Stereotactic fine-needle aspiration biopsy for the evaluation of nonpalpable breast lesions: report of an experience based on 2,988 cases

Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology in histological grade 1 breast carcinomas: are we good enough?

BACKGROUND

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of both palpable and non-palpable breast carcinomas has a high accuracy and sensitivity in dedicated centres. It is generally thought that low-grade carcinomas have a distinctly lower sensitivity due to discrete cellular atypia that may be difficult to appreciate. Grade 1 carcinomas make up about 45% of screening-detected breast carcinomas and about 20% of symptomatic breast cancers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity of grade 1 carcinomas and identify the critical features in the cytological diagnostic work-up of these tumours.

METHODS

There were FNAC smears from 494 histologically confirmed grade 1 carcinomas diagnosed during 1996-2004. The cytological diagnoses were compared with the histology.

RESULTS

A definitive malignant diagnosis (absolute sensitivity) was given in 382 cases (77.3%). Equivocal or suspicious diagnoses were given in 75 (15.2%), benign or probably benign (false negative) in 24 (4.8%). Thirteen cases (2.6%) were unsatisfactory. Complete sensitivity was 92.7%. Invasive ductal carcinomas comprised 81.3% of all cases; absolute sensitivity for these was 80.9%. Invasive lobular and tubular carcinomas comprised 7.3% and 5.9% of cases, respectively; absolute sensitivity for these diagnosis was 50.0% and 57.1%, respectively, significantly lower than for other subtypes (P <or= 0.0001) whereas the difference for complete sensitivity was less but still significant (P = 0.017). Absolute and complete sensitivities were lower for tumours less than 1 cm size compared with more than 1 cm (P <or= 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative FNAC diagnosis of grade 1 breast carcinoma has a high sensitivity, especially in ductal carcinomas. Invasive lobular and tubular carcinomas were less likely to receive a definite preoperative diagnosis. The main reason for not reaching a definitive malignant diagnosis was sampling error due to small tumours less than 1 cm in diameter, irrespective of tumour subtype.

Fine-needle aspiration cytology in nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities in breast cancer screening: results from the breast cancer screening programme in Oslo 1996-2001

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of nonpalpable mammographic lesions has been under attack from two sides for some years. There has been much discussion and controversy as to the ability to differentiate between in situ and invasive carcinomas in cytological material. A further issue is that of optimal sampling to obtain adequate cell material in sufficient quantity. We present the results of FNAC from 832 nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities detected in the course of the breast cancer screening programme in Oslo during 1996-2001. In 11.6% of cases the smears were inadequate, and there were 7% false negatives (FN) and 1.3% false positives. Of the FN, 64% represented microcalcifications and 86% were due to sampling errors. Absolute sensitivity was 74%, complete sensitivity 88% and specificity 88%. In 255 carcinomas a cytological diagnosis of them as in situ or invasive was made. In 93% of the invasive cases (190/205) these had been correctly identified as invasive on FNAC. In 78% of cases proper follow-up could be resolved by cytology/radiology alone. Suboptimal sampling and localization remains the main cause of FN FNAC results. Problems in differentiating between in situ and invasive breast carcinomas can be significantly reduced by applying strict criteria for in situ lesions.

Application of image-guided biopsy for impalpable breast lesions in Chinese women

BACKGROUND

Screening for breast cancer has resulted in an increasing number of mammographically detected lesions that require further management. The Advanced Breast Biopsy Instrumentation system is a recently added biopsy technique for the management of such lesions. The present paper will review the authors' experience in the use of this procedure in Chinese patients whose breast volume was smaller than that of Caucasians.

METHODS

Ninety-three patients were listed for the procedure and 78 (84%) underwent the procedure successfully. Ninety-two lesions were biopsied. Advanced Breast Biopsy Instrumentation (ABBI) was performed for clustered microcalcifications or abnormal mass/density. Minimally Invasive Breast Biopsy (MIBB), a suction-assisted core biopsy device, was employed for more scattered lesions. For small volume breasts, it may be required to bring the hand through the aperture to get the targeted lesions onto the digital image or, in the case of ABBI, to excise just beyond the deep margin of the lesion rather than the recommended depth.

RESULTS

The ABBI was performed for 43 (46.7%) lesions and MIBB for 49 (53.3%) lesions. Nine (9.8%) were diagnosed to have ductal carcinoma in situ, two (2.2%) had ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion and eight (8.7%) had invasive ductal carcinoma. All the malignant lesions required further management. In addition, 19 (20.7%) were found to have atypical hyperplasia. Patients' satisfaction and cosmetic outcome are good.

CONCLUSION

The ABBI and MIBB procedures can be applied satisfactorily for biopsy of mammographic lesions with good -cosmetic outcome in Chinese patients.

Fine needle aspiration cytology in the work-up of mammographic and ultrasonographic findings in breast cancer screening: an attempt at differentiating in situ and invasive carcinoma

This study evaluated the results of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) from the first four years of organized mammography screening for breast cancer in Oslo, particularly our policy in differentiating in situ and invasive carcinoma. Lesions were aspirated directly, ultrasound guided, by stereotaxic device or biopsy localization plate. All lesions were aspirated by cytopathologists working with the radiologists at the breast diagnostic centre. Smears were evaluated immediately for assessment of adequacy and a preliminary diagnosis was given to the surgeon. When FNAC revealed malignancy, diagnostic terms were as follows: (1) invasive carcinoma; (2) ductal carcinoma in situ of comedo type (high nuclear grade), cannot evaluate infiltration; (3) ductal carcinoma in situ of low nuclear grade and (4) papillary tumour, cannot evaluate infiltration. There were 953 cases, 70% of which were nonpalpable. Insufficient material was obtained in 5.8%. Absolute and complete sensitivity were 81% and 91%, respectively. Specificity was 85%. There were 448 histologically proven carcinomas. 383 of these were invasive. 362 carcinomas (in situ and invasive) (80.8%) were diagnosed directly on FNAC. Distinction between invasive and in situ carcinoma was possible in 294 of 320 directly diagnosed invasive carcinomas (91.8%). PPV of a diagnosis of invasive carcinoma was 97%. Our data showed that definitive cytological diagnosis of invasive carcinoma was possible in more than 90% of fully diagnostic smears and allowed definitive primary surgery in these women.

False-positive reports in fine needle biopsy of breast lesions

A review of the literature reveals considerable variations in the diagnostic accuracy of fine needle biopsy (FNB) of breast lesions between series, partly due to different methods of calculation, different definitions, and insufficient numbers of cases with adequate follow-up to provide reliable statistics. The best larger series have a false-positive rate between 0.2 and 0.3%, slightly higher for non-palpable than for palpable lesions. The cytological patterns of a range of benign lesions which may cause diagnostic difficulties and may be misdiagnosed as malignant by FNB are described, and guidelines to reduce the risk of false-positive diagnoses are proposed.

Breast cancer surgery--historical evolution, current status and future perspectives

The diagnosis and management of breast cancer have changed dramatically over the past two decades in response not only to new technologies but also to cultural and social aspects of the discase. Mastectomy (either radical or modified radical) was the historical mainstay of the treatment of breast cancer for decades. Although mastectomy continues to be appropriate for some patients, breast conservation has become the preferred method of treatment for many patients. Meeting the dual goal of optimum cosmesis and minimal rates of in-breast recurrences after breast-conservation therapy requires the selection and integration of appropriate diagnostic methods (including breast imaging techniques and breast biopsy techniques) its well as therapeutic methods (breast irradiation techniques, and systemic cytotoxic and hormonal therapy). To achieve optimal breast-conservation treatment, a multidisciplinary approach is neccessary. Mastectomy followed by breast reconstruction is a valuable alternative for patients who require or choose mastectomy. After tumor downstaging with induction chemotherapy, a large percentage of patients with large or locally advanced tumors will be able to undergo breast-conservation therapy Partial (levels I and II) axillary lymph node dissection remains the standard of care in the surgical management of patients with invasive breast cancer. Recently there has been intense interest in selective axillary lymph node dissection, focused mainly on the identification of patients who are likely to benefit from axillary lymph node dissection, using sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Critical clinicopathologic analysis of 23 cases of fine-needle breast sampling initially recorded as false-positive. The 44-year experience of the Institut Curie

BACKGROUND

Because false-positive cytologic diagnoses in breast tumors are rare, few cases have been reported, although their consequences may be highly detrimental to the patient. The authors report the Institut Curie's experience, by using a multidisciplinary approach.

METHODS

Of 9334 benign breast tumors examined preoperatively for cytologic diagnosis by fine-needle sampling (FNS), the 23 (0.25%) FNS cases considered to be false-positive were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

Tumors were situated close to the nipple in 7 cases and away from the nipple in 16 cases. Tumor stage was T0 for 1 case, T1 for 18 cases, and T2 for 4 cases. Radiologically, six tumors were classified as malignant, seven as indeterminate or suspicious, and nine as benign. Three of six tumors studied by flow cytometry were DNA aneuploid. Based on a multidisciplinary clinicopathologic review, 20 FNS cases were finally classified as false-positive, and the remaining 3 tumors with malignant FNS and subsequent benign histology were classified as true-positive, because local and/or metastatic progression was observed in the short term.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' review suggests two categories of false-positive cases: the first in which cytologic benign patterns are overdiagnosed, and the second in which atypical morphologic criteria were present. Nevertheless, as shown by the malignant course in three cases, patients with malignant preoperative FNS and corresponding benign histology always require close clinical follow-up. Finally, surgical overtreatment rate could be decreased if all radiologically benign tumors with positive/suspicious FNS were subject to intraoperative frozen section examination.

Minimal access breast surgery

Minimal access procedures have great potential for providing patients with equal, if not superior, forms of breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. Many of these procedures are in a process of evolution. The reliability of each method probably depends heavily on the training, ability, and experience of the operator. Surgeons should be aware of the advantages and pitfalls of these techniques and exercise caution during the initial phases of their learning experience.

Evaluation of stereotactic core needle biopsy (SCNB) of the breast at a single institution

Stereotactic core needle biopsy (SCNB) has become a popular method for diagnosis of occult breast abnormalities. There are few large series of SCNB from a single institution. Data on patients undergoing SCNB for mammographic abnormalities were collected prospectively over 43 months at a university hospital. Mammographic findings were categorized as benign, probably benign, indeterminate, suspicious or malignant. For lesions with SCNB pathology that were non-diagnostic, showed atypical hyperplasia or malignancy (in situ or invasive), or were discordant with the pre-biopsy mammogram findings, surgical excision was recommended. Subsequent surgical pathology was reviewed. All remaining lesions were followed mammographically after SCNB. SCNB was performed on 692 lesions in 607 patients. There were 79 malignancies, for a positive SCNB rate of 11.4%. The 349 SCNB performed for benign, probably benign and indeterminate lesions on mammography had a positive SCNB rate of only 4%. Surgery was recommended for 127 (18.3%) lesions, while 565 (81.6%) were followed mammographically after SCNB. A compliance rate of 61 % for at least one follow-up mammogram was obtained, with a median follow-up of 17.2 months and with no cancers found. The sensitivity for malignancy with SCNB was 93%. SCNB provides a minimally invasive method to assess mammographic abnormalities. Abnormalities considered radiographically to be other than malignant or suspicious yielded few cancers. In this series a low positive SCNB rate resulted in no false negatives on mammographic follow-up. The optimal positive biopsy rate for SCNB is debatable.

The changing role of surgery in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer

Many changes have occurred in the surgical treatment of the cancer patient. For many tumors, surgery has been modified or eliminated. These changes are due to the realization that, for some cancers, more extensive surgical procedures are not more beneficial, to improvements in radiation therapy and chemotherapy, to the availability of better noninvasive or less invasive diagnostic and therapeutic techniques, and to improved surgical equipment (such as videoscopic surgery).

Stereotaxic aspiration biopsy in the evaluation of mammographically detected clustered microcalcification

BACKGROUND

Stereotaxic fine-needle aspiration biopsy (SFNA) of mammographically detected nonpalpable lesions of the breast provides accurate diagnosis and may eliminate many unnecessary excisional biopsies of areas of microcalcification.

METHODS

SFNA of microcalcification of indeterminate radiologic significance was performed on 125 patients (1991-1994), yielding 130 specimens (2 sites in 2 patients and bilateral aspirations in 3 patients). Stereotaxic localization was performed, and samples from within the area of microcalcification were obtained using 22-gauge needles. Smears stained with a Giemsa-type stain were prepared and studied by a cytopathologist during the procedure to determine the adequacy of each specimen.

RESULTS

Of 130 specimens, 104 (80%) were cytologically benign, 13 (10%) were atypical, 6 (4.6%) were suspicious, and 7 (5.3%) were malignant. All malignant diagnoses were confirmed by subsequent operative biopsy. Follow-up was available in 74 of 104 benign cases (71%): surgical excisions (all benign) in 8 cases and follow-up mammograms at 6 months to 5.8 years in 66 cases (no radiologic change in 64 cases and 2 [1.9%] cases with new radiologic findings [SFNAs of the new radiographic abnormality revealed adenocarcinoma in both]).

CONCLUSIONS

SFNA is a reliable and cost-effective method of evaluating indeterminate microcalcification; however, mammographic follow-up is indicated because of the possibility of subsequent and independent cancers.

Microscopic localization of calcifications in and around breast carcinoma: a cautionary note for needle core biopsies

OBJECTIVE

To detail the microanatomic localization of microcalcifications (Ca++) occurring in association with breast carcinoma and thereby to determine their reliability as a marker of breast carcinoma in small tissue core biopsies.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Identification of the pathology associated with Ca++ in mammograms has acquired increasing importance in the early detection of breast carcinoma. With recent advances enabling computer-guided stereoscopic needle biopsy of calcified foci, histopathologic diagnosis is rendered on increasingly small tissue samples, raising the risk of misdiagnosis. Knowledge of the microanatomic distribution of Ca++ in relation to diagnostic epithelial elements is essential for assessing their significance in small tissue biopsies.

METHODS

All 32 carcinomas with Ca++ within 1 cm of carcinoma diagnosed by open biopsy at the New England Deaconess Hospital from January 1994 to January 1995 were studied. Ca++ were classified as being within ductal or lobular carcinoma in situ, invasive carcinoma, carcinoma-associated stroma, benign stroma >1 mm from carcinoma, or benign ducts or terminal duct-lobular units. If Ca++ were peritumoral, their distance from the tumor was measured.

RESULTS

Ca++ were present only in malignant components in 31%, only in benign components in 34%, and in both in 34% of cases. The most common locations of Ca++ were benign peritumoral ducts (62%) and ductal carcinoma in situ (54%). The microanatomic distribution of benign peritumoral Ca++ in relation to the mass is detailed.

CONCLUSIONS

In carcinomas with Ca++ in the area of tumor, Ca++ may not be localized to malignant tissue. Caution should be used when interpreting the finding of Ca++ in benign components of small tissue samples of breast masses.

Image-guided core-needle breast biopsy is an accurate technique to evaluate patients with nonpalpable imaging abnormalities

OBJECTIVE

The goal was to evaluate one institution's experience with image-guided core-needle breast biopsy (IGCNBB) and compare the pathologic results with wire-localized excisional breast biopsy (WLEBB) for patients with positive cores and the mammographic surveillance results for patients with negative cores.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

IGCNBB is becoming a popular, minimally invasive alternative to WLEBB in the evaluation of patients with nonpalpable abnormalities.

METHODS

This study includes all patients with nonpalpable breast imaging abnormalities evaluated by IGCNBB from July 1993 to February 1997. Patients with positive cores (atypical hyperplasia, carcinoma in situ, or invasive carcinoma) were evaluated by WLEBB. Patients with negative cores (benign histology) were followed with a standard mammographic protocol. IGCNBB results were compared with WLEBB results to determine the sensitivity and specificity for each IGCNBB pathologic diagnosis.

RESULTS

Of 1440 IGCNBBs performed during the study period, 1106 were classified as benign, and during surveillance follow-up only a single patient was demonstrated to have a carcinoma in the index part of the breast evaluated by IGCNBB (97.3% sensitivity, 99.7% specificity). IGCNBB demonstrated atypical hyperplasia in 72 patients, 5 of whom refused WLEBB. The remaining 67 patients were evaluated by WLEBB: nonmalignant findings were found in 31, carcinoma in situ was found in 25, and invasive carcinoma was found in 11 (100% sensitivity, 88.8% specificity). IGCNBB demonstrated carcinoma in situ in 84 patients; WLEBB confirmed carcinoma in situ in 54 and invasive carcinoma in 30 (65.4% sensitivity, 97.7% specificity). IGCNBB demonstrated invasive carcinoma in 178 patients. Three were lost to follow-up. On WLEBB, 173 of the remaining 175 had invasive carcinoma; the other 2 patients had carcinoma in situ (80.8% sensitivity, 99.8% specificity).

CONCLUSIONS

An IGCNBB that demonstrates atypical hyperplasia or carcinoma in situ requires WLEBB to define the extent of breast pathology. Mammographic surveillance for a patient with a benign IGCNBB is supported by nearly 100% specificity. An IGCNBB diagnosis of invasive carcinoma is also associated with nearly 100% specificity; therefore, these patients can have definitive surgical therapy, including axillary dissection or mastectomy, without waiting for the pathologic results of a WLEBB. Based on the authors' findings, IGCNBB can safely replace WLEBB in evaluating patients with nonpalpable breast abnormalities.