Awareness, muscle relaxants and balanced anaesthesia

Anaesthetic interventions for prevention of awareness during surgery

BACKGROUND

General anaesthesia is usually associated with unconsciousness. 'Awareness' is when patients have postoperative recall of events or experiences during surgery. 'Wakefulness' is when patients become conscious during surgery, but have no postoperative recollection of the period of consciousness.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of two types of anaesthetic interventions in reducing clinically significant awareness:- anaesthetic drug regimens; and- intraoperative anaesthetic depth monitors.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, ISSUE 4 2016); PubMed from 1950 to April 2016; MEDLINE from 1950 to April 2016; and Embase from 1980 to April 2016. We contacted experts to identify additional studies. We performed a handsearch of the citations in the review. We did not search trial registries.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of either anaesthetic regimens or anaesthetic depth monitors. We excluded volunteer studies, studies of patients prior to skin incision, intensive care unit studies, and studies that only randomized different word presentations for memory tests (not anaesthetic interventions).Anaesthetic drug regimens included studies of induction or maintenance, or both. Anaesthetic depth monitors included the Bispectral Index monitor, M-Entropy, Narcotrend monitor, cerebral function monitor, cerebral state monitor, patient state index, and lower oesophageal contractility monitor. The use of anaesthetic depth monitors allows the titration of anaesthetic drugs to maintain unconsciousness.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two authors independently scanned abstracts, extracted data from the studies, and evaluated studies for risk of bias. We made attempts to contact all authors for additional clarification. We performed meta-analysis statistics in packages of the R language.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 160 studies with 54,109 enrolled participants; 53,713 participants started the studies and 50,034 completed the studies or data analysis (or both). We could not use 115 RCTs in meta-analytic comparisons because they had zero awareness events. We did not merge 27 of the remaining 45 studies because they had excessive clinical and methodological heterogeneity. We pooled the remaining 18 eligible RCTs in meta-analysis. There are 10 studies awaiting classification which we will process when we update the review.The meta-analyses included 18 trials with 36,034 participants. In the analysis of anaesthetic depth monitoring (either Bispectral Index or M-entropy) versus standard clinical and electronic monitoring, there were nine trials with 34,744 participants. The overall event rate was 0.5%. The effect favoured neither anaesthetic depth monitoring nor standard clinical and electronic monitoring, with little precision in the odds ratio (OR) estimate (OR 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59 to 1.62).In a five-study subset of Bispectral Index monitoring versus standard clinical and electronic monitoring, with 34,181 participants, 503 participants gave awareness reports to a blinded, expert panel who adjudicated or judged the outcome for each patient after reviewing the questionnaires: no awareness, possible awareness, or definite awareness. Experts judged 351 patient awareness reports to have no awareness, 87 to have possible awareness, and 65 to have definite awareness. The effect size favoured neither Bispectral Index monitoring nor standard clinical and electronic monitoring, with little precision in the OR estimate for the combination of definite and possible awareness (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.35 to 2.65). The effect size favoured Bispectral Index monitoring for definite awareness, but with little precision in the OR estimate (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.13 to 2.75).We performed three smaller meta-analyses of anaesthetic drugs. There were nine studies with 1290 participants. Wakefulness was reduced by ketamine and etomidate compared to thiopental. Wakefulness was more frequent than awareness. Benzodiazepines reduces awareness compared to thiopental, ketamine, and placebo., Also, higher doses of inhaled anaesthetics versus lower doses reduced the risk of awareness.We graded the quality of the evidence as low or very low in the 'Summary of findings' tables for the five comparisons.Most of the secondary outcomes in this review were not reported in the included RCTs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Anaesthetic depth monitors may have similar effects to standard clinical and electrical monitoring on the risk of awareness during surgery. In older studies comparing anaesthetics in a smaller portion of the patient sample, wakefulness occurred more frequently than awareness. Use of etomidate and ketamine lowered the risk of wakefulness compared to thiopental. Benzodiazepines compared to thiopental and ketamine, or higher doses of inhaled anaesthetics versus lower doses, reduced the risk of awareness.

Rapid Sequence Intubation from the Patient's Perspective

Introduction

This study assesses the efficacy of the rapid sequence intubation (RSI) protocol in preventing patient recollection of resuscitative events and patient discomfort during intubation, as subjectively determined by the patient.

Methods

This was a prospective study of all patients intubated at Los Angeles County, University of Southern California Medical Center from July 2009 to January 2010. Extubated patients were interviewed using a standard questionnaire and data collection tool.

Results

Of 211 airway codes, 201 were excluded due to death before extubation, transfer, or persistent vegetative state, leaving 10 awake, alert subjects who were interviewed regarding their recollection of the RSI and resuscitation. Five had recollection of the event. Most patients recalling RSI described the event as painful or uncomfortable despite receiving the recommended doses of sedation/induction agents.

Conclusion

In this cohort of 10 patients intubated using typical agents, 5 remembered some details of their intubation and 2 described pain that was 10/10 on a verbal pain scale. Further work is indicated to ensure that the medications used during this procedure provide the appropriate sedation and amnesia.

The in-vitro effects of sevoflurane and desflurane on the contractility of pregnant human uterine muscle

The effect of desflurane and sevoflurane on the contractility of the uterus was examined in vitro on strips of human myometrium obtained at the time of elective cesarean section. Small strips (1 mm x 2 mm x 10 mm) of muscle were prepared and suspended in an organ bath containing oxygenated physiological saline. Force of contraction was recorded continuously using an isometric tension transducer. Following the onset of regular spontaneous contractions, baseline measurements were obtained and the strips were exposed to varying concentrations of sevoflurane or desflurane corresponding to 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC). Sevoflurane depressed contractility to 72 +/- 18% of control at 0.5 MAC, 37 +/- 15% at 1.0 MAC and 27 +/- 16% at 1.5 MAC compared with 65 +/- 14 of control at 0.5 MAC, 43 +/- 18% at 1.0 MAC and 22 +/- 11% at 1.5 MAC for desflurane. The degree of depression of uterine muscle contractility produced by both these agents was significantly different from control at all concentrations. In conclusion, both sevoflurane and desflurane depress the contractility of isolated pregnant human myometrium at concentrations of 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 MAC. These agents produce a similar degree of depression of uterine muscle contractility.

[Intraoperative memory. A study of its incidence in general anesthesia in 326 patients]

OBJECTIVES

Measuring the incidence of intraoperative recall in our hospital.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred and twenty-six patients who underwent a general anaesthesia for elective surgery on selected sites (general, urology, ORL, gynaecology and obstetrical, vascular and cardiac, thoracic) were interviewed on the first or the second postoperative day using a standard questionnaire. When recall was suspected, the anaesthetist was consulted and the anaesthetic record was looked at in order to evaluate the authenticity of any recollections.

RESULTS

Four patients mentioned an anomaly evoking intra-operative recall. The reduction in the anaesthetic level would explain authentic recollection for one patient. The recollection of another patient could not be truly verified. The site was the same for these two cases and the anaesthetic protocol for digestive surgery comprised curare and droperidol. The recollections for the two other patients did not correspond to the intraoperative period. The incidence of this phenomenon on the totality of sites was 0.6 per cent.

CONCLUSION

This result conforms to other studies. This phenomenon is a quality indicator, but probably under estimated. Although retrospective, this evaluation is quick and easy. This research in post-operative period should be systematic in order to find the reason and to propose an early course of action for these patients. An analysis of the anaesthetic protocol is necessary when the frequency of intraoperative recall is too high.

Monitoring depth of anaesthesia

In clinical practice, indirect and non-specific signs are used for monitoring anaesthetic adequacy. These include haemodynamic, respiratory, muscular and autonomic signs. These measures do not indicate adequacy of anaesthesia in a reliable manner. Many attempts have been made to find a more accurate monitor. Direct monitoring of anaesthetic effect should be possible by EEG measurement. EEG information can be reduced, condensed and simplified, leading to single numbers (spectral edge frequency and median frequency). These methods appear insufficient for assessing anaesthetic adequacy. The bispectral index, derived from bispectral analysis of the EEG, is a very promising tool for measuring adequacy of anaesthesia. An alternative approach is to monitor evoked potentials. Middle latency auditory evoked potentials may be helpful in assessing anaesthetic adequacy. Both techniques need further validation.

Awareness in anaesthesia: incidence, consequences and prevention

Awareness during anaesthesia is a state of consciousness that is revealed by explicit or implicit memory of intraoperative events. Although large clinical surveys indicate an incidence of explicit awareness of < 0.3% during anaesthesia for general surgery, this adverse effect should be a great concern, because patients may be permanently disabled by the experience of being awake during surgery. Prevention of awareness during anaesthesia starts with an appropriate preoperative visit to the patient. The anaesthetic delivery machines must be properly checked before and during anaesthesia. The anaesthetic depth should be assessed by observation of movement responses, and consequently a minimum of muscle relaxants used. Because the anaesthetic depth can be controlled by determination of endtidal drug concentration, volatile inhaled anaesthesia may be associated with a lower frequency of awareness than other anaesthetic regimens.

Does monitoring end-tidal isoflurane concentration improve titration during general anesthesia?

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess the value of end-tidal anesthetic gas monitoring with respect to intraoperative hemodynamic stability and recovery times.

DESIGN

Randomized blinded study.

SETTING

Operating rooms at a university teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

120 ASA I and II patients receiving general anesthesia maintained with isoflurane and nitrous oxide (N2O).

INTERVENTIONS

Following a standardized induction technique, patients were assigned to either an end-tidal isoflurane monitored (n = 60) or unmonitored (n = 60) group. During each operation, the anesthesiologist attempted to maintain an adequate "depth of anesthesia" by varying the administered concentration of isoflurane with or without information from an end-tidal isoflurane monitor. Intraoperative hemodynamic stability was assessed by determining the variation from a preincisional "baseline" mean arterial pressure (MAP) value established during a 10 minute interval immediately prior to the surgical incision. Recovery times were recorded from discontinuation of isoflurane and N2O until awakening, orientation, and postanesthesia care unit discharge.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Intraoperative hemodynamic stability was assessed in each patient and reported as the average error from the baseline MAP, absolute average error from the baseline MAP, coefficients of variation of heart rate (HR), systolic and diastolic MAP, and end-tidal isoflurane concentrations. Both study groups had similar intraoperative MAP and HR values, average error and coefficients of variation for the hemodynamic variables, as well as similar numbers of episodes of hypertension, hypotension, tachycardia, and bradycardia. Finally, the two groups were comparable with respect to early recovery times and postoperative side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that end-tidal isoflurane monitoring does not improve the titration of isoflurane during general anesthesia.

The experience of complete neuromuscular blockade in awake humans

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To describe the subjective experience and the physiologic effects of endotracheal intubation and complete neuromuscular block in unsedated humans.

SETTING

Metropolitan V.A. Hospital.

PATIENTS

4 healthy, unsedated volunteers.

INTERVENTIONS

Subjects' tracheas were intubated using topical anesthesia, then subjects were completely paralyzed with vecuronium and mechanically ventilated at various end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PETCO2) levels, all without sedation.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Heart rate (HR), blood pressure, oxygen saturation by pulse oximeter (SpO2), and PETCO2 were measured. Subjects' verbatim descriptions of their experiences and answers to systematic questions were recorded after the experiments. All subjects reported that tracheal intubation was a very unpleasant experience. None of the subjects found paralysis itself to be distressing, and it did not affect mentation. Subjects felt breathless when PETCO2 was even slightly elevated. HR was increased by intubation, but not by paralysis. All subjects reported sore throat, muscle aches, fever, and fatigue lasting up to 24 hours after the experiment. One subject experienced nausea and vomiting. Another subject experienced a sore throat that persisted for weeks due to a vocal cord ulcer, which resolved spontaneously. All subjects' SpO2 levels after the experiment were below their pre-experiment baselines.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that paralysis of healthy, knowledgeable, and psychologically well-prepared subjects for experimental purposes is feasible but may result in unpleasant, self-limiting after effects. Further, we conclude that, in any case of awake paralysis, close attention should be paid to arterial PCO2, adequate sedation and analgesia, minimization of pain during procedures, psychological support, and maintenance of communication when possible.

Does anesthesia cause loss of consciousness?

Although about 30 million operations carried out under general anesthetic are routinely performed each year in the USA alone, it is not possible to determine reliably whether or not a given anesthetized patient is conscious during surgery. As a result, some patients may be either partially aware during the operation or may be able to recall some aspects of it afterwards. It is therefore crucial to develop some experimental means to evaluate the state of consciousness of the anesthetized patient. Recent developments suggest that 40 Hz neuronal oscillations might help to solve this problem.

New perspectives on anesthetic agents

The practices of anesthesiology are changing to meet the needs of an older and sicker patient population, to adapt to advances in medical technology and operating techniques, and to provide better postoperative conditions for patients and those caring for them. There is a large spectrum of anesthetics and a variety of anesthetic techniques that allow anesthetic onset and recovery to be rapid, vital functions to be maintained within normal limits, and operating conditions to be adapted to the needs of both patients and surgeons. Nevertheless, all anesthetic drugs and techniques have inherent risks as well as benefits, and despite expertise and caution in their use, a satisfactory outcome for the patient cannot be guaranteed.

Stimulus processing during apparent unconsciousness in anesthetized volunteers

Return of motor-responses upon request as an indicator of stimulus processing during apparent unconsciousness in general anesthesia was studied in 8 healthy, male volunteers during prolonged inhalation of nitrous oxide. First the minimal effective concentration of nitrous oxide was established for each volunteer, based upon continued absence of motor-responses to repeated verbal commands. One week later this concentration of nitrous oxide was administered for a 3-hr. period; return of motor-responses after at least 30 min. of absence was considered a sign of so-called unconscious perception. Four volunteers showed return of motor-response within the 3 hr. of exposure, but two of these had been rather restless throughout the session. Results indicate that unexpected processing of information by patients may occur during presumed unconsciousness after a prolonged inhalation of nitrous oxide in general anesthesia.

Lorazepam in open-heart surgery--plasma concentrations before, during and after bypass following different dose regimens

Thirty-six patients (29 males and 7 females) undergoing open-heart surgery received one of three different dose regimens of lorazepam. All received a weight-related oral dose (2 mg, 3 mg or 4 mg) pre-operatively for night sedation. Twenty-four patients had an additional weight-related dose (2 mg, 3 mg or 4 mg intravenously) either as part of the induction (12 patients) or just prior to connection of the heat-lung machine (12 patients). Plasma concentrations of lorazepam were measured 20 minutes after induction, immediately before bypass, 30 and 60 on bypass and 30 minutes after bypass. Only when additional intravenous lorazepam was given prior to connection to the heart-lung machine were plasma lorazepam concentrations obtained compatible with complete amnesia.

Etomidate infusion in thoracic anaesthesia

An etomidate infusion was used in the place of nitrous oxide during one lung anaesthesia for 40 patients undergoing thoracic surgery. Analgesia was provided by fentanyl. A mixture of oxygen and air was used to maintain arterial oxygen tension within normal limits despite one lung anaesthesia and enabled the use of nitrous oxide to be avoided in several patients who had lung cysts. Recovery was fairly rapid (mean (SEM) 11.5 (1.4) minutes). There was no incidence of awareness or dreams. This technique provides satisfactory anaesthesia and oxygenation during thoracic surgery when one lung only is being ventilated.

Total intravenous anaesthesia by an intermittent technique. Use of methohexitone, ketamine and a muscle relaxant

Good quality anaesthesia with smooth recovery can be induced by methohexitone 40 mg, ketamine 100 mg, diazepam 5 mg and alcuronium 15-20 mg and maintained with methohexitone 30 mg and ketamine 10 mg at 5-minute intervals and controlled ventilation with 30% oxygen in air. The technique is economical in running and capital costs and may have special implications for avoiding atmospheric pollution, for use in developing countries, and in emergency situations.