Placebo-controlled trial of cisapride in postgastrectomy patients with duodenogastroesophageal reflux

Systematic review: duodenogastroesophageal (biliary) reflux prevalence, symptoms, oesophageal lesions and treatment

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of duodenogastroesophageal reflux (DGER) and its effect on symptoms and oesophageal lesions in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is unclear.

AIMS

To conduct a systematic review to determine the prevalence of DGER among patients with GERD, the effect of DGER on symptoms and oesophageal lesions, and the treatment of DGER.

METHODS

We searched Pubmed and MEDLINE for full text, English language articles until October 2020 that evaluated DGER prevalence among patients with GERD, the effect of DGER on symptoms and oesophageal lesions, and the treatment of DGER.

RESULTS

We identified 3891 reports and included 35 which analysed DGER prevalence in GERD, 15 which evaluated its effect in non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), 17 on erosive oesophagitis, 23 in Barrett's, and 13 which evaluated the treatment of DGER. The prevalence of DGER, when evaluated by Bilitec, among all GERD patients ranged from 10% to 97%, in NERD 10%-63%, in erosive oesophagitis 22%-80% and in Barrett's 50%-100%. There were no differences in the presence or degree of DGER among patients who were asymptomatic or symptomatic on proton pump inhibitors (PPI). The most commonly evaluated treatments for DGER were PPIs and DGER reduced post-PPI therapy in all studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of DGER increased with more advanced oesophageal lesions and did not explain persisting symptoms among patients taking PPI therapy. PPIs appear to be effective in the treatment of DGER. DGER remains an important consideration in patients with GERD and future therapies deserve more study.

Systematic review: cardiovascular safety profile of 5-HT(4) agonists developed for gastrointestinal disorders

BACKGROUND

The nonselective 5-HT(4) receptor agonists, cisapride and tegaserod have been associated with cardiovascular adverse events (AEs).

AIM

To perform a systematic review of the safety profile, particularly cardiovascular, of 5-HT(4) agonists developed for gastrointestinal disorders, and a nonsystematic summary of their pharmacology and clinical efficacy.

METHODS

Articles reporting data on cisapride, clebopride, prucalopride, mosapride, renzapride, tegaserod, TD-5108 (velusetrag) and ATI-7505 (naronapride) were identified through a systematic search of the Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase and Toxfile. Abstracts from UEGW 2006-2008 and DDW 2008-2010 were searched for these drug names, and pharmaceutical companies approached to provide unpublished data.

RESULTS

Retrieved articles on pharmacokinetics, human pharmacodynamics and clinical data with these 5-HT(4) agonists, are reviewed and summarised nonsystematically. Articles relating to cardiac safety and tolerability of these agents, including any relevant case reports, are reported systematically. Two nonselective 5-HT(4) agonists had reports of cardiovascular AEs: cisapride (QT prolongation) and tegaserod (ischaemia). Interactions with, respectively, the hERG cardiac potassium channel and 5-HT(1) receptor subtypes have been suggested to account for these effects. No cardiovascular safety concerns were reported for the newer, selective 5-HT(4) agonists prucalopride, velusetrag, naronapride, or for nonselective 5-HT(4) agonists with no hERG or 5-HT(1) affinity (renzapride, clebopride, mosapride).

CONCLUSIONS

5-HT(4) agonists for GI disorders differ in chemical structure and selectivity for 5-HT(4) receptors. Selectivity for 5-HT(4) over non-5-HT(4) receptors may influence the agent's safety and overall risk-benefit profile. Based on available evidence, highly selective 5-HT(4) agonists may offer improved safety to treat patients with impaired GI motility.

Cisapride: what can we learn from the rise and fall of a prokinetic?

Cisapride, the prototype serotonergic agent, evolved from a body of research that defined the key roles of serotonergic receptors in gastrointestinal motor and sensory function. Impressed by its in vitro properties and encouraged by clinical trial data, cisapride became the drug of choice for the treatment of a wide range of motility disorders and clinicians appeared impressed by its efficacy and comfortable with its side-effect profile. Once serious cardiac events began to be reported in association with cisapride therapy, dark clouds rapidly gathered and soon enveloped the drug, leading to its widespread withdrawal from markets. What lessons can we learn from the story of cisapride? How can its brief but spectacular rise and equally sensational demise inform the development of new drugs which are so sorely needed in the management of motility and functional gastrointestinal disorders? This review explores the background to the development of cisapride, its history in clinical trials and the experience with adverse events and, in so doing, attempts to identify lessons for the future in the therapeutics of enteric neuromodulatory drugs.

Rabeprazole combined with hydrotalcite is effective for patients with bile reflux gastritis after cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Regardless of surgical technique, patients who have undergone cholecystectomy appear to be predisposed to the development of bile reflux gastritis.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of rabeprazole and hydrotalcite in patients with bile reflux gastritis after cholecystectomy.

METHODS

Postcholecystectomy patients with bile reflux gastritis confirmed by endoscopy and 24 h gastric bilirubin monitoring were randomly assigned to one of four eight-week treatments: observation (group A), rabeprazole alone (group B), hydrotalcite alone (group C) and rabeprazole in combination with hydrotalcite (group D). Endoscopy and 24 h gastric bilirubin monitoring were repeated in all patients after treatment. Dyspeptic symptoms of abdominal pain, bloating, heartburn, bitter taste, endoscopic and histological finding, and biliary reflux were evaluated before and after treatment.

RESULTS

After administering medication, patient symptoms in groups B, C and D were relieved - most significantly in group D (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in endoscopic hyperemia and histological inflammation among the groups (P>0.05). However, histological activity, the number of reflux episodes and the number of reflux episodes lasting longer than 5 min were significantly decreased only in group D (P<0.05). The total per cent of bilirubin absorption (value of 0.14 units or greater) time was decreased in groups B, C and D, and most significantly in group D (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Rabeprazole combined with hydrotalcite is an effective therapeutic option in the treatment of patients with bile reflux gastritis after cholecystectomy.

Role of the gastric refluxate in gastroesophageal reflux disease: acid, weak acid and bile

The role of acid, weak/nonacid, and bile in the genesis of esophageal mucosal damage and reflux symptoms is complex. Acid combined with pepsin and unconjugated bile acids are critical to the development of esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus. Acid alone may be the principal factor in determining the severity of esophagitis. Weak acid or nonacid reflux does not cause esophageal damage or damage to adjacent organs, such as the larynx or lungs. The primary cause of heartburn and regurgitation is acid reflux, but a minority of symptoms (5%-15%) can be triggered by weak acid or bile reflux. The role is changed among patients on proton pump inhibitors with persistent symptoms, where the majority of symptoms are now due to weak acid or bile reflux. The proximal extent of the reflux, regardless of its acidity, seems to be the key to reflux symptoms.

Gastrointestinal motility after digestive surgery

Gastrointestinal (GI) motility dysfunction is a common complication of any abdominal surgical procedure. During fasting, the upper GI tract undergoes a cyclic change in motor activity, called the interdigestive migrating motor contraction (IMC). The IMC is divided into four phases, with phase III having the most characteristic activity. After digestive surgery, GI motility dysfunction shows a lack of a fed response, less phase II activity, more frequent phase III activity of the IMC, and some phase III activity migrating orally. Postoperative symptoms have been related to motor disturbances, such as interrupted or retrograde phase III or low postprandial activity. The causes of GI disorder are autonomic nervous dysfunction and GI hormone disruptions. The administration of a motilin agonist can induce earlier phase III contractions in the stomach after pancreatoduodenectomy. For nervous dysfunction, an inhibitory sympathetic reflux is likely to be important in postoperative motility disorders. Until recently, treatment for gut dysmotility has consisted of nasogastric suction, intravenous fluids, and observation; however, more effective treatment methods are being reported. Recent discoveries have the potential to decrease postoperative gut dysmotility remarkably after surgery.

Duodenogastro-esophageal reflux in children with refractory gastro-esophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE

To determine the role of duodenogastro-esophageal reflux (DGER) in the pathogenesis of refractory gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) in children.

STUDY DESIGN

Twenty-two patients (12 boys, mean age, 13.2 years) with GERD symptoms that persisted on omeprazole (1 mg/kg) underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and barium x-ray, 24-hour pH and DGER (Bilitec) monitoring, and a 13C octanoic acid gastric emptying breath test.

RESULTS

Patients presented mainly with epigastric pain, regurgitation, and nausea. Endoscopy revealed persistent esophagitis in 15 patients (68%). Pathologic acid and DGER exposure were present in 12 (55%) and 15 (68%) children, respectively, with combined pathologic reflux in 10 (45%). Acid exposure did not differ according to the presence of esophagitis, but patients with grade II esophagitis had significantly higher DGER exposure than those without esophagitis (9.1 +/- 5.3% vs 26.7 +/- 10.9% of the time, P < .05). Gastric emptying rate was not associated to acid or DGER exposure or persisting esophagitis. Symptoms improved after adding a prokinetic drug to the proton pump inhibitor therapy or referral for surgery (n = 5).

CONCLUSIONS

DGER may play a role in the pathophysiology of proton pump inhibitor-refractory GERD and esophagitis in children.

Review article: the role of bile and pepsin in the pathophysiology and treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is a multifaceted and multifactorial disorder which results from the reflux of gastric contents into the oesophagus. Animal studies suggest that synergism between acid and pepsin and conjugated bile acids have the greatest damaging potential for oesophageal mucosa, although unconjugated bile acids may be caustic at more neutral pH. Human studies are compatible with a synergistic action between acid and duodenogastric reflux in inducing lesions. During prolonged monitoring studies, typical gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms are more related to acid reflux events than to non-acid reflux events. However, symptoms that persist during acid suppressive therapy are often related to non-acid reflux events. The therapeutic options for the non-acid component of the refluxate, including acid suppression, prokinetics, baclofen, surgery and mucosal protective agents like alginates, are discussed.

Reflux esophagitis in patients with partial gastrectomy and Billroth I or II reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Data on the occurrence of reflux esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus in patients with Billroth I or II resection is sparse. For this reason a cross-sectional study was done in order to assess reflux disease in Billroth resection.

METHODS

Consecutive patients were included in the study. Coincidental pathology (hiatus hernia, ulcer, esophagitis, and cancer) was noted.

RESULTS

Over a period of 12 years, 370 consecutive patients with a partial gastrectomy were seen (268 Billroth II, 102 Billroth I) and three groups of patients were identified. Group 1 included 64 patients (17%) with a hiatus hernia; group 2, 16 patients (4%) with reflux esophagitis; and group 3, 290 patients (78%) with only a Billroth resection. Reflux disease occurred significantly more often in men than in women (7.5% vs. 2%, p<0.05). There was no difference in type of resection or in the presence of reflux esophagitis. Four patients had an esophageal cancer (only one adenocarcinoma).

CONCLUSION

Only a minority of patients with partial gastrectomy has signs of esophagitis in the long term.

Treatment of oesophageal bile reflux in children: the results of a prospective study with omeprazole

OBJECTIVES

Reflux of duodenal juice into the oesophagus has a role in the pathogenesis of both oesophageal and laryngopharyngeal inflammatory and neoplastic lesions. As little is known about effective therapy, we studied the effect of proton pump inhibitor therapy on oesophageal bile reflux in children.

METHODS

Twenty-nine children with moderate to severe erosive oesophagitis and abnormal oesophageal bile reflux were studied before and after treatment with omeprazole 1 mg/kg per day. Outcomes included a clinical symptom score, oesophageal acid and bile reflux (simultaneous 24-hour pH and Bilitec 2000 monitoring), and mucosal healing.

RESULTS

After 8 weeks of therapy, 17 (59%) of the patients were symptom-free, and 5 (17%) had minimal symptoms. Mucosal healing or reduction to low-grade oesophagitis was achieved in 25 children (86%; P < 0.0005). Mean percentages of total, upright, and supine time with oesophageal pH less than 4 were reduced from 17.0%, 16.8%, and 19.2% before treatment, to 2.83%, 3.17%, and 2.07%, respectively, after treatment (all P < 0.00001). Similarly, mean percentages of total, upright, and supine time with bile reflux were reduced from 16.96%, 12.67%, and 22.0%, to 2.27%, 1.91%, and 2.23%, respectively (P < 0.000001, P < 0.0001, and P < 0.000001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Omeprazole 1 mg/kg per day is an effective therapy for the majority of children with severe erosive oesophagitis due to abnormal isolated bile reflux or combined acid and bile reflux. It remains unclear how patients with treatment-resistant bile reflux should be managed.

Gastroesophageal reflux and gastric emptying, revisited

Total gastric emptying is delayed in 10% to 33% of adult patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but a strong correlation between duration of gastric emptying and severity of acid reflux or esophagitis has never been proved. Previous studies reported that patients with GERD might have exaggerated postprandial fundus relaxation with retention of food and triggering of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs). There is a positive correlation between postprandial fundus relaxation and number of TLESRs and also between proximal gastric emptying and esophageal acid exposure. However, new studies suggest that a high number of TLESRs and reflux events may occur even with accelerated gastric emptying, and prolonged gastric retention might be associated with less rather than more esophageal acid exposure. Using simultaneous gastric emptying and esophageal pH impedance we found that the rate of gastric emptying might determine the acidity and proximal extent of reflux: The slower the emptying, the higher the pH and proximal extent of the refluxate.

Oral trypsin inhibitor can improve reflux esophagitis after distal gastrectomy concomitant with decreased trypsin activity

BACKGROUND

The pathogenesis of reflux esophagitis is not well understood and remains controversial. Distal gastrectomy serves as a model to assess the role of duodenal reflux with low gastric acidity in the development of reflux esophagitis. We investigated the clinical usefulness and antitrypsin activity after treatment with a trypsin inhibitor, camostat mesilate, against the reflux esophagitis after distal gastrectomy reconstructed with Billroth-I anastomosis.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease after distal gastrectomy were prescreened according to esophageal pH level and trypsin activity, and consequently 11 patients were enrolled in the present clinical study. Esophageal and duodenal washings were aspirated for the evaluation of the pretreatment trypsin activity. Then 100 mg of camostat mesilate was administered orally. At 30 and 120 minutes after the administration, duodenal washings were aspirated for the evaluation of posttreatment trypsin activity. Thereafter, 300 mg of camostat mesilate was administered orally 3 times daily for a 4-week period. On the 28th day of administration, the grade of reflux esophagitis (Los Angeles classification) was re-evaluated under endoscopy and the esophageal washings were aspirated for the evaluation of trypsin activity.

RESULTS

The trypsin activities in the duodenum both at 30 and 120 minutes after oral ingestion of camostat mesilate were decreased significantly in comparison with those in the pretreatment period in each patient (P<.001). In 6 of 7 patients with detectable trypsin activity in the esophagus, the activities after the 28th day of treatment were lower than those in the pretreatment period, and the symptoms were milder than those before treatment (P<.05). Furthermore, endoscopic evaluation showed that 40% of patients were grade B, C, and D after treatment (28th day), whereas 70% of patients were grade B, C, and D before the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral administration of trypsin inhibitor can improve reflux esophagitis after distal gastrectomy concomitant with decreased trypsin activity.

Review article: role of pepsin and bile in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is defined as the presence of symptoms or lesions that can be attributed to the reflux of gastric contents into the oesophagus. Aspiration and prolonged monitoring studies in humans have shown that reflux of gastric contents is comprised of both acid and non-acid components, in healthy as well as diseased people. Methods to monitor the non-acid component of the refluxate are described in detail. Experimental models suggest that synergism between acid and pepsin and conjugated bile acids have the greatest damaging potential for oesophageal mucosa, although unconjugated bile acids may be caustic at a more neutral pH. Human studies are compatible with a synergistic action between acid and duodenogastric reflux in inducing lesions. During prolonged monitoring studies, typical gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms are more related to acid reflux events than to non-acid reflux events. However, symptoms that persist during acid-suppressive therapy are often related to non-acid reflux events. The therapeutic options for the non-acid component of the refluxate, including acid suppression, prokinetics, baclofen and surgery, are discussed.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease poorly responsive to single-dose proton pump inhibitors in patients without Barrett's esophagus: acid reflux, bile reflux, or both?

OBJECTIVES

Studies using ambulatory pH and esophageal bile reflux monitoring (Bilitec) have shown that both acid reflux and duodeno-gastro-esophageal reflux (DGER) frequently occur in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). A subset of patients with GERD has persistent reflux symptoms in spite of standard doses of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of acid and DGER in patients with reflux disease poorly responsive to PPIs.

METHODS

Sixty-five patients (32 men, 44 +/- 2 yr) without Barrett's esophagus and with persistent heartburn or regurgitation during standard PPI doses were studied. They underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and simultaneous 24-h ambulatory pH and Bilitec monitoring while PPIs were continued.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients (51%) had persistent esophagitis. Seven patients (11%) had only pathological acid exposure, 25 (38%) had only pathological DGER exposure, and 17 (26%) had pathological exposure to both acid and DGER. Acid exposure under PPI was positive in only 37%, but adding Bilitec increased the diagnoses of persistent reflux to 75%. Patients with persistent esophagitis had similar acid exposure, but significantly higher DGER exposure than those without esophagitis. The highest prevalence of esophagitis was found in patients with pathological exposure to both acid and DGER; symptoms did not differ according to the type of reflux.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined pH and Bilitec monitoring is superior to pH monitoring alone in demonstrating ongoing pathological reflux in patients with medically poorly responsive reflux disease.

Duodenogastric Reflux-induced (Alkaline) Esophagitis

Duodenogastric reflux is the retrograde flow of duodenal contents into the stomach that then mix with acid and pepsin. These agents can reflux into the esophagus (ie, duodenogastroesophageal reflux ) and cause gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and its complications, including stricture, Barrett's esophagus, and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Medical and surgical treatments of DGER can be difficult. Best medical treatment is proton-pump inhibitors, which decrease DGER by inhibiting both gastric acidity and volume, making less gastric contents available to reflux into the esophagus. The addition of the gamma-aminobutyric (GABA(B)) receptor agonist baclofen may further reduce DGER in patients not responding to proton-pump inhibitors. Bile acid-binding agents (aluminum-containing antacids, cholestyramine, sucralfate, urosodeoxycholic acid) have physiologic rationale, but their efficacy is unproven. Prokinetic agents can reduce DGER and its upper gastrointestinal symptoms by promoting increased gastric emptying. In patients with medically refractory symptoms, a Roux-en-Y diversion or duodenal switch operation may be helpful.

Does the addition of a prokinetic to proton pump inhibitor therapy help reduce duodenogastro-oesophageal reflux in patients with Barrett's oesophagus?

OBJECTIVE

The metaplastic change of Barrett's oesophagus is linked to both acid and duodenal reflux together with impaired motility. Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) reduce acid reflux, but no treatment is available that reduces duodenogastro-oesophageal reflux (DGOR). The aim of this study was to investigate whether adding a prokinetic to PPI treatment could improve oesophageal motility and subsequently reduce reflux.

METHODS

Two groups of patients with Barrett's oesophagus on PPI therapy (prokinetic, n = 12; placebo, n = 11) were investigated. At visit 1, ambulatory oesophageal manometry was performed, and peristaltic and simultaneous wave percentage and characteristics were measured. DGOR and pH measurements were also performed. After treatment with either the prokinetic cisapride or placebo, all investigations were repeated (visit 2). Analysis of covariance and Spearman's correlation coefficients of changes from visit 1 to visit 2 were used to compare data.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to DGOR, DGOR characteristics, or the percentage of peristalsis and simultaneous waves and their characteristics. There was no correlation between DGOR and motility changes. Although no significant differences existed between acid reflux in the two groups, five patients with high supine acid reflux showed a significant reduction after treatment with cisapride.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of cisapride to PPI treatment does not appear to improve oesophageal motility or reduce DGOR in patients with Barrett's oesophagus.

Duodenogastroesophageal reflux and methods to monitor nonacidic reflux

The role of duodenogastroesophageal reflux (DGER), once erroneously termed "bile reflux," in causing esophageal mucosal damage has been an area of interest in both animal and human studies. However, because of the lack of appropriate techniques to accurately measure DGER, extrapolation of findings from animal studies to humans has been difficult to make. The recent advent of the Bilitec system (Metronics Instruments, Minneapolis, MN), an ambulatory bilirubin monitoring device, is increasing our knowledge of the specific role of DGER in esophageal diseases. Studies suggest that DGER without acid reflux may result in symptoms, but unless acid reflux is present simultaneously, it does not cause esophagitis. Therefore, therapies should aim at reducing both DGER and acid reflux. Studies show that this may be accomplished by antireflux surgery or the use of proton pump inhibitors, which by reducing gastric volume, decrease the damaging potential of both acid and DGER.

New techniques in measuring nonacidic esophageal reflux

New techniques in esophageal monitoring are allowing for better differentiation in the role of different gastric refluxates in esophageal mucosal damage and patient symptoms. The Bilitec 2001 (Synectics, Stockholm, Sweden) is a portable spectrophotometer that measures bilirubin as a surrogate marker for bile reflux and multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) (Sandhill Scientific Inc, Highlands Ranch, CO) is a new technique allowing measurement of esophageal volume refluxate. Both techniques assess the role of nonacidic esophageal reflux. Despite their novel approach in assessing nonacid reflux, both methods have limitations. Future studies in this area, however, will prove beneficial in identifying their role in diagnosis and management of patients with suspected nonacid reflux disease.

Duodenogastro-oesophageal reflux

The role of duodenogastro-oesophageal reflux (DGOR), once erroneously termed 'bile reflux', in causing oesophageal mucosal damage has been an area of interest in both animal and human studies. However, due to the lack of appropriate techniques for accurately measuring DGOR, extrapolation of findings from animal studies to humans was difficult to make. The recent advent of the Bilitec system, an ambulatory bilirubin monitoring device, is increasing our knowledge of the specific role of DGOR in oesophageal diseases. Studies suggest that the DGOR without acid reflux may result in symptoms but unless acid reflux is present simultaneously, it does not cause oesophagitis. Therefore, our therapies should aim at reducing both DGOR and acid reflux. Studies show that this may be accomplished by anti-reflux surgery or the use of proton pump inhibitors, which, by reducing gastric volume, decrease the damaging potential of both acid and DGOR.

Effect of cisapride on myoelectrical activity of the gastrointestinal tract in the conscious miniature pig

In conscious miniature pigs with electrodes implanted in the wall of the antrum pylori, duodenum, jejunum, ileum and caecum, the influence of intravenous injection of cisapride, 0.5 and 1 mg/kg, on gastrointestinal myoelectrical activity, was examined. Cisapride, 1 mg/kg, induced a delayed and sustained increase in antral myoelectrical activity. The studied intestinal segments were rather insensitive to the stimulating effect of the benzamide, since only the jejunum and the caecum revealed an increase in myoelectrical activity with the higher dose studied.