Effects of somatostatin on insulin and glucagon in patients with insulinoma

Somatostatin analogues for the treatment of hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia

Hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia (HH) is a biochemical finding of low blood glucose levels due to the dysregulation of insulin secretion from pancreatic β-cells. Under normal physiological conditions, glucose metabolism is coupled to β-cell insulin secretion so that blood glucose levels are maintained within the physiological range of 3.5-5.5 mmol/L. However, in HH this coupling of glucose metabolism to insulin secretion is perturbed so that insulin secretion becomes unregulated. HH typically occurs in the neonatal, infancy and childhood periods and can be due to many different causes. Adults can also present with HH but the causes in adults tend to be different. Somatostatin (SST) is a peptide hormone that is released by the delta cells (δ-cells) in the pancreas. It binds to G protein-coupled SST receptors to regulate a variety of location-specific and selective functions such as hormone inhibition, neurotransmission and cell proliferation. SST plays a potent role in the regulation of both insulin and glucagon secretion in response to changes in glucose levels by negative feedback mechanism. The half-life of SST is only 1-3 min due to quick degradation by peptidases in plasma and tissues. Thus, a direct continuous intravenous or subcutaneous infusion is required to achieve the therapeutic effect. These limitations prompted the discovery of SST analogues such as octreotide and lanreotide, which have longer half-lives and therefore can be administered as injections. SST analogues are used to treat different forms of HH in children and adults and therapeutic effect is achieved by suppressing insulin secretion from pancreatic β-cells by complex mechanisms. These treatments are associated with several side effects, especially in the newborn period, with necrotizing enterocolitis being the most serious side effect and hence SS analogues should be used with extreme caution in this age group.

Evaluation of a euglycaemic clamp procedure as a diagnostic test in insulinoma patients

In 15 patients with insulinoma, six patients after successful removal of this tumour, two patients with previous pancreas resection because of hypoglycaemia elsewhere, and 10 control subjects, the diagnostic usefulness of euglycaemic clamp procedures (without exogenous insulin) was assessed in comparison with prolonged starvation. Only insulinoma patients developed sustained hypoglycaemia (less than or equal to 2.3 mmol l-1) within 2-44 h without caloric intake, because of inappropriately elevated immunoreactive insulin (IR-insulin) concentrations. IR-proinsulin values were elevated in most (7 out of 10), but not in all insulinoma patients. The steady-state glucose infusion rate necessary to maintain a stable plasma glucose concentration of 4.4-5.0 mmol l-1 was significantly (P less than or equal to 0.001) higher in insulinoma patients (2.5 +/- 0.6 mg kg-1 min-1) than in pancreas resected patients (0.6 +/- 0.2 mg kg-1 min-1), or in control subjects (0.5 +/- 0.1 mg kg-1 min-1). Due to a considerable degree of overlap, sensitivity (0.44) and specificity (0.95) were too low for such a procedure to qualify as a diagnostic test. There was no correlation of glucose infusion rates to IR-insulin values (r = 0.024, P = 0.461). One reason for this was the development of insulin resistance in some, but not in all insulinoma patients. When, in analogy to insulin/glucose ratios, a diagnostic index was derived by multiplying the steady state glucose infusion rate by the steady state IR-insulin concentration, the diagnostic accuracy was greatly increased (sensitivity and specificity 0.94, respectively), but still lower than that of 'amended' insulin/glucose ratios in fasting plasma or at the time of discontinuation of prolonged fasts (1.00). Somatostatin infusions inhibited insulin secretion (IR-C-peptide plasma concentrations) by 52-88% in subjects without insulinoma and in those insulinoma patients whose tumour cells ultrastructurally contained plenty of normal secretory granules, and to a lesser degree when only abnormal or virtually no secretory granules were present, i.e. in more de-differentiated tumours. In contrast to this significant (P = 0.036) association, malignancy, i.e. the presence of metastases, could not be predicted from whether or not insulin secretion was resistant to the inhibitory action of somatostatin. In conclusion, euglycaemic clamp experiments are less reliable for detecting or excluding a functioning insulinoma than the relation of glucose and insulin values during starvation. The inhibition of insulin secretion by somatostatin depends on the presence of normal beta-granules, and does not distinguish adenomas from carcinomas.