[Growth hormone release in unstable diabetes: tests with saline, arginine, glucagon, and epinephrine (author's transl)]

Hypothalamic control of growth hormone (GH) secretion in type I diabetic men: effect of the combined administration of GH-releasing hormone and hexarelin, a novel GHRP-6 analog

Insulin dependent (type I) diabetic patients show abnormal growth hormone (GH) secretion. Hexarelin is an analog of GHRP-6 which releases GH in part via somatostatin inhibition. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of hexarelin and GHRH, administered either alone or in combination, on GH secretion in 10 type I diabetic and 7 normal men. All the subjects were administered: 1) human GHRH (1-29) NH2 100 micrograms i.v. bolus at 0 min; 2) hexarelin 100 micrograms i.v. bolus at 0 min; 3) hexarelin 100 micrograms + hGHRH 100 micrograms i.v. bolus at 0 min. In type I diabetic patients significantly greater GH responses to GHRH and hexarelin have been observed with normal subjects. Hexarelin caused a significantly (p < 0.05) greater GH response as compared to GHRH in both diabetic and control subjects. After the administration of hexarelin+GHRH, a significant increase in both GH absolute and peak levels as compared to hexarelin or GHRH alone was found in all the subjects. However, the GH responses to the combined stimuli were not significantly different in diabetics as compared to normals; moreover, the interaction of GHRH and hexarelin was synergistic in controls and additive in diabetics. We hypothesize that a reduction in the hypothalamic somatostatin inhibitory tone combined with increased pituitary GH production may be responsible for the pattern of the GH responses to hexarelin and GHRH observed in our type I diabetic patients.

Effect of pyridostigmine on the growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone in lean and obese type II Diabetic patients

A suppressed growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) in both lean and overweight type II diabetics has been reported. Pyridostigmine (PD), an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, elicits GH secretion when administered alone and enhances the GH response to GHRH in normal subjects. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of PD on GHRH-stimulated GH secretion in both lean and obese type II diabetic patients. We studied 16 patients with type II diabetes mellitus (seven lean and nine obese). Eleven nondiabetic subjects (six lean and five obese) served as controls. Each subjects underwent treatment with (1) 120 mg PD orally or (2) 2 tablets of placebo orally, 60 minutes before intravenous (IV) injection of 100 micrograms GHRH-(1-29)NH2. We have found no significant differences in GH responses to GHRH between obese diabetics and obese controls. On the other hand, the absolute GH levels were significantly suppressed in lean type II diabetics compared with lean controls at 15 and 30 minutes after GHRH injection. Obese diabetic subjects had slightly but not significantly decreased GH responses to GHRH+PD compared with obese nondiabetic subjects (8.36 +/- 1.62 v 14.4 +/- 7.62 micrograms/L). Lean type II diabetics showed a blunted GH release after GHRH+PD compared with normal-weight healthy subjects (GH peaks, 15.77 +/- 2.17 v 40.88 +/- 6.17 micrograms/L, P < .05). PD enhanced significantly the GH response to GHRH in obese diabetics, obese controls, and non-obese controls (P < .05), but not in non-obese type II diabetics.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Variability in the growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone alone or combined with pyridostigmine in type 1 diabetic patients

In man the GH response to GHRH is variable within and between subjects. Pyridostigmine (PD), an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, has been shown to reduce the variability of the GH response to GHRH in normal subjects. The aim of this study was to assess the existence of either inter- or intraindividual variability in the GH response to GHRH in type 1 diabetic patients. Moreover, we investigated the effect of PD on such variability in the same patients. Seven (4 females-3 males) nonobese type 1 diabetic patients underwent two experiments performed in consecutive days according to a single-blind protocol: 1) 120 mg oral PD 60 min before iv injection of human (h) GHRH-(1-29) NH2, 100 micrograms in 2 ml of sterile water; 2) oral placebo 60 min before iv injection of 100 micrograms hGHRH. The two experiments were then repeated, following the same procedure, one and two weeks after the start of the study. The GH peaks after GHRH were variable within different subjects but also in the same subject on different occasions. However, the mean GH peak levels after GHRH in the three tests were not significantly different (14.2 +/- 3.5, 15.3 +/- 3, 16.5 +/- 6.4 micrograms/L, respectively), the coefficient of variation for each test was 65%, 51.8%, 102.4%, respectively (mean 73.1 +/- 15.1%). The GH response to GHRH was always significantly enhanced by PD administration: the mean GH peak levels in the three tests were 31.9 +/- 7.1, 44.8 +/- 10.4, 49.9 +/- 13.1 micrograms/L, respectively, without significant differences between tests.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Growth hormone response to thyrotropin releasing hormone and placebo in a group of insulin dependent diabetic patients

In order to evaluate if the assessment of the paradoxical GH responses to TRH in diabetic subjects could be altered by the presence of spontaneous fluctuations in plasma GH levels, we compared GH responses to TRH and to saline injection in 19 insulin-dependent diabetic patients. We observed significant increments (greater than 5 ng/ml) in plasma GH levels after TRH iv administration in 5 of 19 patients (26%); on the other hand, a significant increase was also observed in 6 patients (31%) after saline. We conclude that, at least in some diabetics, spontaneous GH pulses might be misinterpreted as paradoxical GH responses after a nonspecific stimulus administration. Moreover, the real existence of the paradoxical GH response to TRH has to be assessed using the following strict criteria: a sufficient magnitude in GH increment (greater than 5 ng/ml), the comparison of the kinetics of GH secretion after TRH and saline in the same patient, the presence of a significant GH rise above basal levels within the first 30 min after TRH injection.

Effect of growth hormone-releasing stimuli in streptozotocin diabetic rats

The dynamics of growth hormone (GH) secretion in response to different GH secretagogues has been studied in adult freely moving male rats one month after induction of diabetes by single i.v. injection of streptozotocin (60 mg/kg). Baseline plasma GH concentrations and pituitary GH content were not different in streptozotocin-diabetic (St-D) rats and controls. Clonidine (0.15 mg/kg i.v.), an alpha 2-adrenergic agonist, failed to evoke GH release in St-D rats. Substitution therapy with insulin (1 IU/100 g b.wt.daily) delivered through subcutaneously implanted minipumps, allowed re-institution of a normal GH responsiveness to clonidine. At odds with clonidine, FK 33-824 (0.1 mg/kg i.v.), a potent analog of the opioid peptide Met-enkephalin, induced a similar rise in plasma GH levels in control and St-D rats. Finally, administration of a synthetic replicate of a GH-releasing hormone of human pancreatic origin, hpGRF-40 (2.5 micrograms/kg i.v.) elicited a higher GH response in St-D rats than in controls. These data indicate that in St-D rats: (1) an impaired function of noradrenergic pathways controlling GH release is present; (2) contrary to previous beliefs, an alpha 2-adrenergic mechanism is not involved in the GH-releasing effect of opioid peptides; and (3) pituitary GH responsiveness to hpGRF is increased.

Glucagon and growth hormone secretion in insulin-treated diabetics: effects of added sulfonylureas

Eleven insulin-dependent ketosis-prone diabetics were given glibenclamide (5 mg/day) in addition to their usual insulin treatment for a period of 1 or 6 mo. There was significant reduction in arginine-induced IRG and hGH secretion and no change in blood glucose levels after either 1 or 6 mo of treatment. During that time no change in weight or insulin requirement was observed. The importance of the duration of treatment and the fact that in this type of patient the effects on IRG and hGH secretion could not be mediated by the influence on insulin secretion are stressed.