Treatment of intraoperative hypertension with enflurane, nicardipine, or human atrial natriuretic peptide: haemodynamic and renal effects

Interventions for protecting renal function in the perioperative period

BACKGROUND

Various methods have been used to try to protect kidney function in patients undergoing surgery. These most often include pharmacological interventions such as dopamine and its analogues, diuretics, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), sodium bicarbonate, antioxidants and erythropoietin (EPO).

OBJECTIVES

This review is aimed at determining the effectiveness of various measures advocated to protect patients' kidneys during the perioperative period.We considered the following questions: (1) Are any specific measures known to protect kidney function during the perioperative period? (2) Of measures used to protect the kidneys during the perioperative period, does any one method appear to be more effective than the others? (3) Of measures used to protect the kidneys during the perioperative period,does any one method appear to be safer than the others?

SEARCH METHODS

In this updated review, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2012), MEDLINE (Ovid SP) (1966 to August 2012) and EMBASE (Ovid SP) (1988 to August 2012). We originally handsearched six journals (Anesthesia and Analgesia, Anesthesiology, Annals of Surgery, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, and Journal of Vascular Surgery) (1985 to 2004). However, because these journals are properly indexed in MEDLINE, we decided to rely on electronic searches only without handsearching the journals from 2004 onwards.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected all randomized controlled trials in adults undergoing surgery for which a treatment measure was used for the purpose of providing renal protection during the perioperative period.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We selected 72 studies for inclusion in this review. Two review authors extracted data from all selected studies and entered them into RevMan 5.1; then the data were appropriately analysed. We performed subgroup analyses for type of intervention, type of surgical procedure and pre-existing renal dysfunction. We undertook sensitivity analyses for studies with high and moderately good methodological quality.

MAIN RESULTS

The updated review included data from 72 studies, comprising a total of 4378 participants. Of these, 2291 received some form of treatment and 2087 acted as controls. The interventions consisted most often of different pharmaceutical agents, such as dopamine and its analogues, diuretics, calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors, NAC, ANP, sodium bicarbonate, antioxidants and EPO or selected hydration fluids. Some clinical heterogeneity and varying risk of bias were noted amongst the studies, although we were able to meaningfully interpret the data. Results showed significant heterogeneity and indicated that most interventions provided no benefit.Data on perioperative mortality were reported in 41 studies and data on acute renal injury in 44 studies (all interventions combined). Because of considerable clinical heterogeneity (different clinical scenarios, as well as considerable methodological variability amongst the studies), we did not perform a meta-analysis on the combined data.Subgroup analysis of major interventions and surgical procedures showed no significant influence of interventions on reported mortality and acute renal injury. For the subgroup of participants who had pre-existing renal damage, the risk of mortality from 10 trials (959 participants) was estimated as odds ratio (OR) 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38 to 1.52; the risk of acute renal injury (as reported in the trials) was estimated from 11 trials (979 participants) as OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.80. Subgroup analysis of studies that were rated as having low risk of bias revealed that 19 studies reported mortality numbers (1604 participants); OR was 1.01, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.90. Fifteen studies reported data on acute renal injury (criteria chosen by the individual studies; 1600 participants); OR was 1.03, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.97.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No reliable evidence from the available literature suggests that interventions during surgery can protect the kidneys from damage. However, the criteria used to diagnose acute renal damage varied in many of the older studies selected for inclusion in this review, many of which suffered from poor methodological quality such as insufficient participant numbers and poor definitions of end points such as acute renal failure and acute renal injury. Recent methods of detecting renal damage such as the use of specific biomarkers and better defined criteria for identifying renal damage (RIFLE (risk, injury, failure, loss of kidney function and end-stage renal failure) or AKI (acute kidney injury)) may have to be explored further to determine any possible benefit derived from interventions used to protect the kidneys during the perioperative period.

Acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery: role of perioperative blood pressure control

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Patients who develop acute kidney injury (AKI) after cardiac surgery continue to have a high mortality rate. Although factors that predispose to postoperative renal dysfunction have been identified, this knowledge has not been associated with a substantial reduction in the incidence of this serious adverse event.

METHODS

This review uses the existing literature to explore the relationship between AKI and perioperative blood pressure (BP) control in cardiac surgery patients. The results of recent novel analyses are introduced, and the implications of these studies for the management of cardiac surgery patients in the perioperative period are discussed.

RESULTS

Preexisting isolated systolic hypertension and wide pulse pressure increase the risk of postoperative renal dysfunction in the cardiac surgery population. New data suggest that BP lability (i.e., BP excursions outside an acceptable physiologic range) during cardiac surgery may also be an important predictor of subsequent renal dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

Recently published data suggest that perioperative BP lability influences both the risk of postoperative renal dysfunction and 30-day mortality. Future studies will determine whether the use of agents that allow improved BP control within a desirable range will reduce the incidence of postoperative AKI in cardiac surgery patients.

Interventions for protecting renal function in the perioperative period

BACKGROUND

A number of methods have been used to try to protect kidney function in patients undergoing surgery. These include the administration of dopamine and its analogues, diuretics, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and hydration fluids.

OBJECTIVES

For this review, we selected randomized controlled trials which employed different methods to protect renal function during the perioperative period. In examining these trials, we looked at outcomes that included renal failure and mortality as well as changes in renal function tests, such as urine output, creatinine clearance, free water clearance, fractional excretion of sodium and renal plasma flow.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 2), MEDLINE (1966 to June, 2007), and EMBASE (1988 to June, 2007); and handsearched six journals (Anesthesia and Analgesia, Anesthesiology, Annals of Surgery, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, and Journal of Vascular Surgery).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected all randomized controlled trials in adults undergoing surgery where a treatment measure was used for the purpose of renal protection in the perioperative period.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We selected 53 studies for inclusion in this review. As well as data analysis from all the studies, we performed subgroup analysis for type of intervention, type of surgical procedure, and pre-existing renal dysfunction. We undertook sensitivity analysis on studies with high and moderately good methodological quality.

MAIN RESULTS

The review included data from 53 studies, comprising a total of 2327 participants. Of these, 1293 received some form of treatment and 1034 acted as controls. The interventions mostly consisted of different pharmaceutical agents, such as dopamine and its analogues, diuretics, calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors, or selected hydration fluids. The results indicated that certain interventions showed minimal benefits. All the results suffered from significant heterogeneity. Hence we cannot draw conclusions about the effectiveness of these interventions in protecting patients' kidneys during surgery.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no reliable evidence from the available literature to suggest that interventions during surgery can protect the kidneys from damage. There is a need for more studies with high methodological quality. One particular area for further study may be patients with pre-existing renal dysfunction undergoing surgery.

Intravenous Nicardipine

Nicardipine is a water soluble calcium channel antagonist, with predominantly vasodilatory actions. Intravenous (IV) nicardipine (Cardene IV), which demonstrates a relatively rapid onset/offset of action, is used in situations requiring the rapid control of blood pressure (BP). IV nicardipine was as effective as IV nitroprusside in the short-term reduction of BP in patients with severe or postoperative hypertension. A potential role for IV nicardipine in the intraoperative acute control of BP in patients undergoing various surgical procedures (including cardiovascular, neurovascular and abdominal surgery), and in the deliberate induction of reduced BP in surgical procedures in which haemostasis may be difficult (e.g. surgery involving the hip or spine) was demonstrated in preliminary studies. Preliminary studies also indicated the ability of a bolus dose of IV nicardipine to attenuate the hypertensive response, but not the increase in tachycardia, after laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in anaesthetised patients. In large, well designed studies, IV nicardipine prevented cerebral vasospasm in patients with recent aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage; however, overall clinical outcomes at 3 months were similar to those in patients who received standard management. Small preliminary studies have investigated the use of IV nicardipine in a variety of other settings, including acute intracerebral haemorrhage, acute ischaemic stroke, pre-eclampsia, acute aortic dissection, premature labour and electroconvulsive therapy.In conclusion, the efficacy of IV nicardipine in the short-term treatment of hypertension in settings for which oral therapy is not feasible or not desirable is well established. The ability to titrate IV nicardipine to the tolerance levels of individual patients makes this agent an attractive option, especially in critically ill patients or those undergoing surgery. Potential exists for further investigation of the use of this agent in clinical settings where a vasodilatory agent with minimal inotropic effects is appropriate.

Effects of atrial natriuretic peptide at a low dose on water and electrolyte metabolism during general anesthesia

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess the hemodynamic, renal, and endocrine effects of small continuous doses of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) in patients anesthetized with sevoflurane for gastrectomy.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized study.

SETTING

Operating room and wards of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

20 ASA physical status I and II patients scheduled for gastrectomy.

INTERVENTION

Atrial natriuretic peptide (0.05 microg/kg/min; ANP group, n = 10) or saline (control group, n = 10) was infused continuously for 2 hours beginning at the start of the operation.

MEASUREMENTS

Plasma concentrations of ANP, brain natriuretic peptide, cortisol, angiotensin II, and aldosterone; plasma renin activity; serum and urinary sodium, potassium, and chloride; and urinar output.

MAIN RESULTS

The ANP group showed much greater urine volume and sodium, potassium, and chloride excretion than the control group, although the ANP group had a lower arterial blood pressure. The infusion did not affect surgery-induced increases in hormones. No patients experienced excessive hypotension, bradycardia, or other perioperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous intravenous infusion of ANP at 0.05 microg/kg/min during gastrectomy was associated with greater water and electrolyte excretion unaccompanied by changes in potentially interacting hormones. Low-dose infusion may be particularly safe and useful for controlling water and electrolyte metabolism intraoperatively.

Brain natriuretic peptide: role in cardiovascular and volume homeostasis

The identification of natriuretic peptides as key regulators of natriuresis and vasodilatation, and the appreciation that their secretion is under the control of cardiac hemodynamic and neurohumoral factors, has caused wide interest. The natriuretic peptides are structurally similar, but genetically distinct peptides that have diverse actions on cardiovascular, renal, and endocrine homeostasis. Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) are of myocardial cell origin, while cardiac natriuretic peptide (CNP) is of endothelial origin. ANP and BNP bind to the natriuretic peptide receptor (NPR-A) which, via 3' 5'-cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP), mediates natriuresis, vasodialation, renin inhibition, and antimitogenic properties. CNP lacks natriuretic action but possesses vasodilating and growth inhibiting effects via the guanyl cyclase linked natriuretic peptide-B (NPR-B) receptor. All three peptides are cleared by natriuretic peptide-C receptor (NPR-C) and degraded by neutral endopeptidase, both of which are widely expressed in kidney, lung, and vascular wall. Recently, a fourth member of the natriuretic peptide, dendroaspsis natriuretic peptide (DNP) has been reported to be present in human plasma and atrial myocardium.

Cardiac natriuretic peptides--hope or hype?

In recent years, biomedical science has witnessed the emergence of peptide biochemicals as significant topics of research. Some of these peptides are of little potential clinical use, while others, of which cardiac natriuretic peptides are an example, appear to be promising. This particular group of peptides (i.e. ANP, BNP and CNP) shows promising diagnostic as well as therapeutic potential for various pathological conditions. In the case of acute myocardial infarction, these peptides have significant diagnostic and predictive properties, more so than other biochemicals such as adrenaline, renin and aldosterone. In addition, ANP is found to have significant benefits over the classical anti-anginal drug glyceryl trinitrate. However, as is the case with other peptides, applying these benefits clinically may not be easy because of the structure of the compounds, but various strategies are now being applied to solve this problem. These include the use of non-peptide receptor ligands, inhibitors of ANP metabolism, gene therapy and so on. The development of drugs in clinical practice, which exploits the natriuretic peptides system therefore seems to be promising, and this article reviews advances in our understanding of these compounds.

Effects of nicardipine and labetalol on the acute hemodynamic response to electroconvulsive therapy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To examine the acute hemodynamic effects of intravenous (i.v.) nicardipine and its ability to attenuate the hyperdynamic response to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), when used alone or in combination with labetalol.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double-blind, positive-control, clinical investigation.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENTS

36 patients undergoing ECT.

INTERVENTIONS

In a series of three studies, the hemodynamic effects of nicardipine were assessed prior to, during, and after ECT. After administration of glycopyrrolate 0.1 mg i.v., placebo (saline) or nicardipine was administered by rapid infusion (1, 2.5, 5, 10, and 15 mg) or bolus injection (1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg), either alone or in combination with labetalol 10 mg i.v. Unconsciousness was induced with methohexital 1 mg/kg i.v.; succinylcholine 1.2 to 1.5 mg/kg i.v. was administered for muscle relaxation. A bilateral electrical stimulus was delivered and the durations of motor and electroencephalographic (EEG) seizures were noted.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) values were recorded at 1- to 5-minute intervals throughout the study period. When administered as a rapid infusion, nicardipine 5 mg i.v. produced a significant decrease in MAP; however, nicardipine dosages of 10 to 15 mg i.v. did not produce a significantly greater decrease in MAP than 5 mg. Bolus administration of nicardipine 1.25 to 5 mg produced a rapid onset of its hemodynamic effects without exacerbating the cardiovascular depressant effects of methohexital. However, the decrease in MAP was accompanied by an increase in HR after administration of the 5 mg i.v. bolus dose. The acute hyperdynamic response to ECT was most effectively controlled by nicardipine 2.5 to 5 mg i.v. bolus, in combination with labetalol 10 mg i.v. Seizure duration was not significantly altered by the use of nicardipine as part of the anesthetic regimen for ECT.

CONCLUSION

Nicardipine 2.5 mg i.v. bolus in combination with labetalol 10 mg i.v. was the most effective pretreatment regimen for preventing the acute hyperdynamic response to ECT. However, this combination produced a 20% decrease in MAP immediately prior to ECT and a lower MAP at the time of discharge.

The effects of atrial natriuretic peptide infusion on hemodynamic, renal, and hormonal responses during gastrectomy

Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) antagonizes the reninangiotensin-aldosterone, adrenocorticotropic hormone-cortisol, vasopressin, and endothelin systems. Surgical injury stimulates these systems and causes vasoconstriction and antidiuresis. We assessed the hemodynamic, renal, and endocrine effects of continuous intravenous infusion of ANP in patients anesthetized with sevoflurane undergoing gastrectomy. ANP (0.1 microgram.kg-1.min-1; ANP group, n = 9) or saline (control group, n = 9) was infused continuously for 3 h from the start of the operation. The ANP group showed much higher urinary volume and sodium, potassium, and chloride excretion than the control group, although the former had lower arterial blood pressure. ANP infusion slightly inhibited aldosterone secretion and initially tended to inhibit renin secretion stimulated by surgery, but it did not affect surgery-induced increases in the plasma concentrations of vasopressin, adrenocorticotropic hormone, cortisol, or endothelin. Two patients in the ANP group experienced excessive hypotension, one experienced bradycardia, and two experienced mild hypoxemia, which required treatment but were resolved easily. These findings suggest that ANP infusion may be used with caution for controlling renal function and arterial blood pressure during surgery.

IMPLICATIONS

Continuous intravenous infusion of atrial natriuretic peptide, 0.1 microgram.kg-1.min-1, during gastrectomy was associated with higher water and sodium excretion and lower arterial blood pressure. It tended to inhibit the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system compared with saline infusion, which suggests that atrial natriuretic peptide may be useful for intraoperative circulation control.

Nicardipine: applications in anesthesia practice

Nicardipine is the first intravenously administered dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker. Its primary physiologic actions include vasodilatation with limited effects on the inotropic and dromotropic function of the myocardium. Nicardipine has been used to control blood pressure intraoperatively in response to tracheal intubation and in the postoperative period. Various patient populations have been included such as major vascular and cardiovascular surgery. It has also been used as an agent for controlled hypotension. Preliminary experience suggests that nicardipine provides safe and effective control of perioperative blood pressure. The basic pharmacology and physiology of the most recently released calcium channel antagonist, nicardipine, is reviewed, and its applications in clinical anesthesia and interaction with other anesthetic drugs are discussed.