[Complications in 283 cruciate ligament replacement operations with free patellar tendon transplantation. Modification by surgical technique and surgery timing]

Delaying anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for more than 3 or 6 months results in lower risk of revision surgery

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to investigate the risk of revision surgery when delaying anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) past 3 months or 6 months after injury.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 30,280 patients with isolated ACLR were identified in the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Registry and divided into four groups; ACLR < 3 months, > 3 months, < 6 months, or > 6 months after injury. Primary outcome was revision surgery and secondary outcome were objective and subjective clinical outcome. The 2 year relative risk, crude, and adjusted hazard ratio (HR) were calculated.

RESULTS

Comparing ACLR < 3 months to ACLR > 3 months of injury the 2 year relative risk of revision surgery was found to be 1.81 (95% CI 1.46-2.23; P < 0.001) with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.27 (95% CI 1.12-1.44; P < 0.001). Comparing ACLR < 6 months to ACLR > 6 months of injury the 2 year relative risk of revision surgery was found to be 1.61 (95% CI 1.34-1.92; P < 0.001) with an adjusted HR of 1.27 (95% CI 1.15-1.40; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The risk of revision ACLR surgery was found to be increased when ACLR was performed within 3 months or 6 months of injury compared with later surgery. The 1 year postoperative objective knee laxity and the subjective patient-related outcome was found to be without a clinically significant difference; however, those with early ACLR (< 3 months or < 6 months) were found to have a higher activity level 1 year postoperatively. The information about increased risk of revision when having early surgery should be informed to patients when deciding timing of ACLR treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Arthroscopic Lysis of Adhesions for Arthrofibrosis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Arthrofibrosis (AF) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains a challenge. There is a paucity of data on arthroscopic interventions for AF after ACLR.

PURPOSE

To (1) describe the patient, injury, and surgical characteristics and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of those requiring an arthroscopic intervention for loss of motion after ACLR and (2) compare outcomes between patients undergoing an early intervention (within 3 months) versus those undergoing a late intervention (after 3 months).

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Patients with a history of ACLR and a subsequent operative procedure for postoperative AF at a single institution between 2000 and 2018 were retrospectively identified. Arthroscopic interventions included lysis of adhesions, capsular release with or without manipulation under anesthesia, and excision of cyclops lesions. Patients were excluded if they had a knee dislocation or multiple-ligament injury, a periarticular fracture, or less than 2-year follow-up from the arthroscopic intervention. PROs including the Tegner activity score, visual analog scale pain score, and International Knee Documentation Committee score as well as knee range of motion (ROM) were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients were included with a mean age of 27.2 years (range, 11.0-63.8 years) at surgery and a mean follow-up of 10.0 years (range, 2.9-20.7 years). The mean preoperative flexion and extension were 102° (range, 40°-150°) and 8° (range, 0°-25°), respectively. The mean postoperative flexion and extension were 131° (range, 110° to 150°) and 0° (range, -10° to 5°), respectively. After the arthroscopic intervention, the mean ROM improved from 94° (range, 40°-140°) preoperatively to 131° (range, 107°-152°) at final follow-up (P < .001), and the visual analog scale pain score improved from 3.0 preoperatively to 1.2 postoperatively (P = .001). Overall, 13 patients (32.5%) underwent an intervention within 3 months and 27 (67.5%) after 3 months. The early intervention group had a higher postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee score compared with the late intervention group (86.8 vs 71.7, respectively; P = .035).

CONCLUSION

An arthroscopic intervention for AF after ACLR successfully improved knee ROM and pain. Patients who underwent either early or late surgery obtained satisfactory motion and function, although improved PROs were observed when the intervention occurred within 3 months of the primary procedure.

Anticoagulant Usage After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Associated With Increased Rate of Manipulation Under Anesthesia

BACKGROUND

Arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a notable but uncommon complication of ACLR. To improve range of motion after ACLR, aggressive physical therapy, arthroscopic/open lysis of adhesions, and revision surgery are currently used. Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is also a reasonable choice for an appropriate subset of patients with inadequate range of motion after ACLR. Recently, the correlation between anticoagulant usage and arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty has become an area of interest. The purpose of this study was to determine whether anticoagulant use has a similar effect on the incidence of MUA after ACLR.

METHODS

The Mariner data set of the PearlDiver database was used to conduct this retrospective cohort study. Patients with an isolated ACLR were identified by using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients were then stratified by MUA within 2 years of ACLR, and the use of postoperative anticoagulation was identified. In addition, patient demographics, medical comorbidities, and timing of ACLR were recorded. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to model independent risk factors for MUA.

RESULTS

We identified 216,147 patients who underwent isolated ACLR. Of these patients, 3,494 (1.62%) underwent MUA within 2 years. Patients who were on anticoagulants after ACLR were more likely to require an MUA (odds ratio [OR]: 2.181; P < 0.001), specifically low-molecular-weight heparin (OR: 2.651; P < 0.001), warfarin (OR: 1.529; P < 0.001), and direct factor Xa inhibitors (OR: 1.957; P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

In conclusion, arthrofibrosis after ACLR is associated with the use of preoperative or postoperative thromboprophylaxis. Healthcare providers should be aware of increased stiffness among these patients and treat them aggressively.

Return to Sport Composite Test After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (K-STARTS): Factors Affecting Return to Sport Test Score in a Retrospective Analysis of 676 Patients

BACKGROUND

Return to sport (RTS) to the preinjury level is the main purpose after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction but the factors affecting the RTS are not completely known. Knee Santy Athletic Return to Sport (K-STARTS) is a composite test designed to assess readiness for RTS after ACL reconstruction.

PURPOSE

To determine the key factors that influence K-STARTS scores in a large cohort of patients after ACL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was undertaken. All patients who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery between March 2016 and May 2017 and also had a K-STARTS assessment at 6 months postoperatively were included. To identify factors influencing the K-STARTS score, an analysis of variance was performed. Age, sex, sports level, delay between injury and surgery, concomitant lesions, graft type, additional lateral tenodesis procedure, and participation in the RTS program were analyzed to identify factors influencing the K-STARTS score.

RESULTS

A total of 676 patients were included in the study. The K-STARTS score was significantly higher in male patients than in female patients (13.9 vs 12.4; P < 0.001), in younger patients (those aged <30 years vs older patients; 14.2 vs 12; P < 0.001), ACL reconstructions performed with hamstring tendon autografts compared with bone-patellar tendon-bone (13.5 vs 13.1; P = 0.03) and in those who completed a specific RTS program in addition to standard rehabilitation, compared with those who did not participate (17.1 vs 13.1; P < 0.001). However, the only factor that significantly influenced the K-STARTS score beyond the minimal detectable change threshold was the completion of the additional RTS program. The preinjury frequency of sports participation, whether the dominant limb was injured, time from injury to surgery, the presence of associated meniscal injuries, and whether a lateral tenodesis was performed did not significantly influence the K-STARTS score.

CONCLUSION

Completion of a specific RTS program, in addition to standard rehabilitation, was the most important factor influencing the K-STARTS composite functional and psychological RTS test score at 6 months after ACL reconstruction.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study shows that the completion of a specific RTS program affects positively the RTS test score at 6 months after ACL reconstruction.

Outcomes Following Arthroscopic Single and Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Supported by the Comprehensive Early Rehabilitation Program (CERP)

Background

The aim of this study was to compare the level of functional condition in patients who had rehabilitation with the comprehensive early rehabilitation program (CERP) following either single bundle (SB) or double bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using semitendinosus-gracilis tendon graft (ST-G) method. We hypothesized that 12 weeks after reconstruction followed by a rehabilitation program, there would be a difference in clinical results and functional activity between patients.

Material/Methods

This study included 94 patients who had rehabilitation with CERP after knee surgery for a knee injury from a recreational sport. There were 49 patients in Group 1 (mean age, 36.5 years) who had CERP after SB ACLR, and 45 patients in Group 2 (mean age, 35.6 years) who had CERP after DB ACLR. Functional condition was tested using the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, and knee stability was measured using KT-2000. The first examination was performed before CERP and the second examination was performed 12 weeks later.

Results

The level of functional condition in both groups was similar before rehabilitation with CERP, with no significant difference (P<0.958) and was considered relatively low. In the second examination, 12 weeks after starting CERP, the patients improved in both groups. The improvement was larger in the SB ACLR Group 1 than in the DB ACLR Group 2. The difference was significant (P<0.005). However, the patients in Group 2 achieved better knee stability scores in the KT-2000 examination than the patients in Group 1. The difference was significant (P=0.035).

Conclusions

We found that the patients from both groups after 12 weeks of CERP achieved an improvement in stability and functional activity within normal limits. However, SB ACLR was more effective than DB ACLR in terms of the level of functionality achieved with CERP but was less effective in terms of knee stability.

Open knee dislocation with a patellar tendon rupture: Result of staged surgical repair

Knee dislocation with concomitant multiligament injury is a rare and devastating injury. We report the successful repair of a rare case of open knee dislocation with concomitant multiligament injury and patellar tendon rupture of an 18-year-old male due to a motorcycle accident. The patient presented with an open wound running parallel to the knee joint line and patellar tendon rupture with full exposure of the cartilage of the distal femur. Staged surgical management including the application of a ring-type external fixator with a hinged joint, lateral collateral ligament repair, medial collateral ligament reconstruction using autogenous hamstring tendon, and joint release was performed. Range of movement was recovered to 0 degrees of knee extension and 80 degrees of knee flexion, and extension lag was negative. The Lysholm score of the patient was recovered to 92. The patient was able to return to work in the construction field 2 years after sustaining the injury. The patient had no complaint of pain and was able to resume construction work, even though reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament was not performed. The application of a hinged ring-type external fixation device might play a key role in early range of movement restoration and to maintain the reduced position and acceptable recovery of the posterior cruciate ligament injury without the need for reconstructive surgery. This report is the first to describe the safety and effectiveness of staged surgical management for the repair of open knee dislocation with concomitant multiligament injury and patellar tendon rupture. However, further studies with longer follow-up periods will be needed to observe the development of osteoarthritis or weakness of the knee. Staged surgical management is a safe and effective procedure for repairing an open knee dislocation with concomitant multiligament injury and patellar tendon rupture.

Sports-specific differences in postsurgical infections after arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

Post-operative infection after arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a rare but severe complication, particularly for young and active patients. It is unclear whether the prevalence of knee infection is correlated with the type of sports or the level of performance.

METHODS

From 2008 to 2012, the internal single-centre ACL registry of the FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence Regensburg was retrospectively screened for sex, age, time between isolated primary ACL rupture and surgery, surgical technique, rate of infection after ACL reconstruction and the type of sports practised.

RESULTS

In total, 4801 ACL reconstructions had been conducted over 5 years, 4579 in amateur and 221 in professional athletes. After application of the exclusion criteria, 1809 athletes with ACL reconstruction were analysed regarding postsurgical infection and the type of sports practised. Professionals and amateurs did not significantly differ with regard to infection rates (n.s.) but in the timing of ACL repair (p < 0.001). Eleven of 1130 football players had developed postsurgical infection after ACL reconstruction (1.0%) in contrast to 557 skiers and snowboarders without infection (p = 0.02). The timing of ACL repair did not differ between the different types of sports (n.s.). Staphylococcus aureus and epidermidis were the predominant detected bacteria. All patients were hospitalised and successfully treated with arthroscopic lavage and antibiotic medication.

CONCLUSION

ACL infections showed sports-related differences. Athletes practising summer outdoor sports such as football had a significantly higher risk of infection after ACL reconstruction than winter sports athletes. No difference was found between professional and amateur athletes. Relevant prevention strategies for postsurgical ACL infections should consider influencing patient factors such as the type of sports activity and attendant circumstances.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction is best treated in a step-wise approach with early recognition and intervention: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Arthrofibrosis is the most common post-operative complication of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Risk factors and management strategies for arthrofibrosis remain unclear. The purpose of this review was to: (a) describe existing definitions of arthrofibrosis, and (b) characterize the management strategies and outcomes of arthrofibrosis treatment.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed were searched from database inception to search date (March 21, 2016) and screened in duplicate for relevant studies. Data regarding patient demographics, indications, index surgery, management strategy, and outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies of primarily level IV evidence (88%) were included. A total of 647 patients (648 knees) with a mean age of 28.2 ± 1.8 years (range 14-62 years) were treated for arthrofibrosis following ACL reconstruction and followed for a mean 30.1 ± 16.9 months (range 2 months-9.6 years). Definitions of arthrofibrosis varied widely and included subjective definitions and the Shelbourne classification system. Patients were treated by one or more of: arthroscopic arthrolysis (570 patients), manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) (153 patients), oral corticosteroids (31 patients), physiotherapy (81 patients), drop-casting (17 patients), epidural therapy combined with inpatient physiotherapy (six patients), and intra-articular interleukin-1 antagonist injection (four patients). All studies reported improvement in range of motion post-operatively, with statistically significant improvement reported for 306 patients (six studies, p range <0.001 to =0.05), and one study (18 patients) reporting significantly better results if arthrofibrosis was treated within 8 months of reconstruction (p < 0.03). The greatest improvements for extension loss were seen with drop-casting (mean 6.2° ± 0.6° improvement), whereas MUA produced the greatest improvement for flexion deficit (mean 47.8° ± 3.3° improvement).

CONCLUSIONS

Arthrofibrosis is poorly defined and outcome measures range varies widely. Amongst the studies included in this review, arthrofibrosis was most commonly managed surgically by arthroscopic arthrolysis, and most patients showed at least some improvement, including six studies that reported statistically significant change in ROM. In studies that used a step-wise approach to treating arthrofibrosis, more than half of patients were successfully treated without an operation. A more well-defined concept of arthrofibrosis, along with large, prospective studies will provide a clearer understanding of how to describe and manage this complication. The issue of arthrofibrosis following ACL reconstruction is clinically relevant as it represents a common complication of a commonly performed operation that nonetheless remains poorly defined and without clear treatment guidelines.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic Review of Level III and IV Studies, Level IV.

Impact of surgical timing on the outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study is the comparison of acute ACL reconstruction with or without meniscus repair within 48 h after injury and a delayed surgery during the inflammation-free interval. It was hypothesized that acute ACL reconstruction results in inferior patient reported outcomes and higher frequency of range of motion deficits.

METHODS

The effect of acute (within 48 h) and delayed (during the inflammation-free interval) ACL surgery was prospectively studied on 160 consecutive patients with ACL injury between January 2010 and December 2011. Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate patients with an additional meniscus repair separately from isolated ACL surgeries. During the study period, partial meniscectomies were recorded to evaluate time dependent meniscus reparability. Patient reported outcomes, objective IKDC and manual stability measurements were documented during the 24-month follow-up period. The Pearson Chi-squared test was used to evaluate objective outcome measures. The Mann-Whitney U test was performed to analyse the results of patient reported outcomes. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

For patients who underwent isolated ACL reconstruction, no statistical significant difference was observed at any time point regarding objective and subjective outcome measures. Significantly fewer patients who underwent acute combined ACL reconstruction and meniscus repair had an extension deficit between 3° and 5° at 12 months following surgery (3.7 vs. 22.2 %, p < 0.05). No difference regarding cyclops removal, re-injury of ACL or meniscus was found between the two surgical timing groups. Further, surgical timing did not influence the reparability of the meniscus.

CONCLUSION

An acute ACL reconstruction within 48 h is preferable in highly active patients or competitive athletes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective cohort study, Level II.

Current Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Review

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is an accepted and established surgical technique for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and is now being practiced across the globe in increasing numbers. Although most patients get good to excellent results in the short-term after ACLR, its consequences in the long-term in prevention or acceleration of knee osteoarthritis (OA) are not yet well-defined. Still, there are many debatable issues related to ACLR, such as the appropriate timing of surgery, graft selection, fixation methods of the graft, operative techniques, rehabilitation after surgery, and healing augmentation techniques. Most surgeons prefer not to wait long after an ACL injury to do an ACLR, as delayed reconstruction is associated with secondary damages to the intra- and periarticular structures of the knee. Autografts are the preferred choice of graft in primary ACLR, and hamstring tendons are the most popular amongst surgeons. Single bundle ACLR is being practiced by the majority, but double bundle ACLR is getting popular due to its theoretical advantage of providing more anatomical reconstruction. A preferred construct is the interference fixation (Bio-screw) at the tibial site and the suspensory method of fixation at the femoral site. In a single bundle hamstring graft, a transportal approach for creating a femoral tunnel has recently become more popular than the trans-tibial technique. Various healing augmentation techniques, including the platelet rich plasma (PRP), have been tried after ACLR, but there is still no conclusive proof of their efficacy. Accelerated rehabilitation is seemingly more accepted immediately after ACLR.

Effects of intraarticular IL1-Ra for acute anterior cruciate ligament knee injury: a randomized controlled pilot trial (NCT00332254)

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of intraarticular IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear.

METHODS

Eleven patients with acute ACL tear confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were randomized to receive a single intraarticular injection of IL-1Ra (anakinra 150 mg, n = 6) or equal volume of saline placebo (1 ml, n = 5). The double-blinded treatment was administered a mean 2 weeks after injury. Synovial fluid (SF) (n = 9 patients) and sera (all patients) were available at baseline (prior to injection) and immediately prior to surgery (mean 35 days later) and analyzed for SF IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-1Ra and serum hyaluronan (HA), an indicator of synovial inflammation. The primary outcome, standardized Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire, was obtained at 0 (baseline), 4, and 14 days after injection.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, the IL-1Ra group had substantially greater improvement in key outcomes over 14 days (KOOS pain P = 0.001; activities of daily living P = 0.0015; KOOS sports function P = 0.0026; KOOS quality of life (QOL) P = 0.0048; and total KOOS P < 0.0001). There were no adverse reactions in either group. SF IL-1α (P = 0.05) and serum HA (P = 0.03), but not IL-1β, or IL-1Ra, decreased significantly in the IL-1Ra but not the placebo treated patients. Compared with placebo, IL-1α was borderline significantly different in the IL-1Ra treated group (P = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Administered within the first month following severe knee injury, IL-1Ra reduced knee pain and improved function over a 2-week interval. This promising proof of concept study provides a new paradigm for studies of acute joint injury and suggests that a larger follow-up study is warranted.

Intra-articular Anakinra for the Treatment of Persistent Inflammation and Arthrofibrosis following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Purpose

Postoperative inflammation and arthrofibrosis remain difficult problems following ACL reconstruction. Interleukin-1 (IL-1) is a potent driver of intra-articular inflammation and arthrofibrosis following injury and surgery. Anakinra (Kineret, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA) is an IL-1 receptor antagonist. We hypothesize that postoperative intra-articular anakinra use decreases inflammation and subsequent arthrofibrosis, reducing the need for arthroscopic debridement and manipulation under anesthesia.

Methods

Four patients (ages 15-56) who were treated with anakinra for persistent postoperative inflammation and scarring within 4 months of ACL reconstruction were retrospectively reviewed. Anakinra was utilized when patients were unable to obtain full extension and at least 90° of flexion 1 month postoperatively in association with persistent effusions or decreased patellar mobility.

Results

Anakinra injection was performed between 36 and 97 days postsurgery. All four reported improvements in range of motion and decreased pain and effusions within 10 days of injection. One patient, who did not receive anakinra until more than 3 months postsurgery, required eventual arthroscopic debridement of a cyclops lesion but none of the patients required frank lysis of adhesions or manipulation under anesthesia. No adverse reactions to anakinra occurred.

Conclusion

Based on previous experience, we believe that all of these patients would have required arthroscopic debridement of scar tissue and manipulation under anesthesia to regain motion were not for the anakinra treatment. Clearly, the concept of IL-1 inhibition in the postoperative knee requires further research, but early results are promising for this unique treatment of a difficult clinical problem.

Deep vein thrombosis and thromboprophylaxis in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

There is no clear evidence in the literature regarding the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Literature also lacks on the recommendations on thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing elective arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. We conducted a prospective analysis to assess incidence of DVT in patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

120 consecutive patients with MRI proven ACL injury who were operated for arthroscopic ACL reconstruction were enrolled in this prospective study. None of the patients had risk factors (on history) for DVT, and all were below the age of 45 years. All cases were operated upon by a single surgeon and a standard rehabilitation regime was followed. The patients underwent clinical examination and screening (Doppler ultrasonography/venous scan) for any DVT, on the day prior to surgery, day of discharge (Day 3) and at 4 weeks postsurgery. None of the patients received any form of thromboprophylaxis against DVT.

RESULTS

One hundred and twelve patients (61 males and 51 females) completed the study. The average age was 31.6 years (range 24-42 years). All patients underwent arthroscopic assisted ACL reconstruction surgery within 3 weeks of the injury. Two patients (males) in the series had Doppler venous scan proven DVT. One patient was asymptomatic but the screening Doppler picked up the DVT on the third postoperative day. The other patient was symptomatic at 12 weeks with pain and swelling in the leg and had ultrasound -proven DVT.

CONCLUSION

In our study the incidence of deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction is 1.78%. We do not recommend routine thromboprophylaxis in patients, who are not high risk candidates for thrombosis and are of less than 45 years, in patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction, with early postoperative rehabilitation.

New developments in osteoarthritis. Posttraumatic osteoarthritis: pathogenesis and pharmacological treatment options

Joint trauma can lead to a spectrum of acute lesions, including osteochondral fractures, ligament or meniscus tears and damage to the articular cartilage. This is often associated with intraarticular bleeding and causes posttraumatic joint inflammation. Although the acute symptoms resolve and some of the lesions can be surgically repaired, joint injury triggers a chronic remodeling process in cartilage and other joint tissues that ultimately manifests as osteoarthritis in a majority of cases. The objective of the present review is to summarize information on pathogenetic mechanisms involved in the acute and chronic consequences of joint trauma and discuss potential pharmacological interventions. The focus of the review is on the early events that follow joint trauma since therapies for posttraumatic joint inflammation are not available and this represents a unique window of opportunity to limit chronic consequences.

Early versus delayed surgery for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

There is no consensus in the literature regarding the optimal timing of surgical reconstruction of the ruptured anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Previous authors have suggested that early reconstruction may facilitate an early return to work or sport but may increase the incidence of post-operative complications such as arthrofibrosis. This study systematically reviewed the literature to determine whether ACL reconstruction should be performed acutely following rupture. Medline, CINAHL, AMED, EMBASE databases and grey literature were reviewed with a meta-analysis of pooled mean differences where appropriate. Six papers including 370 ACL reconstructions were included. Early ACL reconstructions were considered as those undertaken within a mean of 3 weeks post-injury; delayed ACL reconstructions were those undertaken a minimum of 6 weeks post-injury. We found there was no difference in clinical outcome between patients who underwent early compared to delayed ACL reconstruction. However, this conclusion is based on the current literature which has substantial methodological limitations.

Intérêts des évaluations isocinétiques du genou avant et après reconstruction du ligament croisé antérieur chez le footballeur

AIM

The aim of this study was to analyse the evolution of the isokinetic performance of the knee flexor and extensor muscles in soccer players before and after intra-articular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (Kennet-Jones).

METHODS

Two isokinetic evaluations were carried out before surgery and after rehabilitation (i.e. 4 months later) in 18 soccer players.

RESULTS

The initial evaluation showed that the stabilizing muscles of the knee were affected differently after lesion of the external anterior crossed ligament. At the opposite of the flexor muscles, the performance of the knee extensor muscles of the injured leg was significantly reduced as compared with that of the healthy leg (peak torque at 90 degrees /s, -16%; power at 180 degrees /s, -14%; total work at 240 degrees /s, -11%). Even if 4 months after surgery, this deficit was accentuated (peak torque at 90 degrees /s, -26%; power at 180 degrees /s, -23%; total work at 240 degrees /s, -19%), the preoperative results of the knee extensor muscle do not condition the postoperative performance.

CONCLUSION

After a rupture of the external anterior crossed ligament, a regular program of isokinetic evaluation of the knee seems to be relevant in the follow-up of the wounded athlete. The evaluation before surgery can be used as reference, and from a psychological point of view, this evaluation can create confidence in the athlete during hospitalization. A second evaluation 4 months after surgery can be used to quantify the muscular deficit to direct the exercises of rehabilitation.

Arthrofibrosis following ACL reconstruction--reasons and outcome

INTRODUCTION

Arthrofibrosis is a complication that severely influences the clinical outcome after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. This retrospective clinical study analyses risk factors and outcome after arthrolysis in a large population.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two hundred twenty-three patients who had undergone arthrolysis after ACL reconstruction were examined. Range of motion (ROM) was reduced due to arthrofibrosis of the joint in 70% (n=156). Other reasons, such as cyclops syndrome or osteoarthritis were found in 30% (n=67). The mean time interval between arthrolysis and follow-up was 4.29 years. We recorded timing of surgery, additional injuries, state of the knee before reconstruction, range of motion, pain during rehabilitation, beginning, duration and type of rehabilitation, severity and etiology of joint stiffness and the time between ACL reconstruction and revision. The present state of the knee was documented using the IKDC form.

RESULTS

A significant correlation of arthrofibrosis and preoperative irritation (p<0.001), preoperative limited ROM (p=0.001), perioperative pain (p=0.046) and early beginning of muscle training (p=0.064) was found. Combination of a remaining loss of extension and development of degenerative joint disease was also significant (p=0.001). The decrease of sports activity compared with the level before ACL injury was highly significant (p<0.001). The criteria to minimize the risk of arthrofibrosis and the optimal timing of arthrolysis are pointed out.

Prevention of venous thromboembolism after knee arthroscopy with low-molecular weight heparin (reviparin): Results of a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a common, important complication of major orthopaedic surgery, particularly knee arthroplasty. Knee arthroscopy is increasingly performed on an outpatient basis. Few reports have elucidated the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing arthroscopic surgery receiving no prophylaxis. The objective of the present trial was to evaluate the risk of VTE in those patients and to determine efficacy and safety of a low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in preventing VTE.

TYPE OF STUDY

This is the first controlled randomized trial using objective diagnostic methods with blinded outcome assessment to reveal the incidence of VTE in outpatient arthroscopy and determine efficacy and safety of a LMWH (reviparin sodium) in preventing VTE in these patients.

METHODS

There were 262 patients undergoing elective knee arthroscopy prospectively randomized to receive either no treatment or reviparin once daily subcutaneously for 7 to 10 days. The blindly assessed primary outcome measure was the incidence of DVT detected by compression color-coded sonography. Both groups were comparable with regard to demographics and baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

239 patients were evaluable (122 no treatment, 117 receiving LMWH). 6 DVT were detected - 5 in the control group (5/117 - 4.1%) and only one in the active treatment group (1/116 - 0.85%). This particular patient had a low level of protein C and a subnormal level of protein S. The odds ratio of 4.95 approximates a relative risk reduction of about 80%. Treatment with reviparin was safe and well tolerated. There was no major bleeding, four patients with minor bleedings. One patient had a transitory fall in platelet count below 100 giga-particles/L without any clinical symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing knee arthroscopy have a moderate risk of VTE and effective prophylaxis can be achieved with LMWH (reviparin).