Physical and clinical implications of radiotherapy treatment of prostate cancer using a full bladder protocol

Full bladder, empty rectum? Revisiting a paradigm in the era of adaptive radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Many patients find it challenging to comply with instructions regarding rectum and bladder filling during pelvic radiotherapy. With the implementation of online adaptive radiotherapy, the reproducibility of organ volumes is no longer a prerequisite. This study aims to analyze the sparing of the bladder and the posterior rectum wall (PRW) in conditions of full versus empty bladder and rectum.

METHODS

280 fractions from 14 patients with prostate cancer who underwent adaptive radiotherapy using the Varian Ethos system were analyzed post-hoc. Various metrics for the bladder and PRW were correlated with respect to organ volume.

RESULTS

Our analysis quantitatively confirms the advantage of a full bladder during radiotherapy, as metrics V48Gy and V40Gy significantly inversely correlate with bladder filling for each patient individually. While bladder volume did not show a gradual decrease over the course of radiotherapy, it was observed to be higher during planning CT scans compared to treatment sessions. A full rectum condition either significantly improved (in 2 out of 7 patients) or at least did not impair (in 5 out of 7 patients) PRW sparing, as represented by the V30Gy metric, when patients were compared individually. The average V30Gy across all patients demonstrated a significant improvement in PRW sparing for the full rectum condition, with a [Formula: see text]-value of 0.039.

CONCLUSION

Despite the implementation of adaptive therapy, maintaining a high bladder filling remains important. However, the recommendation for rectum filling can be abandoned, as reproducibility is not critical for adaptive radiotherapy and no dosimetric advantage per se is associated with an empty rectum. Patients may even be encouraged not to void their bowels shortly before treatment, as long as this is tolerated over the treatment session.

Influence of different urinary bladder filling levels and controlling regions of interest selection on deformable image registration algorithms

PURPOSE

Evaluation of Raystation ANAtomically CONstrained Deformation Algorithm (ANACONDA) performance to different urinary bladder filling levels in male pelvis anatomic site varying the controlling Regions Of Interest (ROIs).

METHODS

Different image datasets were obtained with ImSimQA (Oncology System Limited, Shrewsbury, UK) to evaluate ANACONDA performances (RaySearch Laboratories, Stockholm, Sweden). Deformation vector fields were applied to a synthetic man pelvis and a real patient computed tomography (CT) dataset (reference CTs) resulting in deformed CTs (target CTs) with various bladder filling levels. Different deformable image registrations (DIRs) were generated between each target CTs and reference CTs varying the controlling ROIs subset. Deformed ROIs were mapped from target CT to reference CT and then compared to reference ROIs. Evaluation was performed by Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Correlation Coefficient (CC), Mean Distance to Agreement (MDA), maximum Distance to Agreement (maxDA) and with the introduction of global DSC (global_DSC) and global CC (global_CC) parameters.

RESULTS

In both synthetic and real patient CT cases, DSC scored less than 0.75 and MDA greater than 3 mm when no ROIs or only bladder were exploited as controlling ROI. DSC and CC increased by increasing the number of controlling ROIs selected whereas, an opposite behavior was observed for MDA and maxDA.

CONCLUSIONS

ANACONDA performances can be influenced by bladder filling fluctuation if no controlling ROIs are selected. Global_DSC and global_CC are useful parameters to quantitatively compare DIR algorithms. DIR performances improve by increasing the number of controlling ROIs selected, reaching a saturation level after a defined ROIs subset selection.

Impact of bladder volume on acute genitourinary toxicity in intensity modulated radiotherapy for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of changes in bladder volume during high-dose intensity-modulated-radiotherapy (IMRT) of prostate cancer on acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity and prospectively evaluate a simple biofeedback technique for reproducible bladder filling with the aim of reducing acute GU toxicity.

METHODS

One hundred ninety-three patients were trained via a biofeedback mechanism to maintain a partially filled bladder with a reproducible volume of 200-300 cc at planning CT and subsequently at each fraction of radiotherapy. We prospectively analyzed whether and to what extent the patients' ability to maintain a certain bladder filling influenced the degree of acute GU toxicity and whether cut-off values could be differentiated.

RESULTS

We demonstrated that the ability to reach a reproducible bladder volume above a threshold volume of 180 cc and maintain that volume via biofeedback throughout treatment predicts for a decrease in acute GU toxicity during curative high-dose IMRT of the prostate. Patients who were not able to reach a partial bladder filling to that cut-off value and were not able to maintain a partially filled bladder throughout treatment had a significantly higher risk of developing ≥grade 2 GU acute toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Our results support the hypothesis that a biofeedback training for the patient is an easy-to-apply, useful, and cost-effective tool for reducing acute GU toxicity in high-dose IMRT of the prostate. Patients who are not able to reach and maintain a certain bladder volume during planning and treatment-two independent risk factors-might need special consideration.

A comparison of bladder volumes based on treatment planning CT and BladderScan® BVI 6100 ultrasound device in a prostate radiation therapy population

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study is to investigate if a handheld ultrasound device (BladderScan® BVI 6100) can accurately measure bladder volumes in prostate radiotherapy (RT) patients.

METHODS:

A comparison was made of contoured bladder volumes based on treatment planning CT (TPCT) and BladderScan® BVI 6100 ultrasound device in a large prostate RT population. Three bladder volume (BV) measurements were taken using the bladder volume instrument (BVI) device on prostate RT patients immediately prior to TPCT (n = 190). The CT delineation bladder volumes were also recorded. The mean of the three BVI readings (BVImean) and the maximum (BVImax) of the readings were considered for a comparative analysis.

RESULTS:

There was a strong positive correlation between the BVI and CT delineated bladder volumes (BVImean r = 0.825; BVImax r = 0.830). The mean difference [± standard deviation (SD)] was an underestimation of BV for both BVImean and BVImax (44.8 ± 88.2 ml and 32.9 ± 87.5 ml, respectively).

CONCLUSION:

This is the largest study to date (n = 190), assessing the accuracy of the BladderScan® BVI 6100 in the prostate RT population. The BVI 6100 provides an acceptable indication of BV for use in prostate RT patients for the purposes of monitoring BV.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:

The BladderScan® BVI 6100 provides a convenient and non-irradiating method of indicating BV for use in prostate RT patients.

Optimal bladder volume at treatment planning for prostate cancer patients receiving volumetric modulated arc therapy

PURPOSE

To investigate optimal bladder volumes at treatment planning (TP) in prostate cancer patients who undergo volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

To determine the minimum value, 122 patients were classified into 6 groups according to the bladder volume at TP: <100 mL (group 1), 100-149 mL (group 2), 150-199 mL (group 3), 200-249 mL (group 4), 250-299 mL (group 5), and ≥300 mL (group 6). Bladder volumes receiving more than 70 Gy (V_70Gy) and V_50Gy were calculated in each subgroup and compared with the bladder dose-volume constraints specified in our institution. To determine the maximum value, 64 patients who underwent uniform nursing interventions were classified into the same 6 groups. Bladder volumes on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were measured once weekly during treatment, for a total of 8 measurements. Relative bladder volumes (bladder volume on CBCT image [mL]/bladder volume at TP [mL] × 100%) were evaluated in each of the 6 subgroups.

RESULTS

The upper bounds of the 95% confidence intervals of the mean V_70Gy and V_50Gy values in group 1 exceeded the dose constraints at our institution. The mean relative bladder volumes were 104%, 91%, 77%, 81%, 63%, and 59% in groups 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, respectively. The institutional criterion of 70% for the mean relative bladder volume was achieved in groups 1-4, but it could not be achieved in groups 5-6. Therefore, the patients in groups 2-4 met both institutional dose constraints for the bladder at TP and the institutional criterion for the mean relative bladder volume during treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal bladder volumes at TP were between 100 and 250 mL in this setting. Nursing intervention needs to be implemented before treatment planning to ensure that patients achieve the optimal bladder volume range.

Salvage image-guided intensity modulated or stereotactic body reirradiation of local recurrence of prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively evaluate external beam reirradiation (re-EBRT) delivered to the prostate/prostatic bed for local recurrence, after radical or adjuvant/salvage radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS

32 patients received re-EBRT between February 2008 and October 2013. All patients had clinical/radiological local relapse in the prostate or prostatic bed and no distant metastasis. re-EBRT was delivered with selective RT technologies [stereotactic RT including CyberKnife(TM) (Accuray, Sunnyvale, CA); image-guidance and intensity-modulated RT etc.]. Toxicity was evaluated using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria. Biochemical control was assessed according to the Phoenix definition (NADIR + 2 ng ml(-1)).

RESULTS

Acute urinary toxicity: G0, 24 patients; G1, 6 patients; G2, 2 patients. Acute rectal toxicity: G0, 28 patients; G1, 2 patients; and G2, 1 patient. Late urinary toxicity (evaluated in 30 cases): G0, 23 patients; G1, 6 patients; G2, 1 patient. Late renal toxicity: G0, 25 patients; G1, 5 patients. A mean follow-up of 21.3 months after re-EBRT showed that 13 patients were free of cancer, 3 were alive with biochemical relapse and 12 patients were alive with clinically evident disease. Four patients had died: two of disease progression and two of other causes.

CONCLUSION

re-EBRT using modern technology is a feasible approach for local prostate cancer recurrence offering 2-year tumour control in about half of the patients. Toxicity of re-EBRT is low. Future studies are needed to identify the patients who would benefit most from this treatment.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Our series, based on experience in one hospital alone, shows that re-EBRT for local relapse of prostate cancer is feasible and offers a 2-year cure in about half of the patients.

Planning study to compare dynamic and rapid arc techniques for postprostatectomy radiotherapy of prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To compare our standard technique for postprostatectomy radiotherapy of prostate cancer, i.e. using two lateral conformal dynamic arcs with volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) performed with the RapidArc(®) (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The plans were referred to as DA and RA, respectively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The treatment plans of 44 patients receiving adjuvant/salvage radiotherapy in the first months of 2010 were compared. In all cases, the prescribed total dose was 66-68.2 Gy (2.2 Gy per fraction). Both DA and RA plans were optimized in terms of dose coverage and constraints.

RESULTS

Small differences between the techniques were observed for planning target volume (PTV) dose distribution, whereas significant differences in sparing of organs at risk (OARs) were recorded (p < 0.0001). The OAR values (median; 95 % confidence interval, CI) were: rectum: D30 % = 60.7 Gy (59.40-62.04 Gy) and 48.2 Gy (46.40-52.72 Gy), D60 % = 34.1 Gy (28.50-38.92 Gy) and 27.7 Gy (21.80-31.51 Gy); bladder: D30 % = 57.3 Gy (45.83-64.53 Gy) and 46.4 Gy (33.23-61.48 Gy), D50 % = 16.4 Gy (11.89-42.38 Gy) and 17.2 Gy (10.97-27.90 Gy), for DA and RA, respectively. Treatment times were very similar, whereas the monitor units (MU) were 550 ± 29 versus 277 ± 3 for RA and DA, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) show improvements in OAR sparing with RA. However, the RA technique is associated with almost double the number of MUs compared to DA. Regarding the PTV, DA is slightly superior in terms of D2 % and dose homogeneity. On the whole, the results suggest that RA be the favorable technique.

Target volume coverage and dose to organs at risk in prostate cancer patients. Dose calculation on daily cone-beam CT data sets

PURPOSE

On the basis of correct Hounsfield unit to electron density calibration, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) data provide the opportunity for retrospective dose recalculation in the patient. Therefore, the consequences of translational positioning corrections and of morphological changes in the patient anatomy can be quantified for prostate cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The organs at risk were newly contoured on the CBCT data sets of 7 patients so as to evaluate the actual applied dose. The daily dose to the planning target volume (PTV) was recalculated with and without the translation data, which result from the real patient repositioning.

RESULTS

A CBCT-based dose recalculation with uncertainties less than 3 % is possible. The deviations between the planning CT and the CBCT without the translational positioning correction vector show an average dose difference of - 8 % inside the PTV. An inverse proportional relation between the mean bladder dose and the actual volume of the bladder could be established. The daily applied dose to the rectum is about 1-54 % higher than predicted by the planning CT.

CONCLUSION

A dose calculation based on CBCT data is possible. The daily positioning correction of the patient is necessary to avoid an underdosage in the PTV. The new contouring of the organs at risk - the bladder and rectum - allows a better appraisal to be made of the total applied dose to these organs.