Sentinel lymph node biopsy using tin colloid RI and blue dye method

Blue dye for identification of sentinel nodes in breast cancer and malignant melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The combined technique (radioisotope and blue dye) is the gold standard for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and there is wide variation in techniques and blue dyes used. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the need for radioisotope and the optimal blue dye for SLNB. A total of 21 studies were included. The SLNB identification rates are high with all the commonly used blue dyes. Furthermore, methylene blue is superior to iso-sulfan blue and Patent Blue V with respect to false-negative rates. The combined technique remains the most accurate and effective technique for SLNB. In order to standardize the SLNB technique, comparative trials to determine the most effective blue dye and national guidelines are required.

Accuracy and validity of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer using a photosensitizer: 8-year follow-up

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

We evaluated an alternative procedure for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for breast cancer after approval of the study by the Ethics Committee of Tokyo Medical University Hospital in 2004. We examined the efficacy and safety of SLNB using the photosensitizer talaporfin sodium (Laserphyrin®, Meiji Seika Pharma, Tokoyo, Japan), compared with current methods.

STUDY DESIGN/PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 21 breast cancer patients (Japanese women; median age, 54 years; range, 35-75). All patients received a breast cancer operation combined with SLNB between June 2004 and May 2005. Three milliliters of talaporfin solution was locally injected into the subareolar region just before the operation. We attempted to identify a sentinel lymph node (SLN) that exhibited fluorescence and was consistent with a radioisotope (RI) localization technique. Our purpose was to verify the accuracy and validity of the talaporfin fluorescence imaging method after 8 years of application.

RESULTS

There was no consistent correlation between fluorescence and pathological SLN metastasis, although all four cases of pathological SLN metastasis revealed positive fluorescence. In some cases in which we could not identify SLNs by the RI technique, we could identify SLNs using talaporfin. The method using talaporfin did not adversely affect the patients after the operation, even the chronic renal failure patient. After 8 years, all patients are alive, and none had lymph node recurrence. Side effects were not observed.

CONCLUSION

SLNB using the photosensitizer talaporfin sodium in breast cancer patients is considered to be useful as complementary to other current methods. We could evaluate the accuracy and validity of this method 8 years after all of the procedures were performed. In the future, a large-scale clinical study with statistical analyses should be conducted.

The false-negative rate of sentinel node biopsy in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In sentinel node surgery for breast cancer, procedural accuracy is assessed by calculating the false-negative rate. It is important to measure this since there are potential adverse outcomes from missing node metastases. We performed a meta-analysis of published data to assess which method has achieved the lowest false-negative rate.

METHODS

We found 3,588 articles concerning sentinel nodes and breast cancer published from 1993 through mid-2011; 183 articles met our inclusion criteria. The studies described in these 183 articles included a total of 9,306 patients. We grouped the studies by injection material and injection location. The false-negative rates were analyzed according to these groupings and also by the year in which the articles were published.

RESULTS

There was significant variation related to injection material. The use of blue dye alone was associated with the highest false-negative rate. Inclusion of a radioactive tracer along with blue dye resulted in a significantly lower false-negative rate. Although there were variations in the false-negative rate according to injection location, none were significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of blue dye should be accompanied by a radioactive tracer to achieve a significantly lower false-negative rate. Location of injection did not have a significant impact on the false-negative rate. Given the limitations of acquiring appropriate data, the false-negative rate should not be used as a metric for training or quality control.