1
|
Sheikh GT, Trapp C, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Buchner A, Stief CG, Unterrainer M, Kunz WG, Cyran CC, Grawe F, Delker A, Zacherl MJ, Holzgreve A, Unterrainer LM, Brendel M, Belka C, Li M, Rogowski P. PSMA-PET/CT response after metastasis-directed radiotherapy of bone oligometastases in prostate cancer. EJNMMI REPORTS 2024; 8:25. [PMID: 39155339 PMCID: PMC11330950 DOI: 10.1186/s41824-024-00212-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 08/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Bone metastases are very common in advanced prostate cancer and can sensitively be detected utilizing PSMA-PET/CT. Therefore, our goal was to evaluate the suitability of PSMA-PET/CT-guided metastasis-directed external beam radiotherapy (MDT) as treatment option for patients with biochemical recurrence and oligometastatic bone lesions. MATERIALS & METHODS We retrospectively examined 32 prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence and PSMA-positive oligometastatic disease limited to the bone (n = 1-3). A total of 49 bone lesions were treated with MDT. All patients received a post-radiotherapy PSMA-PET/CT-Scan. Changes in SUVmax, PSMA-positive tumor volume per lesion and PSA, as well as the correlation between the PET/CT-interval and SUVmax response were calculated. RESULTS MDT lead to a SUVmax decrease in 46/49 (94%) of the lesions. The median relative decline of SUVmax was 60.4%, respectively. Based on PSMA-positive lesion volume with a SUV cut-off of 4, 46/49 (94%) of lesions showed complete response, two (4%) partial response and one lesion (2%) was stable on PSMA-PET/CT after MDT. Most of the treated patients (56.3%) showed an initial PSA decline at three months and a PSA nadir of median 0.14 ng/ml after a median time of 3.6 months after MDT. The median relative PSA change at three months after MDT was 3.9%. CONCLUSION MDT is a very effective treatment modality for prostate cancer bone oligometastases and lesion response to MDT can be assessed using the (semi-)quantitative parameters SUVmax and PSMA-positive lesion volume with established SUV cut-offs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel T Sheikh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Christian Trapp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Alexander Buchner
- Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian G Stief
- Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Clemens C Cyran
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Freba Grawe
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Astrid Delker
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Mathias J Zacherl
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Minglun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Paul Rogowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kwon DH, Shakhnazaryan N, Shui D, Hong JC, Mohamad O, de Kouchkovsky I, Borno HT, Bose R, Chou J, Desai A, Fong L, Friedlander TW, Koshkin VS, Aggarwal RR, Feng FY, Hope TA, Small EJ. Serial stereotactic body radiation therapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer detected by novel PET-based radiotracers. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:145.e7-145.e15. [PMID: 36435709 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiopharmaceuticals, including Ga-68-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 and F-18-Fluciclovine, are increasingly used to inform therapies for prostate cancer (CaP). Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to PET-detected oligometastatic CaP has been shown to improve progression free survival (PFS) and delay androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) compared to observation. For men who subsequently develop oligorecurrent CaP, outcomes following second SBRT are unknown. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Eligibility criteria included patients with oligometastatic (1-5 lesions) CaP detected on PSMA or Fluciclovine PET who underwent 2 consecutive SBRT courses to tracer-avid sites. Data on stage, tracer type, concurrent systemic therapy, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses for first SBRT (SBRT1) and second SBRT (SBRT2) were collected. Outcomes included PSA decline ≥50% (PSA50), PFS after SBRT2, and ADT initiation or intensification-free survival after SBRT2. Factors potentially associated with PSA50 after SBRT2 was evaluated with multivariable logistic regression. Factors potentially associated with PFS and ADT initiation/intensification-free survival after SBRT2 were evaluated with separate multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models. RESULTS Twenty-five patients were identified. At SBRT2, oligorecurrence was detected on PSMA and Fluciclovine PET in 17 (68%) and 8 (32%) patients, respectively. Fifteen (60%) patients had castration-sensitive disease and 10 (40%) had castration-resistant disease. After SBRT2, 16 (64%) achieved a PSA50 response, median PFS was 11.0mo, and median ADT initiation/intensification-free survival was 23.2mo. On multivariable analysis, maximum percent change in PSA after SBRT1 (OR 0.94, 95%CI 0.88-0.99, P = 0.046) and concurrent change in systemic therapy (OR 21.61, 95%CI 1.12-417.9, P = 0.042) were associated with PSA50 responses after SBRT2. PSA50 response after SBRT1 was associated with improved PFS (HR 0.36, 95%CI 0.00-0.42, P = 0.008) and ADT initiation/intensification-free survival (HR 0.07, 95%CI 0.01-0.68, P = 0.021) after SBRT2. From SBRT1 to last follow-up (median 48 months), 7 (28%) patients remained ADT-free. CONCLUSIONS Serial SBRT for oligometastatic CaP detected on PSMA or Fluciclovine PET is feasible and can achieve PSA declines, with or without systemic therapy. Degree of biochemical response to first SBRT warrants further study as a potential predictor of PSA response, PFS, and ADT initiation/intensification-free survival following a subsequent SBRT course. This preliminary evidence provides rationale for larger, prospective studies of this strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel H Kwon
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
| | - Nonna Shakhnazaryan
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - David Shui
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Julian C Hong
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Osama Mohamad
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Ivan de Kouchkovsky
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Hala T Borno
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Rohit Bose
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Jonathan Chou
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Arpita Desai
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Lawrence Fong
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Terence W Friedlander
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Vadim S Koshkin
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Rahul R Aggarwal
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Felix Y Feng
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Eric J Small
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pozdnyakov A, Kulanthaivelu R, Bauman G, Ortega C, Veit-Haibach P, Metser U. The impact of PSMA PET on the treatment and outcomes of men with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2022:10.1038/s41391-022-00544-3. [PMID: 35440642 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00544-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET is highly sensitive in identifying disease recurrence in men with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (BCR) after primary therapy and is rapidly being adopted in clinical practice. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the documented impact of PSMA-PET on patient management and outcomes, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, and intermediate and long-term outcome measures. MATERIALS AND METHODS MBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane and OVID databases were searched for studies reporting on the impact of PSMA-PET on the management and outcomes of patients with BCR after definitive primary therapy. Outcome measures assessed included biochemical response to therapy after PET and BCR-free survival (BRFS). The proportions of patients in whom management changed, and the proportion of patients in whom each outcome measure was obtained were tabulated and pooled into meta-analysis using DerSimonian-Laird method. RESULTS A total of 34 studies with 3680 men reported change in management after PSMA-PET and 27 studies with 2639 men reported on at least one outcome measure and had follow-up data. PSMA-PET was positive in 2508/3680 (68.2%). The pooled proportion of change in management after PSMA-PET was 56.4% (95% CI, 48.0-63.9%). A decrease in serum PSA was documented in 72.4% of men (95% CI, 63.4-81.5%), and complete biochemical response in 23.3% (95% CI, 14.6-32.0%) at a median follow-up of 8.1 and 11 months, respectively. The pooled BRFS rate was 60.2% (95% CI, 49.1-71.4%) at a median follow-up of 20 months. CONCLUSION In conclusion, PSMA PET is positive in more than 2/3 of men with BCR and impacts patient management in more than half of the men. BRFS after PET-directed management is 60% at a median of 20 months after salvage therapy, and complete biochemical response may be achieved in up to a quarter of men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Pozdnyakov
- Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Roshini Kulanthaivelu
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Glenn Bauman
- Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Claudia Ortega
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Patrick Veit-Haibach
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ur Metser
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Alongi P, Laudicella R, Lanzafame H, Farolfi A, Mapelli P, Picchio M, Burger IA, Iagaru A, Minutoli F, Evangelista L. PSMA and Choline PET for the Assessment of Response to Therapy and Survival Outcomes in Prostate Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review from the Literature. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071770. [PMID: 35406542 PMCID: PMC8997431 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Radiolabeled choline and PSMA PET have been largely tested in the initial staging of prostate cancer and for biochemical recurrence. Moreover, diverse data are now available about their role in the evaluation of response to local and systematic therapies, and their predictive impact on the prognosis, before and after therapy. Therefore, in the present systematic review, we aimed to describe the available data, to summarize the current evidence in these settings of disease. Abstract The aims of this systematic review were to (1) assess the utility of PSMA-PET and choline-PET in the assessment of response to systemic and local therapy, and to (2) determine the value of both tracers for the prediction of response to therapy and survival outcomes in prostate cancer. We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed/Scopus/Google Scholar/Cochrane/EMBASE databases (between January 2010 and October 2021) accordingly. The quality of the included studies was evaluated following the “Quality Assessment of Prognostic Accuracy Studies” tool (QUAPAS-2). We selected 40 articles: 23 articles discussed the use of PET imaging with [68Ga]PSMA-11 (16 articles/1123 patients) or [11C]/[18F]Choline (7 articles/356 patients) for the prediction of response to radiotherapy (RT) and survival outcomes. Seven articles (three with [68Ga]PSMA-11, three with [11C]Choline, one with [18F]Choline) assessed the role of PET imaging in the evaluation of response to docetaxel (as neoadjuvant therapy in one study, as first-line therapy in five studies, and as a palliative regimen in one study). Seven papers with radiolabeled [18F]Choline PET/CT (n = 121 patients) and three with [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET (n = 87 patients) were selected before and after enzalutamide/abiraterone acetate. Finally, [18F]Choline and [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET/CT as gatekeepers for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer with Radium-223 were assessed in three papers. In conclusion, in patients undergoing RT, radiolabeled choline and [68Ga]PSMA-11 have an important prognostic role. In the case of systemic therapies, the role of such new-generation imaging techniques is still controversial without sufficient data, thus requiring additional in this scenario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierpaolo Alongi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, A.R.N.A.S. Ospedale Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli, 90127 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Riccardo Laudicella
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione Istituto G.Giglio, 90015 Cefalù, Italy;
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy;
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland;
| | - Helena Lanzafame
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Paola Mapelli
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.M.); (M.P.)
| | - Maria Picchio
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.M.); (M.P.)
| | - Irene A. Burger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland;
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kantonsspital Baden, 5404 Baden, Switzerland
| | - Andrei Iagaru
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94035, USA;
| | - Fabio Minutoli
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy;
| | - Laura Evangelista
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, 35128 Padova, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0498211310
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Steuber T, Maurer T, Miller K. [Metachronous oligometastatic prostate cancer-the more the better or only local treatment?]. Urologe A 2021; 60:1534-1545. [PMID: 34734294 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-021-01701-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer metastases may occur at diagnosis (de novo) or metachronous after treatment for localized disease. OBJECTIVE To describe location, prognosis, and individual treatment concepts for metachronous oligometastatic prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Analysis of current treatment guidelines and literature for hormone sensitive, metachronous metastatic prostate cancer. RESULTS Modern imaging modalities lead to earlier diagnosis of metachronous oligometastatic prostate cancer, which offers the opportunity to develop metastasis-directed treatment concepts. Oligometastatic recurrence may occur in locoregional lymph nodes (N1) or as distant disease (M1). N1 disease is predominantly treated by salvage lymph node dissection or radiation. Distant metastasis may be radiated in order to delay systemic treatment. The combination of androgen deprivation and novel androgen receptor-targeted drugs such as apalutamide or enzalutamide are associated with a significant survival benefit compared to castration alone in bone or visceral oligometastatic metachronous disease. CONCLUSION Metachronous oligometastatic prostate cancer is heterogeneous with slow progression compared to men with high volume metastasis. Individual treatment concepts may decrease risk of progression and, thus, delay time to medical treatment. Multimodal approaches are currently being evaluated in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Steuber
- Martini-Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, Gebäude Ost 46, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
| | - T Maurer
- Martini-Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, Gebäude Ost 46, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - K Miller
- Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Charite Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lapa C, Nestle U, Albert NL, Baues C, Beer A, Buck A, Budach V, Bütof R, Combs SE, Derlin T, Eiber M, Fendler WP, Furth C, Gani C, Gkika E, Grosu AL, Henkenberens C, Ilhan H, Löck S, Marnitz-Schulze S, Miederer M, Mix M, Nicolay NH, Niyazi M, Pöttgen C, Rödel CM, Schatka I, Schwarzenboeck SM, Todica AS, Weber W, Wegen S, Wiegel T, Zamboglou C, Zips D, Zöphel K, Zschaeck S, Thorwarth D, Troost EGC. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:1-23. [PMID: 34259912 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01812-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
This comprehensive review written by experts in their field gives an overview on the current status of incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) into radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it highlights ongoing studies for treatment individualisation and per-treatment tumour response monitoring for various primary tumours. Novel tracers and image analysis methods are discussed. The authors believe this contribution to be of crucial value for experts in the field as well as for policy makers deciding on the reimbursement of this powerful imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ambros Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz-Schulze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Miederer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Claus M Rödel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andrei S Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lapa C, Nestle U, Albert NL, Baues C, Beer A, Buck A, Budach V, Bütof R, Combs SE, Derlin T, Eiber M, Fendler WP, Furth C, Gani C, Gkika E, Grosu AL, Henkenberens C, Ilhan H, Löck S, Marnitz-Schulze S, Miederer M, Mix M, Nicolay NH, Niyazi M, Pöttgen C, Rödel CM, Schatka I, Schwarzenboeck SM, Todica AS, Weber W, Wegen S, Wiegel T, Zamboglou C, Zips D, Zöphel K, Zschaeck S, Thorwarth D, Troost EGC. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy. Nuklearmedizin 2021; 60:326-343. [PMID: 34261141 DOI: 10.1055/a-1525-7029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This comprehensive review written by experts in their field gives an overview on the current status of incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) into radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it highlights ongoing studies for treatment individualisation and per-treatment tumour response monitoring for various primary tumours. Novel tracers and image analysis methods are discussed. The authors believe this contribution to be of crucial value for experts in the field as well as for policy makers deciding on the reimbursement of this powerful imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ambros Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz-Schulze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Miederer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Claus M Rödel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andrei S Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Henkenberens C, Derlin T, Bengel F, Ross TL, Kuczyk MA, Giordano FA, Sarria GR, Schmeel LC, Christiansen H, von Klot CAJ. Efficacy of PSMA PET-Guided Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 11:664225. [PMID: 33954116 PMCID: PMC8089391 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.664225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To assess the outcome of radiotherapy (RT) to all PSMA ligand positive metastases for patients with castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Patients and methods A total of 42 patients developed oligometastatic mCRPC and received PSMA PET-guided RT of all metastases. The main outcome parameters were biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), and second-line systemic treatment free survival (SST-FS). Results A total of 141 PSMA ligand-positive metastases were irradiated. The median follow-up time was 39.0 months (12-58 months). During the follow-up five out of 42 (11.9%) patients died of progressive mPCa. Five out of 42 (11.9%) patients showed no biochemical responses and presented with a PSA level ≥10% of the baseline PSA at first PSA level measurement after RT and were classified as non-responders. The median PSA level before RT was 4.79 ng/mL (range, 0.4-46.1), which decreased significantly to a median PSA nadir level of 0.39 ng/mL (range, <0.07-32.8; p=0.002). The median PSA level at biochemical progression after PSMA ligand-based RT was 2.75 ng/mL (range, 0.27-53.0; p=0.24) and was not significantly different (p=0.29) from the median PSA level (4.79 ng/mL, range, 0.4-46.1) before the PSMA ligand-based RT. The median bPFS was 12.0 months after PSMA ligand PET-based RT (95% CI, 11.2-15.8) and the median SST-FS was 15.0 months (95% CI, 14.0-21.5). Conclusion In well-informed and closely followed-up patients, PSMA PET-guided RT represents a viable treatment option for patients with oligometastatic mCRPC to delay further systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Frank Bengel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Tobias L Ross
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Markus A Kuczyk
- Department of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Gustavo R Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Hans Christiansen
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Koerber SA, Beuthien-Baumann B. [Modern radiation therapy planning and image-guided radiotherapy using the example of prostate cancer]. Radiologe 2021; 61:28-35. [PMID: 33057736 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-020-00763-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE Optimizing radiotherapy demands precise delineation of the target structure, not only before but also during the course of radiotherapy. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS For many years, planning of external radiation treatment planning has been based on computer tomography data. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS With the advent of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional hybrid imaging are increasingly being integrated into radiation treatment planning. The development of the MR-linac can be seen as an innovation. PERFORMANCE The integration of MRI and hybrid imaging (positron emission tomography [PET]/CT, PET/MRI) in the treatment planning process enables more precise treatment planning due to the better morphological and functional information. The integration of MRI data on the MR-linac in daily position control enables adaptation of the irradiation plan to the current conditions. ACHIEVEMENTS Technical innovation such as the MR-linac as well as increasing use of hybrid imaging contribute to the objective of further individualization within (radio)oncology. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS Using the example of prostate cancer, the application of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligands and hybrid imaging offers great potential for individualized strategic treatment decisions. The MR-linac appears to be particularly suitable for radiation therapy of prostate cancer. Special attention must be paid to the technical aspects of positioning and data acquisition for the purpose of radiation treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan A Koerber
- Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland. .,Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen (NCT), Heidelberg, Deutschland. .,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Deutschland.
| | | |
Collapse
|