Comparison of epicardial and myocardial perfusions after primary coronary angioplasty for ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients under and over 75 years of age

Inflammation-based Glasgow Prognostic Score in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A prospective cohort study

The inflammation-based Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), which involves C-reactive protein and serum albumin levels, has been reported to be a strong independent predictor of mortality in many cancers. This study aimed to investigate whether the GPS is associated with mortality in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI).In this study, 406 consecutive patients with STEMI at our emergency department (ED) who were undergoing pPCI were prospectively enrolled and assigned a GPS of 0, 1, or 2. Kaplan-Meier survival and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the associations between the GPS and long-term mortality.Twenty-three patients (5.7%) died at the hospital, and 37 (9.7%) died during follow-up (14.4 [9.3-17.6] months). Compared with patients with a lower GPS, those with a higher GPS had significantly higher in-hospital mortality (GPS = 0 vs GPS = 1 vs GPS = 2: 3.3% vs 6.3% vs 28.0%, P < .001), follow-up mortality (4.6% vs 14.3% vs 55.6%, P < .001), and cumulative mortality (9.6% vs 21.1% vs 71.1%, P < .001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that in patients with a GPS of 1 and 2 (versus 0), the multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for all-cause mortality were 2.068 (95% CI: 1.082-3.951, P = .028) and 8.305 (95% CI: 4.017-17.171, P < .001), respectively, after controlling for all of the confounding factors. Subgroup analysis showed that a higher GPS was associated with an increased risk of cumulative mortality in the different subgroups.The GPS on admission may be useful for stratifying the risk of adverse outcomes in patients with STEMI undergoing pPCI in the ED.

Effect of intra-coronary administration of tirofiban through aspiration catheter on patients over 60 years with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of 2 approaches for intra-coronary administration of tirofiban (aspiration catheter versus guiding catheter) in patients over 60 years of age undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). It has been suggested that the administration of tirofiban by intra-coronary injection could promote drug absorption in the diseased region and enhance the inhibition of platelet aggregation, decreasing bleeding rates, but little is known about the comparative efficiency and safety of using guiding catheter versus aspiration catheter for delivery.Eighty-nine patients over 60 years of age with STEMI undergoing PCI were randomly divided into 2 groups according to the injection route for intracoronary administration of tirofiban [guiding catheter (n = 41) and aspiration catheter (n = 48)]. Baseline features, epicardial and myocardial perfusion, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), and bleeding rate were compared.No differences in age, gender, and history of hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, and so on were observed (P > .05). The patients in the aspiration catheter group generally had a higher incidence of cerebral vascular disease. Compared with those in the guiding catheter group, patients in the aspiration catheter group obtained more favorable myocardial perfusion (P < .05). In-hospital and at 3-month and 6-month follow-ups, the MACCE rate and frequency of bleeding events were similar between the 2 groups (P > .05).Intra-coronary delivery of tirofiban through aspiration catheter led to better myocardial perfusion in STEMI patients over 60 years of age undergoing PCI compared with intra-coronary injection of tirofiban through guiding catheter. The 2 delivery routes were associated with similar rates of MACCEs and bleeding events.

A Novel Method in the Stratification of Post-Myocardial-Infarction Patients Based on Pathophysiology

OBJECTIVES

We proposed that the severity of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) could be classified based on pathophysiological changes.

METHODS

First-STEMI patients were classified within hospitalization. Grade 0: no detectable myocardial necrosis; Grade 1: myocardial necrosis without functional and morphological abnormalities; Grade 2: myocardial necrosis with reduced LVEF; Grade 3: reduced LVEF on the basis of cardiac remodeling; Grade 4: mitral regurgitation additional to the Grade-3 criteria.

RESULTS

Of 180 patients, 1.7, 43.9, 26.1, 23.9 and 4.4% patients were classified as Grade 0 to 4, respectively. The classification is an independent predicator of 90-day MACEs (any death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, acute heart failure and stroke): the rate was 0, 5.1, 8.5, 48.8 and 75% from Grade 0 to 4 (p < 0.001), respectively. The Grade-2 patients were more likely to have recovered left ventricular ejection fraction than the Grade-3/4 patients did after 90 days (48.9% vs. 19.1%, p < 0.001). Avoiding complicated quantification, the classification served as a good reflection of infarction size as measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (0 ± 0, 15.68 ± 8.48, 23.68 ± 9.32, 36.12 ± 11.35 and 40.66 ± 14.33% of the left ventricular mass by Grade 0 to 4, P < 0.001), and with a comparable prognostic value (AUC 0.819 vs. 0.813 for infarction size, p = 0.876 by C-statistics) for MACEs.

CONCLUSIONS

The new classification represents an easy and objective method to scale the cardiac detriments for STEMI patients.