Time-dependent recruitment of GAF, ISGF3 and IRF1 complexes shapes IFNα and IFNγ-activated transcriptional responses and explains mechanistic and functional overlap

Transcriptional control of interferon-stimulated genes

Interferon-induced genes are among the best-studied groups of coregulated genes. Nevertheless, intense research into their regulation, supported by new technologies, is continuing to provide insights into their many layers of transcriptional regulation and to reveal how cellular transcriptomes change with pathogen-induced innate and adaptive immunity. This article gives an overview of recent findings on interferon-induced gene regulation, paying attention to contributions beyond the canonical JAK-STAT pathways.

Acute effects of TLR3 agonist Poly(I:C) on bone marrow hematopoietic progenitor cells in mice

Hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) in bone marrow with limited abilities for self-renewal and differentiation continuously supply hematopoietic cells through life. When suffering infection or inflammation, HPCs will actively proliferate to provide differentiated hematopoietic cells to maintain hematopoietic homeostasis. Poly(I:C), an agonist of TLR3, can specifically activate Type I interferon (IFN-I) signaling which exerts anti-inflammatory effects and influence hematopoiesis after infection. However, the effects of Poly(I:C)-induced IFN-I on the bone marrow hematopoietic system still deserve attention. In this study, our results revealed the efficacy of the IFN-I model, with a remarkably decrease in HPCs and a sharp elevation in LSKs numbers after single dose of Poly(I:C) injection. Apoptotic ratios of HPCs and LSKs significantly increased 48 h after Poly(I:C) treatment. Application of Poly(I:C) prompted the transition of HPCs and LSKs from G0 to G1 phases, potentially leading to the accelerated exhaustion of HPCs. From the cobblestone area-forming cell (CAFC) assay, we speculate that Poly(I:C) impairs the differentiation capacity of HPCs as well as their colony-forming ability. RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry revealed significant upregulation of IFN-I associated genes and proteins following Poly(I:C) treatment. In conclusion, a single dose of Poly(I:C) induced an acute detrimental effect on HPCs within 48 h potentially due to TLR3 engagement. This activation cascaded into a robust IFN-I response emanating from the bone marrow, underscoring the intricate immunological dynamics at play following Poly(I:C) intervention.

Inhibition of insulin-like growth factors increases production of CXCL9/10 by macrophages and fibroblasts and facilitates CD8+ cytotoxic T cell recruitment to pancreatic tumours

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly lethal malignancy with an urgent unmet clinical need for new therapies. Using a combination of in vitro assays and in vivo preclinical models we demonstrate that therapeutic inhibition of the IGF signalling axis promotes the accumulation of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells within the tumour microenvironment of PDAC tumours. Mechanistically, we show that IGF blockade promotes macrophage and fibroblast production of the chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 to facilitate CD8+ T cell recruitment and trafficking towards the PDAC tumour. Exploring this pathway further, we show that IGF inhibition leads to increased STAT1 transcriptional activity, correlating with a downregulation of the AKT/STAT3 signalling axis, in turn promoting Cxcl9 and Cxcl10 gene transcription. Using patient derived tumour explants, we also demonstrate that our findings translate into the human setting. PDAC tumours are frequently described as "immunologically cold", therefore bolstering CD8+ T cell recruitment to PDAC tumours through IGF inhibition may serve to improve the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors which rely on the presence of CD8+ T cells in tumours.

Opposing tumor-cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic roles of the IRF1 transcription factor in antitumor immunity

Type I interferon (IFN-I) and IFN-γ foster antitumor immunity by facilitating T cell responses. Paradoxically, IFNs may promote T cell exhaustion by activating immune checkpoints. The downstream regulators of these disparate responses are incompletely understood. Here, we describe how interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF1) orchestrates these opposing effects of IFNs. IRF1 expression in tumor cells blocks Toll-like receptor- and IFN-I-dependent host antitumor immunity by preventing interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) and effector programs in immune cells. In contrast, expression of IRF1 in the host is required for antitumor immunity. Mechanistically, IRF1 binds distinctly or together with STAT1 at promoters of immunosuppressive but not immunostimulatory ISGs in tumor cells. Overexpression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in Irf1-/- tumors only partially restores tumor growth, suggesting multifactorial effects of IRF1 on antitumor immunity. Thus, we identify that IRF1 expression in tumor cells opposes host IFN-I- and IRF1-dependent antitumor immunity to facilitate immune escape and tumor growth.

Role of interferons in the antiviral battle: from virus-host crosstalk to prophylactic and therapeutic potential in SARS-CoV-2 infection

Mammalians sense antigenic messages from infectious agents that penetrate the respiratory and digestive epithelium, as well as signals from damaged host cells through membrane and cytosolic receptors. The transduction of these signals triggers a personalized response, depending on the nature of the stimulus and the host's genetics, physiological condition, and comorbidities. Interferons (IFNs) are the primary effectors of the innate immune response, and their synthesis is activated in most cells within a few hours after pathogen invasion. IFNs are primarily synthesized in infected cells, but their anti-infective effect is extended to the neighboring cells by autocrine and paracrine action. The emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic in 2019 was a stark reminder of the potential threat posed by newly emerging viruses. This pandemic has also triggered an overwhelming influx of research studies aiming to unveil the mechanisms of protective versus pathogenic host immune responses induced by SARS-CoV-2. The purpose of this review is to describe the role of IFNs as vital players in the battle against SARS-CoV-2 infection. We will briefly characterize and classify IFNs, present the inductors of IFN synthesis, their sensors, and signaling pathways, and then discuss the role of IFNs in controlling the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 infection and its clinical outcome. Finally, we will present the perspectives and controversies regarding the prophylactic and therapeutic potential of IFNs in SARS-CoV-2 infection.

ISGF3 and STAT2/IRF9 Control Basal and IFN-Induced Transcription through Genome-Wide Binding of Phosphorylated and Unphosphorylated Complexes to Common ISRE-Containing ISGs

In addition to the canonical ISGF3 and non-canonical STAT2/IRF9 complexes, evidence is emerging of the role of their unphosphorylated counterparts in IFN-dependent and -independent ISG transcription. To better understand the relation between ISGF3 and U-ISGF3 and STAT2/IRF9 and U-STAT2/IRF9 in IFN-I-stimulated transcriptional responses, we performed RNA-Seq and ChIP-Seq, in combination with phosphorylation inhibition and antiviral experiments. First, we identified a group of ISRE-containing ISGs that were commonly regulated in IFNα-treated WT and STAT1-KO cells. Thus, in 2fTGH and Huh7.5 WT cells, early and long-term IFNα-inducible transcription and antiviral activity relied on the DNA recruitment of the ISGF3 components STAT1, STAT2 and IRF9 in a phosphorylation- and time-dependent manner. Likewise, in ST2-U3C and Huh-STAT1KO cells lacking STAT1, delayed IFN responses correlated with DNA binding of phosphorylated STAT2/IRF9 but not U-STAT2/IRF9. In addition, comparative experiments in U3C (STAT1-KO) cells overexpressing all the ISGF3 components (ST1-ST2-IRF9-U3C) revealed U-ISGF3 (and possibly U-STAT2/IRF9) chromatin interactions to correlate with phosphorylation-independent ISG transcription and antiviral activity. Together, our data point to the dominant role of the canonical ISGF3 and non-canonical STAT2/IRF9, without a shift to U-ISGF3 or U-STAT2/IRF9, in the regulation of early and prolonged ISG expression and viral protection. At the same time, they suggest the threshold-dependent role of U-ISFG3, and potentially U-STAT2/IRF9, in the regulation of constitutive and possibly long-term IFNα-dependent responses.