Innovative Diagnostic Technologies and Their Significance for Personalized Medicine

The Progress in Bioprinting and Its Potential Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life

The intensive development of technologies related to human health in recent years has caused a real revolution. The transition from conventional medicine to personalized medicine, largely driven by bioprinting, is expected to have a significant positive impact on a patient's quality of life. This article aims to conduct a systematic review of bioprinting's potential impact on health-related quality of life. A literature search was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was undertaken using the PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect databases between 2019 and 2023. We have identified some of the most significant potential benefits of bioprinting to improve the patient's quality of life: personalized part production; saving millions of lives; reducing rejection risks after transplantation; accelerating the process of skin tissue regeneration; homocellular tissue model generation; precise fabrication process with accurate specifications; and eliminating the need for organs donor, and thus reducing patient waiting time. In addition, these advances in bioprinting have the potential to greatly benefit cancer treatment and other research, offering medical solutions tailored to each individual patient that could increase the patient's chance of survival and significantly improve their overall well-being. Although some of these advancements are still in the research stage, the encouraging results from scientific studies suggest that they are on the verge of being integrated into personalized patient treatment. The progress in bioprinting has the power to revolutionize medicine and healthcare, promising to have a profound impact on improving the quality of life and potentially transforming the field of medicine and healthcare.

Smart Nanoparticles for Chemo-Based Combinational Therapy

Cancer is a heterogeneous and complex disease. Traditional cancer therapy is associated with low therapeutic index, acquired resistance, and various adverse effects. With the increasing understanding of cancer biology and technology advancements, more strategies have been exploited to optimize the therapeutic outcomes. The rapid development and application of nanomedicine have motivated this progress. Combinational regimen, for instance, has become an indispensable approach for effective cancer treatment, including the combination of chemotherapeutic agents, chemo-energy, chemo-gene, chemo-small molecules, and chemo-immunology. Additionally, smart nanoplatforms that respond to external stimuli (such as light, temperature, ultrasound, and magnetic field), and/or to internal stimuli (such as changes in pH, enzymes, hypoxia, and redox) have been extensively investigated to improve precision therapy. Smart nanoplatforms for combinational therapy have demonstrated the potential to be the next generation cancer treatment regimen. This review aims to highlight the recent advances in smart combinational therapy.

Development of CYP21A2 Genotyping Assay for the Diagnosis of Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia

BACKGROUND

Steroid 21-hydroxylase deficiency due to CYP21A2 gene mutations represents more than 90% of all congenital adrenal hyperplasia cases. This deficiency is screened by measuring levels of 17-hydroxyprogesterone, which may vary, causing false positive or false negative results. In order to assist the diagnosis, molecular methodologies have been employed. This work aimed to perform genotyping assays to detect mutations in the CYP21A2 gene and compare the findings with other population studies.

METHODS

The SNaPshot assay was developed to simultaneously detect 12 frequent point mutations in the CYP21A2 gene (p.Arg409Cys, p.Gln319Ter, p.Arg357Trp, p.Leu308PhefsTer6, p.Val237Glu, IVS2-13A/C > G, p.Ile173Asn, p.Pro31Leu, p.Pro454Ser, p.Val282Leu, p.Gly111ValfsTer21 and p.His63Leu). The direct sequencing and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification assays were used to confirm point mutations present in the developed method. The latter was also used to search large deletions and gene conversion, complementing the investigation. A total of 166 cases were studied.

RESULTS

The SNaPshot assay was successfully developed to detect the 12 mutations. The results of mutation analysis indicated 84 pathogenic alleles in 48 cases, with p.Val282Leu (27.1%) and IVS2-13A/C > G (20.8%) being the most frequently found mutations. Between the findings of this study and those of other South American studies, there were significant differences in frequency for p.Pro31Leu and p.Val282Leu (p < 0.001). A new variant T in IVS2-13A/C > G was identified in two patients via the SNaPshot assay.

CONCLUSION

The molecular strategy developed for CYP21A2 gene mutation screening allowed us to detect the principle mutations described around the world. Furthermore, the first Southern Brazilian mutation frequencies concerning the CYP21A2 gene were obtained.

Enabling personalized cancer medicine decisions: The challenging pharmacological approach of PBPK models for nanomedicine and pharmacogenomics (Review)

The existing tumor heterogeneity and the complexity of cancer cell biology critically demand powerful translational tools with which to support interdisciplinary efforts aiming to advance personalized cancer medicine decisions in drug development and clinical practice. The development of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models to predict the effects of drugs in the body facilitates the clinical translation of genomic knowledge and the implementation of in vivo pharmacology experience with pharmacogenomics. Such a direction unequivocally empowers our capacity to also make personalized drug dosage scheme decisions for drugs, including molecularly targeted agents and innovative nanoformulations, i.e. in establishing pharmacotyping in prescription. In this way, the applicability of PBPK models to guide individualized cancer therapeutic decisions of broad clinical utility in nanomedicine in real-time and in a cost-affordable manner will be discussed. The latter will be presented by emphasizing the need for combined efforts within the scientific borderlines of genomics with nanotechnology to ensure major benefits and productivity for nanomedicine and personalized medicine interventions.

Systematic review of pharmacoeconomic studies of pharmacogenomic tests

There is currently a lack of consensus on the components that should be included in the pharmacoeconomic evaluation of pharmacogenomic tests. We conducted a systematic review focusing on pharmacogenomic tests to identify and comment on key parameters. The articles selected as economic analyses were classified using a framework including components related to testing, model, health outcomes, costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. We found 15 studies that met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. A high degree of heterogeneity between evaluations was observed even within studies evaluating the same pharmacogenomic test. Components specific to pharmacogenomic tests were identified as marker prevalence, population ethnicity, pharmacogenomic treatment effect and cost of genomic data collection and analysis. In order to fully assess all aspects of pharmacogenomic testing, future pharmacoeconomic assessments should include every specific component that has an impact on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

Nanomedicine and personalized medicine toward the application of pharmacotyping in clinical practice to improve drug-delivery outcomes

Recent technological advances in nanomedicine and nanotechnology in parallel with knowledge accumulated from the clinical translation of disease- and drug-related genomic data have created fertile ground for personalized medicine to emerge as the new direction in diagnosis and drug therapy. To this end, the development of sophisticated nano-based systems for targeted drug delivery, along with the advent of pharmacogenomics, moves the drug-prescription process toward pharmacotyping, e.g., the individualized adjustment of drug selection and dosage. However, the clinical validity and utility of pharmacogenomic testing must be demonstrated by cost-effectiveness analysis and establishment of clinical-practice reimbursement codes. Within this framework, and to achieve major benefits for all patients worldwide, a multidisciplinary scientific and technological infrastructure has to be organized in the healthcare system to address better the issues affecting regulatory environment, clinical pharmacology guidelines, education, bioethics and genomics data dissemination.

FROM THE CLINICAL EDITOR

Individualized pharmacotyping, patient and disease-specific delivery of drugs, combining nanotechnology and pharmagenomics-based approaches would result in much more specific and efficient treatment of a variety of illnesses. While this clearly is one of the main cornerstones of individualized medicine; the cost effective integration of this complex technology is far from trivial, as discussed in details in this opinion paper.