1
|
Get a Grip: Variation in Human Hand Grip Strength and Implications for Human Evolution. Symmetry (Basel) 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/sym13071142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Although hand grip strength is critical to the daily lives of humans and our arboreal great ape relatives, the human hand has changed in form and function throughout our evolution due to terrestrial bipedalism, tool use, and directional asymmetry (DA) such as handedness. Here we investigate how hand form and function interact in modern humans to gain an insight into our evolutionary past. We measured grip strength in a heterogeneous, cross-sectional sample of human participants (n = 662, 17 to 83 years old) to test the potential effects of age, sex, asymmetry (hand dominance and handedness), hand shape, occupation, and practice of sports and musical instruments that involve the hand(s). We found a significant effect of sex and hand dominance on grip strength, but not of handedness, while hand shape and age had a greater influence on female grip strength. Females were significantly weaker with age, but grip strength in females with large hands was less affected than those with long hands. Frequent engagement in hand sports significantly increased grip strength in the non-dominant hand in both sexes, while only males showed a significant effect of occupation, indicating different patterns of hand dominance asymmetries and hand function. These results improve our understanding of the link between form and function in both hands and offer an insight into the evolution of human laterality and dexterity.
Collapse
|
2
|
Kroliczak G, Buchwald M, Kleka P, Klichowski M, Potok W, Nowik AM, Randerath J, Piper BJ. Manual praxis and language-production networks, and their links to handedness. Cortex 2021; 140:110-127. [PMID: 33975084 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Revised: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
While Liepmann was one of the first researchers to consider a relationship between skilled manual actions (praxis) and language for tasks performed "freely from memory", his primary focus was on the relations between the organization of praxis and left-hemisphere dominance. Subsequent attempts to apply his apraxia model to all cases he studied - including his first patient, a "non-pure right-hander" treated as an exception - left the praxis-handedness issue unresolved. Modern neuropsychological and recent neuroimaging evidence either showed closer associations of praxis and language, than between handedness and any of these two functions, or focused on their dissociations. Yet, present-day developments in neuroimaging and statistics allow us to overcome the limitations of the earlier work on praxis-language-handedness links, and to better quantify their interrelationships. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we studied tool use pantomimes and subvocal word generation in 125 participants, including righthanders (NRH = 52), ambidextrous individuals (mixedhanders; NMH = 31), and lefthanders (NLH = 42). Laterality indices were calculated both in two critical cytoarchitectonic maps, and 180 multi-modal parcellations of the human cerebral cortex, using voxel count and signal intensity, and the most relevant regions of interest and their networks were further analyzed. We found that atypical organization of praxis was present in all handedness groups (RH = 25.0%, MH = 22.6%; LH = 45.2%), and was about two and a half times as common as atypical organization of language (RH = 3.8%; MH = 6.5%; LH = 26.2%), contingent on ROI selection/LI-calculation method. Despite strong associations of praxis and language, regardless of handedness and typicality, dissociations of atypically represented praxis from typical left-lateralized language were common (~20% of cases), whereas the inverse dissociations of atypically represented language from typical left-lateralized praxis were very rare (in ~2.5% of all cases). The consequences of the existence of such different phenotypes for theoretical accounts of manual praxis, and its links to language and handedness are modeled and discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory Kroliczak
- Action and Cognition Laboratory, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland; Faculty of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.
| | - Mikolaj Buchwald
- Action and Cognition Laboratory, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland
| | - Pawel Kleka
- Faculty of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland
| | - Michal Klichowski
- Action and Cognition Laboratory, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland; Faculty of Educational Studies, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland
| | - Weronika Potok
- Neural Control of Movement Laboratory, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Agnieszka M Nowik
- Action and Cognition Laboratory, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland; Faculty of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland
| | - Jennifer Randerath
- University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany; Lurija Institute for Rehabilitation Sciences and Health Research at the University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
| | - Brian J Piper
- Department of Medical Education, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Uomini NT, Ruck L. Manual laterality and cognition through evolution: An archeological perspective. PROGRESS IN BRAIN RESEARCH 2018; 238:295-323. [DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
4
|
|
5
|
Meyer GF, Spray A, Fairlie JE, Uomini NT. Inferring common cognitive mechanisms from brain blood-flow lateralization data: a new methodology for fTCD analysis. Front Psychol 2014; 5:552. [PMID: 24982641 PMCID: PMC4059176 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2014] [Accepted: 05/19/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Current neuroimaging techniques with high spatial resolution constrain participant motion so that many natural tasks cannot be carried out. The aim of this paper is to show how a time-locked correlation-analysis of cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) lateralization data, obtained with functional TransCranial Doppler (fTCD) ultrasound, can be used to infer cerebral activation patterns across tasks. In a first experiment we demonstrate that the proposed analysis method results in data that are comparable with the standard Lateralization Index (LI) for within-task comparisons of CBFV patterns, recorded during cued word generation (CWG) at two difficulty levels. In the main experiment we demonstrate that the proposed analysis method shows correlated blood-flow patterns for two different cognitive tasks that are known to draw on common brain areas, CWG, and Music Synthesis. We show that CBFV patterns for Music and CWG are correlated only for participants with prior musical training. CBFV patterns for tasks that draw on distinct brain areas, the Tower of London and CWG, are not correlated. The proposed methodology extends conventional fTCD analysis by including temporal information in the analysis of cerebral blood-flow patterns to provide a robust, non-invasive method to infer whether common brain areas are used in different cognitive tasks. It complements conventional high resolution imaging techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg F Meyer
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool Liverpool, UK
| | - Amy Spray
- School of Psychology, University of Liverpool Liverpool, UK
| | - Jo E Fairlie
- Department of Archaeology, Classics and Egyptology, University of Liverpool Liverpool, UK
| | - Natalie T Uomini
- Department of Archaeology, Classics and Egyptology, University of Liverpool Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
The Flinders Handedness survey (FLANDERS): A brief measure of skilled hand preference. Cortex 2013; 49:2914-26. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 189] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2012] [Revised: 12/13/2012] [Accepted: 02/01/2013] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
7
|
Uomini NT, Meyer GF. Shared brain lateralization patterns in language and Acheulean stone tool production: a functional transcranial Doppler ultrasound study. PLoS One 2013; 8:e72693. [PMID: 24023634 PMCID: PMC3758346 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2013] [Accepted: 07/12/2013] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The popular theory that complex tool-making and language co-evolved in the human lineage rests on the hypothesis that both skills share underlying brain processes and systems. However, language and stone tool-making have so far only been studied separately using a range of neuroimaging techniques and diverse paradigms. Methodology/Principal Findings We present the first-ever study of brain activation that directly compares active Acheulean tool-making and language. Using functional transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (fTCD), we measured brain blood flow lateralization patterns (hemodynamics) in subjects who performed two tasks designed to isolate the planning component of Acheulean stone tool-making and cued word generation as a language task. We show highly correlated hemodynamics in the initial 10 seconds of task execution. Conclusions/Significance Stone tool-making and cued word generation cause common cerebral blood flow lateralization signatures in our participants. This is consistent with a shared neural substrate for prehistoric stone tool-making and language, and is compatible with language evolution theories that posit a co-evolution of language and manual praxis. In turn, our results support the hypothesis that aspects of language might have emerged as early as 1.75 million years ago, with the start of Acheulean technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Thaïs Uomini
- Department of Archaeology, Classics and Egyptology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Georg Friedrich Meyer
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Phillips KA, Thompson CR. Hand preference for tool-use in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) is associated with asymmetry of the primary motor cortex. Am J Primatol 2013; 75:435-40. [PMID: 22987442 PMCID: PMC3527644 DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2012] [Revised: 08/07/2012] [Accepted: 08/20/2012] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Skilled motor actions are associated with handedness and neuroanatomical specializations in humans. Recent reports have documented similar neuroanatomical asymmetries and their relationship to hand preference in some nonhuman primate species, including chimpanzees and capuchin monkeys. We investigated whether capuchins displayed significant hand preferences for a tool-use task and whether such preferences were associated with motor-processing regions of the brain. Handedness data on a dipping tool-use task and high-resolution 3T MRI scans were collected from 15 monkeys. Capuchins displayed a significant group-level left-hand preference for this type of tool use, and handedness was associated with asymmetry of the primary motor cortex. Left-hand preferent individuals displayed a deeper central sulcus in the right hemisphere. Our results suggest that capuchins show an underlying right-hemisphere bias for skilled movement.
Collapse
|
9
|
Human handedness: An inherited evolutionary trait. Behav Brain Res 2013; 237:200-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.09.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2012] [Revised: 09/17/2012] [Accepted: 09/20/2012] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
10
|
Abstract
AbstractThis article has two goals. The first is to assess, in the face of accruing reports on the ingenuity of great ape tool use, whether and in what sense human tool use still evidences unique, higher cognitive ability. To that effect, I offer a systematic comparison between humans and nonhuman primates with respect to nine cognitive capacities deemed crucial to tool use: enhanced hand-eye coordination, body schema plasticity, causal reasoning, function representation, executive control, social learning, teaching, social intelligence, and language. Since striking differences between humans and great apes stand firm in eight out of nine of these domains, I conclude that human tool use still marks a major cognitive discontinuity between us and our closest relatives. As a second goal of the paper, I address the evolution of human technologies. In particular, I show how the cognitive traits reviewed help to explain why technological accumulation evolved so markedly in humans, and so modestly in apes.
Collapse
|
11
|
Roby-Brami A, Hermsdörfer J, Roy AC, Jacobs S. A neuropsychological perspective on the link between language and praxis in modern humans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2012; 367:144-60. [PMID: 22106433 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Hypotheses about the emergence of human cognitive abilities postulate strong evolutionary links between language and praxis, including the possibility that language was originally gestural. The present review considers functional and neuroanatomical links between language and praxis in brain-damaged patients with aphasia and/or apraxia. The neural systems supporting these functions are predominantly located in the left hemisphere. There are many parallels between action and language for recognition, imitation and gestural communication suggesting that they rely partially on large, common networks, differentially recruited depending on the nature of the task. However, this relationship is not unequivocal and the production and understanding of gestural communication are dependent on the context in apraxic patients and remains to be clarified in aphasic patients. The phonological, semantic and syntactic levels of language seem to share some common cognitive resources with the praxic system. In conclusion, neuropsychological observations do not allow support or rejection of the hypothesis that gestural communication may have constituted an evolutionary link between tool use and language. Rather they suggest that the complexity of human behaviour is based on large interconnected networks and on the evolution of specific properties within strategic areas of the left cerebral hemisphere.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnes Roby-Brami
- Laboratory of Neurophysics and Physiology, University Paris Descartes, CNRS UMR 8119, 45 rue des Saints Pères, 75006 Paris, France.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Atypical lateralization of language predicts cerebral asymmetries in parietal gesture representations. Neuropsychologia 2011; 49:1698-702. [PMID: 21382390 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2010] [Revised: 02/17/2011] [Accepted: 02/22/2011] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Humans typically show left-hemisphere dominance both for language and manual gestures. If this reflects a dependence of these behaviors on a common cerebral specialization, then healthy left-handers with atypical organization of language should show a similar pattern for gesture. Consistent with this hypothesis, we report fMRI data indicating that sinistrals (5/15) with bilateral, or right-lateralized, language representations in inferior frontal cortex exhibit a similar atypical pattern in inferior parietal representations of familiar gestures.
Collapse
|
13
|
Braccini S, Lambeth S, Schapiro S, Fitch WT. Bipedal tool use strengthens chimpanzee hand preferences. J Hum Evol 2010; 58:234-41. [PMID: 20089294 PMCID: PMC4675323 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2009] [Revised: 10/23/2009] [Accepted: 11/09/2009] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The degree to which non-human primate behavior is lateralized, at either individual or population levels, remains controversial. We investigated the relationship between hand preference and posture during tool use in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) during bipedal tool use. We experimentally induced tool use in a supported bipedal posture, an unsupported bipedal posture, and a seated posture. Neither bipedal tool use nor these supported conditions have been previously evaluated in apes. The hypotheses tested were 1) bipedal posture will increase the strength of hand preference, and 2) a bipedal stance, without the use of one hand for support, will elicit a right hand preference. Results supported the first, but not the second hypothesis: bipedalism induced the subjects to become more lateralized, but not in any particular direction. Instead, it appears that subtle pre-existing lateral biases, to either the right or left, were emphasized with increasing postural demands. This result has interesting implications for theories of the evolution of tool use and bipedalism, as the combination of bipedalism and tool use may have helped drive extreme lateralization in modern humans, but cannot alone account for the preponderance of right-handedness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Braccini
- Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution and Scottish Primate Research Group, School of Psychology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9JP, United Kingdom
| | - Susan Lambeth
- Department of Veterinary Sciences, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, Texas 78602 USA
| | - Steve Schapiro
- Department of Veterinary Sciences, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, Texas 78602 USA
| | - W. Tecumseh Fitch
- Department of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, 14 Althanstrasse, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
|
15
|
Króliczak G, Frey SH. A common network in the left cerebral hemisphere represents planning of tool use pantomimes and familiar intransitive gestures at the hand-independent level. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2009; 19:2396-410. [PMID: 19181695 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhn261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 156] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Evidence from neuropsychology and neuroimaging implicates parietal and frontal areas of the left cerebral hemisphere in the representation of skills involving the use of tools and other artifacts. On the basis of neuropsychological data, it has been claimed that 1) independent mechanisms within the left hemisphere may support the representation of these skills (transitive actions) versus meaningful gestures that do not involve manipulating objects (intransitive actions), and 2) both cerebral hemispheres may participate in the representation of intransitive gestures. Functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to test these hypotheses in 12 healthy adults while they planned and executed tool use pantomimes or intransitive gestures with their dominant right (Exp. 1) or nondominant left (Exp. 2) hands. Even when linguistic processing demands were controlled, planning either type of action was associated with asymmetrical increases in the same regions of left parietal (the intraparietal sulcus, supramarginal gyrus, and caudal superior parietal lobule) and dorsal premotor cortices. Effects were greater for tool use pantomimes, but only when the right hand was involved. Neither group nor individual analyses revealed evidence for greater bilateral activity during intransitive gesture planning. In summary, at the hand-independent level, transitive and intransitive actions are represented in a common, left-lateralized praxis network.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory Króliczak
- Psychology Department, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-5288, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Frey SH. Tool use, communicative gesture and cerebral asymmetries in the modern human brain. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2008; 363:1951-7. [PMID: 18292060 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 120] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Determining the brain adaptations that underlie complex tool-use skills is an important component in understanding the physiological bases of human material culture. It is argued here that the ways in which humans skilfully use tools and other manipulable artefacts is possible owing to adaptations that integrate sensory-motor and cognitive processes. Data from brain-injured patients and functional neuroimaging studies suggest that the left cerebral hemisphere, particularly the left parietal cortex, of modern humans is specialized for this purpose. This brain area integrates dynamically representations that are computed in a distributed network of regions, several of which are also left-lateralized. Depending on the nature of the task, these may include conceptual knowledge about objects and their functions, the actor's goals and intentions, and interpretations of task demands. The result is the formation of a praxis representation that is appropriate for the prevailing task context. Recent evidence is presented that this network is organized similarly in the right- and left-handed individuals, and participates in the representation of both familiar tool-use skills and communicative gestures. This shared brain mechanism may reflect common origins of the human specializations for complex tool use and language.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott H Frey
- Lewis Center for Neuroimaging, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-5288, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Falk D. Brain lateralization in primates and its evolution in hominids. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 1987. [DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330300508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 115] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
18
|
Self-Generated Experience and the Development of Lateralized Neurobehavioral Organization in Infants. ADVANCES IN THE STUDY OF BEHAVIOR 1987. [DOI: 10.1016/s0065-3454(08)60176-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register]
|