Impact of D-dimer level on postinterventional coronary flow and in-hospital MACE in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

The diagnostic and prognostic value of D-dimer in different types of aortic dissection

Objective

To evaluate the serum D-dimer level and its diagnostic and prognostic predictive value in patients with different types of aortic dissection.

Methods

Eighty-four aortic dissection patients who were diagnosed clinically in our hospital from January 2017 to January 2021 were selected for the study. All patients were divided into Stanford type A (39 cases) and Stanford type B (45 cases) groups. The serum D-dimer level was detected at 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 72 h after admission to the hospital, and its expression level with different types of aortic dissection was analyzed. The relationship between D-dimer and the prognosis of patients was also analyzed.

Results

The serum D-dimer levels of patients in group A were significantly higher than those in group B at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 72 h after admission, and the differences were statistically significant. In group A, 16 patients died, and 23 patients survived, while in group B, 18 patients died, and 27 patients survived. The serum D-dimer level of the dead and surviving patients in group A was significantly higher than that of group B, and the serum D-dimer level of dead patients in groups A and B was significantly higher than that of surviving patients. For diagnostic value, the AUC was 0.89, sensitivity was 76.92%, specificity was 90.00% in group A, and the AUC was 0.82, sensitivity was 71.11%, and specificity was 85.00% in group B. For the prognostic predicted value, the AUC was 0.74 in group A, while the AUC was 0.69 in group B.

Conclusions

D-dimer has different serum levels in different types of aortic dissection patients, with higher levels in Stanford A. Serum D-dimer levels may be used as a better biomarker to diagnose the two types of aortic dissection and play an important role in patient prognostic prediction, especially Stanford type A.

Prognostic Value of Age-Adjusted D-Dimer Cutoff Thresholds in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Treated by Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND

Associations between D-dimer and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remain controversial. Using age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff thresholds improve the diagnostic accuracy for thrombotic diseases. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of age-adjusted D-dimer in ACS patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

A total of 3972 consecutive patients with ACS treated by PCI were retrospectively recruited. The basal age-adjusted D-dimer threshold was 500 ng/mL and was calculated as age × 10 in patients older than 50 years. Cox regression was used for outcome analysis. C-index, net reclassification index (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were calculated to assess the additional prognostic value of age-adjusted D-dimer when combined with established clinical risk factors. The primary outcome was all-cause death.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 720 days, a total of 225 deaths occurred. High D-dimer level, as defined by age-adjusted thresholds, was an independent predictor for all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32-2.31, P < 0.001), cardiac death (HR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.30-2.60, P = 0.001), and MACE (HR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.19-1.83, P < 0.001). Sensitivity and subgroup analysis showed that high D-dimer levels were constantly associated with worse outcomes across common risk factors and comorbidities. Besides, age-adjusted elevation of D-dimer significantly improved the risk predictions for all-cause death when added to the model of established risk factors (C-index: 0.846 vs 0.838, Δ C-index: 0.008, 95% CI: 0.001-0.015, Pdifference = 0.027; NRI: 0.645, 95% CI: 0.464-0.826, P < 0.001; IDI: 0.008, 95% CI: 0.001-0.017, P = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

In ACS patients treated by PCI, age-adjusted elevation of D-dimer was an independent predictor for adverse outcomes and improved the risk predictions for long-term mortality.

D-dimer for risk stratification and antithrombotic treatment management in acute coronary syndrome patients: asystematic review and metanalysis

BACKGROUND

Data on the prognostic role of D-dimer in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are controversial. Our aim was to summarize current evidence on the association between D-dimer levels and short/long-term poor prognosis of ACS patients. We also investigated the association between D-dimer and no-reflow phenomenon.

METHODS

Systematic review and metanalysis of observational studies including ACS patients and reporting data on D-dimer levels. PubMed and SCOPUS databases were searched. Data were combined with hazard ratio (HR) and metanalysed. The principal endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular events (CVEs) including myocardial infarction, all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.

RESULTS

Overall, 32 studies included in the systematic review with 28,869 patients. Of them, 6 studies investigated in-hospital and 26 studies long-term outcomes. Overall, 23 studies showed positive association of high D-dimer levels with CVEs. D-dimer levels predicted poor prognosis in all studies reporting in-hospital outcomes. Five studies satisfied inclusion criteria and were included in the metanalysis, with a total of 8616 patients. Median follow-up was 13.2 months with 626 CVEs. The pooled HR for D-dimer levels and CVEs was 1.264 (95% CI 1.134-1.409). Five out of 7 studies (4195 STEMI patients) investigating the association between D-dimer levels and no-reflow showed a positive correlation of D-dimer levels with no-reflow.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ACS, D-dimer was associated with higher in-hospital and short/long-term complications. D-dimer was also higher in patients with no-reflow phenomenon. The use of D-dimer may help to identify patients with residual thrombotic risk after ACS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews: CRD42021267233 .

Gender-Related Difference in D-Dimer Level Predicts In-Hospital Heart Failure after Primary PCI for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Aims

The prognostic value of plasma D-dimer in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) remains controversial. The study is aimed at investigating the relationship between plasma D-dimer levels and in-hospital heart failure (HF) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI).

Methods

STEMI patients who underwent pPCI were enrolled in this study. Venous blood samples were collected from patients on admission before pPCI procedure. The study endpoint was the occurrence of in-hospital HF. The participants were divided into two groups according to plasma D-dimer levels and further compared baseline D-dimer levels between male and female. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed to evaluate the relationship of D-dimer and in-hospital HF.

Results

A total of 778 patients were recruited in the study, of which 539 (69.3%) patients had normal D-dimer levels (≤0.5 mg/L) while 239 (30.7%) had increased D-dimer levels (>0.5 mg/L). The female patients have higher D-dimer levels and higher incident rate of in-hospital HF than that in male patients (p < 0.001). The multivariate logistic regression model revealed that D-dimer was an independent predictor for in-hospital HF in overall population (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.197, 95% CI: 1.003-1.429, and p = 0.046) and female patients (adjusted OR: 1.429, 95% CI: 1.083-1.885, and p = 0.012).

Conclusion

Increased plasma D-dimer levels were an independent risk factor for incidence of in-hospital HF in STEMI patients who underwent pPCI, especially in female patients, which provides guidance for clinicians in identifying patients at high risk of developing HF and lowering their risk.

D-Dimer to Fibrinogen Ratio as a Novel Prognostic Marker in Patients After Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Retrospective Cohort Study

The role of activation of the coagulation and fibrinolysis system in the pathogenesis and prognosis of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) has drawn wide attention. Recently, the D-dimer to fibrinogen ratio (DFR) is considered as a useful biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of ischemic stroke and pulmonary embolism. However, few studies have explored the relationship between DFR and cardiovascular disease. In our study, patients were divided into 2 groups according to DFR value: the lower group (DFR < 0.52, n = 2123) and the higher group (DFR ≥ 0.52, n = 1073). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality (ACM) and cardiac mortality (CM). The average follow-up time was 37.59 ± 22.24 months. We found that there were significant differences between the 2 groups in term of ACM (2.4% vs 6.6%, P < 0.001) and CM (1.5% vs 4.0%, P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that elevated DFR had higher incidences of ACM (log rank P < 0.001) and CM (log rank P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that DFR was an independent predictor of ACM (HR = 1.743, 95%CI: 1.187-2.559 P = 0.005) and CM (HR = 1.695, 95%CI: 1.033-2.781 P = 0.037). This study indicates that DFR is an independent and novel predictor of long-term ACM and CM in post-PCI patients with CAD.

Prognostic Value of Baseline d-Dimer Level in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis

The prognostic significance of d-dimer level in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is not fully established. This meta-analysis aimed to examine the association between elevated d-dimer level at baseline and adverse outcomes in patients with CAD. Two independent authors comprehensively searched PubMed and Embase databases from their inception to December 31, 2020. All observational studies reporting the values of baseline d-dimer level in predicting the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) or survival outcomes in patients with CAD were included. The prognostic values were calculated by pooling adjusted RR with 95% CI for the highest versus the lowest d-dimer level. Thirteen studies consisting of 25 600 patients with CAD were identified. Comparison between the highest and lowest d-dimer level showed that the pooled multivariable adjusted RR was 1.69 (95% CI, 1.53-1.86) for all-cause mortality, 2.37 (95% CI, 1.52-3.69) for cardiovascular mortality, and 1.44 (95% CI, 1.19-1.74) for MACEs, respectively. Elevated blood level of d-dimer at baseline was independently associated with higher risk of MACEs, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality in patients with CAD. The baseline d-dimer level may have important prognostic value in patients with CAD.

Prognostic Value of D-dimer in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated by percutaneous coronary intervention: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Associations between D-dimer and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remain controversial. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of D-dimer in ACS patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

In this observational study, 3972 consecutive patients with ACS treated by PCI were retrospectively recruited. The X-tile program was used to determine the optimal D-dimer thresholds for risk stratifications. Cox regression with multiple adjustments was used for outcome analysis. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was performed to assess the dose-response association between D-dimer and outcomes. The C-index was calculated to evaluate the additional prognostic value of D-dimer when added to clinical risk factors and commonly used clinical risk scores, with internal validations using bootstrapping methods. The primary outcome was all-cause death.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 720 days, 225 deaths occurred. Based on the thresholds generated by X-tile, ACS-PCI patients with median (420-1150 ng/mL, hazard ratio [HR]: 1.58, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-2.20, P = 0.007) and high (≥ 1150 ng/mL, HR: 1.98, 95 % CI: 1.36-2.89, P < 0.001) levels of D-dimer showed substantially higher risk of death compared to those with low D-dimer (< 420 ng/mL). RCS analysis depicted a constant relation between D-dimer and various outcomes. The addition of D-dimer levels significantly improved risk predictions for all-cause death when combined with the fully adjusted models (C-index: 0.853 vs. 0.845, P difference = 0.021), the GRACE score (C-index: 0.826 vs. 0.814, P difference = 0.027), and the TIMI score (C-index: 0.804 vs. 0.776, P difference < 0.001). The predicted mortality at the median follow-up (two years) was 1.7 %, 5.2 %, and 10.9 % for patients with low, median, and high D-dimer, respectively, which was well matched with the observed mortality (low D-dimer group: 1.2 %, median D-dimer group: 5.2 %, and high D-dimer group: 12.6 %).

CONCLUSIONS

For ACS patients treated by PCI, D-dimer level was an independent predictor for adverse outcomes, and provided additional prognostic value when combined with clinical risk factors and risk scores. Risk stratifications based on D-dimer was plausible to differentiate ACS-PCI patients with higher risk of death.

D-dimers are associated with coronary artery disease severity assessed using Syntax and Syntax II scores in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

D-dimers are a determinant of hypercoagulable state and have been found to be related to acute coronary syndromes. We aimed to establish the association between increased D-dimer levels and coronary artery disease (CAD) severity using SYNTAX Score (SS) II in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 300 consecutive patients (81.7% males, mean age 55±12 years) with STEMI who underwent a primary PCI. Patients were divided into two groups according to their median SSII [SSII<25 as a low group (n=151) and SSII≥25 as a high group (n=149)]. Blood samples for D-dimers and the other biochemical parameters were obtained from each patient at admission.

RESULTS

When compared with the low SSII group, frequency of female gender, no-reflow phenomenon, D-dimer levels, thrombus score, creatine kinase MB and troponin were significantly higher, whereas left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were lower in the high SSII group (p<0.05, for all). D-dimer levels, thrombus score, LVEF, GFR and no-reflow phenomenon were independent predictors of CAD severity (p<0.05, for all). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the D-dimer cut-off value for predicting the severity of CAD was 0.26 μg/ml (69.8% sensitivity and 65.6% specificity, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Increased D-dimer levels are associated with the severity of CAD based on Syntax Score II, in patients with STEMI who successfully underwent revascularization with a primary PCI.

Predictive values of D-dimer for the long-term prognosis of acute ST-segment elevation infarction: A retrospective study in southwestern China

D-dimer is a primary degradation product of cross-linked fibrin, and can be an effective diagnostic factor of venous thromboembolism. However, its prognostic role in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate whether D-dimer has a predictive value for long-term prognosis in patients with STEMI.We retrospectively enrolled 872 STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients were divided into quartiles according to their admission D-dimer increased multiple, with the highest quartile (G4) (n = 219) defined as increased multiple ≧1.33, and the lowest quartile (G1) (n = 215) as increased multiple ≦0.33.Compared with G1, higher in-hospital heart failure (40.2% vs 10.2%, P < .0001), malignant arrhythmia (14.2% vs 2.3%, P < .0001), and all-cause mortality (5.9% vs 0%, P < .0001) rates were observed in G4. After a follow-up period of 29 months, 84 patients had died. In the Cox multivariate analysis, a high admission D-dimer increased multiple (≧1.33) was found to be an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (hazards ratio: 2.53, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-6.26, P = .045).Thus, there was an association between a high D-dimer level and the increase in in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events, such as heart failure, malignant arrhythmias, and death. High D-dimer level was also an independent predictor of long-term all-cause mortality.

D-Dimer Level Predicts Angiographic No-Reflow Phenomenon After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Within 2-7 Days of Symptom Onset in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

It remains uncertain whether plasma D-dimer level can predict no-reflow in patients with STEMI who had pPCI after 48 h of symptom onset. This study retrospectively enrolled 229 consecutive patients who had pPCI for acute STEMI within 2-7 days of symptom onset between January 2008 and December 2018. Patients were divided into no-reflow group (TIMI flow grade 0-2) and reflow group (TIMI flow grade 3). Predictors of no-reflow were assessed by univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses. Plasma D-dimer level can independently predict no-reflow in patients with STEMI who had pPCI within 2-7 days of symptom onset (OR 2.52 per 1 mg/L increase, 95% CI 1.16-5.47, p = 0.019). This finding indicated that pPCI may be safe and feasible for STEMI patients within 2-7 days of symptom onset with low D-dimer level. Graphical Abstract Plasma D-dimer level can independently predict no-reflow in patients with STEMI who had pPCI within 2-7 days of symptom onset. pPCI may be safe and feasible for STEMI patients within 2-7 days of symptom onset with low D-dimer level.

D-dimer as a thrombus biomarker for predicting 2-year mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention

Background:

D-dimer has predictive value for mortality in some diseases. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between D-dimer and mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods:

We examined 10,724 consecutive patients who underwent PCI between January 2013 and December 2013. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, and the secondary endpoint was cardiac mortality. Patients were divided according to the median D-dimer level of 0.28 μg/ml. Multivariable model were including age, sex, and risk factors after stepwise selection.

Results:

After a 2-year follow up, 8565 patients with D-dimer data were analyzed. There were 116 (1.35%) all-cause deaths and 64 (0.75%) cardiac deaths. D-dimer levels were significantly higher in the all-cause mortality group [0.42 (0.29, 0.68) μg/ml] and cardiac mortality group [0.48 (0.30, 0.81) μg/ml] than in the survival group [0.28 (0.20, 0.41) μg/ml] (both p < 0.001). Multivariate-adjusted Cox hazard analysis showed that high D-dimer levels (⩾0.28 μg/ml) were significantly associated with all-cause mortality in the total population [hazard ratio (HR): 2.35, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.44–3.84, p = 0.001], acute coronary syndrome (ACS) subgroup (HR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.08–3.38, p = 0.027), and stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) subgroup (HR: 3.82, 95% CI: 1.45–10.10, p = 0.007). High D-dimer levels were significantly associated with cardiac mortality in the total population (HR: 3.44, 95% CI: 1.61–7.36, p = 0.001) and the ACS subgroup (HR: 3.33, 95% CI: 1.38–8.03, p = 0.007), but not in the SCAD subgroup (HR: 3.68, 95% CI: 0.80–16.91, p = 0.094).

Conclusions:

D-dimer levels are independently associated with 2-year all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality in patients undergoing PCI.

D-dimer level predicts in-hospital adverse outcomes after primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Use of D-dimer for prognostication of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains controversial and undefined among those with angiographically evident thrombus or no-reflow phenomenon.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed consecutive STEMI patients who received primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University from January 2008 to December 2018. Outcomes were in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: cardiac death, non-fatal acute myocardial infarction, re-vascularization and stroke), peak troponin T and NT-proBNP levels, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and hospitalization duration.

RESULTS

Among 1165 patients, those with increased (≥0.8 mg/L, n = 224, 19.2%) vs. normal (n = 941, 80.8%) D-dimer level were older; more often women and non-smokers. Increased D-dimer group had similar frequency of AET (58.7% vs. 62.1%, P = .353), more frequently no-reflow phenomenon (13.1% vs. 18.8%, P = .028), higher peak values of troponin T (3.5 [0.9-7.0] vs. 4.5 [1.8-8.7], P = .001) and NT-proBNP (903.3 [532.3-2098.5] vs. 2070.0 [859.1-4378.0], p < .001). In increased D-dimer group, LVEF (53.3 ± 8.3 vs. 48.8 ± 9.8, P < .001) was lower, hospitalization was longer (8.0 ± 4.9 vs. 10.5 ± 6.9 days, P < .001) and risk of developing in-hospital MACE (1.5% vs. 12.1%, P < .001) was greater. D-dimer level was an independent risk factor for MACE (OR 8.408, 95%CI 4.065-17.392, P < .001), including the angiographically evident thrombus (OR 6.939, 95% CI 2.944-16.355, P < .001) and the no-reflow (OR 8.114, 95% CI 1.598-41.196, P = .012) subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased D-dimer level was an independent risk factor for in-hospital MACE in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, including those with angiographically evident thrombus and no-reflow phenomenon. D-dimer was not associated to no-reflow phenomenon in STEMI patients.

Gender-Specific Predictive Markers of Poor Prognosis for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction During a 6-Month Follow-up

Mounting evidence indicates the impact of gender difference on the assessment, treatment, and outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, gender-specific prognostic markers of AMI are still lacking. The present study aimed to investigate gender-specific markers of poor prognosis (all-cause mortality or readmission) in a cohort of AMI patients followed up for 6 months. Compared with males (n = 157), females (n = 40) were older and more frequent with previous medical history of hypertension and diabetes mellitus. During the 6-month follow-up, BUN ≥ 7.73 mM, myoglobin ≥ 705.8 ng/mL, and Killip classification 2-4 were identified as the independent predictors of poor prognosis for male AMI patients, while D-dimer ≥ 0.43 mg/L as an independent predictor of poor prognosis in female AMI patients. In conclusion, our data suggest that prognostic markers for AMI patients may differ according to genders. Gender-specific prognostic markers may be useful to guide the risk stratification, clinical therapy, and medications for AMI patients.

Hospital mortality in acute coronary syndrome: adjustment of GRACE score by D-dimer enables a more accurate prediction in a prospective cohort study

Backgroud

To assess the value of D-dimer and its combination with The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score in predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods

In 5923 ACS patients undergoing PCI, the role of D-dimer and the added value of D-dimer to GRACE score for predicting in-hospital mortality were tested.

Results

After multivariable adjustment, D-dimer could significantly predict in-hospital mortality. Also, it could significantly improve the prognostic performance of GRACE score (C-statistic: z = 2.269, p = 0.023; IDI: 0.016, p = 0.032; NRI: 0.291, p = 0.035).

Conclusion

In patients with ACS undergoing PCI, D-dimer was an independent predictor of in-hospital death. It could also improve the prognostic performance of GRACE score.

D-dimer levels enhance the discriminatory capacity of bleeding risk scores for predicting in-hospital bleeding events in acute pulmonary embolism

INTRODUCTION

Bleeding is a major complication of anticoagulation in acute pulmonary embolism (APE) while estimating individual bleeding risk remains challenging. Elevated D-dimer levels (DD) have been shown to predict bleeding events.

OBJECTIVES

(1) direct comparison of the capacity of bleeding risk prediction scores (VTE-BLEED, RIETE, HAS-BLED, HEMORR₂HAGES) to prognosticate in-hospital bleeding events in the acute phase of APE in a real-life population of APE patients;(2) augmentation of the discriminative capacity of fore mentioned scores with DD.

MATERIALS

Post-hoc analysis of a prospective observational study. DD levels were measured using the VIDAS D-dimer Exclusion test. Receiver operating characteristic curves, areas under the curve (AUC) for bleeding prediction were calculated for scores and DD. Bleeding scores+DD were compared using an established index quantifying the reclassification of patients (net reclassification index, NRI).

RESULTS

310 APE patients were included. 35(11.3%) bleeding events occurred (hematomas, GI, urinary tract, retroperitoneal, uterine, CNS, respiratory tract): 17 major (MB) and 18 clinically-relevant non-major bleedings (CRNMB), none were fatal. All scores had satisfactory AUCs (0.754-0.767), except HAS-BLED (AUC = 0.512; 0.455-0.569). DD were higher in patients with bleeding events (29,911 ng/ml vs. 4805 ng/ml, p = .031), AUC 0.621(0.520-0.721), p = .02. DD = 5750 ng/ml was characterized by OR = 2.3(95%CI 1.05-5.0) for all bleeding events. Adding DD improved the discriminatory capacity of tested scores in the non-high risk of bleeding category, NRI 0.07-03.

CONCLUSIONS

Of the tested scores RIETE, HEMORR₂HAGES, VTE-BLEED performed best at identifying APE patients at risk of in-hospital bleeding complications. DD levels may predict in-hospital bleeding events and may improve identifying patients classified as non-high risk who experience bleeding complications.

Widely Used Types and Clinical Applications of D-Dimer Assay

D-dimers are formed by the breakdown of fibrinogen and fibrin during fibrinolysis. D-dimer analysis is critical for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Modern assays for D-dimer are monoclonal antibody based. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is the reference method for D-dimer analysis in the central clinical laboratory, but is time consuming to perform. Recently, a number of rapid, point-of-care D-dimer assays have been developed for acute care settings that utilize a variety of methodologies. In view of the diversity of D-dimer assays used in central laboratory and point-of-care settings, several caveats must be taken to assure the proper interpretation and clinical application of the results. These include consideration of preanalytical variables and interfering substances, as well as patient drug therapy and underlying disease. D-dimer assays should also be validated in clinical studies, have established cut-off values, and reported according to the reagent manufacturers recommendations.