Effect of systemic steroids on ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis

NSQIP 5-factor modified frailty index and complications after ileal anal pouch anastomosis for ulcerative colitis

Background

Frailty has been associated with worse postoperative outcomes. The 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) is an objective measure although its validity in measuring frailty in patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for chronic ulcerative colitis (CUC) has not been reported.

Methods

This study used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) targeted proctectomy database. The mFI-5 was calculated by five preoperative diagnoses: insulin-dependent or noninsulin-dependent diabetes, congestive heart failure, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and dependent or partially dependent functional status. The impact of mFI-5 on minor and major postoperative morbidity in CUC patients undergoing IPAA was analyzed.

Results

The cohort included 1454 patients (median age 38 years, median body mass index [BMI] 26 kg/m2) of which 87 % had a mFI-5 = 0, 11 % had a mFI-5 = 1, and 2.5 % a mFI-5 ≥ 2. In multivariable logistic regression, mFI-5 ≥ 2 was significantly associated with minor complications (OR = 2.29, 95 % CI [1.00-5.22], p = 0.049), but not with major complications (p = 0.860).

Conclusion

IPAA for CUC is associated with high postoperative morbidity, however, the mFI-5 alone has limited utility in determining which patients are at a higher risk of complications due to frailty. These observations suggest there is a need for more relevant instruments to measure frailty in this patient cohort.

Acute abdomen in the immunocompromised patient: WSES, SIS-E, WSIS, AAST, and GAIS guidelines

Immunocompromised patients are a heterogeneous and diffuse category frequently presenting to the emergency department with acute surgical diseases. Diagnosis and treatment in immunocompromised patients are often complex and must be multidisciplinary. Misdiagnosis of an acute surgical disease may be followed by increased morbidity and mortality. Delayed diagnosis and treatment of surgical disease occur; these patients may seek medical assistance late because their symptoms are often ambiguous. Also, they develop unique surgical problems that do not affect the general population. Management of this population must be multidisciplinary.This paper presents the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), Surgical Infection Society Europe (SIS-E), World Surgical Infection Society (WSIS), American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST), and Global Alliance for Infection in Surgery (GAIS) joined guidelines about the management of acute abdomen in immunocompromised patients.

Staged Approaches to Restorative Proctocolectomy with Ileoanal Pouch-When and Why?

Restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with ileal pouch anal-anastomosis (IPAA) is commonly performed for patients with ulcerative colitis, familial adenomatous polyposis, and selected phenotypes of Crohn's disease (CD). Due to concerns about the effects of surgical complications on pouch functional outcomes, debate remains surrounding when and whether RPC with IPAA should be performed in a staged manner. Particularly debated are the timings of the IPAA, whether it is constructed at time of the proctocolectomy and whether to utilize temporary fecal diversion with a loop ileostomy. RPC with IPAA can be performed in one, two, or three stages, with each stage typically separated by 3-6 months. Proponents of a staged approach argue that poor pouch function, which is often a result of IPAA complications, including leak and infection, can be difficult to overcome and mandate additional, major surgeries, and that staging pouch creation and pairing with a protective ileostomy reduce those complications. However, subjecting patients to multiple surgeries and prolonging their time with an ileostomy present unique risks as well. Surgeons' experience and preference and patient characteristics need to be considered when determining operative planning. Highly selected patients with CD can be considered for RPC with IPAA, although with an acknowledgment of inherently higher pouch failure rates. Understanding the short- and long-term consequences of RPC with IPAA construction can help surgeons determine the appropriate approach.

Risk of Postoperative Infectious Complications From Medical Therapies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) medications on postoperative infection risk within 30 days of surgery.

METHODS

We searched multiple electronic databases and reference lists of articles dating up to August 2018 for prospective and retrospective studies comparing postoperative infection risk in patients treated with an IBD medication perioperatively with the risk in patients who were not taking that medication. Outcomes were overall infectious complications and intra-abdominal infections within 30 days of surgery.

RESULTS

Sixty-three studies were included. Overall infectious complications were increased in patients who received anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents (odds ratio [OR] 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.50) and corticosteroids (OR 1.34; 95% CI, 1.25-1.44) and decreased in those who received 5-aminosalicylic acid (OR 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46-0.87). No difference was observed in those treated with immunomodulators (OR 1.08; 95% CI, 0.94-1.25) or anti-integrin agents (OR 1.06; 95% CI, 0.67-1.69). Both corticosteroids and anti-TNF agents were associated with increased intra-abdominal infection risk (OR 1.63; 95% CI, 1.33-2.00 and OR 1.46; 95% CI, 1.08-1.97, respectively), whereas no impact was observed with 5-aminosalicylates, immunomodulators, or anti-integrin therapy. Twenty-two studies had low risk of bias while the remaining studies had very high risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Corticosteroids and anti-TNF agents were associated with increased overall postoperative infection risk as well as intra-abdominal infection in IBD patients, whereas no increased risk was observed for immunomodulators or anti-integrin therapy. Although these results may result from residual confounding rather than from a true biological effect, prospective studies that control for potential confounding factors are required to generate higher-quality evidence.

Risk of postoperative infectious complications from medical therapies in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Medications used to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have significantly improved patient outcomes and delayed time to surgery. However, some of these therapies are recognized to increase the general risk of infection and have an unclear impact on postoperative infection risk.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the impact of perioperative IBD medications on the risk of postoperative infections within 30 days of surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane IBD Group's Specialized Register (29 October 2019), MEDLINE (January 1966 to October 2019), Embase (January 1985 to October 2019), the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception up to October 2019, and reference lists of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials, quasi-randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, retrospective cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional studies comparing participants treated with an IBD medication preoperatively or within 30 days postoperatively to those who were not taking that medication (either another active medication, placebo, or no treatment). We included published study reports and abstracts.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts and extracted data. The primary outcome was postoperative infection within 30 days of surgery. Secondary outcomes included incisional infections and wound dehiscence, intra-abdominal infectious complications and extra-abdominal infections. Three review authors assessed risks of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We contacted authors for additional information when data were missing. For the primary and secondary outcomes, we calculated odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) using the generic inverse variance method. When applicable, we analyzed adjusted and unadjusted data separately. We evaluated the certainty of the evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 68 observational cohort studies (total number of participants unknown because some studies did not report the number of participants). Of these, 48 studies reported including participants with Crohn's disease, 36 reported including participants with ulcerative colitis and five reported including participants with indeterminate colitis. All 42 studies that reported urgency of surgery included elective surgeries, with 31 (74%) of those also including emergency surgeries. Twenty-four studies had low risk of bias while the rest had very high risk. Based on pooling of adjusted data, we calculated ORs for postoperative total infection rates in participants who received corticosteroids (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.09; low-certainty evidence), immunomodulators (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.76; low-certainty evidence), anti-TNF agents (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.13; very low-certainty evidence) and anti-integrin agents (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.36; low-certainty evidence). We pooled unadjusted data to assess postoperative total infection rates for the use of aminosalicylates (5-ASA) (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.14; very low-certainty evidence). One secondary outcome examined was wound-related complications in participants using: corticosteroids (OR 1.41, 95% CI 0.72 to 2.74; very low-certainty evidence), immunomodulators (OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.89; very low-certainty evidence), anti-TNF agents (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.68; very low-certainty evidence) and anti-integrin agents (OR 1.64, 95% CI 0.77 to 3.50; very low-certainty evidence) compared to controls. Another secondary outcome examined the odds of postoperative intra-abdominal infections in participants using: corticosteroids (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.84; very low-certainty evidence), 5-ASA (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.33; very low-certainty evidence), immunomodulators (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.12; very low-certainty evidence), anti-TNF agents (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.82; very low-certainty evidence) and anti-integrin agents (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.20; very low-certainty evidence) compared to controls. Lastly we checked the odds for extra-abdominal infections in participants using: corticosteroids (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.55; very low-certainty evidence), immunomodulators (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.71; very low-certainty evidence), anti-TNF agents (OR 1.34, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.87; very low-certainty evidence) and anti-integrin agents (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.43 to 3.08; very low-certainty evidence) compared to controls.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence for corticosteroids, 5-ASA, immunomodulators, anti-TNF medications and anti-integrin medications was of low or very low certainty. The impact of these medications on postoperative infectious complications is uncertain and we can draw no firm conclusions about their safety in the perioperative period. Decisions on preoperative IBD medications should be tailored to each person's unique circumstances. Future studies should focus on controlling for potential confounding factors to generate higher-quality evidence.

Diverted versus undiverted restorative proctocolectomy for chronic ulcerative colitis: an analysis of long-term outcomes after pouch leak short title: outcomes after pouch leak

BACKGROUND

The safety of undiverted restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) is debated. This study compares long-term outcomes after pouch leak in diverted and undiverted RPC patients.

METHODS

Data were obtained from a prospectively maintained registry from a single surgical practice. One-stage and staged procedures with an undiverted pouch were considered undiverted pouches; all others were considered diverted pouches. The outcomes measured were pouch excision and long-term diversion defined as the need for loop ileostomy at 200 weeks after pouch creation. Regression models were used to compare outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 317 diverted and 670 undiverted pouches, of which 378 were one-stage procedures. Pouch leaks occurred in 135 patients, 92 (13.7%) after undiverted, and 43 (13.6%) after diverted pouches. Eighty-six (64%) leaks were diagnosed within 6 months of pouch creation. Undiverted patients underwent more emergent procedures within 30 days of pouch creation (p < 0.01). Pouch excision occurred in 14 (33%) diverted patients and 13 (14%) undiverted patients (p = 0.01). Thirteen (32%) diverted patients and 18 (21%) undiverted patients (p = 0.17) had ileostomies at 200 weeks after surgery. In multivariable analyses, diverted patients had a higher risk of pouch excision (HR 3.67 p < 0.01), but similar rates of ileostomy at 200 weeks (HR 1.8, p = 0.19) compared to undiverted patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a likely selection bias in which "healthier" patients undergo an undiverted pouch, our data suggest that diversion does not prevent pouch excision and the need for long-term diversion after pouch leak. These findings suggest that undiverted RPC is a safe procedure in appropriately selected patients.

Total abdominal colectomy vs. restorative total proctocolectomy as the initial approach to medically refractory ulcerative colitis

PURPOSE

There is scant data assessing the consequences of staging restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. The aim of the study is to compare outcomes of initial vs. staged restorative proctocolectomy.

METHODS

Patients completing restorative proctocolectomy, including ileostomy reversal, during 2006-2012 were identified from an IRB-approved database. Demographics, treatment variables, and perioperative outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Out of 521 patients, 322 (62%) underwent initial total abdominal colectomy before restorative proctectomy. This group was associated with more common preoperative anemia, leukocytosis, hypoalbuminemia, severe colitis, steroids and biologics use, decreased proximal ileostomy rate at the time of completion restorative proctectomy (92.5 vs 97.5%, p = 0.023), shorter hospital stay (6.6 vs 7.8, p < 0.001), and marginally decreased pelvic sepsis rate (6.2 vs 11.1%, p = 0.05) compared with patients having initial restorative proctocolectomy. However, they also required longer combined postoperative hospital stays (17 vs 12 days, p < 0.001) and treatment span (10.4 vs 5.7 months, p < 0.001) to complete all surgical stages and they were associated with increased overall postoperative surgical site infection, hemorrhage, and small bowel obstruction rates. Pouch function and QOL were comparable between the groups, except for increased nightly bowel movements in the initial abdominal colectomy group (2.5 ± 2.2 vs 2.1 ± 1.8, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing initial total abdominal colectomy require longer treatment time and experience increased overall morbidity, but ultimately experience comparable ileal pouch outcomes when compared to patients undergoing initial restorative proctocolectomy.

The Role of Temporary Fecal Diversion

The use of temporary fecal diversion is of great importance to tenuous anastomosis, immunosuppressed patient, or actively infected patient. Its use protects newly constructed intestinal anastomoses from being the culprit of pelvic sepsis or systemic illness. Thus, potential morbidity and mortality can be averted. However, its appropriate or optimal use is often debated. We herein discuss the evidence for when to best use a diverting stoma for colorectal, coloanal, and ileoanal anastomoses. We also discuss the importance of considering a temporary diverting stoma in the setting of high-dose immunosuppression (e.g., transplant patients or inflammatory bowel disease), active infection, or upon creation of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Lastly, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of a loop ileostomy versus colostomy for temporary diversion of fecal contents.

Impact of preoperative steroid or immunosuppressant use on short-term outcomes following colectomy in Crohn's disease patients

BACKGROUND

Evaluating the impact of steroid or immunosuppressants (SI) therapy prior to colectomy in Crohn's disease (CD) patients on postoperative septic and colectomy-specific outcomes using the American College of Surgeons (ACS)-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP)-targeted colectomy database.

METHODS

All CD patients undergoing colectomy were retrieved from the 2012-2013 NSQIP-targeted database. Thirty-day postoperative outcomes were compared for patients who were on steroids or immunosuppressants (SI) within the 30 days prior to colectomy to the others using univariable and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

Of 2208 CD patients, 1387 (63%) were on SI. Patients in the SI group were younger, and a greater proportion underwent laparoscopic surgery (p < 0.05). SI use was associated with a higher rate of sepsis (7.6 vs. 5.2%), anastomotic leak (5.6 vs. 3.5%), and return to operating room (6.8 vs. 3.3%). On multivariable analysis, SI was associated with sepsis, septic shock, and anastomotic leak [odds ratio = 1.58, 95% confidence interval 1.09-2.27].

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that SI use within 30 days of colectomy is associated with a higher rate of sepsis and septic shock and anastomotic leak in CD patients. Withholding SI prior to surgery, or the selective use of an ostomy to mitigate the consequences of a leak and hence sepsis need due consideration prior to surgery.

Perioperative Glucocorticoid Administration Improves Elbow Motion in Terrible Triad Injuries

PURPOSE

Among patients who undergo surgical treatment of terrible triad elbow injuries (TTEI), we hypothesized that those who received perioperative glucocorticoid (GC) therapy would have improved postoperative pain and range of motion (ROM) and a similar complication rate compared with patients who did not receive GC therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 26 patients who underwent surgical treatment of TTEI from 2009 to 2015. Thirteen patients received a single intraoperative dose of 10 mg intravenous dexamethasone followed with a 6-day oral methylprednisolone taper course (GC group), and 13 did not (control group). After surgery, patients were placed in an orthosis at 90° flexion with the forearm in pronation for 2 weeks, after which ROM was initiated. Patients were seen in clinic at 2, 6, 12, and 24 weeks after surgery, at which time numeric pain scale scores and ROM data were collected and any complications were noted.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, the GC group had a greater flexion-extension arc of motion at 24 weeks (132.5° vs 105.5°); significant differences were not found at earlier time points. Supination measurements were significantly greater for the GC group at every time point with a difference at final follow-up of 23.2° (61.0° vs. 84.2°). There were 5 complications in the control group (35.8%), 3 of which required additional surgery, and 3 complications in the GC group (23.1%), 1 of which required another surgery. No postoperative infections were found in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative glucocorticoid administration is associated with improved ROM after surgical treatment of TTEI. Flexion-extension, pronosupination arc of motion, and overall supination were significantly improved. Postoperative pain scores and complication rates were similar between GC and control groups.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Patient optimization for surgery relating to Crohn's disease

The majority of patients with Crohn's disease require abdominal surgery during their lifetime, some of whom will require multiple operations. Postoperative complications are seen more frequently in patients requiring abdominal surgery for Crohn's disease than in patients requiring abdominal surgery for other conditions. In this article, we review the evidence supporting preoperative optimization, discussing strategies that potentially improve surgical outcomes and reduce perioperative morbidity and mortality. We discuss the roles of adequate cross-sectional imaging, nutritional optimization, appropriate adjustments of medical therapy, management of preoperative abscesses and phlegmons, smoking cessation and thromboembolic prophylaxis. We also review operation-related factors, and discuss their potential implications with respect to postoperative complications. Overall, the literature suggests that preoperative management has a major effect on postoperative outcomes.

Early and late surgical outcomes of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis within a defined population in Sweden

OBJECTIVE

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), has become the procedure of choice in patients requiring reconstructive surgery for ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis. The aim of this population-based study was to present data prospectively registered and retrospectively evaluated on the short-term and the long-term results of 124 consecutive IPAA performed chronologically by three surgeons in a single referral centre.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients who underwent IPAA from 1993 to 2012 were included. Early and late morbidity and mortality were evaluated.

RESULTS

Early complications were observed in 25 patients. There was one death from cardiac failure, high output stoma occurred in six patients and wound infection occurred in four patients. Complications were associated with higher BMI (P=0.032). Four patients had to be reoperated. Peroperative bleeding was reduced when using an ultrasonically activated scalpel for the perimuscular dissection (P<0.00001). Clavien-Dindo grade III-V affected five patients. Only one patient developed anastomotic leak and septic complications.Late complications occurred in 61 patients. There was no procedure-related mortality. Pouchitis was the most common complication (n=37). Primary sclerosing cholangitis and age younger than 40 years were associated significantly with a three- and two-fold increased risk of pouchitis, respectively. Small bowel obstruction was the second most common complication (n=16), more common in women (P=0.031). The pouch failure rate was low: 2.4%. Clavien-Dindo grade III-V affected 13 patients.

CONCLUSION

In the hands of experienced high-volume surgeons, IPAA is a safe procedure associated with a relatively low early morbidity as well as an acceptable late morbidity.

Morbidity and Risk Factors of Laparoscopic-Assisted Ileostomies in Children With Ulcerative Colitis

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic-assisted ileostomy (LAI) represents a cornerstone for the staged approach to ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim is to determine stoma morbidity in a series of pediatric patients and possibly identify specific risk factors.

METHODS

All of the patients who underwent LAI for UC between January 2008 and December 2014 were included. The following data were collected: patient demographics, preoperative medical treatment, body mass index (BMI) at surgery, Pediatric UC Index (PUCAI), and stoma-related complications. In this series of patients, a staged approach has been adopted (subtotal colectomy + ileostomy; restorative proctocolectomy with J-pouch ileo-rectal anastomosis + ileostomy; ileostomy closure).

RESULTS

Seventy-two LAIs were fashioned in 37 pediatric patients with UC. Median age at surgery was 12 years (range 5-14.8 years). Boy to girl ratio was 0.85:1. Mortality was zero. Complications occurred after 8 procedures after a median of 31 days postoperatively (range 8-60 days). Those were significantly more frequent in the case of BMI-z score >-0.51 (deleted in revised manuscript, ie, relatively overweight patients) and in the case of preoperative azathioprine administration. Pediatric UC Index score, sex, number of preoperative medications, and other preoperative parameters did not correlate with the incidence of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests to keep a prudent behavior in the case of patients with a BMI-z score >-0.51 and received preoperative azathioprine administration. Parents should be adequately acknowledged on this regard.

A primer on wound healing in colorectal surgery in the age of bioprosthetic materials

Wound healing is a complex, dynamic process that is vital for closure of cutaneous injuries, restoration of abdominal wall integrity after laparotomy closure, and to prevent anastomotic dehiscence after bowel surgery. Derangements in healing have been described in multiple processes including diabetes mellitus, corticosteroid use, irradiation for malignancy, and inflammatory bowel disease. A thorough understanding of the process of healing is necessary for clinical decision making and knowledge of the current state of the science may lead future researchers in developing methods to enable our ability to modulate healing, ultimately improving outcomes. An exciting example of this ability is the use of bioprosthetic materials used for abdominal wall surgery (hernia repair/reconstruction). These bioprosthetic meshes are able to regenerate and remodel from an allograft or xenograft collagen matrix into site-specific tissue; ultimately being degraded and minimizing the risk of long-term complications seen with synthetic materials. The purpose of this article is to review healing as it relates to cutaneous and intestinal trauma and surgery, factors that impact wound healing, and wound healing as it pertains to bioprosthetic materials.

The impact of preoperative steroid use on short-term outcomes following surgery for inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are frequently treated with steroids prior to surgery. We characterized the association between preoperative steroid use and postoperative complications in a large prospective cohort.

METHODS

We identified patients who underwent major IBD-related abdominal surgery in the American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) between 2005 and 2012. We compared the risk of postoperative complications and 30-day mortality between preoperative steroid users and non-users.

RESULTS

We identified 8260 Crohn's disease (CD) and 7235 ulcerative colitis (UC) patients who underwent major abdominal surgery. Preoperative steroid use was associated with higher risk of postoperative complications, excluding death, in both CD (22.6% vs. 18.5%, P<0.0001) and UC (30.1% vs. 22.5%, P<0.0001). The adjusted odds ratio for any postoperative complication associated with steroids was 1.26 (95% CI: 1.12-1.41) for CD and 1.44 (95% CI: 1.28-1.61) for UC. Infectious complications were more frequent with steroid use in both CD (15.2% vs. 12.9%, P=0.004) and UC (19.4% vs. 15.6%, P<0.0001), specifically intra-abdominal infections and sepsis. Steroid use was associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in both CD (OR, 1.66; 95% CI: 1.17-2.35) and UC (OR, 2.66; 95% CI: 2.01-3.53). 30-day mortality did not differ among steroid users and non-users (6.8/1000 vs. 5.8/1000, P=0.58 for CD; 13.5/1000 vs. 15.2/1000, P=0.55 for UC).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative steroids are associated with higher risk of postoperative sepsis and VTE in IBD. Increased infectious control measures and VTE prophylaxis may reduce adverse events.

Treatment with corticosteroids and the risk of anastomotic leakage following lower gastrointestinal surgery: a literature survey

AIM

Background Anastomotic leakage is a serious complication in colorectal surgery. Treatment with corticosteroids is known to impair wound healing but their effect on the healing of a colorectal anastomosis remains unclear, and studies have reported conflicting results. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the current evidence regarding the effect of corticosteroids on the risk of anastomotic leakage following colorectal surgery.

METHOD

Search strategy A systematic review was conducted following a search of PubMed and Embase. Selection criteria Inclusion criteria were studies published in English and involving humans. A minimum cohort of 50 patients was required and anastomoses involving the ileum, colon and rectum were included. Studies that investigated corticosteroids as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage were included regardless of the duration and the dose of corticosteroids. Data Collection and analysis A comparison was conducted between anastomotic leakage in noncorticosteroid- and corticosteroid-treated patients. The main outcome measure was the risk of anastomotic leakage.

RESULTS

Twelve studies with a total of 9564 patients were included in the review. In total, 1034 patients received corticosteroids in the preoperative period, and 344 patients were diagnosed with anastomotic leakage, 70 of whom had received corticosteroids. Six of the 12 studies showed an increased risk for anastomotic leakage in the corticosteroid group. Overall, the anastomotic leakage rate was 6.77% (95% CI: 5.48-9.06) in the corticosteroid group and 3.26% (95% CI: 2.94-3.58) in the noncorticosteroid group.

CONCLUSION

Caution should be shown in patients scheduled for lower gastrointestinal surgery with anastomosis.

Impact of stress dose steroids on the outcomes of restorative proctocolectomy in patients with ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Stress dose steroids are administered during the perioperative period to prevent complications of secondary hypoadrenalism, which can occur after long-term steroid treatment. Steroids also increase postoperative morbidity. Patients with ulcerative colitis often require steroid therapy before definitive surgery and often receive perioperative steroids in a variety of doses.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of stress dose steroid administration on short-term postoperative outcomes after restorative proctocolectomy in patients with ulcerative colitis.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

The investigation took place in a high-volume, specialized colorectal surgery department.

PATIENTS

Patients who had been treated with steroids for ulcerative colitis and underwent a restorative proctocolectomy from January 2009 to July 2011 were identified and categorized into 2 groups based on whether they received stress dose steroids.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Both cohorts were compared for patient demographics, duration of steroid treatment before surgery, and operative and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients received stress dose steroids and 146 patients did not. Stress dose steroids were more frequently administered to patients who were under steroid treatment immediately before restorative proctocolectomy (37.1% versus 10.3%; p < 0.001). A sinus tachycardia developed more frequently in patients who received stress dose steroids during surgery (p = 0.03). One patient in the stress dose steroid group died on postoperative day 25 because of anastomotic leak. Although no patients in either group had an adrenal crisis during surgery, 1 patient in the stress dose steroid group was diagnosed with adrenal insufficiency postoperatively.

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its retrospective and nonrandomized nature.

CONCLUSIONS

Although administration of stress dose steroids is not related to increased postoperative complications, the steroids do not appear to affect adrenal insufficiency outcomes. Patients who were treated with steroids for ulcerative colitis should be monitored carefully in the perioperative and early postoperative periods for signs of adrenal insufficiency, regardless of the steroid regimen used.

Corticosteroids and wound healing: clinical considerations in the perioperative period

BACKGROUND

Determining whether systemic corticosteroids impair wound healing is a clinically relevant topic that has important management implications.

METHODS

We reviewed literature on the effects of corticosteroids on wound healing from animal and human studies searching MEDLINE from 1949 to 2011.

RESULTS

Some animal studies show a 30% reduction in wound tensile strength with perioperative corticosteroids at 15 to 40 mg/kg/day. The preponderance of human literature found that high-dose corticosteroid administration for <10 days has no clinically important effect on wound healing. In patients taking chronic corticosteroids for at least 30 days before surgery, their rates of wound complications may be increased 2 to 5 times compared with those not taking corticosteroids. Complication rates may vary depending on dose and duration of steroid use, comorbidities, and types of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute, high-dose systemic corticosteroid use likely has no clinically significant effect on wound healing, whereas chronic systemic steroids may impair wound healing in susceptible individuals.

Surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis in the biologic therapy era

Recently introduced in the treatment algorithms and guidelines for the treatment of ulcerative colitis, biological therapy is an effective treatment option for patients with an acute severe flare not responsive to conventional treatments and for patients with steroid dependent disease. The reduction in hospitalization and surgical intervention for patients affected by ulcerative colitis after the introduction of biologic treatment remains to be proven. Furthermore, these agents seem to be associated with increase in cost of treatment and risk for serious postoperative complications. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the surgical treatment of choice in ulcerative colitis patients. Surgery is traditionally recommended as salvage therapy when medical management fails, and, despite advances in medical therapy, colectomy rates remain unchanged between 20% and 30%. To overcome the reported increase in postoperative complications in patients on biologic therapies, several surgical strategies have been developed to maintain long-term pouch failure rate around 10%, as previously reported. Surgical staging along with the development of minimally invasive surgery are among the most promising advances in this field.

Role of ileostomy in restorative proctocolectomy

Restorative proctocolectomy (RP) is the treatment of choice in patients affected with refractory ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis. Surgery in elective settings is often performed in 2 stages, fashioning an ileostomy which is closed 2-3-mo later. It is still debated whether omitting ileostomy could offer advantages in the management of patients undergoing RP.

Feasibility of laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy without diverting stoma

AIM

Restorative proctocolectomy performed before the advent of laparoscopy had evolved to frequently omit a diverting stoma. Our aim was to assess the impact of a diverting stoma on postoperative outcomes following laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy.

METHOD

Data on all patients undergoing a laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy at our institution were prospectively collated in a database.

RESULTS

Between November 2004 and February 2010, 71 patients (38 females) underwent laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy. Indications included familial adenomatous polyposis (n=34), ulcerative colitis (n=35), indeterminate colitis (n=1) and Lynch syndrome (n=1). Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy was performed as a one-stage procedure in 49 patients, and after a sub-total colectomy in 22. Seven patients in each group underwent the formation of a diverting stoma. Nine patients required conversion to open surgery. Sixteen patients experienced at least one postoperative complication. The postoperative morbidity was 29% (n=4/14) and 21% (n=12/21) in patients with and without a stoma (p=0.8), and the rate of fistula was 21% and 5%, respectively (p=0.08). Seven percent of patients with a stoma and 16% without stoma had an intra-abdominal collection (p=0.7). Nine patients required reoperation. The reoperation rate was not influenced by the presence or absence of a diverting stoma.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy can be performed safely without a diverting stoma in selected patients.

Anti-TNF-alpha therapies do not increase early postoperative complications in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. An Italian single-center experience

PURPOSE

The impact of preoperative use of TNF-alpha inhibitors on postoperative complications in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) undergoing abdominal surgery is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the 30-day postoperative outcomes for IBD patients treated with these drugs prior to surgery.

METHODS

We analyzed retrospectively the incidence of short-term postoperative complications. Statistical analyses were performed to reveal the independent variables that influenced postoperative complications and the role of preoperative medical therapy with anti-TNF drugs within 12 weeks prior to surgery.

RESULTS

One hundred fourteen patients (76 with Crohn's disease (CD) and 38 ulcerative colitis (UC)) underwent abdominal surgery for IBD. Fifty-four patients were treated with anti-TNF-alpha within 12 weeks prior to surgery (anti-TNF group). Postoperative mortality and morbidity were 0% and 21%, respectively. The infection rate was 15%. A significantly higher incidence of postoperative complications was found in patients treated with high-dose steroids (58% vs. 17%; p = 0.003) after univariate analysis. The infection rate was significantly higher in patients treated with high-dose corticosteroids (50% vs. 11%; p = 0.002) and concomitant anti-TNF-alpha (60% vs. 13%; p = 0.023). Multivariate analysis revealed that only therapy with high-dose corticosteroids was significantly associated with cumulative (p = 0.017) and infective postoperative complications (p = 0.046). No significant differences were found between the anti-TNF group and the control group.

CONCLUSION

High-dose corticosteroids increased the risk of short-term postoperative cumulative and infective complications. Anti-TNF drugs within 12 weeks prior to abdominal surgery in patients with IBD did not appear to increase the rate of postoperative complications.

Neutrophil dysfunction in steroid-overdosed patients with ulcerative colitis: potential relevance of macrophage migration inhibitory factor to increased postoperative morbidity

PURPOSE

We studied macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF)-related neutrophil dysfunction in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), under conditions of surgical stress, focusing in particular on total preoperative steroid dosages.

METHODS

Neutrophils were isolated from peripheral blood samples obtained from 21 UC patients soon after radical surgery for UC. The patients were divided into two subgroups according to their total preoperative prednisolone dosages. The neutrophil phagocytosis, viable cell, and cell necrosis rates after exposure to Escherichia coli were evaluated by flow cytometry. The supernatant concentrations of mediators after exposure to E. coli were evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

There was a significant positive correlation between the levels of MIF and the total preoperative dosage of prednisolone. More viable neutrophils from the high-dosage steroid group patients than from the low-dosage steroid group patients tended to undergo necrosis, followed by the release of neutrophil elastase after exposure to E. coli. The levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines were not enhanced after E. coli stimulation, but the levels of proinflammatory cytokines in the supernatants of neutrophils from the high-dosage steroid group patients were increased significantly.

CONCLUSION

Steroid-overdosed UC patients with MIF-related neutrophil dysfunction may be at increased risk of destructive local inflammation following surgery.

Adverse effects of preoperative steroid use on surgical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Preoperative steroid use has been associated with increased postoperative complications. We sought to establish these risks using data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP).

METHODS

NSQIP public use files from 2005 to 2008 were analyzed for preoperative steroid use and postoperative adverse events.

RESULTS

Of 635,265 patients identified, 20,434 (3.2%) used steroids preoperatively. Superficial surgical site infections (SSI) increased from 2.9% to 5% using steroids (odds ratio, 1.724). Deep SSIs increased from .8% to 1.8% (odds ratio, 2.353). Organ/space SSIs and dehiscence increased 2 to 3-fold with steroid use (odds ratios, 2.469 and 3.338, respectively). Mortality increased almost 4-fold (1.6% to 6.0%; odds ratio, 3.920). All results were significant (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Previous concerns related to surgical risks in patients on chronic steroid regimens appear valid. These results may assist in counselling patients regarding the increased risk of surgery. They may also help the surgeon plan and modify the procedure if possible.

Minimally invasive pouch surgery for ulcerative colitis: is there a benefit in staging?

BACKGROUND

With the introduction of biologic agents, medical and surgical management of ulcerative colitis has been associated with significant morbidity. A staged surgical approach is advocated to obviate the risks of infectious complication and consequent poor pouch function.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of our selective staged approaches in patients with ulcerative colitis who were undergoing laparoscopic pouch surgery.

DESIGN

Consecutive patients with ulcerative colitis referred for laparoscopic surgical treatment between 2002 and 2008 were included in the study. Data were prospectively collected. Patients were divided into 2 groups: a 3-stage group, initial laparoscopic abdominal colectomy followed by pouch surgery with a diverting loop ileostomy, and a 2-stage group, laparoscopic pouch surgery with a diverting loop ileostomy at the initial operation.

RESULTS

Of the 118 patients eligible for the study, 68 were in the 2-stage group and 50 were in the 3-stage group. Patients were more likely to have been receiving aggressive medical therapy in the 3-stage group than in the 2-stage group: 43% vs 16% (P = .01) receiving anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy and 96% vs 67% (P = .04) receiving systemic corticosteroids. Although overall complication rates were similar between groups (P = .4), infectious complications were higher in the 2-stage group (38.2% vs 21%, P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

In our practice, we have selectively applied a 3-stage laparoscopic surgical approach to restorative proctocolectomy in patients with ulcerative colitis who are receiving aggressive medical therapy in an attempt to minimize perioperative complications. This strategy appears efficacious, and short-term outcomes compare favorably with those following a 2-stage approach.

Effect of corticosteroid dose and duration of administration on colonic anastomosis

BACKGROUND

Surgical intervention under concomitant steroid therapy can be complicated by impaired anastomotic healing. The aim of this experimental study was to investigate the effects of a corticosteroid (methylprednisolone) on healing colonic anastomoses in relation to the dose and duration of administration.

METHODS

Fifty male Spraque-Dawley rats weighing 200-220 g were divided into five groups each containing 10 rats. No treatment was given in the control group. Group HDST: high-dose methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg/day, intramuscular) treatment for a short term of 2 days; group HDLT: high-dose methylprednisolone treatment for a long term of 60 days; group LDST: low-dose methylprednisolone (0.28 mg/kg/day) treatment for a short term of 2 days; and group LDLT: low-dose methylprednisolone treatment for a long term of 60 days. Standard left colonic anastomosis was performed in all rats. Anastomotic bursting pressure, hydroxyproline measurement, and histopathological data were evaluated in all groups on postoperative day 4.

RESULTS

The mean anastomotic bursting pressure value was significantly lower in the HDLT group (P < 0.05). The mean hydroxyproline levels were significantly lower in all groups (P < 0.05). Histopathological results demonstrated significant changes according to neutrophil infiltration, granulation tissue formation, presence of vascularization, and peritonitis in the HDLT, LDST, and LDLT groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

High and low doses of the corticosteroid produced adverse effects on the healing of colon anastomosis in rats regardless of whether it was administered over a long or short preoperative period. However, the most prominent negative effect was associated with high-dose, long-term corticosteroid administration.

Perioperative corticosteroid reduces hospital stay after fronto-orbital advancement

Facial swelling is common after fronto-orbital advancement. Edema and closure of the palpebral fissures can lead to prolonged hospitalization. The purpose of this study was to determine if perioperative corticosteroid shortens hospital stay after this procedure.We retrospectively studied consecutive children younger than 2 years who underwent primary fronto-orbital advancement between 1990 and 2008. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: group 1 patients were not given corticosteroid; group 2 patients received tapered perioperative dexamethasone. Primary outcome variables included length of hospital stay and infection rate.A total of 161 patients were included in the study. Hospitalization was significantly shorter (P = 0.008) for group 2 (n = 65; median duration, 3.0 d) than group 1 (n = 96; median duration, 5.0 d). Infection rates did not differ between groups (group 1, 2.1%; group 2, 1.5%; P = 0.8).Perioperative corticosteroid shortens hospitalization after fronto-orbital advancement without increasing the incidence of postoperative infection. The cost of postoperative hospital care was reduced by 27.2%.

Ileal reservoir with ileo-anal anastomosis: long-term complications

Coloproctectomy with ileo-anal anastomosis (CP-IAA) has been in use for 30 years. This intervention is the standard technique when surgery is indicated for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and for ulcerative colitis (UC). Although the surgery is safe with mortality of less than 1%, it is associated with a morbidity of 18-70%. We thought a literature review about long-term complications would be enlightening. Pouchitis is the most common complication; it occurs in 70% of patients over 20 years follow-up; small bowel obstruction affects 25% of patients and pelvic sepsis occurs in 20-30% within 10 years. CP-IAA can impact the patient's sexual life due to erectile and ejaculatory dysfunction, dyspareunia, and incontinence of stool during sexual intercourse. Nevertheless, patients with long-standing UC describe an overall improvement in their sexual function after surgery. The failure rate varies from 3.5 to 15%; major causes of failure are sepsis, unrecognized Crohn's disease, and poor functional results. Cases of dysplasia and cancer have been reported in the reservoir, but more particularly when there is retained colonic glandular mucosa. The transitional zone should be monitored whenever there are risk factors for colon neoplasia. The relatively high morbidity of CP-IAA should not overshadow the good functional results of this technique.

Postoperative outcome of colectomy for pediatric patients with ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Few studies have reported on the surgical outcomes of colectomy in pediatric patients with ulcerative colitis (UC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of all pediatric patients diagnosed with UC who underwent colectomy at UCSF between 1980 and 2005 to identify early (within 30 days) and later complications of surgery.

RESULTS

Complete medical records were available for 31 patients [12.4 +/- 3.3 (range 6-19) years] with UC who underwent colectomy at UCSF Children's Hospital. Total colectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) was performed in 21 of the 31 patients (12 without diverting ileostomy). Five of the 31 patients had an initial colectomy with IPAA and J-pouch performed later; 4 had an initial subtotal colectomy for urgent indications. Only one of 31 had IPAA with S-pouch. The median number of early postoperative complications was 1.0; 4 required additional surgery to treat complications. The most common early complications were small intestinal obstruction in 6 (19%) and wound infection in 4 (13%). Preoperative medications included corticosteroids in 25 (81%), 6-mercaptopurine/azathioprine in 10 (32%), and 5-aminosalicylates in 19 (61%). Medication exposure was not related to postoperative complications. Late complications included pouchitis in 12 (39%), anastomotic, anal, or rectal strictures in 5 (16%), and fistulas in 5 (16%); 1 (3%) was subsequently diagnosed as having Crohn disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Postcolectomy morbidity is common among pediatric patients with UC. Preoperative medications were not associated with postoperative complications. Investigations to determine preoperative factors affecting surgical outcomes and long-term satisfaction following this surgery in a large pediatric cohort are needed.

Risk factors associated with surgical site infection after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis

PURPOSE

Surgery for inflammatory bowel disease is known to be have an increased risk of morbidity. Few studies have investigated the risk factors for surgical site infection in patients undergoing surgery for inflammatory bowel disease restricted to ulcerative colitis, and no known precise evaluation of risk factors has been presented because of the many differences and confounding factors, such as disease specificities, surgical procedures, and patient characteristics. We evaluated the influences of patient conditions on the occurrence of surgical site infection after an ileal J-pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

Surgical site infections in 192 patients with ulcerative colitis who underwent surgery at Hyogo College of Medicine between March 2006 and April 2008 were investigated. Possible risk factors for surgical site infection were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to determine the predictive significance of those factors.

RESULTS

The incidence of incisional surgical site infection was 12.5%, and the incidence of organ/space surgical site infection was 1.6%. In a stepwise logistic regression model, total prednisolone >or=10,000 mg (odds ratio, 3.33; 95% CI 1.03-10.73;P = .04) and American Society of Anesthesiologists' score >or=3 (odds ratio, 3.45; 95% CI 1.12-10.62; P = .03) were shown to be independent risk factors for incisional surgical site infection, whereas no risk factors were found for overall surgical site infection.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that a higher total steroid dose is related to incisional surgical site infection with fewer confounding factors in patients with ulcerative colitis. In addition, total prednisolone >or=10,000 mg may be an additional factor for surgical indication in these patients.

Positive nasal culture of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a risk factor for surgical site infection in orthopedics

BACKGROUND

Although nasal carriage of MRSA has been identified as one of the risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) with MRSA, there have been no reports of this in the orthopedics field.

METHODS

This prospective observational cohort study included 2,423 consecutive patients who were admitted to our department over 26 months and who underwent orthopedic surgery. We examined the relationship between pre-existing nasal MRSA and subsequent occurrence of SSI with MRSA.

RESULTS

63 patients (2.6%) had a positive nasal MRSA culture. 15 patients (0.6%) developed SSI with MRSA. The occurrence of SSI with MRSA in nasal MRSA carriers was significantly higher than that in non-carriers (4 out of 63 (6.3%) vs. 11 out of 2,360 (0.5%); p < 0.001) (adjusted OR: 11; 95% CI: 3-37; p = 0.001).

INTERPRETATION

We recommend appropriate treatment of patients who are nasal carriers of MRSA before orthopedic surgery.

The cumulative burden of oral corticosteroid side effects and the economic implications of steroid use

Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are a key part of therapy regimens for a diverse variety of conditions. Despite their efficacy, they are associated with a wide variety of adverse events. The purpose of this review was to identify the range of adverse events that have been reported to be related to oral corticosteroids, examine the factors that influence their incidence and estimate the economic burden caused by these adverse events. In 61 identified studies, 21 different categories of OCS related adverse events were reported with increased fracture risk being the category most frequently described. Most studies that examined factors linked to the incidence of OCS related adverse events found that dose, age, gender, duration of use, treatment history, smoking habits or cholesterol level were influential in determining risk. Additionally, a cumulative economic analysis of selected adverse events found the annual cost of treating these events in the UK to be at least 165 pounds per patient taking OCS. The clinical and economic burden of OCS related adverse events highlights the need for OCS sparing therapies to be developed.

Outcomes for patients developing anastomotic leak after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: does a handsewn vs. stapled anastomosis matter?

PURPOSE

Outcomes for patients developing a leak after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis have not been well investigated. This study explored whether the use of a stapled or handsewn anastomosis was associated with different outcomes when an anastomotic leak developed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were identified from a prospectively maintained pouch database. Functional outcomes regarding bowel movements, urgency, continence, and seepage were evaluated. Quality of life was assessed by the Cleveland Global Quality of Life Score.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-five patients with anastomotic leak (141 stapled and 34 handsewn anastomosis) were identified. The two groups were similar in gender and diagnosis. Patients with handsewn anastomosis were younger (P = 0.04), had less perioperative steroid use (P = 0.05), more proximal diversion (P = 0.02), and S-pouch creation (P = 0.003). More handsewn cases had intraoperative transfusion (P = 0.04) and postoperative hemorrhage within the pelvis (P = 0.003). Long-term pouch failure was 35.3 percent in the handsewn group and 12 percent in the stapled group (P = 0.002), which was confirmed by Kaplan-Meier analysis (Log-rank P = 0.007). On multivariate analysis, leak after handsewn anastomosis was independently associated with pouch failure. Leak after stapled anastomosis carried a lower incontinence rate at 5 years (P = 0.03), while handsewn had higher nocturnal seepage rate at 3, 5, and 10 years, and most recent follow-up. Cleveland Global Quality of Life Score was comparable between the groups during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes including functional results and pouch failure rates for patients developing a leak after stapled anastomosis at ileal pouch-anal anastomosis were significantly better than outcomes for patients who develop a leak after handsewn anastomosis.

Minimally invasive subtotal colectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for fulminant ulcerative colitis: a reasonable approach?

PURPOSE

This study was designed to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of three-stage minimally invasive surgery for fulminant ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

Using a prospective database, we identified all patients with ulcerative colitis who underwent minimally invasive surgery for both subtotal colectomy and subsequent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis at our institution from 2000 to 2007. Demographics and short-term outcomes were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

During seven years, 50 patients underwent minimally invasive subtotal colectomy for fulminant ulcerative colitis; 50 percent were male, with a median age of 34 years. All patients had refractory colitis: 96 percent were taking steroids, 76 percent were recently hospitalized, 59 percent had >/=5 kg weight loss, 57 percent had anemia that required transfusions, 30 percent were on biologic-based therapy, and 96 percent had >/=1 severe Truelove & Witts' criteria. Of these 50 procedures, 72 percent were performed by using laparoscopic-assisted and 28 percent with hand-assisted techniques. The conversion rate was 6 percent. Subsequently, minimally invasive completion proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was performed in 42 patients with a 2.3 percent conversion rate. Median length of stay after each procedure was four days. There was one anastomotic leak and no mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

A staged, minimally invasive approach for patients with fulminant ulcerative colitis is technically feasible, safe, and reasonable operative strategy, which yields short postoperative length of stay.

Does mesorectal preservation protect the ileoanal anastomosis after restorative proctocolectomy?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The technique of rectal dissection during restorative proctocolectomy might influence the rate of septic complications. The aim of this study was to analyze the morbidity of restorative proctocolectomy in a consecutive series of patients who had rectal dissection with complete preservation of the mesorectum.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred thirty-one patients who had restorative proctocolectomy for chronic inflammatory bowel disease with handsewn ileopouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and preservation of the mesorectal tissue were analyzed by chart reviews and a follow-up investigation at a median of 85 (14-169) months after surgery.

RESULTS

Only one of 131 patients had a leak from the IPAA, and one patient had a pelvic abscess without evidence of leakage, resulting in 1.5% local septic complications. All other complications including the pouch failure rate (7.6%) and the incidence of both fistula (6.4%) and pouchitis (47.9%) were comparable to the data from the literature.

CONCLUSION

The low incidence of local septic complications in this series might at least in part result from the preservation of the mesorectum. As most studies do not specify the technique of rectal dissection, this theory cannot be verified by an analysis of the literature and needs further approval by a randomized trial.

Preoperative steroid use and risk of postoperative complications in patients with inflammatory bowel disease undergoing abdominal surgery

CONTEXT

Corticosteroids are the mainstay of medical therapies to induce remission in acute episodes of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, evidence suggests that this may increase the risk of postoperative complications among patients with IBD who go on to have abdominal surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the risk of postoperative complications following abdominal surgery in patients with IBD on steroids at the time of abdominal surgery.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis of observational studies.

METHODS

We searched medical electronic databases for full journal articles published after 1965 reporting on postoperative complications in patients with IBD undergoing abdominal surgery provided they compared patients treated with steroids with those not on steroids. We hand searched the reference lists of all retrieved articles. Two independent reviewers extracted data from studies meeting the inclusion criteria and any discrepancies were resolved by discussion. We carried out fixed effects meta-analysis, funnel plot and sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

A total of seven observational studies involving 1,532 patients met the inclusion criteria for risk of total complications, and five observational studies involving 1,714 patients met the inclusion criteria for risk of infectious complications. Pooled analysis showed an increased risk of all postoperative complications (OR 1.41, 95% confidence interval 1.07-1.87), as well as an increased risk of postoperative infectious complications (OR 1.68, 95% confidence interval 1.24-2.28) among patients on steroids. Patients who received higher doses of perioperative oral steroids (>40 mg) had a higher risk of total complications (OR 2.04 (95% CI 1.28-3.26).

CONCLUSIONS

There is an increased risk of total as well as infectious complications following the use of steroids in patients with IBD.

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

BACKGROUND

Since 1977, restorative proctocolectomy with ileoanal anastomosis (IAA) has evolved into the surgical treatment of choice for most patients with intractable ulcerative colitis. Construction of an ileal pouch reservoir is now standard, usually in the form of J pouch (IPAA). The aim of this report is to review selection criteria for, and functional outcomes, follow-up and management of complications of IPAA after 30 years of widespread clinical application.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Literature published in English on the clinical indications, surgical technique, morbidity, complications and outcome following IAA and IPAA was sourced by electronic search, performed independently by two reviewers who selected potentially relevant papers based on title and abstract. Additional articles were identified by cross-referencing from papers retrieved in the initial search.

CONCLUSION

The functional results of IPAA are good. Pouchitis, irritable pouch syndrome and cuffitis are specific long-term complications but rarely result in failure. Pouch salvage is possible in selected patients with poor functional outcomes. One-stage operations are increasingly performed.

The impact of preoperative immunomodulation on pouch-related septic complications after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

PURPOSE

We studied preoperative and perioperative factors with particular attention to the role of immunomodulatory medication, which may impact the incidence of pouch-related septic complications.

METHODS

A retrospective review of data from patients who underwent ileal pouch surgery during a 20-year period from 1985 to 2005 was performed. Preoperative use of immunomodulatory medication along with perioperative clinical, surgical, and disease variables were recorded. Patients were monitored for pouch-related sepsis in the early (within 30 days of surgery) and late (after 30 days of surgery) postoperative periods. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

There were 445 patients (206 females; 46.4 percent). Median age was 36 (interquartile range, 27-46) years. Median follow-up period was 52 (interquartile range, 26-86) months. Complete data were available for 335 patients. Early sepsis was seen in 58 patients (17.3 percent). Another 22 patients (6.5 percent) developed late sepsis. On multivariate analysis, only steroid use remained predictive of higher rates of early sepsis (odds ratio, 1.81; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.02-3.45; P=0.002). Likewise on multivariate analysis, both male gender (odds ratio, 0.24; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.09-0.71; P=0.007) and 5-aminosalicylic-acid use (odds ratio, 0.22; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.08-0.76; P=0.023) remained predictive of lower rates of sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative steroid use is associated with higher rates of early but not late pouch-related septic complications. We recommend that patients be weaned of steroids before ileal pouch surgery or be warned of the higher risk of postoperative sepsis.

Ileal pouch surgery for ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a relapsing and remitting disease characterised by chronic mucosal and submucosal inflammation of the colon and rectum. Treatment may vary depending upon the extent and severity of inflammation. Broadly speaking medical treatments aim to induce and then maintain remission. Surgery is indicated for inflammatory disease that is refractory to medical treatment or in cases of neoplastic transformation. Approximately 25% of patients with UC ultimately require colectomy. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become the standard of care for patients with ulcerative colitis who ultimately require colectomy. This review will examine indications for IPAA, patient selection, technical aspects of surgery, management of complications and long term outcome following this procedure.

Should ileoanal pouch surgery be staged for patients with mucosal ulcerative colitis on immunosuppressives?

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

Much debate has revolved around whether patients with mucosal ulcerative colitis (MUC) receiving immunosuppression should be weaned off immunosuppressives before undergoing ileal pouch surgery. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the affect of immunosuppressive drugs on postoperative complications after ileoanal pouch surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective medical record review of patients with MUC who underwent ileal pouch surgery while taking immunosuppressive drugs such as azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), methotrexate, and cyclosporin A was performed. Postoperative complications in the study group were compared to three matched groups: patients with MUC who had ileoanal pouch surgery while taking systemic steroids, patients with MUC not receiving any immunosuppressive drugs, and patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients with MUC who underwent ileoanal pouch surgery while taking immunosuppressive drugs were identified from a prospectively entered database of patients who had this surgery between 1988 and 2005. All but two patients underwent temporary fecal diversion. Fifteen patients were taking 6-MP or azathioprine; six were on cyclosporine A, and one both on azathioprine and cyclosporine A. Fifteen patients were also taking steroids at the time of ileoanal pouch surgery. Early (within 30 days of surgery) and late complications occurred in 36 and 50% of the study group patients, respectively, but did not significantly differ from a matched group of patients with MUC who did not take immunosuppressive drugs. Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis had a significantly lower long-term complication rate.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective case-matched study suggests that the use of immunosuppressive drugs and cyclosporine A may not be associated with an increased rate of complications after ileoanal pouch surgery.