Tolerability, quality of life, and persistency of use in patients with glaucoma who are switched to the fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol

Lessons learned from the development and implementation of a patient-reported outcome and experience measure (POEM) in an Australian glaucoma practice

Background

A patient’s perception of how their glaucoma is managed will influence both adherence to their medication and outcome measures such as quality of life.

Methods

Prospective consecutive study using a Glaucoma Patient-reported Outcome and Experience Measure (POEM) modified for an Australian ophthalmic private clinical practice setting. The Australian Glaucoma POEM consists of eight items related to the patient’s understanding of the diagnosis and management, acceptability of the treatment, whether they feel their glaucoma is getting worse, interfering with their daily life and concerns regarding loss of vision as well as addressing whether they feel safe under the care of their glaucoma team and how well their care is organised.

Results

Two hundred and two patients (M:F 91:111) participated in the study. Mean ± standard deviation for subject age was 69 ± 13 years. Patient’s overall perception of their treatment and outcome was favourable. Younger patients felt their glaucoma interfered more with their daily lives and were more worried about losing vision from glaucoma. The greater the number of medications in use, the more they felt their glaucoma was getting worse and that glaucoma interfered with their daily lives. With all other variables accounted for by the multivariate linear model, female patients more strongly agreed that they understood their glaucoma diagnosis and glaucoma management. The patients with a severe visual defect in their worse eye, reported a greater perceived understanding of their glaucoma diagnosis and management and that they felt that glaucoma had a greater interference on their daily life. They were also more concerned about losing vision from glaucoma than their fellow glaucoma patients with less severe or no visual field deficit in the worse eye.

Conclusions

The modified POEM demonstrates potential to capture the concerns of a practice’s glaucoma cohort with a view to enhancing the quality of glaucoma care delivered.

Short-term Efficacy and Safety of a Latanoprost/Carteolol Fixed Combination Switched From Concomitant Therapy to in Patients With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension

PURPOSE

We prospectively investigated the efficacy and safety of switching from concomitant latanoprost and carteolol hydrochloride (CH) to a latanoprost/carteolol fixed combination (LCFC) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 43 patients (43 eyes) who were using latanoprost (once daily in the evening) and CH (once daily in the morning) concomitantly were switched to LCFC (once daily in the morning) with no washout interval. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in intraocular pressure (IOP) between baseline (before switching) and 1 and 3 months after switching. Systemic blood pressure and pulse rate, corneal epithelial defects, and tear film break-up time (TBUT) were also compared before and 1 and 3 months after switching. A questionnaire was administered 1 month after switching to investigate ocular comfort and treatment preferences. Adverse reactions and dropouts were recorded.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in IOP after switching to LCFC (15.0±2.6, 15.1±2.4, and 15.0±2.4 mm Hg at baseline and at 1 and 3 months, respectively). There was a significant decrease in corneal epithelial defects and significant increase in TBUT, without significant changes in systemic blood pressure or pulse rate. Three patients (7.3%) preferred concomitant latanoprost and CH; 33 (80.5%) preferred the LCFC. One patient each (9.3%) discontinued treatment because of foreign body sensation, blepharitis, increased IOP, or loss to follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching from concomitant latanoprost and CH to LCFC led to similar IOP control with good safety and patient acceptance, at least in the short term.

[The role of fixed dose combinations in the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma]

A great number of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma require combination therapy with several hypotensive drugs of different pharmacological groups to efficiently compensate the intraocular pressure (IOP) and prevent further development of glaucoma. Although glaucoma treatment usually starts with monotherapy, several preparations administered simultaneously have stronger hypotensive effect further increased by their additive action. However, the increased frequency of instillations may lead to drug washout and decreased patient compliance. Fixed dose combinations (FDCs) are a pharmacological form of eye drops that combines two or more active drugs in a single dosage form. The frequency of FDCs administration does not exceed two per day, which is convenient for long-term application and helps improve patient compliance. FDCs tolerability tends to be higher than that of simultaneous instillations of separate monotherapy drugs, while the hypotensive in clinical trials is comparable, in some real practice trials is superior. A review of existing studies showed that FDCs are superior to monotherapy in terms of cost-effectiveness. The use of FDCs was found to be beneficial for glaucoma treatment from the viewpoints of both reaching the target IOP for preserving visual functions in glaucoma patients, and minimizing the long-term treatment costs.

Effectiveness and safety of switching from prostaglandin analog monotherapy to prostaglandin/timolol fixed combination therapy or adding ripasudil

PURPOSE

To compare the effectiveness and safety of either switching from topical prostaglandin (PG) analog monotherapy to topical PG/timolol fixed combination therapy or adding topical ripasudil therapy.

STUDY DESIGN

An open-label, prospective, randomized, parallel group, comparative study METHODS: Fifty-one patients (51 eyes) with primary open-angle glaucoma who experienced insufficient intraocular pressure (IOP) control while taking a PG analog were enrolled. The participants were divided into the following treatment groups: PG/timolol fixed combination (switched group) or ripasudil therapy addition (added group). Blood pressure, IOP, and pulse rate were measured at baseline and after 1 and 3 months of study treatment. Adverse reactions and decreased effectiveness were examined.

RESULTS

The mean IOP after 3 months of therapy was 14.3 ± 2.2 mmHg in the switched group and 14.7 ± 3.0 mmHg in the added group, both of which were significantly lower than those at baseline (switched, 16.3 ± 3.0 mmHg; added, 16.6 ± 2.8 mmHg; both P < .001). At 3 months, the IOP was reduced by 2.0 ± 1.7 mmHg (11.7 ± 9.6%) in the switched group and by 1.8 ± 2.1 mmHg (10.7 ± 12.5%) in the added group. In the added group, the diastolic blood pressure after 1 month of therapy was significantly lower than that at baseline (P < .05). In the switched group, 10 (40.0%) and 2 (8.0%) participants experienced adverse reactions at 1 and 3 months, respectively. In the added group, 6 (23.1%) and 4 (15.4%) participants experienced adverse reactions at 1 and 3 months, respectively. Treatment was discontinued in 4 participants (16.0%) in the switched group and in 1 participant (3.8%) in the added group.

CONCLUSION

Treatment changes involving either switching from a PG analog to PG/timolol fixed combination eye drops or adding ripasudil to PG analog therapy were equally safe and effective in reducing IOP.

Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Prostaglandin Analog Therapy to Prostaglandin / Timolol Fixed Combination or Prostaglandin / Brimonidine Therapy

Background:

To compare the safety and efficacy between switching to prostaglandin/timolol fixed combination eye drops (PG/timolol FCs) and adding brimonidine to PG analogue monotherapy.

Methods:

Eyes of 53 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who were receiving PG analogue monotherapy were included. Participants were randomly divided into two treatment groups: one was prescribed PG/timolol FCs (switched group), and for the other, 0.1% brimonidine was added to the PG analogue (added group). Intraocular pressure (IOP), blood pressure, and pulse rate were measured after 1 and 3 months and compared to baseline values. Participants were also surveyed to determine if they had experienced systemic or topical adverse events at each study visit. IOP changes at 1 and 3 months were compared between groups.

Results:

Three months after changing medication, mean IOP was 14.6 ± 2.4 mmHg in the switched group and 13.7 ± 1.8 mmHg in the added group; both were significantly lower than the baseline values (switched group, 16.5 ± 2.7 mmHg; added group, 15.8 ± 2.3 mmHg; both P < 0.001). Neither the mean nor the percentage reductions in IOP were significantly different between groups at 1 and 3 months. In the added group, diastolic blood pressure was lower than that at 1 and 3 months, systolic blood was lower than that at 3 months (P < 0.01). The patients who had experienced systemic or topical adverse events were 53.8% in the added group and 40.7% in the the changed group, which was equivalent between groups (P =0.4142). Three patients (11.5%) in the added group, but none from the switched group, were excluded from analyses because of adverse events (not significant, P = 0.217).

Conclusion:

Switching from a PG analogue to PG/timolol FCs or to PG with brimonidine was equally safe (systemically and topically) and effective in reducing IOP. Thus, PG with brimonidine might be appropriate medication in patients who cannot use PG/timolol FCs due to repiratory or circulatory disease.

The efficacy and safety of bimatoprost/timolol maleate, latanoprost/timolol maleate, and travoprost/timolol maleate fixed combinations on 24-h IOP

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of bimatoprost/timolol maleate fixed combination (BTFC), latanoprost/timolol maleate fixed combination (LTFC), and travoprost/timolol maleate fixed combination (TTFC) on 24-h intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with open-angle glaucoma.

METHODS

This prospective, observer-masked, randomized study included 50 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. All patients were using hypotensive lipids and timolol maleate fixed combination treatment for ≥4 weeks and had an IOP ≤ 21 mmHg. Group 1 (n = 18) received BTFC, group 2 (n = 14) received LTFC, and group 3 (n = 18) received TTFC. All patients were hospitalized, and IOP was monitored for 24-h (10:00, 14:00, 18:00, 22:00, 02:00, and 06:00). Mean diurnal IOP variation measurements were taken between 06:00 and 18:00, and mean nocturnal IOP variation measurements were taken between 22:00 and 02:00. Mean IOP and IOP variation in the three groups were compared.

RESULTS

Mean 24-h IOP did not differ significantly between the three groups (group 1: 14.6 ± 2.9 mmHg; group 2: 14.1 ± 3.7 mmHg and group 3: 15.8 ± 2.0 mmHg; P > 0.05). Mean diurnal IOP variation was 4.6 ± 2.3 mmHg in group 1, 5.8 ± 2.4 mmHg in group 2, and 4.3 ± 1.7 mmHg in group 3, and mean nocturnal IOP variation was 3.2 ± 2.8 mmHg in group 1, 2.9 ± 1.9 mmHg in group 2, and 3.0 ± 1.6 mmHg group 3. There were not any significant differences in diurnal or nocturnal IOP variation between the three groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

All three fixed combinations effectively controlled IOP for 24-h and had a similar effect on diurnal and nocturnal IOP variations.

Brinzolamide/timolol versus dorzolamide/timolol fixed combinations: A hospital-based, prospective, randomized study

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of brinzolamide/timolol (BT) and dorzolamide/timolol (DT) fixed combinations on intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction.

METHODS

Patients with primary open angle glaucoma or normal tension glaucoma were randomized to receive either BT or DT. IOPs were measured at baseline, 2 weeks, and 1, 2, and 3 months. The primary outcome measures were the mean change in IOP from baseline at each visit. Secondary outcome measures included the tolerability of each fixed combination.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients (73 eyes) were included; 37 eyes in BT group and 36 eyes in DT group. Baseline mean IOP were 24.14 ± 4.5 and 29.53 ± 6 mmHg for BT and DT, respectively (P < 0.001). Both BT and DT provided statistically significant mean IOP reductions from baseline values within each group at all study visits (P < 0.001). DT provided greater mean IOP reductions from baseline than BT at each visit which was statistically significant at 2 weeks (P = 0.037). Mean percentage of IOP reduction was 24.35% and 46.33% at 2 weeks (P < 0.001), and 24.65% and 47% at 3 months (P < 0.001) for BT and DT, respectively. Patients' tolerability appeared to be better for DT than for BT with complete ocular comfort without any ocular adverse effects in 31 patients (81.1%) in DT group and 11 patients (29.7%) in BT group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Both drops provide effective IOP reduction which was greater, and patients were more likely to achieve lower target pressures with DT than with BT.

Fixed combination of travoprost and timolol maleate reduces intraocular pressure in Japanese patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: analysis by prostaglandin analogue

BACKGROUND

We have shown a decrease in mean intraocular pressure (IOP) by switching to travoprost/timolol fixed combination (TTFC) in subjects receiving prostaglandin analogue (PGA) monotherapy and requiring additional medication in a previous report. For analyzing factors affecting IOP reduction, baseline IOP and preceding PGA were selected as statistically and clinically significant factors. In this report, we examine IOP-lowering effect and adverse drug reactions by preceding PGA.

METHODS

Patients with primary open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who received monotherapy with one of four PGAs (travoprost, latanoprost, tafluprost, or bimatoprost) for at least 3 months at 26 institutions and were determined to require additional medication by their primary physician were included. IOP reduction and adverse events were examined at 4, 8, and 12 weeks for each of four PGAs after switching to TTFC.

RESULTS

In total, 157 patients who could be followed up for at least 4 weeks after switching to TTFC were included in the efficacy analysis. Multiple regression analysis was performed, and baseline IOP and PGA were found to be significant factors to IOP reduction. IOP reduction at week 12, adjusted with the regression model, was -3.5, -1.8, and -1.4 mmHg in the tafluprost, latanoprost, and travoprost groups, whereas it was -0.5 mmHg in the bimatoprost group. Along with differences in baseline IOP between groups, an IOP-lowering effect of >1 mmHg was noted in the tafluprost, latanoprost, and travoprost groups after the switch. IOP was maintained at 13.8-14.8 mmHg throughout the follow-up period. No serious adverse events or noteworthy issues were observed in any group after the switch.

CONCLUSION

Clinically significant IOP-reducing effects of TTFC were observed in the latanoprost, travoprost, and tafluprost groups when switching from each PGA monotherapy, while there were some differences in effects between groups, with minimal safety concerns.

Preservative-free bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination in patients with glaucoma in clinical practice

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of, and compliance to, preservative-free (PF), fixed-combination (FC) bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension in a clinical practice setting.

Patients and methods

This open-label study observed patients switched to PF FC bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% due to insufficient intraocular pressure (IOP) control on previous therapies. IOP was measured at baseline and at ~12 weeks. Tolerability and continuation of therapy were also assessed.

Results

A total of 1,553 patients were included in the study, and the per-protocol population comprised 1,391 patients. There were some minor deviations from protocol: some patients with no prior therapy and some who switched for reasons other than insufficient IOP control were included in the analysis. The mean IOP was reduced by 27.4%, from 22.2 mmHg to 16.1 mmHg. In subgroup analyses, the mean IOP was significantly reduced from baseline, irrespective of whether previous treatment was monotherapy or combination therapy, and preserved or PF therapy. Physicians mostly (88.1%) reported the IOP-lowering efficacy of PF FC bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% to be as expected or better than expected. Switching to PF FC bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% resulted in reductions from baseline in the number of patients reporting ocular symptoms. Adverse events were reported by 6.2% of patients, the most common being eye irritation (1.6%) and eye pruritus (1.0%). Physicians reported treatment compliance as better or unchanged compared with prior treatment in almost all patients (93.9%). Most patients were expected to continue PF FC bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% after the end of the study.

Conclusion

Switching to PF FC bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% was associated with significant IOP reductions from baseline over 12 weeks. Adverse events were uncommon, and compliance was high compared with previous therapy. PF FC bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% may be a suitable treatment for patients with inadequately controlled IOP or who are sensitive to preservatives.

24-h Efficacy of Glaucoma Treatment Options

Current management of glaucoma entails the medical, laser, or surgical reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) to a predetermined level of target IOP, which is commensurate with either stability or delayed progression of visual loss. In the published literature, the hypothesis is often made that IOP control implies a single IOP measurement over time. Although the follow-up of glaucoma patients with single IOP measurements is quick and convenient, such measurements often do not adequately reflect the untreated IOP characteristics, or indeed the quality of treated IOP control during the 24-h cycle. Since glaucoma is a 24-h disease and the damaging effect of elevated IOP is continuous, it is logical that we should aim to understand the efficacy of all treatment options throughout the 24-h period. This article first reviews the concept and value of diurnal and 24-h IOP monitoring. It then critically evaluates selected available evidence on the 24-h efficacy of medical, laser and surgical therapy options. During the past decade several controlled trials have significantly enhanced our understanding on the 24-h efficacy of all glaucoma therapy options. Nevertheless, more long-term evidence is needed to better evaluate the 24-h efficacy of glaucoma therapy and the precise impact of IOP characteristics on glaucomatous progression and visual prognosis.

Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Latanoprost/Timolol versus Travoprost/Timolol Fixed Combinations for Ocular Hypertension Associated with Uveitis

PURPOSE

To compare latanoprost/timolol (LT) versus travoprost/timolol (TT) fixed combinations for ocular hypertension (OHT) associated with uveitis.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients (55 eyes) who were treated with LT (28 eyes) or TT (27 eyes) for OHT associated with uveitis were reviewed retrospectively. Intraocular pressure (IOP) and inflammation scores at the initiation of treatment and at the last visit during therapy were analyzed.

RESULTS

Although IOP was reduced significantly in both LT and TT groups, the reduction rate was significantly greater with TT group than with LT. The differences in the reduction of IOP between the groups remained significant when the cases were classified into inflammation-induced OHT and steroid-induced OHT. Inflammation score was not exacerbated by LT or TT treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Both LT and TT are safe and effective for the treatment of OHT associated with uveitis and greater IOP reduction may be achieved by TT than by LT treatment.

Fixed Combination of Travoprost and Timolol Maleate Reduces Intraocular Pressure in Japanese Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: A Prospective Multicenter Open-Label Study

Introduction

The efficacy of lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) and safety of switching to travoprost/timolol fixed combination ophthalmic solution (Duotrav^®, Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, normal tension glaucoma or ocular hypertension undergoing prostaglandin analog (PGA) monotherapy was investigated.

Methods

Patients treated with travoprost, latanoprost, tafluprost, or bimatoprost for ≥3 months and requiring additional medication were switched to Duotrav without washout. Baseline IOP was calculated from measurements at two visits during PGA monotherapy. IOP reductions at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after switching to Duotrav and adverse events were assessed.

Results

Of 162 patients enrolled, 157 patients (96.9%) with ≥4 weeks of follow-up after switching to Duotrav were analyzed. The mean IOP decreased significantly (baseline = 16.3 ± 3.1 mmHg; 4 weeks = 14.6 ± 3.1 mmHg, 8 weeks = 14.7 ± 3.3 mmHg, 12 weeks = 14.6 ± 3.2 mmHg; all P < 0.0001). When study eyes were divided into three groups according to baseline IOP (≥19 mmHg: 33 eyes, 21.0%; ≥15 to <19 mmHg: 78 eyes, 49.7%; <15 mmHg: 46 eyes, 29.3%), all groups showed significant IOP reductions (P = 0.0324 ~ P < 0.0001) after switching to Duotrav. Twenty-seven of 166 patients (16.3%) in the safety analysis experienced adverse events and 26/166 patients (15.7%) experienced adverse events, for which a relationship to Duotrav could not be ruled out. Adverse events in five patients led to treatment discontinuation (eye pruritus; eye irritation; increased blood pressure and rash; increased blurred vision; deepening of the eyelid sulcus and blepharoptosis). Twelve weeks after treatment switching, eyelash changes, blepharal pigmentation and deepening of the eyelid sulcus occurred in 42 (26.8%), 29 (18.5%), and 13 (8.3%) cases, respectively, among 157 patients with follow-up. There was no significant worsening from baseline for superficial punctate keratopathy (SPK) or conjunctival hyperemia after switching (SPK score: baseline = 0.58 ± 1.31; 12 weeks = 0.92 ± 1.76, P = 0.1819; conjunctival hyperemia score: baseline = 0.41 ± 0.64; 12 weeks = 0.49 ± 0.63, P = 0.3774).

Conclusion

Our findings confirm that switching to Duotrav^® in PGA monotherapy patients shows IOP-lowering effect with minimal safety concerns.

Funding

Japan Association of Health Service and Alcon Japan. Ltd.

Trial registration

UMIN Clinical Trials Registry identifier, UMIN000007028.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12325-015-0246-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Identifying content for the glaucoma-specific item bank to measure quality-of-life parameters

PURPOSE

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have become essential clinical trial end points. However, a comprehensive, multidimensional, patient-relevant, and precise glaucoma-specific PRO instrument is not available. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify content for a new, glaucoma-specific, quality-of-life (QOL) item bank.

METHODS

Content identification was undertaken in 5 phases: (1) identification of extant items in glaucoma-specific instruments and the qualitative literature; (2) focus groups and interviews with glaucoma patients; (3) item classification and selection; (4) expert review and revision of items; and (5) cognitive interviews with patients.

RESULTS

A total of 737 unique items (extant items from PRO instruments, 247; qualitative articles, 14 items; focus groups and semistructured interviews, 476 items) were identified. These items were classified into 10 QOL domains. Four criteria (item redundancy, item inconsistent with domain definition, item content too narrow to have wider applicability, and item clarity) were used to remove and refine the items. After the cognitive interviews, the final minimally representative item set had a total of 342 unique items belonging to 10 domains: activity limitation (88), mobility (20), visual symptoms (19), ocular surface symptoms (22), general symptoms (15), convenience (39), health concerns (45), emotional well-being (49), social issues (23), and economic issues (22).

CONCLUSIONS

The systematic content identification process identified 10 QOL domains, which were important to patients with glaucoma. The majority of the items were identified from the patient-specific focus groups and semistructured interviews suggesting that the existing PRO instruments do not adequately address QOL issues relevant to individuals with glaucoma.

Bimatoprost/timolol versus travoprost/timolol fixed combinations in an Egyptian population: a hospital-based prospective randomized study

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of bimatoprost/timolol (BTFC) or travoprost/timolol (TTFC) fixed combinations on intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction in an Egyptian population.

METHODS

Patients with primary open angle glaucoma were randomized to receive either BTFC or TTFC. IOPs were measured at baseline, 2 weeks, and 1, 2, 4, and 6 months. The primary outcome measure was the mean change in IOP from baseline at each visit. Secondary outcome measures included the incidence of adverse events.

RESULTS

Eighty patients (80 eyes) were included finally: 40 eyes in each group. Baseline mean IOPs were 24.78±3.53 and 25.26±3.51 mm Hg for BTFC and TTFC, respectively (P=0.344). Both drops provided statistically significant IOP reductions from baseline at all visits (P<0.001). BTFC provided greater significant mean IOP reductions from baseline than TTFC at each visit (P<0.001). Mean IOP reductions were 11.34 and 6.42 mm Hg at 2 weeks (P=0.000), and 11.17 and 7.89 mm Hg at 6 months (P=0.001) for BTFC and TTFC, respectively. IOPs at 2 weeks were ≤18 mm Hg in 36 (90.8%) versus 22 (55%) eyes and ≤16 mm Hg in 28 (70%) versus 16 (40%) eyes (P<0.001), and at 6 months, ≤18 mm Hg in 38 (95%) versus 28 (70%) eyes and ≤16 mm Hg in 30 (75%) versus 18 (45%) eyes for BTFC and TTFC, respectively (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Both drops provided effective IOP reduction that was greater and patients were more likely to achieve lower target pressures with BTFC than with TTFC.

Efficacy and tolerability of fixed-combination bimatoprost/timolol versus fixed-combination dorzolamide/brimonidine/timolol in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: a multicenter, prospective, crossover study

BACKGROUND

Fixed-combination ocular hypotensives have multiple advantages, but triple-therapy dorzolamide/brimonidine/timolol (dorz/brim/tim) is only available in Latin and South America, and information on its relative efficacy is limited. This study compares the efficacy and tolerability of fixed-combination bimatoprost/timolol (bim/tim) and dorz/brim/tim in Mexican patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

METHODS

In this investigator-masked, crossover study, patients with unmet target intraocular pressure (IOP) on once-daily bim/tim or twice-daily dorz/brim/tim received the opposite medication for 3 months before returning to their pre-baseline medication for 3 months. IOP was evaluated before and after morning instillation at months 2, 3, 5 and 6. Primary endpoints were mean IOP change and Ocular Surface Disease Index© (OSDI) score at each visit. The intent-to-treat population was the a priori analysis population, but due to the number of discontinuations, the per-protocol and intent-to-treat populations were used for the primary efficacy and sensitivity analyses, respectively.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight and 56 patients were included in the intent-to-treat and per-protocol populations, respectively. At month 3, statistically significant IOP reductions from baseline were observed in the bim/tim (P < 0.01) and dorz/brim/tim (P < 0.0001) groups, regardless of assessment time. At month 6, patients returned to bim/tim exhibited no significant IOP increase (regardless of assessment time), but patients returned to dorz/brim/tim exhibited a statistically significant IOP increase (P < 0.001) when assessed before instillation of study treatment. Results were similar in both intent-to-treat and per-protocol analysis populations. In the per-protocol analysis, 70% of patients on bim/tim at month 3 had an IOP <14 mm Hg, which declined to 58% (P = 0.0061) at month 6 (ie, after 3 months of dorz/brim/tim treatment). In patients receiving dorz/brim/tim at month 3, 38% had an IOP <14 mm Hg, which remained comparable after return to bim/tim. OSDI scores and incidence of adverse events were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first direct comparison of the efficacy of dorz/brim/tim and bim/tim, patients switched from dorz/brim/tim to bim/tim demonstrated improved/lower IOP; when returned to dorz/brim/tim, IOP increased to levels seen at study initiation, suggesting that once-daily bim/tim may have greater IOP-lowering efficacy. Both bim/tim and dorz/brim/tim were well tolerated with minimal ocular surface damage.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01737853 (registered October 9, 2012).

The Efficacy of a Latanoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination Versus Latanoprost and Timolol Gel-forming Solution Unfixed Combination on Daytime Intraocular Pressure

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of a latanoprost/timolol fixed combination (LTFC) versus a latanoprost and timolol gel-forming solution unfixed combination (LTuFC) on daytime intraocular pressure (IOP) levels and fluctuations.

METHODS

This was an 8-week, randomized, parallel-group study. Ninety eyes of 90 patients diagnosed with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension that were insufficiently controlled with latanoprost monotherapy were enrolled. Randomized patients received either a single evening dose of LTFC or unfixed combination of latanoprost administered once daily in the evening and timolol gel-forming solution administered once daily in the morning without a washout period. IOP measurements were taken at 8 AM, 11 AM, 2 PM, and 5 PM. The mean IOP, daytime IOP measurements, and fluctuation in IOP were assessed at weeks 4 and 8.

RESULTS

The mean IOP reduction from baseline to each visit was significant in both groups (P<0.01). There was a significant difference in the mean IOP between groups at week 4 (P=0.0021). At week 8, the mean IOP reduction was 3.2 ± 2.1 and 5.7 ± 3.2 mm Hg in LTFC and LTuFC groups, respectively, and the difference was significant (P=0.001). A decrease in the daytime IOP fluctuation was observed in both groups over time, but the decrease in each group was not significant. At week 8, the mean IOP measurements at 8 AM, 11 AM, 2 PM, and 5 PM in LTuFC group were significantly lower than in the LTFC group (P=0.024, 0.0001, 0.0008, and 0.0011, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The concomitant use of latanoprost and timolol gel-forming solution leads to a larger additional IOP reduction and lower daytime IOP levels as compared with the fixed combination.

Efficacy and safety of switching to latanoprost 0.005%-timolol maleate 0.5% fixed-combination eyedrops from an unfixed combination for 36 months

Purpose

We prospectively investigated the intraocular pressure (IOP)-reducing effect, the visual field-maintenance effect, and the adverse reactions caused by administration of latanoprost/timolol maleate fixed-combination eyedrops for 3 years.

Subjects and methods

The subjects were 162 patients (162 eyes) with glaucoma or ocular hypotension who were using latanoprost and timolol maleate eyedrops concomitantly. The latanoprost and timolol maleate eyedrop regimen was discontinued without any washout period and subsequently changed to a latanoprost–timolol maleate fixed-combination eyedrop regimen. IOP values before the change and at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months after the change were measured and compared. The Humphrey visual field test was conducted before the change and at 12, 24, and 36 months after the change, and mean-deviation values were compared. Adverse reactions were assessed at every checkup.

Results

The IOPs before the change and at 6–36 months after the change were 15.2±3.3 mmHg and 14.3–15.2 mmHg, respectively, and a significant decrease was observed at 36 months after the change (P<0.01). Mean-deviation values before the change and at 12–36 months after the change were −9.11±6.94 dB and −10.08 to −9.22 dB, respectively, and these values were not significantly different (P=0.2148). Within the 36-month period, the eyedrops were discontinued because of insufficient IOP decrease in 33 cases (20.4%) and adverse reactions in eleven cases (6.8%).

Conclusion

IOP and the visual field were maintained for 3 years when a latanoprost and timolol maleate eyedrop regimen was changed to a latanoprost–timolol maleate fixed-combination eyedrop regimen. However, administration of the latanoprost–timolol maleate fixed-combination eyedrops was discontinued in approximately 27% of cases because of insufficient IOP decrease and adverse reactions.

Comparison of latanoprost/timolol with carbonic anhydrase inhibitor and dorzolamide/timolol with prostaglandin analog in the treatment of glaucoma

Purpose. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of glaucoma patients to investigate how switching medications may affect intraocular pressure (IOP) management. Three concomitant medications were changed to two medications: one combination drop and one single-action drop. Associated adverse effects were also examined. Subjects and Methods. A total of 112 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension were examined. All patients were concomitantly using a prostaglandin (PG) analog, a β-blocker, and a carbonic anhydrate inhibitor (CAI). Fifty-five patients began using latanoprost (PG analog)/timolol (β-blocker) fixed-combination (LTFC) drops and a CAI (group 1), and 57 patients began using dorzolamide (CAI)/timolol fixed-combination (DTFC) drops and a PG analog (group 2). The IOP was measured every 6 months for 2 years following medication changes. Changes in visual field mean deviation (MD) and medication discontinuations were also examined. Results. There were no significant differences in IOP or MD values before and after medication changes in either group. The proportion of medication discontinuations, uncontrolled IOP, and adverse reactions was similar in both groups. Conclusion. Switching patients from multiple single-action medications to combination medications was not associated with changes in IOP, visual field testing results, or adverse event frequency.

A combined analysis of five observational studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a fixed combination of bimatoprost 0.03% and timolol (BTFC) in a clinical setting, in a large sample of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and insufficient intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering on prior therapy.

Methods

Patient data were combined (n = 5556) from five multicenter, observational, non-controlled, open-label studies throughout Europe. Patients were identified from 830 sites in Austria, France, Germany, The Netherlands, and Switzerland. Assessments were made at baseline, 6 weeks (in Austrian, German and Swiss centers), and 12 weeks in all centers.

Results

BTFC lowered mean IOP from baseline by 5.4 mmHg over the 12-week duration of the studies (P < 0.0001). At study entry, 92.9% of patients were receiving another ocular hypotensive medication. In patients with no previous treatment (n = 311), BTFC reduced IOP by −9.1 mmHg, corresponding to a reduction from baseline of 36.4% (P < 0.0001). In patients receiving prior therapy of a prostaglandin analog, a β-blocker, or a fixed combination, BTFC reduced IOP by a further 24.5%, 25.9%, and 21.4%, respectively. The majority of patients (90.3%) reported no adverse events. The most common adverse events were conjunctival hyperemia (3.2%) and eye irritation (2.8%). BTFC was rated as “good” or “very good” by 92.5% of physicians and 88.0% of patients. Most patients (96.3%) were equally or more compliant with BTFC than with their previous treatment.

Conclusion

In routine clinical practice, BTFC achieved consistent IOP lowering in both previously treated and untreated patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. BTFC was associated with significant IOP reductions, good tolerability, and good compliance.

Interventions for improving adherence to ocular hypotensive therapy

BACKGROUND

Poor adherence to therapy is a significant healthcare issue, particularly in patients with chronic disease such as open-angle glaucoma. Treatment failure may necessitate unwarranted changes of medications, increased healthcare expenditure and risk to the patient if surgical intervention is required. Simplifying eye drop regimes, providing adequate information, teaching drop instillation technique and ongoing support according to the patient need may have a positive effect on improving adherence.

OBJECTIVES

To summarise the effects of interventions for improving adherence to ocular hypotensive therapy in people with ocular hypertension (OHT) or glaucoma.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 6), MEDLINE (June 1946 to June 2012), EMBASE (June 1980 to June 2012), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (June 1937 to June 2012), PsycINFO (1806 to June 2012), PsycEXTRA (1908 to June 2012), Web of Science (1970 to June 2012), ZETOC (1993 to June 2012), OpenGrey (System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe) (www.opengrey.eu/), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. The electronic databases were last searched on 26 June 2012. We did not search the National Research Register (NNR) as this resource has now been now archived. We contacted pharmaceutical manufacturers to request unpublished data and searched conference proceedings for the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO), and the Annual Congress for the Royal College of Ophthalmologists (RCO).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that compared interventions to improve adherence to ocular hypotensive therapy for patients with OHT or glaucoma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two authors independently assessed the search results for eligibility and extracted data for included trials onto specifically designed forms. We did not pool data due to clinical and methodological heterogeneity.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixteen trials (1565 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Seven studies investigated some form of patient education. In six of these studies this education was combined with other behavioural change interventions including tailoring daily routines to promote adherence to eye drops. Eight studies compared different drug regimens (one of these trials also compared open and masked monitoring) and one study investigated a reminder device. The studies were of variable quality and some were at considerable risk of bias; in general, the length of follow-up was short at less than six months with only two studies following up to 12 months. Different interventions and outcomes were reported and so it was not possible to produce an overall estimate of effect. There was some evidence from three studies that education combined with personalised interventions, that is, more complex interventions, improved adherence to ocular hypotensive therapy. There was less information on other outcomes such as persistence and intraocular pressure, and no information on visual field defects, quality of life and cost. There was weak evidence as to whether people on simpler drug regimens were more likely to adhere and persist with their ocular hypotensive therapy. A particular problem was the interpretation of cross-over studies, which in general were not reported correctly. One study investigated a reminder device and monitoring but the study was small and inconclusive.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although complex interventions consisting of patient education combined with personalised behavioural change interventions, including tailoring daily routines to promote adherence to eye drops, may improve adherence to glaucoma medication, overall there is insufficient evidence to recommend a particular intervention. The interventions varied between studies and none of the included studies reported on the cost of the intervention. Simplified drug regimens also could be of benefit but again the current published studies do not provide conclusive evidence. Future studies should follow up for at least one year, and could benefit from standardised outcomes.

The Effects of Fixed Combination of Bimatoprost-Timolol and Travoprost-Timolol on Intraocular Pressure in Patients With Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension, Previously on Nonfixed Combination of Latanoprost and Timolol

PURPOSE

To compare the effects of fixed combination of bimatoprost-timolol and travoprost-timolol on intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

DESIGN

This was a prospective, randomized, observer-masked, crossover parallel comparison trial.

METHODS

Forty-one patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension on nonfixed combination of latanoprost and timolol with IOP of 21 mm Hg or less were randomized to either bimatoprost-timolol or travoprost-timolol fixed combinations for 8-week treatment period. Intraocular pressure was measured at 8 AM, 12 PM, 4 PM, and 8 PM at the baseline and at the end point. Conjunctiva hyperemia and superficial punctate keratopathy after treatment with each fixed combination therapy were assessed and compared with the baseline. Patients were then switched to the opposite drug without a medication-free period for another 8-week, and diurnal IOP measurement was repeated.

RESULTS

Bimatoprost-timolol fixed combination reduced the baseline mean diurnal IOP statistically significantly from 17.3 mm Hg [95% confidence interval (CI), 16.8-17.7 mm Hg] to 16.4 mm Hg (95% CI, 15.9-17.0 mm Hg) (P = 0.036). Travoprost-timolol fixed combination lowered the mean diurnal IOP to 17.1 mm Hg (95% CI, 16.5-17.7 mm Hg), but it was not significant. Direct comparison between the 2 fixed combinations showed no significant difference. Both fixed combinations had no significant effect on conjunctiva hyperemia. Interestingly, patients on travoprost-timolol fixed combination had significantly less superficial punctuate keratopathy (P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Both fixed combination of bimatoprost-timolol and travoprost-timolol had no significantly different ocular hypotensive effect. However, bimatoprost-timolol fixed combination produced additional IOP lowering in patients previously treated with nonfixed combination of latanoprost and timolol.

Efficacy and safety of a switch to latanoprost 0.005% + timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination eyedrops from latanoprost 0.005% monotherapy

Background

The purpose of this prospective study was to investigate the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect and safety of latanoprost 0.005% + timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination eyedrops, now available in Japan.

Materials and methods

Thirty-one patients diagnosed with primary open-angle glaucoma who had an insufficient intraocular pressure (IOP) decrease with latanoprost 0.005% eyedrop monotherapy were enrolled. The latanoprost 0.005% eyedrops were discontinued, and administration of latanoprost 0.005%/timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination eyedrops was initiated without any washout period. IOP was compared before and at months 1, 3, and 6 after the switch. The incidence of adverse reactions was investigated at every follow-up visit.

Results

Mean IOP was 17.3 ± 2.7 mmHg before the switch, 15.5 ± 2.6 mmHg one month after the switch, 14.9 ± 2.4 mmHg 3 months after the switch, and 15.1 ± 2.2 mmHg 6 months after the switch, indicating that IOP decreased significantly after the change. The IOP reduction rate was 9.9% ± 11.5% after one month, 13.1% ± 10.9% after 3 months, and 11.2% ± 11.8% after 6 months. Two patients (6.5%) discontinued therapy due to adverse reactions (one case each of itchiness and bradycardia).

Conclusion

When latanoprost 0.005% eyedrop monotherapy was replaced by latanoprost 0.005% + timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination eyedrops, IOP decreased significantly without increasing the frequency of administration, and safety was satisfactory.

Assessment of ocular hypotensive effect and safety 12 months after changing from an unfixed combination to a latanoprost 0.005% + timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination

Background

Latanoprost 0.005% + timolol maleate 0.5% combined eyedrops were recently made available in Japan. We prospectively investigated the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect, visual preservation effect, and adverse reactions of a one-year administration of this fixed combination.

Methods

The subjects included 162 eyes from 162 patients diagnosed with either primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and using an unfixed combination of latanoprost 0.005% and timolol maleate 0.5%. The unfixed combination was discontinued and replaced with the latanoprost 0.005% + timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination with no washout period. IOP was measured before (baseline) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the change. The mean deviation value of Humphrey field analysis was compared. Adverse reactions were examined at every follow-up.

Results

No significant differences were found between mean IOP values obtained at baseline (mean ± standard deviation, 15.2 ± 3.3 mmHg) 3 months (15.1 ± 3.2 mmHg), 6 months (15.3 ± 3.1 mmHg), 9 months (15.3 ± 3.1 mmHg), and 12 months (15.1 ± 3.2 mmHg) after the change from the unfixed to the fixed combination of eyedrops (P = 0.212). In addition, no significant differences were observed between mean deviation values obtained at baseline (−9.11 ± 6.94 dB) and 12 months (−10.08 ± 7.24 dB) after the change (P = 0.114). Thirty-one patients discontinued the fixed combination within 12 months of replacement, due to an insufficient IOP decrease (20 patients, 12.3%) and adverse reactions (11 patients, 6.8%).

Conclusion

Following replacement of two eyedrop medications (latanoprost 0.005% and timolol maleate 0.5%) by one fixed combination (latanoprost 0.005% + timolol maleate 0.5%), IOP and visual field were preserved. However, 20% of the patients discontinued the new treatment because of an insufficient IOP decrease and complaints of adverse reactions.

Ocular hypotensive effect and safety of travoprost 0.004%/timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination after change of treatment regimen from β-blockers and prostaglandin analogs

Introduction

Travoprost 0.004%/timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination eye drops are available in Japan. We prospectively investigated the intraocular pressure (IOP)-decreasing effect of travoprost 0.004%/timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination eye drops and the adherence of patients to the administration protocol.

Materials and methods

We studied 43 eyes from 43 patients diagnosed with primary open- angle glaucoma, who were using prostaglandin analogs and β-blockers. The prostaglandin analogs and β-blockers were discontinued, and the treatment regimen was changed to travoprost 0.004%/timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination eye drops without any washout period. IOP before and at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after the treatment change was evaluated and compared. A questionnaire about protocol adherence was administered 1 month after the treatment change.

Results

IOP was 15.7 ± 2.9 mmHg before the change, 15.5 ± 2.7 mmHg at 1 month after the change, 15.3 ± 3.6 mmHg at 3 months after the change, and 15.8 ± 3.2 mmHg at 6 months after the change, and none of the differences were significant (P = 0.191). The responses to the questionnaire showed that cases where eye drop administration was forgotten decreased after the treatment change. Moreover, because of changes in eye drops, 19.0% of patients had irritation. More than half (54.8%) of the patients preferred travoprost 0.004%/timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination eye drops. Seven patients (16.3%) discontinued eye drop use because of adverse reactions within 6 months after the change.

Conclusion

When the treatment regimen was changed from prostaglandin analogs and β-blockers to travoprost 0.004%/timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination eye drops, administration protocol adherence increased and IOP was preserved; however, adverse reactions appeared in about 16% of the cases.

Topical prostaglandin fixed combinations in UK primary care: observational study using data from the health improvement network

PURPOSE

To describe the use of 3 prostaglandin/timolol fixed combinations (FCs) in UK primary care, to summarize characteristics of recipients, and to assess 12-month persistence.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included first-time recipients of latanoprost/timolol FC, bimatoprost/timolol FC, or travoprost/timolol FC treated between April 1, 2007, and November 30, 2008, identified in The Health Improvement Network database, a large database of anonymized longitudinal electronic medical records of patients treated in UK primary care. Eligible patients were = 18 years old at the index date (date of first prescription). Persistence, defined as a gap =60 days between consecutive prescriptions, was assessed through 12 months post-index for each cohort (Cox proportional hazards models).

RESULTS

A total of 2,015 patients were included: latanoprost/timolol FC, n = 898 (44.6%); bimatoprost/timolol FC, n = 733 (36.4%); travoprost/timolol FC, n = 384 (19.1%). The mean age was approximately 72 years across cohorts (p = 0.792). Glaucoma was the diagnosis for >90% of patients in each cohort. Twelve-month persistence was similar across treatments: latanoprost/timolol FC: 38.2%; bimatoprost/timolol FC: 38.6%; travoprost/timolol FC: 38.3% (p = 0.985). Mean time to therapy change for nonpersistent patients was also similar: 143.3 ± 89.8, 151.0 ± 87.9, and 151.8 ± 87.7 days, respectively (p = 0.095). Among persistent patients, additional therapy was prescribed for 36.2%, 41.7%, and 41.5% of patients, respectively. Among nonpersistent patients, 64.0%, 70.4%, and 69.2%, respectively, restarted the index therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The largest proportion of first-time recipients of prostaglandin/beta-blocker FC products treated in UK primary care was prescribed latanoprost/timolol FC. Twelve-month persistence was similar (<40%) across the 3 FCs evaluated.

Balancing efficacy and tolerability of prostaglandin analogues and prostaglandin-timolol fixed combinations in primary open-angle glaucoma

BACKGROUND

Lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) is currently the only therapeutic approach that preserves visual function in primary open-angle glaucoma. In making treatment decisions for first- and second-line therapy, the clinician needs to provide an appropriate balance of efficacy and tolerability. Prostaglandin analogues (PGAs) are frequently used as first-line monotherapy, because of their efficacy and low risk of systemic side effects. Similarly, PGA-based fixed combinations are frequently used in patients who progress or fail to achieve the target IOP.

SCOPE

We have reviewed the literature on the management of primary open-angle glaucoma with PGAs, both as monotherapies and in fixed combinations.

FINDINGS

In the clinical trial and meta-analysis data identified, bimatoprost 0.03% seems to be associated with a greater overall ability to lower IOP compared with latanoprost, travoprost or tafluprost, at the cost of a slightly higher incidence of conjunctival hyperaemia. Studies indicate that patients' adherence to treatment is generally better with PGAs than with many other monotherapies. In patients requiring more than one IOP-lowering agent, fixed combination treatments may provide improved adherence and tolerability benefits compared with concomitant use of individual treatments. Bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination appears to be slightly more efficacious than latanoprost/timolol or travoprost/timolol, and tolerability differences between the fixed combinations appear to be slight, probably because the addition of timolol to the PGA component lessens the associated hyperaemia. Surveys on EU physician attitudes appear largely in line with these clinical data.

CONCLUSION

An appropriate balance between efficacy and tolerability ensures optimum IOP lowering and reduces the risk of non-adherence. PGAs largely fulfil this need as monotherapies and as components of combinations.

Pre-validation methods for developing a patient reported outcome instrument

Background

Measures that reflect patients' assessment of their health are of increasing importance as outcome measures in randomised controlled trials. The methodological approach used in the pre-validation development of new instruments (item generation, item reduction and question formatting) should be robust and transparent. The totality of the content of existing PRO instruments for a specific condition provides a valuable resource (pool of items) that can be utilised to develop new instruments. Such 'top down' approaches are common, but the explicit pre-validation methods are often poorly reported. This paper presents a systematic and generalisable 5-step pre-validation PRO instrument methodology.

Methods

The method is illustrated using the example of the Aberdeen Glaucoma Questionnaire (AGQ). The five steps are: 1) Generation of a pool of items; 2) Item de-duplication (three phases); 3) Item reduction (two phases); 4) Assessment of the remaining items' content coverage against a pre-existing theoretical framework appropriate to the objectives of the instrument and the target population (e.g. ICF); and 5) qualitative exploration of the target populations' views of the new instrument and the items it contains.

Results

The AGQ 'item pool' contained 725 items. Three de-duplication phases resulted in reduction of 91, 225 and 48 items respectively. The item reduction phases discarded 70 items and 208 items respectively. The draft AGQ contained 83 items with good content coverage. The qualitative exploration ('think aloud' study) resulted in removal of a further 15 items and refinement to the wording of others. The resultant draft AGQ contained 68 items.

Conclusions

This study presents a novel methodology for developing a PRO instrument, based on three sources: literature reporting what is important to patient; theoretically coherent framework; and patients' experience of completing the instrument. By systematically accounting for all items dropped after the item generation phase, our method ensures that the AGQ is developed in a transparent, replicable manner and is fit for validation. We recommend this method to enhance the likelihood that new PRO instruments will be appropriate to the research context in which they are used, acceptable to research participants and likely to generate valid data.

Role of fixed combinations in the management of open-angle glaucoma

The first-line option for lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) is a single hypotensive agent, but patients frequently require additional IOP-lowering agents to reach their target pressures. Disadvantages of this multi-therapy approach include washout effect, inconvenience and poor adherence. Fixed combinations (FCs) combine two or more hypotensive agents in a single bottle, providing a convenient once-daily therapy, which tends to improve adherence. FCs generally offer equivalent efficacy to concomitant use of the individual components, with equivalent or superior tolerability. Studies also show that FCs can be more cost effective than nonfixed combinations. In terms of optimizing IOP control, minimizing visual field deterioration, preventing visual disability and minimizing associated healthcare costs, FCs are an important component of glaucoma management.

Choosing appropriate patient-reported outcomes instrument for glaucoma research: a systematic review of vision instruments

PURPOSE

To identify vision Patient-Reported Outcomes instruments relevant to glaucoma and assess their content validity.

METHODS

MEDLINE, MEDLINE in Process, EMBASE and SCOPUS (to January 2009) were systematically searched. Observational studies or randomised controlled trials, published in English, reporting use of vision instruments in glaucoma studies involving adults were included. In addition, reference lists were scanned to identify additional studies describing development and/or validation to ascertain the final version of the instruments. Instruments' content was then mapped onto a theoretical framework, the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Two reviewers independently evaluated studies for inclusion and quality assessed instrument content.

RESULTS

Thirty-three instruments were identified. Instruments were categorised into thirteen vision status, two vision disability, one vision satisfaction, five glaucoma status, one glaucoma medication related to health status, five glaucoma medication side effects and six glaucoma medication satisfaction measures according to each instruments' content. The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25, Impact of Vision Impairment and Treatment Satisfaction Survey-Intraocular Pressure had the highest number of positive ratings in the content validity assessment.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a descriptive catalogue of vision-specific PRO instruments, to inform the choice of an appropriate measure of patient-reported outcomes in a glaucoma context.

Fixed combination of bimatoprost and timolol in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension with inadequate IOP adjustment

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and tolerability of a fixed combination of bimatoprost and timolol (BTFC) in a large patient sample in a clinical setting.

METHODS

In this multicenter, observational, noncontrolled, open-label study, patients (n = 1862) with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension were treated with BTFC. Assessments were made at baseline, six weeks, and three months.

RESULTS

Prior to starting BTFC, 92.3% of patients were taking other ocular hypotensive medications. In the overall group at three months, mean intraocular pressure was reduced from baseline (21.7 ± 4.5 mmHg and 21.8 ± 4.9 mmHg for the right and left eye, respectively) to 16.1 ± 3.0 mmHg for each eye (P < 0.0001). The majority of patients (92%) reported no adverse events. The most commonly reported adverse events (in >1% of patients) were eye irritation, and ocular and conjunctival hyperemia. Adherence to treatment was generally better than (35.4%) or the same as (57.5%) with prior therapy. BTFC tolerability was rated as excellent or good by 92.3% of physicians and 85.8% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large group of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension, treatment with BTFC was associated with consistent reductions in IOP, improved adherence to treatment, and good tolerability.

Comparison of Travoprost and Bimatoprost plus timolol fixed combinations in open-angle glaucoma patients previously treated with latanoprost plus timolol fixed combination

PURPOSE

To compare the ocular hypotensive effect of bimatoprost plus timolol and travoprost plus timolol fixed combinations in glaucoma patients whose disease was controlled but had not reached their target intraocular pressure (IOP) with the fixed combination of latanoprost plus timolol.

DESIGN

A 2 × 3-month, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-masked, cross-over clinical trial.

METHODS

Eighty-nine open-angle glaucoma (OAG) patients were included. After a 6-week run-in period with latanoprost plus timolol, patients were randomized to either travoprost plus timolol or bimatoprost plus timolol for 3 months. Patients then switched to the opposite therapy for 3 additional months. The primary end point was the comparison of mean daily IOP after 3 months of each treatment.

RESULTS

At baseline, mean IOP was 16.5 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, 16.0 to 17.0 mm Hg) with treatment with latanoprost plus timolol. Both bimatoprost plus timolol and travoprost plus timolol statistically significantly reduced the mean IOP from baseline (P < .0001). Mean IOP at month 3 was statistically significantly lower in the bimatoprost plus timolol group compared with the travoprost plus timolol group (14.7 mm Hg [95% confidence interval, 14.3 to 15.3 mm Hg] vs 15.4 mm Hg [95% confidence interval, 15.0 to 15.9 mm Hg]; P = .0041). IOP was lower during bimatoprost plus timolol treatment at all time points and statistical significance was reached at 8 am, 11 am, and 5 pm, but not at 2 pm and 8 pm. Both treatments showed similar tolerability profile.

CONCLUSIONS

Bimatoprost plus timolol and travoprost plus timolol can provide additional IOP-lowering effect in patients not fully controlled with latanoprost plus timolol. The observed additional IOP reduction was greater with bimatoprost plus timolol with a similar tolerability profile.

Long-term effect of latanoprost/timolol fixed combination in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension: a prospective, observational, noninterventional study

Background

Prospective, observational studies that enroll large numbers of patients with few exclusion criteria may better reflect actual ongoing clinical experience than randomized clinical trials. Our purpose was to obtain efficacy and safety information from a cohort of subjects exposed to latanoprost/timolol fixed combination (FC) for ≥18 months using a prospective, observational design.

Methods

In all, 577 office-based ophthalmologists in Germany switched 2339 patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension to latanoprost/timolol FC for medical reasons. Follow-up visits were scheduled for every 6 months over 24 months; physicians followed usual care routines. Intraocular pressure (IOP), visual field status, optic nerve head findings, and adverse events were recorded. Efficacy parameters were evaluated for the per protocol (PP) population; the safety population included subjects receiving ≥1 drop of FC. Physicians rated efficacy, tolerability, and subject compliance at month 24.

Results

Of the 2339 subjects switched to latanoprost/timolol FC (safety population), the primary reasons for switching were inadequate IOP reduction (78.2%) and desire to simplify treatment with once-daily dosing (29.4%; multiple reasons possible). In all, 1317 (56.3%) subjects completed the study, and 1028 (44.0%) were included in the PP population. Most discontinuations were due to loss to follow-up. Change in mean IOP from baseline to month 6 was -4.0 ± 4.31 mmHg, a reduction that was maintained throughout (P < 0.05 for change at all time points). By investigator assessments, optic disc parameters and visual field were stable over 24 months, and there was no relationship between IOP reduction over 24 months and development of a visual field defect. More than 90% of physicians rated latanoprost/timolol FC as "very good" or "good" for efficacy (PP population), tolerability, and compliance. The FC was safe and well tolerated. No change in iris color was reported by most subjects (83.1%) at month 24.

Conclusions

Over 24 months, latanoprost/timolol FC effectively lowers IOP levels and is well tolerated in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension who change from their previous ocular hypotensive therapy for medical reasons. Investigator assessments found optic disc parameters and visual field to be stable throughout 24 months of follow-up.

Clinical utility and differential effects of prostaglandin analogs in the management of raised intraocular pressure and ocular hypertension

Prostaglandin analogs (PGA) are powerful topical ocular hypotensive agents available for the treatment of elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). Latanoprost 0.005% and travoprost 0.004% are prodrugs and analogs of prostaglandin F2α. Bimatoprost 0.03% is regarded as a prostamide, and debate continues as to whether it is a prodrug. The free acids of all 3 PGAs reduce IOP by enhancing uveoscleral and trabecular outflow via direct effects on ciliary muscle relaxation and remodeling of extracellular matrix. The vast majority of clinical trials demonstrate IOP-lowering superiority of latanoprost, bimatoprost and travoprost compared with timolol 0.5%, brimonidine 0.2%, or dorzolamide 2% monotherapy. Bimatoprost appears to be more efficacious in IOP-lowering compared with latanoprost, with weighted mean difference in IOP reduction documented in one meta-analysis of 2.59% to 5.60% from 1- to 6-months study duration. PGAs reduce IOP further when used as adjunctive therapy. Fixed combinations of latanoprost, bimatoprost or travoprost formulated with timolol 0.5% and administered once daily are superior to monotherapy of its constituent parts. PGA have near absence of systemic side effects, although do have other commonly encountered ocular adverse effects. The adverse effects of PGA, and also those found more frequently with bimatoprost use include ocular hyperemia, eyelash growth, and peri-ocular pigmentary changes. Iris pigmentary change is unique to PGA treatment. Once daily administration and near absence of systemic side effects enhances tolerance and compliance. PGAs are often prescribed as first-line treatment for ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma.

Comparison of ocular hypotensive actions of fixed combinations of brimonidine/timolol and dorzolamide/timolol

OBJECTIVE

To compare brimonidine/timolol fixed combination (BrTFC; Combigan *) with dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination (DTFC; Cosopt dagger) in terms of ability to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, double-masked, crossover study. After 6 weeks of therapy with timolol maleate 0.5% twice daily, patients were randomized to BrTFC twice daily or DTFC twice daily for 6 weeks, before being crossed over to the other treatment arm for a further 6 weeks. At all follow-up visits, IOP was measured at 09.00 (pre-instillation) 12.00 and 16.00. The primary outcome measure was change in mean diurnal IOP from baseline at 6 weeks. The secondary outcome was percentage of patients with IOP <18 mmHg at 6 weeks. Data were analyzed from all patients who completed the study.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were randomized and 20 completed the study. Mean diurnal IOP (mean +/- standard deviation [SD]) was 20.28 +/- 2.03 mmHg at timolol-treated baseline. After 6 weeks, mean diurnal IOP was 16.28 +/- 2.07 mmHg following BrTFC and 17.23 +/- 2.29 mmHg following DTFC (difference: 0.95 mmHg, 95% CI 0.10-1.80, p = 0.03). Mean IOP at 09.00 was 20.95 +/- 2.31 mmHg at baseline. This was reduced to 15.85 +/- 2.56 mmHg following BrTFC and 17.55 +/- 2.67 mmHg following DTFC (difference: 1.70, 95% CI 0.80-2.60, p = 0.001). For the 12.00 and 16.00 timepoints, the mean changes from baseline in the two arms were comparable. Percentages of patients achieving a target IOP of <18 mmHg were 85% following BrTFC and 60% following DTFC (p = NS [not significant]). No treatment-related adverse events were reported with either therapy. Key limitations include the small size of the study population and the 6-week duration of treatment periods, which prevents drawing conclusions regarding long-term therapy.

CONCLUSION

Reductions from baseline in mean diurnal IOP and morning IOP were greater with BrTFC than with DTFC.

Safety and efficacy of changing to the travoprost/timolol maleate fixed combination (DuoTrav) from prior mono- or adjunctive therapy

Purpose:

To assess the safety and efficacy of changing to the travoprost/timolol fixed combination (TTFC) from other mono- or adjunctive therapies.

Patients and methods:

A prospective, open-label, observational cohort of primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertensive patients whose intraocular pressure (IOP) was uncontrolled on prior therapy or was not on target. Patients were changed from prior mono- or adjunctive treatment at Day 0 to TTFC dosed every evening and underwent active treatment efficacy and safety evaluations at Week 12.

Results:

In 474/522 (91%) patients who completed this trial an IOP (mm Hg) of 21.9 ± 2.0 on prior treatment was reduced by TTFC at Month 3: from all prior treatments 5.6 ± 2.6; from monotherapy 5.9 ± 2.3; from adjunctive treatments 4.5 ± 2.9; and from several of the most frequent individual treatments: timolol 5.7 ± 2.2; latanoprost 6.3 ± 2.6; and latanoprost/timolol fixed combination 4.4 ± 1.9. Ocular hyperemia was the most frequent adverse effect (n = 21, 4%). Both patients and physicians preferred TTFC compared to all prior and common individual treatments. The solicited symptom survey showed, following a modified Bonferroni correction (α/5), a reduced incidence with TTFC of ocular pain (P = 0.01) while the prior medicine had a lower incidence of burning on instillation (P < 0.001).

Conclusions:

Changing patients from prior mono- or adjunctive therapy to TTFC can provide on average a further reduction in IOP while demonstrating a favorable safety profile and a high patient preference.

Monitoring adherence rates in glaucoma patients using the Travatan Dosing Aid. A 6-month study comparing patients on travoprost 0.004% and patients on travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination

OBJECTIVE

To assess adherence in glaucoma patients using the Travatan Dosing Aid (TDA); to record differences in adherence by age, sex, therapy, systemic therapies, years from diagnosis, type of therapy and intraocular pressure (IOP).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Sixth-month cohort study; fifty-six Caucasian, primary open-angle glaucoma patients on travoprost (T) or travoprost/timolol fixed combination (TTFC) monotherapy were submitted to four visits: at baseline and months 1, 3 and 6 (M1, M3, M6). Adherence was recorded with TDA and classified as 'high' if greater than 90%. Self-reported and physician-presumed adherence data were collected. Kruskall-Wallis and Fisher's exact tests were applied.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients (54.2%) were treated with T. Age, sex, level of schooling, presence of systemic comorbidities, duration of current therapy and IOP were similar between T and TTFC. Seventeen subjects (30.3%) recorded high adherence at every visit, 13 (23.2%) at two visits, 26 (46.4%) otherwise. Adherence was maintained over time with a slight decrease from month 1 to month 6 without statistical differences within and between groups. Adherence was statistically influenced by age (p = 0.007) and duration of therapy (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

The typical nonadherent patient is elderly. TDA records indicate that only a minority of patients are really adherent: predictive models to screen for poor adherence are needed.

Predictors of additional intraocular pressure reduction in patients changed to latanoprost/timolol fixed combination

Background

Given the growing number of ocular hypotensive medications available, it is important to be able to predict a positive response to therapy. The purpose of the present study was to identify predictors of an additional 10% intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction after 12 weeks of treatment with latanoprost/timolol fixed combination (FC) in patients requiring a change in their previous ocular hypotensive medication.

Methods

This multicenter, open-label, prospective, phase IIIb study included subjects ≥18 years of age with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). Eligible subjects had baseline IOP ≥21 mmHg and insufficient response to current beta-blocker monotherapy. The primary efficacy analysis (logistic regression) identified predictors of a positive response after 12 weeks of latanoprost/timolol FC.

Results

The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included 383 subjects treated with ≥1 drop of FC and having ≥1 follow-up IOP assessment. Mean IOP was 22.19 ± 2.16 mmHg at baseline and was reduced by 5.42 ± 2.71 mmHg at study end. In all, 325 (84.9%) subjects had a positive response to latanoprost/timolol FC; the response rate was similar across groups: OAG (n = 208; 82.7%); OHT (n = 161; 87.6%); OAG+OHT (n = 14; 85.7%). Higher baseline IOP (odds ratio: 1.284; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.101, 1.497; p = 0.0014) and absence of adverse events (odds ratio: 0.318; 95% CI: 0.161, 0.629; p = 0.0010) were significant predictors of positive response. Age, gender, ethnic origin, diagnosis, family history of OAG/OHT, corneal thickness, and concomitant systemic beta-blocker were not significant predictors of a positive response in the ITT analysis. The FC was well tolerated. The most common adverse events were related to the eye and were consistent with known adverse events associated with latanoprost and timolol.

Conclusions

These results support the use of latanoprost/timolol FC in patients whose IOP is insufficiently controlled on beta-blocker monotherapy. Patients with higher baseline IOP levels and who do not experience adverse events while on therapy are most likely to achieve a positive response to latanoprost/timolol FC.

Trial Registration

Study registration number: NCT00230763

Glaucoma medication persistence with a fixed combination versus multiple bottles

OBJECTIVE

To determine if prescribing combination therapy versus two or three separate bottles results in greater persistence among patients with glaucoma.

METHODS

Using a retail pharmacy claims database, three glaucoma patient cohorts were defined and followed for 12 months (January 2004 through December 2004). Patients in cohort 1 had a prescription for a single fixed-combination therapy during the month of January 2004. Cohort 2 consisted of patients with prescriptions for a beta-blocker and one other glaucoma product in the same month. Cohort 3 comprised patients with prescriptions filled for three different glaucoma therapies during the first month. A fixed-combination formulation may have been included in cohorts 2 and 3 as well, but was counted as a single bottle. Persistence rate, defined as the percentage of patients who did not discontinue their medication over the 12-month period, was calculated.

RESULTS

Cohort 1 (one bottle; n = 14 742) was more persistent than cohort 2 (two bottles; n = 18 411), with 35.3% vs. 27.2% of patients remaining on therapy at the end of the study period (p < 0.0001). Cohort 3 (n = 4826), with three separate bottles per patient, had the lowest percentage remaining on therapy (23.9%; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Analyses of pharmacy database data are limited by the possibilities of misidentifying newly treated patients or misclassifying added versus switched medications. As the number of separate products used for glaucoma therapy increases, patient persistence decreases. A management regimen requiring as few products as possible may enhance glaucoma patient persistence.

Effects of some ophthalmic medications on pupil size: a literature review

Ophthalmological pharmacology is a rapidly expanding field aimed at achieving the safest and most effective treatment results. Physicians must be aware of the side-effect profiles, both beneficial and harmful, of medications currently used. This review highlights the available data on the effect of some ophthalmic medications on pupil size; it was limited to all reports or studies describing topical ophthalmic agents not originally designed or indicated to alter pupil diameter. This awareness will protect patients from unwanted drug-induced side effects and will improve clinical management and patient care.

Interventions for improving adherence to ocular hypotensive therapy

BACKGROUND

Poor adherence to therapy is a significant healthcare issue, particularly in patients with chronic disease such as open angle glaucoma. Treatment failure may necessitate unwarranted changes of medications, increased healthcare expenditure and risk to the patient if surgical intervention is required. Simplifying eye drop regimes, providing adequate information and ongoing support according to patient need, may have a positive effect on improving adherence.

OBJECTIVES

To summarise the effects of interventions for improving adherence to ocular hypotensive therapy in people with ocular hypertension (OHT) or glaucoma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, ZETOC and OpenSIGLE. In addition, we searched research registers of ongoing studies. We contacted pharmaceutical manufacturers to request unpublished data and searched conference proceedings for the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO), and the Annual Congress for the Royal College of Ophthalmologists (RCO). There were no language or date restrictions in the search for trials. The electronic databases were last searched on 15 January 2009.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi RCTs that compared interventions to improve adherence to ocular hypotensive therapy for patients with OHT or glaucoma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two authors independently assessed the search results for eligibility and extracted data for included trials onto specifically designed forms. We calculated the mean difference for continuous data and relative risks for dichotomous data. Where appropriate, we pooled data using a fixed-effect model.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight trials met the inclusion criteria. There was considerable heterogeneity of interventions and reported outcome measures and therefore, meta-analysis was limited to two studies. Overall, studies were not of high quality due to small sample sizes, missing data and short term follow-up. Three of five drug comparison studies provided evidence that reducing the frequency of drops can improve adherence. However, the study that compared the least frequent regime with one of the most complicated, showed no difference in reported adherence. A small study of thirteen patients found a reminder device beneficial to adherence levels yet only one of two studies involving education and individualised care planning was found to be successful.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Interventions involving simplified dosing regimes, reminder devices, education and individualised care planning, did show improvements in adherence rates. However, due to inadequate methodological quality and heterogeneity of study design we are unable to advocate any particular interventions at this time.

[Satisfaction and compliance of ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients topically treated with a combination therapy]

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate satisfaction and compliance in glaucoma and ocular hypertensive patients receiving a fixed combination treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After instilling a fixed combination, patients were asked to fill out a questionnaire about their satisfaction and compliance at baseline and 15 days after the onset of new therapy.

RESULTS

1693 glaucoma patients (G) and 621 ocular hypertensive (OHT) patients were included. Mean age was 65.6+/-11.7 years. Onset of disease was 7.2+/-6.6 years and 5.2+/-4.9 years for G and OHT patients, respectively. Insufficient efficacy of the previous topical treatment (monotherapy in 55% of cases) was the main cause for shifting to a fixed combination in 70% of cases. Satisfaction was increased in 15% of the patients and compliance was increased in 25% of the patients.

DISCUSSION

Fixed combination provides an easier regimen and therefore encourages better compliance, a key issue in a chronic disease such as glaucoma.