Selective preservation of the anal transition zone in ileoanal pouch procedures

Stapled Anastomosis Versus Hand-Sewn Anastomosis With Mucosectomy for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Postoperative Outcomes, Functional Outcomes, and Oncological Safety

PURPOSE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare outcomes between stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and hand-sewn IPAA with mucosectomy in cases of ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis) guidelines 2020 and AMSTAR 2 (Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews) guidelines. We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs). Subgroup analysis was performed according to the indication for surgery.

RESULTS

The bibliographic research yielded 31 trials: 3 RCTs, 5 prospective clinical trials, and 24 CCTs including 8872 patients: 4871 patients in the stapled group and 4038 in the hand-sewn group. Regarding postoperative outcomes, the stapled group had a lower rate of anastomotic stricture, small bowel obstruction, and ileal pouch failure. There were no differences between the 2 groups in terms of operative time, anastomotic leak, pelvic sepsis, pouchitis, or hospital stay. For functional outcomes, the stapled group was associated with greater outcomes in terms of seepage per day and by night, pad use, night incontinence, resting pressure, and squeeze pressure. There were no differences in stool Frequency per 24h, stool frequency at night, antidiarrheal medication, sexual impotence, or length of the high-pressure zone. There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of dysplasia and neoplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to hand-sewn anastomosis, stapled ileoanal anastomosis leads to a large reduction in anastomotic stricture, small bowel obstruction, ileal pouch failure, seepage by day and night, pad use, and night incontinence. This may ensure a higher resting pressure and squeeze pressure in manometry evaluation.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

The protocol was registered at PROSPERO under CRD 42022379880.

The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland consensus guidelines in surgery for inflammatory bowel disease

AIM

There is a requirement of an expansive and up to date review of surgical management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that can dovetail with the medical guidelines produced by the British Society of Gastroenterology.

METHODS

Surgeons who are members of the ACPGBI with a recognised interest in IBD were invited to contribute various sections of the guidelines. They were directed to produce a procedure based document using literature searches that were systematic, comprehensible, transparent and reproducible. Levels of evidence were graded. An editorial board was convened to ensure consistency of style, presentation and quality. Each author was asked to provide a set of recommendations which were evidence based and unambiguous. These recommendations were submitted to the whole guideline group and scored. They were then refined and submitted to a second vote. Only those that achieved >80% consensus at level 5 (strongly agree) or level 4 (agree) after 2 votes were included in the guidelines.

RESULTS

All aspects of surgical care for IBD have been included along with 157 recommendations for management.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines provide an up to date and evidence based summary of the current surgical knowledge in the management of IBD and will serve as a useful practical text for clinicians performing this type of surgery.

Adenoma formation and malignancy after restorative proctocolectomy with or without mucosectomy in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis

BACKGROUND

There is controversy concerning whether or not to perform mucosectomy after IPAA in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Although more frequent adenoma formation at the anastomotic site in patients without a mucosectomy is documented, the interpretation of the theoretical reflections and empirical findings are ambiguous.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the differences in adenoma formation at the anastomotic site and in the ileal pouch among patients with familial adenomatous polyposis after IPAA with or without mucosectomy.

DESIGN

Data were gathered from The Norwegian Polyposis Registry and The Cancer Registry of Norway.

PATIENTS

Sixty-one patients with familial adenomatous polyposis who had IPAA were included in the Norwegian Polyposis Registry.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The frequency of adenoma development in the pouch or at the anastomotic site was measured.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients had a pelvic pouch performed with mucosectomy and 22 patients without. The observational time was 15.5 and 13.7 years. Adenoma formation at the anastomotic site was 4 in 39 and 14 in 22, and the estimated rate was 17% vs 75% (p = 0.0001). One patient without mucosectomy had a cancer (Dukes A) at the anastomotic site. There was no estimated long-term difference in adenoma formation in the ileal pouches between the 2 surgical procedures (38%) (p = 0.10).

LIMITATIONS

The study is retrospective, in part, and relies on data from registries. There is a limited number of cases, and selection bias because of surgeon preference may exist.

CONCLUSION

In patients with familial adenomatous polyposis who undergo IPAA, adenoma formation at the anastomotic site is significantly reduced after mucosectomy. Mucosectomy may be the preferable procedure to prevent adenomas at the anastomotic site.

History of and current issues affecting surgery for pediatric ulcerative colitis

Pediatric ulcerative colitis (UC) is reportedly more extensive and progressive in its clinical course than adult UC. Therefore, more aggressive initial therapies and more frequent colectomies are needed. When physicians treat pediatric UC, they must consider the therapeutic outcome as well as the child's physical and psychological development. Mucosal proctocolectomy with ileal J-pouch anal anastomosis is currently recommended as a standard curative surgical procedure for UC in both children and adults worldwide. This procedure was developed 100 years after the first surgical therapy, which treated UC by colon irrigation through a temporary inguinal colostomy. Predecessors in the colorectal and pediatric surgical fields have struggled against several postoperative complications and have long sought a surgical procedure that is optimal for children. We herein describe the history of the development of surgical procedures and the current issues regarding the surgical indications for pediatric UC. These issues differ from those in adults, including the definition of toxic megacolon on plain X-rays, the incidence of colon carcinoma, preoperative and postoperative steroid complications, and future growth. Surgeons treating children with UC should consider the historical experiences of pioneer surgeons to take the most appropriate next step to improve the surgical outcomes and patients' quality of life.

Functional outcome following restorative rectal cancer surgery

The trend towards preoperative adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies in selected patients with rectal cancer has led to increases in sphincter preservation with a limited understanding of the factors governing unsatisfactory functional outcomes. Data would suggest the need for a more selective use of standard radiotherapeutic fields in low- to intermediate-risk cases where there appears to be limited survival or locoregional recurrence benefit and where there is under-reported toxicity. This article discusses the complex factors which impact on functional outcome following open rectal cancer surgery particularly when it is accompanied by adjuvant therapy.

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: technical considerations

Total colectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis has emerged as the preferred surgical treatment for ulcerative colitis. The operation has evolved over the last few decades. Various technical issues are discussed, including types of reservoir, options for mesenteric lengthening, method and level of ileoanal anastomosis (hand-sewn versus stapled), and rationale for staging. Anticipated postoperative problems and strategies for management are discussed.

Should ileal pouch-anal anastomosis include mucosectomy?

OBJECTIVE

Debate exists as to the benefits of performing mucosectomy as part of pouch surgery for ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Whilst mucosectomy results in a more complete removal of diseased mucosa, this benefit may be at the price of poorer function. We examined these issues.

METHOD

Using Medline, Embase, Ovid and Cochrane database searches papers were identified relating to the outcome following pouch surgery with and without mucosectomy. Potential reasons for functional problems were investigated, as were rates of 'cuffitis', dysplasia, polyposis and cancer in the ileal pouch and anal canal.

RESULTS

The available evidence suggests that performing a mucosectomy leads to a worse functional outcome. Meta-analysis suggested that nighttime seepage of stool and resting and squeeze pressure were worse after mucosectomy. The most likely reason for functional impairment following pouch surgery was the degree of anal manipulation. Mucosectomy does seem to confer benefit in terms of disease control but this benefit does not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Stapled anastomosis avoiding mucosectomy is the approach of choice for ileal pouch anal anastomosis because this leads to superior functional outcome. Performing mucosectomy results in some clinical benefits in terms of lower rates of inflammation and dysplasia in the retained mucosa in UC patients and lower rates of cuff polyposis in FAP patients. However, on the basis of available evidence mucosectomy is only indicated in those cases where the patient is at a high risk of disease in the retained rectal cuff.

Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis revisited

Since restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with ileal-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) removes the entire diseased mucosa, it has become firmly established as the standard operative procedure of choice for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Many technical controversies still persist, such as mesenteric lengthening techniques, close rectal wall proctectomy, endoanal mucosectomy vs. double stapled anastomosis, loop ileostomy omission and a laparoscopic approach. Despite the complexity of the operation, IPAA is safe (mortality: 0.5-1%), it carries an acceptable risk of non-life-threatening complications (10-25%), and it achieves good long-term functional outcome with excellent patient satisfaction (over 95%). In contrast to the high incidence in patients operated for ulcerative colitis (UC) (15-20%), the occurrence of pouchitis after IPAA seems to be rare in FAP patients (0-11%). Even after IPAA, FAP patients are still at risk of developing adenomas (and occasional adenocarcinomas), either in the anal canal (10-31%) or in the ileal pouch itself (8-62%), thus requiring lifelong endoscopic monitoring. IPAA operation does not jeopardise pregnancy and childbirth, but it does impair female fecundity and has a low risk of impairment of erection and ejaculation in young males. The latter can almost completely be avoided by a careful "close rectal wall" proctectomy technique. Some argue that low risk patients (e.g. <5 rectal polyps) can be identified where ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) might be reasonable. We feel that the risk of rectal cancer after IRA means that IPAA should be recommended for the vast majority of FAP patients. We accept that in some very selected cases, based on clinical and genetics data (and perhaps influenced by patient choice regarding female fecundity), a stepwise surgical strategy with a primary IPA followed at a later age by a secondary proctectomy with IPAA could be proposed.

A comparison of hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy: a meta-analysis of 4183 patients

OBJECTIVE

Using meta-analytical techniques, the study compared postoperative adverse events and functional outcomes of stapled versus hand-sewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) following restorative proctocolectomy.

BACKGROUND

The choice of mucosectomy and hand-sewn versus stapled pouch-anal anastomosis has been a subject of debate with no clear consensus as to which method provides better functional results and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Comparative studies published between 1988 and 2003, of hand-sewn versus stapled IPAA were included. Endpoints were classified into postoperative complications and functional and physiologic outcomes measured at least 3 months following closure of ileostomy or surgery if no proximal diversion was used, quality of life following surgery, and neoplastic transformation within the anal transition zone.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies, consisting of 4183 patients (2699 hand-sewn and 1484 stapled IPAA) were included. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the 2 groups. The incidence of nocturnal seepage and pad usage favored the stapled IPAA (odds ratio [OR] = 2.78, P < 0.001 and OR = 4.12, P = 0.007, respectively). The frequency of defecation was not significantly different between the 2 groups (P = 0.562), nor was the use of antidiarrheal medication (OR = 1.27, P = 0.422). Anorectal physiologic measurements demonstrated a significant reduction in the resting and squeeze pressure in the hand-sewn IPAA group by 13.4 and 14.4 mm Hg, respectively (P < 0.018). The stapled IPAA group showed a higher incidence of dysplasia in the anal transition zone that did not reach statistical significance (OR = 0.42, P = 0.080).

CONCLUSIONS

Both techniques had similar early postoperative outcomes; however, stapled IPAA offered improved nocturnal continence, which was reflected in higher anorectal physiologic measurements. A risk of increased incidence of dysplasia in the ATZ may exist in the stapled group that cannot be quantified by this study. We describe a decision algorithm for the choice of IPAA, based on the relative risk of long-term neoplastic transformation.

A study of the complications and pelvic visceral function after restorative proctocolectomy and W pouch construction

OBJECTIVE

Aspects of ileal pouch surgery remain controversial. The authors' single practice experience of 107 operations illustrates many of them. It was hoped that its study would contribute usefully to the debate.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Details of all 107 restorative proctocolectomies carried out since the operation was started in Gloucester in 1984 until the study period ended have been kept prospectively. All patients had proctectomy by mesorectal dissection, and 106 had W pouch restoration. Four suffered functional failure requiring reversion to ileostomy and three patients have died. The remaining 99 were sent a questionnaire concerning pelvic visceral function and evidence of pouchitis. Records of all but one of the patients have been reviewed.

RESULTS

Surgical morbidity was low with neither chronic pelvic sepsis, pouch related fistula, pouch haemorrhage nor pouch ischaemia. Mucosectomised patients had similar bowel control to the stapled group. The policy change from routine to selective protective ileostomy proved satisfactory. W pouch function was found to be comparable to that reported from major J pouch series, although anti-diarrhoeal usage was reduced, and was not influenced by either gender, age or time since surgery.

CONCLUSION

None of the following reasonably intuitive assumptions seem supported by our findings: that mesorectal excision necessarily poses a greater danger to pelvic visceral function than close rectal dissection, that the greater capacity of W pouches will be reflected in markedly less frequency, that mucosectomy would impair anal control, or that a defunctioning ileostomy is a mandatory precaution. Pouch frequency is less if wind can be passed separately; otherwise functional outcome seems determined by other, non-technical, factors.

Double stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis (DS-IPAA) for mucosal ulcerative colitis (MUC): is there a correlation between the tissue type in the circular stapler donuts and in follow-up biopsy?

PURPOSE

This study aims to assess the correlation between the tissue types found in the circular stapler donut at the time of initial double-stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (DS-IPAA) and during subsequent periodic routine random biopsy. Secondarily, we sought to assess the risk of dysplasia, carcinoma or mucosal ulcerative colitis (MUC) recurrence in the retained mucosa.

METHODS

The pathology reports of 91 patients (48 males, 43 females) who were operated upon for MUC from September 1988 to June 1997 and were reviewed and had two follow up visits for biopsy. The histological features of the distal donuts and biopsies of retained mucosa obtained at yearly interval follow-up were assessed in order to determine the epithelial tissue type (columnar, transitional and squamous), inflammation, recurrence of MUC and presence of dysplasia or malignancy.

RESULTS

Median age at surgery was 43 (range 15-71) years and duration of MUC was 9.6 (range 0.3-42) years prior to surgery. The anastomosis was performed at a median height of 1.0 (range 0-2.5) cm cephalad to the dentate line and biopsy follow-up was undertaken at median 34 (range 2-110) months after DS-IPAA. The distal donuts were analysed in all cases, as were 305 follow-up biopsies (median 3.4; range 1-7 per patient). Although columnar epithelium (CE) was found in 62 (68%) donuts, it was absent on follow-up biopsy in 16 (26%) of these patients. Conversely, although no CE was identified in 29 (32%) donuts, it was identified in 11 (38%) of these patients during follow-up biopsy. CE in the donut was a significant predictor of CE in subsequent biopsies (P = 0.0012). The histological features consistent with MUC were seen in the biopsies from the retained mucosa in 15 (16%) patients from 0.3 to 7.6 years after DS-IPAA. While eight (9%) patients exhibited dysplasia or adenocarcinoma in the excised colon or rectum, none of the patients had either dysplastic changes or carcinoma within the retained mucosal biopsies.

CONCLUSION

The correlation between CE in the circular stapler donut and at follow-up biopsy was high. However since CE developed in some patients in whom no CE was present in the distal donuts, regardless of the epithelial tissue type finding at the time of DS-IPAA, periodic follow-up biopsy should be obtained.

Current controversies in pouch surgery

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis has become the most commonly used procedure for elective treatment of patients with mucosal ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Since its original description, the procedure has been modified in an attempt to obtain optimal functional results with low morbidity and mortality, and yet provide a cure for the disease. These modifications of the technique are discussed in this review, limited to the current points of controversy. We reviewed the current literature describing restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis. The current "hot topics" for debate are transanal mucosectomy with hand-sewn anastomosis versus the double-stapled technique, the use of diverting ileostomy, indeterminate colitis, the role of laparoscopy, and indications for pouch surgery in the elderly. Longer follow-up of patients and increased knowledge and experience with pouch surgery, coupled with active prospective evaluation of the procedure are required to settle these issues. Patients must be fully informed to understand inherent risks of each choice.

Risk factors for ileoanal J pouch-related septic complications in ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the association between pre- and perioperative factors and pouch-related septic complications (PRSC) in ulcerative colitis (UC) and in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

For patients with UC and FAP, IPAA is the surgical therapy of choice, but in some patients the outcome is compromised by PRSC.

METHODS

A total of 706 consecutive patients (494 UC, 212 FAP) were assessed in a study aimed at identifying subgroups of patients who were at high risk for PRSC. The rate of PRSC was analyzed as a time-dependent function (Kaplan-Meier estimation). Patients with UC and FAP were stratified separately according to associated factors (age, sex, surgeon's experience, temporary ileostomy, colectomy before IPAA, anastomotic tension, and several factors specific for UC).

RESULTS

In all, 131 (19.2%) patients had PRSC (23.4% UC, 9.4% FAP). In patients with UC, the estimated 1-year PRSC rate was 15.6% and the estimated 3-year PRSC rate was 24.2%. In patients with FAP, the estimated 1-year and 3-year PRSC rates were 9.2%. The difference between the estimated rates of PRSC was significant (P <.001). In the univariate analysis, patients with UC younger than 50 years, with severe proctitis, with preoperative hemoglobin levels less than 10 g/L, or receiving corticoid medication had a significantly higher risk for PRSC (P =.039, P =.037, P =.047, P =.003, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that patients with UC receiving a systemic prednisolone-equivalent corticoid medication of more than 40 mg/day had a significantly greater risk of developing pouch-related complications than patients with UC receiving 1 to 40 mg/day and patients with UC who were not receiving corticoid medication (RR: 3.78, 2.25, 1, respectively, P <.001). Patients with FAP proved to have a significantly higher risk for PRSC in the univariate and multivariate analyses if anastomotic tension had occurred (RR 3.60, P =.0086).

CONCLUSIONS

Pouch-related septic complications occur as late complications and should therefore be considered in regular, specific long-term follow-up examinations. The authors identified significant risk factors for PRSC specific to patients with UC and FAP; these must be considered for each individual surgical strategy.

Functional outcomes in patients with mucosal ulcerative colitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis by the double stapling technique: is there a relation to tissue type?

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate any differences in functional outcome in patients with mucosal ulcerative colitis after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with use of the double stapling technique relative to the type of tissue in the stapled doughnut.

METHODS

Between September 1988 and June 1997, the pathology of all patients with mucosal ulcerative colitis who underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with use of the double stapling technique were reviewed. Information was obtained regarding the tissue types in the distal tissue rings (doughnuts) obtained from the stapled ileal pouchanal anastomosis. The level of anastomosis was classified according to the type of tissue in the distal doughnut: Group I- patients in whom the anal transitional zone was removed and the distal doughnut included squamous epithelium or transitional epithelium and Group II- patients in whom the anal transitional zone was preserved because the distal doughnut revealed only columnar epithelium. Functional outcomes were assessed and compared by detailed questionnaires mailed to all patients at least one year after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery.

RESULTS

Distal doughnuts were obtained from the stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in 222 patients with mucosal ulcerative colitis. Follow-up data at a mean of 38 (range, 12-132) months were obtained in 138 (62.2 percent) patients, including 72 males, with a mean age of 46.9 (range, 13-79) years. Group I consisted of 40 patients (29 percent; 35 (25.4 percent) who had squamous epithelium and 5 (3.6 percent) who had transitional epithelium in the distal tissue rings). Group II consisted of 98 patients (71 percent) with columnar epithelium in the distal tissue rings. Age at diagnosis and operation, duration of disease, length of follow-up, and stage of pouch surgery were similar in the two groups. Incontinence scores, frequency of bowel movement, use of a protective pad, discrimination between gas and stool, use of antidiarrheals, life-style alteration, and patient satisfaction showed similar functional results between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The tissue type in the stapler distal doughnut did not greatly influence functional outcome. Failure to identify a relationship may attest to the variable height and composition of the anal transitional zone.

Aneuploidy and columnar cuff surveillance after stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis

PURPOSE

A stapled pouch-anal anastomosis without mucosectomy is widely used in restorative proctocolectomy. Uncertainty exists about the longer-term outcome of retaining a columnar cuff of epithelium in the anal canal and about the need for surveillance of the columnar cuff. The aim of this article was to assess the ability to obtain biopsies of the columnar cuff, to assess the risk of dysplasia, and to search for the presence of aneuploidy as an early of marker of dysplasia in nondysplastic epithelium.

METHOD

A total of 457 biopsy specimens were taken during 203 examinations of 113 patients. All biopsy specimens were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and examined by microscopy. One hundred thirty-two of these biopsy specimens from 67 patients were frozen and analyzed by flow cytometry for aneuploidy.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up after pouch formation was 2.5 years, and the time after diagnosis of ulcerative colitis was 10.1 years. Successful columnar cuff biopsies were done on 93 percent of patients. There was no dysplasia. Two biopsy specimens from one patient had aneuploidy.

CONCLUSION

To date, neoplastic change in the columnar cuff is rare. A selective policy of surveillance biopsies is recommended that includes patients greater than ten years after the diagnosis of ulcerative colitis and patients with dysplasia or cancer in their proctocolectomy specimen, but long-term follow-up data are needed.

The physiology of ileo-anal pouch function

Even excellent clinical function after ileo-anal pouch construction is associated with a variety of physiological abnormalities. Small bowel intestinal motility is essentially normal but the ileal reservoir serves to markedly suppress the ileal motor response both to progressive distension by intestinal contents and to transmitted myoelectrical complexes. As a result, the healthy pouch can accommodate a large volume of intestinal content before the rising baseline pressure and the appearance of large isolated contraction waves produce an urge to defecate. Evacuation in the normal pouch patient is rapid and highly efficient and is achieved by means of the Valsalva maneuver without any evidence of significant intestinal propulsion. External anal sphincter function is fully preserved but internal anal sphincter function is significantly impaired in the immediate postoperative period. Recovery occurs over the next 6 to 12 months but is often incomplete. Bacterial overgrowth in the pouch and prepouch ileum is almost universal and results in the premature deconjugation of primary bile salts and accumulation of secondary bile salts within the pouch. These produce morphologic changes in the ileal mucosa, and their excretion in pouch effluent gradually depletes the bile salt pool. Anerobic organisms also bind with vitamin B12 and the vitamin B12-intrinsic factor complex, resulting in subtle but measurable reductions in vitamin B12 levels in pouch patients. Finally, anerobic fermentation of mucus and undigested carbohydrate results in excessive quantities of short chain fatty acids within the pouch lumen. The clinical significance of these substances is unclear, but they may have an adverse action on both ileal mucosal and smooth muscle function. In essence, however, the pouch surgeon can maximize the likelihood of good clinical function by constructing a large capacity pouch, by avoiding surgery in patients with clearly deficient anal sphincter mechanisms, and by careful attention to pouch-anal anastomotic technique.