Facultative polyploidy in endocrine tissues

Cell Cycle Re-entry in the Nervous System: From Polyploidy to Neurodegeneration

Terminally differentiated cells of the nervous system have long been considered to be in a stable non-cycling state and are often considered to be permanently in G0. Exit from the cell cycle during development is often coincident with the differentiation of neurons, and is critical for neuronal function. But what happens in long lived postmitotic tissues that accumulate cell damage or suffer cell loss during aging? In other contexts, cells that are normally non-dividing or postmitotic can or re-enter the cell cycle and begin replicating their DNA to facilitate cellular growth in response to cell loss. This leads to a state called polyploidy, where cells contain multiple copies of the genome. A growing body of literature from several vertebrate and invertebrate model organisms has shown that polyploidy in the nervous system may be more common than previously appreciated and occurs under normal physiological conditions. Moreover, it has been found that neuronal polyploidization can play a protective role when cells are challenged with DNA damage or oxidative stress. By contrast, work over the last two and a half decades has discovered a link between cell-cycle reentry in neurons and several neurodegenerative conditions. In this context, neuronal cell cycle re-entry is widely considered to be aberrant and deleterious to neuronal health. In this review, we highlight historical and emerging reports of polyploidy in the nervous systems of various vertebrate and invertebrate organisms. We discuss the potential functions of polyploidization in the nervous system, particularly in the context of long-lived cells and age-associated polyploidization. Finally, we attempt to reconcile the seemingly disparate associations of neuronal polyploidy with both neurodegeneration and neuroprotection.

Adult stem cells for the treatment of neurological disease

The characteristic CNS responses to injury including increased cell production and attempts at regenerative repair - implicitly predicted where not directly demonstrated by Cajal, but only now more fully confirmed - have important implications for regenerative therapies. Spontaneous CNS cell replacement compares poorly with the regenerative functional repair seen elsewhere, but harnessing, stimulating or supplementing this process represents a new and attractive therapeutic concept.Stem cells, traditionally defined as clone-forming, self-renewing, pluripotent progenitor cells, have already proved themselves to be an invaluable source of transplantation material in several clinical settings, most notably haematological malignancy, and attention is now turning to a wider variety of diseases in which there may be potential for therapeutic intervention with stem cell transplantation. Neurological diseases, with their reputation for relentless progression and incurability are particularly tantalising targets. The optimal source of stem cells remains to be determined but bone marrow stem cells may themselves be included amongst the contenders.Any development of therapies using stem cells must depend on an underlying knowledge of their basic biology. The haemopoietic system has long been known to maintain circulating populations of cells with short life spans, and this system has greatly informed our knowledge of stem cell biology. In particular, it has helped yield the traditional stem cell model - a hierarchical paradigm of progressive lineage restriction. As cells differentiate, their fate choices become progressively more limited, and their capacity for proliferation reduced, until fully differentiated, mitotically quiescent cells are generated. Even this, however, is now under challenge.