EEG alterations in patients treated with clozapine in relation to plasma levels

[Safety aspects during treatment with clozapine: : Adverse effects, titration, and therapeutic drug monitoring - a narrative review]

BACKGROUND

According to current guidelines, clozapine should be used as a third step in treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS). In everyday clinical practice, however, it is frequently used at a much later stage, which leads to a significant deterioration of prognosis. The first part of this narrative overview focuses on the most frequent side effects of clozapine, on the relevance of slow titration, and on specific aspects of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Medline, the Guideline for the use of clozapine 2013 of the Netherlands Clozapine Collaboration Group, and the S3 Guideline for Schizophrenia of the German Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics were searched for relevant literature, the last query dating from April 28th, 2023.

RESULTS

Despite its unique efficacy clozapine is underused in clinical practice and prescription varies between and within countries. Next to hematological, metabolic, and vegetative side effects, clozapine induced inflammation manifesting in the form of pneumonia or myocarditis, which is mainly associated with rapid titration, represents a major clinical challenge with CRP monitoring being of particular relevance. In this context, it also has to be noted that sex, smoking behavior, and ethnic origin impact clozapine metabolism, thus requiring personalized dosing.

CONCLUSION

Slow titration when possible, TDM, and CYP diagnostics when appropriate increase patient safety during treatment with clozapine and thus the likelihood of early prescription of this compound in TRS.

Adverse Drug Reactions in Relation to Clozapine Plasma Levels: A Systematic Review

Clozapine is the gold standard for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Serious and even life-threatening adverse effects, mostly granulocytopenia, myocarditis, and constipation, are of great clinical concern and constitute a barrier to prescribing clozapine, thus depriving many eligible patients of a lifesaving treatment option. Interestingly, clozapine presents variable pharmacokinetics affected by numerous parameters, leading to significant inter- and intra-individual variation. Therefore, therapeutic drug monitoring of plasma clozapine levels confers a significant benefit in everyday clinical practice by increasing the confidence of the prescribing doctor to the drug and the adherence of the patient to the treatment, mainly by ensuring effective treatment and limited dose-related side effects. In the present systematic review, we aimed at identifying how a full range of adverse effects relates to plasma clozapine levels, using the Jadad grading system for assessing the quality of the available clinical evidence. Our findings indicate that EEG slowing, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, heart rate variability, hyperinsulinemia, metabolic syndrome, and constipation correlate to plasma clozapine levels, whereas QTc, myocarditis, sudden death, leucopenia, neutropenia, sialorrhea, are rather unrelated. Rapid dose escalation at the initiation of treatment might contribute to the emergence of myocarditis, or leucopenia. Strategies for managing adverse effects are different in these conditions and are discussed accordingly.

Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Clozapine: Clinically Relevant Interactions and Considerations

The monoamine hypothesis of depression attributes the symptoms of major depressive disorders to imbalances of serotonin, noradrenaline, and dopamine in the limbic areas of the brain. The preferential targeting of serotonin receptor (SERT) by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) has offered an opportunity to reduce the range of these side effects and improve patient adherence to pharmacotherapy. Clozapine remains an effective drug against treatment-resistant schizophrenia, defined as failing treatment with at least two different antipsychotic medications. Patients with schizophrenia who display a constellation of negative symptoms respond poorly to antipsychotic monotherapy. Negative symptoms include the diminution of motivation, interest, or expression. Conversely to the depressive symptomology of interest presently, supplementation of antipsychotics with SSRIs in schizophrenic patients with negative symptoms lead to synergistic improvements in the function of these patients. Fluvoxamine is one of the most potent inhibitors of CYP1A2 and can lead to an increase in clozapine levels. Similar increases in serum clozapine were detected in two patients taking sertraline. However, studies have been contradictory as well, showing no such increases, which are worrying. Clinicians should be aware that clozapine levels should be monitored with any coadministration with SSRIs.

Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model for clozapine in Korean patients with schizophrenia

Clozapine has been used as a treatment of schizophrenia. Despite its large interindividual variability, few reports addressed the physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation (PBPK M&S) of clozapine in patients. This study aimed to develop a PBPK M&S of clozapine in Korean patients with schizophrenia. PBPK modeling for clozapine was constructed using a population-based PBPK platform, the SimCYP^® Simulator (V19; Certara, Sheffield, UK). The PBPK model was developed by optimizing the physiological parameters of the built-in population and compound libraries in the SimCYP^® Simulator. The model verification was performed with the predicted/observed ratio for pharmacokinetic parameters and visual predictive checks (VPCs) plot. Simulations were performed to predict toxicities according to dosing regimens. From published data, 230 virtual trials were simulated for each dosing regimen. The predicted/observed ratio for the area under the curve and peak plasma concentration was calculated to be from 0.78 to 1.34. The observation profiles were within the 5th and 95th percentile range with no serious model misspecification through the VPC plot. A significant impact on age and gender was found for clozapine clearance. The simulation results suggested that 150 mg twice a day and 150 mg three times a day of clozapine have toxicity concerns. In conclusion, a PBPK model was developed and reasonable parameters were made from the data of Korean patients with schizophrenia. The provided model might be used to predict the pharmacokinetics of clozapine and assist dose adjustment in clinical settings.

Comprehensive assessment of exposure to clozapine in association with side effects among patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a population pharmacokinetic study

BACKGROUND

There have been scarce data on the distribution of clozapine concentrations in comparison with the recommended range (350-600 ng/ml) or their relationship with side effects among patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Furthermore, no studies have assessed the association between side effects and overall exposure to the drug by calculating the 24-h area-under-curve (AUC).

METHODS

In- and outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (ICD-10) who were receiving a stable dose of clozapine for ⩾2 weeks were included. Side effects were assessed using the Glasgow antipsychotic side-effects scale for clozapine (GASS-C). Using two collected plasma samples, plasma clozapine and norclozapine concentrations at peak and trough and their 24-h AUC were estimated using population pharmacokinetic models.

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients completed the study (mean ± SD age, 43.0 ± 10.1 years; clozapine dose, 357.5 ± 136.9 mg/day); 33 patients (30.6%) showed estimated trough concentrations of clozapine within the recommended range (350-600 ng/ml) whereas the concentrations were higher and lower than this range among 37 (43.5%) and 28 (25.9%) patients (%), respectively. There were no significant correlations between estimated peak or trough concentrations or 24-h AUC of both clozapine or norclozapine, and GASS-C total or individual scores. No significant differences were found between GASS-C total or individual item scores between the patients with estimated trough concentrations of clozapine of >600 ng/ml and the other subjects.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that clozapine or norclozapine concentrations are not linked directly to the extent of side effects experienced in clozapine-treated patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia while the cross-sectional study design limits the interpretation of any causal relationships. These findings indicate that side effects associated with clozapine may occur at any dose or concentration.

A Working Hypothesis Regarding Identical Pathomechanisms between Clinical Efficacy and Adverse Reaction of Clozapine via the Activation of Connexin43

Clozapine (CLZ) is an approved antipsychotic agent for the medication of treatment-resistant schizophrenia but is also well known as one of the most toxic antipsychotics. Recently, the World Health Organization’s (WHO) global database (VigiBase) reported the relative lethality of severe adverse reactions of CLZ. Agranulocytosis is the most famous adverse CLZ reaction but is of lesser lethality compared with the other adverse drug reactions of CLZ. Unexpectedly, VigiBase indicated that the prevalence and relative lethality of pneumonia, cardiotoxicity, and seizures associated with CLZ were more serious than that of agranulocytosis. Therefore, haematological monitoring in CLZ patients monitoring system provided success in the prevention of lethal adverse events from CLZ-induced agranulocytosis. Hereafter, psychiatrists must amend the CLZ patients monitoring system to protect patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia from severe adverse CLZ reactions, such as pneumonia, cardiotoxicity, and seizures, according to the clinical evidence and pathophysiology. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of clinical efficacy and the adverse reactions of CLZ based on the accumulating pharmacodynamic findings of CLZ, including tripartite synaptic transmission, and we propose suggestions for amending the monitoring and medication of adverse CLZ reactions associated with pneumonia, cardiotoxicity, and seizures.

Bupropion With Clozapine: Case Reports of Seizure After Coadministration

BACKGROUND

Clozapine is more effective than other atypical antipsychotics for treatment resistant schizophrenia, but has serious side effects. Clozapine has an estimated cumulative seizure risk of 10% in patients treated for 3.8 years. Bupropion can also induce seizures and its estimated risk is 0.4% at recommended doses. While some risk factors for seizures are known, much remains unknown about predicting seizure risk. Cases: We present 2 cases of seizures in patients treated with clozapine and bupropion without a seizure history. In the first case, a patient with schizoaffective disorder treated with dual antipsychotic therapy had a witnessed generalized tonic-clonic seizure. With the exception of bupropion/naltrexone which was started 2.5 months prior for weight loss, she had not had any recent medication changes. In the second case, a patient with schizoaffective disorder was treated with clozapine and was prescribed bupropion SR for smoking cessation for an extended duration. He had cut back on cigarette use in the 2 months prior to reporting "spells." The neurologist's assessment was probable epileptic seizures which resolved after the bupropion was stopped and divalproex was started for seizure prophylaxis.

CONCLUSION

Clozapine and bupropion are known to lower the seizure threshold, but little information is available regarding the risk when used in combination. It is unclear whether these agents, when used in combination, have additive seizure risk or possible synergistic effects. Bupropion should be used cautiously in patients treated with clozapine. Safer agents that do not lower the seizure threshold should be utilized whenever possible.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Clozapine: A Systematic Review

Background and Objective

Clozapine is a second-generation antipsychotic drug that is considered the most effective treatment for refractory schizophrenia. Several clozapine population pharmacokinetic models have been introduced in the last decades. Thus, a systematic review was performed (i) to compare published pharmacokinetics models and (ii) to summarize and explore identified covariates influencing the clozapine pharmacokinetics models.

Methods

A search of publications for population pharmacokinetic analyses of clozapine either in healthy volunteers or patients from inception to April 2019 was conducted in PubMed and SCOPUS databases. Reviews, methodology articles, in vitro and animal studies, and noncompartmental analysis were excluded.

Results

Twelve studies were included in this review. Clozapine pharmacokinetics was described as one-compartment with first-order absorption and elimination in most of the studies. Significant interindividual variations of clozapine pharmacokinetic parameters were found in most of the included studies. Age, sex, smoking status, and cytochrome P450 1A2 were found to be the most common identified covariates affecting these parameters. External validation was only performed in one study to determine the predictive performance of the models.

Conclusions

Large pharmacokinetic variability remains despite the inclusion of several covariates. This can be improved by including other potential factors such as genetic polymorphisms, metabolic factors, and significant drug-drug interactions in a well-designed population pharmacokinetic model in the future, taking into account the incorporation of larger sample size and more stringent sampling strategy. External validation should also be performed to the previously published models to compare their predictive performances.

Association between electroencephalogram changes and plasma clozapine levels in clozapine-treated patients

This retrospective observational study was performed to investigate electroencephalogram abnormalities in clozapine-treated patients with refractory schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. The electroencephalogram and plasma clozapine and norclozapine levels in 71 patients were measured on the same day. Fifty-nine patients (85.9%) had a diagnosis of schizophrenia, and 12 patients (14.1%) had a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. The mean daily clozapine dose was 242.9 ± 105.5 mg (range 25-500 mg), and the mean plasma clozapine and norclozapine levels were 429.4 ± 264.1 and 197.8 ± 132.6 ng/ml, respectively. Twenty-five patients (35.2%) were taking valproate in combination with clozapine. electroencephalogram abnormalities were found in 51 (71.8%) patients. No patient reported clinical seizures. Plasma clozapine level was significantly associated with electroencephalogram abnormalities and was identified as a significant predictor of electroencephalogram abnormalities in a logistic regression analysis. The plasma norclozapine levels of patients taking both clozapine and valproic acid were significantly lower than those of patients treated with clozapine alone. These results demonstrate that electroencephalogram abnormalities are closely correlated with plasma clozapine levels. Valproate reduced plasma norclozapine levels. Simultaneous monitoring of electroencephalogram and plasma clozapine levels was useful for adjusting clozapine doses, improving clinical efficacy, and preventing the side effects of clozapine treatment.

Electroencephalogram Modifications Associated With Atypical Strict Antipsychotic Monotherapies

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotics produce electroencephalogram (EEG) modifications and increase the risk of epileptic seizure. These modifications remain sparsely studied specifically for atypical antipsychotics. In this context, our study focuses on EEG modifications associated with atypical strict antipsychotic monotherapies.

METHODS

Electroencephalogram recordings of 84 psychiatric patients treated with atypical antipsychotics in strict monotherapy (clozapine, n = 22; aripiprazole, n = 22; olanzapine, n = 17; risperidone, n = 9; quetiapine, n = 8; risperidone long-acting injection, n = 4; and paliperidone long-acting injection, n = 2) were analyzed. The modifications were ranked according to both slowing and excitability scores.

RESULTS

Electroencephalogram modifications (in 51 subjects, 60.71%) were graded according to 4 stages combining general slowing and sharp slow waves and/or epileptiform activities. The presence of sharp or epileptiform activities was significantly greater for clozapine (90.9%) compared with other second-generation antipsychotics (aripiprazole, 50%; olanzapine, 58.8%; quetiapine, 37.5%; risperidone, 44.4%). Age, duration of disease progression, and diagnosis were not associated as risk factors. Electroencephalogram modifications were associated with lower doses for treatment with quetiapine but not for specific antipsychotics. Electroencephalogram modifications and severe excitability were associated with higher chlorpromazine equivalent doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Atypical antipsychotics (clozapine, aripiprazole, quetiapine, olanzapine, and risperidone) induce EEG modifications, and these are significantly greater for clozapine and appear dependent on chlorpromazine equivalent dose. No encephalopathy was observed in these antipsychotic monotherapies, whatever dose.

Relationship between Clozapine-Induced Electroencephalogram Abnormalities and Serum Concentration of Clozapine in Japanese Patients with Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between the serum concentration of clozapine (C-CLZ), Ndesmethylclozapine (N-CLZ) and the daily dose of CLZ (D-CLZ), and the relationships among CLZ and electroencephalogram (EEG) abnormalities.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients were recruited to this study, but 8 patients were excluded because clozapine was discontinued before the post-treatment measurement of EEG or C-CLZ. Ultimately, 20 patients (6 men, 14 women) with an average age of 36 years were enrolled. The subjects were divided into EEG normal and abnormal groups. C-CLZ and N-CLZ were measured at 4, 12, 26, and 52 weeks after initiating CLZ administration.

RESULTS

All patients had normal baseline EEG signals, and 8 patients showed EEG abnormalities later. There were significant correlations between C-CLZ and D-CLZ, and between N-CLZ and D-CLZ. The C-CLZ/D-CLZ, N-CLZ/D-CLZ, and C-CLZ/N-CLZ ratio were not significantly different between the EEG normal and EEG abnormal groups. The EEG abnormal group had significant higher proportion of patients with high intra-individual variability in their C-CLZ/D-CLZ ratio.

CONCLUSION

There is no relationship between C-CLZ and EEG abnormalities. However, patients with high intra-individual variability in their C-CLZ/D-CLZ ratio had greater possibility of exhibiting EEG abnormalities.

The use of clozapine plasma levels in optimising therapy

Clozapine is well known to be an effective treatment for neuroleptic-resistant schizophrenia. However, its use is complicated by a variable and delayed response and by a range of troublesome adverse effects. Current practice is usually to increase the dose initially to around 450 mg/day and then by small increments to a maximum of 900 mg/day according to response and tolerability. While this method is often successful, it has been suggested that a better way of optimising the dose of clozapine might be to monitor plasma concentrations of the drug.

Clozapine Monitoring in Clinical Practice: Beyond the Mandatory Requirement

Clozapine is effective in treatment resistant schizophrenia; however, it is underutilised probably because of its side effects. The side effects are also the potential reasons for clozapine discontinuation. A mandatory requirement for its use is regular monitoring of white blood cell count and absolute neutrophil count. However there are many side effects that need monitoring in clinical practice considering their seriousness. This article tries to summarise the clinical concerns surrounding the serious side effects of clozapine some of which are associated with fatalities and presents a comprehensive way to monitor patients on clozapine in clinical practice. It emphasizes the need to broaden the monitoring beyond the mandatory investigations. This may help in improving the safety in clinical practice and increasing clinician confidence for greater and appropriate use of this effective intervention.

Seizure associated with clozapine: incidence, etiology, and management

Seizures are a known adverse effect of clozapine therapy. The literature varies on incidence rates of seizures, secondary to varying time frames in which each seizure occurred. Tonic-clonic seizures comprise the majority of seizures experienced secondary to clozapine use, but it is imperative to recognize the potential variety of seizure presentation. The exact etiology of clozapine-induced seizure is unknown. Conflicting reports regarding total oral dose, serum concentration, dose titration, and concomitant medications make it difficult to identify a single cause contributing to seizure risk. Following seizure occurrence, it may be in the best interests of the patient to continue clozapine treatment. In this clinical situation, the use of an antiepileptic drug (AED) for seizure prophylaxis may be required. The AED of choice appears to be valproate, but several successful case reports also support the use of lamotrigine, gabapentin and topiramate. Well-designed clinical trials regarding clozapine seizure prophylaxis are lacking. Given clozapine's strong evidence for efficacy in the treatment of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder, every attempt to manage side effects, including seizure, should be implemented to allow for therapeutic continuation.

Clozapine response and pre-treatment EEG-is there some kind of relationship

BACKGROUND

Clozapine has been used widely in the management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The present study aims at determining whether pre-treatment electroencephalography (EEG) abnormalities would serve as a marker for response to clozapine treatment.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study done in a tertiary care center in Mumbai where patients diagnosed with schizophrenia using DSM-IV criteria and resistant schizophrenia using Kane criteria were assessed using EEG prior to starting clozapine treatment. They were rated for symptomatic improvement using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) along with Clinical Global Improvement for Severity (CGI-S). The results were statistically analysed and presented.

RESULTS

55 out of the 80 patients in the study showed baseline EEG abnormalities. The mean duration of illness in the patients were 2.65 years. Slow wave and background EEG abnormalities were common in pre-treatment EEG. 36.4% patients in the study showed clinical response. Patients with negative symptoms and baseline EEG abnormalities showed better response.

CONCLUSIONS

The study was circumscribed and had many limitations due to a small sample size. The relation between pre-treatment EEG abnormalities and clozapine response could not be statistically correlated and it could not be ascertained to be a marker for response to clozapine therapy.

Clozapine-induced seizures, electroencephalography abnormalities, and clinical responses in Japanese patients with schizophrenia

PURPOSE

We describe electroencephalography (EEG) abnormalities and seizures associated with clozapine treatment in Japanese patients with schizophrenia and retrospectively compare EEG results and total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS [T]) scores before and after treatment.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia were enrolled in this study. EEG measurements were obtained prior to clozapine treatment and every 4 weeks thereafter. EEG measurements were also obtained at the time of seizure. After seizures or EEG abnormalities were noted, additional EEGs were performed every 2 weeks. PANSS (T) scores were used to determine clozapine treatment outcome.

RESULTS

All 26 patients had normal baseline EEG measurements, and ten patients (38.5%) later manifested EEG abnormalities. The mean age was significantly lower than in the abnormal EEG group. Six patients (23.1%) experienced seizures. The mean dose of clozapine at the first occurrence of seizure was 383.3 mg/day. Five of six patients who experienced seizures in this study were successfully treated with valproate or lamotrigine without discontinuation of clozapine. The one patient who continued to experience seizures was successfully treated without antiepileptic drugs. The mean baseline PANSS (T) scores were not significantly different between the normal and abnormal EEG groups, but the mean score in the abnormal EEG group was significantly lower than that in the normal EEG group at the final follow-up (P=0.02).

CONCLUSION

EEG abnormalities may appear in younger patients, and our findings indicate that there is no need to discontinue clozapine when seizures occur. EEG abnormalities that appeared after clozapine treatment were associated with a good clinical response.

Clozapine and therapeutic drug monitoring: is there sufficient evidence for an upper threshold?

RATIONALE

Clozapine levels are advocated in the monitoring of patients on this drug and have now been used for a number of years. A safety-related threshold has also been proposed, as well as therapeutic lower and upper thresholds. While there has been reasonable consensus regarding a lower therapeutic threshold, this is not the case for the upper thresholds.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to review available evidence related to upper thresholds.

METHODS

We carried out an electronic search of different databases and a manual search of articles between 1960 and 2011, cross-referencing the following terms with clozapine-interactions, monitoring, pharmacokinetics, plasma levels, serum levels, and toxicity.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine articles met our search criteria and these could be divided into reviews (11), studies (24), and case reports (35). Study quality was evaluated, and none met criteria for a prospective, randomized controlled trial specifically addressing higher plasma levels, e.g., >500 ng/ml. Case reports emphasize in particular the impact of interactions, e.g., antidepressants and smoking. There is clear evidence indicating a dose-related increased risk of seizures, at least to 500-600 mg/day, but a lack of data to suggest such a relationship between plasma levels, dose, and side effects linked to safety, e.g., seizures, myocarditis, and agranulocytosis. The very limited evidence addressing an upper threshold related to clinical response suggests a "ceiling effect" in the range of 600-838 ng/ml.

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that the current safety-related threshold is not supported by evidence. There may be an upper threshold for clinical response, beyond which chance of response falls off, although further studies are warranted.

Age and sex impact clozapine plasma concentrations in inpatients and outpatients with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Although clozapine is primarily used in a younger to mid-life population of patients with psychosis, there are limited data on the clinical pharmacology of clozapine later in life. The objective of this study was to assess the magnitude and variability of plasma concentrations of clozapine and norclozapine across the lifespan in a real-world clinical setting.

DESIGN

A population pharmacokinetic study using nonlinear mixed effect modeling (NONMEM). Age, sex, height, weight, and dosage formulation were covariates.

SETTING

Inpatients and outpatients at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, from 2001 to 2007.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients ranging in ages from 11 to 79 with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and prescribed clozapine (Clozaril).

MEASUREMENTS

A total of 1142 plasma clozapine and norclozapine concentrations (2,284 concentration measurements) from 391 patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder.

RESULTS

A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination best described the data. The population predicted clearance of clozapine for females was 27.1 L/h (SE 11.1%) and 36.7 L/h (SE 9.7%) for males. For norclozapine, clearance in females was 48.6 L/h (SE 10.8%) and 63.1 L/h (SE 9.3%) in males. The only covariates with a significant effect on clearance were age and sex: clearance for both parent and metabolite decreased exponentially with age at least 39 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Decreased clearance of clozapine and norclozapine with age results in increased blood concentrations and, hence, the potential for adverse drug reactions. These findings have particular clinical relevance for the dosing and safety monitoring of clozapine in older adults, highlighting a need for increased vigilance.

Electroencephalographic abnormalities in clozapine-treated patients: a cross-sectional study

The objective of our study was to examine the electroencephalogram (EEG) abnormalities associated with clozapine treatment. It was a cross-sectional study on 87 psychiatric patients on clozapine treatment. 32 channel digital EEG was recorded and analysed visually for abnormalities. EEG abnormalities were observed in 63.2% of patients. Both slowing and epileptiform activities were noted in 41.4% of patients. The EEG abnormalities were not associated with dose or duration of clozapine exposure.

EEG alterations during treatment with olanzapine

The aim of this naturalistic observational study was to investigate EEG alterations in patients under olanzapine treatment with a special regard to olanzapine dose and plasma concentration. Twenty-two in-patients of a psychiatric university ward with the monodiagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia (ICD-10: F20.0), who received a monotherapy of olanzapine were included in this study. All patients had a normal alpha-EEG before drug therapy, and did not suffer from brain-organic dysfunctions, as verified by clinical examination and cMRI scans. EEG and olanzapine plasma levels were determined under steady-state conditions (between 18 and 22 days after begin of treatment). In 9 patients (40.9%), pathological EEG changes (one with spike-waves) consecutive to olanzapine treatment were observed. The dose of olanzapine was significantly higher in patients with changes of the EEG than in patients without changes (24.4 mg/day (SD: 8.1) vs. 12.7 mg/day (SD: 4.8); T = -4.3, df = 21, P < 0.001). In patients with EEG changes, the blood plasma concentration of olanzapine (45.6 μg/l (SD: 30.9) vs. 26.3 μg/l (SD: 21.6) tended to be also higher. The sensitivity of olanzapine dosage to predict EEG changes was 66.7%, the specificity 100% (Youden-index: 0.67). EEG abnormalities during olanzapine treatment are common. These are significantly dose dependent. Thus, EEG control recordings should be mandatory during olanzapine treatment with special emphasis on dosages exceeding 20 mg per day, although keeping in mind that EEGs have only a limited predictive power regarding future epileptic seizures.

Clozapine-related EEG changes and seizures: dose and plasma-level relationships

Clozapine is a widely used atypical antipsychotic with a unique effectiveness in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. An important adverse effect is seizures, which have been observed at all stages of clozapine treatment. Valproate has traditionally been considered the drug of choice for the prophylaxis of clozapine seizures, however it may not be the most suitable choice for all patients. There is disagreement as to the best point to prescribe valproate or a suitable antiepileptic: as seizure prophylaxis at a certain clozapine dose or level, or only as remedial treatment. In this review, we examine the relevant literature with an aim to evaluate the following relationships: clozapine dose and electroencephalogram (EEG) abnormalities, plasma levels and EEG abnormalities, dose and occurrence of seizures and plasma levels and occurrence of seizures. Weighted linear regression models were fitted to investigate these relationships. There was a strong relationship between clozapine dose and plasma level and occurrence of clozapine-induced EEG abnormalities. However, a statistically significant relationship between dose and occurrence of seizures was not found. A relationship between clozapine plasma level and occurrence of seizures was not established because of the scarcity of useful data although our review found three case reports which suggested that there is a very substantial risk of seizures with clozapine plasma levels exceeding 1300 μg/l. Seizures are more common during the initiation phase of clozapine treatment, suggesting a slow titration to target plasma levels is desirable. An antiepileptic drug should be considered when the clozapine plasma level exceeds 500 μg/l, if the EEG shows clear epileptiform discharges, if seizures, myoclonic jerks or speech difficulties occur and when there is concurrent use of epileptogenic medication. The antiepileptics of choice for the treatment and prophylaxis of clozapine-induced seizures are valproate (particularly where there is mood disturbance) and lamotrigine (where there is resistance to clozapine).

Clozapine exposure and the impact of smoking and gender: a population pharmacokinetic study

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the magnitude and variability of concentration exposure to clozapine and norclozapine in a real-world clinical setting, with a focus on smoking status, using population pharmacokinetic methodologies. A retrospective review of plasma clozapine and norclozapine concentrations taken from inpatients at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, from 2001 to 2007 was conducted. A nonlinear mixed-effects model was developed using NONMEM, including age, gender, weight, smoking status, and dosage formulation as covariates. Pharmacokinetic parameters and interindividual and residual variabilities were estimated with 1- and 2-compartment models. A total of 519 plasma clozapine concentrations from 197 patients (138 males; mean +/- SD age, 38 +/- 13 years; schizophrenia spectrum disorder 98.2%) were included for the analysis. A 1-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination best described the data. Apparent volume of distribution was fixed to a previously reported value in the literature of 7 L/kg.The population-predicted oral clearance of clozapine and norclozapine was 18.0 and 39.0 L/h, respectively; both the predicted clearance values vary nearly 6-fold (range, 9.18-59.06 and 16.29-97.84 L/h, respectively). For clozapine, smokers and males showed increased oral clearance by 6.0 and 4.5 L/h, respectively. For norclozapine, smokers and male gender were associated with an increased oral clearance of 11.3 and 7.6 L/h, respectively. The formulation of clozapine administered had an impact on the absorption rate with a Ka of 0.14/h for tablet and 10.3/h for the suspension form.The data suggest that smoking and male gender are associated with lower exposure to clozapine and norclozapine due to the higher oral clearance. These findings may account for some of the variability in clozapine exposure and have important implications for individualized drug dosing and therapeutic drug monitoring.

Clozapine versus typical neuroleptic medication for schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Long-term drug treatment of schizophrenia with typical antipsychotics has limitations: 25 to 33% of patients have illnesses that are treatment-resistant. Clozapine is an antipsychotic drug, which is claimed to have superior efficacy and to cause fewer motor adverse effects than typical drugs for people with treatment-resistant illnesses. Clozapine carries a significant risk of serious blood disorders, which necessitates mandatory weekly blood monitoring at least during the first months of treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of clozapine compared with typical antipsychotic drugs in people with schizophrenia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

For the current update of this review (March 2006) we searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All relevant randomised clinical trials (RCTs).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted data independently. For dichotomous data we calculated relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis, based on a fixed-effect model. We calculated numbers needed to treat/harm (NNT/NNH) where appropriate. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD) again based on a fixed-effect model.

MAIN RESULTS

We have included 42 trials (3950 participants) in this review. Twenty-eight of the included studies are less than 13 weeks in duration, and, overall, trials were at significant risk of bias. We found no significant difference in the effects of clozapine and typical neuroleptic drugs for broad outcomes such as mortality, ability to work or suitability for discharge at the end of the study. Clinical improvements were seen more frequently in those taking clozapine (n=1119, 14 RCTs, RR 0.72 CI 0.7 to 0.8, NNT 6 CI 5 to 8). Also, participants given clozapine had fewer relapses than those on typical antipsychotic drugs (n=1303, RR 0.62 CI 0.5 to 0.8, NNT 21 CI 15 to 49). BPRS scores showed a greater reduction of symptoms in clozapine-treated patients, (n=1145, 16 RCTs, WMD -4.22 CI -5.4 to -3.1), although the data were heterogeneous (Chi(2) 0.0001, I(2) 66%). Short-term data from the SANS negative symptom scores favoured clozapine (n=196, 5 RCTs, WMD -5.92 CI -7.8 to -4.1). We found clozapine to be more acceptable in long-term treatment than conventional antipsychotic drugs (n=982, 16 RCTs, RR 0.60 CI 0.5 to 0.7, NNT 15 CI 12 to 20). Blood problems occurred more frequently in participants receiving clozapine (3.2%) compared with those given typical antipsychotics (0%) (n=1031, 13 RCTs, RR 7.09 CI 2.0 to 25.6). Clozapine participants experienced more drowsiness, hypersalivation, or temperature increase, than those given conventional neuroleptics. However, clozapine patients experienced fewer motor adverse effects (n=1433, 18 RCTs, RR 0.58 CI 0.5 to 0.7, NNT 5 CI 4 to 6).The clinical effects of clozapine were more pronounced in participants resistant to typical neuroleptics in terms of clinical improvement (n=370, 4 RCTs, RR 0.71 CI 0.6 to 0.8, NNT 4 CI 3 to 6) and symptom reduction. Thirty-four per cent of treatment-resistant participants had a clinical improvement with clozapine treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Clozapine may be more effective in reducing symptoms of schizophrenia, producing clinically meaningful improvements and postponing relapse, than typical antipsychotic drugs - but data are weak and prone to bias. Participants were more satisfied with clozapine treatment than with typical neuroleptic treatment. The clinical effect of clozapine, however, is, at least in the short term, not reflected in measures of global functioning such as ability to leave the hospital and maintain an occupation. The short-term benefits of clozapine have to be weighed against the risk of adverse effects. Within the context of trials, the potentially dangerous white blood cell decline seems to be more frequent in children and adolescents and in the elderly than in young adults or people of middle-age.The existing trials have largely neglected to assess the views of participants and their families on clozapine. More community-based long-term randomised trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of clozapine on global and social functioning as trials in special groups such as people with learning disabilities.

Pharmaco-EEG in psychiatry

In spite of its origins deeply rooted in the discipline, pharmaco-EEG applications in psychiatry remain limited to its achievements in the field of psychotropic drugs classification and, in few instances, discovery. In the present paper two attempts to transfer pharmaco-EEG methods to psychiatric clinical routine will be described: 1) monitoring of psychotropic drug toxicity at the central nervous system level, and 2) prediction of clinical response to treatment with psychotropic drugs. Both applications have been the object of several investigations providing promising and sometimes consistent findings which, however, had no impact on clinical practice. For the first topic, the review is limited to antipsychotics, lithium and recreational drugs, as for other psychotropic drugs mostly case studies are available, while for the response prediction it will include antipsychotics, antidepressants, anxiolytics, psychostimulants and nootropics. In spite of several methodological limitations, pharmaco-EEG studies dealing with monitoring of antipsychotic- and lithium-induced EEG abnormalities went close to, but never became, a clinical routine. EEG studies of recreational drugs are flawed by several limitations, and failed, so far, to identify reliable indices of CNS toxicity to be used in clinical settings. Several QEEG studies on early predictors of treatment response to first generation antipsychotics have produced consistent findings, but had no clinical impact. For other psychotropic drug classes few and inconsistent reports have appeared. Pharmaco-EEG had the potential for important clinical applications, but so far none of them entered clinical routine. The ability to upgrade theories and methods and promote large scale studies represent the future challenge.

Plasma clozapine levels and clinical response in treatment-refractory Chinese schizophrenic patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate clinical efficacy of clozapine in relation with its plasma level in a group of Chinese patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. In addition, the relationship between plasma level and side effects were examined.

METHOD

Fifty-one patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia were put on a fixed dose of clozapine at 300 mg/day for 6 weeks. Non-responders to week 6 received 500 mg/day in subsequent 6 weeks. Responders to week 6 continued to receive 300 mg/day. Clozapine plasma levels were checked at weeks 6 and 12.

FINDINGS

No association was found between clozapine plasma level, response and side effects. Sodium valproate was found to elevate clozapine plasma level while lowering norclozapine/clozapine ratio.

CONCLUSION

Clozapine plasma level was not found to be associated with response and side effect in Chinese treatment-resistant schizophrenic patients. Various explanations were postulated for the lack of relationship observed between clozapine plasma level and response in this population.

Electroencephalogram slowing, sleepiness and treatment response in patients with schizophrenia during olanzapine treatment

Electroencephalogram (EEG) slowing is associated with clozapine side effects, e.g., sedation, and may predict treatment response during clozapine treatment. As olanzapine and clozapine share many pharmacological properties, we investigated whether EEG slowing during olanzapine treatment was related to therapy outcome and sleepiness in patients with schizophrenia. Participants were age- and gender-matched schizophrenic patients treated with olanzapine (n 54), receiving no pharmacological treatment (n 54), or cotreated with olanzapine and some other psychotropic drug (n 38). Their EEG recordings were assessed visually by the same rater blind to clinical data. The EEG scores were categorized using standardized forms. Patients with a poor treatment response did not differ significantly from those with a good response to treatment either in EEG patterns or in frequency of sleepiness. Olanzapine treatment was associated with increased rates of slow (70.4% vs. 22.3%) and sharp waves (22.2% vs. 7.4%), as well as of paroxysmal slow wave discharges (14.8% vs. 1.9%), but did not induce spike- or sharp-slow-wave complexes. Cotreatment with another antipsychotic further increased EEG abnormalities, whereas benzodiazepine administration diminished the olanzapine-induced EEG changes. The results show that olanzapine inducing both slow and sharp waves, as well as paroxysmal discharges, has a strong impact on EEG. However, as no spike- or sharp-slow-wave complexes were observed, the risk of epileptic seizure during olanzapine treatment can be regarded as low, as long as olanzapine is not combined with some other antipsychotic.

Examining concentration-dependent toxicity of clozapine: role of therapeutic drug monitoring

Highly variable plasma concentrations are found in patients receiving the same dose of clozapine. Therefore, rational dose adjustment of clozapine that is guided by therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can improve efficacy while reducing risk of toxicity. As a background to the discussion of the use of TDM for clozapine, the pharmacodynamics and pathways of clozapine biotransformation are first reviewed, in particular the role of the primary enzymes involved. These are CYP1A2, the primary enzyme involved in converting clozapine to norclozapine, and CYP3A4, the primary enzyme involved in converting clozapine to clozapine-N-oxide. The factors that can influence plasma levels of clozapine are next reviewed; these include dose, gender, smoking, age, body weight, caffeine intake, and drug-drug interactions. The authors then examine the concentration-dependent toxicity of clozapine based on a review of published data. Finally, the authors present four cases illustrating the issues involved and how TMD can be used to improve clinical care of patients being treated with clozapine, both in terms of improving efficacy and minimizing potential toxicity.

Predictors and markers of clozapine response

RATIONALE

With other atypical antipsychotics now available, having predictors of clozapine response would be of considerable value, offering clinicians guidance in their decision as to when, and if, a trial of clozapine is warranted.

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to review existing evidence regarding identified predictors and markers of clozapine response.

METHODS

Relevant studies were identified through PUBMED searches (1975-June 2004) and cross-referencing of reviews and included studies. The data were summarized under two main categories: clinical (general, neurological, cognitive/neuropsychological, clozapine levels) and biological (biochemical, endocrine, genetic, metabolic, morphological, dopamine D2 receptor occupancy). 'Reliable' predictors/markers were defined a priori as those with support of at least two independent reports that addressed overall response, with no contradictory findings to date. 'Potential' predictors/markers had the support of a single report that addressed overall response and at least one other evaluating treatment outcome but not directly addressing response status.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Higher baseline clinical symptoms and functioning in the previous years and low cerebrospinal homovanillic acid/5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid levels were identified as reliable. Three potential measures were identified: reduction of frontal cortex metabolic activity, reduction of caudate volume, and improvement in P50 sensory gating.

Toxic rise of clozapine plasma concentrations in relation to inflammation

Recently a small number of patients were observed in two psychiatric hospitals in the Netherlands with clozapine intoxications that complicate or mimic infections. These patients were on chronic medication and normally had stable clozapine blood plasma levels. This article presents four of these cases. Medline was searched for reports of similar cases. A hypothesis was formulated and tested by literature study. Immune modulatory and toxic effects of clozapine protein reactive metabolites or haptens, may play a role in the development of inflammation. Clozapine has a direct influence on different cytokines resembling an inflammatory reaction. Infection or inflammation could induce bioactivation of clozapine into its nitrenium ion that can exert a toxic reaction that induces apoptosis and gives rise to elevated cytokine levels. Clozapine can function as a hapten and induce an IgG, IgM or IgE mediated hypersensitivity reaction. The cytokines released during infection or inflammation downregulate the clozapine metabolism in the P450 system through CYP 1A2. Clozapine plasma levels should be monitored closely if an inflammatory or infectious process is suspected.

Serum level of clozapine and relapse

The case of a young female patient is reported who was diagnosed as having her first manifestation of a paranoid schizophrenic psychosis and who was treated, mainly with clozapine, at the university psychiatric clinic for 3 years, i.e. subsequent episodes are included. Serum levels of clozapine were measured 29 times. Thus, a rather narrow-meshed schedule of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of clozapine was applied. It was found that relapses occurred repeatedly at low serum levels of 48, 109, and 138 ng/mL because of noncompliance by the patient during outpatient treatment, and also because the dose was lowered too hastily after partial response during inpatient treatment. Intoxication was evident at a high serum level of clozapine of 1158 ng/mL during a trial with a dose of 800 mg/d, although moderate serum levels had been found at the same dose some months before. It is concluded that TDM should be considered as being an adjunct to the treatment of schizophrenic and schizoaffective patients with clozapine, not only during inpatient treatment, but also during maintenance outpatient treatment.

A retrospective study of clozapine and electroencephalographic abnormalities in schizophrenic patients

This study investigated the incidence and nature of clozapine-associated electroencephalographic (EEG) abnormalities and the relationship between EEG abnormality and clozapine dosage in Korean schizophrenic patients. Fifty schizophrenic patients with normal baseline EEG and with additional EEG record examined during clozapine treatment more than once were included. Thirty-one patients (62%) showed abnormal EEGs after clozapine treatment, and two of them had seizures. The majority of EEG abnormalities presented as nonspecific slow waves (SW). Spikes (or spike and wave complexes; SP) and frontal intermittent rhythmic delta activity (FIRDA) were relatively rarely observed. The probability of EEG abnormality was linearly dependent on the daily dose of clozapine and patient's age. Our results can be summarized as follows: (1) a substantial proportion of Korean patients treated with clozapine develops EEG abnormalities, and its incidence is comparable to the published results in Caucasian patients; (2) EEG abnormalities occurred in a dose-dependent manner; and (3) the occurrence of EEG abnormalities did not necessarily lead to future seizure development, except in a small number of cases.

Quantitative EEG in schizophrenia and in response to acute and chronic clozapine treatment

Topographic quantitative electroencephalographic (EEG) power and frequency indices were collected in 17 treatment refractory, DSM-III diagnosed schizophrenic patients, before and after acute (single dose) and chronic (six weeks) clozapine treatment, as well as in 17 healthy volunteers. Prior to treatment, patients exhibited greater overall absolute theta power, slower mean alpha frequency and elevated absolute delta and total power in anterior regions. Acute dosing increased total spectrum power globally, slow wave power posteriorally, mean alpha frequency and beta power anteriorally and decreased alpha power posteriorally. Six weeks of clozapine treatment significantly reduced clinical ratings of positive and negative symptoms as well as symptoms of global psychopathology. Chronic treatment resulted in EEG slowing as shown by decreases in relative alpha power, mean beta/total spectrum frequency and by widespread increases in absolute total and delta/theta power. The preliminary findings suggest that brain electric profiling may be a promising tool for assessing and understanding the central impact of pharmacotherapeutic interventions in schizophrenia.

Tolerability of atypical antipsychotics

Atypical antipsychotics are expected to be better tolerated than older antipsychotics because of their lower propensity to cause certain adverse effects. All atypical drugs have been shown to cause fewer acute extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) than a standard typical agent (usually haloperidol) and some (clozapine, sertindole and quetiapine) appear to cause these effects no more often than placebo. In the longer term, clozapine, olanzapine and (less robustly) other atypical antipsychotics are thought to cause less tardive dyskinesia than typical antipsychotics. Problems caused by hyperprolactinaemia occur less often with some atypical antipsychotics than with typical drugs although risperidone and amisulpride appear to have no advantages in this respect. Other adverse effects may occur as frequently with some atypical antipsychotics as with some typical drugs. Clozapine, risperidone and quetiapine are known to cause postural hypotension; clozapine, olanzapine and quetiapine are clearly sedative; and anticholinergic effects are commonly seen with clozapine, and, much less frequently, with olanzapine. Some adverse effects are more frequent with atypical drugs. Idiosyncratic effects seem particularly troublesome with clozapine and, to a lesser extent, sertindole, olanzapine and zotepine. Bodyweight gain is probably more problematic with atypical antipsychotics than with typical drugs. Overall tolerability, as judged by withdrawals from therapy, is not clearly proven to be better with atypical drugs, although some individual trials do indicate an advantage with atypical agents. Differences in tolerability between individual atypical antipsychotics have not been clearly shown. The tolerability profile of atypical drugs certainly benefits from a lower incidence of acute EPS effects, along with less certain or less uniform benefits in symptomatic hyperprolactinaemia or tardive dyskinesia. Other, perhaps more trivial, adverse effects militate against their good tolerability, and effects such as bodyweight gain may severely reduce tolerability. Without clear advantages in tolerability in patient groups used in trials, drug choice in regard to adverse effects should continue to be on a patient to patient basis.

Clozapine versus typical neuroleptic medication for schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Long-term drug treatment of schizophrenia with conventional antipsychotics has limitations: 25-33% of patients have illnesses that are treatment-resistant. Clozapine is an atypical antipsychotic drug, which is claimed to have superior efficacy and to cause fewer motor adverse effects than typical drugs for people with treatment-resistant illnesses. Clozapine carries a significant risk of serious blood disorders, which necessitates mandatory weekly blood monitoring at least during the first months of treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of clozapine for schizophrenia in comparison to typical antipsychotic drugs.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Publications in all languages were searched from the following databases: Biological Abstracts (1982-1999), The Cochrane Library CENTRAL (Issue 2, 1999), Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Specialised Register (1999), EMbase (1980-1999), ISI Citation Index, LILACS (1982-1999), MEDLINE (1966-1999), and PsycLIT (1974-1999). Reference list screening of included papers was performed. Authors of recent trials and the manufacturer of clozapine contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials comparing clozapine with typical antipsychotic drugs were included by independent assessment by at least two reviewers.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted independently by at least two reviewers. Authors of trials published since 1980 were contacted for additional and missing data. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of homogeneous dichotomous data were calculated with the Peto method. A random effects model was used for heterogeneous dichotomous data. Where possible the numbers needed to treat (NNT) or needed to harm (NNH) were also calculated. Weighted or standardised means were calculated for continuous data.

MAIN RESULTS

Currently the review includes 31 studies, 26 of which are less than 13 weeks in duration. These studies include 2589 participants, most of whom were men (74%). The average age was 38 years. There was no difference in the effects of clozapine and typical neuroleptic drugs for broad outcomes such as mortality, ability to work or suitability for discharge at end of the study. Clinical improvement was seen more frequently in those taking clozapine (random effects OR 0.4 CI 0.2-0.6, NNT 6) both in the short and the long term. Also, in the short term, participants on clozapine had fewer relapses than those on typical antipsychotic drugs (OR 0.6 CI 0.4-0.8, NNT 20 CI 17-38), and this may be true for long-term treatment as well. Symptom assessment scales showed a greater reduction of symptoms in clozapine-treated patients. Clozapine treatment was more acceptable than low-potency antipsychotics such as chlorpromazine (OR 0.6 CI 0.4-0.9) but did not differ from acceptability of high-potency neuroleptics such as haloperidol (random effects OR 0.8 CI 0.4-1.5). Clozapine was more acceptable in long-term treatment than conventional antipsychotic drugs (random effects OR 0.4 CI 0.2-0.7, NNT 6 CI 3-111). Patients were more satisfied with clozapine treatment (OR 0.5 CI 0.3-0.8, NNT 12 CI 7-37), but they experienced more hypersalivation, temperature increase, and drowsiness than those given conventional neuroleptics. However, clozapine patients experience fewer motor side effects and less dry mouth. The clinical efficacy of clozapine was more pronounced in participants resistant to typical neuroleptics in terms of clinical improvement (random effects OR 0.2 CI 0.1-0.5, NNT 5 CI 4-7) and symptom reduction. Thirty-two percent of treatment resistant people had a clinical improvement with clozapine treatment.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review confirms that clozapine is convincingly more effective than typical antipsychotic drugs in reducing symptoms of schizophrenia, producing clinically meaningful improvements and postponing relapse. Patients were more satisfied with clozapine treatment than with typical neuroleptic treatment. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED

Distribution of clozapine and desmethylclozapine between blood and brain in rats

Desmethylclozapine is the major metabolite of clozapine in serum. Although the metabolite is pharmacologically active in vitro, the occurrence of desmethylclozapine in brain under steady-state conditions and its role for clinical actions of clozapine are unclear. In this study 20 male Sprague-Dawley rats received five oral doses of clozapine 20 mg/kg at 1.5-h intervals. At 0.5, 1, 2 and 5 h after the last administration, at a time four animals were killed for analysis of clozapine and desmethylclozapine concentrations in serum and brain. The treatment yielded steady-state serum concentrations of clozapine that are considered as therapeutically effective in man. Desmethylclozapine concentrations exceeded those of clozapine at 2-5 h after drug application. In brain, drug concentrations were 15.8-fold higher for clozapine than in serum, but only 2.7-fold higher for desmethylclozapine. The brain clozapine concentrations exceeded those of desmethylclozapine by about 3 times. These data indicate that desmethylclozapine is unlikely to play a role for CNS-mediated effects.

Combination treatment with clozapine and paroxetine in schizophrenia: safety and tolerability data from a prospective open clinical trial

Clozapine is a drug with many side effects, some of them with potentially hazardous outcome (e.g. seizures, agranulocytosis), if not carefully monitored. It has been shown that the metabolism of clozapine may be affected by concomitant treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), while there have been reports of improved efficacy on negative symptomatology of clozapine in combination with SSRIs. Therefore, this prospective open clinical trial was performed to investigate the safety and tolerability of the coadministration of clozapine and paroxetine under control of serum concentrations of clozapine and its metabolites and the effect of this combination treatment on psychopathological outcome was evaluated. A total of 14 patients suffering from schizophrenia or schizodepressive disorder with predominant negative symptomatology were included. The duration of the study was at least 6 weeks for each patient. Initial treatment was a monotherapy with clozapine at a daily dose of 2.5 mg/kg weight. After two measurements of serum concentrations of clozapine and metabolites during steady state conditions, an add-on therapy with 20 mg paroxetine was initiated. No concomitant medication was allowed. The main finding of our prospective study was that addition of paroxetine to a monotherapy with clozapine was a well tolerated medication that did not give rise to new clinically relevant side effects. After addition of paroxetine the serum concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites remained virtually constant. The results of the psychopathological measurements indicated a further clinical improvement, although the small open study could not test for efficacy.

Treatment of behavioural disturbances in Parkinson's disease

Behavioural disorders in Parkinson's disease can grossly be subdivided in primary disturbances and those which are related to drug treatment. Depression and anxiety are a common feature in parkinsonian patients. Both occur independently of drug treatment. In general, most current antidepressive and anxiolytic drugs could be administered in Parkinson's disease with the same precautions as in the normal population. However, in single case reports modern serotonin reuptake blockers in Parkinson's disease have been accused to worsen parkinsonian motor condition. Combinations of serotonin reuptake inhibitors with MAO-inhibitors like selegiline should be used with caution. In the case of cognitive decline firstly an underlying depression should be disclosed or if existent be treated. Depression seems to be the single most important factor associated with the severity of dementia and early antidepressant treatment seems to decrease cognitive decline in depressed parkinsonian patients. Anticholinergic medications should be discontinued since they may cause mental side effects. Sleep disorders in Parkinson's disease are mainly caused by nocturnal akinesia, which causes sleep fragmentation or altered dreaming and nightmares, which might be a side-effect of dopaminergic treatment. In the first case the administration of a controlled release preparation of levodopa at bedtime may be indicated. If the sleep disorder is considered to be due to dopaminergic medication, a reduction of long-term acting agents like modern dopamine agonists and controlled-release levodopa should be considered. In severe psychotic states related to drug treatment antiparkinsonian therapy must be carefully analysed and, if possible, reduced. If motor condition worsens and/or psychiatric symptoms do not improve, initiation with "atypical" neuroleptics like clozapine is indicated. The pharmacological and clinical properties of new antipsychotic drugs that can be used in Parkinson's disease are revised.

Pharmacokinetic interactions involving clozapine

BACKGROUND

Metabolism of clozapine is complex and not fully understood. Pharmacokinetic interactions with other drugs have been described but, in some cases, their mechanism is unknown.

METHOD

Published trials and case reports relevant to the human metabolism of clozapine and to suspected pharmacokinetic interactions were reviewed.

RESULTS

Metabolism of clozapine appears to be largely controlled by the function of the hepatic cytochrome p450IA2 (CYPIA2). Compounds which induce CYPIA2 activity (carbamazepine, tobacco smoke) may reduce plasma clozapine levels. Inhibitors of CYPIA2 (caffeine, erythromycin) have the opposite effect. Drugs which inhibit the hepatic cytochrome p4502D6 (CYP2D6) have also been reported to elevate plasma clozapine levels. The mechanism of this interaction is unclear.

CONCLUSIONS

The co-administration of clozapine and compounds reported to alter its metabolism should be avoided where possible. A host of other interactions can be predicted and so caution should be exercised when co-administering drugs which affect the function of CYPIA2 and CYP2D6. The pharmacokinetics of clozapine require further investigation so that its safe use can be assured.

Automated determination of clozapine and major metabolites in serum and urine

Clozapine is an atypical neuroleptic that is increasingly used for the treatment of schizophrenia. An automated method was developed for the routine quantification of clozapine and its major metabolites, N-desmethylclozapine and clozapine N-oxide, in human serum and urine by column switching and online high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. The method included adsorption of clozapine and its metabolites on a cyanopropyl-coated clean-up column (10 microns; 10 mm x 4.0 mm ID), washing interfering serum constituents to waste by deionized water, and, after column switching, separation on C18 ODS Hypersil reversed-phase material (5 microns; 250 mm x 4.6 mm ID). The compounds of interest were separated and eluted in fewer than 20 minutes, using a mobile phase consisting of 37.5 acetonitril:62.5 water, containing 0.4% (vol/vol) tetramethylethylenediamine and adjusted to pH 6.5 with concentrated acetic acid. Ultraviolet-detection was performed at 254 nm. The determinations exhibited linearity between detector signal and drug concentrations in a range from 5 ng/ml to 50 micrograms/ml. As little as 10 ng/ml of clozapine and 20 or 30 ng/ml of the metabolites was quantifiable. Interferences with other psychotropic drugs, serum, or urine constituents were negligible. The automated procedure enables the analysis of clozapine and metabolites in serum or urine in less than 1 hour.

Hepatotoxicity of clozapine

Two hundred thirty-eight patients treated with either haloperidol or clozapine were investigated to shed more light on the incidence and severity of antipsychotic-induced liver enzyme increase. Serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) increase was most frequently seen in both treatment groups. When analyzing the incidence rates for patients with increased liver enzyme values (serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase, SGPT, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase) that were higher than twice the upper limit of the normal range, clozapine-treated patients showed an SGPT increase (37.3%) significantly more frequently than patients treated with haloperidol (16.6%). Both patients with higher clozapine plasma levels and male patients were at a higher risk for an SGPT increase. At least 60% of the increase of the different enzymes remitted within the first 13 weeks of treatment. In general, the authors conclude that clozapine-induced liver enzyme elevation seems to be a common and mostly transient phenomenon.

Clozapine-induced electroencephalogram changes as a function of clozapine serum levels

Specific electroencephalogram (EEG) changes during clozapine therapy were prospectively studied in a cohort of 50 chronic state hospital patients with schizophrenia who were randomly assigned to one of three nonoverlapping clozapine serum level ranges (50-150 ng/mL, 200-300 ng/mL, and 350-450 ng/mL). EEGs were obtained before clozapine was instituted, and after 10 weeks of treatment. Fifty-three percent of patients showed EEG changes during the 10-week study period. We observed three seizures (6%), one in a patient on 900 mg (serum level 320 ng/mL) clozapine, and two in patients with lower clozapine serum levels (200-300 ng/mL) who had prior histories of seizures and inadequate valproate coverage. Thirteen percent of patients developed spikes with no relationship to dose or serum level of clozapine. Fifty-three percent of patients developed slowing on EEG. Compared to plasma levels below 300 ng/mL, a clozapine serum level between 350 and 450 ng/mL led to more frequent and more severe slowing. The EEG slowing correlated with observed sleepiness, although this factor was not sufficient to explain the severity of high-dose effects.

Pharmacokinetics of clozapine and risperidone: a review of recent literature

The current literature describing the pharmacokinetics of the atypical antipsychotics clozapine and risperidone is reviewed, and discussion on the clinical significance of these data is presented. These drugs are well absorbed when taken orally but are poorly bioavailable because of presystemic elimination. They are highly cleared by hepatic metabolism involving specific P450 isozymes. Risperidone elimination produces a potent active metabolite. Neither of the drugs has received extensive study related to drug-drug interactions, but several are potentially important because a purported therapeutic plasma concentration range is proposed for clozapine and a possible curvilinear dose response relationship has been reported for risperidone. The current clinical pharmacokinetic database for these atypical antipsychotics suggests that much can be learned with additional study that would be of value in individualizing their dosage regimens.

Clozapine plasma level monitoring: current status

Plasma level monitoring of clozapine and metabolites may prove beneficial in treating patients who show unusual drug metabolic activity. A threshold plasma level for patients who will respond to this medication is suggested. The interaction of gender, age, smoking, other medication and side effects with plasma clozapine and metabolites are discussed. Plasma level monitoring of clozapine and/or metabolites is recommended in patients who do not respond at usual therapeutic dose, who show untoward side effects at low dose or who are treated with other medications. Finally monitoring of patients who require more than 600 mg/day should be implemented because there is evidence that the incidence of seizures increases significantly above this dosage level. There is some evidence that high plasma clozapine levels are associated with seizures.

Extrapyramidal side effects of clozapine and haloperidol

Neuroleptic-induced extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) were evaluated in 92 patients treated with clozapine for the first time and 59 patients treated with haloperidol followed in a drug monitoring program. Side effects were measured by the Columbia University Rating Scale, the Simpson Dyskinesia Scale and the Hillside Akathisia Scale. The cumulative incidence rate for tremor was found to be 24.4% in the clozapine group and 39.3% in the haloperidol group. This did not amount to a statistically significant group difference. Bradykinesia was observed in 21.8% of the patients treated with clozapine and in 47.7% of the patients of haloperidol (P = 0.011). In the clozapine group the akathisia incidence rate was 5.6%, whereas haloperidol patients showed a higher rate of 31.7% (P = 0.005). Our results show higher incidence rates of tremor and bradykinesia during clozapine treatment than previous studies. We conclude that clozapine is not entirely free of EPS, but they are usually less severe and of a different quality than side effects induced by typical antipsychotics.

Clozapine serum levels and side effects during steady state treatment of schizophrenic patients: a cross-sectional study

Serum clozapine (S-Cloza) and serum desmethyl-clozapine concentrations (S-Descloza) were measured in 30 chronic schizophrenic in- and out-patients on a variable dose regimen. All patients were in steady state with respect to clozapine therapy and in a stable condition with respect to psychotic illness. The 24-h clozapine dose (median with interquartile range in parenthesis) was 350 (228-425) mg/24 h (range 100-700). There was a weak positive correlation between doses and the BPRS total score (r = 0.44, P < 0.05). The median S-Cloza was 1076 (706-1882) nmol/l (range 196-5581 corresponding to 64-1824 ng/ml). The S-Cloza was linearly correlated to dose but with a high interindividual variation at equal doses, e.g. a factor of 8 at 400 mg/24 h, but a low intraindividual variability of 20%. The S-Descloza averaged 77% of the S-Cloza and was highly correlated to S-Cloza (r = 0.90; P < 0.001). The S-Descloza/dose ratio increased with age and duration of treatment. The side effects registered were EEG abnormalities (83%), tachycardia (23%), increased liver enzyme activity (60%), orthostatic hypotension (17%), and moderate leucocytosis (17%). Only EEG changes were correlated to S-Cloza (r = 0.43; P < 0.05). The score values of the UKU Side Effect Scale were weakly (r = 0.36) correlated to S-Cloza. No side effects were correlated to S-Descloza, doses, or treatment duration. The frequency of side effects was higher than in studies using lower mean doses indicating a correlation between doses or S-Cloza and the frequency of side effects. It is concluded that clozapine fulfils the criteria for therapeutic drug monitoring. TDM may contribute to finding the lowest effective dose with the fewest possible side effects.