1
|
Sacca L, Zerrouki Y, Burgoa S, Okwaraji G, Li A, Arshad S, Gerges M, Tevelev S, Kelly S, Knecht M, Kitsantas P, Hunter R, Scott L, Reynolds AP, Colon G, Retrouvey M. Exploring measurement tools used to assess knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of pregnant women toward prenatal screening: A systematic review. WOMEN'S HEALTH (LONDON, ENGLAND) 2024; 20:17455057241273557. [PMID: 39206551 PMCID: PMC11363050 DOI: 10.1177/17455057241273557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2024] [Revised: 05/28/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
There is a lack of standardized measurement tools globally to assess knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of expecting women toward prenatal screening. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify reasons women pursue or decline prenatal screening and compare the strengths and limitations of available measurement tools used to assess pregnant women's perceptions, knowledge, and attitudes toward prenatal screening. This review followed the five-step York methodology by Arksey and O'Malley and incorporated recommendations from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis checklist for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results. The five steps consisted of: (1) identification of the research questions; (2) searching for relevant studies; (3) selection of studies relevant to the research questions; (4) data charting; and (5) collation, summarization, and reporting of results. Four online databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) were selected after the librarian's development of a detailed search strategy. The Rayyan platform was used between June 2023 and August 2023 to epitomize the articles produced from our search. A total of 68 eligible studies were included in the analysis. The top five major reasons for declining prenatal screening uptake included (1) being unsure of the risk of prenatal screening and harm to the baby or miscarriage (n = 15), (2) not considering action such as termination of pregnancy for prenatal screening to be considered as necessary (n = 14), (3) high cost (n = 12), (4) lack of knowledge about testing procedures and being anxious about the test (n = 10), and (5) being worried about probability of false negative or false positive results (n = 6). Only 32 studies utilized scientifically validated instruments. Difficulties in capturing representative, adequately sized samples inclusive of diverse ethnicities and demographics were pervasive. Findings highlight the need for rigorous validation of research measurement methodologies to ensure the accuracy and applicability of resulting data regarding the assessment of prenatal screening perceptions, knowledge, and attitudes across diverse female populations.Registration: N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lea Sacca
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - Yasmine Zerrouki
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - Sara Burgoa
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - Goodness Okwaraji
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - Ashlee Li
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - Shaima Arshad
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - Maria Gerges
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - Stacey Tevelev
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - Sophie Kelly
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - Michelle Knecht
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - Panagiota Kitsantas
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - Robert Hunter
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Memorial HealthCare System, Hollywood, FL, USA
| | - Laurie Scott
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Memorial HealthCare System, Hollywood, FL, USA
| | | | - Gabriela Colon
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Memorial HealthCare System, Hollywood, FL, USA
| | - Michele Retrouvey
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yeşilçinar İ, Güvenç G. Counselling and education for prenatal screening and diagnostic tests for pregnant women: Randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Pract 2021; 27:e13000. [PMID: 34374162 DOI: 10.1111/ijn.13000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2020] [Revised: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of education and counselling on prenatal screening and diagnostic tests on pregnant women's decisional conflict, anxiety levels and attitudes towards the tests. BACKGROUND Clinical practice guidelines recommend prenatal genetic counselling for pregnant women before participation in the tests. METHODS A total of 210 pregnant women participated in the study by completing the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-I, Decisional Conflict Scale, SURE Scale, Knowledge Assessment Forms, Decision Satisfaction Form and Attitudes Scale between June 2017 and March 2018. In the first stage, pregnant women were evaluated who had only prenatal genetic screening tests and in the second stage, pregnant women who had been recommended to receive diagnostic tests. The intervention group received face-to-face individual education and counselling about prenatal genetic tests. Independent samples t test, t tests and Pearson correlation tests were used. RESULTS Education and counselling for prenatal screening tests and diagnostic tests from the first weeks of pregnancy were effective in decreasing anxiety, decisional conflict, increasing attitudes towards tests and had positive effects on pregnant women's knowledge level and decision satisfaction (P < 0.005). CONCLUSION Prenatal genetic counselling and education are more effective if provided from the first weeks of pregnancy. Decreasing anxiety, decisional conflict and increasing knowledge levels of pregnant women are important to make informed decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- İlknur Yeşilçinar
- Health Sciences Faculty, Nursing Department, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Gülten Güvenç
- Gülhane Faculty of Nursing, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Canh Chuong N, Minh Duc D, Anh ND, Thi Vui L, Pham Sy Cuong L, Thi Thuy Duong D, Thi Thu Ha B. Amniocentesis test uptake for congenital defects: Decision of pregnant women in Vietnam. Health Care Women Int 2018; 39:493-504. [PMID: 29319434 DOI: 10.1080/07399332.2018.1424168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Our study aimed to identify the knowledge, attitude, and factors associated with uptake of amniocentesis test amongst pregnant women of advanced maternal age (35+ years old). A cross-sectional survey was performed on 481 participants in 2016. Women with higher educational attainment, higher income level, having a baby with congenital defects, and women with better knowledge and/or attitude about amniocentesis test were more likely to accept the test. Our study suggested the importance of counseling for women and more time should be given for them to absorb information before they make their decision to uptake the amniocentesis test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nguyen Canh Chuong
- a Center for Prenatal Diagnosis and Testing, Hanoi Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital , Ba Dinh District, Hanoi , Vietnam
| | - Duong Minh Duc
- b Department of Reproductive Health , Hanoi University of Public Health , Bac Tu Liem District, Hanoi , Vietnam.,c International Maternal and Child Health (IMCH), Department of Women's and Children's Health , Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden
| | - Nguyen Duy Anh
- d Department of Assisted Reproductive Techniques , Hanoi Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital , Ba Dinh District, Hanoi , Vietnam
| | - Le Thi Vui
- b Department of Reproductive Health , Hanoi University of Public Health , Bac Tu Liem District, Hanoi , Vietnam
| | - Le Pham Sy Cuong
- a Center for Prenatal Diagnosis and Testing, Hanoi Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital , Ba Dinh District, Hanoi , Vietnam
| | - Doan Thi Thuy Duong
- b Department of Reproductive Health , Hanoi University of Public Health , Bac Tu Liem District, Hanoi , Vietnam
| | - Bui Thi Thu Ha
- b Department of Reproductive Health , Hanoi University of Public Health , Bac Tu Liem District, Hanoi , Vietnam
| |
Collapse
|