Differences in expression of GABAA receptor subunits, but not benzodiazepine binding, in the chick brainstem auditory system

The analysis of interaural time differences in the chick brain stem

The brain stem auditory system of the chick has proven to be a useful model system for analyzing how the brain encodes temporal information. This paper reviews some of the work on a circuit in the brain stem that compares the timing of information coming from the two ears to determine the location of a sound source. The contralateral projection from the cochlear nucleus, nucleus magnocellularis (NM), to nucleus laminaris (NL) forms a delay line as it proceeds from medial to lateral across NL. NL neurons function like coincidence detectors in that they respond maximally when input from the two ears arrive simultaneously. This arrangement may allow NL to code sound space by the relative level of activity across the nucleus. The head anatomy of the chick allows for enhancement of the functional interaural time differences. Comparing the functional interaural time differences to the length of the neural delay line suggests that each NL can encode approximately one hemifield of sound space. Finally it is suggested that inhibitory input into the NM-NL circuit may provide a means to dynamically adjust the gain of the circuit to allow accurate coding of sound location despite changes in overall sound intensity.

Effect of GABA on the processing of interaural time differences in nucleus laminaris neurons in the chick

Neurons in the avian nucleus laminaris (NL) are the first to receive binaural information and are presumed to play a role in encoding interaural time differences (ITD). NL not only receives excitatory projections from the ipsi- and contralateral nucleus magnocellularis, but also receives inhibitory (GABAergic) input. This study investigates how GABA (gamma-aminobutyric acid) influences ITD coding in NL. Intracellular responses of chick NL neurons were studied in a brain slice preparation. Both excitatory inputs to NL were electrically activated and the delay between trains of bilateral stimuli (simulated-interaural time difference [s-ITD]) was varied. The resulting s-ITD functions were recorded in the presence of 0-75 microM GABA. The discharge rate of NL neurons varied with s-ITD. Cells responded maximally using s-ITDs at which the peak of the ipsi- and contralateral excitatory postsynaptic potentials occurred simultaneously (favourable s-ITD). At unfavourable s-ITDs, the discharge rates usually fell below unilateral levels. GABA had contrary effects on the s-ITD functions depending on the drug concentration. A low GABA dose enhanced excitability at favourable s-ITD, but not at unfavourable s-ITDs. In contrast, higher GABA concentrations diminished excitability. Moderate GABA concentrations had no consistent effect. These results suggest that the GABAergic input to NL will either increase or decrease the excitability of the NL neuron depending on the degree to which this GABAergic input is activated. A gain control hypothesis is presented in which the GABAergic input makes ITD processing in NL independent of the stimulus intensity by adjusting the excitability of NL neurons.