Prostatic acid phosphatase and prostate specific antigen in liver disease

Is Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen a Reliable Prostate Cancer Marker in Liver Transplant Candidates

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we aimed to determine whether the prostate-specific antigen level is a reliable marker of prostate cancer in patients with hepatic insufficiency, based on evaluation of alterations in serum prostate-specific antigen levels after liver transplant in patients with hepatic insufficiency.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medical records of all patients who underwent liver transplant at our hospital between January 2003 and June 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Male patients who were > 40 years old with available pre- and posttransplant serum total prostate-specific antigen levels were included in the study.

RESULTS

Our study included 36 male patients with a mean age of 54.6 ± 5.3 years (range, 45-73 y) at the time of liver transplant. The mean pretransplant serum total prostate-specific antigen level was 0.75 ± 0.77 ng/mL, which was significantly lower than the mean posttransplant level of 1.29 ± 1.57 ng/mL (P < .05). The pretransplant serum total prostate-specific antigen level was measured a mean of 4.9 ± 5.4 months before liver transplant versus a mean 27.6 ± 16.3 months after transplant. Prostate-specific antigen velocity was 0.2 ng/mL/year. Biochemical tests of liver function, including the mean serum levels of bilirubin, international normalized ratio, and albumin, were normal after liver transplant at 1.37 ± 2.33 mg/dL, 1.22 ± 0.36, and 4.16 ± 0.69 g/dL, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum prostate-specific antigen levels may decrease in patients with hepatic insufficiency/cirrhosis; therefore, a low serum prostate-specific antigen level may not be a reliable marker for excluding prostate cancer in such patients. Transplant surgeons and clinicians must be aware of this so that all male transplant candidates > 40 years old are evaluated via digital rectal examination, regardless of the serum prostate-specific antigen level.

Infectious mononucleosis, other infections and prostate-specific antigen concentration as a marker of prostate involvement during infection

Although Epstein-Barr virus has been detected in prostate tissue, no associations have been observed with prostate cancer in the few studies conducted to date. One possible reason for these null findings may be use of cumulative exposure measures that do not inform the timing of infection, i.e., childhood versus adolescence/early adulthood when infection is more likely to manifest as infectious mononucleosis (IM). We sought to determine the influence of young adult-onset IM on the prostate by measuring prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a marker of prostate inflammation/damage among U.S. military members. We defined IM cases as men diagnosed with IM from 1998 to 2003 (n = 55) and controls as men without an IM diagnosis (n = 255). We selected two archived serum specimens for each participant, the first collected after diagnosis for cases and one randomly selected from 1998 to 2003 for controls (index), as well as the preceding specimen (preindex). PSA was measured in each specimen. To explore the specificity of our findings for prostate as opposed to systemic inflammation, we performed a post hoc comparison of other infectious disease cases without genitourinary involvement (n = 90) and controls (n = 220). We found that IM cases were more likely to have a large PSA rise than controls (≥ 20 ng/mL: 19.7% versus 8.8%, p = 0.027; ≥ 40% rise: 25.7% versus 9.4%, p = 0.0021), as were other infectious disease cases (25.7% versus 14.0%, p = 0.020; 27.7% versus 18.0%, p = 0.092). These findings suggest that, in addition to rising because of prostate infection, PSA may also rise because of systemic inflammation, which could have implications for PSA interpretation in older men.

The investigation of total PSA, free PSA, and free/total PSA ratio in patients with liver cirrhosis patients according to Child-Pugh score

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA), free PSA (fPSA), and free/total PSA (fPSA/tPSA) ratio in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) according to the severity of hepatic insufficiency.

METHODS

Eighty-two male patients with LC were studied. The severity of liver disease was categorized by Child-Pugh score (Child-Pugh A, B, and C). Forty-two age-matched healthy subjects were used as a control group. The tPSA, fPSA, fPSA/tPSA ratio, total prostate volume (TPV), total testosterone (TT), and total protein (TP) were measured. The LC group was compared with the control group in terms of these parameters. In addition, intra-comparison and inter-comparison was made between all the Child-Pugh groups and normal subjects, in terms of these parameters.

RESULTS

The tPSA and fPSA levels in LC cases, Child-Pugh A, Child-Pugh B, and Child-Pugh C groups were significantly decreased compared with the control group. The ratio of fPSA/tPSA in the LC subjects and Child-Pugh A groups significantly increased compared with the control group. TT, TP levels, and TPV in patients with LC were significantly lower compared with the control group and the results were significantly correlated with the Child-Pugh score.

CONCLUSION

The present study reveals that tPSA and fPSA were decreased in patients with LC in comparison to healthy subjects in terms of 3 mechanisms. First, it might be due to shrunken prostatic volume. Second, it also resulted in decreased levels of testosterone because of the abnormality of hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis. Third, it might be the diminished serum protein level in the composition of the PSA.

Serum free and total prostate-specific antigen levels in patients with liver disease

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of liver diseases on serum free prostate-specific antigen (fPSA) levels, total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) levels, and fPSA/tPSA ratios.

METHODS

Serum concentrations of tPSA and fPSA were measured in 18 men with histologically confirmed liver cirrhosis, 20 men with histologically proved chronic hepatitis, and 20 healthy men. All patients underwent a standard urologic evaluation, including history, physical examination, urine analysis, serum fPSA and tPSA determinations, and liver function tests (serum bilirubin, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, and serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase).

RESULTS

Patients with liver cirrhosis had slightly lower fPSA levels than did control subjects or patients with chronic hepatitis, but these differences did not reach statistical significance. tPSA levels also were not significantly different among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In the presence of liver disease, despite the limited liver reserve, tPSA and fPSA are specific and reliable markers in the clinical management of prostatic diseases in this population. This result should be taken into account when serum concentrations of fPSA, tPSA, and the fPSA/tPSA ratio are evaluated in patients with liver disease.