Allergy to protamine

What's fishy about protamine? Clinical use, adverse reactions, and potential alternatives

Protamine, a highly basic protein isolated from salmon sperm, is the only clinically available agent to reverse the anticoagulation of unfractionated heparin. Following intravenous administration, protamine binds to heparin in a nonspecific electrostatic interaction to reverse its anticoagulant effects. In clinical use, protamine is routinely administered to reverse high-dose heparin anticoagulation in cardiovascular procedures, including cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Despite the lack of supportive evidence regarding protamine's effectiveness to reverse low-molecular-weight heparin, it is recommended in guidelines with low-quality evidence. Different dosing strategies have been reported for reversing heparin in cardiac surgical patients based on empiric dosing, pharmacokinetics, or point-of-care measurements of heparin levels. Protamine administration is associated with a spectrum of adverse reactions that range from vasodilation to life-threatening cardiopulmonary dysfunction and shock. The life-threatening responses appear to be hypersensitivity reactions due to immunoglobulin E and/or immunoglobulin G antibodies. However, protamine and heparin-protamine complexes can activate complement inflammatory pathways and inhibit other coagulation factors. Although alternative agents for reversing heparin are not currently available for clinical use, additional research continues evaluating novel therapeutic approaches.

Review of Target-Specific Anticoagulation Reversal Agents

Bleeding related to direct oral anticoagulants accounts for nearly half of emergency department visits annually and until recently there were no reversal antidotes available. As there continues to be a shift in prescribing practices away from warfarin, it is essential to have these reversal agents readily available for the treatment of life-threatening bleeds associated with these anticoagulants. In addition, for agents that continue to lack a targeted reversal agent (eg, low-molecular-weight heparin, antiplatelets, and new antithrombotics), it is imperative that research continues to evaluate improved reversal strategies. This review focuses on target-specific anticoagulation reversal agents currently available in the United States (protamine, idarucizumab, and andexanet alfa) and summarizes agents that are in the pipeline for these anticoagulants and antiplatelets.

Protamine (heparin)-induced thrombocytopenia: a review of the serological and clinical features associated with anti-protamine/heparin antibodies

Protamine is widely used in medicine as a rapidly-acting antidote to heparin, particularly for reversing heparin anticoagulation after cardiac surgery. Protamine is also used as a stabilizing additive to certain preparations of insulin. Recent reports demonstrate that protamine and heparin form multimolecular complexes that result in high rates of immunization in post-cardiac surgery patients, particularly of immunoglobulin G (IgG) class antibodies; a subset of these anti-protamine/heparin IgG antibodies activates platelets through their FcγIIA (IgG) receptors. Although the clinical consequences of anti-protamine/heparin antibodies that are newly generated after cardiac surgery are unknown, there is evidence that platelet-activating anti-protamine/heparin antibodies already present at the time of cardiac surgery might occasionally explain more severe thrombocytopenia with delayed platelet count recovery, as well as thromboembolic complications, in the post-cardiac surgery setting. Triggers for such antibodies remain poorly-defined, but could include preoperative administration of heparin to diabetic patients receiving protamine-insulin as well as recent previous cardiac surgery. Anti-protamine/heparin antibodies have several features in common with anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) PF4/heparin antibodies implicated in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), including immunization by heparin-containing multimolecular complexes, predominant IgG class, pathological platelet-activating properties, relatively rapid IgG formation without IgM precedence, and antibody transience. Despite these similarities, the risk of anti-protamine/heparin antibody-mediated complications seems to affect the early post-cardiac surgery period, whereas HIT usually occurs at least 5 days following cardiac surgery. Clinicians need to become aware of this recently recognized immunohematological disorder, and research is needed to identify triggers of immunization, improve detection of pathological antibodies and identify patients at risk of this complication.

Platelet-activating protamine-heparin-antibodies lead to higher protamine demand in patients undergoing cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVES

Platelet-activating antibodies against protamine-heparin-complexes were described in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, but their clinical consequences remain unclear. This prospective single-center observational study aimed to describe the prevalence and clinical consequences of protamine-heparin-complex antibodies in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

METHODS

A total of 200 patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass were included. Blood samples were collected preoperatively and 1 hour, 24 hours, and 7 days after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass. All sera were tested for the presence of protamine-heparin-complex antibodies using a modified heparin-induced platelet-activation assay. Specific Fcγ receptor IIa-dependent platelet activation was confirmed by repeated testing in the presence of the Fcγ receptor IIa-blocking antibody IV.3.

RESULTS

Samples from 185 patients were obtained, of whom 24 patients (13%) were positive for protamine-heparin-complex antibodies preoperatively. In all positive samples, functional reactivity was reversible in the presence of IV.3. Although patients with a preoperative presence of protamine-heparin-complex antibodies were significantly older compared with patients negative for protamine-heparin-complex antibodies (73 ± 9.8 years vs 68 ± 10 years, P = .037), no other potential risk factors were identified at 1 day before operation. Patients with protamine-heparin-complex antibodies required significantly more protamine to neutralize heparin (47.66 mg vs 41.67 mg, P = .027). Protamine-heparin-complex antibodies have no significant influence on perioperative platelet numbers, bleeding complications, transfusion requirement, thromboembolic events, major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, inflammation parameters, or kidney function.

CONCLUSIONS

Protamine-heparin-complex antibodies occur frequently in patients undergoing cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass, resulting in specific platelet activation in vitro. Protamine-heparin-complex antibodies are associated with increased protamine requirement after cardiopulmonary bypass and possibly slower recovery of platelet numbers.

High incidence of antibodies to protamine and protamine/heparin complexes in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass

Protamine is routinely used to reverse heparin anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Heparin interacts with protamine to form ultralarge complexes that are immunogenic in mice. We hypothesized that patients exposed to protamine and heparin during CPB will develop antibodies (Abs) to protamine/heparin (PRT/H) complexes that are capable of platelet activation. Specimens from a recently completed prospective clinical trial (HIT [for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia] 5801 study; n = 500) of CPB patients were examined for PRT/H Abs at baseline, at time of hospital discharge (between days 3 through 7), and 30 days after CPB. PRT/H antibody features were characterized and correlated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. We found a high incidence of PRT/H antibody formation (29%) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. PRT/H Abs were of high titer (mean titer 1:14,744), showed heparin-dependent binding, and activated platelets in the presence of protamine. PRT/H Abs showed no cross-reactivity to platelet factor 4/heparin complexes, but were cross-reactive with protamine-containing insulin preparations. In the absence of circulating antigen at day 30, there were no complications of thrombocytopenia, thrombotic events, or long-term cardiovascular events. These studies show that Abs to PRT/H occur commonly after cardiac bypass surgery, share a number of serologic features with HIT Abs, including platelet activation, and may pose health risks to patients requiring drug reexposure.

Peri-operative anaphylaxis

Peri-operative anaphylaxis is an important cause for mortality and morbidity associated with anaesthesia. The true incidence is unknown and is most likely under reported. Diagnosis can be difficult, particularly as a number of drugs are given simultaneously and any of these agents can potentially cause anaphylaxis. This review covers the clinical features, differential diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis associated with anaesthesia. The investigations to confirm the clinical suspicion of anaphylaxis and further tests to identify the likely drug(s) are examined. Finally the salient features of common and rare causes including non-drug substances are described.

Prevention of anaphylactic reactions to anaesthetic drugs

Although screening tests to prevent anaphylaxis during anaesthesia have been advocated, such tests are unlikely to have significant impact on reducing the incidence of anaphylaxis during anaesthesia. This is due to the low prevalence of the disease, the diversity of drugs used in anaesthesia and the incidence of false positive and negative tests. The suggested risk factors of allergy, i.e. atopy, asthma, family history, female sex, previous exposure, vasectomy, use of zinc protamine sulfate insulin and allergy to cosmetics, eggs, fish and non-anaesthetic drugs are not valid. Although all have theoretical or real associations with anaphylaxis during anaesthesia the majority of patients with such a history undergo uneventful anaesthesia. Fruit allergy, anaphylaxis to cephalosporins and penicillin, barbiturate allergy, gelatin allergy and allergy to metabisulphite and eggs require consideration in avoiding particular drugs. The incidence of anaesthetic anaphylaxis can be reduced by avoiding latex exposure in patients with spina bifida or latex allergy, and preventing second reactions in patients with a history of anaphylaxis, or major undiagnosed or undocumented adverse events during anaesthesia. Determining the cause of an adverse event and the drug responsible, and adequately communicating those findings can reduce second reactions. Avoiding neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs) in patients who have reacted to an NMBD, and use of non-intravenous techniques should also reduce the incidence of second reactions. Desensitisation, and blocking with monovalent quaternary ammonium compounds may allow improved safety of NMBDs and pretreatment with antihistamines and corticosteroids may block or ameliorate the severity of reactions, but there is currently little evidence to support their routine use.

Heparinless cardiopulmonary bypass with active-site blocked factor IXa: a preliminary study on the dog

OBJECTIVE

Cardiopulmonary bypass is a potent stimulus for activation of procoagulant pathways. Heparin, the traditional antithrombotic agent, however, is often associated with increased perioperative blood loss because of its multiple sites of action in the coagulation cascade and its antiplatelet and profibrinolytic effects. Furthermore, heparin-mediated immunologic reactions (that is, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia) may contraindicate its use. Cardiopulmonary bypass with a selective factor IXa inhibitor was tested to see whether it could effectively limit bypass circuit/intravascular space thrombosis while decreasing extravascular bleeding, thereby providing an alternative anticoagulant strategy when heparin may not be safely administered.

METHODS

Active site-blocked factor IXa, a competitive inhibitor of the assembly of factor IXa into the factor X activation complex, was prepared by modification of the enzyme's active site by the use of dansyl glutamic acid-glycine-arginine-chlormethylketone. Twenty mongrel dogs (five were given standard heparin/protamine; 15 were given activated site-blocked factor IXa doses ranging from 300 to 600 microg/kg) underwent 1 hour of hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass, and blood loss was monitored for 3 hours after the procedure.

RESULTS

Use of activated site-blocked factor IXa as an anticoagulant in cardiopulmonary bypass limited fibrin deposition within the extracorporeal circuit as assessed by scanning electron microscopy, comparable with the antithrombotic effect seen with heparin. In contrast to heparin, effective antithrombotic doses of activated site-blocked factor IXa significantly diminished blood loss in the thoracic cavity and in an abdominal incisional bleeding model.

CONCLUSION

These initial studies on the dog suggest that administration of activated site-blocked factor IXa may be an effective alternative anticoagulant strategy in cardiopulmonary bypass when heparin is contraindicated, affording inhibition of intravascular/extracorporeal circuit thrombosis with enhanced hemostasis in the surgical wound.