Effects of systemic and regional chemotherapy after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases

Posthepatectomy but not prehepatectomy chemotherapy was associated with a longer time to recurrence in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases: Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM) are treated with surgery alone, surgery and posthepatectomy chemotherapy, or prehepatectomy chemotherapy and surgery. The optimal approach in terms of survival is unclear. We compared survival in the three treatment groups using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis.

METHODS

Data from patients undergoing initial CLM resection in 2005-2018 were obtained from a prospectively maintained database. Our group treated resectable CLM with surgery alone but gradually adopted post- and prehepatectomy chemotherapy for patients with CLM number ≥5 after 2015. IPTW analysis was employed to adjust the characteristics of the three groups.

RESULTS

Of the 439 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 175 underwent surgery alone, 135 underwent surgery and posthepatectomy chemotherapy, and 129 underwent prehepatectomy chemotherapy and surgery. After the IPTW adjustment, the demographic and clinicopathological characteristics were well balanced. The IPTW analysis revealed that the recurrence-free survival was better in patients undergoing surgery and posthepatectomy chemotherapy than in patients undergoing surgery alone (median recurrence-free survival, 1.3 years vs 0.7 years; P = .018). Overall survival was not significantly different between the three treatment approaches.

CONCLUSION

Posthepatectomy but not prehepatectomy chemotherapy prolongs the time to recurrence after curative-intent resection of CLM.

Optimizing Adjuvant Therapy after Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review

The liver is the most common site of colorectal cancer metastatic spread. Although metastasectomy is the gold standard for fit patients with resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLMs), their management after surgical treatment remains controversial. The objective of this systematic review was to collate the currently available data of the agents used in the adjuvant setting in order to define the most optimal therapeutic strategy. A systematic review of the literature was conducted by searching PubMed/Medline and Cochrane library databases. We included studies that evaluated the efficacy, the tolerability and the safety profile of various chemotherapeutic agents that are used as adjuvant treatment after surgical resection of CRLMs. The outcomes of interest were regression-free survival (RFS), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and severe toxicities. From 543 initial articles, 29 publications with 7028 patients were finally included. In general, the results of the eligible studies indicated that adjuvant therapy after resection of CRLMs led to improved RFS/DFS rates, but this benefit did not contribute to a statistically significant prolongation of OS. Moreover, the choice of the therapeutic strategy, namely systematic or regional chemotherapy or the combination of both, did not seem to have a differential impact on patient outcomes. However, these results should be interpreted with caution since the majority of the chosen studies are of low or moderate quality. In this context, further high-quality clinical trials conducted on patient sub-populations with modern therapies are required in order to reduce in-study and between-study heterogeneity and determine which patients are expected to derive the maximum benefit from adjuvant therapy after surgery for CRLMs.

Faster Return to Intended Oncologic Treatment (RIOT) After Trisectionectomy Does Not Translate to Better Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Resection with trisectionectomy may necessitate liver molding for adequate future liver remnant (FLR), and subsequent complications can impact return to intended oncologic therapy (RIOT). This study evaluated whether a difference in RIOT exists with the use of molding and between liver molding techniques (associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy [ALPPS] and portal vein embolization [PVE]) with trisectionectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective review evaluated trisectionectomies for malignancy. Outcomes were compared with and without molding, and RIOT was determined.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients underwent trisectionectomy: 11 ALPPS, 14 PVE, 26 without molding. 73% of ALPPS, 64% of PVE, and 58% without molding achieved RIOT (P = .971). There were no differences found in baseline characteristics, R0 rate, length of stay, readmission, complications, or mortality. Time to RIOT was significantly different (ALPPS: 3.3 months; PVE: 5.2 months; none: 2.4 months, P = .0203). There were no differences in recurrence or survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver molding should not cause apprehension as there are no differences in achieving RIOT. Although technique alters time to RIOT, this does not translate into improved outcomes, implicating disease biology, and regeneration stimulus.

A combination of oral uracil-tegafur plus leucovorin (UFT + LV) is a safe regimen for adjuvant chemotherapy after hepatectomy in patients with colorectal cancer: safety report of the UFT/LV study

The use of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC) is controversial because no trial demonstrated its benefit. We conducted the phase III trial to evaluate UFT/leucovorin (LV) for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). The primary endpoint has not been available until 2014, we first report the feasibility and safety data of UFT/LV arm. In this multicenter trial, patients who underwent curative resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive surgery alone or surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with UFT/LV. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival. Secondary endpoints included overall survival and safety. A total of 180 patients were enrolled, 90 were randomly assigned to receive UFT/LV therapy. Eighty two of whom were included in safety analyses. In the UFT/LV group, the completion rate of UFT/LV was 54.9%, the relative dose intensity was 70.8% and grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 12.2% of the patients. Elevated bilirubin levels, decreased hemoglobin levels, elevated alanine aminotransferase levels, diarrhea, anorexia were common. Most other adverse events were grade 2 or lower and tolerable. In conclusions, UFT/LV is a safe regimen for postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients who have undergone resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Further studies are warranted to improve completion rate, but UFT/LV is found to be a promising treatment in this setting.

Current treatment for colorectal liver metastases

Surgical resection offers the best opportunity for survival in patients with colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver, with five-year survival rates up to 58% in selected cases. However, only a minority are resectable at the time of diagnosis. Continuous research in this field aims at increasing the percentage of patients eligible for resection, refining the indications and contraindications for surgery, and improving overall survival. The use of surgical innovations, such as staged resection, portal vein embolization, and repeat resection has allowed higher resection rates in patients with bilobar disease. The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy allows up to 38% of patients previously considered unresectable to be significantly downstaged and eligible for hepatic resection. Ablative techniques have gained wide acceptance as an adjunct to surgical resection and in the management of patients who are not surgical candidates. Current management of colorectal liver metastases requires a multidisciplinary approach, which should be individualized in each case.

Management of the hepatic lymph nodes during resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Hepatic lymph node involvement is generally considered a contraindication for liver resection performed for colorectal liver metastases. However, some advocate hepatic lymphadenectomy in the presence of macroscopic involvement and others routine lymphadenectomy. The aim of this review is to assess the role of lymphadenectomy in resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Medline, Embase and Central databases were searched using a formal search strategy. Trials with survival data with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were considered for inclusion. Meta-analysis was performed using Revman.

RESULTS

A total of 4230 references were identified. Ten reports of nine studies including 926 patients qualified for the review. The prevalence of nodal metastases after routine lymphadenectomy was 16.3%. The overall 3-year and 5-year survival rates in node-positive patients were 9/151 (11.3%) and 2/137 (1.5%), respectively, compared to 3-year and 5-year survival rates of 424/787 (53.9%) and 246/767 (32.1%) in node-negative patients. The odds ratios for 3-year and 5-year survivals in node positive disease compared to node-negative disease were 0.12 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.24) and 0.08 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.22). There was no randomized controlled trial which assessed the survival benefit of routine or "selective" lymphadenectomy.

CONCLUSION

Currently, there is no evidence of survival benefit for routine or selective lymphadenectomy. Survival rates are low in patients with positive lymph nodes draining the liver irrespective of whether they are detected by routine lymphadenectomy or by macroscopic involvement. Further trials in this patient group are required.

Surgical resection versus non-surgical treatment for hepatic node positive patients with colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Involvement of hepatic lymph node in patients with colorectal liver metastases is associated with poor prognosis.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the benefits and harms of curative liver resection with lymphadenectomy versus other treatments for colorectal liver metastases with hepatic node involvement.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, and LILACS until September 2009 for identifying the randomised trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status) comparing liver resection (alone or in combination with radiofrequency ablation or cryoablation) versus other treatments (neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, chemotherapy, or radiofrequency ablation) in patients with colorectal liver metastases with hepatic node involvement.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently identified trials for inclusion.

MAIN RESULTS

We were unable to identify any randomised clinical trial fulfilling the inclusion criteria of this review. We were also unable to identify any quasi-randomised or cohort studies, which could meaningfully answer this important issue.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence in the literature to assess the role of surgery versus other treatments for patients with colorectal liver metastases with hepatic node involvement. High quality randomised clinical trials are feasible and are necessary to determine the optimal management of patients with colorectal liver metastases with hepatic node involvement.

Synchronous colorectal liver metastases: is it time to reconsider traditional paradigms of management?

BACKGROUND

Patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CLM) are typically treated with initial colorectal resection followed by arbitrary and prolonged courses of chemotherapy. Partial hepatectomy is considered only for patients without interval disease progression. This review describes the rationale for this treatment approach and the recent developments suggesting that this management paradigm should be reconsidered.

RESULTS

Because asymptomatic colorectal cancer often does not lead to complications, and given the potential benefit of chemotherapy in downsizing unresectable to resectable liver disease, most patients with asymptomatic primary tumors and unresectable synchronous CLM should be first treated with chemotherapy. In contrast, initial hepatic resection should be considered for resectable synchronous CLM. Survival benefits from prehepatectomy chemotherapy have not been established. Several reports demonstrate morbidity after hepatic resection from extended durations of irinotecan- and/or oxaliplatin-based prehepatectomy chemotherapy. Although shorter treatment periods may not have these deleterious effects on subsequent hepatic resection, prospective studies reveal that most patients with supposedly aggressive disease with short treatment durations will not be identified. Moreover, a complete radiologic response to prehepatectomy chemotherapy is not only rare but also does not equate with a complete pathological response. Finally, several studies suggest that simultaneous colorectal and minor hepatic resections can performed safely with benefits in total morbidity when compared with traditional staged procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

The traditional treatment paradigm centering on the utility of prehepatectomy chemotherapy for resectable synchronous CLM should be reconsidered. Recent developments underscore the need for prospective randomized controlled trials evaluating the optimal timing of hepatectomy relative to chemotherapy.

Multiagent chemotherapy for isolated colorectal liver metastases: a single-centered retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Few studies identifying variables associated with prognosis after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) account for treatment with multiagent chemotherapy (fluoropyrmidines with irinotecan, oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, and/or cetuximab). The objective of this retrospective study was to determine the effect of multiagent chemotherapy on long-term survival after resection of CLM.

METHODS

Demographics, clinicopathologic tumor characteristics, treatments, and long-term outcomes were reviewed.

RESULTS

From 1996 to 2006, 230 patients underwent resection of CLM. Treatment strategies before and after resection included fluoropyrimidine monotherapy (n = 34 and n = 39), multiagent chemotherapy (n = 81 and n = 73), and observation (n = 115 and n = 118). Prehepatectomy treatment strategy was not associated with overall survival. Actuarial 4-year survival was 63%, 39%, and 40% for patients treated with multiagent chemotherapy, fluoropyrimidine monotherapy, and observation after hepatectomy, p = 0.06. Posthepatectomy multiagent chemotherapy (p = 0.04, HR 0.52 [0.27-1.03]), duration of posthepatectomy chemotherapy treatment of 2 months or longer (p = 0.05, HR 0.49 [0.25-0.99]), carcino-embryonic antigen level >10 ng/mL (p = 0.03, HR 2.09, 95% CI [1.32-3.32]), and node positive primary tumor (p = 0.002, HR 1.79 [1.06-3.02]) were associated with overall survival in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The association of posthepatectomy multiagent chemotherapy with overall survival in this retrospective study indicates the need for prospective randomized trials comparing multiagent chemotherapy and fluoropyrimidine monotherapy for CLM.

Proposal of a new and simple staging system of colorectal liver metastasis

AIM: To create a new, simple and useful staging system for colorectal liver metastasis analogous to the Tumor Node Metastasis classification system of International Union Against Cancer.

METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of 81 consecutive patients who underwent partial hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (group 1). Clinical and pathological features of both primary and metastatic liver cancers were entered into a multivariate analysis to determine independent variables helpful in accurately predicting long-term prognosis after hepatectomy. Using selected variables, we created a new staging system like TNM classification. The usefulness of the new staging system was examined in a series of 92 patients from another hospital (group 2).

RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that 81 patients in group 1 had significant multiple hepatic tumors with the largest tumor being more than 5 cm in diameter, resectable extrahepatic distant metastases, and independent prognostic factors for poor survival after hepatectomy. Using these three variables, we created a new staging system to classify patients with colorectal liver metastases. Finally, our new staging system classified the patients both in group 1 and in group 2.

CONCLUSION: Our new staging system of colorectal liver metastasis is simple and useful for staging patients.

Evolving techniques in the treatment of liver colorectal metastases: role of laparoscopy, radiofrequency ablation, microwave coagulation, hepatic arterial chemotherapy, indications and contraindications for resection, role of transplantation, and timing of chemotherapy

The management of patients who have hepatic metastases from CRC has become increasingly complex as the number of modalities that is available to treat these tumors has increased. Surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment, when possible, and may become an option in an increasing proportion of patients that has advanced disease and previously were considered unresectable when treated with a combination of neoadjuvant systemic or hepatic arterial chemotherapy. The role of microwave coagulation and RFA can be considered only complementary to surgical resection at this point, but they may represent the best option in highly selected patients, such as those who are at high risk for extrahepatic recurrence or who are poor surgical candidates.

Proposal of criteria to select candidates with colorectal liver metastases for hepatic resection: Comparison of our scoring system to the positive number of risk factors

AIM: To select accurately good candidates of hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastasis.

METHODS: Thirteen clinicopathological features, which were recognized only before or during surgery, were selected retrospectively in 81 consecutive patients in one hospital (GroupI). These features were entered into a multivariate analysis to determine independent and significant variables affecting long-term prognosis after hepatectomy. Using selected variables, we created a scoring formula to classify patients with colorectal liver metastases to select good candidates for hepatic resection. The usefulness of the new scoring system was examined in a series of 92 patients from another hospital (Group II), comparing the number of selected variables.

RESULTS: Among 81 patients of GroupI, multivariate analysis, i.e. Cox regression analysis, showed that multiple tumors, the largest tumor greater than 5 cm in diameter, and resectable extrahepatic metastases were significant and independent prognostic factors for poor survival after hepatectomy (P < 0.05). In addition, these three factors: serosa invasion, local lymph node metastases of primary cancers, and post-operative disease free interval less than 1 year including synchronous hepatic metastasis, were not significant, however, they were selected by a stepwise method of Cox regression analysis (0.05 < P < 0.20). Using these six variables, we created a new scoring formula to classify patients with colorectal liver metastases. Finally, our new scoring system not only classified patients in GroupIvery well, but also that in Group II, according to long-term outcomes after hepatic resection. The positive number of these six variables also classified them well.

CONCLUSION: Both, our new scoring system and the positive number of significant prognostic factors are useful to classify patients with colorectal liver metastases in the preoperative selection of good candidates for hepatic resection.

Locoregional strategies for colorectal hepatic metastases

Hepatic colorectal metastases present a challenging problem in patients with recurrent colorectal cancer. Twenty percent of patients with recurrence will have liver metastases as a component of their disease, and only 10% of these patients will have isolated liver metastases that are resectable. Although systemic chemotherapy alone has not proven efficacious in the treatment of liver metastases, a number of options exist in managing these lesions. For those that are resectable, surgery remains the optimal treatment, with an expected 5-year survival rate of 33%-39% based on several large series. Hepatic artery chemotherapy is another adjunct treatment in patients undergoing resection and may further improve survival. This benefit may be even more pronounced when combined with systemic chemotherapy. Newer-generation agents are likely to further improve results. More recently, new therapeutic modalities have been used to treat unresectable lesions. These include hepatic artery chemotherapy and ablative techniques such as radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation. This article will highlight the data regarding hepatic resection for colorectal metastases, describe the rationale for and efficacy of hepatic arterial chemotherapy in the postoperative adjuvant setting and in unresectable liver disease, and review the current literature describing ablative techniques in the treatment of liver metastases.

Surgical treatment of liver metastases

Approximately 50% to 60% of patients with colorectal cancer will develop hepatic metastases during the course of their illness, with 20% to 30% of patients having liver metastases at time of diagnosis. In nearly a quarter of these patients the liver is the only site of disease. Surgical resection of isolated hepatic metastases has been associated with a 27% to 37% 5-year survival and confers a survival advantage compared to patients not undergoing resection. Thorough preoperative and intraoperative evaluation is necessary to select appropriate surgical candidates who may benefit from resection. This article examines criteria useful in patient selection, and also reviews the management of recurrent hepatic metastases and the role of repeat hepatic resection.

Stereotactic single-dose radiation therapy of liver tumors: results of a phase I/II trial

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility and the clinical response of a stereotactic single-dose radiation treatment for liver tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between April 1997 and September 1999, a stereotactic single-dose radiation treatment of 60 liver tumors (four primary tumors, 56 metastases) in 37 patients was performed. Patients were positioned in an individually shaped vacuum pillow. The applied dose was escalated from 14 to 26 Gy (reference point), with the 80% isodose surrounding the planning target volume. Median tumor size was 10 cm(3) (range, 1 to 132 cm(3)). The morbidity, clinical outcome, laboratory findings, and response as seen on computed tomography (CT) scan were evaluated.

RESULTS

Follow-up data could be obtained from 55 treated tumors (35 patients). The median follow-up period was 5.7 months (range, 1.0 to 26.1 months; mean, 9.5 months). The treatment was well tolerated by all patients. There were no major side effects. Fifty-four (98%) of 55 tumors were locally controlled after 6 weeks at the initial follow-up based on the CT findings (22 cases of stable disease, 28 partial responses, and four complete responses). After a dose-escalating and learning phase, the actuarial local tumor control rate was 81% at 18 months after therapy. A total of 12 local failures were observed during follow-up. So far, the longest local tumor control is 26.1 months.

CONCLUSION

Stereotactic single-dose radiation therapy is a feasible method for the treatment of singular inoperable liver metastases with the potential of a high local tumor control rate and low morbidity.

Hepatobiliary surgery

The transformation of liver and biliary tract surgery into a full speciality began with the application of functional anatomy to segmental surgery in the 1950's, reinforced by ultrasound and new imaging techniques. The spectrum of gall-stone disease encountered by the hepatobiliary surgeon has changed with the laparoscopic approach to cholecystectomy. There is increased need for conservation techniques to repair the bile duct injuries that arise more often in the laparoscopic approach to cholecystectomy. These and other surgical interventions on the bile ducts should be selected as a function of risk versus benefit in relation to the patient's requirements and the institutional expertise. Bile duct cancers, including hilar cholangiocarcinoma, and gallbladder cancers have a dismal reputation, but evidence is accumulating for better survivals from aggressive approaches performed by specialist hepatobiliary surgeons. Hepatic surgery has increased in safety and effectiveness, largely due to the segmental approach, but also to experience with techniques for vascular control and exclusion used in liver transplantation. Techniques such as portal vein embolisation, which induces hypertrophy of the future remnant liver, percutaneous local tumour destruction using cryotherapy or radiofrequency tumour coagulation and more effective chemotherapy are beginning to increase the number of patients who can undergo curative resection. In liver transplantation, segmental surgery has been applied to graft reduction and to split liver grafts, and is opening new perspectives for living donor transplantation. Today the limitation to survival in primary and metastatic liver cancer lies not in the surgical technique but in the difficulty of dealing with microscopic and extrahepatic disease. Progress in these fields will enable the hepatobiliary surgeon to further extend the possibilities for proposing curative resections.

[Adjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy after curative resection of liver metastasis from colorectal cancer. Results of a pilot study in 30 patients]

OBJECTIVE

Five-year survival after simple resection of liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma ranges from 20 to 40%. The aim was to study the reliability and long term results of adjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy after resection of colorectal liver metastases.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

From 1991 to 1997, 30 patients after a complete resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer were included (16 men, 14 women, mean age: 62 years). There were 2 stage I, 19 stages II, 2 stages III, 5 stages IV and 2 stages V according to Gayowski staging system. During laparotomy, a catheter was placed in the gastroduodenal artery in order to perfuse the proper hepatic artery. Chemotherapy included 5 Fluorouracil (12 mg/m2) and Leucovorin (200 mg/m2) and was administered once a week during six months. Mean follow-up was 52 months.

RESULTS

Adjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy had to be interrupted before six months in 9 patients because leukopenia (n = 2), infection or obstruction of the catheter (n = 5), duodenal migration of the catheter (n = 1) and occurrence of multiple extrahepatic metastases (n = 1). No death was in relation with the method. Five-year survival rate was 41.8% for the global series. Five-year disease free survival rate was 21.4%. Causes of death were: hepatic recurrence only (n = 3), extrahepatic + hepatic recurrence (n = 4), extrahepatic recurrence (n = 2). Two patients died of another carcinoma (esophagus, ovary), without evidence of recurrence of the colorectal carcinoma. At the present, there is a recurrence in 4 living patients.

CONCLUSION

Although the benefit on survival is not significant, these results suggest a longest time of remission in patients with adjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy. Trials comparing and/or combining this method to intravenous chemotherapy should be proposed in patients after resection of colorectal liver metastases.