1
|
Madden GJ, Mahmoudi S, Brown K. Pavlovian learning and conditioned reinforcement. J Appl Behav Anal 2023; 56:498-519. [PMID: 37254881 PMCID: PMC10364091 DOI: 10.1002/jaba.1004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Conditioned reinforcers are widely used in applied behavior analysis. Basic research evidence reveals that Pavlovian learning plays an important role in the acquisition and efficacy of new conditioned-reinforcer functions. Thus, a better understanding of Pavlovian principles holds the promise of improving the efficacy of conditioned reinforcement in applied research and practice. This paper surveys how (and if) Pavlovian principles are presented in behavior-analytic textbooks; imprecisions and knowledge gaps within contemporary Pavlovian empirical findings are highlighted. Thereafter, six practical principles of Pavlovian conditioning are presented along with empirical support and knowledge gaps that should be filled by applied and translational behavior-analytic researchers. Innovative applications of these principles are outlined for research in language acquisition, token reinforcement, and self-control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Saba Mahmoudi
- Department of Psychology, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA
| | - Katherine Brown
- Department of Psychology, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chance S, Cividini-Motta C, Livingston C. Assessing the Effects of Observational Conditioning and Response-Contingent Pairing on the Vocalizations of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder. Anal Verbal Behav 2021; 37:194-216. [PMID: 35141106 PMCID: PMC8789963 DOI: 10.1007/s40616-021-00157-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often display impairments in communication, such as limited echoic behavior, few vocal-verbal responses, and a lack of functional communication. One potential way to foster the acquisition of vocal responses in individuals with disabilities is by conditioning vocalizations as reinforcers. Conditioning procedures include stimulus-stimulus pairing, response-contingent pairing (RCP), operant discrimination training, and observational conditioning (OC). However, previous research has not evaluated whether OC can be used to condition vocalizations as reinforcers. The current study assessed whether two conditioning procedures, RCP and OC, were effective in conditioning vocalizations as a reinforcer and also evaluated their effect on the rate of vocalizations. Participants included three children with ASD, ages 5-10 years old. During the conditioning phase, rates of vocalizations during the RCP and OC conditions and a control condition were compared within an adapted alternating-treatments design. Reinforcer assessments were completed in a multielement design, pre- and postconditioning, to assess whether the target vocalizations acquired reinforcing properties. A conditioning effect and an increase in the rate of vocalizations were observed for two of the three participants; however, the conditioning effect was minor for one participant. Overall, the results of this study indicate both the RCP and OC procedures may be beneficial in increasing vocalizations for some children and could be incorporated into clinical programs and further explored in future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sydni Chance
- Department of Child and Family Studies, University of South Florida, MHC2333, 13301 Bruce B. Downs Blvd, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
| | - Catia Cividini-Motta
- Department of Child and Family Studies, University of South Florida, MHC2333, 13301 Bruce B. Downs Blvd, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
| | - Cynthia Livingston
- Department of Child and Family Studies, University of South Florida, MHC2333, 13301 Bruce B. Downs Blvd, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
- University Of Nebraska Medical Center’s Munroe-Meyer Institute, Omaha, NE USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Palmer DC. Finding Jack Michael’s Footprints in the Sand. Anal Verbal Behav 2021; 37:251-255. [DOI: 10.1007/s40616-021-00156-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
4
|
da Silva SP, Williams AM. Translations in Stimulus-Stimulus Pairing: Autoshaping of Learner Vocalizations. Perspect Behav Sci 2020; 43:57-103. [PMID: 32440645 PMCID: PMC7198677 DOI: 10.1007/s40614-019-00228-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Stimulus-stimulus pairing (SSP) is a procedure used by behavior analysis practitioners that capitalizes on respondent conditioning processes to elicit vocalizations. These procedures usually are implemented only after other, more customary methods (e.g., standard echoic training via modeling) have been exhausted. Unfortunately, SSP itself has mixed research support, probably because certain as-yet-unidentified procedural variations are more effective than others. Even when SSP produces (or increases) vocalizations, its effects can be short-lived. Although specific features of SSP differ across published accounts, fundamental characteristics include presentation of a vocal stimulus proximal with presentation of a preferred item. In the present article, we draw parallels between SSP procedures and autoshaping, review factors shown to affect autoshaping, and interpret autoshaping research for suggested SSP tests and applications. We then call for extended use and reporting of SSP in behavior-analytic treatments. Finally, three bridges created by this article are identified: basic-applied, respondent-operant, and behavior analysis with other sciences.
Collapse
|
5
|
Costa MRC, Souza CBAD. Aquisição de intraverbais em crianças com autismo: efeitos do pareamento de estímulos e respostas ecoicas. PSICOLOGIA USP 2020. [DOI: 10.1590/0103-6564e190061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Resumo O ensino de intraverbais para indivíduos com autismo tem sido realizado, principalmente, através de procedimentos que envolvem reforçamento diferencial. Recentemente, o procedimento de observação de pareamento de estímulos (SPOP) surgiu enquanto alternativa para verificar a emergência de repertórios verbais. O SPOP implica o pareamento de estímulos sem exigir outra resposta que a observação do pareamento. O ecoico tem sido apontado como facilitador na emergência de operantes verbais. O presente estudo comparou, com um delineamento de sondas múltiplas concorrentes com tratamento alternado adaptado, a eficácia do SPOP com um procedimento de apresentação contígua de estímulos com requisição de resposta ecoica na emergência de intraverbais em três crianças com autismo. Observou-se a eficácia do SPOP na indução de intraverbais e verificou-se o papel facilitador do ecoico. Discutem-se possíveis efeitos de interferência dos tratamentos, da extinção de respostas no contexto experimental e da utilização de reforçadores condicionados como parte do SPOP.
Collapse
|
6
|
Vandbakk M, Olaff HS, Holth P. Conditioned Reinforcement: the Effectiveness of Stimulus—Stimulus Pairing and Operant Discrimination Procedures. PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s40732-018-0318-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
7
|
Lepper TL, Petursdottir AI. Effects of response-contingent stimulus pairing on vocalizations of nonverbal children with autism. J Appl Behav Anal 2017; 50:756-774. [DOI: 10.1002/jaba.415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2015] [Accepted: 10/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
8
|
Abstract
The Analysis of Verbal Behavior (TAVB) is the only journal focused on theoretical and empirical research in verbal behavior. An assessment of authorship trends can provide a critical perspective on practices in verbal behavior analysis (e.g., participation by non-US institutions, contributions by female authors). The present study examines authorship trends in all articles published in TAVB since its inception (between 1982 and 2016). All authors and their affiliations were listed and the first authors denoted as such. Authors were characterized as follows: prolificacy, new vs. frequent contributor status, number of co-authors, editor status, fellow status in a professional organization, and gender. Institutional affiliations were characterized as follows: academic vs. nonacademic institutions, prolificacy, and location (country). The review included 383 articles by 487 authors from 200 institutions. Our findings revealed areas in which TAVB is reaching maturity (e.g., author gender) and areas in which further action by contributors and editors is needed (e.g., international participation).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo Dal Ben
- Department of Psychology, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Rodovia Washington Luis, km 235, n° 676, São Carlos, SP 13565-905 Brazil
| | - Celso Goyos
- Department of Psychology, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Rodovia Washington Luis, km 235, n° 676, São Carlos, SP 13565-905 Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Petursdottir AI, Lepper TL. Inducing Novel Vocalizations by Conditioning Speech Sounds as Reinforcers. Behav Anal Pract 2015; 8:223-232. [PMID: 27703924 PMCID: PMC5048284 DOI: 10.1007/s40617-015-0088-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Automatic reinforcement by response-produced auditory stimuli has long been hypothesized to play a role in the vocal development of infants. Clinicians and researchers have translated this idea into stimulus pairing interventions intended to increase novel vocalizations of nonverbal children with autism and other developmental disabilities by conditioning speech sounds as reinforcers. A number of studies have demonstrated positive effects of stimulus pairing procedures, but negative results have also been reported in the literature. This article provides a brief review of the existing literature on stimulus pairing procedures and a discussion of alternative procedures that may serve to establish speech sounds as reinforcers. Directions for future research are discussed and recommendations provided to clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Ingeborg Petursdottir
- grid.264766.70000000122891930Department of Psychology, Texas Christian University, Box 298920, Fort Worth, TX 76129 USA
| | - Tracy L. Lepper
- grid.259805.30000000419368374McNeese State University, 4205 Ryan St, Lake Charles, LA 70605 USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shillingsburg MA, Hollander DL, Yosick RN, Bowen C, Muskat LR. Stimulus-Stimulus Pairing to Increase Vocalizations in Children with Language Delays: a Review. Anal Verbal Behav 2015; 31:215-35. [PMID: 27606213 PMCID: PMC4883566 DOI: 10.1007/s40616-015-0042-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Stimulus-stimulus pairing (SSP) is a procedure used to increase vocalizations in children with significant language delays. However, results from studies that have examined the effectiveness of SSP have been discrepant. The following review of the literature summarizes the results from 13 experiments published between 1996 and 2014 that used this procedure with children with language delays. Studies were analyzed across various participant and procedural variables, and an effect size estimate (nonoverlap of all pairs) was calculated for a portion of the participants in the studies reviewed. Results indicated an overall moderate intervention effect for SSP of speech sounds. Recommendations are provided for future researchers about information to report and potential avenues for future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Alice Shillingsburg
- Marcus Autism Center, 1920 Briarcliff Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA ; Emory University, Atlanta, GA USA
| | | | - Rachel N Yosick
- Marcus Autism Center, 1920 Briarcliff Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA
| | - Crystal Bowen
- Marcus Autism Center, 1920 Briarcliff Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA
| | - Lori R Muskat
- Georgia School of Professional Psychology, Argosy University, Atlanta, GA USA
| |
Collapse
|