Treatment of ulcerative colitis with hydrocrotisone enemas: relationship of hydrocortisone absorption, adrenal suppression, and clinical response

Granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis in the treatment of active distal ulcerative colitis: a prospective, pilot study

AIM

To assess safety and clinical efficacy of granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis for distal ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

Granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis therapy (five aphereses for 5 consecutive weeks) was performed for 30 consecutive patients with active distal ulcerative colitis. Patient compliance, adverse effects and clinical symptoms were regularly assessed.

RESULTS

Adverse effects were noted during nine (6%) apheresis sessions in eight patients; slight headache five, transient abdominal pain with tenesmus two, fever (38 degrees C) one and mild liver dysfunction one. None of these adverse effects was serious and all patients could complete five aphereses. Clinical symptoms (stool frequency and consistency, rectal bleeding, tenesmus and mucus in stools) significantly improved after the third apheresis. Clinical remission (normal stool frequency and no rectal bleeding) was achieved in 21 patients (70%) after five aphereses. The median Disease Activity Index score significantly decreased; from 6 [interquartile range (IQR): 4-7] to 2 (IQR: 1-3) (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In the treatment of active distal ulcerative colitis, granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis is safe and well-tolerated. Granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis had a beneficial effect on clinical remission and symptoms. However, randomized-controlled trials would be necessary to assess a definite efficacy of granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis.

Treatment of inflammatory bowel disease with corticosteroids

Corticosteroids are a mainstay in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Administered topically, orally, or intravenously corticosteroids rapidly and consistently improve moderate to severe active ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, although they are ineffective in the maintenance of remission in either illness. The beneficial effects of corticosteroid therapy are counterbalanced by their many side effects. A better understanding of the mechanism of steroid action and toxicity has led to the development of novel corticosteroids that offer the promise of continued efficacy with minimal toxicity. This article reviews the role of conventional and novel corticosteroids in the management of inflammatory bowel disease.

Comparative tolerability of therapies for ulcerative colitis

This article reviews the clinical pharmacology, adverse events, and comparative tolerability of the drugs commonly available for treating ulcerative colitis. Synthetic glucocorticoids are the most commonly used conventional corticosteroids in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Corticosteroids can be expected to impact on every organ system and most metabolic activities of the body. Suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis is common, but reversible, with conventional corticosteroids, but not with newer topically-acting corticosteroids. A serious complication of corticosteroids in children is growth retardation. The frequent adverse effects associated with the use of corticosteroids have prompted the development of a new group of rectal agents with equivalent efficacy and a more benign adverse event profile such as prednisolone metasulfobenzoate, fluticasone propionate, tixocortol pivalate, beclomethasone dipropionate and budesonide. The incidence of adverse effects related to the use of sulfasalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid plus sulfapyridine) is high and is dose related. The most frequently reported adverse effect is intolerance, not allergy, and relates to the sulfapyridine moiety correlating with the acetylator phenotype. Tolerance to 5-aminosalicylic acid by 80 to 90% of those patients allergic to, or intolerant of, sulfasalazine has given further evidence suggesting that the sulfa moiety is responsible for much of the toxicity of sulfasalazine. However, 10 to 20% of patients who are sulfasalazine intolerant have similar reactions to 5-aminosalicylic acid formulations, indicating that the 5-aminosalicylic acid moiety is responsible for adverse events in some patients taking sulfasalazine. Adverse effects resulting from treatment with azathioprine and mercaptopurine can be divided into two categories: allergic-type reactions that appear to be dose-independent and nonallergic-type reactions that are probably dose- and metabolism-dependent. It is well established now that genotype and thiopurine methyltransferase activity have an important impact on the rate of adverse effects during azathioprine or mercaptopurine therapy. Adverse effects resulting from high dose cyclosporin therapy for inflammatory bowel disease include: renal insufficiency, hypertension, opportunistic infections, seizures, paresthesias, tremor, headache, gingival hyperplasia, hypertrichosis, and anaphylaxis with intravenous cyclosporin. In contrast, the incidence of adverse events was relatively low when low-dose oral cyclosporin was used. The incidence of adverse events associated with any of the medications used in the treatment of ulcerative colitis is difficult to assess and it is therefore hard to make a comparative evaluation. The broadening of the drug regimen available to the clinician has advanced our knowledge about the disease, and further development of more effective, less toxic agents can be anticipated in the future.

Medical management of inflammatory bowel disease in the new millennium

The medical management of inflammatory bowel disease in the new millennium requires integrating cost concerns with the efficacy and safety profiles of the expanded therapeutic options available in order to achieve optimal patient outcome.

Comparative tolerability of treatments for inflammatory bowel disease

Despite limited understanding of therapeutic aetiopathogenesis of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, there is a strong evidence base for the efficacy of pharmacological and biological therapies. It is equally important to recognise toxicity of the medical armamentarium for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Sulfasalazine consists of sulfapyridine linked to 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) via an azo bond. Common adverse effects related to sulfapyridine 'intolerance' include headache, nausea, anorexia, and malaise. Other allergic or toxic adverse effects include fever, rash, haemolytic anaemia, hepatitis, pancreatitis, paradoxical worsening of colitis, and reversible sperm abnormalities. The newer 5-ASA agents were developed to deliver the active ingredient of sulfasalazine while minimising adverse effects. Adverse effects are infrequent but may include nausea, dyspepsia and headache. Olsalazine may cause a secretory diarrhoea. Uncommon hypersensitivity reactions, including worsening of colitis, pancreatitis, pericarditis and nephritis, have also been reported. Corticosteroids are commonly prescribed for treatment of moderate to severe IBD. Despite short term efficacy, corticosteroids have numerous adverse effects that preclude their long term use. Adverse effects include acne, fluid retention, fat redistribution, hypertension, hyperglycaemia, psycho-neurological disturbances, cataracts, adrenal suppression, growth failure in children, and osteonecrosis. Newer corticosteroid preparations offer potential for targeted therapy and less corticosteroid-related adverse effects. Azathioprine and mercaptopurine are associated with pancreatitis in 3 to 15% of patients that resolves upon drug cessation. Bone marrow suppression is dose related and may be delayed. The adverse effects of methotrexate include nausea, leucopenia and, rarely, hypersensitivity pneumonia or hepatic fibrosis. Common adverse effects of cyclosporin include nephrotoxicity, hypertension, headache, gingival hyperplasia, hyperkalaemia, paresthesias, and tremors. These adverse effects usually abate with dose reduction or cessation of therapy. Seizures and opportunistic infections have also been reported. Antibacterials are commonly employed as primary therapy for Crohn's disease. Common adverse effects of metronidazole include nausea and a metallic taste. Peripheral neuropathy can occur with prolonged administration. Ciprofloxacin and other antibacterials may be beneficial in those intolerant to metronidazole. Newer immunosuppressive agents previously reserved for transplant recipients are under investigation for IBD. Tacrolimus has an adverse effect profile similar to cyclosporin, and may cause renal insufficiency. Mycophenolate mofetil, a purine synthesis inhibitor, has primarily gastrointestinal adverse effects. Biological agents targeting specific sites in the immunoinflammatory cascade are now available to treat IBD. Infliximab, a chimeric antibody targeting tumour necrosis factor-or has been well tolerated in clinical trials and early postmarketing experience. Additional trials are needed to assess long term adverse effects.

Review article: issues in oral administration of locally acting glucocorticosteroids for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel diseases are treated in some cases by local administration of anti-inflammatory drugs. Local delivery of drugs in the colon following oral administration may lead to improved efficacy/side-effect profiles and may improve patient compliance. This review covers a number of issues important in the design of oral delivery systems of glucocorticosteroids for local therapy of colonic inflammation. The choice of specific glucocorticosteroids is based on the drug's physicochemical and pharmacological properties. The conditions under which an orally administered glucocorticosteroid (or other drug) must be delivered to treat ulcerative colitis are also discussed. These conditions include variations in local pH, transit throughout the gastrointestinal tract, the potential role of gut microflora, and drug dissolution in both the healthy and diseased large intestine. The effective delivery of topically-active glucocorticosteroids in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's colitis patients is complex, but if successful could improve their usefulness.

Review article: topical corticosteroids in inflammatory bowel disease

It would be ideal to treat inflammatory bowel disease with topical corticosteroids that are either not absorbed through the mucosa, or have a substantial first-pass hepatic metabolism. The topical use of hydrocortisone, prednisolone-21-phosphate or betamethasone is often associated with systemic side-effects. Newer corticosteroid preparations (prednisolone metasulphobenzoate, tixocortol pivalate, fluticasone propionate, beclomethasone dipropionate and budesonide) are usually associated with minimal systemic corticosteroid activity. This article reviews the clinical activity and safety of these newer preparations.

Current management of inflammatory bowel disease

The aetiology of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease remains unknown. While this remains so, treatment must be directed towards pathogenetic mechanisms. Corticosteroids, sulphasalazine and the new salicylates, the immunosuppressants azathioprine, 6-MP and, more recently, cyclosporin and metronidazole have become the accepted and standard forms of treatment. The importance of maintaining nutritional status is often overlooked but must be considered in every patient. Recognition of the occurrence of disease in all age groups, and in particular in children and adolescents, is also important, as is an appreciation of the special problems involved. The possibility of surgery at some stage of the disease should be raised with the patient. As the pathogenetic mechanisms of inflammatory bowel disease are further elucidated, new forms of treatment will be developed. This is already happening, with studies looking at such agents as immunoglobulin G, eicosapentaenoic acid and a new specific inhibitor of 5-lipoxygenase. These offer hope of more potent drugs with low side-effect profiles that may complement or replace the currently available agents used in the management of inflammatory bowel disease.

Spread and distribution of 5-ASA colonic foam and 5-ASA enema in patients with ulcerative colitis

Rectal treatment with enemas, foams, and suppositories is the most efficient method of delivering an adequate quantity of locally active drugs to the distal colon. In a pilot study carried out by colonoscopy in four patients, it was observed that 4 g 5-ASA in 20 ml foam spread up or beyond the splenic flexure and more extensively than 2 g 5-ASA in 10 ml foam. Therefore we have undertaken a study in order to compare by scintigraphy the colonic distribution of 4 g 5-ASA foam versus 4 g 5-ASA in 100 ml liquid enemas in 10 patients with ulcerative colitis using a crossover randomized design. Both preparations were labeled with 100 MBq [99mTc]sulfur colloid before administration. Anterior scans were taken at intervals for 4 hr. Activity, expressed as a percentage of total radioactivity, was measured in the rectum, sigmoid, descending, transverse, and ascending colon. Six patients had the same extent of spread with the two formulations; in three patients with foam and in one patient with enema a greater spread was observed. The foam reached the upper limit of disease in all cases, while enema failed in two cases. The maximum spread with foam was observed within 30 min in nine of 10 patients compared with seven of 10 after enema. Compared to enema, foam distributes more uniformly and seems to persist longer in the descending and sigmoid colon. The 5-ASA colonic foam shows some more favorable characteristics than enema for the local treatment of left-sided ulcerative colitis.

Primary cytomegalovirus infection and gastric ulcers in normal host

A 42-year-old woman presented with epigastric pain and vomiting. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed three gastric ulcers. Histologic examination of biopsies from the ulcers showed cytomegalovirus inclusion bodies. The appearance of IgM antibodies to cytomegalovirus indicated a recent and primary infection. Stored serum from her last pregnancy 17 months previously contained no cytomegalovirus antibodies. A thorough evaluation of her immune system revealed no abnormality. We are aware of only two other cases where seroconversion was documented in normal hosts. Cytomegalovirus infections in the gastrointestinal tract of normal hosts are very unusual but a common cause of morbidity in immunocompromised hosts. We believe that cytomegalovirus may have a role in the pathogenesis of gastrointestinal lesions in nonimmunocompromised patients.

Evolution of the concept of proctosigmoiditis: clinical observation

Proctosigmoiditis, or distal colon ulcerative colitis, has been recognized as a clinical entity for over 50 years and considerable information has emerged from the study of the clinical course of patients with distal colon ulcerative colitis who are followed for a period of years. For most patients the condition is benign, although periods of exacerbation can occur between remissions, characterized by rectal bleeding. However, extension of the disease, development of cancer, and the requirement of surgery are all relatively unusual. It has recently been recognized that there are many other causes of proctitis than the idiopathic form, and this has raised important questions in differential diagnosis, particularly in the proctitis occurring in homosexual males. Proctitis, proctosigmoiditis, and distal colon ulceratice colitis and not Crohn's disease; conversely perianal fistulae and abscesses are rare in distal colon ulcerative colitis. Treatment with various forms of topical agents has often been satisfactory.

Treatment of distal ulcerative colitis (proctosigmoiditis) in relapse: comparison of hydrocortisone enemas and rectal hydrocortisone foam

Thirty patients with distal colitis (proctosigmoiditis) in relapse were randonly allocated to twice daily treatment with traditional aqueous hydrocotrisone enemas (Cortenemas) or a suspension of hydrocortisone in an inert foam base (Colifoam). Each treatment contained the same amount of hydrocortisone. Clinical, sigmoidoscopic, and histological response was assessed after two weeks. Both agents were effective, and broadly similar in terms of objective improvement, but subjective improvement was greater with the foam preparation, and several patients expressed a preference to this mode of treatment.

Inflammatory disease of the colon: ulcerative colitis and Crohn's colitis

Ulcerative colitis differs from Crohn's colitis in several ways. In ulcerative colitis the disease is limited to the mucosa and, occasionally, the submucosa; Crohn's colitis may involve all layers of the large intestine. Ulcerative colitis almost always begins in the rectum, is diffuse, and spreads proximally. Crohn's colitis may spare the rectum and has a patchy distribution. Perianal fistulas and ulcers are rare in ulcerative colitis but are common in Crohn's colitis. Granulomas and giant cells are not found in ulcerative colitis but are seen in the majority of patients with Crohn's colitis. Colonic and extraintestinal symptoms in the two illnesses may be indistinguishable but growth failure is far more severe in Crohn's colitis and may precede intestinal symptoms by months to years. Cancer of the colon is a risk in patients with either ulcerative or Crohn's colitis but is far more common in the former. It is important to distinguish between ulcerative colitis and Crohn's colitis because response to treatment and prognosis are different. Although neither condition can be cured by medical management, patients with ulcerative colitis may respond more frequently. Unfortunately, in the pediatric age range most cases of ulcerative and Crohn's colitis may be classified as moderate to severe. Fortunately for patients with ulcerative colitis, total colectomy with ileostomy will result in cure of illness. Patients with Crohn's colitis who require surgery may obtain remission of symptoms, but the disease is likely to recur in the small intestine.