Postmarketing surveillance study of nateglinide in Japan

A review of methods used in assessing non-serious adverse drug events in observational studies among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients

Clinical drug trials are often conducted in selective patient populations, with relatively small numbers of patients, and a short duration of follow-up. Observational studies are therefore important for collecting additional information on adverse drug events (ADEs). Currently, there is no guidance regarding the methodology for measuring ADEs in such studies. Our aim was to evaluate whether the methodology used to assess non-serious ADEs in observational studies is adequate for detecting these ADEs, and for addressing limitations from clinical trials in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. We systematically searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for observational studies reporting non-serious ADEs (1999-2008). Methods to assess ADEs were classified as: 1) medical record review; 2) surveillance by health care professionals (HCP); 3) patient survey; 4) administrative data; 5) laboratory/clinical values; 6) not specified. We compared the range of ADEs identified, number and selection of patients included, and duration of follow-up. Out of 10,125 publications, 68 studies met our inclusion criteria. The most common methods were based on laboratory/clinical values (n = 25) and medical record review (n = 18). Solicited surveillance by HCP (n = 17) revealed the largest diversity of ADEs. Patient surveys (n = 15) focused mostly on hypoglycaemia and gastrointestinal ADEs, laboratory values based studies on hepatic and metabolic ADEs, and administrative database studies (n = 5) on cardiovascular ADEs. Four studies presented ADEs that were identified with the use of more than one method. The patient population was restricted to a lower risk population in 19% of the studies. Less than one third of the studies exceeded pre-approval regulatory requirements for sample size and duration of follow-up. We conclude that the current assessment of ADEs is hampered by the choice of methods. Many observational studies rely on methods that are inadequate for identifying all possible ADEs. Patient-reported outcomes and combinations of methods are underutilized. Furthermore, while observational studies often include unselective patient populations, many do not adequately address other limitations of pre-approval trials. This implies that these studies will not provide sufficient information about ADEs to clinicians and patients. Better protocols are needed on how to assess adverse drug events not only in clinical trials but also in observational studies.

Impact of therapeutic advances on hypoglycaemia in type 2 diabetes

Patients with type 2 diabetes experience hypoglycaemia less frequently than those with type 1 diabetes. Some protection against hypoglycaemia is afforded by the relatively intact glucose counter-regulatory pathways that characterize the pathophysiology of early type 2 diabetes. To some extent, this protection explains why hypoglycaemic episodes in intensively treated individuals with type 2 diabetes, when they occur, are rarely severe. As diabetes progresses and therapy intensifies to achieve recommended glycaemic goals, hypoglycaemia frequency and severity increase. Thus, when it comes to instituting intensive therapy, fear of hypoglycaemia may contribute to health-care providers' 'clinical inertia'. Because maintaining glycaemic control is so important to both public and individual health, many new therapies and technologies have been developed. This manuscript reviews and considers whether these advancements in therapy make glycaemic goals easier to achieve by minimizing hypoglycaemia. Putting the hypoglycaemia experienced by type 2 diabetes patients into appropriate clinical perspective, the impact of recent progress made in pharmacotherapy, drug delivery systems, and BG monitoring on hypoglycaemia incidence is largely positive. The extent to which this progress can effect improvement over traditional therapies will, however, depend upon patient (and provider) education, motivation and behaviour change.

Study of nateglinide in Japan: long-term treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes

Nateglinide is an oral antidiabetic medication that acts through rapid, short-term stimulation of insulin production. This study undertook to identify the nature of any adverse effects of nateglinide and to assess its clinical efficacy in long-term use in clinical practice. Patients (n=1014) were recruited from centers in Japan and were followed over a 15-month treatment period. Pretreatment and posttreatment values were obtained for fasting blood glucose, postprandial blood glucose, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), triglycerides, and total cholesterol. All adverse reactions were noted, along with standard laboratory blood variables. The efficacy value was rated as 78.76% by the treating physicians; this was indicated by a postprandial glucose decrease of 53.2 mg/dL (from 223.8+/-61.1 mg/dL to 170.6+/-40.7 mg/dL), a fasting glucose decrease of 9.3 mg/dL (from 155.1+/- 40.0 mg/dL to 145.4+/-35.1 mg/dL), and an HbA1c decrease of 0.68% (from 7.51+/- 1.36% to 6.83+/-1.09%). In patients previously treated with sulfonylurea, a decrease in HbA1c was not observed. Changes in HbA1c had no association with age, body mass index (BMI), duration of diabetes, or concomitant disease. No change in BMI was noted after 15 months of nateglinide treatment. Adverse reactions occurred at an incidence of 10.07% (100/993 cases), with hypoglycemic symptoms being the most prevalent (1.91%). Adverse reactions were sometimes associated with extant renal dysfunction, a condition about which the physician had to be aware. No problems such as increased incidences of adverse reactions or deterioration in severity were detected in this long-term study. This study showed the efficacy and safety of long-term treatment with nateglinide of patients with diabetes from various backgrounds.

Postmarketing study of nateglinide in Japan: treatment of medication-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes

Nateglinide is an oral antidiabetic medication (OAD) that acts through rapid, short-term stimulation of insulin production. This study was conducted to identify the nature of any adverse effects associated with nateglinide and to evaluate its clinical efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes, with particular attention to hypoglycemia. Patients with type 2 diabetes who were OAD naïve (n=547), whose fasting blood glucose levels were 150 mg/dL or lower, and who had start-ed to take nateglinide alone were recruited from 139 centers in Japan with a 12-week observation period. The incidence of adverse reactions was 7.62%. Hypoglycemia accompanied by hypoglycemic symptoms was the most prevalent adverse event (2.10%; 11/525). Nine of 11 episodes required no therapeutic intervention. Severe hypoglycemia was recognized in only 1 case of diabetes complicated by serious renal dysfunction, for which nateglinide has been contraindicated in Japan. No subject experienced symptoms of nocturnal or prolonged hypoglycemia. After 12 weeks of nateglinide treatment, decreases were noted in hemoglobin A1c (0.82%), postprandial glucose (reduced by 59.4 mg/dL to 158.0 mg/dL), and fasting glucose (reduced by 11.7 mg/dL to 122.4 mg/dL). Nateglinide, which demonstrates limited risk of hypoglycemia and effectively controls blood glucose level, is regarded as a useful drug for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes.