arm A), primary tumor related complications and rate of emergency surgery (arm B). The number of patients needed is 290.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT02314182.

The role of palliative resection for asymptomatic primary tumor in patients with unresectable stage IV colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognostic role of surgical resection of primary tumors is not well established in patients with asymptomatic unresectable stage IV colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to reveal the prognostic role of surgical resection of primary tumors and to define prognostic factors affecting long-term oncological outcomes in patients with asymptomatic unresectable synchronous metastases.

DESIGN

This study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.

PATIENTS

Between 2000 and 2008, a total of 416 patients with asymptomatic unresectable stage IV colorectal cancer were analyzed with propensity score matching.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prematching baseline characteristics were compared by bivariate analysis, and 113 pairs were selected after 1:1 matching with propensity scores estimated from logistic regression. The primary end point was overall survival.

RESULTS

Among 416 patients, 218 (52.4%) underwent palliative resection of the primary tumor. Before propensity score matching, palliative resection resulted in a better survival rate than nonresection in univariate analysis (p < 0.001), but not in multivariate analysis (p = 0.08). After matching, the 5-year overall survival rate was significantly lower for patients with peritoneal metastasis and clinical M1b stage tumors in univariate analysis (p = 0.004 and p = 0.02). However, neither peritoneal metastasis nor clinical M1b stage showed any prognostic significance in multivariate analysis. The overall 5-year survival rate of the postmatching group was 4.9% and 3.5% in the palliative resection and nonresection groups. Consequently, palliative resection was not associated with a significant increase in survival compared with nonresection (p = 0.27). A subgroup analysis performed according to the site of metastasis also did not show any significant survival benefit of palliative resection after matching.

LIMITATIONS

Selection bias and potential confounders were limitations of this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Resection of the primary tumor in patients with asymptomatic unresectable stage IV colorectal cancer was not associated with an improvement in overall survival after propensity score matching.

Prognostic Implications of Primary Tumor Resection in Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer in Elderly Patients

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors in stage IVB colorectal cancer in elderly patients, focusing on the influence of treatment modalities, including palliative chemotherapy and primary tumor resection.

METHODS

A cohort of 64 patients aged over 65 years who presented with stage IVB colorectal cancer at the Gangneung Asan Hospital between July 1, 2001, and December 31, 2009, was analyzed. Demographics, tumor location, tumor grade, performance status, levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), level of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and distant metastatic site at diagnosis were analyzed. Using the treatment histories, we analyzed the prognostic implications of palliative chemotherapy and surgical resection of the primary tumor retrospectively.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 30 male (46.9%) and 34 female patients (53.1%); the median age was 76.5 years. Primary tumor resection was done on 28 patients (43.8%); 36 patients (56.2%) were categorized in the nonresection group. The median survival times were 12.43 months in the resection group and 3.58 months in the nonresection group (P < 0.001). Gender, level of CEA, level of AST, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, tumor location, and presence of liver metastasis also showed significant differences in overall survival. On multivariate analysis, male gender, higher level of CEA, higher AST level, and no primary tumor resection were independent poor prognostic factors. In particular, nonresection of the primary tumor was the most potent/poor prognostic factor in the elderly-patient study group (P = 0.001; 95% confidence interval, 2.33 to 21.99; hazard ratio, 7.16).

CONCLUSION

In stage IVB colorectal cancer in elderly patients, resection of the primary tumor may enhance survival.

Palliative care and end-stage colorectal cancer management: The surgeon meets the oncologist

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common neoplasia in the Western countries, with considerable morbidity and mortality. Every fifth patient with CRC presents with metastatic disease, which is not curable with radical intent in roughly 80% of cases. Traditionally approached surgically, by resection of the primitive tumor or stoma, the management to incurable stage IV CRC patients has significantly changed over the last three decades and is nowadays multidisciplinary, with a pivotal role played by chemotherapy (CHT). This latter have allowed for a dramatic increase in survival, whereas the role of colonic and liver surgery is nowadays matter of debate. Although any generalization is difficult, two main situations are considered, asymptomatic (or minimally symptomatic) and severely symptomatic patients needing aggressive management, including emergency cases. In asymptomatic patients, new CHT regimens allow today long survival in selected patients, also exceeding two years. The role of colonic resection in this group has been challenged in recent years, as it is not clear whether the resection of primary CRC may imply a further increase in survival, thus justifying surgery-related morbidity/mortality in such a class of short-living patients. Secondary surgery of liver metastasis is gaining acceptance since, under new generation CHT regimens, an increasing amount of patients with distant metastasis initially considered non resectable become resectable, with a significant increase in long term survival. The management of CRC emergency patients still represents a major issue in Western countries, and is associated to high morbidity/mortality. Obstruction is traditionally approached surgically by colonic resection, stoma or internal by-pass, although nowadays CRC stenting is a feasible option. Nevertheless, CRC stent has peculiar contraindications and complications, and its long-term cost-effectiveness is questionable, especially in the light of recently increased survival. Perforation is associated with the highest mortality and remains mostly matter for surgeons, by abdominal lavage/drainage, colonic resection and/or stoma. Bleeding and other CRC-related symptoms (pain, tenesmus, etc.) may be managed by several mini-invasive approaches, including radiotherapy, laser therapy and other transanal procedures.

[Metastasized colonic cancer. When are there no indications for primary resection?]

The determination of an optimal treatment protocol for colonic cancer with synchronous incurable metastases remains a challenge, especially if the primary tumor is asymptomatic. Available data on whether resection of the primary tumor means a benefit or a danger to the patient are limited and inhomogeneous. A survival benefit could be shown only in retrospective studies with a bias against primary chemotherapy. The important question of the quality of life (QOL) remains completely unanswered in this respect. There are numerous groups and guidelines in favor of a primary palliative chemotherapy for these patients, possibly intensified by antibodies. The results of the currently ongoing randomized multicenter SYNCHRONUS study will deliver objective data facilitating the decision-making process with respect to the indications for resection of the primary tumor or primary chemotherapy.

Palliative surgery in patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases: a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The current study was primarily intended to determine the best surgical treatment for patients with unresectable liver metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). In addition, we assessed whether the improvement in survival resulting from palliative resection (PR) of the primary tumor was a function of the extent of liver metastasis.

METHODS

The demographics, tumor characteristics, and survival outcomes of 261 patients who underwent palliative surgery for unresectable liver metastatic CRC were analyzed. A propensity-score model was used to compare the group of patients receiving PR and non-resection (NR).

RESULTS

There were 195 PR patients and 66 NR. The median survival of PR and NR patients was 21 months and 10 months, respectively (P < 0.001). In a Cox multivariate analysis of 51 propensity-score matched pairs, PR resulted in longer survival than NR (Hazard Ratio for NR 1.481; 95% confidence interval: 1.003-2.185; P = 0.048). The extent of liver metastasis only led to better survival of PR than NR patients among patients with limited liver metastasis not among those with extensive liver metastasis (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PR appears to result in better survival than NR when the patient's overall condition permits an aggressive approach, especially in patients with limited liver metastases.

Should noncurative resection of the primary tumour be performed in patients with stage iv colorectal cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Surgical resection of the primary tumour in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (crc) remains controversial. This review compares survival in patients with advanced crc who underwent surgical resection of the primary tumour with that in patients not undergoing resection, and determines rates of post-operative mortality and nonfatal complications, the primary tumour complication rate, the non-resection surgical procedures rate, and quality of life (qol).

METHODS

Reports in the central, medline, and embase databases were searched for relevant studies, which were selected using pre-specified eligibility criteria. The search was also restricted to publication dates from 1980 onward, the English language, and studies involving human subjects. Screening, evaluation of relevant articles, and data abstraction were performed in duplicate, and agreement between the abstractors was assessed. Articles that met the inclusion criteria were assessed for quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were collected and synthesized per protocol.

RESULTS

From among the 3379 reports located, fifteen retrospective observational studies were selected. Of the 12,416 patients in the selected studies, 8620 (69%) underwent surgery. Median survival was 15.2 months (range: 10-30.7 months) in the resection group and 11.4 months (range: 3-22 months) in the non-resection group. Hazard ratio for survival was 0.69 [95% confidence interval (ci): 0.61 to 0.79] favouring surgical resection. Mean rates of postoperative mortality and nonfatal complications were 4.9% (95% ci: 0% to 9.7%) and 25.9% (95%ci: 20.1% to 31.6%) respectively. The mean primary tumour complication rate was 29.7% (95% ci: 18.5% to 41.0%), and the non-resection surgical procedures rate in the non-resection group was 27.6% (95 ci: 15.4% to 39.9%). No study provided qol data.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this review supports primary tumour resection in advanced crc, the results have significant biases. Randomized trials are warranted to confirm the findings.

The Role of Surgery for Asymptomatic Primary Tumors in Unresectable Stage IV Colorectal Cancer

There are still debates regarding the appropriate primary treatment policy for asymptomatic primary colorectal lesions in cases of unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. Even though there are patients with asymptomatic primary tumors when starting chemotherapy, those patients may still undergo surgery due to complications related to primary tumors in the middle of chemotherapy; therefore, controversy exists regarding surgical resection of primary colorectal lesions in cases where symptoms are absent when making a diagnosis. Thus, based on the published literature, we discuss opinions that prefer first-line surgery for primary tumors as well as opinions favoring first-line chemotherapy for treating unresectable synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer. Although the upfront chemotherapy including targeted agents is suggested as an effective treatment in recent years, the first line surgery has been a preferred treatment for decades. The first line surgery is beneficial to prolong the survival duration given the retrospective analysis of randomized trial data. So far, no prospective comparison study has only focused on the first-line treatment modality; thus, future clinical studies focusing on the survival duration and the quality of life should be performed as soon as possible. Furthermore, at this point, multidisciplinary team approaches would be helpful in finding the appropriate therapy. Regardless of symptoms, the performance status and the tumor burden should be taken into consideration as well. In case of surgical resection, minimally invasive surgery, such as laparoscopic surgery, is recommended.

The Role of Surgery for Asymptomatic Primary Tumors in Unresectable Stage IV Colorectal Cancer

There are still debates regarding the appropriate primary treatment policy for asymptomatic primary colorectal lesions in cases of unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. Even though there are patients with asymptomatic primary tumors when starting chemotherapy, those patients may still undergo surgery due to complications related to primary tumors in the middle of chemotherapy; therefore, controversy exists regarding surgical resection of primary colorectal lesions in cases where symptoms are absent when making a diagnosis. Thus, based on the published literature, we discuss opinions that prefer first-line surgery for primary tumors as well as opinions favoring first-line chemotherapy for treating unresectable synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer. Although the upfront chemotherapy including targeted agents is suggested as an effective treatment in recent years, the first line surgery has been a preferred treatment for decades. The first line surgery is beneficial to prolong the survival duration given the retrospective analysis of randomized trial data. So far, no prospective comparison study has only focused on the first-line treatment modality; thus, future clinical studies focusing on the survival duration and the quality of life should be performed as soon as possible. Furthermore, at this point, multidisciplinary team approaches would be helpful in finding the appropriate therapy. Regardless of symptoms, the performance status and the tumor burden should be taken into consideration as well. In case of surgical resection, minimally invasive surgery, such as laparoscopic surgery, is recommended.

Long-term results of the "liver first" approach in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases

BACKGROUND

There are no reports available on the long-term outcome of patients with the "liver first" approach.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to present the long-term results of the "liver first" approach in our center.

DESIGN

This study is a retrospective analysis.

SETTING

This study was conducted at a tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Patients from May 2003 to March 2009 were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases were first treated for their liver metastases. If the treatment was successful, patients underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for the rectal cancer. If metastases could not be resected, resection of the rectal primary was not routinely performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measured was long-term results of the "liver first" approach.

RESULTS

Of the 42 patients included (median age, 61 years), all but one (98%) started with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In total, 31 (74%) patients completed the "liver first" approach. In 11 patients, curative therapy was not possible because of unresectable metastases; in 10 of these patients (91%), the primary tumor was not resected.

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited because it was a retrospective analysis without a control group.

CONCLUSIONS

By applying the "liver first" approach, the majority of this group of patients (74%) could undergo curative treatment of both metastatic and primary disease in combination with optimal neoadjuvant therapy. This strategy may avoid unnecessary rectal surgery in patients with incurable metastatic disease. In this selected patient group, long-term survival may be achieved with a 5-year survival rate of 67%.

Palliative excisional surgery for primary colorectal cancer in patients with incurable metastatic disease. Is there a survival benefit? A systematic review

AIM

Patients with stage IV colorectal cancer with unresectable metastases can either receive chemotherapy or palliative resection of the primary lesion. In the absence of any randomized data the choice of initial treatment in stage IV colorectal cancer is not based on firm evidence.

METHOD

A search of MEDLINE, Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Library database was performed from 1980 to 2010 for studies comparing palliative resection in stage IV colorectal cancer with other treatment modalities. Audits and observational studies were excluded. Median survival was the primary outcome measure. The morbidity and mortality of surgical and nonsurgical treatments were compared.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies (no randomized controlled trials) were identified. Most demonstrated a survival benefit for patients who underwent palliative resection. Multivariate analysis indicates that tumour burden and performance status are both major independent prognostic variables. Selection bias, incomplete follow up and nonstandardized reporting of complications make the data difficult to interpret.

CONCLUSION

The studies indicate that there may be a survival benefit for primary resection of colorectal cancer in stage IV disease. The findings suggest that resection of the primary tumour should be based on tumour burden and performance status rather than on the presence or absence of symptoms alone.

Laparoscopic surgery for palliative resection of the primary tumor in incurable stage IV colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic palliative resection in patients with incurable stage IV colorectal cancer.

METHODS

We reviewed 100 patients with incurable stage IV colorectal cancer who underwent palliative resection of the primary tumor between 2002 and 2009 at National Cancer Center Hospital East (NCCHE). Outcomes and postoperative course were compared between patients who underwent open and laparoscopic surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 100 patients, 22 were treated with a laparoscopic procedure and 78 underwent an open surgical procedure. There was no difference in the preoperative characteristics of the two groups. In the laparoscopic group, the mean operation time was significantly longer (177 vs. 148 min, p = 0.007) and the amount of blood loss was significantly lower (166 vs. 361 ml, p = 0.002). Postoperative complications occurred in 5 patients (22.7 %) after laparoscopic surgery and in 21 patients (26.9 %) after open surgery, with no significant difference between the two groups. Time to flatus, time to start of food intake, and hospital stay were all shorter after laparoscopic surgery (3.0 vs. 3.8 days, p = 0.003; 3.6 vs. 5.0 days, p < 0.001; and 12.0 vs. 15.0 days, p = 0.005; respectively). Significantly more patients in the laparoscopic group had >15 % lymphocytes on postoperative day 7 (p = 0.049). Overall survival rates were 73.7 and 75.5 % at 1 year after laparoscopic surgery and open surgery, respectively (p = 0.344).

CONCLUSIONS

A laparoscopic procedure should be considered for palliative resection of the primary tumor for incurable stage IV colorectal cancer, because the results of this study indicate that the procedure is safe and effective.

Multivariate Analysis of the Survival Rate for Treatment Modalities in Incurable Stage IV Colorectal Cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare survival in patients that underwent palliative resection treatment versus non-resection for incurable colorectal cancer (ICRC).

METHODS

The case records of 201 patients with ICRC between January 2000 and December 2009 were reviewed. Demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, the location of the colon cancer, histology, metastasis, treatment options and median survival were analyzed retrospectively. We divided the patients into four groups according to the treatment modalities: resection alone, resection with post-operative chemotherapy, non-resection treatment by chemotherapy alone, and stent or bypass. Median survival times were compared according to each treatment option, and the survival rates were analyzed.

RESULTS

105 patients underwent palliative resection whereas 96 were treated with non-resection modalities. A palliative resection was performed in 44 cases for resection alone and in 61 cases for resection with post-operative chemotherapy. In patients treated with non-resection of the primary tumor, chemotherapy alone was done in 65 cases and stent or bypass in 31 cases. Multivariate analysis showed a median survival of 14 months in patients with palliative resections with post-operative chemotherapy, which was significantly higher than those for chemotherapy alone (8 months), primary tumor resection alone (5 months), and stent or bypass (5 months). Gender, age, ASA score, CEA level, the location of colon cancer, histology and the presence of multiple metastases were not independent factors in association with the median survival rate.

CONCLUSION

In the treatment of ICRC, palliative resection followed by post-operative chemotherapy shows the most favorable median survival compared to other treatment options.

The outcome after stent placement or surgery as the initial treatment for obstructive primary tumor in patients with stage IV colon cancer

BACKGROUND

It is still a matter of debate as to whether palliative resection of obstructive primary tumors may prolong the survival of patients with obstructive colon cancer and unresectable synchronous metastases. The main goal of this retrospective study was to compare the use of self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) with open surgery for the palliation of patients with respect to survival, morbidity, and the time to start chemotherapy.

METHODS

Between January 2000 and January 2008, 88 consecutive patients (52 who underwent surgery and 36 who underwent SEMS insertion) with obstructive colon cancer and unresectable synchronous metastases were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

The median hospital stay for all admissions was 7.2 days (range, 3-29 days) in the SEMS group and 12.3 days (range, 6-45 days) in the surgery group (P = .001). The incidence of stoma formation was significantly lower in the SEMS group than in the surgery group (16.7% vs 38.5%, respectively, P = .021). The median time to starting chemotherapy was significantly shorter in patients who underwent SEMS insertion compared with those who underwent surgery (8.1 vs 21.7 days, respectively, P = .001). The 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 44.2% and 21.27% in the surgery group and 16.7% and 2.8% in the SEMS group, respectively. The median survival for all patients was 15 months from the initiation of treatment (95% confidence interval, 6.0-19 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Both procedures can be safely performed, but the choice of treatment should be individualized and discussed with a multidisciplinary team.

Surgery of the primary in stage IV colorectal cancer with unresectable metastases

Surgery plays an important role in the treatment of patients with limited metastatic disease of colorectal cancer (CRC). Long term survival and cure is reported in 20-50% of highly selected patients with oligometastatic disease who underwent surgery. This paper describes the role of surgery of the primary tumour in patients with unresectable stage IV colorectal cancer. Owing to the increased efficacy of chemotherapeutic regimens in stage IV colorectal cancer, complications from unresected primary tumours are relatively infrequent. The risk of emergency surgical intervention is less than 15% in patients with synchronous metastatic disease who are treated with chemotherapy. Therefore, there is a tendency among surgeons not to resect the primary tumour in case of unresectable metastases. However, it is suggested that resection of the primary tumour in case of unresectable metastatic disease might influence overall survival. All studies described in the literature (n = 24) are non-randomised and the majority is single-centre and retrospective of nature. Most studies are in favour of resection of the primary tumour in patients with symptomatic lesions. In asymptomatic patients the results are less clear, although median overall survival seems to be improved in resected patients in the majority of studies. The major drawback of all these studies is that primarily patients with a better performance status and better prognosis (less metastatic sites involved) are being operated on. Another limitation of these studies is that few if any data on the use of systemic therapy are presented, which makes it difficult to assess the relative contribution of resection on outcome. Prospective studies on this topic are warranted, and are currently being planned.

CONCLUSION

Surgery of the primary tumour in patients with synchronous metastasised CRC is controversial, although data from the literature suggest that resection might be a positive prognostic factor for survival. Therefore prospective studies on the value of resection in this setting are required.

Prognostic value of resection of primary tumor in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis of two randomized studies and a review of the literature

Background

In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with an asymptomatic primary tumor, there is no consensus on the indication for resection of the primary tumor.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on the outcome of stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with or without resection of the primary tumor treated in the phase III CAIRO and CAIRO2 studies. A review of the literature was performed.

Results

In the CAIRO and CAIRO2 studies, 258 and 289 patients had undergone a primary tumor resection and 141 and 159 patients had not, respectively. In the CAIRO study, a significantly better median overall survival and progression-free survival was observed for the resection compared to the nonresection group, with 16.7 vs. 11.4 months [P < 0.0001, hazard ratio (HR) 0.61], and 6.7 vs. 5.9 months (P = 0.004; HR 0.74), respectively. In the CAIRO2 study, median overall survival and progression-free survival were also significantly better for the resection compared to the nonresection group, with 20.7 vs. 13.4 months (P < 0.0001; HR 0.65) and 10.5 vs. 7.8 months (P = 0.014; HR 0.78), respectively. These differences remained significant in multivariate analyses. Our review identified 22 nonrandomized studies, most of which showed improved survival for mCRC patients who underwent resection of the primary tumor.

Conclusions

Our results as well as data from literature indicate that resection of the primary tumor is a prognostic factor for survival in stage IV CRC patients. The potential bias of these results warrants prospective studies on the value of resection of primary tumor in this setting; such studies are currently being planned.

Elective palliative resection of incurable stage IV colorectal cancer: who really benefits from it?

PURPOSE

Despite the encouraging results of chemotherapy in patients affected by incurable colorectal cancer (CRC), surgical resection of a primitive tumor is still a common approach worldwide. The identification of prognostic factors related to short survival (<6 months) may allow excluding from resective surgery those who may not benefit from it.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of 15 variables in a population of 71 patients undergoing nonemergency palliative primary resections of incurable CRC, including patients' demographics and clinical/histopathological characteristics of the tumor.

RESULTS

No variables were related to perioperative mortality (8.5% overall). A multivariate analysis revealed that older age (≥80 years) and metastasis to more than 25% of the lymph nodes were associated with survival (4 and 6 months, respectively). Mucoid adenocarcinoma therefore tends to be associated with the prognosis (P = 0.070).

CONCLUSIONS

An elderly age tends to be a contraindication to an elective primary tumor resection in patients affected by incurable CRC. Massive lymph node involvement and mucoid adenocarcinoma should also be considered before planning major colonic surgery.

Laparoscopic resection of advanced colorectal cancer

Background

Palliative resection of the primary tumour in asymptomatic patients with stage IV colorectal cancer is associated with improved survival and fewer complications. Laparoscopic surgery is widely employed in the curative treatment of colorectal cancer, but its value in advanced colorectal cancer remains unclear.

Methods

All patients who underwent laparoscopic resection of primary colorectal cancer in this unit between June 1991 and Jan 2010 were entered into a prospective computerized database. Outcomes for patients with laparoscopic resection of stage IV colorectal cancer were compared with those of patients who had laparoscopic surgery for stage I disease.

Results

Some 185 patients with stage IV colorectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic resection were compared with 310 patients who had stage I colorectal cancer. Some 94·1 and 98·4 per cent of operations respectively were completed laparoscopically. Hospital stay was slightly longer in the group with stage IV disease (mean 6·2 versus 5·3 days; P = 0·091). The 30-day mortality rate was 2·7 per cent in patients with stage IV disease and 0·6 per cent in those with stage I tumours (P = 0·061). There was no difference in complications. One-year survival rates were 77·8 and 99·0 per cent respectively (P &lt; 0·001).

Conclusion

Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for stage IV colorectal cancer in selected patients are equivalent to those for stage I cancers.

Nonresectional palliative abdominal surgery for patients with advanced colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

Nonresectional palliative abdominal surgery (e.g. defunctioning stoma/bypass) may be appropriate for patients unsuitable for curative resection, to deal with complications of advanced colorectal malignancy such as obstruction. Our aim was to review the outcome of surgery in these patients within our institution.

METHOD

All patients undergoing palliative surgery without resection for colorectal carcinoma between July 1998 and January 2007 were identified from our prospectively compiled colorectal cancer database. Data were extracted related to patients' demographics, presentation, tumour site, operative intervention, complications, oncological therapies, length of hospital stay and postoperative survival.

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety-three patients were identified with a median age of 79 years (31-94 years). Fifty per cent were operated on an emergent basis for obstruction or perforation, and 50% on an elective basis. One hundred and sixty-nine patients had defunctioning stomas formed of which 156 were loop stomas. Twenty-four patients underwent bypass procedures. Thirty-day mortality rate was 13.5% and postoperative morbidity rate 47%. Median survival was 247 days, with 1-year survival of 38%. Patients undergoing operation on an emergent basis had poorer long-term survival (127 vs 320 days, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Nonresectional palliative abdominal surgery is associated with relatively high morbidity and mortality, particularly when performed in the emergency setting. However, in this patient group with a very poor outlook, it may be offered with reasonable survival expectations.

Impact of resection for primary colorectal cancer on outcomes in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases

PURPOSE

This study was designed to evaluate the impact of resection for primary colorectal cancer on oncologic outcomes in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 91 consecutive patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases who underwent resection of the primary colorectal cancer between December 1999 and December 2007. Of the 91 patients, 54 (59.3%) also underwent complete (R0) resection for liver metastases, and 84 (92.3%) received postoperative chemotherapy. The oncologic outcomes and prognostic factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

Operative mortality was 1.1%, and morbidity was 37.4%. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 44.5% and 26.8%, respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed that residual disease after surgery (non-R0 resection; p = 0.003), lymph node metastasis of the primary tumor (p = 0.015), and no postoperative chemotherapy (p = 0.001) were independent prognostic factors for poor survival. Independent predictors of an inability to achieve a complete resection were the presence of three or more liver metastases and the presence of extrahepatic disease at exploration. Significant differences in survival existed among the three risk stratification groups (no-, low-, and high-risk groups; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The inability to safely render the liver and colon microscopically free of disease should cause a surgeon to reconsider synchronous colectomy and hepatectomy. A multidisciplinary approach that combines both complete resection of synchronous colorectal liver metastases and postoperative chemotherapy may achieve improved survival in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases.

Primary site resection is superior for incurable metastatic colorectal cancer

AIM: To investigate survival in patients treated with FOLFOX followed by primary site resection or palliative surgery for incurable metastatic colorectal cancer.

METHODS: Between 2001 and 2009, a total of 98 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma and non-resectable metastases were diagnosed and treated with the new systemic agent chemotherapy regimen FOLFOX. Primary site resection was carried out in 38 patients, creation of a colostomy or bypass without resection was carried out in 36 patients, and 23 were not operated on because of advanced disease. The survival times of patients in different groups were analyzed.

RESULTS: There were no differences between the patients regarding their general condition, concurrent disease, or tumor stage according to AJCC classification. The median survivals of the three groups were 30.6, 20.8, and 12.7 mo (log-rank P value < 0.05), respectively. The postoperative complication rate was higher in the primary site resection group than in the palliative surgery group.

CONCLUSION: The results indicate that there are benefits from primary site resection for incurable metastatic colorectal cancer with systemic chemotherapy.

Meta-analysis of survival of patients with stage IV colorectal cancer managed with surgical resection versus chemotherapy alone

BACKGROUND There is no consensus regarding the appropriate management of asymptomatic and minimally symptomatic patients with stage IV colorectal cancer and irresectable metastases. METHODS A literature search was conducted on Medline and Embase. Outcome measures included: survival; postoperative morbidity and mortality; complications from the primary tumor and the need for surgery to manage complications; the likelihood of curative surgery after initial response to primary therapy; and length of hospital stay. Quantitative meta-analysis was performed where appropriate. RESULTS Eight retrospective studies, including 1,062 patients, met the criteria for inclusion in this study. Meta-analysis has shown an improvement in the survival of patients managed with palliative resection of their primary tumor, with an estimated standardized median difference of 6.0 months (standardized difference, 0.55; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.29, 0.82; p < 0.001). Patients managed with chemotherapy alone were 7.3 times more likely to have a complication from the primary tumor (95% CI, 1.7, 34.4; p = 0.008). There was no difference in the response rates to chemotherapy, making metastatic disease amendable to curative resection (0.85; 95% CI 0.40, 1.8; p = 0.662). CONCLUSIONS To date, only retrospective data are available, showing that palliative resection of the primary tumor in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients with stage IV colorectal cancer is associated with longer survival. Resection of the primary tumor reduces the likelihood of complications from the primary tumor and avoids the need for emergency procedures.

Impact of palliative chemotherapy and surgery on management of stage IV incurable colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Recent trials proposed chemotherapy (CHT) as the treatment of choice for patients affected by incurable colorectal cancer (ICRC). Nevertheless, surgery is still commonly offered to these patients. On the other hand, CHT is offered to ICRC patients regardless of the pattern of spread of the disease, local or distant, despite some evidence suggesting that metastatic pattern may influence the response to treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of 133 patients undergoing palliative treatment for ICRC from 1994 through 2007. Palliation consisted of surgery alone until 2002 and surgery with CHT (FOLFOX-FOLFIRI) thereafter. The impact of CHT and surgery was evaluated in the whole series as well as with respect to metastatic pattern (locally aggressive primary tumor and distant metastasis only), tumor site, and grading.

RESULTS

Chemotherapy prolonged survival by 9 months (p = 0.001). In patients undergoing CHT, resective surgery did not prolong survival (p = 0.931), whereas in patients not undergoing CHT, it improved prognosis by 5 months (p = 0.023). Considering patients with distant metastasis only, CHT significantly prolonged survival (p < 0.001), whereas it did not improve the prognosis of patients with a locally aggressive primary tumor (p = 0.943). No difference in CHT effectiveness with respect to tumor site and grading was recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

CHT should be the preferred option in patients undergoing elective treatment for ICRC, whereas surgery should be considered whenever CHT is not administered. CHT significantly increases survival of patients with unresectable distant metastasis only, whereas it seems to be useless in patients with locally aggressive primary tumors.

Control of pelvic symptoms in patients with rectal cancer and synchronous metastases

OBJECTIVE

The optimal treatment strategy for rectal cancer (RC) with synchronous metastases remains an issue of debate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of surgery and radiation on the control of pelvic symptoms in this setting.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with RC and synchronous metastases were retrospectively assessed and divided into four treatment groups: surgical resection of rectal tumor (S); radiotherapy with/without chemotherapy followed by surgery (CRTS); chemoradiotherapy (CRT); and chemotherapy only (CT). Each group was evaluated in terms of duration of pelvic symptom-free periods (relative to overall survival).

RESULTS

A total of 96 patients were evaluated: S: n=30; CRTS: n=21; CRT: n=27; and CT: n=18. After treatment, pelvic symptoms persisted in 14.7% patients (S=0%, CRTS=7.1%, CRT=31.8%, CT=25%; P=0.01). The relative pelvic symptom-free periods were 93.0% in the S group, 83.1% in the CRTS group, 53.0% in the CRT group and 53.2% in the CT group (P<0.01). On multivariate analysis, only surgical treatment correlated with a significant relative pelvic symptom-free period (P<0.01), with an adjusted hazards ratio of 2.80 [95% CI: 1.79-4.39].

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that rectal resection was the most effective therapeutic procedure in selected patients with RC and synchronous metastases, offering the patients the longest pelvic symptom-free periods.

Determinants of morbidity and survival after elective non-curative resection of stage IV colon and rectal cancer

PURPOSE

The benefit of elective primary tumor resection for non-curable stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) remains largely undefined. We wanted to identify risk factors for postoperative complications and short survival.

METHODS

Using a prospective database, we analyzed potential risk factors in 233 patients, who were electively operated for non-curable stage IV CRC between 1996 and 2002. Patients with recurrent tumors, resectable metastases, emergency operations, and non-resective surgery were excluded. Risk factors for increased postoperative morbidity and limited postoperative survival were identified by multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Patients with colon cancer (CC = 156) and rectal cancer (RC = 77) were comparable with regard to age, sex, comorbidity, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, carcinoembryonic antigen levels, hepatic spread, tumor grade, resection margins, 30-day mortality (CC 5.1%, RC 3.9%) and postoperative chemotherapy. pT4 tumors, carcinomatosis, and non-anatomical resections were more common in colon cancer patients, whereas enterostomies (CC 1.3%, RC 67.5%, p < 0.0001), anastomotic leaks (CC 7.7%, RC 24.2%, p = 0.002), and total surgical complications (CC 19.9%, RC 40.3%, p = 0.001) were more frequent after rectal surgery. Independent determinants of an increased postoperative morbidity were primary rectal cancer, hepatic tumor load >50%, and comorbidity >1 organ. Prognostic factors for limited postoperative survival were hepatic tumor load >50%, pT4 tumors, lymphatic spread, R1-2 resection, and lack of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Palliative resection is associated with a particularly unfavorable outcome in rectal cancer patients presenting with a locally advanced tumor (pT4, expected R2 resection) or an extensive comorbidity, and in all CRC patients who show a hepatic tumor load >50%. For such patients, surgery might be contraindicated unless the tumor is immediately life-threatening.

Effectiveness of stent placement for palliative treatment in malignant colorectal obstruction and predictive factors for stent occlusion

BACKGROUND

Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) for malignant colorectal obstruction is widely used in palliative treatment and as an alternative to surgery. The aims of this study are to evaluate the effectiveness of stent placement for palliative treatment and to identify the predictive factors associated with stent occlusion.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed in 55 patients who had undergone placement of an uncovered SEMS from February 2004 to April 2007 for palliative treatment of malignant colorectal obstruction with metastatic or locally advanced cancer that was surgically unresectable. We analyzed the technical and clinical outcomes of stent placement, complications related to the procedure, stent patency rate, and predictive factors associated with stent occlusion.

RESULTS

The causes of colorectal obstruction before stent placement were primary colorectal cancer in 42 patients and noncolorectal extrinsic cancer in 13 patients. The initial technical success rate was 98.2%, and the clinical success rate was 94.4%. Complications occurred in 17 patients (30.9%). These included stent occlusion (n = 8), migration (n = 6), bowel perforation (n = 1), stent distortion (n = 1), and fistula formation (n = 1). The mean and median stent patency periods were 184 days [95% confidence interval (CI), 137-230 days] and 141 days (95% CI, 69-213 days), respectively. The degree of expansion 48 h after stent placement was significantly better in the nonocclusion group than in the stent occlusion group. In the multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, insufficient stent expansion (<70%) 48 h after stent placement was significantly associated with an increase in stent occlusion during the follow-up period (odds ratio, 12.55; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Uncovered SEMS placement is an effective palliative treatment for malignant colorectal obstruction. The degree of stent expansion 48 h after stent placement is significantly associated with the maintenance of stent patency and is a predictive factor for stent occlusion.

Adoption of self-expanding metallic stents in the palliative treatment of obstructive colorectal cancer-look out for perforations!

Self-expanding metallic stents (SEMSs) are increasingly used for the palliative treatment of inoperable colorectal cancer. The aim of the current study was to analyze the safety and efficacy of SEMS in the palliative treatment of obstructive colorectal cancer. Between 2003 and 2006, SEMS placement was attempted in 26 patients suffering from inoperable obstructive colorectal cancer. The recovery of the patients and the outcome of this treatment modality were analyzed prospectively. SEMS was successfully inserted in 19 (73%) of 26 patients. In 16 (84%) of these 19 cases, the placement of SEMS was the definitive treatment of colorectal obstruction and no additional surgical palliation was needed. There were 3 (16%) colonic perforations related to stent application. SEMS insertion seems to be an effective alternative in the palliative treatment of patients with malignant colorectal obstruction. However, perforation is a dangerous complication of the procedure.

Prognosis analysis and treatment strategy for patients with Dukes D stage rectal cancer

AIM: To evaluate the metastasis distribution, prognosis and treatment strategy for patients with Dukes D stage rectal cancer.

METHODS: Clinical data, type distribution and prognosis of 301 cases with Dukes D stage rectal cancer who underwent surgery from May 1991 to August 2003 were retrospectively analyzed using Log-rank and Kapla-Meier test.

RESULTS: The patients with Dukes D stage were associated with a mean OS (overall survival) of 32.50 ± 3.22 months, and OS rate were 64.61% (1 year), 26.40% (3 years) and 15.15% (5 years), respectively. The prognosis was related to factors such as gross type, tumor differentiation, T stage and surgery type. 32.56% patients underwent side-side anastomosis and no primary-cancer-directed surgery, and 67.44% patients underwent primary-cancer-directed surgery. Patients had significantly benefited from palliative resection in terms of overall survival (P = 0.0158). The patients with Dukes D stage were 10.29% with peritoneal carcinomatosis, 32.55% with local infiltration, 40.53% with distant metastasis, and 16.61% with complex metastasis. The prognosis among metastasis type was not significantly different (P = 0.4122). Patients with synchronous liver metastases accounted for 51.4% of all cases, and 84.23% for distant metastasis, which had a mean OS of 32.50 ± 3.22 months and had relatively longer life expectancy.

CONCLUSION: Patients of Dukes D stage rectal cancer show no significant difference regardless of metastasis type, and primary-cancer-directed surgery should be actively performed and the postoperative OS rate and quality of life can be improved.

Management of patients with asymptomatic colorectal cancer and synchronous irresectable metastases

BACKGROUND

In patients with asymptomatic colorectal cancer with irresectable metastatic disease, the optimal treatment strategy remains controversial. Resection of the primary tumor followed by chemotherapy when possible versus systemic chemotherapy followed by resection of the primary tumor when necessary are compared in this systematic review.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seven studies reported series of patients with asymptomatic stage IV colorectal cancer and compared first-line chemotherapy with surgery for the primary tumor (n = 850 patients). Primary outcome measure was the complication rate related to the primary tumor in situ in patients receiving first-line systemic chemotherapy.

RESULTS

When leaving the primary tumor in situ, the mean complications were intestinal obstruction in 13.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.6% to 18.8%] and hemorrhage in only 3.0% (95% CI 0.95% to 6.0%) of the patients. After resection, the overall postoperative morbidity ranged from 18.8% to 47.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with stage IV colorectal cancer, resection of the asymptomatic primary tumor provides only minimal palliative benefit, can give rise to major morbidity and mortality and therefore potentially delays beneficial systemic chemotherapy. When presenting with asymptomatic disease, initial chemotherapy should be started and resection of the primary tumor should be reserved for the small portion of patients who develop major complications from the primary tumor.

Survival and symptomatic benefit from palliative primary tumor resection in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer have a limited life expectancy and are at risk for life-threatening tumor-related obstruction, perforation, and hemorrhage. Though surgical resection is performed frequently in this setting, its true benefit is not well-established.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the medical literature from 1996-2006 using the search terms metastatic colorectal cancer and primary resection to find studies that evaluated the management of primary tumors in metastatic colorectal cancer. All search results were included in our analysis and were assessed on the basis of methodologic quality.

RESULTS/FINDINGS

Twelve relevant studies were identified; ten were single-institution retrospective reviews and two were population-based studies using National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results database. No prospective or randomized studies were identified. Approximately 70% of patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer in the USA undergo primary tumor resection; only a minority have this done for tumor-related symptoms or as part of potentially curative resection. The postoperative mortality ranged from 9.0-11.2% in large cancer registries but was often lower in major cancer centers. Resection of asymptomatic primary tumors was frequently associated with prolonged survival but was not found to reduce significantly the incidence of life-threatening tumor-related complications.

INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSION

Retrospective data suggest that non-curative resection of asymptomatic colorectal primary tumors may prolong survival; however, selection bias and unaccounted clinical factors may explain this observation. Prospective, randomized surgical trials are needed to test the role of primary tumor resection in this setting, especially because of its current widespread use, and its associated cost, morbidity, and high postoperative mortality.

Palliative surgery for rectal cancer in a national cohort

OBJECTIVE

Whether resection of the primary tumour is of benefit to patients with incurable rectal cancer (RC) remains a matter of debate. In this study we analyse prospectively recorded data from a national cohort.

METHOD

Among 4831 patients diagnosed with RC between 1997 and 2001, 838 (17%) patients were treated with palliative surgery. Patients were stratified according to disease stage, age and type of surgery.

RESULTS

A significantly longer median survival, 12 (range 10-13) months, was observed in patients treated with resection of the primary tumour compared with 5 (range 4-6) months in patients treated with nonresective procedures (P < 0.001). Median survival in months was significantly (P < 0.001) related to age (13; < 60 years of age, 10; 60 to 69 years, 7; 70 to 79 years, 6; >/= 80 years of age). In patients over 80 years, survival was similar regardless of the treatment. Thirty-day mortality varied from 2.5% to 20%, according to age groups.

CONCLUSION

The longer survival observed in patients with resection of the primary tumour may partly be explained by patient selection. Elderly patients (>/= 80 years) had a similar survival, irrespective of resection of the primary tumour or not. Careful consideration of the individual patient, extent of disease and treatment-related factors are important in decision-taking for palliative treatment for patients with advanced RC.

Laparoscopic bowel resection in the setting of metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to review the outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal resection for patients with stage IV colorectal cancer.

METHODS

From the prospectively collected database for patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer in our institution, those with stage IV colorectal cancer who underwent elective resection of tumor during the period from January 2000 to June 2006 were included. The outcomes of those with laparoscopic resection were reviewed and comparison was made between patients with laparoscopic and open resection.

RESULTS

A total of 200 patients (127 men) with median age of 69 years (range: 25-91 years) were included, and 77 underwent laparoscopic resection. Conversion was required in ten patients (13.0%) and all except one conversion were due to fixed or bulky tumors. There was no operative mortality in the laparoscopic group. The complication rate was 14% and the median postoperative hospital stay was 7 days. When patients with laparoscopic resection were compared with those with open operations, there was no difference in age, gender, comorbidity, or tumor size between the two groups. However, the complication rate was significantly lower in those with laparoscopic resection (14% versus 32%, P = 0.007) and the median hospital stay was significantly shorter (7 days versus 8 days, P = 0.005). The operative mortalities and the survivals were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Colorectal resection can be performed safely in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer. The operative outcomes in terms of complication rate and hospital stay compare favorably with patients with open resection.

Multivariate analysis of predictive factors for early postoperative death after colorectal surgery in patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous unresectable liver metastases

PURPOSE

Surgery of the primary tumor in patients with colorectal cancer and unresectable synchronous liver metastases remains controversial. This study was designed to evaluate predictive preoperative factors of early postoperative death (<3 months) in such patients.

METHODS

This study included 80 patients who underwent colorectal resection (n = 56) or diversion stoma (n = 24) for colorectal cancer with unresectable liver metastases. Twenty-two patients (28 percent) died during the first three months after surgery with two (2.5 percent) in-hospital postoperative deaths. Analysis of predictive preoperative factors for three-month postoperative death risk was performed.

RESULTS

In univariate analysis, age older than 75 years (P = 0.01), American Society of Anesthesiologists grade > II (P = 0.009), symptomatic patient (P = 0.01), bowel obstruction (P = 0.03), aspartate aminotransferase serum level >50 (1.5 N) IU/L (P = 0.008), and alkaline phosphatase >200 (2 N) IU/L (P = 0.02) were prognostic risk factors for three-month death after surgery. In multivariate analysis, age older than 75 years (relative risk = 7.9; P = 0.04) and aspartate aminotransferase serum level >50 IU/L (relative risk = 8.3; P = 0.03) were independent risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous unresectable liver metastases, the three-month mortality rate was high (28 percent). Thus, better knowledge of risk factors could help select patients who could possibly benefit from surgery. The study suggested that age older than 75 years and liver cytolysis (>1.5 N) are associated with an increased three-month postoperative death risk. In these patients, surgery should be avoided.