Discriminative stimulus effects of the 5HT1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT: attenuation by mu but not by kappa opioids

Effect of chronic l-DOPA treatment on 5-HT(1A) receptors in parkinsonian monkey brain

After chronic use of l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (l-DOPA), most Parkinson's disease (PD) patients suffer from its side effects, especially motor complications called l-DOPA-induced dyskinesia (LID). 5-HT(1A) agonists were tested to treat LID but many were reported to worsen parkinsonism. In this study, we evaluated changes in concentration of serotonin and its metabolite 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) and of 5-HT(1A) receptors in control monkeys, 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) monkeys, dyskinetic MPTP monkeys treated chronically with l-DOPA, low dyskinetic MPTP monkeys treated with l-DOPA and drugs of various pharmacological activities: Ro 61-8048 (an inhibitor of kynurenine hydroxylase) or docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and dyskinetic MPTP monkeys treated with l-DOPA+naltrexone (an opioid receptor antagonist). Striatal serotonin concentrations were reduced in MPTP monkeys compared to controls. Higher striatal 5-HIAA/serotonin concentration ratios in l-DOPA-treated monkeys compared to untreated monkeys suggest an intense activity of serotonin axon terminals but this value was similar in dyskinetic and nondyskinetic animals treated with or without adjunct treatment with l-DOPA. As measured by autoradiography with [(3)H]8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propyl) aminotetralin (8-OH-DPAT), a decrease of 5-HT(1A) receptor specific binding was observed in the posterior/dorsal region of the anterior cingulate gyrus and posterior/ventral area of the superior frontal gyrus of MPTP monkeys compared to controls. An increase of 5-HT(1A) receptor specific binding was observed in the hippocampus of MPTP monkeys treated with l-DOPA regardless to their adjunct treatment. Cortical 5-HT(1A) receptor specific binding was increased in the l-DOPA-treated MPTP monkeys alone or with DHA or naltrexone and this increase was prevented in low dyskinetic MPTP monkeys treated with l-DOPA and Ro 61-8048. These results highlight the importance of 5-HT(1A) receptor alterations in treatment of PD with l-DOPA.

Discriminative stimulus effects of serotonin agonists, neutral antagonists, and inverse agonists in pigeons: perspectives on intrinsic efficacy measurements in vivo

RATIONALE

The extended ternary complex theory of receptor function states a ligand can be classified as an inverse agonist, agonist, or neutral antagonist based on its ability to preferentially stabilize the inactive conformation, the active conformation, or to have no preference for conformational state, respectively.

OBJECTIVES

While serotonin(2C) (5-HT(2C)) receptor ligands are classified accordingly in vitro, whether the phenomenon of inverse agonism manifests itself and/or is physiologically relevant in vivo is unknown.

METHODS

Therefore, we tested a range of proposed agonists, neutral antagonists, and inverse agonists with activity at 5-HT(2C) receptors in three groups of pigeons trained to discriminate saline from: 1.0 mg/kg MK212, an agonist; 0.1 mg/kg methysergide, a proposed neutral antagonist; or, 10 mg/kg mianserin, a proposed inverse agonist.

RESULTS

Based on the patterns of substitution, the discriminative stimulus effects of MK212 appear to be mediated through agonist actions and the stimulus effects of methysergide and mianserin appear to be mediated through antagonist actions. Selective 5-HT(2B/2C) inverse agonist SB206,553 (1 mg/kg) blocked the MK212 discriminative stimulus cue and substituted (0.32-10 mg/kg) in both methysergide- and mianserin-trained pigeons, confirming a 5-HT(2C) receptor role in mediating these discriminative stimuli. Inverse agonists and neutral antagonists fully substituted for methysergide. In addition to SB206,553, methysergide (0.032-1.0 mg/kg) and 5-HT(1A) agonist 8-OH-DPAT (0.32-1.0 mg/kg) substituted completely for mianserin suggesting a complex discriminative stimulus profile for this proposed inverse agonist.

CONCLUSIONS

These data and the subsequent analyses suggest that the discriminative cues of MK212, methysergide, and mianserin are different and that the drug discrimination paradigm is a useful functional assay to examine intrinsic efficacy in vivo.

Discriminative stimulus properties of the 5-HT1A receptor agonist BAY x 3702 in the rat

The aminomethylchroman derivative BAY x 3702 (R-(-)-2-¿4-[(chroman-2-ylmethyl)-amino]-butyl¿-1,1-dioxo-benzo[d] isothiazolone HCl) has recently been characterized as a relatively selective, high affinity 5-HT1A receptor agonist with neuroprotective, anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like effects in animal models. It was the aim of the present study to further confirm its receptor binding profile in an in vivo assay. Rats were trained to discriminate BAY x 3702 (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) from vehicle in a standard two-lever fixed ratio 10 food-reinforced procedure. All rats learned the discrimination, the median number of sessions to reach criterion being 38 (range: 22-58 sessions). Generalization tests with BAY x 3702 showed dose-dependent and complete generalization after different routes of administration; the ED50 values being: 0.030, 0.007 and 0.36 mg/kg, after i.p., i.v. and p.o. administration, respectively. Assessment of the duration of action after administration of 0.1 mg/kg BAY x 3702, i.p., resulted in a T1/2 of 65 min. Dose-dependent and complete generalization was also obtained with the 5-HT1A receptor agonists 8-OH-DPAT (8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)-tetralin, ED50 in mg/kg, i.p.: 0.086), flesinoxan (0.30), SR 57746A ((4-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl)-N-(2-(naphth-2-yl)ethyl)-1,2,3,6-tet rahydropyridine HCl, 1.0), the (+)-enantiomer of BAY x 3702 (1.3) and ipsapirone (1.8); the ED50 values being closely correlated with their respective affinities for the 5-HT1A receptor. Pretreatment with the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY-100635 ((N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N(2-pyridinyl) cyclohexane carboxamide trihydrochloride) dose-dependently and completely blocked the discriminative effects of 0.1 mg/kg BAY x 3702 (ID50: 0.013 mg/kg, i.p.). WAY-100635, prazosin, idazoxan, raclopride, paroxetine, (-)-BAY k 8644 (methyl-1,4-dihydro-2,6-dimethyl-3-nitro-4-(2-trifluoro-methyl-phenyl)-p yridine-5-carboxylate), ethanol, and the putative neuroprotectants MK-801 ((+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydroxy-5H-dibenzo(a,d)cyclohepten-5,10-imin e), CNS 1102 (N-(1-naphthyl)-N'-(3-ethylphenyl)-N'-methyl-guanidine), CGS 19755 (cis-4-(phosphonomethyl) piperidine-2-carboxylic acid) and nimodipine did not induce more than 20% generalization. It is concluded that the BAY x 3702 cue is mediated by its agonistic activity at 5-HT1A receptors.

Endogenous opiates: 1995

This article is the eighteenth installment of our annual review of research concerning the opiate system. It includes articles published during 1995 reporting the behavioral effects of the opiate peptides and antagonists, excluding the purely analgesic effects. The specific topics covered this year include stress: tolerance and dependence; eating; drinking; gastrointestinal, renal, and hepatic function; mental illness and mood; learning, memory, and reward; cardiovascular responses; respiration and thermoregulation; seizures and other neurological disorders; electrical-related activity; general activity and locomotion; sex, pregnancy, and development; immunological responses; and other behaviors.