The influence of intestinal flora on wound healing in mice

Fusobacterium nucleatum induces colon anastomosis leak by activating epithelial cells to express MMP9

Background

Despite advances in anastomotic techniques and perioperative care, the incidence of anastomotic leak (AL) has not substantially decreased over time. Although it is known that AL etiology is multifactorial and the mechanisms involved remain unclear, there is accumulating evidence pointing at AL related to gut microbiota.

Method

We firstly performed a clinical study to analyze the gut microbiota between colorectal cancer patients who developed AL and those who did not (nAL) using 16S-rRNA sequencing and quantitative real-time PCR to identify AL risk bacterial taxa. Then we built a rat anastomosis model and performed a bacteria transplantation to ensure the cause-effect relationship. The anastomotic healing score was used to evaluate the healing of anastomosis. In addition, we assessed the adhesion ability of bacteria by staining with fluorescein isothiocyanate and attachment assay. The expression of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) was detected by western blot, and the activity was detected by gelatin zymography.

Results

We found that the abundance and positive rate of Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn) were higher in the AL patients. Exposure of the rat's colon anastomosis to Fn contributes to the loss of submucosa collagen I and III, leading to AL's pathogenesis. Fn can attach to the gut epithelial cells and stimulate intestinal MMP9 expression in vitro and in vivo. We further confirmed that these effects of Fn depended on the E-cadherin/β-catenin signaling pathway.

Conclusion

This work demonstrates that Fn attaches and then stimulates the expression of epithelial cells MMP9 by the E-cadherin/β-catenin signaling pathway. These effects contribute to collagen break down in the intestinal tissue, finally leading to AL.

Probiotics in Intestinal Mucosal Healing: A New Therapy or an Old Friend?

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), Crohn’s disease, and ulcerative colitis are characterized by chronic and relapsing inflammation, while their pathogenesis remains mostly unelucidated. Gut commensal microbiota seem to be one of the various implicated factors, as several studies have shown a significant decrease in the microbiome diversity of patients with IBD. Although the question of whether microbiota dysbiosis is a causal factor or the result of chronic inflammation remains unanswered, one fact is clear; active inflammation in IBD results in the disruption of the mucus layer structure, barrier function, and also, colonization sites. Recently, many studies on IBD have been focusing on the interplay between mucosal and luminal microbiota, underlining their possible beneficial effect on mucosal healing. Regarding this notion, it has now been shown that specific probiotic strains, when administrated, lead to significantly decreased inflammation, amelioration of colitis, and improved mucosal healing. Probiotics are live microorganisms exerting beneficial effects on the host’s health when administered in adequate quantity. The aim of this review was to present and discuss the current findings on the role of gut microbiota and their metabolites in intestinal wound healing and the effects of probiotics on intestinal mucosal wound closure.

The gut microbiota and colorectal surgery outcomes: facts or hype? A narrative review

BACKGROUND

The gut microbiota (GM) has been proposed as one of the main determinants of colorectal surgery complications and theorized as the "missing factor" that could explain still poorly understood complications. Herein, we investigate this theory and report the current evidence on the role of the GM in colorectal surgery.

METHODS

We first present the findings associating the role of the GM with the physiological response to surgery. Second, the change in GM composition during and after surgery and its association with colorectal surgery complications (ileus, adhesions, surgical-site infections, anastomotic leak, and diversion colitis) are reviewed. Finally, we present the findings linking GM science to the application of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol, for the use of oral antibiotics with mechanical bowel preparation and for the administration of probiotics/synbiotics.

RESULTS

According to preclinical and translational evidence, the GM is capable of influencing colorectal surgery outcomes. Clinical evidence supports the application of an ERAS protocol and the preoperative administration of multistrain probiotics/synbiotics. GM manipulation with oral antibiotics with mechanical bowel preparation still has uncertain benefits in right-sided colic resection but is very promising for left-sided colic resection.

CONCLUSIONS

The GM may be a determinant of colorectal surgery outcomes. There is an emerging need to implement translational research on the topic. Future clinical studies should clarify the composition of preoperative and postoperative GM and the impact of the GM on different colorectal surgery complications and should assess the validity of GM-targeted measures in effectively reducing complications for all colorectal surgery locations.

A microbiome and metabolomic signature of phases of cutaneous healing identified by profiling sequential acute wounds of human skin: An exploratory study

Profiling skin microbiome and metabolome has been utilised to gain further insight into wound healing processes. The aims of this multi-part temporal study in 11 volunteers were to analytically profile the dynamic wound tissue and headspace metabolome and sequence microbial communities in acute wound healing at days 0, 7, 14, 21 and 28, and to investigate their relationship to wound healing, using non-invasive quantitative devices. Metabolites were obtained using tissue extraction, sorbent and polydimethylsiloxane patches and analysed using GCMS. PCA of wound tissue metabolome clearly separated time points with 10 metabolites of 346 being involved in separation. Analysis of variance-simultaneous component analysis identified a statistical difference between the wound headspace metabolome, sites (P = 0.0024) and time points (P<0.0001), with 10 out of the 129 metabolites measured involved with this separation between sites and time points. A reciprocal relationship between Staphylococcus spp. and Propionibacterium spp. was observed at day 21 (P<0.05) with a statistical correlation between collagen and Propionibacterium (r = 0.417; P = 0.038) and Staphylococcus (r = -0.434; P = 0.03). Procrustes analysis showed a statistically significant similarity between wound headspace and tissue metabolome with non-invasive wound devices. This exploratory study demonstrates the temporal and dynamic nature of acute wound metabolome and microbiome presenting a novel class of biomarkers that correspond to wound healing, with further confirmatory studies now necessary.

The role of microbiota in tissue repair and regeneration

A comprehensive understanding of the human body endogenous microbiota is essential for acquiring an insight into the involvement of microbiota in tissue healing and regeneration process in order to enable development of biomaterials with a better integration with human body environment. Biomaterials used for biomedical applications are normally germ-free, and the human body as the host of the biomaterials is not germ-free. The complexity and role of the body microbiota in tissue healing/regeneration have been underestimated historically. Traditionally, studies aiming at the development of novel biomaterials had focused on the effects of environment within the target tissue, neglecting the signals generated from the microbiota and their impact on tissue regeneration. The significance of the human body microbiota in relation to metabolism, immune system, and consequently tissue regeneration has been recently realised and is a growing research field. This review summarises recent findings on the role of microbiota and mechanisms involved in tissue healing and regeneration, in particular skin, liver, bone, and nervous system regrowth and regeneration highlighting the potential new roles of microbiota for development of a new generation of biomaterials.

The triune of intestinal microbiome, genetics and inflammatory status and its impact on the healing of lower gastrointestinal anastomoses

Gastrointestinal resections are a common operation and most involve an anastomosis to rejoin the ends of the remaining bowel to restore gastrointestinal (GIT) continuity. While most joins heal uneventfully, in up to 26% of patients healing fails and an anastomotic leak (AL) develops. Despite advances in surgical technology and techniques, the rate of anastomotic leaks has not decreased over the last few decades raising the possibility that perhaps we do not yet fully understand the phenomenon of AL and are thus ill-equipped to prevent it. As in all complex conditions, it is necessary to isolate each different aspect of disease for interrogation of its specific role, but, as we hope to demonstrate in this article, it is a dangerous oversimplification to consider any single aspect as the full answer to the problem. Instead, consideration of important individual observations in parallel could illuminate the way forward towards a possibly simple solution amidst the complexity. This article details three aspects that we believe intertwine, and therefore should be considered together in wound healing within the GIT during postsurgical recovery: the microbiome, the host genetic make-up and their relationship to the perioperative inflammatory status. Each of these, alone or in combination, has been linked with various states of health and disease, and in combining these three aspects in the case of postoperative recovery from bowel resection, we may be nearer an answer to preventing anastomotic leaks than might have been thought just a few years ago.

Novel insight into the role of microbiota in colorectal surgery

Recent literature undeniably supports the idea that the microbiota has a strong influence on the healing process of an intestinal anastomosis. Understanding the mechanisms by which the bacterial community of the gut influences intestinal healing could open the door for new preventive and therapeutic approaches. Among the different mechanisms, data have shown that the production of specific reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the activation of specific formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) regulate intestinal wound healing. Evidence suggests that specific gut microbes such as Lactobacillus spp and Akkermansia muciniphila help to regulate healing processes through both ROS-dependent and FPR-dependent mechanisms. In this review, we will discuss the current knowledge and future perspectives concerning the impact of microbiota on wound healing. We will further review available evidence on whether mechanical bowel preparation and the use of specific antibiotics are beneficial or harmful procedures, an ongoing matter of debate. These practices have a profound effect on the gut microbiota composition at the level of both the mucosal and the luminal compartments. Therefore, a key question remains unanswered: should we continue to prepare the gut before surgical intervention? Current knowledge and data do not clearly support the use of one technique or another to avoid complications such as anastomotic leak. There is an urgent need for appropriate interventions with a deep microbiota analysis to investigate both the surgical technical benefits of a proper anastomosis compared with the potential effect of the gut microbes (beneficial vs harmful) on the processes of wound healing and anastomotic leakage reduction.

Cooperative Microbial Tolerance Behaviors in Host-Microbiota Mutualism

Animal defense strategies against microbes are most often thought of as a function of the immune system, the primary function of which is to sense and kill microbes through the execution of resistance mechanisms. However, this antagonistic view creates complications for our understanding of beneficial host-microbe interactions. Pathogenic microbes are described as employing a few common behaviors that promote their fitness at the expense of host health and fitness. Here, a complementary framework is proposed to suggest that, in addition to pathogens, beneficial microbes have evolved behaviors to manipulate host processes in order to promote their own fitness and do so through the promotion of host health and fitness. In this Perspective, I explore the idea that patterns or behaviors traditionally ascribed to pathogenic microbes are also employed by beneficial microbes to promote host tolerance defense strategies. Such strategies would promote host health without having a negative impact on microbial fitness and would thereby yield cooperative evolutionary dynamics that are likely required to drive mutualistic co-evolution of hosts and microbes.

Microbial inhibition of oral epithelial wound recovery: potential role for quorum sensing molecules?

Awareness of the impact of microbiota in both health and disease is growing. Using a new in vitro oral mucosa co-culture model, we recently showed a clear inhibition of epithelial wound healing in the presence of an oral microbial community. In this paper, we have used the same model in combination with specific oral microbial species to obtain a better insight into the role of the oral microbiota in wound healing. Monocultures of Klebsiellaoxytoca and Lactobacillus salivarius significantly inhibited wound healing with ~20%, whereas Streptococcus mitis and S. oralis enhanced the healing process with ~15% in 24 h. Yet, neither S. oralis or S. mitis were able to counteract the inhibitory effects from K.oxytoca on wound healing. Other tested microbial species had no effect on wound healing. Apart from this species-dependency, the inhibitory effect on wound healing depended on a microbial threshold concentration. Further mechanistic experiments with K.oxytoca excluded different microbial factors and hypothesized that quorum sensing molecules might play a role in the inter-kingdom signalling during wound healing. These results are important for the development of new strategies for the management of (infected) wounds and ulcerations.

Skin wound healing is accelerated and scarless in the absence of commensal microbiota

The commensal microbiota has a high impact on health and disease by modulating the development and homeostasis of host immune system. Immune cells are involved in virtually every aspect of the wound repair process; however, the impact of commensal microbiota on skin wound healing is largely unknown. In this study, we evaluated the influence of commensal microbiota on tissue repair of excisional skin wounds by using germ-free (GF) Swiss mice. We observed that macroscopic wound closure rate is accelerated in the absence of commensal microbiota. Accordantly, histologically assessed wound epithelization was accelerated in GF in comparison with conventional (CV) Swiss mice. The wounds of GF mice presented a significant decrease in neutrophil accumulation and an increase in mast cell and macrophage infiltration into wounds. Interestingly, alternatively activated healing macrophage-related genes were highly expressed in the wound tissue of GF mice. Moreover, levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, the angiogenic growth factor VEGF and angiogenesis were higher in the wound tissue of those mice. Conversely, scarring and levels of the profibrogenic factor TGF-β1 were greatly reduced in GF mice wounded skin when compared with CV mice. Of note, conventionalization of GF mice with CV microbiota restored wound closure rate, neutrophil and macrophage accumulation, cytokine production, and scarring to the same extent as CV mice. Overall, our findings suggest that, in the absence of any contact with microbiota, skin wound healing is accelerated and scarless, partially because of reduced accumulation of neutrophils, increased accumulation of alternatively activated healing macrophages, and better angiogenesis at wound sites.

Inflammasome-microbiota interplay in host physiologies

Host defense responses against microbes are most often thought of in terms of effectors of microbial destruction. However, recent evidence demonstrates that the more complex interactions between the microbiota and innate immune mechanisms, such as the inflammasome-mediated response, cannot be readily explained within just the traditional paradigms of microbial killing mechanisms. In this review, the concepts of both resistance and tolerance are applied to inflammasome-microbiota interactions, and the various physiological consequences of this interplay, including roles in inflammation, tissue repair, tumorigenesis, and metabolism, are discussed.

The microbiome in wound repair and tissue fibrosis

Bacterial colonization occurs in all wounds, chronic or acute, and the break in epithelium integrity that defines a wound impairs the forces that shape and constrain the microbiome at that site. This review highlights the interactions between bacterial communities in the wound and the ultimate resolution of the wound or development of fibrotic lesions. Chronic wounds support complex microbial communities comprising a wide variety of bacterial phyla, genera, and species, including some fastidious anaerobic bacteria not identified using culture-based methods. Thus, the complexity of bacterial communities in wounds has historically been underestimated. There are a number of intriguing possibilities to explain these results that may also provide novel insights into changes and adaptation of bacterial metabolic networks in inflamed and wounded mucosa, including the critical role of biofilm formation. It is well accepted that the heightened state of activation of host cells in a wound that is driven by the microbiota can certainly lead to detrimental effects on wound regeneration, but the microbiota of the wound may also have beneficial effects on wound healing. Studies in experimental systems have clearly demonstrated a beneficial effect for members of the gut microbiota on regulation of systemic inflammation, which could also impact wound healing at sites outside the gastrointestinal tract. The utilization of culture-independent microbiology to characterize the microbiome of wounds and surrounding mucosa has raised many intriguing questions regarding previously held notions about the cause and effect relationships between bacterial colonization and wound repair and mechanisms involved in this symbiotic relationship.

Role of the innate immune system and host-commensal mutualism

Host organisms live in intimate contact with indigenous microflora. The interactions between the host and commensal microbiota are highly complex and heterogeneous. A growing body of evidence indicates that commensal symbionts provide many benefits to the host physiology, particularly in the gastrointestinal system. The molecular mechanisms of the mutualistic interactions between the host and commensals are largely unknown but can be due either to bioactivity of the commensals or to the reaction of the host immune system to the commensal-derived products. Recent advances in our understanding of the innate immune system allow re-evaluation of some of the older findings regarding the mechanisms of benefits conferred by microflora. Here we review the examples of the benefits of host-commensal interactions that are due to recognition of commensal microbial products by the host innate immune system.

Vitamin A deficiency impairs colonic healing but not adhesion formation in germ-free and conventional rats

Vitamin A is well recognized as a factor of major importance in epithelial and connective tissue repair mechanisms. Recently it was shown that vitamin A deficiency caused overgrowth and translocation of intestinal bacteria in rats. The aim of this study was to investigate the healing of colonic anastomoses and formation of postsurgical adhesions in vitamin A-deficient germ-free and conventional rats. Fourteen germ-free and 10 conventional rats were allocated to four groups: germ-free rats not given vitamin A, germ-free rats given vitamin A, conventional rats not given vitamin A, and conventional rats given vitamin A. All rats underwent surgery for colonic anastomosis. Seven days afterward, they were euthanized, and the bursting pressure of colonic anastomosis and formation of peritoneal adhesions were evaluated. The bursting pressures in groups not given vitamin A were lower than in groups given vitamin A. The adhesion scores in germ-free groups were lower than in conventional groups. These findings demonstrated that vitamin A had an important role in healing of colonic anastomoses whether in the presence or absence of intestinal flora, and that intestinal bacteria had a greater effect than vitamin A on formation of postsurgical adhesions. This may suggest that the mechanism of healing of colonic anastomoses differs from that of postsurgical adhesion formation.

Experimental study of the influence of intestinal flora on the healing of intestinal anastomoses

BACKGROUND

The beneficial effects of the normal intestinal flora on wound healing in the skin have already been confirmed, and this study attempted to elucidate the influence of the intestinal flora on the healing process in intestinal anastomoses.

METHODS

Five groups of rats were studied: germ-free, conventional, monocontaminated with Lactobacillus acidophilus La5 or Escherichia coli X7 and ex-germ-free (conventionalized). All animals underwent ileal and colonic resections followed by anastomoses. Seven days later they were killed and the bursting pressure and hydroxyproline concentration of the anastomoses were measured. The microbiological status of the animals was confirmed weekly.

RESULTS

No bacteria were detected in the germ-free rats and no other bacteria were found in the monocontaminated animals. Conventional rats had a significantly higher anastomotic bursting pressure both in the ileum compared with rats monocontaminated with L. acidophilus, and in the colon compared with germ-free rats. The ex-germ-free rats also showed a significantly higher bursting pressure than germ-free animals and rats monocontaminated with either L. acidophilus or E. coli in the ileum and colon.

CONCLUSION

The presence of the intestinal flora enhanced the healing of intestinal anastomoses. The data suggest that this effect depends on differences in the types of bacteria in the intestine.