Prevalence of psychopathology in carpal tunnel syndrome patients

Association between carpal tunnel syndrome and the five-year incidence of anxiety disorder and depression in adults followed in general practices in Germany

OBJECTIVE

Little is known about the longitudinal relationship between carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and mental health. Therefore, this retrospective cohort study investigated the association between CTS and the five-year incidence of anxiety disorder and depression in adults from Germany.

METHODS

Data from the Disease Analyzer database (IQVIA) were used for the present study. Patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed for the first time with CTS in one of 1284 general practices in Germany in 2005-2020 were included (index date). Individuals without CTS were matched to those with CTS using a propensity score based on age, sex, the mean number of consultations per year during the follow-up, and the index year. In people without CTS, the index date was a randomly selected consultation in 2005-2020.

RESULTS

There were 75,135 patients with and 75,135 patients without CTS included in the study (mean [SD] age 57.2 [16.5] years; 59.7% women). Within five years of the index date, the incidence of anxiety disorder was 3.9% and 3.6% in the group with and the group without CTS, respectively (log-rank p-value<0.001), while figures for depression were 14.8% and 11.5% (log-rank p-value<0.001). These findings were corroborated in the Cox regression analyses adjusted for multiple physical conditions, as CTS was associated with anxiety disorder (HR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.08-1.21) and depression (HR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.25-1.33) in the overall sample.

CONCLUSION

CTS was associated with an increased incidence of anxiety disorder and depression in Germany. Further research should identify the mediators involved in these relationships.

Does electrodiagnostic evidence correlate with mood and function in patients with a pre-diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome?

Objectives

This study aims to investigate if function and mood involvement correlate in female patients who have a pre-diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and its correlation with physical examination and electrodiagnostic findings.

Patients and methods

A total of 170 patients between the ages of 18-65 who applied to Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation outpatient clinics with CTS symptoms between May 2014 and December 2015 were enrolled. The mean age of patients was 44.6±11 years. Before electrophysiological testing (electromyography; EMG), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH), Beck Depression Inventory, Tinnel, Phalen and Durkan tests, grip and pinch strength measurement by JAMAR hand dynamometer were performed. The patients also used a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to determine the severity of their symptoms during the day and at night.

Results

In 98 patients (57.6%) the diagnosis of CTS was confirmed by EMG, while 72 patients (42.4%) had normal electrodiagnostic findings. In patients who had normal EMG, Beck Depression Inventory and QuickDASH scores were not significantly different from the patients who had an electrodiagnosis of CTS. Pain experienced in the night was significantly higher in patients who had an electrodiagnosis of CTS, and these patients had significantly higher Beck Depression Inventory and QuickDASH scores.

Conclusion

The lack of electrodiagnostic evidence in patients who have CTS symptoms does not show that function and mood are not affected in these patients. However, mood is significantly affected in patients with severe CTS.

Ergonomic Pain--Part 2: Differential Diagnosis and Management Considerations

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) can produce ergonomic pain in several different regions of the body, including the shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand, lumbar spine, knee, and ankle/foot. Each family of disorders is distinctive in presentation and requires diagnosis-specific interventions. Because of the complex nature of these disorders, management approaches may not always eliminate symptoms and or completely restore patient function to a level found prior to symptom onset. As a consequence, ergonomic measures should be implemented to reduce the overload on tissue and contribute to patient recovery. However, functional limits may persist and the clinician must make further decisions regarding a person's functional status in the chronic stages of the patient's care.

Integrated case management for work-related upper-extremity disorders: impact of patient satisfaction on health and work status

An integrated case management (ICM) approach (ergonomic and problem-solving intervention) to work-related upper-extremity disorders was examined in relation to patient satisfaction, future symptom severity, function, and return to work (RTW). Federal workers with work-related upper-extremity disorder workers' compensation claims (n = 205) were randomly assigned to usual care or ICM intervention. Patient satisfaction was assessed after the 4-month intervention period. Questionnaires on clinical outcomes and ergonomic exposure were administered at baseline and at 6- and 12-months postintervention. Time from intervention to RTW was obtained from an administrative database. ICM group assignment was significantly associated with greater patient satisfaction. Regression analyses found higher patient satisfaction levels predicted decreased symptom severity and functional limitations at 6 months and a shorter RTW. At 12 months, predictors of positive outcomes included male gender, lower distress, lower levels of reported ergonomic exposure, and receipt of ICM. Findings highlight the utility of targeting workplace ergonomic and problem solving skills.

Development of a screen for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with work-related upper extremity disorders

This study prospectively examined the extent to which a set of medical, physical, ergonomic, occupational psychosocial, and individual psychosocial variables would predict clinical outcome associated with a diverse set of work-related upper extremity disorders in recently diagnosed individuals. This investigation was designed to develop a tool for use in a clinical setting to assist in identifying patients at risk for poorer outcome. Outcome was measured at 1, 3, and 12 months after completing a baseline questionnaire. Outcome status was based on a median split of a standardized composite index (symptoms, function, workdays lost, and mental health). Logistic regression indicated that predictors of poorer outcome at 1 month were: upper extremity comorbidity (risk ratio [RR], 1.58), pain severity (RR, 1.45), ergonomic risk exposure (RR, 1.07), low job support (RR, 1.03), and pain coping style (RR, 1.54). At 3 months, poorer outcome was predicted by: symptom severity (RR, 10.46), job stress (RR, 1.20), and pain coping style (RR, 1.98). The number of prior treatments/providers (RR, 1.77), past recommendation for surgery (RR, 6.43), and pain coping style were found to predict poorer outcome at 12 months. Sensitivity and specificity, respectively, for the models were 77.4% and 71.8% at 1 month, 80.6% and 82.4% at 3 months, and 80.6% and 83.3% at 12 months. The results indicate that baseline measures of ergonomic and psychosocial stress, pain severity, and pain coping style predict clinical outcome at shorter intervals, whereas number of past treatments/providers, recommendation for surgery and pain coping style predict longer-term outcome. The resulting prognostic screen provides a simple tool that assesses the multidimensional nature of work-related upper extremity disorders and predicts clinical outcome. Furthermore, the findings suggest the importance of early intervention that addresses both physical and psychosocial stressors at work. Specific recommendations to reduce the impact of observed risk factors are discussed.

Outcomes comparison of treatment for chronic disabling work-related upper-extremity disorders and spinal disorders

Since 1986, the percentage of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders (UEMSDs) has increased from 1% to 4% of all occupational injury claims, while the average total medical and compensation cost is 80% higher than the average of all other claims. Because chronic disability leads to the highest cost, systematic evaluation of this growing occupational condition is needed. We performed a prospective case-series cohort study of patients (n = 163) with UEMSDs, compared with a matched group of spinal disorder (SD) patients (n = 163) treated with the same protocol. UEMSD patients were subclassified as those with one or more neuropathic diagnoses or those with non-neuropathic diagnoses. The neuropathic UEMSD subgroup had the poorest outcomes, with significantly higher surgery rates, higher health care utilization rates, and lower work retention when compared with the SD group. Rehabilitation outcomes for UEMSDs are similar to those for SDs. However, neuropathic-diagnosis patients are at risk for high-cost injuries and/or poorer prognoses.

Occupational upper extremity disorders in the federal workforce. Prevalence, health care expenditures, and patterns of work disability

Upper extremity disorders (UEDs) account for a significant number of work-related illnesses in the US workforce. Little information exists on the distribution of UEDs, their associated health care and indemnity costs, or patterns of work disability. The study presented is an analysis of upper extremity claims within the federal workforce. In this study, the universe consisted of all claims accepted by the US Department of Labor, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs (OWCP), from October 1, 1993, through September 30, 1994. A total of 185,927 claims of notices of injury were processed during the study period, and of these, 8,147 or 4.4% had an UED diagnosis coded according to the International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM). 5,844 claims involved a single UED diagnosis and were the only claims field by these employees between October 1, 1990, and September 30, 1994. These single claims with single diagnoses comprised the sample for further analysis. Mononeuritis and enthesopathies of the upper limb were the most common diagnoses, accounting for 43% and 31% of the claims, respectively. Women had a higher proportion of carpal tunnel syndrome, "unspecified" mononeuritis, and "unspecified" enthesopathies. The majority of claimants for both the mononeuritis- and enthesopathy-related diagnoses were between 31 and 50 years of age, received only health care benefits, and did not incur wage loss. Health care costs for mononeuritis and enthesopathy claims were $12,228,755 (M = $2,849). Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and enthesopathy of the elbow were the most costly diagnoses, accounting for 57% and 16% of the total, respectively. Surgical services represented the highest expenditures in CTS claims. Physical therapy accounted for the majority of health care costs for enthesopathy cases. The mean number of workdays lost for CTS and enthesopathy claims were 84 and 79, and the average indemnity costs were $4,941 and $4,477, respectively. These findings indicate that while UEDs represent a relatively small percentage of all workers' compensation cases, the health care and indemnity costs are considerable. Also mean duration and pattern of work disability revealed that these disorders can result in chronic work disability similar to that observed in low back pain. The results highlight the need to determine whether interventions that account for the majority of costs significantly impact long-term outcomes. There is also a need to identify risk factors for prolonged disability in those who experience problems with delayed recovery.