Comparison of charges related to radiotherapy for soft-tissue sarcomas treated by preoperative external-beam irradiation versus interstitial implantation

Brachytherapy for Organ and Function Preservation in Soft-Tissue Sarcomas in Adult and Paediatric Patients

Adjuvant radiotherapy is an integral component in the management of soft-tissue sarcomas. Brachytherapy is a very convenient and conformal way of delivering adjuvant radiotherapy in such tumours, which spares the surrounding normal tissue. Randomised studies have established the efficacy of brachytherapy in the adjuvant setting, with a 5-year local control of 80-85%. High dose rate, low dose rate and pulsed dose rate have shown equivalent local control, but high dose rate has gained popularity owing to patient convenience, radiation safety and flexibility in dose optimisation. Freehand insertion perioperative brachytherapy (intraoperative placement and postoperative treatment) is the most commonly used technique in soft-tissue sarcomas, with intraoperative radiotherapy and radioactive seed placement being the less commonly used techniques. Brachytherapy can be used as monotherapy or in combination with external beam radiotherapy, such as in cases of close/positive margins for safe dose escalation. Although the quantum of side-effects with external beam radiotherapy has considerably reduced with the evolution of technology and the introduction of intensity modulation (intensity-modulated radiotherapy), brachytherapy still scores better in terms of dose conformality, especially in recurrent tumours (previously irradiated) and when used to treat paediatric and geriatric patients.

Brachytherapy in the Treatment of Soft-Tissue Sarcomas of the Extremities-A Current Concept and Systematic Review of the Literature

INTRODUCTION

Evidence on the use of brachytherapy in soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) is sparse. Therapy regimens are determined more by local interdisciplinary tumor conferences than by standardized protocols. Patient-specific factors complicate the standardized application of therapy protocols. The individuality of the treatment makes it difficult to compare results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted, whereby the literature from a period of almost 44 years (1977-2021) was graded and included in this systematic review. For this purpose, PubMed was used as the primary database. Search string included "soft-tissue sarcoma", "brachytherapy", and "extremity." Four independent researchers reviewed the literature. Only full-text articles written in English or German were included.

RESULTS

Of the 175 identified studies, 70 were eligible for analysis based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The key points to compare were local complications, recurrence rate and correlation with margins of resection, and the use of brachytherapy regarding tumor grading.

CONCLUSION

Brachytherapy represents an important subset of radiotherapy techniques used in STSs, whose indications and applications are constantly evolving, and for which a local control rate of 50% to 96% has been reported as monotherapy, depending on risk factors. However, the best benefit is seen in the combination of further resection and brachytherapy, and most authors at many other centers agree with this treatment strategy.

American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) consensus statement for soft-tissue sarcoma brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Growing data supports the role of radiation therapy in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Brachytherapy has been used for decades in the management of STS and can be utilized as monotherapy or as a boost to external beam radiation. We present updated guidelines from the American Brachytherapy Society regarding the utilization of brachytherapy in the management of STS.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Members of the American Brachytherapy Society with expertise in STS and STS brachytherapy created an updated clinical practice guideline including step-by-step details for performing STS brachytherapy based on a literature review and clinical experience.

RESULTS

Brachytherapy monotherapy should be considered for lower-recurrence risk patients or after a local recurrence following previous external beam radiation; a brachytherapy boost can be considered in higher-risk patents meeting implant criteria. Multiple dose/fractionation regimens are available, with determination based on tumor location and treatment intent. Techniques to limit wound complications are based on the type of wound closure; wound complication can be mitigated with a delay in the start of brachytherapy with immediate wound closure or by utilizing a staged reconstruction technique, which allows an earlier treatment start with a delayed wound closure.

CONCLUSIONS

These updated guidelines provide clinicians with data on indications for STS brachytherapy as well as guidelines on how to perform and deliver high quality STS brachytherapy safely with minimal toxicity.

Staged reconstruction brachytherapy has lower overall cost in recurrent soft-tissue sarcoma

Purpose

Adjuvant brachytherapy (AB) with immediate (IR) and staged reconstruction (SR) are distinct treatment modalities available for patients with recurrent soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Although SR may offer local control and toxicity benefit, it requires additional upfront procedures, and there is no evidence that it improves overall survival. With the importance of value-based care, our goal is to identify which technique is more cost effective.

Material and methods

A retrospective review of 22 patients with recurrent extremity STS treated with resection followed by AB alone. Hospital charges were used to compare the cost between SR and IR at the time of initial treatment, at 6-month intervals following surgery, and cumulative cost comparisons at 18 months.

Results

Median follow-up was 31 months. Staged reconstruction (n = 12) was associated with an 18-month local control benefit (85% vs. 42%, p = 0.034), compared to IR (n = 10). Staged reconstruction had a longer hospital stay during initial treatment (10 vs. 3 days, p = 0.002), but at 18 months, the total hospital stay was no longer different (11 vs. 11 days). Initially, there was no difference in the cost of SR and IR. With longer follow-up, cost eventually favored SR, which was attributed primarily to the costs associated with local failure (LF). On multivariate analysis, cost of initial treatment was associated with length of hospital stay (~$4.5K per hospital day, p < 0.001), and at 18 months, the cumulative cost was ~175K lower with SR (p = 0.005) and $58K higher with LF (p = 0.02).

Conclusions

In recurrent STS, SR has a longer initial hospital stay when compared to IR. At 18 months, SR had lower rates of LF, translating to lower total costs for the patient. SR is the more cost-effective brachytherapy approach in the treatment of STS, and should be considered as healthcare transitions into value-based medicine.

Diagnosis and management of soft tissue sarcomas

STS are a heterogeneous group of malignant tumors that pose significant management challenges. The cornerstone of therapy for patients who have primary STS remains margin-negative resection. Adjuvant radiotherapy has been shown to reduce the risk of recurrence for extremity and trunk STS, although its role for retroperitoneal STS remains to be defined. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy has some theoretic advantages to postoperative radiation, but its exact role has yet to be determined. Chemotherapy is usually reserved for chemotherapy-sensitive histologic subtypes and for patients who have metastatic STS.

Advanced-technology radiation therapy in the management of bone and soft tissue sarcomas

BACKGROUND

For patients with sarcomas, radiotherapy can be used as neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or primary local therapy, depending on the site and type of sarcoma, the surgical approach, and the efficacy of chemotherapy.

METHODS

The authors review the current status of advanced technology radiation therapy in the management of bone and soft tissue sarcoma.

RESULTS

Advances in radiotherapy have resulted in improved treatment for bone and soft tissue sarcomas. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) uses modifications in the intensity of the photon-beam from a linear accelerator across the irradiated fields to enhance dose conformation in three dimensions. For proton-beam radiation therapy, the nuclei of hydrogen atoms are accelerated in cyclotrons or synchrotrons, extracted, and transported to treatment rooms where the proton beam undergoes a series of modifications that conform the dose in a particular patient to the tumor target. Brachytherapy and intraoperative radiation therapy have generally been used to treat microscopic residual disease in patients with sarcomas. These technologies deliver dose to tumor cells with irradiation of limited volumes of normal tissue. Patients who may benefit from technically advanced radiotherapy include those with skull base and spine/paraspinal sarcomas, Ewing's sarcoma, and retroperitoneal/extremity sarcomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Advances in radiation therapy technology, particularly IMRT, proton-beam or other charged-particle radiation therapy, brachytherapy, and intraoperative radiation therapy, have led to improved treatment for patients with bone and soft tissue sarcomas.

Nerve tolerance to high-dose-rate brachytherapy in patients with soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective study

Background

Brachytherapy, interstitial tumor bed irradiation, following conservative surgery has been shown to provide excellent local control and limb preservation in patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS), whereas little is known about the tolerance of peripheral nerves to brachytherapy. In particular, nerve tolerance to high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy has never been properly evaluated. In this study, we examined the efficacy and radiation neurotoxicity of HDR brachytherapy in patients with STS in contact with neurovascular structures.

Methods

Between 1995 and 2000, seven patients with STS involving the neurovascular bundle were treated in our institute with limb-preserving surgery, followed by fractionated HDR brachytherapy. Pathological examination demonstrated that 6 patients had high-grade lesions with five cases of negative margins and one case with positive margins, and one patient had a low-grade lesion with a negative margin. Afterloading catheters placed within the tumor bed directly upon the preserved neurovascular structures were postoperatively loaded with Iridium-192 with a total dose of 50 Gy in 6 patients. One patient received 30 Gy of HDR brachytherapy combined with 20 Gy of adjuvant external beam radiation.

Results

With a median follow-up of 4 years, the 5-year actuarial overall survival, disease-free survival, and local control rates were 83.3, 68.6, and 83.3%, respectively. None of the 7 patients developed HDR brachytherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Of 5 survivors, 3 evaluable patients had values of motor nerve conduction velocity of the preserved peripheral nerve in the normal range.

Conclusion

In this study, there were no practical and electrophysiological findings of neurotoxicity of HDR brachytherapy. Despite the small number of patients, our encouraging results are valuable for limb-preserving surgery of unmanageable STS involving critical neurovascular structures.

Radiation therapy for soft tissue sarcoma

Sarcomas are relatively uncommon tumors of mesenchymal origin. They may arise anywhere within the musculoskeletal system and are typically classified by clinical behavior into benign, borderline, or malignant. This article focuses primarily on the role of radiation for malignant soft tissue sarcoma and selected borderline tumors.

Brachytherapy for locally recurrent soft-tissue sarcoma

Radiation is used to reduce potential risk of local recurrence from microscopic residual disease after surgical resection. Brachytherapy is a clinically established means of providing radiation for soft-tissue sarcomas that recur after surgical resection alone or surgical resection and radiation. Although the total dose of radiation that is prescribed is approximately the same for patients undergoing external beam radiation or brachytherapy, the radiobiologic characteristics of brachytherapy, based on the inverse-square law, provide higher doses of radiation to the surgical bed. This provides a theoretical advantage for the use of brachytherapy as compared with external beam radiation among patients with recurrence after surgical resection. When soft-tissue sarcomas recur in a previously irradiated area, further external beam radiation generally is not possible; therefore, brachytherapy allows a radiotherapeutic alternative in an attempt to reduce the risk of further local recurrence. Recommendations for patient selection, the total dose of radiation, and the radiation dose-rate are outlined. Standard grading systems for response, symptoms, and severity of complications should be used.

Adjuvant brachytherapy for primary high-grade soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity

BACKGROUND

We reviewed single-institution experience using brachytherapy alone for primary high-grade soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity.

METHODS

Between July 1982 and September 1997, 202 adult patients with primary high-grade soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity were treated with limb-sparing surgery and adjuvant brachytherapy. All patients underwent complete gross resection, but the margin of resection was microscopically positive in 18% of patients. The median dose of brachytherapy was 45 Gy delivered over 5 days. Tumors located in the shoulder or groin were defined as central location. Complications were assessed in terms of wound complications, bone fracture, and peripheral nerve damage.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 61 months, the 5-year local control, distant relapse-free survival, and overall survival rates were 84%, 63%, and 70%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, poor local control correlated with shoulder location, positive microscopic margins of resection, and nonshoulder upper extremity site. The 5-year actuarial rates of wound complications requiring reoperation, bone fracture, and grade > or = 3 nerve damage were 12%, 3%, and 5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant brachytherapy provides adequate local control and acceptable morbidity that compares favorably with data reported for external beam radiation. Shoulder tumor location was identified as an independent prognostic factor for poor local control, mandating further improvement in the local management of these tumors.

The American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for brachytherapy of soft tissue sarcomas

PURPOSE

This report presents the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) guidelines for the use of brachytherapy for patients with soft tissue sarcoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Members of the ABS with expertise in soft tissue sarcoma formulated brachytherapy guidelines based upon their clinical experience and a review of the literature. The Board of Directors of the ABS approved the final report.

RESULTS

Brachytherapy used alone or in combination with external beam irradiation is an established means of safely providing adjuvant local treatment after resection for soft tissue sarcomas in adults and in children. Brachytherapy options include low dose rate techniques with iridium 192 or iodine 125, fractionated high dose rate brachytherapy, or intraoperative high dose rate therapy. Recommendations are made for patient selection, techniques, dose rates, and dosages. Complications and possible interventions to minimize their occurrence and severity are reviewed.

CONCLUSION

Brachytherapy represents an effective means of enhancing the therapeutic ratio, offering both biologic and dosimetric advantage in the treatment of patients with soft tissue sarcoma. The treatment approach used depends upon the institution, physician expertise, and the clinical situation. Guidelines are established for the use of brachytherapy in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas in adults and in children. Practitioners and cooperative groups are encouraged to use these guidelines to formulate their treatment and dose-reporting policies. These guidelines will be modified, as further clinical results become available.

Morbidity of adjuvant brachytherapy in soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity and superficial trunk

PURPOSE

We have previously shown that adjuvant brachytherapy (BRT) improves local control in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremity and superficial trunk. A detailed assessment of the morbidity of this approach has not been examined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the toxicity associated with adjuvant BRT in terms of wound complications, bone fracture, and peripheral nerve damage.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between July 1982 and June 1992, 164 adult patients with STS of the extremity or superficial trunk were randomized intraoperatively to receive or not to receive BRT after complete resection. BRT was delivered with (192)Ir to a total dose of 42-45 Gy. The BRT and no-BRT arms were balanced with regard to age, sex, presentation (primary vs. recurrent), site, grade, size, and depth. Morbidity was assessed in terms of significant wound complication, bone fracture, and peripheral nerve damage (grade > or = 3). The significant wound complications were defined as those wound problems requiring operative revision for coverage or threatened limb loss, persistent seroma requiring repeated aspirations and/or drainage, wound separation > 2 cm, hematoma > 25 ml, and/or purulent wound discharge. The median follow-up was 100 months.

RESULTS

The significant wound complication rate was 24% in the BRT group and 14% in the no-BRT group, (p = 0.13). The rate of wound reoperation, however, was significantly higher in the BRT arm (10% vs. 0%; p = 0. 006). Examination of other covariables that may have contributed to wound reoperation revealed the width of the excised skin (WES) to be a significant factor [1% (WES < or = 4 cm) vs. 10% (WES > 4 cm), p = 0. 02]. Bone fracture only occurred in patients receiving BRT (n = 3, 4%), although this was not statistically significant (p = 0.2). The rate of peripheral nerve damage, however, was similar in both arms (7% vs. 7%).

CONCLUSION

The overall morbidity associated with adjuvant BRT was not significantly higher than that with surgery alone. However, BRT and WES > 4 cm were associated with significantly higher wound reoperation rate. This has significant implications for strategies designed to maximize wound coverage in patients who receive BRT.

The cost effectiveness of 3D conformal radiation therapy compared with conventional techniques for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

We previously demonstrated the advantages of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) in improved rates of biochemical (bNED) control in certain subsets of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. However, in this era of cost consciousness and limited resources, the cost effectiveness of 3DCRT compared with conventional external beam irradiation (CRT) remains unexamined.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between October 1, 1987 and November 30, 1991, 193 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer received definitive external beam irradiation at Fox Chase Cancer Center. The 1998 Medicare fee schedule was used to determine treatment charges and to provide a reference for a national comparison. Complete charges for pretreatment work-up, treatment, and follow-up were tabulated for each patient. The mean total charges (MTC) using the Lin method of estimating medical costs was used to analyze and compare costs between groups. A matched case/control analysis was performed to further evaluate the effect of cost between techniques. The median follow-up was 72 months (range 3-118).

RESULTS

The overall 5-year actuarial rate of bNED control was 41% and 53%, respectively, for the CRT and 3DCRT patients (p = 0.03). The MTC for the CRT patients was $10,544.53. For the 3DCRT patients, the MTC was $8,955.48. The sample mean of the total costs from the observed deaths for the two patient groups by follow-up interval ranged from $9,800.63 to $59,635.01 for the CRT patients to $17,259.00 to $24,250.38 for the 3DCRT patients. No statistically significant difference in cost was observed between groups using the matched case/control analysis.

CONCLUSION

Initial work-up and treatment costs were greater for patients treated with 3DCRT compared with patients treated with conventional techniques. However, with longer follow-up, the mean total cost of treatment was not statistically different between the two treatment groups. Because of improved rates of bNED control for these patients and the increased costs associated with the treatment of a greater fraction of patients with recurrent disease following CRT, 3DCRT was cost effective for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.

The local management of soft tissue sarcoma

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumors arising from the connective tissues. STS can arise at any anatomic site, can demonstrate varied behavior and prognosis, and therefore present a formidable challenge in management. The local treatment of STS demands technical complexity in the application of diagnostic tools, including pathology and imaging, as well as treatment approaches, including surgical ablation and reconstruction, radiotherapy, and, in defined cases, chemotherapy. The understanding of the management of these lesions is profoundly dependent on the multidisciplinary setting, where experience has been gained and skills are available to increase the likelihood of a successful result. Several proven options are available for optimal local management, and the choice of approach depends on the prevailing practice and resource profile of the treating center. With modern approaches, the local control rate can be expected to be at least 90% for extremity lesions, which constitute the most common STS. The experience in other anatomic sites is less favorable as a result of a combination of late diagnosis, technically difficult access sites, and possibly less familiarity with these less common presentations. The disappointing results make it all the more important for patients to be referred to a multidisciplinary setting with experience in sarcoma management to maximize the chance of successful local outcome.

Contemporary radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma

This review will detail the role of radiotherapy in the management of soft tissue sarcoma. Particular emphasis will be given to its role as an adjuvant to surgical excision for local curative management. The addition of radiotherapy permits a tissue-conserving operation to be performed, which has functional and cosmetic advantages yet produces local control equivalent to more radical surgery alone. The review will consider the historical evolution of treatment up through recent and contemporary practice. The principles of use will be outlined using available evidence and, where this is lacking, it will be acknowledged with suggestions for improvement. Finally, a brief overview of some technical issues about radiotherapy will be provided.

Combined modality treatment of extremity soft tissue sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Substantial progress has been made in the multimodality treatment of soft tissue sarcoma over the past decade. This review summarizes current state-of-the-art management for patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma.

METHODS

Literature-based review of combined modality treatment of extremity sarcoma.

RESULTS

The revised staging system of the International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC/AJCC) for this disease is described and a practical approach to diagnosis, evaluation, management, and follow-up of patients is presented. Brief summaries of the roles of surgical therapy, pre- and postoperative radiotherapy, pre- and postoperative chemotherapy, and concurrent chemoradiation in the management of extremity soft tissue sarcoma are provided, with summaries of the available data from randomized prospective trials. The data referenced and discussed herein provide the basis for stage-specific treatment recommendations for the management of patients with localized soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities.

CONCLUSIONS

Soft tissue sarcoma remains a challenging disease to treat. The majority of patients require an integrated combined modality approach. Future research should be directed at developing more effective systemic therapies and minimizing the toxicities of local therapies.

[Could the evaluation of the cost of complications be a worthwhile means to improve radiotherapy?]

At the present time, the current improvement of technical and dosimetric aspects of radiation oncology has to be evaluated in terms of potential benefit for the patient and the society. For this last point of view, specially designed economic analyses must be performed in order to justify the number of resources involved by these technical improvements. If the question is how the current technical procedures could reduce the risk of undesirable side-effects, the response cannot be immediately drawn from the literature. This paper emphasizes the possibility to evaluate the role of side-effects as endpoints of economic analyses when using special models in medical decision making such as Markov's. Only few oncologic situations are reliable to properly analyze the relationship between sophisticated radiation techniques and the incidence of post-radiation complications. These situations should be selected when prospective economic analyses are planned in the field of radiation therapy.

Economic analyses in health care: an introduction to the methodology with an emphasis on radiation therapy

Payers are increasingly interested in knowing whether they are receiving value for the dollars they spend on health care. Because economic analysis will be used as a means of evaluating radiation therapy, it is important that radiation oncologists understand the basic methodology employed in such analyses. This review article describes the four basic types of economic analyses: cost minimization, cost effectiveness, cost utility, and cost benefit. Specification of alternative therapies, choice of perspective of the analysis, measurements of costs and benefits, and the role of discounting and sensitivity analyses are discussed. Published economic analyses that pertain directly to treatment with radiation therapy are reviewed. Finally, we close with a brief discussion of the potential areas for future economic outcomes research in radiation oncology.