AspirinWorks: a new immunologic diagnostic test for monitoring aspirin effect

Reference interval establishment and correlation research of urine thromboxane metabolites: Unveiling new possibilities in platelet activation

BACKGROUND

Thromboxane metabolites could indirectly reflect platelet activation, among which 11-dehydro-thromboxane B2 (11dhTxB2) and 11-dehydro-2, 3-dinor thromboxane B2 (11dh23dinorTxB2) are two stable metabolites that are abundant in urine, and both are closely related to disease progression and drug use. However, most clinical application studies have focused on the single indicator of 11dhTxB2. We propose an LC-MS/MS method suitable for routine clinical screening with simultaneous determination of both metabolites and conduct preliminary studies in different populations.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The thromboxane metabolites were extracted by liquid-liquid extraction and determined by LC-MS/MS. Reference intervals (RI) were established in 333 healthy adults and validated in 25 patients with coronary atherosclerosis (CA). This LC-MS/MS method was over a wide quantitative range (0.1-10 μmol/L), the imprecision and accuracy were 5.2 %-11 % and 89.3 %-106.5 %, and was suitable for clinical routine quantitative screening. The 95th percentile RI of unire 11dhTxB2 was 1220 (95 % CI: 1048, 1376) pg mg Cr -1, for 11dh23dinorTxB2, RI was 908 (95 % CI: 821, 1102) pg mg Cr -1. For the first time, we found a significant correlation between 11dhTxB2 and 11dh23dinorTxB2 in both healthy adults (r = 0.67, P < 0.001) and CA patients (r = 0.77, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The establishment of RI provides a reference for diseases related to platelet activation and the use of drugs, and the first discovery of the correlation between 11dhTxB2 and 11dh23dinorTxB2 in urine provides a new possibilitie for the diagnostic and prognostic of cardiovascular diseases.

Adjustment for Renal Function Improves the Prognostic Performance of Urinary Thromboxane Metabolites

BACKGROUND

Systemic thromboxane A2 generation, assessed by quantifying the concentration of stable thromboxane B2 metabolites (TXB2-M) in the urine adjusted for urinary creatinine, is strongly associated with mortality risk. We sought to define optimal TXB2-M cutpoints for aspirin users and nonusers and determine if adjusting TXB2-M for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in addition to urinary creatinine improved mortality risk assessment.

METHODS

Urinary TXB2-M were measured by competitive ELISA in 1363 aspirin users and 1681 nonusers participating in the Framingham Heart Study. Cutpoints were determined for TXB2-M and TXB2-M/eGFR using log-rank statistics and used to assess mortality risk by Cox proportional hazard modeling and restricted mean survival time. Multivariable models were compared using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). A cohort of 105 aspirin users with heart failure was used for external validation.

RESULTS

Optimized cutpoints of TXB2-M were 1291 and 5609 pg/mg creatinine and of TXB2-M/eGFR were 16.6 and 62.1 filtered prostanoid units (defined as pg·min/creatinine·mL·1.73 m2), for aspirin users and nonusers, respectively. TXB2-M/eGFR cutpoints provided more robust all-cause mortality risk discrimination than TXB2-M cutpoints, with a larger unadjusted hazard ratio (2.88 vs 2.16, AIC P < 0.0001) and greater differences in restricted mean survival time between exposure groups (1.46 vs 1.10 years), findings that were confirmed in the external validation cohort of aspirin users. TXB2-M/eGFR cutpoints also provided better cardiovascular/stroke mortality risk discrimination than TXB2-M cutpoints (unadjusted hazard ratio 3.31 vs 2.13, AIC P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Adjustment for eGFR strengthens the association of urinary TXB2-M with long-term mortality risk irrespective of aspirin use.

Effect of assay specificity on the association of urine 11-dehydro thromboxane B2 determination with cardiovascular risk

BACKGROUND

Elevated urine 11-dehydro TXB(2), an indicator of persistent thromboxane generation in aspirin-treated patients, correlates with adverse cardiovascular outcome and has recently been identified as an independent risk factor for vein graft thrombosis after cardiac bypass surgery in the Reduction in Graft Occlusion Rates (RIGOR) study. The polyclonal antibody-based ELISA used to measure 11-dehydro TXB(2) in these previous studies is no longer clinically available and has been supplanted by a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared second-generation monoclonal antibody-based ELISA.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the laboratory and clinical performance of the first- and second-generation assays in a well-defined study population.

METHODS

11-dehydro TXB(2) was quantified in 451 urine samples from 229 Reduction in Graft Occlusion Rates (RIGOR) subjects using both ELISA. Ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) and spiking studies were used to investigate discordant assay results. The association of 11-dehydro TXB(2) to clinical outcome was assessed for each assay using multivariate modeling.

RESULTS

Median 11-dehydro TXB(2) levels were higher by monoclonal antibody- compared with polyclonal antibody-based ELISA (856 vs. 399 pg mg(-1) creatinine, P < 0.000001), with the latter providing values similar to UPLC-MS/MS. This discrepancy was predominantly as a result of cross-reactivity of the monoclonal antibody with 11-dehydro-2,3-dinor TXB(2), a thromboxane metabolite present in a similar concentration but with a poor direct correlation with 11-dehydro TXB(2). In contrast to the first-generation ELISA, 11-dehydro TXB(2) measured by the monoclonal antibody-based ELISA failed to associate with the risk of vein graft occlusion.

CONCLUSION

Quantification of urine 11-dehydro TXB(2) by monoclonal antibody-based ELISA was confounded by interference from 11-dehydro-2,3-dinor TXB(2) which reduced the accuracy and clinical utility of this second-generation assay.

Antiplatelet therapy: aspirin resistance and all that jazz!

Platelets play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, thrombosis, and stroke. Aspirin used alone or in combination with other antiplatelet drugs has been shown to offer significant benefit to patients at high risk of vascular events. Resistance to the action of aspirin may decrease this benefit. Aspirin resistance has been defined by clinical and/or laboratory criteria; however, detection by laboratory methods prior to experiencing a clinical event will likely provide the greatest opportunity for intervention. Numerous laboratory methods with different cutoff points have been used to evaluate the resistance. Noncompliance with aspirin treatment has also confounded studies. A single assay is currently insufficient to establish resistance. Combinations of results to confirm compliance and platelet inhibition may identify "at-risk" individuals who truly have aspirin resistance. The most effective strategy for managing patients with aspirin resistance is unknown; however, studies are currently underway to address this issue.

Aspirin prophylaxis for the prevention of thrombosis: expectations and limitations

Platelets play a very important role in the pathogenesis of acute vascular events leading to thrombosis of the coronary and cerebral arteries. Blockage of these arteries leading to regional ischemia of heart and brain tissues precipitate heart attacks and stroke. Acetyl salicylic acid (Aspirin) has been the drug of choice for over half a century for the primary and secondary prophylaxis of thrombotic events. In spite of its extensive use as an antiplatelet drug for the prevention of vascular thrombosis, there is considerable concern about the degree of protection it offers, to patients under aspirin therapy. In this paper, we explain the phenomenon of aspirin resistance, discuss the limitations of aspirin therapy, and suggest methods to monitor "at-risk" individuals. Ability to monitor and determine at risk patients will provide opportunities for the clinicians to customize antiplatelet therapies.

Plateletworks: a novel point of care platelet function screen

Platelet function is critically important in the acute-care settings of cardiopulmonary bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention, which are commonly associated with the adverse vascular events of hemorrhage and thrombosis, respectively. To improve outcomes, it has been suggested that patients should be screened for platelet count and function periprocedurally, and therapeutic intervention including the possible use of thrombolytics and adequate anticoagulation or administration of antiplatelet agents, should be utilized. Antiplatelet therapy including aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), the thienopyridines (clopidopgrel), and parenteral anti-glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa agents (abciximab, tirofiban, and eptifibatide) are recognized as clinically important in patients at risk of developing thrombotic events. Recently, it has been recognized that empiric therapeutic administration of these agents may be suboptimal in clinical environments because of interpatient variability with regard to platelet count, platelet response, receptor concentration on the platelet, and other factors. Hence there is a clinical need to monitor such therapies on an individual basis. Traditional platelet tests including light transmission aggregometry (LTA) are inconvenient for acute diagnostic testing because of the complexity of the test and the requirement for specialty training. Hence, 'near-patient' test systems have recently been introduced. Plateletworks is an in vitro diagnostic, point-of-care test platform that has demonstrated utility in monitoring platelet response to all current antiplatelet agents including aspirin and clopidogrel.